Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
tasks: User:Armbrust/closeFPC.js When NOT promoted, perform the following: Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage: {{FPCresult|Not...
Click to read more »else deems it suitable, they will add it to FPC on your behalf. Alternatively, you can request a regular FPC editor to submit an image on your behalf by...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:FPC/GlossaryWP:FPC/Glossary This page contains a glossary of terms, abbreviations and acronyms frequently used at Wikipedia:Featured Picture...
Click to read more »csr.fpc.com.tw: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...
Click to read more »csr.fpc.com.tw: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...
Click to read more »active of the featured content programs was featured picture candidates (FPC), which promoted an average of 46 pictures a month. This was followed by...
Click to read more »Featured picture candidates (FPC). While failed FPCs are welcome, they must still meet the VP criteria and not all failed FPCs will succeed. The VPC process...
Click to read more »participate. What drew you to Wikipedia's featured picture process? I joined FPC around 2011 because I wanted to familiarize myself with the various featured...
Click to read more »FPC figures. Since the above starts at June, I will start there too: June: 58 FPCs (based on FP archives) July: 139 FPCs Aug: 114 FPCs Sept: 155 FPCs...
Click to read more »A great month for featured articles: Do consider joining FPC, though: we need you. ← Back to Contents View Latest Issue 28 November 2022 Featured content...
Click to read more »(Failed FPC) Lewis Hamilton (McLaren), 2008 Australian Grand Prix (Failed FPC) Rubens Barrichello (Honda), 2008 Japanese Grand Prix (Failed FPC) Mark Webber...
Click to read more »tasks: User:Armbrust/closeFPC.js When NOT promoted, perform the following: Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage: {{FPCresult|Not...
Click to read more »pages have any indication of whether the image was previously nominated for FPC and failed? Spikebrennan 03:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC) If you look at the file...
Click to read more »Somehow, this fell off the FPC main page. Listing it now. MER-C 12:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC) It never was supposed to be on FPC as far as I know. It was...
Click to read more »else deems it suitable, they will add it to FPC on your behalf. Alternatively, you can request a regular FPC editor to submit an image on your behalf by...
Click to read more »the bar at FPC, and users now hold historical images to those expectations. I believe historical images need restoration before going to FPC now. VPC is...
Click to read more »to let it run here first. It can be nominated for FPC later, or if you wish you can proceed with FPC in parallel. Elekhh (talk) 14:15, 20 January 2010...
Click to read more »Comments Would very likely pass FPC. High resolution scan, used very well in the articles. Fix 'creator' however for FPC - John Tenniel. Jujutacular talk...
Click to read more »June 2010 (UTC) Oppose for the exact same reasons given at FPC. VPC is NOT just a poor man's FPC for anything that can't make it there - this failed badly...
Click to read more »I am wondering which of the following pictures have a decent chance at FPC. Creator JPL/NASA Nominated by Nergaal (talk) 02:59, 10 November 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »31 October 2008 (UTC) Comments This is a very interesting picture, but on FPC standards I doubt that it would make it through. It reminds me a bit of a...
Click to read more »requirement yet), I wanted to see if others thought it was up to the level of FPC. If not I'll run it at VPC when the timing is right. I originally took three...
Click to read more »of the second pano in full size. Would any of the images have a chance at FPC? Some background information on the history of the two photos. Nominated...
Click to read more »I'm not sure how these would go on FPC since the body is cut off, the left-most one is currently on Com:qic and Com:fpc and seems to be going OK, But I would...
Click to read more »Comments: Hmm, good, but not great. First off, if you do decide to nominate, FPC will require a specific genus and species; "German butterfly" will not work...
Click to read more »either, I should hope. Although VPC quality doesn't have to be as good as FPC, it should be large and clear enough to be educational about the topic. The...
Click to read more »ask for his choice of the week at FPC- he's not involved with FPC in any way at the moment. There are plenty of FPC regulars who I have no doubt would...
Click to read more »will rename all FPC subpages containing the namespace of the file ("Image:" or "File") by removing the namespace. Links going to FPC/{{PAGENAME}} are...
Click to read more »discussion has arisen following complaints and suggestions raised at the FPC talk page in May 2009. There hasn't been much discussion here recently. Only...
Click to read more »Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC) Comments Already been thru FPC here. --jjron (talk) 14:19, 25 May 2012 (UTC) Seconder High resolution and...
Click to read more »township (it is a fairly new image). I was wondering about nominating it at FPC, but wanted some other opinions. Any advice or feedback is appreciated, Ruhrfisch...
Click to read more »standards on FPC are almost insanely high. However, that being said, if possible rejection doesn't phase you, it may be worth trying on FPC. --Pharaoh Hound...
Click to read more »user has 2 other names. [1], [2] Signed as other accounts to vote in an FPC of theirs; though signing as the other accounts, the user was logged in as...
Click to read more »stabilize before continuing. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage: {{FPCresult|Kept|}} --~~~~ Do NOT put any other information...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Agree with IdLoveOne. Haziness would likely prevent passing at FPC or VPC. Jujutacular talk 19:32, 2 November 2010 (UTC) Seconder I uploaded...
Click to read more »picture of the day on Wikipedia's Main Page. Featured picture candidates (FPC) selects images that illustrate a subject in a compelling and informative...
Click to read more »certainly a very nice eye-catching picture but I doubt it would succeed at FPC. There is a lot of noise in the shadow areas and probably also jpeg artifacting...
Click to read more »version with the tail chopped off though. 84.9.223.82 Neutral very nearly FPC quality, but the upper back is blurred -- looks like he moved during the...
Click to read more »7 January 2006 (UTC) Above user has 10 edits. This is Wikipedia FPC, not Commons FPC. The point of the Featured Pictures here is to illustrate an article...
Click to read more »pretty good and detailed. I'm thinking about nominating this one for a WP:FPC or a WP:VPC but I would like to have your comments before doing that. Should...
Click to read more »promoted for Valentine’s Day, and this image had spent less than two days on FPC before promotion. Sorry, with no offence meant to anyone involved (who I’m...
Click to read more »Elephantissimo (talk) 20:40, 31 March 2008 (UTC) I think this would fail FPC based on composition issues. Not enough of the guitar is in the picture....
Click to read more »While it fails WP:FPC resolution requirements, it would not be too hard for someone to create a new version of [[:]] which could pass WP:FPC. Thoughts? —Dgiest c...
Click to read more »| Talk 04:54, 18 October 2008 (UTC) Comments This has been nominated at FPC before I am pretty sure. I don't think it passed. Noodle snacks (talk) 05:17...
Click to read more »January 2015 (UTC) FPC noms are up for about two weeks. That's a long time for anyone upset with them, and actively trying to work on the FPC page. I'd say...
Click to read more »for FPC twice before and failed. There are too many stitching faults in it IMO. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 18:26, 18 April 2010 (UTC) Conclusion Failed FPC twice...
Click to read more »is detailed and of high resolution. There was recently a similar photo on FPC that was not accepted primarily on the grounds it was of too low resolution...
Click to read more »to get some feedback on the design, and whether it should be submitted to fpc/vpc. Articles this image appears in New York City Subway...
Click to read more »Composition, facial expression etc. are superior. I encourage you to put it in the FPC queue. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 03:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC) I too like...
Click to read more »for FPC? I personally like the exposure bracket. --Fir0002 05:06, 9 December 2005 (UTC) I like 2 and 4 the most. Why not add more than one to FPC (or...
Click to read more »somewhat out of focus at full size and might meet with some opposition at FPC. Tomdobb (talk) 18:23, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Flash is a little harsh, esp apparent...
Click to read more »Reason Recently failed a FPC nom here, but I still think it's a good picture- both aesthetically pleasing and encyclopedic. I like the colours, and it...
Click to read more »diosesredondo.com/index.php/fpc/copamustang/175-nacional-ficha-al-central-orozco. * Links added in this diff: diosesredondo.com/index.php/fpc...
Click to read more »taken by FPC. [12]: Texas Tribune. Yet another article about an action by FPC, but makes clear that the action is notable primarily because of FPC's involvement...
Click to read more »requirements in the smaller direction. Curious to know if this could pass at FPC. Articles this image appears in Times Square, New York City, United States...
Click to read more »Banzoo (talk) 02:07, 27 September 2009 (UTC) Comments Seconder Nominated at FPC. --jjron (talk) 13:24, 10 October 2009 (UTC) Fantastic picture, lovely colours...
Click to read more »ZooFari 23:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC) Comments I would definitely support at FPC. I would like to see this same image done in the way Fir did his oranges...
Click to read more »process i wanted to get opinions from this peer review before putting this to FPC Nominated by Seddon69 (talk) 00:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Comments A great...
Click to read more »Elephantissimo (talk) 13:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC) Comments I doubt this would pass FPC given how much the cage obscures the iguana. It is a nicely detailed picture...
