conducted entirely through edit summaries is inadequate. Shortcuts WP:FOCWP:FOC WP:NOTCONDUCTWP:NOTCONDUCT Focus on article content during discussions, not...

flexlinkspro.com/g.ashx?foid=1.43935.4611686018427577212&trid=1334824.203276&foc=16&fot=9999&fos=5 (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2023-09-16 12:19:15 (UTC): User 49...

flexlinkspro.com/g.ashx?foid=1.43935.4611686018427577212&trid=1334824.203276&foc=16&fot=9999&fos=5 (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2023-09-16 12:19:15 (UTC): User 49...

(infobox), and "29 March 2016" (table) I wonder if the correlation between FOC-in-C and HAG could be clarified in the note. For instance, which is higher...

fattie.freehostia.com/KnotPilot/FOC/index.html#Lamlash. * Links added in this diff: fattie.freehostia.com/KnotPilot/FOC/index.html#Lamlash (6, 14, 6, 1)...

flexlinkspro.com/g.ashx?foid=1.43935.4611686018427577212&trid=1334824.203276&foc=16&fot=9999&fos=5 (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2023-09-16 12:19:15 (UTC): User 49...

high, is listed as the tallest building before 1988, whereas 'Foişorul de Foc', which is lower at 42 m, is listed as the tallest beginning since 1890....

of FOC and Choice get stripped out/pared down and placed in the FOC (economics) article leaving brief synopses and "See main" hatnotes in both FOC & Choice...

org/foc_winners.html (R/Xmeta/L) 2009-06-04 17:18:06 (UTC): w:ja:User:Moke (t - c; 226) to w:ja:フラナリー・オコナー (diff  !top) - Link: www.ugapress.org/foc.html...

pictures/History/American Civil War Creator Alexander Hay Ritchie after F.O.C. Darley; restored by Adam Cuerden Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has...

avoid disputes by focusing on article content rather than editor conduct WP:FOC. Recent arbitration committee findings state that The committee also encouraged...

Photographer..... Web Editor..... P.S. I’m happy for you to use the pic FOC [free of charge] under your ‘fair use’ definition but I retain the Copyright...

overlaps with domain: 'danyrolux'-'danyrolux.blogspot.com' = 45% (100/45)) - ro:Focşani - diff (undo) - COIBot UserReport - ro:Special:Contributions/Danyrolux...

editors, please refrain from commenting on your fellow editor's actions per WP:FOC— fcsuper (How's That?, That's How!) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) — 06:12...

violates WP:NPA and WP:FOC. We use this template for informing people of replies to their comments, not for attacking them, and FOC reads "Focus on article...

and suggesting as much is clearly not in the spirit of either WP:CIV or WP:FOC. There is a reference to the artist being listed as PeekYou's "most influential...

com/reports/SSTL_OHB_System_consortium_to_build_a_further_eight_Galileo_FOC_satellites_999.html (R/Xmeta/L) 2012-02-03 16:26:13 (UTC): User Vedant t •...

focused on the article, @Zxcvbnm, rather than the conduct of other editors, WP:FOC applies. The articles provided by @DigitalIceAge are fine. If a WP:HEYMAN...

121 (talk) 20:14, 1 July 2013 (UTC) With all due respect, please follow WP:FOC Sources that are not reliable shouldn't be used as references. Nor should...

and FOC? In other articles I have sometimes highlighted those by underlining instead of bolding the text. Let me try: àxwé yé Kòfí tù   (house FOC Kofi...

understand it, favored (or feared) critics could come and go freely and f.o.c. during the performance so they could write up several shows in an evening...

to 1) figure out the precise relationship between FOC and the others since I find it curious that FOC is the only one who uses summaries and that the others...

Discussion moved to talk page with a reminder to avoid personalization and WP:FOC. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC) If FA status is going to...

(talk) removed. Category:FL-Class Powderfinger articles (talk) removed. FOC (album) (talk) removed. Far Out Corporation (talk) removed. WP:Featured topics/Dream...

exploit IMPFV you FOC call ‘It is a great deed which calls you…’ From La prise de Dionkoloni, line 245 and Yoruba Olú ni ó ra iṣu. Olu FOC 3S buy yams ‘It...

themselves. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:45, 3 October 2015 (UTC) How about you WP:FOC instead, avoid taking on a battleground mentality, and follow WP:BLP? --Ronz...

It looks like personal attack. This is not neutral, but editorial. [WP:FOC] &) Cablebill: (The current section is specific to brothers and should be...

Herman Mishkin; restored by Adam Cuerden Sherman's March to the Sea by F.O.C. Darley and Alexander Hay Ritchie, restored by Adam Cuerden Lawrence Joseph...

in an AFD. Try harder. postdlf (talk) 17:45, 17 July 2014 (UTC) Please WP:FOC. I had hoped we'd have editors experienced with AfDs, especially where WP:BLP...

2) to w:ru:RFactor (diff - undo) - Link: vfoc.net/vFOC.net. * Links added in this diff: vfoc.net/vFOC.net (2, 7, 2, 0) 2009-12-31 08:37:11 (UTC): User w:ru:94...

these personal remarks and speculations are out of place here. Please see WP:FOC. With regard to local coverage, here is the relevant section of WP:CORPDEPTH:...

the industry" are generally considered inappropriate on Wikipedia per WP:FOC. See also Don't push (the second paragraph especially). You may wish to ask...

today; having looked at it a little long, I have decided to place it here for FOC status because I feel the map does a good job of showing just how many things...

Link: www.defenceupdates.com/tejas-test-fires-bvr-missile-rushes-towards-foc/ (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2017-05-16 15:24:44 (UTC): User 122.160.88.72 t • c •...

