Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
event of a dispute, start a new deletion discussion. Shortcut WP:GCSDWP:GCSD These criteria for speedy deletion apply to every type of page, such as articles...
Click to read more »sherdog. Papaursa (talk) 20:10, 30 May 2013 (UTC) Speedy Delete - Per WP:GCSD G1 (Patent Nonsense) and G3 (Blatant Hoax). Event doesn't exist and IMO the...
Click to read more »Delete This article seems to be self promotional and could fall under WP:GCSD G11. Its most significant contributors are Judehassan and an IP editor that...
Click to read more »WP:TROLL. SocialRanger (talk) 03:32, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Speedy Delete per WP:GCSD criterion G3 -- it's a blatant hoax. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 18:30, 22 March 2013...
Click to read more »realise now this doesn't quite meet any of the criteria in WP:ACSD or WP:GCSD for speedy deletion but it's still a clear delete. Orange sticker (talk)...
Click to read more »Rathfelder and Orville1974. Ultimately I don't think it meets WP:ACSD or WP:GCSD; specifically, I feel that A7 isn't satisfied because the article claims...
Click to read more »{{GenericCountryStub}}, {{GenericCountryStubDetail}} and the redirects {{GCS}}; {{GCSD}} Stub-type redirection *R: {{royal-stub}}; {{euro-royal-stub}}; {{peer-stub}}...
Click to read more »can be formed that it meets WP:CSD#G11 or anther of the criteria within WP:GCSD or WP:CSD#User pages. If the user indeed has a coi, they may choose to submit...
Click to read more »different name for their articles. (only a few has this problem) {{GCSD|Us|United States}}:{{GCSD|Us|United States}} {{GenericCountryStubDetail|Us|United...
Click to read more »for CSD G5? CoolSkittle (talk) 12:51, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Yes, see WP:GCSD. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC) I am not a frequent...
Click to read more »missed it because I was looking under WP:RCSD and so didn't look under WP:GCSD. As this discussion is already in progress, I believe it's too late to add...
Click to read more »wording not quite fitting? Johnuniq (talk) 22:38, 28 January 2020 (UTC) WP:GCSD specifies that the general speedy criteria apply to all types of pages, explicitly...
Click to read more »fun, rather than malicious misinformation? I know that at the top of WP:GCSD it says that the General criteria do apply to user pages (among other places);...
Click to read more »deletion of non-notable drafts that otherwise didn't meet any of our extant WP:GCSD. But I would like to support something that will make impact. Many proposals...
Click to read more »as merely loading the file page. I'm tempted to delete it under Commons:GCSD#1, but before that I'd like input from someone with a different computer...
Click to read more »serious problems which mean they can never be accepted as an article (see WP:GCSD); otherwise, they are usually left alone so that their creators can continue...
Click to read more »Delete This article seems to be self promotional and could fall under WP:GCSD G11. Its most significant contributors are Judehassan and an IP editor that...
Click to read more »sherdog. Papaursa (talk) 20:10, 30 May 2013 (UTC) Speedy Delete - Per WP:GCSD G1 (Patent Nonsense) and G3 (Blatant Hoax). Event doesn't exist and IMO the...
Click to read more »Rathfelder and Orville1974. Ultimately I don't think it meets WP:ACSD or WP:GCSD; specifically, I feel that A7 isn't satisfied because the article claims...
Click to read more »applies to rejected AfCs that have not been edited in over a year. See WP:GCSD. It should also put some sort of message on the creator's page similar to...
Click to read more »WP:TROLL. SocialRanger (talk) 03:32, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Speedy Delete per WP:GCSD criterion G3 -- it's a blatant hoax. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 18:30, 22 March 2013...
Click to read more »20:57, 17 December 2022 (UTC) Watch out there. It's going to have to meet WP:GCSD or WP:ACSD. I think you meant strong delete? Sungodtemple (talk • contribs)...
Click to read more »20:57, 17 December 2022 (UTC) Watch out there. It's going to have to meet WP:GCSD or WP:ACSD. I think you meant strong delete? Sungodtemple (talk • contribs)...
Click to read more »userspace ... --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:52, 8 December 2012 (UTC) From WP:GCSD G4 A sufficiently identical and unimproved copy, having any title, of a page...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.greenville.k12.sc.us/pr/2016/#GCSD/page1 (R/Xmeta/L) 2016-11-24 11:32:43 (UTC): User GoOKC t • c • dc • l •...
Click to read more »known about the 2009 discussion, I would have speedy'd the new article under GCSD no. 4. I have discussed the issue with Beeblebrox, and even he has said "I...
Click to read more »This template is a stub. Feel free to expand it until it has become an acceptable size. Then you may remove this tag and start adding it to template stubs...
Click to read more »are both internal (non-reader facing) process pages covered only by the GCSD, your point is irrelevant anyway because it is trivial to find even better...
Click to read more »Andrew🐉(talk) 14:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC) @Andrew Davidson: G4 is governed by WP:GCSD which states (with my emphasis): These apply to every type of page with exclusions...
Click to read more »Andrevan@ 21:38, 31 December 2012 (UTC) Your action was legitimate (per WP:GCSD#G4) but your above rationale is very poor. First of all, this is not AFD#2...
Click to read more »Andrevan@ 21:38, 31 December 2012 (UTC) Your action was legitimate (per WP:GCSD#G4) but your above rationale is very poor. First of all, this is not AFD#2...
Click to read more »known about the 2009 discussion, I would have speedy'd the new article under GCSD no. 4. I have discussed the issue with Beeblebrox, and even he has said "I...
Click to read more »Andrew🐉(talk) 14:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC) @Andrew Davidson: G4 is governed by WP:GCSD which states (with my emphasis): These apply to every type of page with exclusions...
Click to read more »2026 (UTC) What's your basis for saying no redirect qualifies for G1? At WP:GCSD, the policy states: These apply to every type of page with exclusions listed...
Click to read more »the draft per the request. However, the G4 absolutely applies here. Per WP:GCSD, general speedy delete criteria applies to "every type of page with exclusions...
Click to read more »realise now this doesn't quite meet any of the criteria in WP:ACSD or WP:GCSD for speedy deletion but it's still a clear delete. Orange sticker (talk)...
Click to read more »your reference, all possible deletion criteria for drafts are listed at WP:GCSD. Jay 💬 18:20, 2 April 2025 (UTC) Thank you! Moondust342 (talk) 19:29, 2...
Click to read more »the draft per the request. However, the G4 absolutely applies here. Per WP:GCSD, general speedy delete criteria applies to "every type of page with exclusions...
Click to read more »