Click to read more »Traveler100 (talk) 10:21, 15 August 2009 (UTC) Comments Is this good enough for FPC?--Traveler100 (talk) 10:22, 15 August 2009 (UTC) It isnt a bad image but...
Click to read more »I almost wanted to run to FPC with this. Pretty high-quality shot of its head and snout and, I think, indisputable EV to its article. Articles this image...
Click to read more »August 2010 (UTC) Comments I thought about thinking about nominating this in FPC, not sure I would because of some lighting issues in this on the ridges and...
Click to read more »I think you have done a very good job - ATM I doubt this would pass at FPC, but there's not a lot wrong with it and it's a good contribution to the...
Click to read more »where quite a number of pictures exist, for instance, the moon landing, FPC attempts to select the best of the ones produced. An image has more encyclopedic...
Click to read more »if it's mainly the image format a new one should be made and put through FPC with a note saying it's a replacement for htis not delist this right away...
Click to read more »suggest nominating this one at FPC. Spikebrennan (talk) 14:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC) OK. I have nominated it at FPC. Snowman (talk) 12:27, 13 November...
Click to read more »an interesting/aesthetic picture, IMO. However, I'm a little worried what FPC will say about composition and encyclopedic value (only one of the four buildings...
Click to read more »independently notable. However, I'm not sure if it's worth putting up for FPC due to the back of someone's head being in the way. Articles this image appears...
Click to read more »image is quite nicely done, the problem images like this tend to have at FPC is that while we believe you that this is Lake George, Florida, it quite...
Click to read more »of File:RedArrows01.jpg is the type of shot that would have a chance at FPC. Makeemlighter (talk) 02:31, 24 September 2010 (UTC) Seconder Having previously...
Click to read more »Since I never added an picture to FPC, I would like to know if there is any problems about it before shipping it off. GamerPro64 (talk) 00:35, 10 October...
Click to read more »Had nominated many such images at FPC. After recommendation from mikaul and jjron, I have decided to have it reviewed before another chance at the nomination...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comments: The ropes here are not as problematic as in the other failed FPC, so I'd think of it as a toss-up; some might call it encyclopedic, others...
Click to read more »(UTC) Seconder FPC adores "science-y" stuff like this, and I love how great the quality is for such a very large image and many people on FPC are strongly...
Click to read more »with a few of the images you have put through here and FPC (e.g., the Fig Leaf currently at FPC). The Rule of thirds may be a useful article to read to...
Click to read more »the thumbnail 250 pixels again to match the formatting of the rest of the FPC page. When people oppose the image due to size, they're not basing their...
Click to read more »right would most likely be enough to attract more opposes than supports at FPC. A couple of pointers: a 10% crop in from both sides would frame the subject...
Click to read more »quality problem. Also has no {{FPC}} tag. Nominate and delist. - —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 15:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC) Added FPC tag. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs...
Click to read more »suppose this FPC is moot then? - Mailer Diablo 13:30, 21 March 2006 (UTC) Ergh, OK. So we have the same image twice. The one which is currently FPC is much...
Click to read more »(which I need to nominate these). Can someone put these two images on the FPC page for me? 140.247.250.128 15:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC) (This is Calliopejen1...
Click to read more »think this image meets the FPC criteria, and definietly adds to the encyclopedia, and thus I am nominating the image for FPC status. Articles this image...
Click to read more »wrong. --Janke | Talk 14:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Oh, ok, sorry, i'm new to FPC. – Jerryteps 22:25, 4 December 2008 (UTC) No problem (others will fix any...
Click to read more »is not enough to be deemable featurable. kdm85 This is peer review, not FPC. Noodle snacks (talk) 23:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC) This strikes me as an...
Click to read more »certainly an impressive picture, I'm afraid this picture would have no chance at FPC due to heavy artifacting (look closely at the dark region in the center)...
Click to read more »satellite (hint: Perhaps GoogleMaps/GoogleEarth), that would probably pass at FPC, but I might support this at VPC. --I′d※<3※Ɵɲɛ (talk) 23:47, 21 July 2010...
Click to read more »unfortunately, I doubt it would pass FPC. The main problem is that it doesn't seem very illustrative of anything. FPC needs to see very concrete encyclopedicity...
Click to read more »positive response to my animated map of the provinces of Canada, now on FPC, I decided to try it out on the Confederacy. But since it's a bigger project...
Click to read more »Lycoming County, Pennsylvania. It seems to meet the requirements for WP:FPC and this potential nomination was suggested to me by Dincher. I took the...
Click to read more »Comments: FPC must have at least one dimension that is over 1000 pixels. Especially considering that this is not a "historical" photo, the voters at FPC will...
Click to read more »a chance, I'd give it a try at FPC and see. ;-) — raekyt 22:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC) Thanks a lot :) . Will try for FPC. Rishabh Tatiraju (talk) 12:25,...
Click to read more »Mostlyharmless (talk) 23:04, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Without judging the picture for FPC readyness or encyclopedic value at all, I must say that the crosswalks are...
Click to read more »and there like on the top and the shine on the rail is overexposed, and FPC can be very picky... --I'ḏ♥One 23:24, 22 September 2010 (UTC) That little...
Click to read more »resolution. It's full resolution is over 1,000 in both directions. New to the FPC thing but wanted to give it a crack. SGGH speak! 15:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »suspect a lot of voters would be calling for a restoration, especially at FPC. Also very small DOF. I'm also not really taken by the left side of his face...
Click to read more »ends on 16 Jul 2019 at 17:28:17 (UTC) Reason Doing very well on Commons FPC at the moment. Crisp sharpness. The only gripe is the rather tight crop,...
Click to read more »you could lose that cut off shadow on the right. For a replaceable image, FPC reviewers generally expect more. MER-C 07:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC) Seconder...
Click to read more »of Sydney. One of the more significant problems this image would have at FPC would be to do with the bending horizon - if you look at the treeline in...
Click to read more »and Wyoming. This "user" has then nominated several of these photos on WP:FPC. <Pigeon on the Empire State Building - by Polarqueen (talk · contribs) Daffodil...
Click to read more »Enuja 18:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC) I would probably give it a weak support on FPC. The sharpness is fine for the areas that are in focus, but the depth of...
Click to read more »full disclosure, in the future I may nominate File:EdwardTeller1958.jpg at FPC or VPC. This recently failed at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Edward...
Click to read more »would want to be straightened up if you are considering putting it up at FPC. The other thing is that I seem to remember you getting a similar picture...
Click to read more »00:02, 29 December 2007 (UTC) Comment. Thanks for all the happy snaps, but FPC is not a personal photo sharing site. You can nominate an "alternative" image...
Click to read more »the historic image I have here, I am looking for help on getting this for FPC. Creator Scanned, cropped and edited by User:Mitchazenia. Original photographer...
Click to read more »likely fail at FPC. Makeemlighter (talk) 23:39, 4 October 2009 (UTC) As per Makeem, it's pretty, but lacks EV. Would not pass at FPC, sorry. BTW, the...
Click to read more »it through FPC. Presumably they were taken with the same camera as your FPC that you nominated, they have similar quality issues. Your FPC image was the...
Click to read more »period ends on 23 Dec 2021 at 18:12:58 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »File:The image filename, excluding "Image:" Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles this image...
Click to read more »own): On the occasion of the 2,500th featured picture, The Signpost asked FPC regular Makeemlighter about the earliest days of the process and how it has...
Click to read more »regarding the photo and seeing if it meets the high standards of a VPC or FPC. I have another version of this photo that has the buses cropped out more...
Click to read more »don't think it would pass FPC, the depth of field is too shallow I think. I'm satisfied with the sharpness, but someone at FPC might say it's not high enough...
Click to read more »but if this is the way that FPC runs here, why do we bother? Aren't we just duplicating the effort of commons:COM:FPC? The only nominal difference I...
Click to read more »January 2009 (UTC) Sorry, I opened the FPC page and VPC page simultaneously and thought I was commenting on the FPC page. Muhammad(talk) 16:58, 18 January...
Click to read more »of 31 articles a month. This was followed by featured picture candidates (FPC; 28 a month). Coming in third was featured list candidates (FLC; 20 a month)...
Click to read more »I had nominated this at FPC last month but there were a few distortion problems, so I withdrew. I would like feedback on its quality now. IMO it has EV...
Click to read more »appears to be of a high quality. Any reason why it shouldn't be nominated at FPC? Thanks in advance. Articles this image appears in Cary Grant Creator RKO...
Click to read more »Gotsiy3 nom at FPC. In the Kroes photo, she looks like she's levitating. Spikebrennan (talk) 00:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Seconder Nominated at FPC as Nataliya...
Click to read more »Restored version of Image:Buffalo soldiers.jpg. Think it fares a chance on FPC? Appears in 25th Infantry Regiment (United States). Nominated by DurovaCharge...
