Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
This page is not a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcuts WP:FOOTYNWP:FOOTYN WP:FOOTY/NotabilityWP:FOOTY/Notability...
Click to read more »The result was keep. Consensus exists that the subject meets the essay WP:FOOTYN. However, it is reasonable to re-nominate the article on the basis of WP:GNG...
Click to read more »which does not pass WP:FOOTYN. Onel5969 TT me 16:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC) Club plays in the national cup and thus passes WP:FOOTYN. User:apple20674 16:45...
Click to read more »more support to keep, the delete opinions are more in line with policy. WP:FOOTYN, which applies to teams as opposed to WP:FOOTY, is an essay and can not...
Click to read more »on FOOTYN can be given very limited weight. If this an accepted argument for European clubs, then the community should consider elevating FOOTYN to a...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Keep per WP:FOOTYN. If somebody from WikiProject Football could take this on and find good...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN and was tagged as a WP:GNG concern two months ago; the best source is the...
Click to read more »this does not meet WP:GNG or the relevant WikiProject football essay WP:FOOTYN, and that thus we should redirect. I'd also like to rebut the argument made...
Click to read more »for the national cup or the country's top division. Appears to fail WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. – Kosm1fent 09:51, 24 May 2012 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »important. FOOTYN might be outdated and an essay, but its principles still apply here, the FFA cup is regional until the round of 32, by FOOTYN, it is only...
Click to read more »football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:21, 23 July 2018 (UTC) Keep passes WP:FOOTYN as per this and They are playing in 2017–18 Kuwaiti Division One .Pharaoh...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN as this club has not played in the country' national cup. Fails GNG this...
Click to read more »(FAS) nor part of the football pyramid. Regarding "assumed to meet WP:FOOTYN", WP:FOOTYN clearly states assumed non-notability unless it meets broader WP:N...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable local football club per WP:FOOTYN. Apparently it only played at national level once. Markussep Talk 06:03...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was speedy keep. Clearly notable per WP:FOOTYN and historic AfD consensus. No need to keep this open for purely administrative...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet the WP:FOOTYN guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 16:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC) delete as per nom...
Click to read more »eventually managed to make sense of this discussion and understand the 'FOOTYN' and 'NFOOTY' references that were thrown around in abundance! Daniel (talk)...
Click to read more »No claim or evidence of notability, nor of meeting the standards of WP:FOOTYN. The claims it does make are contradictory, a professional club in an amateur...
Click to read more »national league (just an amateur, intermediate, regional one), so fails WP:FOOTYN. Fails WP:GNG since appears only to have one independent reliable source...
Click to read more »"Local Athens club which has never appeared in a national cup. Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG.", which is still valid. Tag was removed by an anon editor without...
Click to read more »unofficial guideline used at WP:FOOTYN. I can't find any, though." This absurd argument is based on a complete misreading of FOOTYN, which says "Per Wikipedia:Notability...
Click to read more »Passes WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG and also per this and this.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC) Keep - meets WP:FOOTYN as they play...
Click to read more »25 October 2015 (UTC) Keep - cup ... WP:FOOTYN. Nfitz (talk) 01:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC) Keep - meets WP:FOOTYN. Fenix down (talk) 09:34, 26 October 2015...
Click to read more »GiantSnowman 09:35, 18 June 2011 (UTC) Delete - fails both WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. GiantSnowman 09:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC) Delete. Non notable team. Argyle...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. FOOTYN determines which subjects can be assumed to meet GNG. Once challenged, however...
Click to read more »club participated in the 2010–11 Kup Srbije (Serbian Cup), thus meeting WP:FOOTYN. However, the club did not participate in that tournament, nor can I find...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Fails WP:FOOTYN NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 05:21, 1 July 2010 (UTC) Club Cultural Casma...
Click to read more »soccer club that competes in the "Central Coast Premier League 1". Fails WP:FOOTYN, as far as I can see. --sparkl!sm hey! 12:54, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »WP:GNG or WP:ORG. Redirect was reverted with the rationale it clearly met WP:FOOTYN, although their is no indication that this club ever played for the national...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't seem to pass WP:FOOTYN and the entire article is just sourced to the club website. There doesn't...
Click to read more »not apply, as that refers to individuals. We can, however, refer to WP:FOOTYN, WP:ORG, and WP:GNG, which this club currently fails. — Jkudlick tcs 18:02...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Club which doesn't meet either WP:FOOTYN or WP:CORPDEPTH. Was deleted four years ago, and the only thing which has...
Click to read more »Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN easily too. Bettia (rawr CRUSH!) 14:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Comment. But does it? According to WP:FOOTYN one is notable if one...
Click to read more »WP:NFOOTBALL is only for players. Not sure this article whether passes WP:FOOTYN or not, so let' s discuss it on AfD, thanks! Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:04,...
Click to read more »Non-professional clubs (will be adding several more), who don't pass WP:FOOTYN. Onel5969 TT me 17:50, 20 August 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:NCORP. Sources are primary and I am unable to locate significant...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) A low-notability sports club which doesn't meet WP:NCORP or WP:FOOTYN. No coverage in reliable sources, and has not played in the FFA Cup or prior...
Click to read more »Contested PROD. Reason for PROD was "Non-notable amateur club per WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN". The article creator contested the PROD with the reason "It is a noted...
Click to read more »08:58, 8 June 2011 (UTC) Keep. Passes WP:FOOTYN. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 16:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC) Keep. Passes WP:FOOTYN per having played in a national cup. -...
Click to read more »PROD. Concern was Article about a football club that fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason...
Click to read more »Montfoort in the Dutch national cup that makes Alphense Boys notable by WP:FOOTYN, I request the closing person also to undelete VV Montfoort that was unjustifiably...
Click to read more »with argument being "team that fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG, also fails WP:FOOTYN". PROD removed without explanation. I know that the notability of these...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Amateur football club which does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:FOOTYN. Onel5969 TT me 14:51, 5 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »doesn't satisfy the requirements of WP:FOOTYN -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:FOOTYN Jenuk1985 | Talk 13:46, 3 March 2009...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN as he never played nor coached at top level. Coverage is only of his death...
Click to read more »Contested PROD. Reason for PROD was "Non-notable amateur club per WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN". PROD was contested with no reason given. Viribus Unitis have never played...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet the requirements of WP:FOOTYN#Club notability Cabayi (talk) 11:02, 8 October 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »meets WP:FOOTYN presumed notability because of competing in the national cup Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:19, 16 April 2021 (UTC) Keep, meets FOOTYN as per...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet the requirements of WP:FOOTYN#Club notability Cabayi (talk) 11:02, 8 October 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Was previously deleted as he failed WP:FOOTYN notability. Fails notability at WP:ATHLETE having never played in a fully...
Click to read more »Redirect - Just about a plausable search term, but the club itself, per WP:FOOTYN has not competed at a sufficiently high level to be independantly notable...
Click to read more »"Obscure football club which has never appeared in a national cup. Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG." Article was restored on the grounds that the team played in...
Click to read more »has not played in the national cup and is not in a WP:FPL, thus fails WP:FOOTYN. Club has not garnered significant coverage to meet requirements of WP:N...
Click to read more »April 2012 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable university team. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »was delete. Consensus is this fails WP:GNG due to lack of sources, and WP:FOOTYN because the team hasn't played their first match yet. No reason it can't...
Click to read more »however. --Bduke (Discussion) 22:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC) Keep applying WP:FOOTYN seems appropriate. The FA Futsal League operates regionally but does appear...
Click to read more »WP:ROUTINE. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 16:09, 28 August 2011 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. – HonorTheKing (talk) 18:15...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:GNG trumps WP:FOOTYN for club notability. With the deletion of Dontan on GNG grounds despite...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »has not played in the national cup and is not in a WP:FPL, thus fails WP:FOOTYN. Club has not garnered significant coverage to meet requirements of WP:N...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable club which doesn't meet the criteria of WP:FOOTYN. PROD was contested because this article was kept at a previous AfD, but...