INFOCOMM, STOC all tier 1 conferences. There are other papers in SOCA and FOCS as well (also tier 1). Undoubtedly notable.--DreamLinker (talk) 05:42, 11...

didn't my approach in my indented paragraph above find that? I treat the FOCs as a 2-variable system parametric on lambda: 2 λ x + 0 y = 1 {\displaystyle...

correctly pointed out that those issues are a matter for WP:AN/I, as WP:FOC does apply to AfD. The primary issue here revolves around what is considered...

| links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: www.nicolle-associates.com/foc.html (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2008-05-08 06:57:23 (UTC): User 86.166.148.162...

| links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: www.nicolle-associates.com/foc.html (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2008-05-08 06:57:23 (UTC): User 86.166.148.162...

offer their inputs.Kailasher (talk) 08:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC) Please WP:FOC. If you're not interested in addressing the WP:BLP and WP:COPYVIO problems...

sources? —  HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK 11:45, 21 January 2026 (UTC) A reminder that WP:FOC applies here. 11WB (talk) 15:51, 21 January 2026 (UTC) So instead of answering...

irrelevant to the process, and you, bluntly, are failing to adhere to WP:FOC. EF5 13:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC) Hi. In case you haven't followed everything...

statements are obviously for Network Rail. TOCs and FOCs and the station management (who tend to be TOCs or FOCs) have their own statements, processes etc. Then...

under and immediately this article came to mind. Please do keep in mind WP:FOC, though. — EF5 17:57, 23 April 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

offer their inputs.Kailasher (talk) 08:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC) Please WP:FOC. If you're not interested in addressing the WP:BLP and WP:COPYVIO problems...

been disputed. Relisting to allow for further input. A reminder that WP:FOC applies, and not to cast accusations of disruptive editing at other participants...

"New NP-hard and NP-complete polynomial and integer divisibility problems", FOCS 1977). That said, this article doesn't touch on any of that, its references...

page recreation. Regarding whether it was proper to create a redirect WP:FOC says not to focus on the conduct, just the content. Whatever has happened...

weighing consensus. Not to mention that some are here blatantly violating WP:FOC. They seem to be focused on continuing battleground behavior instead, which...

main issue appears to be the photographer itself, and we need to Wikipedia:FOC. EF5 14:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC) I won't go into the merits, and I hope ArionStar...

offer their inputs.Kailasher (talk) 08:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC) Please WP:FOC. If you're not interested in addressing the WP:BLP and WP:COPYVIO problems...

disagree. Feeling personally attacked from your work here is a big issue. (WP:FOC) The goal should always be for the wiki guidelines to prevail. Please note...

article, particularly those that are WP:PRIMARY. A reminder to follow WP:FOC and not make personal remarks about other editors. Relisting. Please add...

should be deleted because it is the opposite of community standards. Use WP:FOC or similar to tell people to talk about content, not contributors. There...

Green's house, Savannah Ga, now occupied as Head Quarters by Gen Sherman F.O.C. Darley and Alexander Hay Ritchie - Sherman's March to the Sea Georgia Aquarium...

installation screen even if I go into the drive and run it manually), and FOC refuses to reinstall without EAW being reinstalled. Thanks! 97.125.84.72...

avoid disputes by focusing on article content rather than editor conduct WP:FOC. Recent arbitration committee findings state that The committee also encouraged...

high, is listed as the tallest building before 1988, whereas 'Foişorul de Foc', which is lower at 42 m, is listed as the tallest beginning since 1890....

Rating Required expansion Far Out Corporation Stub Band photo, general info FOC Stub General expansion, producer, track times, release date, singles etc...

(Barcelona Metro) Fira 1 (Barcelona Metro) Fira 2-Pedrosa (Barcelona Metro) Foc Cisell (Barcelona Metro) INEF (Barcelona Metro) Mas Blau (Barcelona Metro)...

violates WP:LINKLOVE & WP:OUTING, #2 violates WP:FOC,#3 violates WP:FOC and WP:EW, #4 violates WP:FOC and WP:EW. I don't have time to defend myself here...

Link: www.defenceupdates.com/tejas-test-fires-bvr-missile-rushes-towards-foc/ (R/Xmeta/L) 2017-05-16 15:24:44 (UTC): User 122.160.88.72 t • c • dc • l •...

stuff like "Go FOC yourself" doesn't serve your argument well. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 19:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC) "Go FOC yourself" – He's...

sentence ever appear. FoC is just trying to malign me with acts I've never done before. -Hmib 21:06, 21 August 2005 (UTC) If FoC supplies the correct diffs...

no one has responded either. Flowerofchivalry 07:33, 12 July 2005 (UTC) FoC, have you used either or both of those IP addresses? And is Pedant still...

personalized so would like to warn Artemaeus Creed about WP:SUMMARYNO and WP:FOC. There are cases of edit warring but it's not obvious to me if it sometimes...

or for WP:AGF in regard to our well-sourced contributions, nor did he WP:FOC, he ignored WP:EW and WP:3rr warnings regarding his boundary crossing, and...

WP:FOC policy. Comments about my supposed motivations are not focusing on the content in question. The insulting comment above is anything but FOC. If...

2013 (UTC) Comment I think we need to focus on the article itself as per WP:FOC and not on other editor's perceived shortcomings. Mabalu (talk) 22:38, 17...

violates WP:LINKLOVE & WP:OUTING, #2 violates WP:FOC,#3 violates WP:FOC and WP:EW, #4 violates WP:FOC and WP:EW. -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 02:27, 28 January...

breach of 3RR here. Perhaps more worryingly, he or she is refusing to WP:FOC and insists that additions from a particular user are de facto "bad faith"...

Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC) Friends of Chuck (FOC) (edit, talk, history, links) — http://www.friendsofchuck.net/. CSBot reporting...