Click to read more »for the dynamic composition and additional detail permitted by zooming in, FPC generally favors more stable and balanced shots of architecture, or at least...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comments Unfortunately, I don't think this'll have much of a chance at FPC. Generally the only pics of nature that pass are of super-high proffesional-grade...
Click to read more »encyclopedic, but it's quality is not perfect. I was wondering if it could pass FPC or not. Nominate and support. - NauticaShades 06:48, 28 October 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »hence deserves a Featured Picture. However, I have a few doubts because the FPC states that licensing has to be "free", and I'm not very sure whether this...
Click to read more »is worth putting in at FPC. NotFromUtrecht (talk) 16:35, 3 March 2010 (UTC) Seconder Conclusion Nominated (and passed) at FPC. Makeemlighter (talk) 08:57...
Click to read more »image of the subject, thus EV. I think it technically/arguably could pass FPC on crit., but I don't feel like arguing about dimensions right now. Articles...
Click to read more »File:The image filename, excluding "Image:" Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles this image...
Click to read more »Ayyavazhi articles; It looks good too. So i feel better to nominate it to FPC. It deserves? Creator Vaikunda Raja Nominated by Vaikunda Raja (talk) 19:20...
Click to read more »certainly a very nice eye-catching picture but I doubt it would succeed at FPC. There is a lot of noise in the shadow areas and probably also jpeg artifacting...
Click to read more »ellipses-ed-shaped; also, the outer band's aren't brilliant enough. if this went through FPC, I would oppose. Sorry. HurricaneFan25 15:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC) It is...
Click to read more »Reason I still can't believe that this didn't pass FPC. The image quality is there, and it is practically spewing in enc; The wattlebird feeds on nectar...
Click to read more »(UTC) Support & Comment - Not to be difficult, but the image linked to the FPC was not actually used in either article (a different version was used). I...
Click to read more »filename, excluding "Image:" or "File:" Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles this image...
Click to read more »the tonal problem (which I have to say would raise a lot of opposition on FPC) but the original had already been very carelessly edited, leaving huge chunks...
Click to read more »User:Flibbertigibbet. I think this could be a potential FPC candidate, but the image needs a little help before going to the FPC. Nominate and support. - TomStar81 (Talk)...
Click to read more »filename, excluding "Image:" or "File:" Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »stopped by to review these two probably reflects the response you'd get at FPC, sad to say. As originals they're were probably too small and lacking in...
Click to read more »unlikely to pass FPC. Thegreenj 22:41, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the comment. I'd forgotten that the previous version was put through FPC. Do you think...
Click to read more »Nominated by TheWB (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC) Comments Great picture but, FPC must have encyclopedic value. This photo has much more aesthetic value so...
Click to read more »that's why I am submitting it here. I also would like to nominate it for FPC, but since I've never done this before, am not sure how. Nominated by HaarFager...
Click to read more »really crazy. Anyway, I would like to know if this would likely to pass a FPC before actually doing so. GamerPro64 (talk) 03:02, 20 December 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »promotion of the edit and replaced the original image in the articles per FPC closing procedure. The edit was then promptly removed. I replaced it, and...
Click to read more »[1] While an interesting photo, the current version here is too small for FPC (<1000px on the shortest side). Quality is also poor. If you can upload the...
Click to read more »nomination, MER-C. Worth mentioning that, coincidentally, there's an active FPC at Commons for another photo of the same species. When that's promoted, I...
Click to read more »more information: Number of images: Number of images in the nomination (WP:FPC-only). Hover: Shows the filenames of the images Nomination age: How long...
Click to read more »17:58, 12 August 2008 (UTC) This is very likely to pass. If you post this on FPC there will probably be some edits made then people there can vote on which...
Click to read more »02:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC) Thanks! I'm thinking of giving it an entry in WP:FPC once it's been a while on WikiProject Anatomy and on general display in the...
Click to read more »pictures by Wilson Bentley. I'm wondering if I should nominate them for FPC. Nominate and support. - Nauticashades 12:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC) Comments:...
Click to read more »Could I get comments on quality and chances at FPC? I'm not sure if this image can pass FPC or not, and would like to hear a few opinions before writing...
Click to read more »uploaded a couple of photos on Commons and immediately nominated them at WP:FPC; they are Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Coral reef at Andaman and...
Click to read more »It's definitely a nice picture, but I think it would likely have trouble at FPC for composition and encyclopedic issues. The picture is a bit tilted, and...
Click to read more »Pastrami (talk) 11:16, 23 May 2008 (UTC) Comments Nice job, but people at FPC will cite color splotches on the ostrich egg and a possibly request more...
Click to read more »horrible, horrible colour of the backdrop - would it be a sticking point at FPC? Thanks again. Articles this image appears in Belle & Sebastian Creator Marisa...
Click to read more »filename, excluding "Image:" or "File:" Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles this image...
Click to read more »nominating this image at PPR. We get quite a lot of NASA images through FPC, and standards are pretty high. This is an attractive image, but we already...
Click to read more »Dylan (talk) 01:03, 17 August 2008 (UTC) Comments I'm sure it wouldn't pass FPC with that stripe at the bottom. Fletcher (talk) 01:01, 19 August 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) Well welcome to FPC! I suppose I've seen you around the wiki so much I assumed you've been here. You may find the FPC glossary helpful to get...
Click to read more »image in these conditions, without perverting the ultimate goal of FPC? Commons FPC is the right place for this particular image. -- Alvesgaspar (talk)...
Click to read more »terms of composition this is a bit of a mess and would not pass either at FPC or VPC. We only get to the subject of the picture after crossing the rail-lines...
Click to read more »I'm being nice compared to how harshly it would probably be criticized on FPC, and, let's be honest: It's a museum piece. Someone could go to the National...
Click to read more »November 2009 (UTC) Delist. Clearly doesn't meet FPC - particularly point 9 digital manipulation. Note: FPC was merely an incipient draft at the time of the...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Comments This seems like it might have a reasonable chance at FPC to me. I placed it in Comb (anatomy) where it possibly has greatest EV, people...
Click to read more »might have a chance. But anyway, nothing about Commons will be mentioned on FPC, rest assured. Thanks --Malachirality (talk) 05:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »systelusa.com/fpc-luggable-computer.html. * Links added in this diff: www.systelusa.com/eifpd-1u-19-lcd-7192.html (19, 20, 19, 1) www.systelusa.com/fpc-luggable-computer...
Click to read more »with quite good composition, but for mine I wouldn't think it would pass at FPC. I'm not really sure of the subject (it's not in an article), but assume...
Click to read more »a better image of FDR exists. I should probably mention this is my first FPC, so please tell me if I do anything wrong. Articles this image appears in...
Click to read more »artefacts. A downsize to about 1600px wide helps and still easily makes the FPC size limits, but consequently makes the central feature, the train, a bit...
Click to read more »filename, excluding "Image:" or "File:" Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) nice picture Articles...
Click to read more »above enunciates clearly my reason for cutting back my participation in the FPC process: too many participants care only about pretty pictures of charismatic...
Click to read more »depth in the picture. I am worried that this may hold back the picture at WP:FPC, and would like a second opinion on that matter. Articles this image appears...
Click to read more »speaking help for the caption, and I request a review of its suitability for FPC. I have another version File:Tinghøj Hammershøj Kvorning 2010-01-08 2.jpg...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2019 at 08:52:36 (UTC) Reason Seen on Commons FPC last week, where it succeeded unanimously. We don't get much fashion stuff...
Click to read more »encyclopedic value. Debivort 21:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Oppose Read the rules! FPC needs at least 1000 pixels in one direction, this one is 223 by 370 pixels...
Click to read more »imagery, so any comments would be appreciated. Does this have a chance at FPC? Articles this image appears in Usher (entertainer) Creator David Berkowitz...
Click to read more »and clarity. Comments requested. Was wondering if it's worth submitting to FPC. Creator Kamranki Nominated by Kamran (talk) 21:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles this image appears in links to the article/s that...
Click to read more »recognize the bravery of a black sailor, Miller, on MLK day. I am skeptical that FPC and its mission to identify and highlight eye-catching excellence in photography...
Click to read more »Calliopejen1 mentions below, its inclusion in nectarvore, alone satisfies the FPC criteria!. Therefore I can see no valid ground to oppose based on "lack of...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Comments I'd say EV concerns would probably hold this back at FPC. The image doesn't seem to illustrate Chicago River particularly well. Not...
Click to read more »doesn't seem complete. Some of these issues were also raised at the original FPC and weren't really resolved, so I think it's dubious if this should have...
Click to read more »to me. Wronkiew (talk) 05:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Seconder Nominated at FPC by Muhammad. --jjron (talk) 12:35, 12 October 2008 (UTC) There's obvious...
Click to read more »FP? wadester16 04:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC) No good reason. A transition to FPC would work too. ZooFari 05:18, 25 July 2009 (UTC) Support Noodle snacks (talk)...