Click to read more »of notability. GiantSnowman 14:37, 7 August 2018 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »expanded. Xaris333 (talk) 21:24, 12 April 2018 (UTC) Keep appears to meet WP:FOOTYN for playing in the Cypriot Cup on at least eight separate occasions. The...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable amateur club, fails WP:FOOTYN. Onel5969 TT me 23:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »side. The Whispering Wind (talk) 03:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC) Keep - WP:FOOTYN requires that the player has played for "Have played for a fully professional...
Click to read more »appearances in a fully professional league, fails both WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. Angelo (talk) 18:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC) This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »in-depth coverage. KDS4444Talk 07:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC) Keep - per WP:FOOTYN having played in the Albanian second division they have played in a national...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:FOOTYN. Also completely unsourced Mdann52 (talk) 15:18, 29 July 2013 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »(inculding ones below) Haven't participated in national cup therefore fail WP:FOOTYN, nor do they pass WP:GNG. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 08:58, 14 April 2012 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »FOOTYN either, so not sure what a merge would achieve. Fenix down (talk) 14:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC) Comment - The parent article does pass WP:FOOTYN since...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »the national cup, clearly satisfies WP:FOOTYN. gidonb (talk) 00:43, 30 July 2018 (UTC) Keep passes WP:FOOTYN.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:25, 30...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »Cypriot Third Division, which is not a fully professional league. Fails WP:FOOTYN as third division sides play in a lower tier domestic cup tournament. Vanadus...
Click to read more »August 2012 (UTC) Delete - A brief article of a club that clearly fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. League Octopus (League Octopus 10:49, 17 August 2012 (UTC))...
Click to read more »in the page being kept because of a seemingly non-existent clause in WP:FOOTYN (I've been around WikiProject Football for over 5 years and have heard nothing...
Click to read more »Thanks, — Music1201 talk 21:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN has not participated in a national competition to my knowledge. No indication...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Previously deleted. Still fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »if the article meets the criteria for inclusion (WP:BIO, WP:ATHLETE. WP:FOOTYN). If not, nominate it for deletion. See WP:DEL. Find and add sources. Remove...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PROD removed, no reason given. Footballer fails WP:FOOTYN as he has not played at a fully-professional level of football. A lack of...
Click to read more »significant coverage in journalistic publications. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. – Kosm1fent 13:48, 17 September 2012 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. Cloudz679 19:23, 29 January 2012 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 14:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »received significant coverage in reliable sources. Neither does it pass WP:FOOTYN guideline for the notability of football teams as the team has not played...
Click to read more »Contested deletion after author removed PROD. Fails the criteria at WP:FOOTYN and WP:BIO#Athletes as he has never played a professional game. No references...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable amateur football club per WP:FOOTYN. Never participated in national championship, has played in the Fogo island...
Click to read more »example). The club also meets the club notability guidelines laid out at WP:FOOTYN having played in the Lamar Hunt Open Cup. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:24, 28 August...
Click to read more »Piotrus| reply here 06:44, 18 April 2017 (UTC) Delete - Seems to fail WP:FOOTYN no indication club has taken part in a national tournament. Fenix down (talk)...
Click to read more »of the discussion was: Nomination withdrawn. Although the club fails WP:FOOTYN, the file is unrelated to this reason, so I would like to keep this file...
Click to read more »June 2018 (UTC) Question Does Chatham Cup participation not count wrt WP:FOOTYN? Nzd (talk) 07:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC) I have this discussion with someone...
Click to read more »evidence that this player meets WP:FOOTYN. Mosmof (talk) 18:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Non notable fails WP:FOOTYN. Paste (talk) 18:37, 24 November...
Click to read more »article is about a club which has never competed in the FA Cup, failing WP:FOOTYN. It plays in the 13th level of the English football league system and has...
Click to read more »importance/significance: Does not assert notability under WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN RM-Taylor (talk) 23:54, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »international footballers - WP:FOOTYN is an essay and has no official standing. In fact, this is a direct quote from FOOTYN: The player section of this notability...
Click to read more »a fully-professional club or in a FIFA tournament. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN criteria. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:15, 27 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »participated in the 2016 Egypt Cup thus meeting the club notability criteria of WP:FOOTYN. I don't know where user:aunva6 comment of lack of sources comes from -...
Click to read more »notability. GiantSnowman 10:22, 22 January 2018 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »been nothing but a listing of the players. A PROD was declined citing WP:FOOTYN, but even that guideline says that the team has to meet GNG. I don't see...
Click to read more »passes WP:FOOTYN as the club has played in a national competition. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC) Keep Satisfies WP:FOOTYN and WP:NFOOTYCLUB...
Click to read more »tcs 10:55, 17 January 2015 (UTC) Delete – No evidence of meeting the WP:FOOTYN guidelines or WP:GNG. — Jkudlick tcs 10:58, 17 January 2015 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »influence of WP:FOOTBALL which has its own notability guidelines at WP:FOOTYN. The team is objectively notable by those criteria, since it plays in the...
Click to read more »team. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 21:00, 16 June 2011 (UTC) Delete. Does not meet WP:FOOTYN requirements, though if it gets more coverage like this it may meet WP:GNG...
Click to read more »not? If he is, WP:FOOTYN says he's automatically sufficiently notable. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 15:18, 17 September 2011 (UTC) FOOTYN is an essay that carries...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article for a team that fails WP:GNG, also fails WP:FOOTYN as there is no indication that the team has ever played in a national cup...
Click to read more »presumption of notability under WP:FOOTYN #3. It (#3) certainly isn't a settled thing, if you look at the discussions on WP:FOOTYN you can see that, with some...
Click to read more »Concern was Despite the storied history, this club does not appear to meet WP:FOOTYN or WP:N. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:28, 15 March 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »are statistic websites or trivial. Moving on, Kuşadasıspor also fails WP:FOOTYN, as they have never played in the Turkish Cup from what I can tell. However...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN Op47 (talk) 22:50, 23 January 2014 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Footballer who played only 5 games in a league which fails WP:FOOTYN in that it's not listed here, and also per precedence in this discussion...
Click to read more »Delete - Not covered by a subject specific guideline, nor by the essay WP:FOOTYN as this does not refer to futsal. No indication the club has received significant...
Click to read more »Football player in a youth competition who does not meet WP:ATHLETE or WP:FOOTYN Mattinbgn\talk 21:34, 13 December 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Appears to fail WP:FOOTYN, having (as far as I can tell) never played a league game for either Barcelona...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:FOOTYN. at best this team has played 4th division state league. but currently a...
Click to read more »showing team played in a national cup competition that would satisfy WP:FOOTYN. dashiellx (talk) 17:55, 21 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems to fail critarias according to WP:FOOTYN, as Sweden have a cup system. There are no claims supporting notability...
Click to read more »Keep. Per WP:FOOTYN .They have played in the Coupe de France.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:02, 30 July 2018 (UTC) Keep as per WP:FOOTYN - played in...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete: Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 22:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:FOOTYN failure. Number 57 17:40, 3 October...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN. This is a club team in an local amateur league with no assertion of significance...
Click to read more »deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:FOOTYN Club has played in the Irish Cup including the 2020–21 Irish Cup.Pharaoh...
Click to read more »Keep He clearly passes the WP:FOOTYN. Due to the article's name it seems he fails WP:GNG but one should see what WP:FOOTYN says. He played with notable...
Click to read more »that this club has participated in the national cup, therefore failing WP:FOOTYN; also fails WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 16:02, 24 June 2011 (UTC) Delete - There...
Click to read more »has not played in the national cup and is not in a WP:FPL, thus fails WP:FOOTYN. Club has not garnered significant coverage to meet requirements of WP:N...
Click to read more »WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:18, 11 March 2012 (UTC) Comment. This is a clear example of the systemic bias ingrained by WP:FOOTYN. That...
