Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
guidelines and may reflect varying levels of consensus. Shortcuts WP:SETWP:SET WP:GOOGWP:GOOG WP:GOOGLEWP:GOOGLE WP:GOOGLETESTWP:GOOGLETEST WP:GTESTWP:GTEST...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Nom & vote... Del on this n-n bio. GTest <<166 for "Mattias Eklundh" Swedish musician>>. ProD notice noted this,...
Click to read more »nothing indicating notability.—Chowbok ☠ 17:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC) Keep The gtest link above is too specific. I find this result fairly notable. Similarly...
Click to read more »November 2025 (UTC) Delete. The article has been up for 13 years. A WP:GTEST today indicates it hasn't attracted any serious attention (if any) by mainstream...
Click to read more »at least in French sources, & as a start there's the NYTimes. Using the gtest for a European author whose works were published in the 1960s is the height...
Click to read more »vandalism). Tankred 03:11, 3 November 2007 (UTC) Keep. Based on the infamous gtest, this is not a neologism anymore, but the word to use. Greswik 18:58, 3...
Click to read more »Quasihuman | Talk Delete Sadly, I agree with the deletes. He only has 75 hits for GTest with his name in quotes.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:18...
Click to read more »bio of n-n apparent champion of a faded-craze puzzle. Lk'd only by Rdrs; GTest <<234 of about 342 for "Bob Burton" cube>>. --Jerzy•t 16:37, 22 February...
Click to read more »n-n war-casualty muralist, whose work is lost or decrepit, and who gets GTest 28 of about 131 for "Bardia Mural" -wikipedia -infobox of which many are...
Click to read more »WP:GTEST, which says "Notability – Decide whether a page should be nominated for deletion." 5Q5|✉ 12:03, 18 August 2024 (UTC) Correction, WP:GTEST aka...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 10:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC) Delete - 104, 000 gtest results - none of the first 10 are this particular Dan King. Violates WP:BIO...
Click to read more »books in general. 1, 2, 3, 4 (many more hosting platforms). Doing a WP:GTEST, there are more profile sources available than are mentioned in the article...
Click to read more »He also created several companies like Magic, which a quick WP:GTEST shows several pieces on. https://www.google.com/search...
Click to read more »July 2025 (UTC) Keep but move to List of reportedly cursed objects. A WP:GTEST for cursed objects is convincing to me that it's a group topic with enough...
Click to read more »logs | views) Nom for del'n, but withhold vote pending better perspective. GTest: 331 of about 664 for "Stephen Woodhams" Sounds closer to notability as...
Click to read more »96.13.213 (talk) 17:41, 22 August 2024 (UTC) Keep: Passes WP:NBIO and WP:GTEST (news search), imo. Called a "Renowned Atheist and Speaker" here, is featured...
Click to read more »Slatersteven (talk) 12:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC) Keep. Passes WP:GNG and WP:GTEST, the latter a search for the alternate spelling Kóoshdaa káa, which provided...
Click to read more »criteria. :bloodofox: (talk) 21:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC) Comment. Doing a WP:GTEST I found these mainstream sources (including Skeptical Inquirer) all using...
Click to read more »no means personal opinion, but the general one among most chemists. WP:GTEST may be useful, but is subject to bias. To summarise the weakness of the...
Click to read more »(talk • contribs) 07:46, 17 August 2025 (UTC) Comment: Here are some WP:GTEST English-language sources I found for any editor to add to the article: FAO...
Click to read more »schools that aren't accredited. Did you read Google Test? Part of it reads, a gtest "be useful as a negative test," but not to claim "a large number of hits"...
Click to read more »He also created several companies like Magic, which a quick WP:GTEST shows several pieces on. https://www.google.com/search...
Click to read more »Consider this template (I used subst to create the text, e.g. {{subst:ChrisGtest}} ): The version of this article listed below this message is a current...
Click to read more »bio of n-n apparent champion of a faded-craze puzzle. Lk'd only by Rdrs; GTest <<234 of about 342 for "Bob Burton" cube>>. --Jerzy•t 16:37, 22 February...