I can help out here! FourOfCups (talk) 17:00, 22 December 2014 (UTC) Hi FOC. I have placed some links on your talk page. Read through and look at some...

in an encyclopedia article. The editors have already been pointed to WP:FOC. This borders on harassment at this point. --Ronz (talk) 15:20, 19 May 2016...

TP contained two completely unfounded attacks not only failing WP:AGF, WP:FOC and WP:NPA but even accusing me of an edit I had not done. The term "climate...

Cirt (talk) 23:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC) User:MusicAngels is violating WC:FOC and WC:AGF in his reversions of what seems to be good, well sourced, and...

WP:NPA! I already advised you here—User talk:Bilby#Nofel Izz—to imbibe WP:FOC, and stop making accusations which you cannot substantiate; besides, Wikipedia:Conflict...

Binksternet (talk) 14:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC) Thanks for the WP:IDHT, WP:FOC-violating responses. Please feel free to add more in case this needs to go...

creating non-notable articles is not block-worthy. AfD is subject to WP:FOC, so this would need to be discussed at a different venue, if at all. Whilst...

of heat with his own. DavRosen (talk) 16:29, 21 July 2013 (UTC) What? WP:FOC applies. Apteva (talk) 20:00, 21 July 2013 (UTC) What? Focus on Content is...

FNK FNL FNM FNN FNO FNP FNQ FNR FNS FNT FNU FNV FNW FNX FNY FNZ FOA FOB FOC FOD FOE FOF FOG FOH FOI FOJ FOK FOL FOM FON FOO FOP FOQ FOR FOS FOT FOU FOV...

necessary for you to argue with every comment here. Also, please read WP:FOC and try to remain focused on content, not contributors. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell...

warning, but a day later.... 15:19, 15 October 2013 user posts uncivil anti-FOC and anti-AGFWP:BATTLEGROUND climate change POV on his talk page saying: "Not...

by not getting involved (except insofar as I file this report and offer FOC-y (not phoque-y) suggestions on the TP). -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 23:23, 31...

(talk) 11:37, 14 December 2025 (UTC) Late reply, but your comment violates WP:FOC. Please be more respectful to other editors, regardless of ongoing disputes...

out for a stroll! jps (talk) 16:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC) Please read WP:FOC.DrChrissy (talk) 16:22, 25 January 2016 (UTC) Please read WP:DENY. We can...

the next similarly named page. Additionally, they consistently violate WP:FOC, which is policy, by ranting about other editors (I've lost track how many...

critical stage of resolving disputes and of making decisions. Shortcut WP:FOCWP:FOC Focus on the content of Wikipedia articles, not on the editor making a given...

pictures/History/American Civil War Creator Alexander Hay Ritchie after F.O.C. Darley; restored by Adam Cuerden Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has...

or article talk page, ever. It simply is not appropriate. That is what WP:FOC discusses. Focus on content, not conduct. Apteva (talk) 03:13, 11 January...

about the phrase, then involved eds should make greater reliance on RSs, WP:FOC, and make effective use of the increasing levels of WP:DR.NewsAndEventsGuy...

already overly-lengthy discussion. As I've already brought up WP:IDHT and WP:FOC to the discussion, I think a reminder of WP:NOTBATTLE is appropriate now...

of FOC and Choice get stripped out/pared down and placed in the FOC (economics) article leaving brief synopses and "See main" hatnotes in both FOC & Choice...

They have questioned me on my talk, but not even a single line does WP:FOC. They ask me why I feel authorized, ask me to justify my "authority", ask...

planning on opening a case here just after I read the last attack on me by FOC. But I was just going to put it off for a few hours because I was watching...

id=YKP_KZGD7dwC&pg=PP2&lpg=PP2&dq=%22no+nukes+everyone's+guide%22&source=web&ots=-IjPQ4qFOc&sig=dCI6oFgIB1fqE36EHPl25kRB32Y#PPP1,M1. 2007-11-27 16:29:01: User en:Waacstats...

everybody's attention on individual users rather than issues, contrary to what WP:FOC recommends. Since there is no rush for this issue, I will therefore put this...

to detach an administrator to supervise matters and enforce WP:NPA / WP:FOC. These are kind of replies that are left out there right now: Revision as...

unusual job), is not an indication of notability.' I'm also going to cite WP:FOC here. Comments about whether I performed a BEFORE check (which I did) are...

presidential campaign Sashi demonstrates pretty clearly their belief that WP:FOC to everyone except them. I recently raised issues about personal attacks...

initial assessment still holds that ideally if everyone just follows WP:FOC hereforward in these discussions this can all just be water under the bridge...

apply to all editors, not just one who actually seems to be following WP:FOC here. Kingofaces43 (talk) 20:52, 6 October 2019 (UTC) Support: But definitely...

Ford Motor Company to post an essay evaluating HughD at article talk WP:FOC 10 April 2016 Springee campaigning. 11 April 2016 Springee campaigning, as...

realize, not everything is based on selling. We do as I have said provide f.o.c. help for people. The link you deleted just ask within the section if they...

of knowledge onto others." 18 December: WP:FOC and WP:CIVIL: "No I cant help you to read" 23 December: WP:FOC and WP:BATTLE: "This kind of extremist attitude...

Wimpus (and anyone) should still use informative edit summaries and WP:FOC. I'm certainly not disputing that. Crossroads -talk- 23:00, 22 December 2022...

with sub-sections, where possible. This particular comment, contrary to WP:FOC, focused on me and my allegedly problematic behavior. It belonged somewhere...