Click to read more »(View log) Young Spanish footballer who does not meet WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN per lack of appearances in a fully professional league (in Spain, only Primera...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Amateur league. Fails WP:FOOTYN. Night of the Big Wind talk 21:58, 14 March 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »come across? Quantpole (talk) 22:56, 6 July 2009 (UTC) Keep applying WP:FOOTYN seems appropriate. The FA Futsal League operates regionally but does appear...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Never played a match in a fully professional league. Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG Vanadus (talk | contribs) 22:57, 18 August 2011 (UTC) But he...
Click to read more »football pyramid, therefore is not eligible for a national competition per WP:FOOTYN. No indication of any other achievements garnering sufficient significant...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom. As stated, "never made the grade" per WP:ATHLETE WP:FOOTYN etc--ClubOranjeT 06:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom. Does not...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Delete – Amateur club which fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. — Jkudlick tcs 05:15, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Delete - Amateur...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Delete I prodded this article some time ago as it fails the WP:FOOTYN criteria. I think the deprodding editor didn't realise that the Spartan...
Click to read more »showing team played in a national cup competition that would satisfy WP:FOOTYN. dashiellx (talk) 17:54, 21 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »nation so competition, passes WP:FOOTYN. Fenix down (talk) 15:13, 25 November 2017 (UTC) Keep per above passes WP:FOOTYN.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:48...
Click to read more »October 2020 (UTC) Delete - No evidence that this club meets WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. LTFC 95 (talk) 07:48, 2 October 2020 (UTC) Delete 11th tier teams are not...
Click to read more »user with no reason provided; the subject clearly fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN (no appearances in a fully professional team). Angelo (talk) 11:45, 27 March...
Click to read more »April 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:FOOTYN. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:11, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Keep - the criteria at WP:FOOTYN state the players must "Have played...
Click to read more »of a player meeting WP:GNG yet failing WP:FOOTYN, and yet some ignore process and only care about WP:FOOTYN. Nfitz (talk) 20:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »player passes WP:FOOTYN by playing for a professional club (Cambridge) at a national level (Conference National)". However, WP:FOOTYN is just an essay...
Click to read more »article for a club that meets the WP:FOOTYN standard of being eligible for a national cup (and I am aware that FOOTYN is an out-dated essay). Spiderone 11:52...
Click to read more »deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:21, 28 May 2017 (UTC) Delete - Fails to meet WP:FOOTYN#Club notability. Trout the IP who dePRODded without addressing the issues...
Click to read more »realised that the club competed in the 2015 Chinese FA Cup, so meets the WP:FOOTYN standard for clubs. Number 57 14:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC) @Number 57: Excellent...
Click to read more »Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup and is not a top-tier team, thus also fails WP:FOOTYN. This is the very definition of WP:TOOSOON. — Jkudlick tcs 23:17, 25 September...
Click to read more »North America1000 12:29, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Keep: Article does meet WP:FOOTYN. Found mentions in articles such as this and this which shows that this...
Click to read more »has not played in the national cup and is not in a WP:FPL, thus fails WP:FOOTYN. Club has not garnered significant coverage to meet requirements of WP:N...
Click to read more »well-run, it has yet to play at a high enough level for the purposes of WP:FOOTYN#Club notability. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 19:54, 4 April 2011 (UTC) Delete:...
Click to read more »that the team has played in national competitions, thus clearly meeting WP:FOOTYN. Why then does User:GeoffreyT2000 choose to ignore WP:FOOTY consensus and...
Click to read more »has not played in the national cup and is not in a WP:FPL, thus fails WP:FOOTYN. Club has not garnered significant coverage to meet requirements of WP:N...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems to fail critarias according to WP:FOOTYN, as Sweden have a cup system. There are no claims supporting notability...
Click to read more »Weak keep - correct me if I'm wrong but I believe consensus, as per WP:FOOTYN, is that we keep articles on clubs that compete in national cups [1], which...
Click to read more »how every single one of the 737 clubs has an article. That is because WP:FOOTYN states that "All teams that have played in the national cup (or the national...
Click to read more »future there are established notability guidelines for soccer teams at WP:FOOTYN. GiantSnowman 10:20, 3 October 2019 (UTC) Thank you GiantSnowman. I did...
Click to read more »January 2013 (UTC) Delete - has not played at a notable level, and fails WP:FOOTYN. Also fails WP:GNG, as the club hasn't received significant coverage in...
Click to read more »According to WP:FOOTYN, he may be notable if the article is factual. Roodog2k (talk) 19:47, 15 March 2013 (UTC) First of all, WP:FOOTYN is an essay and...
Click to read more »not eligible to play in the FA Cup, failing WP:FOOTYN. GiantSnowman 21:06, 19 July 2011 (UTC) The FOOTYN criteria is a nonsense, because it would mean...
Click to read more »Original concern was "Does not assert notability under WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN". The prod was then removed, with the explanation "certainly does assert...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG.No source. Yogwi21talk 13:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC) Delete non-notable...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 08:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC) Keep - meets WP:FOOTYN, we in WP:FOOTY generally keep players who are playing in country's top...
Click to read more »professional club: [1][2], making him pass WP:FOOTYN. – Kosm1fent 04:53, 28 May 2012 (UTC) Delete – for WP:FOOTYN to come into action, both teams have to be...
Click to read more »that have played in the top level and/or national cup competition, per WP:FOOTYN#Club notability. Vittoriosa have also appeared in the FA Trophy, Malta's...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:FOOTYN as the team has not played at level 10 or in the FA Vase or FA Cup. Del♉sion23...
Click to read more »never played a game comes nowhere near meeting topic specific guidelines WP:FOOTYN Dom from Paris (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD. Concern was Football club that does not meet WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. PROD was contested by an IP without providing a reason. Sir...
Click to read more »level. Never appeared in top flight or the national cup and thus fails WP:FOOTYN. Timbouctou (talk) 21:10, 13 September 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »here is WP:GNG, a guideline that reflects project-wide consensus, not WP:FOOTYN, a Wikiproject essay meant to provide a roadmap to project participants...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 01:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC) Keep - passes WP:FOOTYN as Ecuadorean league is fully professional. There are no less than 5 copies...
Click to read more »all fail WP:FOOTYN and I'll gladly AfD them all as soon as this one closes. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 00:11, 7 March 2012 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:FOOTYN; no evidence...
Click to read more »discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC) Keep - per WP:FOOTYN, consensus is that teams that have competed in a national competition are...
Click to read more »DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 09:04, 29 January 2012 (UTC) Incubate. He "technically" passes WP:FOOTYN, but if that one appearance against a minnow is his only claim of notability...
Click to read more »of notability. GiantSnowman 10:38, 10 April 2016 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:FOOTYN no indication the team has particiapted in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN is not met so unlikely to be more sources out there. According to the talk...
Click to read more »including winning the 1987 Canadian National Challenge Cup and 2000, meeting WP:FOOTYN. Also meets WP:GNG being the ranked as "most successful amateur soccer club...
Click to read more »on multiple occasions in the last century, including 2012 [1] meeting WP:FOOTYN. Nfitz (talk) 19:33, 6 September 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »brand new after a merger between two clubs and doesn't meet the old WP:FOOTYN guidelines for clubs yet, doesn't meet WP:NSPORTS or WP:GNG. NZFC(talk)(cont)...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Player does not pass WP:GN or WP:FOOTYN as he has not played in a professional league or represented Libya. Delusion23...
Click to read more »article. Pretty Green (talk) 10:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:FOOTYN. Playing for the U-17 national team does not make one notable for inclusion...
Click to read more »result was delete. The keep arguments display a misunderstanding of WP:FOOTYN. JohnCD (talk) 14:03, 27 April 2012 (UTC) Bideford 1st XI (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »possible BLP1E/NOT Memorial. Prodded for nn, prod removed based on WP:FOOTYN guideline. There is no way to fill this article out, because subject has...