Click to read more »vandalism). Tankred 03:11, 3 November 2007 (UTC) Keep. Based on the infamous gtest, this is not a neologism anymore, but the word to use. Greswik 18:58, 3...
Click to read more »at least in French sources, & as a start there's the NYTimes. Using the gtest for a European author whose works were published in the 1960s is the height...
Click to read more »schools that aren't accredited. Did you read Google Test? Part of it reads, a gtest "be useful as a negative test," but not to claim "a large number of hits"...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 10:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC) Delete - 104, 000 gtest results - none of the first 10 are this particular Dan King. Violates WP:BIO...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD) Nom & vote... Del on this n-n bio. GTest <<166 for "Mattias Eklundh" Swedish musician>>. ProD notice noted this,...
Click to read more »is highly specialized or not generally sourceable via the internet.", WP:GTEST 'Raw "hit" (search result) count is a very crude measure of importance....
Click to read more »nothing indicating notability.—Chowbok ☠ 17:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC) Keep The gtest link above is too specific. I find this result fairly notable. Similarly...
Click to read more »no means personal opinion, but the general one among most chemists. WP:GTEST may be useful, but is subject to bias. To summarise the weakness of the...
Click to read more »Quasihuman | Talk Delete Sadly, I agree with the deletes. He only has 75 hits for GTest with his name in quotes.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:18...
Click to read more »in the target article to justfy continuing the lengthy redirect and a WP:GTEST indicates no internal or external links to maintain. 5Q5|✉ 12:54, 31 January...
Click to read more »but the fact that they are there, proves the worthlessness of GTests and what weight a GTest should be given. Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 03:36, 29 November...
Click to read more »Discovered this while experimenting with footnotes. Not being used, not really suitable for template use. JFW | T@lk 00:29, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete, though...
Click to read more »but the fact that they are there, proves the worthlessness of GTests and what weight a GTest should be given. Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 03:36, 29 November...
Click to read more »(View AfD) Nom for del'n, but withhold vote pending better perspective. GTest: 331 of about 664 for "Stephen Woodhams" Sounds closer to notability as...
Click to read more »searched, and what interpretation to give the results as suggested in WP:GTEST, though thankfully they also rely on other sources like Ngram. DFlhb (talk)...
Click to read more »1234qwer1234qwer4 17:38, 12 March 2025 (UTC) Delete. If you do a News WP:GTEST in quotes for "Kenmore Grassman" to look for suitable nonfringe refs, the...
Click to read more »n-n war-casualty muralist, whose work is lost or decrepit, and who gets GTest 28 of about 131 for "Bardia Mural" -wikipedia -infobox of which many are...
Click to read more »(UTC) I couldn't find any English-language articles on Ovni (film) in a GTEST. Does it even qualify for a title on the English-language Wikipedia? Seems...
Click to read more »WP:GTEST, which says "Notability – Decide whether a page should be nominated for deletion." 5Q5|✉ 12:03, 18 August 2024 (UTC) Correction, WP:GTEST aka...
Click to read more »96.13.213 (talk) 17:41, 22 August 2024 (UTC) Keep: Passes WP:NBIO and WP:GTEST (news search), imo. Called a "Renowned Atheist and Speaker" here, is featured...
Click to read more »November 2025 (UTC) Delete. The article has been up for 13 years. A WP:GTEST today indicates it hasn't attracted any serious attention (if any) by mainstream...
Click to read more »criteria. :bloodofox: (talk) 21:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC) Comment. Doing a WP:GTEST I found these mainstream sources (including Skeptical Inquirer) all using...
Click to read more »books in general. 1, 2, 3, 4 (many more hosting platforms). Doing a WP:GTEST, there are more profile sources available than are mentioned in the article...
Click to read more »July 2025 (UTC) Keep but move to List of reportedly cursed objects. A WP:GTEST for cursed objects is convincing to me that it's a group topic with enough...
Click to read more »Slatersteven (talk) 12:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC) Keep. Passes WP:GNG and WP:GTEST, the latter a search for the alternate spelling Kóoshdaa káa, which provided...
Click to read more »(talk • contribs) 07:46, 17 August 2025 (UTC) Comment: Here are some WP:GTEST English-language sources I found for any editor to add to the article: FAO...
Click to read more »