Click to read more »There is no separate bar of notability for FPC. If she's notable enough for Wikipedia, she's notable enough for FPC. Otherwise we'd have people going "Oppose:...
Click to read more »name. MER-C 01:49, 24 April 2009 (UTC) Seconder Definitely worth a go at FPC. Wouldn't worry about renaming, the current name is fine. Surely could also...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2020 at 19:37:18 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's most educational work " it should be good enough to be a good FPC. Otherwise I am afraid FP would be mostly represented by beautiful, high...
Click to read more »picture, but it's really not up to the standards expected of panoramas at FPC. Compare it to our other featured panoramas. There's also a problem with...
Click to read more »period ends on 24 Mar 2020 at 17:32:05 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »You'd need to get an aerial shot or panorama I think to have any chance at FPC/VPC. --jjron (talk) 13:12, 6 September 2009 (UTC) But you can see the sign...
Click to read more »Reason I'm a bit of a newb when it comes to FPC, and I've just had a quick read through the filtering system that's in place here. I only came across...
Click to read more »Reason Didn't pass FPC since apparently flash photographs are a no-no, even for birds that only spend time on land at night. Regardless, the photo was...
Click to read more »Would like feedback for FPC nom. Creator Muhammad Nominated by Muhammad(talk) 20:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC) Comments Is this a stitched image? Most of the...
Click to read more »probably never pass FPC, because of the cut-off part, it is quite good. —Ceran [speak ] 22:39, 10 December 2008 (UTC) Comment At FPC: "there were quite...
Click to read more »welcome you to FPC Ambi, your first time here isn't it? --Fir0002 09:32, 5 December 2005 (UTC) Haha, ditto Fir0002. Aussie invasion of FPC. Enochlau 05:37...
Click to read more »really not that fantastic. It's not FP material, and even while it was at FPC it was doubted that it would pass. Low quality, should be replaced with better...
Click to read more »cloned out since they're distracting, wouldn't really have a chance at either FPC or VPC, imho. If there was a Trube Castle then VPC is probably doable, but...
Click to read more »barely squeaks by the minimum image size requirement. It's possible people at FPC would still object. But I like it. Fletcher (talk) 16:29, 13 July 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »me)what's new? 17:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC) Comments Indeed too small to pass FPC. People vary on size requirements when it comes to VPC (there's nothing specific...
Click to read more »Shame, it's a good angle for the pier, but the overcast rules it out for a FPC, and might be an issue for a VPC. — raekyT 20:40, 27 July 2010 (UTC) I'm...
Click to read more »Sage Ross Dissatisfaction with elements of the Featured picture candidates (FPC) process escalated this week with a proposal to delete the entire Valued...
Click to read more »picture and wondering if it is good enough to stand a chance as a VPC or FPC? Creator Tango22 Nominated by Tango22 (talk) 01:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Mottld (talk) 12:44, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Comments Seconder Nominated at FPC here by Mottld six minutes after this posting. --jjron (talk) 07:44, 24 March...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates (FAC), Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates (FPC), etc. All aspects of an article should be brought up to the highest possible...
Click to read more »at the top, admittedly). Any other reason why it shouldn't be listed at FPC? Articles this image appears in Gilbert Strang Creator Sijothankam Suggested...
Click to read more »point 04:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Support; I have seen videos up for WP:FPC, but in regards to sound, it sounds very good. On my speakers it's more or...
Click to read more »Reason Probably ultimately failed FPC on lack of wow, but the enc is good Articles this image appears in Burnie Creator Noodle snacks Support as nominator...
Click to read more »looks a lot crisper as a result (it would still meet FPC size requirements). Re its chances on FPC I feel it's technical qualities may not be quite there...
Click to read more »undrafted college level player. Also VPC is not a consolation prize for a failed FPC. — raeky (talk | edits) 23:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC) Did you present any valid...
Click to read more »through FPC. --Pharaoh Hound (talk) 12:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC) I hope you realize that this section of Peer Review has nothing to do with FPC, and focuses...
Click to read more »we're here, is there any chance for the best of these photos to become a FPC? Tewy 01:49, 26 June 2006 (UTC) says: "It's almost Friday" Comment. I'm not...
Click to read more »—fetch·comms 22:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC) Comments This shot seems to artsy too pass at FPC. Usually b/w pictures pass only if they're historic. The EV here doesn't...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Comments: I don't think it would be featured; see the recent FPC nom for a transit of mercury which is admittedly of lower quality. Personally...
Click to read more »17 Mar 2019 at 21:22:43 (UTC) Reason This Commons FP (unanimously passed FPC in late 2017) is the next entry in the Magic Text File (TM). Articles in...
Click to read more »if that affects the FPC (nothing in the rules though). Spongie555 (talk) 06:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC) Comment : Obviously it effects FPC Spongie555.... DreamSparrow...
Click to read more »period ends on 19 Jan 2022 at 16:14:03 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »filename, excluding "Image:"Eugene Delacroix" Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first)This picture is strong...
Click to read more »though perhaps not so bad at full size. It would most probably get through on FPC, considering how voting goes there, but does ol' Sam deserve better? --jjron...
Click to read more »think we've got an excellent FPC. =) Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 05:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Thanks, I have nominated it at FPC here Ruhrfisch ><>°° 05:27...
Click to read more »there too. I'd say it was worth a punt at FPC, anyway. --mikaultalk 23:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC) Nominated at FPC as Coffee grinding, 1905 by Durova on 8...
Click to read more »August 2009 (UTC) Support per nom, but shouldn't it have been closed at FPC before being nommed here? I don't believe an image should have active noms...
Click to read more »Just noting this here, so that the Signpost and anyone else watching WP:FPC can pick it up. I've already delisted it. MER-C 12:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »encyclopedic contribution, but then you knew that :-) Before nominating for FPC I'd (maybe) try to increase the contrast/reduce apparent exposure a bit (if...
Click to read more »done so). I actually like the image itself, but would Strong Oppose it on FPC on encyclopaedic grounds, and am even inclined to remove it from the Blender...
Click to read more »just not sure if I should put it up on the "real" picture nomination on WP:FPC. Creator Kieff Nominated by Mononomic (talk) 01:19, 20 December 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »I like the image. I believe that there's been some disagreement here on FPC about how much of a plant needs to be shown for the EV to be adequate. After...
Click to read more »(UTC) Reason This one is complete Thor's helmet and hence makes it a perfect FPC Articles in which this image appears NGC 2359 FP category for this image...
Click to read more »27 May 2010 (UTC) Comments I'd say this would have little to no chance at FPC, and probably little chance at VPC, sorry. Looks to be quite lacking in sharpness...
Click to read more »filename, excluding "Image:" or "File:" Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »filename, excluding "Image:" or "File:" Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »I was browsing through WP:FPC earlier today and somehow - I'm not sure how - ended up at the radiolarian page, where I discovered this image. I'm aware...
Click to read more »not vice versa: FPC is here to recognise images that bring value to the encyclopedia, the encyclopedia is not here to display images FPC thinks are beautiful...
Click to read more »job. QAZ 14:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC) NOTE: User's only three edits are to FPC nominations. howcheng {chat} 23:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Oppose Over compressed...
Click to read more »(talk) 14:29, 23 September 2013 (UTC) Unregistered users can't !vote at WP:FPC. Armbrust The Homunculus 08:14, 2 October 2013 (UTC) Oppose - Picture is...
Click to read more »washed out and removed the yellow. Even if this doesn't make it through FPC I'd like to know how else I can improve it. Thanks. Articles this image appears...
Click to read more »this image through the FPC and it failed. Some of the contributers at the time suggested the the image may do better as an FPC candidate if it was the...
Click to read more »if you think any meet FPC. Thanks. (Apologies for not formatting this like the others; of those listed, if you think any meet FPC, then I could post just...
Click to read more »Reason Nominated at WP:FPC but not technically sufficient Articles this image appears in White-faced Heron Creator Glen Fergus Support as nominator --Noodle...
Click to read more »ends on 21 Aug 2015 at 16:41:26 (UTC) Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »February 2006 (UTC) Support DaGizzaChat © 08:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC) FPC maintainer? Sounds ok. If you can do the big jobs, you can do the small jobs...
Click to read more »gallery. The image must be used in the body of the article to be eligible at FPC. Makeemlighter (talk) 02:29, 24 September 2010 (UTC) Swapped this one's place...
Click to read more »Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured without opposition. We don't see this part of the world often at FPC. Articles in which this...
Click to read more »Aesthetically I like it, but I rather feel that it wouldn't do too well at FPC simply because 'cutoff' building photos and building photos taken at odd...
Click to read more »think I need more comments here first rather than charge directly at the FPC. My Photoshop fu is weak so I can't help with improving the images.--Lenticel...