Click to read more »verified. GiantSnowman 20:47, 21 September 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, has not participated in a national competition. Not seeing any indication...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Amateur club which meets neither WP:GNG or WP:FOOTYN. Onel5969 TT me 14:26, 5 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, has not participated in a national competition. No indication of wider...
Click to read more »national cup, which is generally deemed to make a club notable (see WP:FOOTYN). We have articles on all the other clubs playing in the second tier in...
Click to read more »deletion.Edinburgh Wanderer 18:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Keep - according to WP:FOOTYN, "All leagues that are a country's highest level are assumed notable". This...
Click to read more »★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 18:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC) Delete – per nom, fails WP:FOOTYN & WP:GNG. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 18:35, 23 April 2012 (UTC) Comment. To clarify:...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-professional club, does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:FOOTYN. Would redirect to league, but no article for the league exists. Was deprodded...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails notability as per WP:FOOTYN, has not played in a fully-professional league. Only reference does not...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:33, 28 May 2015 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG- Govindaharihari (talk)...
Click to read more »this player has never played at professional level, therefore failing WP:FOOTYN and WP:BIO EP 22:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC) This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »TWL) Footballer who played only a few games in a league which fails WP:FOOTYN in that it's not listed here, and also per precedence in this discussion...
Click to read more »football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:54, 18 June 2012 (UTC) Keep. WP:FOOTYN states that when considering the notability of amateur era footballers,...
Click to read more »Has not played a single game fails WP:GNG. Subject specific guideline WP:FOOTYN not met. Dom from Paris (talk) 08:49, 26 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Never played or managed at a fully-pro level, so fails WP:FOOTYN, no evidence of significant coverage to pass WP:GNG ChrisTheDude (talk)...
Click to read more »Bet teams are eligible to play in the Israel State Cup. According to WP:FOOTYN: "All leagues whose members are eligible for national cups are assumed notable...
Click to read more »division in the country and thus not the national level, none of them pass WP:FOOTYN. –TCN7JM 06:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC) Delete all - no evidence of notability...
Click to read more »not clearly demonstrated and doesn't pass WP:FOOTYN. Prior consensus at this level is mixed, but FOOTYN states that a club should play on a national level...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Keep per Nfitz has played in the 2020 Thai League Cup passes WP:FOOTYN.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC) Comment Wait I thought...
Click to read more »clubs. The relevant subject specific guideline is the similarly named WP:FOOTYN, for which I believe the club notability guidelines are still valid. They...
Click to read more »requirement two of WP:FOOTYN. Oli (talk) 12:02, 10 August 2008 (UTC) Comment, can you provide a reliable source for that? WP:FOOTYN is only a guideline...
Click to read more »participants that participation in the 2018 Piala Indonesia cup satisfies WP:FOOTYN. Mackensen (talk) 11:24, 4 August 2018 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »criteria at WP:FOOTYN. -- Alexf42 12:33, 9 September 2008 (UTC) Comment. Can I point out the essay project note template at the top of the WP:FOOTYN, where it...
Click to read more »Mr Stephen (talk) 10:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC) Delete - Passes neither Wp:FOOTYN nor Wp:GNG. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 18:58, 31...
Click to read more »but essentially the community is completely divided on things like WP:FOOTYN and a long-term solution would be to start an RfC to revise the notability...
Click to read more »Delete - fails WP:CLUB and WP:FOOTYN. Fenix down (talk) 17:42, 30 November 2015 (UTC) Snow Delete - fails WP:CLUB and WP:FOOTYN –Davey2010Talk 00:40, 3 December...
Click to read more »pro league. PROD was contested on the basis that the article may meet WP:FOOTYN which explicitly states that it no longer applies to players. Sir Sputnik...
Click to read more »Ivan-e-gharb F.C. is one of the teams. It makes it notable regards to WP:FOOTYN. ●Mehran Debate● 19:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC) As discussed at the last...
Click to read more »"remove prod - may be notable for other reasons that WP:ATHLETE - meets WP:FOOTYN and also may meet WP:BIO because of media coverage - http://news.google...
Click to read more »league fails WP:FOOTYN, please post articles to WP:AFD then after these articles AfD close, you go here to renominate. And note that: WP:FOOTYN is not a standard...
Click to read more »I don't know for sure. In any case, it's ineligible for G5 and meets WP:FOOTYN per the previous AfD, so speedy keep. Smartyllama (talk) 16:34, 7 December...
Click to read more »inline. Doesn't seem to satisfy WP:GNG, WP:ORG and—although it's an essay—WP:FOOTYN#Club notability. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 00:55, 16 September...
Click to read more »not. пﮟოьεԻ 57 21:27, 4 September 2008 (UTC) Comment What about Wikipedia:FOOTYN? I am a little uncertain about the status of this guideline, but on the...
Click to read more »has only ever played in minor amateur competitions, therefore fails WP:FOOTYN. Also fails WP:N due to lack of significant coverage. Jellyman (talk) 18:35...
Click to read more »13 April 2012 (UTC) Keep. Passes WP:FOOTYN. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC) Keep. Passes WP:FOOTYN per sources provided. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't appear to meet WP:FOOTYN. Uhooep (talk) 07:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »(UTC) I agree that it should be excluded per WP:FOOTYN, but WP:ATHLETE doesn't incorporate WP:FOOTYN yet. Also, the Copa do Brasil is a national fully-pro...
Click to read more »GiantSnowman 16:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC) Keep per Giantsnowman and passes WP:FOOTYN has played in a Thai national cups multiple times including the the 2018...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN for me, hasn't played a competitive football match at senior level, so doesn't...
Click to read more »per GS, team is playing in top level league in its country, so passes WP:FOOTYN. Concede there are potential GNG issues here though, but want to see the...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN#Club notability - never been in a WP:FPL. Contested PROD. Cabayi (talk)...
Click to read more »specifically does not cover teams, suggesting WP:GNG is their guideline. WP:FOOTYN is a project essay on the issue - it merely suggests non-national teams...
Click to read more » The result was speedy keep. Meets generally accepted consensus of WP:FOOTYN, nominator has withdrawn nomination. Fenix down (talk) 09:06, 1 December...
Click to read more »That depends on if SC Cham is fully pro as well. If it is, he passes WP:FOOTYN, and should be kept. A quick look at the clubs article suggests that it...
Click to read more »only notability guideline I'm aware of that deals with cup fixtures is WP:FOOTYN, which specifically requires both team played for and against to be fully...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails the criteria at WP:FOOTYN as he has never played a professional game. No references or sources are...
Click to read more »22:45, 16 November 2010 (UTC) Keep all except Nuhodžić According to WP:FOOTYN players are demed notable if: "They have played for a fully professional...
Click to read more »24 April 2022 (UTC) Comment - this club would be the biggest pass of WP:FOOTYN I've ever seen at AFD. I'm surprised we are here, and I'm not sure what's...
Click to read more »of notability. GiantSnowman 14:04, 2 March 2012 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:03, 11 March 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:05, 3 May 2012 (UTC) Delete - no evidence of notability...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) My apologies for that. Further to any consideration is that WP:FOOTYN states that All leagues that are a country's highest level are assumed notable...
Click to read more »★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:55, 19 April 2012 (UTC) Delete - no evidence of...
Click to read more »that has never played at fully professional level therefore failing WP:FOOTYN and WP:ATHLETE. If the player ever plays at the required level a suitably...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fail WP:FOOTYN Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:35, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »Coupe de France (the French National cup competion) - which would meet WP:FOOTYN. Of course - this needs sourcing, but if true should be able to be confirmed...
Click to read more »of notability. GiantSnowman 22:51, 2 March 2012 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:03, 11 March 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »of notability. GiantSnowman 18:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:12, 11 March 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »requirement for player notability. The current project guideline is at WP:FOOTYN (not an official standard it has to be noted, though). Frankly, whether...