Gwern has exhibited in the mentioned AfDs and talk pages. (inability to WP:FOC, sniping at editors on content discussion pages, etc.) this does look like...

reply in this thread until some admin is involved. (B)I will continue to WP:FOC in the climate articles where this editor has made a sudden splash of large...

warning, but a day later.... 15:19, 15 October 2013 user posts uncivil anti-FOC and anti-AGFWP:BATTLEGROUND climate change POV on his talk page saying: "Not...

grab us by the short hairs. Under the DR policy, faiulure to WP:FOC is failure to WP:FOC. In my view we should be working harder against low level in civility...

infrequently with uncivil comments that either assume bad faith or fail to FOC. I have trouble believing Wikipedia as a whole is better for Snoogan's edits...

they are just as credible. Buffs (talk) 03:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC) Please FOC, not on me. It's tiring. We are justified in calling The Daily Wire a "fringe...

the talk page about the different proposal and it would be better to WP:FOC on the talk page. QuackGuru (talk) 20:20, 14 March 2016 (UTC) Can you ever...

matter how right or wrong you are about the underlying content dispute. WP:FOC is applicable. Kingsindian ♝♚ 08:22, 27 November 2015 (UTC) I don't particularly...

Never behind the user's back, and not to complicate content discussions (WP:FOC).—Bagumba (talk) 00:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC) BHG, please present and refer...

with Guy Macon. Lamassus needs to review WP:BATTLEGROUND, WP:AGF, and WP:FOC, and refrain from turning discussions into battles between good guys and...

templates or the copyvio removal then discuss it on the talk page, follow WP:FOC, and try to WP:AGF. Had you just opened a thread asking why the changes were...

to PVJ is, "Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz, would you please read WP:AGF and WP:FOC." PVJ has made many very useful contributions and I hope will continue to...

toxicity, and she called a bluff on getting reported on ANI. WP:DISENGAGE, WP:FOC —Partytemple (talk) 19:50, 19 July 2019 (UTC) Good point at the end. Disengage...

guideline in content disputes and needlessly personalizes content disputes WP:FOC. Talk page contributions are valued by their content not by the contribution...

less than 2 months so perhaps this is just new editor not understanding WP:FOC. Springee (talk) 19:18, 18 September 2019 (UTC) I'm going to go out on a...

WP:WIKILAWYERING, this despite previous warnings. They've been warned about WP:PA/WP:FOC and WP:SPA/WP:HERE by myself here (it wasn't the first behavioral issue but...

attack another editor when dealing with a content dispute? (Please see WP:FOC and WP:NPA)? -- Jytdog (talk) 21:48, 27 January 2018 (UTC) It is also worth...

August 2021 (UTC) A clear warning that such behavior is not acceptable. FOC, not the editors would be fine. So long as the problem stops nothing more...

conduct, and remember this noticeboard is for content disputes only." WP:FOC recommends not bringing up conduct during content disputes. I patiently waited...

Template:Cycling data BTA -> Bike Technologies Australia 1 Template:Cycling data FOC -> Team Focus 1 Template:Cycling data HKP -> Hong Kong Pro Cycling 1 Template:Cycling...

pages." I previously explained on the talk page to focus on content. See WP:FOC: "Focus on article content during discussions, not on editor conduct; comment...

especially new editors, don't understand the difference between NPA and FOC. If I call another editor an A-hole, that's a pretty clear personal attack...

have given you on your talk, which seems to be falling on deaf ears: WP:FOC. If you are not able to do that, I am coming to the concern (considering...

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1063#Request to enforce WP:FOC & WP:NPA in Talk:Malassezia) However, the reason I'm commenting on this dispute...

January, which is great for them), and the reason pretty much comes down to WP:FOC and WP:CIVIL. Light2021 the meat of this case is that you are too passionate...

worth his precious time. Look at his talk page. One recent response was "FOC yourself" which is obvious and then said. "Please go f*** yourself" to another...

fnk fnl fnm fnn fno fnp fnq fnr fns fnt fnu fnv fnw fnx fny fnz foa fob foc fod foe fof fog foh foi foj fok fol fom fon foo fop foq for fos fot fou fov...

well-formed and connected to policy. Mark doesn't do a 100% perfect job of WP:FOC and does sometimes take mild or indirect jabs at other editors, but I read...

this in my open access article in FoC. On the Scerri-Parsons argument I addressed this in the same article in FoC. On the use of my sources not being...

October 2015 A reminder to complainant to focus on content and not editors WP:FOC A reminder to complainant to kindly limit future reports to edits that harm...

here, looks like frequent behavioral commentary at article talk, despite WP:FOC and that's a form of harrassment as surely as hounding. I'm not here to jump...

subject-matter expertise that can benefit Wikipedia. A warning to follow WP:FOC and try to keep cool and maintain more formal courtesy might have sufficed...

couldn't see much in them but your diffs show there is too much lack of WP:FOC. That may apply to several others in the area but that can be considered...

are not the place to make accusations?[24] And, again remind the editor to FOC? O3000 (talk) 13:07, 21 April 2020 (UTC) Request that Wikieditor19920's be...

Metro) Eixample Nord (Barcelona Metro) El Prat Intermodal (Barcelona Metro) Foc Cisell (Barcelona Metro) La Foixarda (Barcelona Metro) La Morera (Barcelona...

guidance from El_C but anything from a final warning about WP:AGF and WP:FOC to a ban of some kind seems appropriate. A warning for a topic like this...

information, not the formatting of valid arguments. Please adhere to WP:FOC (Focus on Content) and WP:NPA (No Personal Attacks). Dismissing a detailed...

in 1) 2023 IEEE 64th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) (3 in 1, 2) 2024 6th Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for...

in 1) 2023 IEEE 64th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) (3 in 1, 2) 25th Annual Symposium on Frequency Control (1 in 1) 28th IEEE...

Crisis of Identity? (2 in 1, 2) Fight On! (1 in 1) Fire!!! (12 in 11) Foc al Foc! Goliardo Fiaschi: Una Vita per l'Anarchia (1 in 1) Folker! (1 in 1) Fontos...

requirements.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:35, 4 November 2016 (UTC) Comment. WP:FOC is such a useful and valuable policy to keep in mind when commenting on Wikipedia...

others of FOC in a comment that almost exclusively was commenting on other editors yourself. Sergecross73 msg me 14:10, 17 April 2026 (UTC) FOC can be invoked...

imperative to have the template on a live page. In addition, please read WP:FOC. The template relates to the external link guidelines, and we can focus on...

which no one responded to, to get a response is part of it. I recommend WP:FOC. The ping was off-topic but I'll address it because threats are being made[8]...