Click to read more »opposes, I suppose I'll say something. I really hate it when people oppose an FPC candidate because the area focused on isn't ideal for the voter. The picture...
Click to read more »AthensTalk 14:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC) Don't lose hope. Most FPC regulars probably have a majority of their FPC noms fail to be promoted. There's a learning curve...
Click to read more »of FPC. It's a win-win situation as you are not discouraged by the sterner criticism here and candidacies such as these don't clutter up the FPC page...
Click to read more »that an image generally should be in an article for a seven days before its FPC nomination. I suggest suspending this nomination for a week. Pinetalk 05:44...
Click to read more »noticeable on the left side. I'm not sure how that would affect its chances at FPC. Fletcher (talk) 20:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC) Is that just cause that area...
Click to read more »since comp. is vertical). – Sca (talk) 12:51, 29 July 2021 (UTC) This is FPC, not POTD. Your opinion in this discussion had no support. This image is...
Click to read more »destruction of the German Zeppelin Hindenburg. I don't think it's up to FPC quality, even given its age, so I promoted it here, where I think it's a...
Click to read more »filename, excluding "Image:" or "File:" Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »the Obama pic below. I hope the voters here realize the difference between FPC and the Presidential Election (whicht does not start until November by the...
Click to read more »File:Donetsk Regional Admin (City Hall) - Barricades and Balcony.webm for WP:FPC and were wondering whether anybody would be able to provide English-language...
Click to read more »consideration here (if you haven't, though, do nominate it at commons:COM:FPC, where that requirement doesn't exist). I'm not sure if, out of the images...
Click to read more »at the top, admittedly). Any other reason why it shouldn't be listed at FPC? Articles this image appears in Gilbert Strang Creator Sijothankam Suggested...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Oppose. Shall I be first to say it - it's too small according to FPC Criterion 2. There's nothing that bad about the picture, though not sure...
Click to read more »DurovaCharge! 05:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC) I don't know. The previous FPC nom, the non-existent caption in cockroach and the three POTD captions did...
Click to read more »Commons FPC?) Josh Milburn (talk) 07:59, 21 February 2020 (UTC) @J Milburn: I will assume that you legitimately do not understand the purpose of COM:FPC; Commons...
Click to read more »this image is a good illustration of the differences between Commons FPC and this FPC. The EV is that is shows that sand is not a homogenous concept and...
Click to read more »filename, excluding "Image:" or "File:" Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »Funkynusayri (talk) 19:04, 15 January 2008 (UTC) First time? Well, welcome to FPC. Thanks for the nomination. For next time, add your nomination at the top...
Click to read more »real pity, as one of these issues could be partially fixed well-enough for FPC, but not both. mikaultalk 19:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC) I think I could fix...
Click to read more »has significant enc value in Wayne Gretzky it's not likely to succeed at FPC due to bad composition. The hockey stick and the subject's right arm are...
Click to read more »Update "FPCs needing feedback" Edit period(s): Hourly Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: This additional task scans the pages of WP:FPC to generate...
Click to read more »attractive and artistic depiction of the bridge but I would doubt its chances at FPC. The location of the sun takes out a lot of detail of the bridge itself,...
Click to read more »It has come to my attention that the above users may be votestacking in FPC debates where the suspected sockpuppeteer's images are being debated. More...
Click to read more »by Brandmeister[t] 19:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC) Comments Seconder Conclusion Nominated at FPC. See this. Makeemlighter (talk) 02:57, 26 April 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »period ends on 31 Jan 2024 at 13:04:50 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unannimously. Articles in which this...
Click to read more »quality and have good EV. However I personally doubt this would pass at FPC. Photos 'looking down' on the subject rarely have the ideal aesthetics, especially...
Click to read more »already passed Commons QI, VP and just recently FPC, and I feel that the image meets all of the enWP FPC criteria as well. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »filename, excluding "Image:" or "File:" Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »at 03:52:04 (UTC) Reason Saw this at Commons FPC. The high EV composition would be a better match for FPC here than on Commons. (Also the run of animals...
Click to read more »--Tigerhawkvok (talk) 20:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC) Comment -- For some reason, the FPC tag won't take. I suspect it may hve to do with the recent change from the...
Click to read more »better equipment than I have to take macro shots for FPC. I thought jumping up to an SLR would make FPCs possible. However, I have mostly intermediate and...
Click to read more »Reason Not an FPC by present standards. The animal is blurry, there's noise, and the feathers show no detail. Thankfully, "wikipedia's best work" has...
Click to read more »the focus isn't right so doesn't meet FPC criteria. To me this is a perfect candidate for VPC rather than FPC and would support it if I saw it there...
Click to read more »Howcheng Nominated by howcheng {chat} 23:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC) Comments For FPC considerations I think you've hit the nail on the head yourself - the cutoff...
Click to read more »steadicam with it's operator, unfortunately this wouldn't stand much chance at FPC due to the lighting. The operator and camera itself are all shadows, but...
Click to read more »conveying some sense of scale goes. I think 10 is a great image, but not really FPC material since one can't see anything but a sign. Hope that narrows it down...
Click to read more »something to put up at FPC. I'd even be willing to stitch the images if you don't have any software to do that. Also, I'm not a Commons FPC regular, but they...
Click to read more »Suggested by JovianEye (talk) 00:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC) Comments Seconder Conclusion Nominated at FPC. Makeemlighter (talk) 08:54, 11 April 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Reason Excellent encyclopedic value. It's doing well in its FPC nom on commons. Articles this image appears in Mustard (condiment) Creator Rainer Zenz...
Click to read more »justified, maybe from the aesthetic value. Another pic I'd rather see at commons FPC. --Dschwen 17:14, 19 December 2005 (UTC) I dunno, it might make a good comparison...
Click to read more »than optimal. Size and quality aren't great. Suggest it would fare badly at FPC. Haven't looked at the others. --jjron (talk) 15:46, 21 July 2010 (UTC) Images...
Click to read more »period ends on 19 Oct 2022 at 11:15:46 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »displayed as images in the gallery, have restricted article usage, etc (FPC would be unlikely to allow this though). Some of these images have huge EV...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2022 at 16:47:27 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously. Good drone image. Articles...
Click to read more »filename, excluding "Image:" or "File:" Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »Comments Sorry, while this is a pretty photo it isn't likely to succeed at FPC. It's too small for starters - while it technically just scrapes into the...
Click to read more »--jjron (talk) 14:05, 18 July 2010 (UTC) Yeah, I think suggesting it in FPC would make the critics there start snarling. I was wondering if anyone else...
Click to read more »caption is cohesive, and the image is of high enough quality to fit under the FPC. Articles this image appears in Greater Crested Tern Creator Glen Fergus...
Click to read more »ends on 17 May 2023 at 10:32:42 (UTC) Reason Currently unopposed on Commons FPC. Illustrates article well. Articles in which this image appears Lime (fruit)...
Click to read more »unusable as such. --Janke | Talk 08:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC) What are we using the FPC captions for? Genuine query, I've never seen them used anywhere but in the...
Click to read more »of a World Heritage Site was seen on Commons FPC last month where it was featured 15-1. Some in that FPC preferred the alternative, so it has also been...
Click to read more »Nominated by Arustleund (talk) 01:46, 26 August 2009 (UTC) Comments Seconder Nominated at FPC by Arustleund. --jjron (talk) 07:45, 29 August 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Kyle Cassidy. I'm nominating it here for a second opinion- I wonder whether FPC may not prefer a portrait that focuses more on the faces of the subject,...
Click to read more »period ends on 19 Oct 2022 at 11:09:23 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »September 2006 (UTC) Image already nominated, still going through process on WP:FPC. Closing this duplicate nomination. -- Moondigger 20:13, 14 September 2006...
Click to read more »far more detail (although it does have its own issues, addressed its own FPC), and its not as if the image is unrepeatable (the US Navy carries out firing...
Click to read more »I came across this image while browsing Wikipedia and, as many of these FPCs go, I was surprised it wasn't featured yet (probably because it's so new)...
Click to read more »Mbz1 speciality! My gut feeling though is that this would not do so well on FPC, as some other images along these lines have struggled there. I find the...
Click to read more »18:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC) I'd like to think that would be the case, but FPC is pretty brutal of late and I suspect what it would actually generate is...
Click to read more »the black borders would've been edited out had the pictures gone through FPC. Redquark 19:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC) Speedy Delist The nice thing about photos...
Click to read more »12:00, 2 July 2020 (UTC) @Charlesjsharp: I'd say that's less of an issue at FPC, and more of something that needs done before POTD. Given we're in the middle...
Click to read more »Center is barely even a stub -- if you want the photo to have a chance as a FPC, I'd suggest fleshing it out, with such info as who Mr. Clark is/was, who...
Click to read more »Rotorua. Please provide your input on the suitability of this picture being FPC and maybe FP. Nominate and support. - antilived T | C 07:34, 26 October 2006...