Click to read more »WP:CRYSTAL applies here. пﮟოьεԻ 57 17:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC) *Keep Passes WP:FOOTYN, fails WP:BIO#Athletes, just about passes WP:BIO#Basic criteria, so in this...
Click to read more »Lifetalk 16:07, 26 August 2011 (UTC) Delete article does not pass WP:GNG or WP:FOOTYN Delusion23 (talk) 13:18, 1 September 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »[1] пﮟოьεԻ 57 17:38, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. --Angelo (talk) 15:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Delete as mentioned above...
Click to read more »professional league and has only been called up to the national futsal team. WP:FOOTYN seems to indicate that a player must have played a full international for...
Click to read more »discussions. -- OSborn arfcontribs. 18:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:FOOTYN.--Sodabottle (talk) 14:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »notability. GiantSnowman 08:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »+ the claim that this team plays in Serie D, which is enough to meet WP:FOOTYN. And to answer DGG - yes, amateur teams are notable. GiantSnowman 15:32...
Click to read more »reference is only a trivial mention). Footballer who isn't shown to meet WP:FOOTYN. Cloudz679 06:03, 3 February 2012 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »deletions. Zanoni (talk) 20:32, 22 June 2011 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. GiantSnowman 20:43, 22 June 2011 (UTC) Delete. Non notable club. Never...
Click to read more »per below. GiantSnowman 14:09, 13 September 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, has not participated in a national competition. Not seeing any indication...
Click to read more »Mayumashu (talk) 23:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. Nfitz (talk) 23:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Do not meet WP:ATHLETE or WP:FOOTYN. Only 6 results in Google Caiaffa (talk) 06:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »proof that the player has played at a notable level .. player fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG TonyStarks (talk) 18:14, 2 December 2011 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »significant coverage. BigDom 20:19, 4 April 2011 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 23:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »according to current consensus this individual simply does not fulfill WP:FOOTYN. Although this notability criteria is not a guideline, there has been significant...
Click to read more »playing at the (notional) 13th rung of the English football pyramid. WP:FOOTYN says teams up to level 10 generally meet GNG. There is little independant...
Click to read more »above. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 16:23, 4 April 2011 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 23:12, 7 April 2011 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »national team. Simione001 (talk) 13:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC) According to WP:FOOTYN, "players are deemed notable if they (...) Have played FIFA recognised senior...
Click to read more »Footballer who has never played in any fully professiona leagues. Fails FOOTYN Lack of reliable sources to establish NFOOTY Kichu🐘 Need any help? 08:44...
Click to read more »notability. GiantSnowman 13:25, 1 January 2018 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »both teams were fully pro, as mentioned at WP:FOOTYN. Bettia (rawr!) 11:21, 20 October 2008 (UTC) WP:FOOTYN is a personal essay, not adopted as either guideline...
Click to read more »A-team competition as the true national cup, this league therefore fails WP:FOOTYN as it is not a league from which clubs can enter the national cup, they...
Click to read more »Delete has never played football at professional level, therefore fails WP:FOOTYN EP 16:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. -- Alexf42 17:04, 2 September...
Click to read more »of notability. GiantSnowman 21:11, 11 June 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »media coverage which never played for the national cup. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Kosm1fent Won't you talk to me? 09:17, 8 September 2011 (UTC) Delete -...
Click to read more »club that hasn't participated at a national level. Fails to satisfy WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG, e.g. reliable sources, significant coverage, etc. Mephtalk 16:02...
Click to read more »ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:FOOTYN. Junior football teams are non-notable unless they meet wider criteria of...
Click to read more »athlete that has never played at the professional level and thus fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG TonyStarks (talk) 10:44, 18 November 2011 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »national Cup (see Soccerway) - meets general team notability guidance at WP:FOOTYN. GiantSnowman 09:50, 22 August 2020 (UTC) Keep per above. REDMAN 2019 (talk)...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Delete - Does not assert notability under WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. RM-Taylor (talk) 13:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »GiantSnowman 19:12, 10 January 2017 (UTC) Delete - no indication of satisfying WP:FOOTYN, let alone GNG. Fenix down (talk) 10:10, 11 January 2017 (UTC) Delete per...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of appearing for the first team. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 06:38, 26 August 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete - pet...
Click to read more »amateur team, no indication of team has participated at a level to fulfil WP:FOOTYN let alone GNG. Fenix down (talk) 13:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »whether Žalgiris Vilnius is fully professional. And I believe it is. WP:FOOTYN requires team to be professional, not league. Nfitz (talk) 03:57, 12 January...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable per WP:FOOTYN. Liga V, a regional level competition in Romania is not eligible for national...
Click to read more »TWL) No appearances in a fully professional league and therefore fails WP:FOOTYN Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 13:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC) Keigo Numata appearances...
Click to read more »GiantSnowman 15:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable team. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:43, 3 May 2012 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fail WP:FOOTYN Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:51, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »00:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN (no professional games) --Angelo (talk) 07:46, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »that does not meet the notability requirements set out in WP:ORG or WP:FOOTYN. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 17:48, 11 June 2011 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »(talk) 06:32, 18 September 2018 (UTC) Delete as per nom. Does not meet WP:FOOTYN. Dom from Paris (talk) 06:36, 18 September 2018 (UTC) Keep This team have...
Click to read more »enough. WP:ATHLETE was vague on the subject, but I see now that he passes WP:FOOTYN, so I hereby withdraw the AFD. --Badmotorfinger (talk) 22:15, 16 September...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Delete - Does not assert notability under WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. RM-Taylor (talk) 13:10, 25 July 2009 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »of notability. GiantSnowman 18:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »that played in third- and fourth-tier leagues in Cyprus. According to WP:FOOTYN football clubs can be presumed notable if they play in a league eligible...
Click to read more »1 May 2012 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable local teams. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:40, 3 May 2012 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Delete - Does not assert notability under WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. RM-Taylor (talk) 13:14, 25 July 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »is no indication the club has received significant coverage, or meets WP:FOOTYN. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC) Delete - no evidence of...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fail WP:FOOTYN Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:43, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »with the Barcelona youth system; the subject fails both WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN (no professional appearances). Angelo (talk) 08:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Doesn't appear to have played in the KNVB Cup so fails WP:FOOTYN and no significant coverage means it also fails WP:GNG. T 88 R (talk) 22:41...
Click to read more »highest level of German football. Especially given the stipulations of WP:FOOTYN, I would say all three of these people are notable. Just because it was...
Click to read more »article author that was endorsed by a 2nd editor. PROD Reason was "Per WP:FOOTYN team playing in league that does not appear to be eligible for National...
Click to read more »level aren't. Has not played in the national cup and therefore fails WP:FOOTYN. Valenciano (talk) 19:27, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fail WP:FOOTYN Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:40, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »— Frankie (talk) 19:09, 12 April 2012 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:25, 12 April 2012 (UTC) Delete. Not notable. They...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 16:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »notability. GiantSnowman 11:18, 29 October 2016 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Footballer who played only 10 games in a league which fails WP:FOOTYN in that it's not listed here, and also per precedence in this discussion...
Click to read more »Phil Bridger (talk) 21:30, 17 April 2012 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:26, 17 April 2012 (UTC) Keep. In reply to the nomination...
Click to read more »deleted for failing WP:GNG and not meeting the rule of thumb outlined at WP:FOOTYN, in fact it's 6 tiers lower than where it would need to be to be presumed...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Player is non-notable per WP:FOOTYN, having never played in a professional league and have not been contracted...
Click to read more »related deletions. пﮟოьεԻ 57 13:25, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Delete: Also fails WP:FOOTYN. -- Alexf42 14:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 16:10...
Click to read more »of notability. GiantSnowman 21:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »of notability. GiantSnowman 21:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »and yet another PROD contested by an IP user. Fails per WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. I am also nominating the following players for the same reasons described...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) An amateur club that fails WP:FOOTYN, and the references are just only for the team members, no any kind of source...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Declined Prod by author. Prod reason was "Per WP:FOOTYN non notable team in sub-national league. Unreferenced article." Prod Decline...