None of my comments in this AfD equate bludgeoning. I suggest you read WP:FOC. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 13:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC) It is a essay that you'd do well...

pages; anyone can insert in others' comments HOPE - Eds will be trained to WP:FOC NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 07:59, 29 July 2014 (UTC) You must be kidding. Andy...

than I can count. Take the high road and move on by civilly practicing WP:FOC. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 00:28, 27 June 2014 (UTC) On the internet, lots...

name calling, which is never the way to resolve content disputes. See WP:FOC. Apteva (talk) 20:11, 3 December 2012 (UTC) You are clearly wrong about this...

editor. All complaints about the editor's behavior are countered with "WP:FOC, please". I'm aware of several essays, like Wikipedia:Tagging pages for problems...

EoL: 39853865 EPPO: 1NARG FloraBase: 21239 FNA: 121652 FoAO2: Narcissus FoC: 121652 GBIF (old): 2858200 GRIN: 7979 iNaturalist: 53597 IPNI: 1558-1 IRMNG:...

journals but conference proceedings of two premier conference series called FOCS and STOC. I did not see anything like that in Bauer's record either (although...

@Pokelego999 'trying this before to no avail' is a borderline violation of WP:FOC. PL is a respectable editor and the focus should be on content and not conduct...

themselves. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:45, 3 October 2015 (UTC) How about you WP:FOC instead, avoid taking on a battleground mentality, and follow WP:BLP? --Ronz...

today; having looked at it a little long, I have decided to place it here for FOC status because I feel the map does a good job of showing just how many things...

not fall under ABF. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 17:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC) Per WP:FOC. The purpose of talk pages is to discuss content and articles WP:TALK#USE...

tried to direct them towards discussing content. Huge failure to WP:FOC there. Another FOC failure with accusations of editors with "known pro agrobusiness...

_George_Washington_entering_New_York,_1783._Copy_of_print_by_A._H._Ritchie_after_F.O.C._Darley.,_1_-_NARA_-_532881.tif. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:50, 23 March 2019...

in an AFD. Try harder. postdlf (talk) 17:45, 17 July 2014 (UTC) Please WP:FOC. I had hoped we'd have editors experienced with AfDs, especially where WP:BLP...

disregard that warning.[25] and has focused on Me and not content or issues WP:FOC The comments of "lame" and "sloppy" and criticizing my post to another editor...

of "topic" ban improvement could cover any inkling of WP:HOUNDING and WP:FOC given the WP:ROPE issue. Kingofaces43 (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)...

121 (talk) 20:14, 1 July 2013 (UTC) With all due respect, please follow WP:FOC Sources that are not reliable shouldn't be used as references. Nor should...

required in discussing the content and refrain from personal attacks. WP:FOC I believe I have shown plenty of patience in allowing you to resume discussion...

in media. Fine part, yet not about the subject, but about users. See WP:FOC for more info. There is not just some. There is all. Important parts are...

offer their inputs.Kailasher (talk) 08:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC) Please WP:FOC. If you're not interested in addressing the WP:BLP and WP:COPYVIO problems...

journals but conference proceedings of two premier conference series called FOCS and STOC. I did not see anything like that in Bauer's record either (although...

that I should never discuss a contributor on an article talk page per WP:FOC. I care about guidelines and wanted to clarify this with the wider community...

strongest Support for --- focus on the edits, not the editor --- per WP:FOC. Peace! 22:34, 1 March 2012 (UTC) Strongly oppose We already have enough...

impact and no WP:SUSTAINED coverage. And while I understand that I should WP:FOC with this, I think it's important to note that the article creator wrote...

but then, you would, wouldn't you? :). What do you say we both simply WP:FOC and stop assigning hidden agendas to other editors? The section you point...

undisputed as fraudulent. Once again, please focus on policy and content per WP:FOC. --Ronz (talk) 01:08, 19 June 2013 (UTC) It not being disputed in the past...

None of my comments in this AfD equate bludgeoning. I suggest you read WP:FOC. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 13:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC) It is a essay that you'd do well...

demonstrating it is deserved). (If responding, please review WP:CONLEVEL and WP:FOC). --Ronz (talk) 17:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC) Okay I reviewed those two....

de-orphanage a page which has now more than three relevant links? MattiaFoc —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattiafoc (talk • contribs) 16:26, 30...

address the question at hand? Buffs (talk) 21:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC) WP:FOC. --Ronz (talk) 00:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC) YHGBKM! Your entire statement impugned...

2013 (UTC) Comment I think we need to focus on the article itself as per WP:FOC and not on other editor's perceived shortcomings. Mabalu (talk) 22:38, 17...

vertical deploy F-15EX Eagle II F-16 Fighting Falcons above New York City(2) F.O.C. Darley and Alexander Hay Ritchie - Sherman's March to the Sea FA-18 Automated...

musicbox-online.com/bobm-int.html (5006, 188, 1, 1) books.google.com/books?id=bsutwd7d_foc&pg=pa202&lpg=pa202&dq=perry+lane+lesh&source=web&ots=d0q2zud_-r&sig=v7z7...

alternative to 4.2A. Ncmvocalist (talk) 12:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC) Per WP:FOC The most important first step is to focus on content, and not on editors...

formal processes or third-party intervention. Focus on content Shortcut: WP:FOC Further information: Wikipedia:Editing policy The most important first step...

necessary for you to argue with every comment here. Also, please read WP:FOC and try to remain focused on content, not contributors. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell...

these personal remarks and speculations are out of place here. Please see WP:FOC. With regard to local coverage, here is the relevant section of WP:CORPDEPTH:...