Click to read more »16:41, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Comments Comment. Not quite focused enough for FPC, but certainly a valuable and well-composed image. Spikebrennan (talk) 14:04...
Click to read more »This FPC original version is crop, but the FPC alternate version is uncropped, so good bye FPC alternate version. Sorry, please promote the FPC original...
Click to read more »added digitally) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:26, 25 February 2015 (UTC) But FPC is not the place to address copyright concerns. Samsara 20:42, 25 February...
Click to read more »Sep 2014 at 13:32:05 (UTC) File:La Foto. Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »22:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC) I moved this from the bottom to the top of the FPC page (note instructions). This is rather smaller than our stated minimum...
Click to read more »Joopercoopers (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC) Comments Too quiet in here - taken to WP:FPC. --Joopercoopers (talk) 23:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC) Seconder...
Click to read more »poorly lighted.--Dakota ~ ° 03:35, 10 April 2006 (UTC) Oppose Why is this in FPC! Sorry to be a bit gritty but didn't the proposer ever look at the standard...
Click to read more »Cadena).jpg ( FPC - Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Las Limas Monument 1) not promoted 2006-08-07: img:Lake Texcoco c 1519 .png (FPC nom) not promoted...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2023 at 10:13:48 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »07:18:10 (UTC) File:The image filename Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »slightly). I'm also not sure about having a group of images going through FPC together and oppose procedurally as per Trialsanderrors. —Pengo 00:15, 8...
Click to read more »that its small resolution (less than the 1000px limit) would really hurt it FPC. Do you have a higher res version? - (Giligone (talk) 14:28, 5 September...
Click to read more »ends on 28 Sep 2022 at 10:52:59 (UTC) Reason Currently unopposed on Commons FPC, illustrates subject well. Articles in which this image appears Juniper berry...
Click to read more »embryo. However, it probably needs converting to svg before submitting to FPC, and I don't have a clue how to do that... Articles this image appears in...
Click to read more »apparently never went through the FPC process. User:Fabiform gave it {{FeaturedPicture}} back in October, but no FPC process appear, the pic is also linked...
Click to read more »transferred my edit to Commons (hope you don't mind). My biggest concerns at FPC would probably be that the size is getting towards the small size, and while...
Click to read more »14:32:19 (UTC) File:The image filename Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »thirty or so that I found that stand the best chance of passing through the FPC process (by which I mean there are no people obstructing the objects, no...
Click to read more »скоморохъ 20:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC) Comments It's probably won't succeed at FPC in its current state because the sky is very noisy/artifacted and the resolution...
Click to read more »artifacting in the sky, interesting but not unreproducible, doesn't even have an {{FPC}} tag on the image page.. Nominate and delist. - —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 15:30...
Click to read more »support. - Lycaon 12:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC) Comments: Seconder: Very sharp and highly informative. Try it at FPC. Digon3 16:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »new resolution, although I am considering withdrawing it and sending it to FPC.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:19, 13 June 2010 (UTC) 1243x1536...
Click to read more »File:Clifton suspension bridge edit 1 Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »Brandmeister[t] 20:37, 20 April 2010 (UTC) Conclusion Needs restored for FPC. Makeemlighter (talk) 06:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC) Good photograph Articles this...
Click to read more »WP:WPARCHWP:WPARCH Shortcut WP:ARCHWP:ARCH edit Portal subpages - WP:FAC → FA ° WP:FPC → FP - C:FP - WP:PR - WP:GA candidates → SA → archive ° candidates →...
Click to read more »Low placement in one article, not really liking the composition, probably wouldn't pass FPC. Nezzadar [SPEAK] 00:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Seconder...
Click to read more »Reason Apart from fulfilling FPC requirements, this photograph is unique in sense that to my knowledge there is no photograph on the web showing a Dandelion...
Click to read more »that use this image Previous nomination/s Link/s to the image's original FPC nomination, and any previous delist noms Nominator Thanks, Hadseys (talk)...
Click to read more »by Bilby (talk) 06:19, 7 July 2010 (UTC) Comments I doubt this would pass FPC. This is a nice way to illustrate the article, but I think the joystick (excluding...
Click to read more »through as a highly viewed DYK. This article seemed to be close to passing at FPC so I brought it here. Articles this image appears in Sandi Jackson Creator...
Click to read more »user has 17 contributions, all of which (except for two to Flower) are to FPC or that image; and I just don't think it's a FP quality picture. I'd be happy...
Click to read more »Nominated by Victorrocha (talk) 04:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Comments Seconder Nominated at FPC by victorrocha. --jjron (talk) 16:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Traveler100 Suggested by Traveler100 (talk) 10:21, 15 April 2012 (UTC) Comments Now been thru FPC here. --jjron (talk) 14:22, 25 May 2012 (UTC) Seconder...
Click to read more »18:35:45 (UTC) File:The image filename Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »Although, I am not very sure about the quality. Nominated by Dengero (talk) 00:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Comments Seconder Taken to FPC Dengero (talk)...
Click to read more »a previous jimbo picture failing FPC. Noodle snacks (talk) 10:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC) I will support this at FPC because of the EV --Muhammad(talk)...
Click to read more »excellent resolution. Have added#2 to the FPC title so I wouldn't have to overwrite an older (failed) FPC nom of the same species. Articles this image...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Comments Hurricane pics aren't exactly flavour of the month at FPC after what I'd best describe as a hurricane image 'spamming' of the page...
Click to read more »retouching by Banzoo Suggested by Banzoo (talk) 02:07, 27 September 2009 (UTC) Comments Seconder Nominated at FPC. --jjron (talk) 13:24, 10 October 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »perspective correction, noise reduction for the sky, etc – but to be frank, for FPC it would be better to reshoot it just before dark, rather than at night....
Click to read more »22:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC) User has only 6 edits - four of which are on FPC the other two on his userpage --Fir0002 22:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC) Can...
Click to read more »Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics article is more qualified for FPC than this image. If you would like to nominate a picture of this building...
Click to read more »this but the filetype is inappropriate. I'm unsure as to the chances, as we're more rigorous than COM:FPC. MER-C 08:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC) Seconder...
Click to read more »06:00:50 (UTC) File:Foggynightatlahore Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »looking for constructive feedback to perhaps get this (and future) to a FPC quality image. Thanks. Nominated by Justinmorris (talk) 22:33, 2 March 2008...
Click to read more »equation. Beyond that I'm not entirely sure what to make of this in terms of FPC. Without doing the calculations I'll assume it's accurate and informative...
Click to read more »support. I get the feeling this one ain't gonna pass though. According to FPC standards these days, I guess I just have to freeze time and the wind when...
Click to read more »arguments about translation, while good for convenience, don't apply in FPC -- we often see the argument that other encyclopedias find an image valuable...
Click to read more »well-known illusion and especially to Grid illusion. We also have a few other FP/FPC optical illusions (e.g. Image:Optical.greysquares.arp.jpg and Image:Wikidec2005cani...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2022 at 15:20:00 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously. Rare example of good science...
Click to read more »05:23:51 (UTC) File:The image filename Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »(stained with eosine color). Besides, smaller than accepted minimum for FPC. --Janke | Talk 13:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC) I'm not sure what you mean about...
Click to read more »Dean Franklin Suggested by Cowtowner 05:20, 18 September 2009 (UTC) Comments Seconder Nominated at FPC. --jjron (talk) 13:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »couple of WP articles. Its nomination recently had modest support at WP:FPC. Articles this image appears in Gary Sinise, Lt. Dan Band Creator Dschwen...
Click to read more »encyclopedia. Keep it up. Anyway, I don't really think I would support this at FPC, it's really only a foot. A detailed image of the actual image would be great...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2022 at 16:50:57 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »at 1633 × 1735 pixels this is technically large enough for a shot through FPC. TomStar81 (Talk) 01:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC) speedy close this troll nom -...
Click to read more »added as a to FPC to generate more discussion This map is pretty good and detailed. I'm thinking about nominating this one for a WP:FPC or a WP:VPC but...
Click to read more »Featured picture, much less a Valued picture. It would probably fail an WP:FPC nomination because of it's quality, but I think it is of large enough encyclopedic...
Click to read more »Reason clear enough to meets the FPC criteria and should be featured Articles this image appears in Indian Peafowl Creator PRA Support as nominator --Alokprasad84...
Click to read more »filename, excluding "Image:" or "File:" Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:43, 31 August 2009 (UTC) Comments I don't think this will pass at FPC due to motion blur (or lack of sharpening) but this definitely has EV for...
Click to read more »period ends on 26 Jan 2022 at 19:03:14 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC in October last year, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which...
Click to read more »03:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Seconder I've gone ahead and nominated for FPC on the restored version. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Durova (talk...