Click to read more »He has made no appearances in a fully professional league, so fails WP:FOOTYN. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 20:00, 27 January 2012 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »contested by a IP user with no summary whatsoever. Fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. Angelo (talk) 08:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC) This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) Non-notable soccer club, fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN JMHamo (talk) 18:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 14:44, 8 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:47, 25 January 2019 (UTC) Comment: WP:FOOTYN—which is a project advice essay and not a Wikipedia guideline—notwithstanding...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Amateur team which does not meet either WP:FOOTYN or WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 13:02, 3 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »has not played in the national cup and is not in a WP:FPL, thus fails WP:FOOTYN. Club has not garnered significant coverage to meet requirements of WP:N...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Delete - Does not assert notability under WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. RM-Taylor (talk) 13:09, 25 July 2009 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 14:43, 8 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 13 February 2015 (UTC) Delete - per WP:FOOTYN has never played in a national competition. No other achievements noted...
Click to read more »and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 21:46, 23 May 2020 (UTC) Delete – fails WP:FOOTYN. Drat8sub (talk) 20:19, 24 May 2020 (UTC) Delete and SALT - still not notable...
Click to read more »12:05, 3 May 2012 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable local teams. Fail WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:33, 3 May 2012 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »both of these are below the cut-off point for notability established at WP:FOOTYN. They get a bit of coverage in the Falmouth Packet and other local papers...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Footballer who played only 3 games in a league which fails WP:FOOTYN in that it's not listed here, and also per precedence in this discussion...
Click to read more »Delete per nom Spiderone 17:51, 11 September 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, has not participated in a national competition. Not seeing any indication...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Delete - The general rule of thumb for football teams (per Wp:FOOTYN) is that they play in at least their country's national cup. I can't find...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Footballer who played only 6 games in a league which fails WP:FOOTYN in that it's not listed here, and also per precedence in this discussion...
Click to read more »played in a fully professional league or at full international level (WP:FOOTYN). Jmorrison230582 (talk) 16:29, 11 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »players does not exist. Geschichte (talk) 18:10, 16 July 2025 (UTC) WP:FOOTYN is no longer valid. It has been superseded by WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG and there...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN. Has not played a match in a fully professional league yet. Vanadus (talk...
Click to read more »professional club, or Olympic experience, thus failing all points of WP:FOOTYN GauchoDude (talk) 06:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC) I am also nominating the following...
Click to read more »professional league and has not played in the national cup so fails WP:FOOTYN and clearly fails WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:10, 4 May 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN. Has not played a match in a fully professional league yet. Vanadus (talk...
Click to read more »therefore fails WP:N and WP:ATHLETE, as well as the notability guidelines at WP:FOOTYN JonBroxton (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »football match, which means that he clearly fails both WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 19:48, 29 June 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »and would have even failed under the old guidelines WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:FOOTYN. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:48, 8 September 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »professional match, and therefore fails the guidelines of WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. A google search reveals some results, but no more than you would expect...
Click to read more »notability under WP:GNG. Ifnord (talk) 01:49, 26 June 2018 (UTC) Delete - per WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. WP:NSPORT doesn't seem to have anything on football leagues...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fail WP:FOOTYN Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:46, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) No references; plays in a semi-professional league, fails WP:FOOTYN Vanadus (talk | contribs) 21:37, 8 August 2011 (UTC) Delete There are a...
Click to read more »huh? what I'm been doing 19:54, 29 October 2016 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »TWL) Unreferenced article about a non-notable football club... fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:V... Also, possibly a hoax, as information is regularly changed by...
Click to read more »08:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC) Keep. As a player of Real Madrid easily passes WP:FOOTYN. The article needs to be improved. I found a couple of online sources, I...
Click to read more »eligible for national cups are assumed notable" according to Wikipedia:FOOTYN, thus the article should satisfy notability. Referencing needs to be added...
Click to read more »of notability. GiantSnowman 16:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »The club played in the 2016 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup and clearly meets WP:FOOTYN for that reason. (non-admin closure) — Jkudlick • t • c • s 05:12, 24 September...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Delete – per above. Fails WP:FOOTYN. Entertaining article, but no indication of wider GNG filfillment. Fenix...
Click to read more »compete at a high enough sporting level to meet standard requirements at WP:FOOTYN. GiantSnowman 21:20, 21 June 2011 (UTC) Yeah, I'm just a little worried...
Click to read more »Fails GNG .–Davey2010Talk 21:58, 20 July 2015 (UTC) Delete -- fails WP:FOOTYN, WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. No assertion nor evidence of notability. — CactusWriter...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Footballer who has not played at a professional level, fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. Tassedethe (talk) 00:05, 14 April 2012 (UTC) Delete per nom...
Click to read more »Pack Lambert (talk) 19:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC) Delete, fails both SIGCOV and FOOTYN. Drat8sub (talk) 00:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »find any indication that they have played in a national competition per WP:FOOTYN. Fenix down (talk) 15:23, 8 September 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »of notability. GiantSnowman 08:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the team has competed in a national competition. No indication...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Delete - Does not assert notability under WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. RM-Taylor (talk) 13:09, 25 July 2009 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete a fourteen-year old little boy can hardly meet WP:ATHLETE, WP:FOOTYN, WP:N and so on... I wish him to see his name back here in the next five...
Click to read more »28 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. Hasn't played professionally. Doesn't meet WP:FOOTYN. And let's face it ... he wasn't good enough to start on the worst team...
Click to read more »Sputnik (talk) 18:51, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:12, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:GNG...
Click to read more »football match, which means that he clearly fails both WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 19:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Individual fails WP:FOOTYN as has not played in or managed in a fully professional league. Subject...
Click to read more »notability. GiantSnowman 19:12, 10 January 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Keep - per WP:FOOTYN - club has played in a national competition. Playing in the second tier...
Click to read more »discussions. —Cliff smith talk 16:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:FOOTYN. No decent ghits to speak of. -- Alexf42 12:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This player fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Malaysian Premier League is not top-tier. Cloudz679 14:22, 2 February 2012...
Click to read more »leagues in his home country (Norway)" - shows that he doesn't meet the Wp:FOOTYN guidelines. The only fully pro Norwegian league is the Tippeligaen, and...
Click to read more »Football player in a youth competition who does not meet WP:ATHLETE or WP:FOOTYN Mattinbgn\talk 21:33, 13 December 2008 (UTC) Delete Monterosso hasen't made...
Click to read more »Article fails to meet the notability standards at WP:N, WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN JonBroxton (talk) 21:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN. Has not played a match in a fully professional league yet. Vanadus (talk...
Click to read more »footballer who is not the subject of extensive coverage and does not meet WP:FOOTYN criteria. Ytoyoda (talk) 22:34, 26 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »which is the generally agreed upon baseline for club notability per WP:FOOTYN. Fenix down (talk) 07:40, 30 June 2015 (UTC) Delete - no evidence of notability...
Click to read more »★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 06:35, 19 December 2012 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:29, 19 December 2012 (UTC) Delete -...
Click to read more »appearances (purportedly) for the US nation women's team and so passes WP:FOOTYN, but I can't find any sources to actually verify any of the content, and...
Click to read more »showing team played in a national cup competition that would satisfy WP:FOOTYN. dashiellx (talk) 21:13, 22 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »FIFA sanctioned friendly against South Africa in May 2010, so he passes WP:FOOTYN as a Thai international player. I'll update the article now. Argyle 4 Lifetalk...
Click to read more »deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC) Delete - per WP:FOOTYN has never played in a national competition. No other achievements noted...
Click to read more »A-team competition as the true national cup, this league therefore fails WP:FOOTYN as it is not a league from which clubs can enter the national cup, they...
Click to read more »- hasn't played at a high enough level to be considered notable, per WP:FOOTYN. GiantSnowman 17:09, 11 June 2011 (UTC) Delete - non-notable social/kickabout...
