Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcuts WP:FRINGEWP:FRINGE WP:FRNGWP:FRNG...
Click to read more »([261], [262], [263], [264]) Violation of WP:CONSENSUS, WP:EDITWARRING, WP:FRNG and WP:V in the article Balkars (edit | talk | history | links | watch |...
Click to read more »theories; they merit mentioning in Wikipedia as long as they adhere to WP:FRNG. John Hyams (talk) 23:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC) Well, as dougweller pointed...
Click to read more »notability as a scholar, without the color-commentary about how he is notable. WP:FRNG will be dealt with later. Ignocrates (talk) 17:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC) Did...
Click to read more »compliance with WP:FRNG; removing it would eliminate the only noticeboard specifically designated for ensuring compliance with WP:FRNG and dilute its discussions...
Click to read more »connection between the Japanese and Korean languages, so I decided to add the WP:FRNG template. — me Maybe I was wrong to put Template:Fringe theories on the whole...
Click to read more »the reality. Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 01:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC) WP:FRNG "a Wikipedia article should not make a fringe theory appear more notable...
Click to read more »all the way, which gives more validity to its substance, however viewed as FRNG or not). Check the material added to the other pages below 11, and please...
Click to read more »205.97.61 (talk) 03:15, 8 January 2025 (UTC) Eh, you can say "That's WP:FRNG and WP:PSCI and does not constitute due weight as the subject is discussed...
Click to read more »