Click to read more »Support But perhaps a bit dark. Also, Greg, it isn't called POTDC, its called FPC (this is a general comment). Noodle snacks (talk) 06:10, 3 August 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »artistic and technical merit, in that the photo (in my opinion) meets the FPC criteria as well as presents an incredible image of its own accord. Aesthetically...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Comments Seconder Yes, this is worth a nomination. Add it to WP:FPC-Fcb981(talk:contribs) 06:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC) Added, see...
Click to read more »this image appears lavender Creator Jiyang Chen Oppose I have corrected the FPC link in this nom, as it originally pointed here. The image caption needs...
Click to read more »colour balance of the promoted edit, leading to a lengthy discussion on the FPC talk page, which in turn resulted in the FP being delisted. Please note that...
Click to read more »page? Chick Bowen 21:03, 3 May 2009 (UTC) Because Durova messed up the {{FPC}} template. :P Fixed. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 12:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Oops, thank...
Click to read more »1492 Suggested by Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC) Comments Already been thru FPC here. --jjron (talk) 14:19, 25 May 2012 (UTC) Seconder...
Click to read more »Very nice photo, but I honestly doubt it is high enough quality to pass at FPC. Size is small (at 1200 x 800 it does meet requirements, but bigger is usually...
Click to read more »(UTC) Reason It's time to start promoting for 2020. Was seen on Commons FPC a couple of weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Comments It's a cool picture, but I don't think it warrants a FPC for two reasons. It's fairly grainy, and also, what exactly is the encyclopedic...
Click to read more »(UTC) P.S. This is an FPC that would have been better put Picture Peer Review to deal with this kind of issue before coming to the FPC list, in my opinion...
Click to read more »December 2008 (UTC) Comments Personally I would doubt the chances of this at FPC. Firstly it's used to illustrate Mother, yet the focus is clearly on the...
Click to read more »votes. Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2010 at 13:53:17 (UTC) Reason Current FPC on Commons, but I thought it deserved a nomination here, too. Great action...
Click to read more »Applanation tonometry. Any feedback on whether it deserves to be in the FPC list? This picture comes in the article Tonometry Nominate and support. -...
Click to read more »LordHarris 19:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Comments: Give this one a try in the FPC. there are some blown highlights on the right roof and the foreground tree...
Click to read more »seem to feel very strongly about it; if so, by all means nominate it at FPC, you don't have to wait for the approval of anyone here. By no means am I...
Click to read more »appears in Mitt Romney, as well as in 24 others Creator Jessica Rinaldi, FPC per Eustress Support as nominator --Eustress (talk) 05:35, 14 January 2009...
Click to read more »informative. Tim Vickers (talk) 18:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Seconder Nominated at FPC by Juliancolton. --jjron (talk) 08:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »31 January 2009 (UTC) Comments This picture is not likely to succeed at FPC because of some uniform and very prominent weirdness and CCD blooming. That...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comments Hehe, it's not from the US. --jjron (talk) 07:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC) Seconder Taken to FPC. DurovaCharge! 00:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Doesn't matter, whether you agree with it or not, the lead of WP:FPC cleary says: "anonymous votes are generally disregarded". Armbrust The Homunculus...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2025 at 22:41:00 (UTC) Reason Reccomendation in FPC in Commons, it has EV Articles in which this image appears Carlota Ferreira...
Click to read more »there's a lot of appealing elements in this picture, it would not pass at FPC for a number of reasons. Probably the biggest issue is to do with composition...
Click to read more »then at least in practice because many editors (even those not involved in FPC) do revert removal of FPs on the basis of them being featured. Ðiliff «»...
Click to read more »March 2011 (UTC) Comment: This is a beautiful collection, but I do not think FPC is the right place to honour it; there simply doesn't exist a mechanism to...
Click to read more »filename, excluding "Image:" or "File:" Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »Blake's original works exist, and this is, while not as big as I'd prefer for FPC (slightly under recommended size), still decently sized, with sufficient...
Click to read more »hard to find a photograph like that again which will be free. It's in the FPC but the Caption which can be fixed. Articles this image appears in Spinalonga...
Click to read more »standing man's head is all bent. It probably doesn't have much of a chance at WP:FPC. sorry. Intothewoods29 (talk) 05:29, 14 September 2008 (UTC) Seconder...
Click to read more »Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC) Unfortunately, on Commons FPC, it has been noted that the image is cropped. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:41...
Click to read more »Stockholm article. Good image though it's rather grainy, would it survive as a FPC? Created by http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Oke Nominate and support...
Click to read more »but I don't know how. If someone else deems it suitable, please add it to FPC on my behalf. Articles this image appears in Scutelleridae Creator Leon-Bojarczuk...
Click to read more »one Durova replaced. Incidentally, the one Durova replaced was put up for FPC last July - see Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Koala sleeping. --jjron...
Click to read more »and support. - Digon3 16:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Comments: Seconder: It has a chance, give it a shot on FPC. -Fcb981 01:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »run the same day. DurovaCharge! 03:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Nominated at FPC as Priapus statuette by Spikebrennan on 27 Jan, 2008. --jjron (talk) 08:19...
Click to read more »contribs • count) has no article namespace edits, 5 edits in total, all FPC related. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:47, 18 March 2007 (UTC) Oppose - grainy, very...
Click to read more »with a little better composition and a lot less glare would make a great FPC.--Niro5 13:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Oppose Nice subject, encyclopedic, but...
Click to read more »17:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC) Comments The composition is messy eg cars. For FPC, I don't think it would do well. --Muhammad(talk) 20:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and nobody noticed until now because the blank page didn't show up on the FPC main page. I'll archive it now with the anon's text copied below. Raven4x4x...
Click to read more »I'm not sure how these would go on FPC since the body is cut off, the left-most one is currently on Com:qic and Com:fpc and seems to be going OK, But I would...
Click to read more »The scene is very poignant, as per nom, but this will get ripped apart on FPC due to quality issues. It's a low resolution image filled with JPEG artifacts...
Click to read more »couple of WP articles. Its nomination recently had modest support at WP:FPC. Articles this image appears in Gary Sinise, Lt. Dan Band Creator Dschwen...
Click to read more »which although unavoidable, still doesn't help the picture's chances at FPC. What this picture has going for it is the strangeness of subject matter...
Click to read more »Geronimo Codex Mendoza (failed FPC nom) Harry Houdini (failed FPC nom)I'm working on it. ~~~~ Andrew Johnson (failed FPC nom) Isambard Kingdom Brunel Japanese...
Click to read more »diminish the subject, Pangong Lake. Also, I would like to remind you that under FPC we are to judge the photograph itself, not the medium. (Ref: "It's a lake...
Click to read more »20:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC) Seconder Archived 21:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC) by Rambo's Revenge (talk) so it can added as a to FPC to generate more discussion...
Click to read more »are not relevant to English language Wiki FPC (just as use on English Wiki shouldn't be relevant to Russian FPC). --jjron (talk) 12:48, 13 March 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and thought this might be informative and pleasing enough to nominate for FPC. However, I'm not very familiar with the good-color standards, and am not...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2021 at 12:19:18 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC two months ago, where it was featured unanimously. Lead image in a FA. Articles...
Click to read more »higher-quality version of an image that has been up for a decade (and had been at FPC unsuccessfully in 2010); if you believe such decision was erroneous and negatively...
Click to read more »picture for delisting Previous nomination/s Link/s to the image's original FPC nomination, and any previous delist noms Nominator Amckern (talk) Delist...
Click to read more »seems to be a bit overexposed. I personally don't think it would have much chance at FPC. Sorry. --jjron (talk) 13:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Seconder...
Click to read more »support. Ackatsis 08:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC) Comments It was nominated for FPC about a month ago and was demolished - see here. --jjron 13:33, 11 November...
Click to read more »weather's not ideal, it seems to have been taken around twilight and I know at FPC someone would have a problem with that tugboat, but otherwise great angle...
Click to read more »very good. Not upto standards with current FPs Previous nomination/s AT FPC Nominator Muhammad(talk) Delist — Muhammad(talk) 02:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(Failed FPC) Lewis Hamilton (McLaren), 2008 Australian Grand Prix (Failed FPC) Rubens Barrichello (Honda), 2008 Japanese Grand Prix (Failed FPC) Mark Webber...
Click to read more »(UTC) In the commons. As far as I know, few Wikipedia FPC voters also vote in the commons FPC. As for the pictures, I think this version is the best...
Click to read more »Comments Doesn't seem to have a sharp focus and the road on the left is distracting, unlikely pass FPC or VPC. — raekyT 13:12, 25 July 2010 (UTC) Seconder...
Click to read more »is blown. Significant chromatic aberration on the trees Won't succeed at FPC for these reasons. I'd try it at VPC, but you might get opposed for the distortion...
Click to read more »nomination had only one vote! --Bridgecross 14:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC) Delist FPC sure has come a long ways since that first archive.. -Fcb981(talk:contribs)...
Click to read more »Just a note, the image that was the subject of this FPC was deleted, at the request of the uploader following some concerns raised by another user. Because...