"New NP-hard and NP-complete polynomial and integer divisibility problems", FOCS 1977). That said, this article doesn't touch on any of that, its references...

required in discussing the content and refrain from personal attacks. WP:FOC I believe I have shown plenty of patience in allowing you to resume discussion...

the industry" are generally considered inappropriate on Wikipedia per WP:FOC. See also Don't push (the second paragraph especially). You may wish to ask...

in media. Fine part, yet not about the subject, but about users. See WP:FOC for more info. There is not just some. There is all. Important parts are...

editors, please refrain from commenting on your fellow editor's actions per WP:FOC— fcsuper (How's That?, That's How!) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) — 06:12...

question allow this subject to meet WP:GNG. Please see WP:NPA, WP:CIV and WP:FOC. Besides which, if this style is not-notable enough to meet WP:GNG (I had...

FNK FNL FNM FNN FNO FNP FNQ FNR FNS FNT FNU FNV FNW FNX FNY FNZ FOA FOB FOC FOD FOE FOF FOG FOH FOI FOJ FOK FOL FOM FON FOO FOP FOQ FOR FOS FOT FOU FOV...

Proceedings of the 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) ? — ? 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) Proceedings of the 40th...

22nd ICML ? — ? 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) Proc. 24 IEEE FOCS ? — ? 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) Proc. 26th Allerton Conf...

and create a request in a new section. In short, Leyo has not followed WP:FOC and has chastised me for years for sticking to the expectations from the...

Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) Proceedings of 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on FOCS ? — ? 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) Proceedings of 4th European...

question allow this subject to meet WP:GNG. Please see WP:NPA, WP:CIV and WP:FOC. Besides which, if this style is not-notable enough to meet WP:GNG (I had...

requirements.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:35, 4 November 2016 (UTC) Comment. WP:FOC is such a useful and valuable policy to keep in mind when commenting on Wikipedia...

StateHort. Soc. ? — ? 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) Proc. FOCS ? — ? 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) Proc. Fourth Annual IEEE...

about the phrase, then involved eds should make greater reliance on RSs, WP:FOC, and make effective use of the increasing levels of WP:DR.NewsAndEventsGuy...

primarily about the content and starts being about the contributors (i.e. WP:FOC). I'm not necessarily talking about one-off comments, of course, but rather...

posting that above, please take me to WP:ANI. If not, I would suggest you WP:FOC or you may find yourself there. I still have not seen a valid argument from...

vertical deploy F-15EX Eagle II F-16 Fighting Falcons above New York City(2) F.O.C. Darley and Alexander Hay Ritchie - Sherman's March to the Sea FA-18 Automated...

and suggesting as much is clearly not in the spirit of either WP:CIV or WP:FOC. There is a reference to the artist being listed as PeekYou's "most influential...

weighing consensus. Not to mention that some are here blatantly violating WP:FOC. They seem to be focused on continuing battleground behavior instead, which...

demonstrating it is deserved). (If responding, please review WP:CONLEVEL and WP:FOC). --Ronz (talk) 17:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC) Okay I reviewed those two....

behavior in itself. SageRad (talk) 16:34, 15 October 2015 (UTC) We have WP:FOC (which is policy) for a reason. It's very clear on this. Kingofaces43 (talk)...

INFOCOMM, STOC all tier 1 conferences. There are other papers in SOCA and FOCS as well (also tier 1). Undoubtedly notable.--DreamLinker (talk) 05:42, 11...

and FOC? In other articles I have sometimes highlighted those by underlining instead of bolding the text. Let me try: àxwé yé Kòfí tù   (house FOC Kofi...

undisputed as fraudulent. Once again, please focus on policy and content per WP:FOC. --Ronz (talk) 01:08, 19 June 2013 (UTC) It not being disputed in the past...

fr:Saint-Christophe-du-Foc - it:Saint-Christophe-du-Foc - nl:Saint-Christophe-du-Foc - pl:Saint-Christophe-du-Foc - pt:Saint-Christophe-du-Foc - perhaps Saint-Christophe-du-Foc...

must strike your unfounded accusations against other editors and read WP:FOC. Orientls (talk) 10:46, 1 December 2025 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NBUILD and...

formal processes or third-party intervention. Focus on content Shortcut: WP:FOC Further information: Wikipedia:Editing policy The most important first step...

know that can be more easily said than done. Secondly focus on content, WP:FOC in Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. At this stage could you focus on the three...

Rompez, vagues! Rompez d’eaux réjouies Ce toit tranquille où picoraient des focs! –⊥¡ɐɔıʇǝoNoetica!T– 02:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC) I see "semel vivitur"...

my user talk page telling me, it's not for the article's talk page, to WP:FOC, and talk to administrators about it on the appropriate boards. I reiterated...

Objective3000 (talk) 14:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC) Ondertitel, please WP:FOC. We need evidence that it is reliable. So far, it appears as a reliable source...

answer in the Nanking Massacre talk page. Mandel July 9, 2005 10:31 (UTC) FoC seems to use a great deal (if not exclusively) Japanese source material,...