Click to read more »Delete - Not covered by a subject specific guideline, nor by the essay WP:FOOTYN as this does not refer to futsal. No indication the club has received significant...
Click to read more »therefore fails notability guidelines for football teams established at WP:FOOTYN. GiantSnowman 21:26, 4 June 2010 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable football team...
Click to read more »amateur team, no indication of team has participated at a level to fulfil WP:FOOTYN let alone GNG. The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate...
Click to read more »- does not seem to have ever played professional football, so fails WP:FOOTYN, no significant source coverage so fails WP:GNG -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:24...
Click to read more »importantly WP:GNG. BigDom (talk) 15:25, 17 September 2012 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG as he has not played in a fully-professional game nor has gained...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN. Has not played a match yet. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 23:46, 10 August...
Click to read more »of notability. GiantSnowman 19:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »moment the underlying principle that we follow is set down in the essay WP:FOOTYN which states All teams that have played in the national cup (or the national...
Click to read more »system, although was not officially part of the system, does not meet WP:FOOTYN criteria for presumed notability. Its notability has to be based purely...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN: Club which has not played at national level and not shown to meet broader...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) About a now retired soccer player who easily fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG as they have not played in a fully pro league (the CSL is not...
Click to read more »article, however, needs updating and improving. Also please note that WP:FOOTYN is merely an essay, not policy. GiantSnowman 11:44, 23 May 2012 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »professional game. Quentin X (talk) 14:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:FOOTYN -- Alexf42 17:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »football club has never played in a national-level league or cup. It fails WP:FOOTYN. It is not a well-known club in Peru either. Almost no sources on article...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Never played in a professional league, so fails WP:FOOTYN, no significant media coverage so fails WP:GNG ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:32...
Click to read more »hasn't competed at a high enough level to be considered notable, per WP:FOOTYN. GiantSnowman 16:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable team. Argyle...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN as the Victorian Premier League is not recognized as fully professional...
Click to read more »professional match and therefore fails the guidelines of WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. No sources provided to suggest he meets the more general standards of WP:N...
Click to read more »who is yet to have made a fully professional appearance, thus failing WP:FOOTYN. Jared Preston (talk) 20:07, 8 March 2011 (UTC) Note: The footballer has...
Click to read more »WP:GNG. PROD was challenged as he has played international football, but WP:FOOTYN allows only senior international competition and this man has only played...
Click to read more »football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC) Delete - WP:FOOTYN failure, has not played in a national cup nor at a national level of the...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN... O'Reilly has never played a senior game for Fulham JMHamo (talk) 14:56...
Click to read more »without explanation even though the player fails both WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN having never played professional football at any level King of the North...
Click to read more »GiantSnowman 15:36, 1 May 2012 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable team. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC) Delete. can not find evidence...
Click to read more »Hasn't played any games in a fully professional league, and so fails WP:FOOTYN. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 00:55, 6 July 2012 (UTC) Keep - He has played...
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) Competing in a cup doesn't provide automatic notability, but WP:FOOTYN implies teams which partake in the later rounds of the cup are generally...
Click to read more »to speedy delete Spiderone 11:55, 28 August 2017 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:FOOTYN, has not played in a national competition. No indication of wider GNG. Fenix...
Click to read more »notable -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN as lack of a game between two fully professional clubs in league fixture...
Click to read more »represented his country internationally in any competition and so fails WP:FOOTYN Fenix down (talk) 10:11, 16 October 2012 (UTC) Delete - per nom. He has...
Click to read more »discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:33, 15 August 2021 (UTC) Keep. Meets WP:FOOTYN #1 and #2. gidonb (talk) 22:15, 15 August 2021 (UTC) Speedy Keep In addition...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The team fails WP:FOOTYN as they didn't play in the national cup for Cyprus with their two appearances...
Click to read more »in Canada. Clearly fails WP:GNG and the football-specific guidelines (WP:FOOTYN). This topic does not receive routine coverage and details can not be verified...
Click to read more »of notability. GiantSnowman 17:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »semi-professional. This means he fails the guidelines of WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN, and there are no sources provided to suggest he passes WP:N. Jmorrison230582...
Click to read more »for the US national cup, therefore meeting notability guidelines at WP:FOOTYN. GiantSnowman 21:34, 4 June 2010 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...
Click to read more »played third tier football in a non-nationwide division. Seems to fail WP:FOOTYN. Fenix down (talk) 10:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC) Delete: No evidence of notability...
Click to read more »notability. GiantSnowman 08:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, has not participated in a national competition. Not seeing any indication...
Click to read more »This league is at least 3 tiers below the rule-of-thumb provided by WP:FOOTYN and so WP:GNG needs to be met to qualify for an article. Google searches...
Click to read more »this is simply a non-notable youth club from Wales. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Onel5969 TT me 12:14, 14 May 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »mischaracterisation of WP:GNG on the part of the nominator. Did they mean WP:FOOTYN? I don't read Thai, but there's a chance Ayodhya City FC and Pad Siam FC...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was speedy keep. Clearly notable per WP:FOOTYN, especially the achievements of the women's team. Fenix down (talk) 10:18...
Click to read more »that this club has participated in the national cup, therefore failing WP:FOOTYN; also fails WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 12:32, 22 June 2011 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Delete - Does not assert notability under WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN. RM-Taylor (talk) 13:08, 25 July 2009 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »GiantSnowman 10:26, 26 August 2008 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN --Angelo (talk) 12:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. GauchoDude (talk)...
Click to read more »is notable because it is the highest soccer league in Canada, passing WP:FOOTYN. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 19:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »fully professional league and therefore does not meet WP:ATHLETE or WP:FOOTYN Mattinbgn\talk 23:10, 15 December 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »ITalk to my owner:Online 23:00, 12 February 2015 (UTC) Delete - per WP:FOOTYN has never played in a national competition. No other achievements noted...
Click to read more »clubs. – ukexpat (talk) 01:16, 27 November 2009 (UTC) Comment - See Wp:FOOTYN. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 19:49, 27 November...
Click to read more »of notability. GiantSnowman 10:12, 15 March 2018 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC) Keep: Looks to pass WP:FOOTYN, but article could definitely use some work. WP:FPL lists the top Finnish...
Click to read more »Delete- Non-notable team. Never played in a national competition per WP:FOOTYN. Fenix down (talk) 15:49, 29 January 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) PROD removal with no reasoning. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:FOOTYN. Cloudz679 20:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:48, 25 April 2011 (UTC) Delete fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG due to a lack of significant media coverage. --Jimbo[online]...
Click to read more »Delete per nom Spiderone 17:51, 11 September 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, has not participated in a national competition. Not seeing any indication...
Click to read more »A-team competition as the true national cup, this league therefore fails WP:FOOTYN as it is not a league from which clubs can enter the national cup, they...
Click to read more »Wisdom89 (T / C) 14:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC) Delete - As of right now, per WP:FOOTYN. The reason? Plays for a professional team..but hasn't made any appearances...
Click to read more »tier in the national level - which more than meets the requirements of WP:FOOTYN. We previously reached consensus at WP:FOOTY (archived in WT:WikiProject...
Click to read more »Gpc62 (talk) 06:26, 24 November 2017 (UTC) Keep per Gpc62 and passes WP:FOOTYN.Clubs who have played in the national cup competition and / or national...
Click to read more »of notability. GiantSnowman 07:09, 20 July 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep per WikiDan61. Plays in the Burundi Premier League and passes WP:FOOTYN.All teams that have played in the national cup (or the national level of...
Click to read more »top league in Lithuania may not be fully professional, player meets WP:FOOTYN as Žalgiris Vilnius is fully professional. Nfitz (talk) 03:07, 12 January...
Click to read more »youth division of a club. There is nothing to indicate this club meets WP:FOOTYN, and of the two sources listed, one is the club's own website. There is...