Click to read more »Suggested by Jaguar 20:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC) Comments This will not pass at FPC. The statue is completely in silhouette. There appears to be significant...
Click to read more »An image of cultural and historic value, would like to put it through for FPC Creator Frances Benjamin Johnston Nominated by Jordan Contribs 12:07, 24...
Click to read more »18:26, 14 April 2006 (UTC) Oppose Here we go again, what's happening to FPC! Very low standard pics are common now. Weird colours, fuzzy, no contrast...
Click to read more »to wikipedia. I think that while this is a current high-profile image at FPC, its use on wikipedia should be further evaluated and it should be considered...
Click to read more »horizontally or vertically. This one is 449 by 197 pixels. So there's no point in putting it up for FPC - Adrian Pingstone 16:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »important woman. This more medieval style isn't something we see a lot at FPC", said nominator J Milburn. The image is from a set gathered by User:Dcoetzee...
Click to read more »page has been created in 2010 it was never actually transcluded onto the FPC page. It is a clear diagram so I thought it deserves some feedback. --ELEKHHT...
Click to read more »the light emphasises the material of the sculpture. At a previous failed FPC nomination it has been suggested it should be nominated as a VP. Articles...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2021 at 12:08:57 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC this month, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »ends on 26 Apr 2011 at 14:09:48 (UTC) Reason why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first) Articles in which...
Click to read more »period ends on 23 Jun 2021 at 16:33:53 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »period ends on 22 Jun 2022 at 08:35:37 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this...
Click to read more »October 2010 (UTC) Agree with IdLoveOne. Haziness would likely prevent passing at FPC or VPC. Jujutacular talk 19:32, 2 November 2010 (UTC) Seconder...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2021 at 16:13:24 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC this month, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »(talk) 14:03, 31 August 2010 (UTC) Comments I don't think this would pass FPC, the resolution seems low. --I'ḏ♥One 06:43, 3 September 2010 (UTC) Resolution...
Click to read more »it's a view from across the Hudson River. Currently passing at Commons FPC. Articles in which this image appears Hudson Yards (development) FP category...
Click to read more »that use this image Previous nomination/s link(s) to the image's original FPC nomination, and any previous delist noms Nominator – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2020 at 19:37:18 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this...
Click to read more »encyclopedic contributions "crap" because they do not meet your interpretation of FPC or FSC criteria does not further the goals of the project. This isn't Fark...
Click to read more »(talk) 06:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Comments: Unfortunately this is not really FPC material. there is some stiched tilt mainly on the left side. The picture...
Click to read more »Importantly, the subject is not properly identified - this alone is enough to scuttle any prospect FPC. MER-C 09:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC) Seconder...
Click to read more »period ends on 26 Dec 2020 at 12:19:22 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC this month, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »higher-quality version of File:RedArrows01.jpg is the type of shot that would have a chance at FPC. Makeemlighter (talk) 02:31, 24 September 2010 (UTC) Seconder...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2021 at 16:59:05 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »off on both edges and covered by trees in most of the view. Sorry, not for FPC. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 21:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Not promoted MER-C...
Click to read more »good quality. In several articles. I think it might have a chance at WP:FPC. When you nominate, make sure to emphasize how famous the photo is and the...
Click to read more »needed. I'd give it a FP try. — raeky (talk | edits) 17:41, 25 September 2009 (UTC) Seconder Nominated at FPC. --jjron (talk) 13:26, 10 October 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »infromation. You could try submitting it as an FPC on commons, they usually go for more artsy type stuff where as FPC on wikipedia is more for stuff that is encyclopedic...
Click to read more »--—Chris! ct 22:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Comment I would suggest trying this at FPC. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 02:30, 27 March 2009 (UTC) Apparently not. But I...
Click to read more »contribution (and a very interesting artifact), but it would likely struggle FPC. If you want, give it a try at QI. Thegreenj 22:47, 6 July 2008 (UTC) I appreciate...
Click to read more »involvement in the Queen Elizabeth II Bridge and Dartford articles, rather than FPC, and his review doesn't necessarily correspond to our usual criteria and...
Click to read more »somewhat distracting. Oppose I think it's a good idea to submit photos to FPC on Commons to get the photo quality endorsed, then we can assess EV here...
Click to read more »Loves You and Died for you!† 18:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Seconder Nominated at both FPC and VPC by ZooFari. --jjron (talk) 14:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »through. :) Intothewoods29 (talk) 16:03, 17 September 2008 (UTC) Seconder Nominated at FPC by Spikebrennan. --jjron (talk) 12:36, 12 October 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »being delisted. I am posting it here for advice on if it has a chance on the FPC. It is used in the article Habanero where it replaced the old overexposed...
Click to read more »makes Fir a prolific contributor, benefitting all of Wikipedia, not only FPC. --Janke | Talk 14:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC) I disagree on a number of points...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) But it is applicable to FPC! ;-) --Janke | Talk 10:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC) No. It is not applicable to FPC. You are mixing naturism with nudity...
Click to read more »period ends on 15 Jan 2020 at 06:24:30 (UTC) Reason Was seen at Commons FPC two months ago, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2023 at 16:50:34 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »by Harrison49 (talk) 19:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Comments Too small for FPC. Exceptions can be made, but you'd have to show that this image is unique...
Click to read more »Pericles of AthensTalk 12:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC) Comments Seconder Nominated at FPC by PericlesofAthens. --jjron (talk) 06:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »period ends on 22 Sep 2022 at 19:26:49 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this...
Click to read more »period ends on 15 Nov 2022 at 19:14:21 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this...
Click to read more »period ends on 28 Jul 2021 at 18:38:17 (UTC) Reason Was just seen on Commons FPC, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image appears...
Click to read more »much the same (see instructions). You create a subpage and add it to the FPC page. However, I'm not so impressed by this pic. This might show a few hoodoos...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2022 at 19:26:52 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »period ends on 21 Jul 2021 at 18:21:33 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2021 at 11:56:56 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this...
Click to read more »(UTC) I’m going to be honest, is this really needed? It’s irrelevant to the FPC process, and retaliatory opposing is 100% not how it’s done here. Pinging...
Click to read more »too qualified, Aaadddaaammm. I use the term “stop, stare, and click” for FPCs. If the animation is self-running and you stop and stare and read the caption—and...
Click to read more »invasive birds. I was wondering if anyone else thinks this could pass at FPC when everyone isn't sick of bird images anymore. Articles this image appears...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2022 at 16:25:10 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC this month, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2022 at 17:18:18 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »September 2008 (UTC) Comments This picture is wayyy too small to make it at FPC. Is this the only copy? (Giligone (talk) 15:48, 6 September 2008 (UTC)) Yep...
Click to read more »information that sets it apart from any most other maps. Image mapping is not FPC-reviewable as it's wikicode written into the article, and nothing to do with...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2022 at 15:42:54 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this...
Click to read more »feedback about the quality, and whether it might need restoration to pass FPC (things I don't feel I can assess yet with an image like this). Mostlyharmless...
Click to read more »period ends on 12 Jun 2021 at 18:58:47 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comments Very noisy even at small sizes; wouldn't have a chance at FPC for this reason, but maybe VPC, though I'm not that convinced. Just a note...
Click to read more »period ends on 19 Dec 2020 at 16:34:02 (UTC) Reason Currently on Commons FPC, where it is likely it will be promoted. Articles in which this image appears...
Click to read more »period ends on 27 Jul 2022 at 15:05:57 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this...
Click to read more »Personally this is a very good render. Alone I believe it wouldn't pass FPC A whole chess board rendered would have much more encyclopedic value and...
Click to read more »you could lose that cut off shadow on the right. For a replaceable image, FPC reviewers generally expect more. MER-C 07:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC) Seconder...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2022 at 11:21:21 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC this month, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2022 at 19:26:52 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »Reason HQ image, illustrates article well, currently unopposed on Commons FPC. Articles in which this image appears Bala shark FP category for this image...
Click to read more »Looks good to me! - Enuja (talk) 01:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC) Nominated at FPC by User:Enuja on 5 January 2008 as San Francisco earthquake fire. --jjron...
Click to read more »that article, including this one. It might be nice to get it cleaned up a little but so far it might pass FPC. --I'ḏ♥One 06:20, 3 September 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »familiar with commons, but please make sure you become familiar with en:FPC before delisting, particularly mass delisting as it doesn't look like you...
Click to read more »undid it in the german FPC nomination. The grass is better in the reverted version so it isn't entirely the same as the one in the fpc nom. Therefore its...
Click to read more »period ends on 20 Jul 2022 at 18:40:25 (UTC) Reason Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously. Articles in which this image...
Click to read more »It just looks very natural and to me it meets 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8th of W:FPC. Articles this image appears in Cherry Creator Gulmammad Support as nominator...
Click to read more »