(J·M·T) Foarm Magazine ? — ? 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) Foc al Foc! Goliardo Fiaschi: Una Vita per l'Anarchia ? — ? 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T)...

com/mehter www.mehtertv.com www.mehter.com muwi.tk/MC5/wlc/mcb/cul/mim/mfl/mtm/foc/foc0000000001.htm www.theottomans.org/english/campaigns_army/index.asp. 2007-12-26...

lpg=PA56&dq=turks+living+in+germany&source=web&ots=y8y4zH0x2Z&sig=djCIkYgFOcGRdBcunK5wMfVpvB0&hl=en#PPA55,M1 (252, 25545, 6, -3) www.ukrcensus.gov...

specifically Bridge, not the rest of the disputes on the related pages. Please WP:FOC, not other editors. Springee (talk) 02:59, 9 January 2021 (UTC) Springee...

w:ca:User:88.2.133.12 (t - c; 10) to w:ca:Concurs Internacional de Castells de Focs Artificials Ciutat de Tarragona (diff  !top) - Link: webfacil.tinet...

links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: bp1.blogger.com/_Sar8IPNlxOY/RlFOcYaBjgI/AAAAAAAAAkc/gM4nV1PCTV0/s1600-h/taliafour.jpg (R/Xmeta/L) 2019-11-22...

which the licensing authorities never put into circulation – for example FOC (a mild version of something else) and other obvious ones like GOD. Over...

contributors. In fact, this dispute could probably use a whole lot more FOC from everyone involved. Woodroar (talk) 17:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC) Thank...

initial deployment, were designed with their own corrective optics. When the FOC is replaced by the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) during Servicing Mission...

present form. Thanks.Griswaldo (talk) 21:33, 4 January 2011 (UTC) Please WP:FOC. That is the problem here. Personalizing disputes only hinders resolving...

asp?xItem=61046&ctNode=5 news.chinatimes.com/2007Cti/2007Cti-Focus/2007Cti-Foc. * User is on global Whitelist: voabot ii <-> * (Bots don't have a COI) 2008-01-14...

www.shapeways.com/blog/archives/407-Shapeways-interviews-Janne-Kyttanen-of-FOC.html (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2015-11-18 17:51:22 (UTC): w:sr:User:Socaacos...

posting that above, please take me to WP:ANI. If not, I would suggest you WP:FOC or you may find yourself there. I still have not seen a valid argument from...

Let’s remember WP:CIVIL and keep the focus on content and sourcing per WP:FOC. My intent has been to clarify the notability and sourcing issues under WP:GNG...

other attacks as a bludgeon in content disputes (i.e., outright ignoring WP:FOC). As mentioned in the first AE, Leyo was reminded of that by me prior to...

watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: jeffhuang.com/best_paper_awards.html#focs (R/Xmeta/L) 2017-06-27 09:07:16 (UTC): w:he:User:BDaniel (t - c; 1253) to...

bad-faith accusation of straw men again. For someone who repeatedly claims FOC, you show no interest in following that policy. Rules for thee but not for...

July 2014 (UTC) Sorry about bringing up OSE here. Retracted. Could you WP:FOC please? This has been brought up, yet you continue. While you've repeatedly...

February 2026 (UTC) Responding to @Relton66. I would normally invoke WP:FOC here, but you do make a legitimate point. I am unsure if action can be taken...

U2AQaBAgICEIMCxCwjKcIGmIKYAgDEijUHNYcnxvOH8kcxBzPH8Ec0xzfHMY5xzmGO_1cuyDnFOcI5zD7qJPYuGjCPnqvig_19tEMzNYI86mz1gjxSxOsYsdtkKiMvqCwxvF8ulF_1Ozl5guSdWUi...

the discussion should focus on the proposal, not the proposer, and that WP:FOC should be extended to these proposals (although, obviously, a separate proposal...

and FOC? In other articles I have sometimes highlighted those by underlining instead of bolding the text. Let me try: àxwé yé Kòfí tù   (house FOC Kofi...

(J·M·T) 2023 IEEE 64th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) ? — ? 3 1, 2 1.500 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) 2023 MTV Video Music...

the entire talk page by anyone concerned will be revealing. Meanwhile, WP:FOC is a key aspect of Wikipedia editing that can be pointed out. Regards, SandyGeorgia...

If you can't explain yourself, you won't change consensus. And please WP:FOC. --Ronz (talk) 01:04, 20 March 2013 (UTC) Well, that would certainly be a...

for most of the free cities). I need time to merge this in. Future info. FoC has a lot of info that was not available in the first three books. However...

why you think not. Dicklyon (talk) 20:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC) Please WP:FOC. You might want to start with WP:ELBURDEN. --Ronz (talk) 20:07, 9 January...

assessment of the editing environment. IDIDNTHEARTHAT, WP:CONLIMITED, and WP:FOC problems... As for FRINGE, we're trying to get around the FRINGE problems...

primarily about the content and starts being about the contributors (i.e. WP:FOC). I'm not necessarily talking about one-off comments, of course, but rather...

for most of the free cities). I need time to merge this in. Future info. FoC has a lot of info that was not available in the first three books. However...

changes there. FUZHOU (CHANGLE) INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Iata Airport Code: FOC Location: Fuzhou Changle International Airport is situated in the southeast...

editors. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 19:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC) Please WP:FOC I hope that you are aware this has all been discussed before, and that I...

feedback on this, the better. Dream Focus 20:35, 29 July 2015 (UTC) Do WP:FOC. As already pointed out to you, WP:SEEKHELP specifically recommends the use...

to talk and wp spaces and it is nowhere near "climate change denier". WP:FOC can be appealed to, but at the end of the day leeway is generally given when...

"old". If you continue your personal comments you risk being sanctioned. WP:FOC. We need to reflect the WP:BESTSOURCES giving the current scientific view...

various lists. Correct? --Ronz (talk) 14:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC) Please wp:FOC and avoid characterizing the motives of other editors. Thank-you.--S Philbrick(Talk)...

(talk) 19:31, 5 December 2010 (UTC) Thanks, but I'm not sure about 1) as FOCs are often used to look through in medical or other situations. Regarding...

Flipped_Out_Cookie, but FoC has offered a “noob-less” forum site simply called “teh forum” for MR members, such as Storagebox_7,FoC himself, Baker, and more...

deciding (with no doubt increasing levels of exasperation at the lack of WP:FOC). What I have argued, repeatedly, is that WP:POLICY gives us no choice but...

you actually continuing to complain about? A good guidelines to read is WP:FOC, focus on content. But somehow you want to continue to focus on one editor...