Click to read more »on the roster of a MLS team, but hasn't made an appearance yet. Also, WP:FOOTYN is only an essay and is not a formal guideline on notability. Mattythewhite...
Click to read more »professional league and has never represented his country and so fails WP:FOOTYN. Fenix down (talk) 10:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC) Delete - per nom. He has...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This does not meet WP:FOOTYN criteria for presumed notability as this is a sub-county feeder league and...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) Delete - A poor quality article of a club that clearly fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. League Octopus (League Octopus 10:44, 17 August 2012 (UTC))...
Click to read more »September 2011 (UTC) Delete. Level 4 of American football is not notable per WP:FOOTYN. The above comments reek of WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. Kosm1fent Won't you talk...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:FOOTYN guidelines as he has not yet made a professional appearance. Jameboy (talk)...
Click to read more »has ever taken part in the national stage of any competition, so fails WP:FOOTYN. No indication of any other achievements garnering significant reliable...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Then how can you delete this User:North8000? The standard in WP:FOOTYN is that a team is notable if it plays in national cups - and teams in this...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Amateur league footballer who fails notability as per WP:FOOTYN and GNG. Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's...
Click to read more »ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:57, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Delete - clearly fails both WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:57, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Delete....
Click to read more »deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:34, 31 August 2017 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, has not participated in a national competition. No indication of wider...
Click to read more »fail WP:SPORT as this is not a guideline but a wikiproject. Also passes WP:FOOTYN consensus. Article needs expanding and referencing, not deleting. The fact...
Click to read more »Another league that is well below the level for presumed notability as per WP:FOOTYN. Absolutely nothing coming up in Google Books, Google Images or Google News...
Click to read more »TWL) The team hasn't played in the Thai FA Cup which is a big part of WP:FOOTYN. HawkAussie (talk) 01:50, 14 June 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »case to Guildford and Woking Alliance League in that it does not meet WP:FOOTYN, the WikiProject guideline, and WP:GNG, the main guideline. Google News...
Click to read more »2018 (UTC) Keep. Having played in the national cup, clearly satisfies WP:FOOTYN. gidonb (talk) 00:43, 30 July 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NFOOTY as has played...
Click to read more »can see WP:STUB. Hhkohh (talk) 22:43, 22 May 2018 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:FOOTYN as per this has played in the CAF Confederation Cup.Pharaoh of the Wizards...
Click to read more »TWL) No appearances in a fully professional league yet and thus fails WP:FOOTYN Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 03:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »— Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 17:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:FOOTYN, WP:NORG, and WP:GNG. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 17:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Gpc62 (talk) 06:23, 24 November 2017 (UTC) Keep per Gpc62 and passes WP:FOOTYN.Clubs who have played in the national cup competition and / or national...
Click to read more »(talk ♦ stalk) 22:08, 28 June 2008 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:ATHLETE as well as WP:FOOTYN. He is not notable. GauchoDude (talk) 18:32, 29 June 2008 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »competition. --Jimbo[online] 12:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Delete: Also fails WP:FOOTYN. -- Alexf42 14:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Delete: concur with everyone else...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) Contested prod. Player fails WP:BIO#Athletes and WP:FOOTYN as he has never played in a fully professional league. пﮟოьεԻ 57 16:18,...
Click to read more »cornixtalk 19:46, 4 September 2008 (UTC) Delete. Does not seem to meet WP:FOOTYN requirements. -- Alexf42 19:35, 4 September 2008 (UTC) Delete article confers...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Footballer who fails WP:FOOTYN and GNG BlameRuiner (talk) 08:56, 18 October 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:FOOTYN. a lower division amateur side. LibStar (talk) 00:47, 21 November 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wizards (talk) 23:58, 23 July 2018 (UTC) Keep - as per Pharaoh, passes WP:FOOTYN with his four appearances for Muangthong. 21.colinthompson (talk) 02:33...
Click to read more »this bundle nom in 2008: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.D. Moma. Per WP:FOOTYN, clubs must meet GNG (having played in a country's top league is a suggested...
Click to read more »has ever taken part in the national stage of any competition, so fails WP:FOOTYN. No indication of any other achievements garnering significant reliable...
Click to read more »passes Wp:ATHLETE, since playing for a university team (that doesn't pass Wp:FOOTYN) or in an Under-17 competition doesn't grant notability. DitzyNizzy (aka...
Click to read more »23:18, 25 June 2010 (UTC) Delete - per nom. This club clearly fails WP:FOOTYN and other relevant notability guidelines. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:01, 26 June...
Click to read more »Željezničar is considered a fully-professional team, then he passes WP:FOOTYN. But since the Bosnian league is not fully-professional, i am not sure if...
Click to read more »is on their books! Spiderone 18:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN has never played in a national competition, nor is eligible for one. Looking...
Click to read more »following reasons. 1. The criteria for notoriety in football are confusing. WP:FOOTYN seems to be the only attempt to create one and the club passes that as being...
Click to read more »league (see Football in Thailand and Thailand FA Cup) so according to WP:FOOTYN as a club it's notable even if semi-professional -- Blue Square Thing (talk)...
Click to read more »close. There is no subject specific guideline around club notability. WP:FOOTYN which states clubs are notable if they play in a national competition (and...
Click to read more »(talk) 08:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC) Delete - fails both WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:21, 15 December 2011 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:GNG...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:FOOTYN as well as WP:GNG. NikolaiHo☎️ 00:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable club which doesn't meet the criteria of WP:FOOTYN. PROD was contested because this article was kept at a previous AfD, but...
Click to read more »7 November 2009 (UTC) Delete - Can't find any evidence of it passing Wp:FOOTYN. (And how can having a Wikipedia page cause you to progress in football...
Click to read more »Valetta, which is not a team from a fully pro league, and consensus per WP:FOOTYN is that footballers need to play in a match between two teams from fully...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:47, 2 December 2021 (UTC) Redirect to NISA Nation. Based on WP:FOOTYN#Club notability and present sources I think a redirect makes the most sense...
Click to read more »Snotbot t • c » 19:23, 2 July 2013 (UTC) Delete - still fails both WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:10, 2 July 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »football team. Haven't played in the national cup competition and so fail WP:FOOTYN, otherwise fails WP:GNG. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 19:00, 29 June 2012...
Click to read more »either. пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:27, 14 October 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN, and lack of appearances with Guatemala national team. --Angelo (talk) 10:40...
Click to read more »18 May 2012 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable local team. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:28, 18 May 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »sources to verify). Jogurney (talk) 14:34, 27 July 2018 (UTC) Keep passes WP:FOOTYN has played in the Coupe de France All teams that have played in the national...
Click to read more »No claim or evidence of notability, nor of meeting the standards of WP:FOOTYN. Onel5969 TT me 16:59, 28 December 2018 (UTC) Keep: Western F.C. (Thailand)...
Click to read more »notable by default. –HTD 09:18, 15 December 2013 (UTC) Keep - per above. WP:FOOTYN is clear on this as generally accepted consensus. Fenix down (talk) 13:42...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Delete Plays in the third tier of Romanian football. Fails WP:FOOTYN. -Drdisque (talk) 21:39, 29 November 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »deletions. Fenix down (talk) 08:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, has not played in a national competition, no indication of any other achievements...
Click to read more »indication that the club has played in a national competition, so fails WP:FOOTYN. Keep arguments here, particularly from @OAlexander: semm very much along...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. The club has not played in any of the national level football...
Click to read more »09:33, 2 May 2012 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable league. Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:39, 3 May 2012 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »--Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Delete fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN in that has not played yet in anything notable, recreate if and when--ClubOranjeT...
Click to read more »Spanish football which isn't a national division. The club also fails WP:FOOTYN as they haven't competed in the Copa del Rey which is the national cup competition...
Click to read more »WP:FOOTYN. Mehdighayedi (talk) 10:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC) — Mehdighayedi (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. FOOTYN does...
Click to read more »