URL: http://archives.hud.gov/images/focus/foc-picw-2003-04-07a.jpg http://archives.hud.gov/images/focus/foc-picw-2003-05-14.jpg http://archives.hud...

writing about ships. jps (talk) 21:09, 22 July 2020 (UTC) 1. Please remember FOC and CIVIL. 2. If the Laffer Curve isn't the subject of this section then...

FNK FNL FNM FNN FNO FNP FNQ FNR FNS FNT FNU FNV FNW FNX FNY FNZ FOA FOB FOC FOD FOE FOF FOG FOH FOI FOJ FOK FOL FOM FON FOO FOP FOQ FOR FOS FOT FOU FOV...

his POV at my bio.Rick Alan Ross (talk) 18:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC) Please WP:FOC. --Ronz (talk) 18:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC) Okay, that's fine. I can see how...

discussion with flinging barely useful references to things like WP:1AM and WP:FOC (the latter, ironically, by the editor not being focused on the content at...

here but instead focused on making unubstianted complaint about me? Read WP:FOC and comment only on content. 2402:3A80:16A9:FD37:E68F:114D:5DA9:46D0 (talk)...

move it the other way. SageRad (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2015 (UTC) Please WP:FOC and try to refrain from using this forum (and the article) as a battleground...

Florya Atatürk Marine Mansion Flossenbürg concentration camp Foişorul de Foc Folly Farm Adventure Park and Zoo Fondaco dei Turchi Fondation Calvet Fondation...

24 September 2013 (UTC) As editors can see from the above, there are WP:FOC and WP:OWN problems as well. --Ronz (talk) 16:44, 24 September 2013 (UTC)...

your editing? 6YearsTillRetirement (talk) 12:39, 17 September 2019 (UTC) WP:FOC Springee (talk) 13:09, 17 September 2019 (UTC) Ridiculous response. You're...

summary.ask2.org/detail/EURO-2016 (75510, 354, X, X R/X/L) www.eflora.cn/foc/pdf/Fagaceae.pdf (75510, 38, X, X R/X/L) www.newstatesman...

com/uploads/fitna-tul-wahhabiyyah.pdf (12064, , X, X- R/X/L) books.google.com/books?id=focLrox-frUC&printsec=frontcover&dq=New+Encyclopedia+of+Islam+by+Cyril+Glass...

initial nomination message whilst quite lengthy, did not at all violate WP:FOC. It respectfully focused on content only. I will concede that the sources...

anything out. We do charge (some) of our advertisers (charities are generally FOC), income goes primarily to running the site (hosting, third party external...

relevant to this topic. Dream Focus 23:26, 7 September 2012 (UTC) Please WP:FOC. Multiple editors have responded here. I believe I've summarized the comments...

past: [23] Logos (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC) Probably better to WP:FOC than start spouting off about "some users". And yes, WP:Articles for deletion/The...

When in dispute, you are to comment on the edits, not the editor (see WP:FOC). Don't waste time trying to rationalise it, or say you meant something else...

pretty lengthy, but I don't think it's fair to say I can't give my opinion... FOC generally prohibits commenting on editor conduct here, but I am concerned...

actions required, if any, can we focus on the content of this article (WP:FOC)? Can we get rid of the entirely self referenced content and wait for the...

this are problematic when trying to address content disputes [[22]]. Please FOC and remain CIVIL. Springee (talk) 18:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC) I think both...

URL: http://archives.hud.gov/images/focus/foc-picw-2003-04-07a.jpg http://archives.hud.gov/images/focus/foc-picw-2003-05-14.jpg http://archives.hud...

overall cancer incidence --Rose (talk) 06:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC) Please WP:FOC - you have a strange idea of what "completely different" means! You are again...

EoL: 39853865 EPPO: 1NARG FloraBase: 21239 FNA: 121652 FoAO2: Narcissus FoC: 121652 GBIF (old): 2858200 GRIN: 7979 iNaturalist: 53597 IPNI: 1558-1 IRMNG:...

Discussion moved to talk page with a reminder to avoid personalization and WP:FOC. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC) If FA status is going to...

com/content/vol25/issue3/ (867, -1, X, X R/X/L) thejns.org/doi/pdf/10.3171/foc/2008/24/2/e8 (867, 129, X, X R/X/L) www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/6/3 (867...

if possible, it helps us help you quicker. I suggest Haptic-feedback WP:FOC, become more familiar with the relevant policies (especially WP:NOT), and...

links back to dead links here[22]. Sorry but I doubt your neutrality. WP:FOC The edit summary is for the accompanying diff link. Jyoti (talk) 11:23, 6...

May 2011 (UTC) Dipterocarpus basilanicus (history · last edit) from http://foc.bio-mirror.cn/mss/volume13/Dipterocarpaceae.pdf. Nomination completed by...

12 May 2026 (UTC) OK so I think you both need to dial back the PAs and FOC. Can either of you provide some workable diffs for the contested changes...

fnk fnl fnm fnn fno fnp fnq fnr fns fnt fnu fnv fnw fnx fny fnz foa fob foc fod foe fof fog foh foi foj fok fol fom fon foo fop foq for fos fot fou fov...

violates Wikipedia fundamentals such as WP:GOODFAITH, WP:CIVIL, WP:FOC and WP:NPA. The WP:FOC policy says that editors must “comment on content, not the contributor...

Wall (video) Fly on the Wall (album) Fly on the Wall (song) Flynn Gower FOC (album) Foggy Highway Fold (Epicure album) Folk Alliance Australia Follow...

Mon May 12, 2008 - user:Marcusbbyrne - user talk (contribs) on page Re-Foc (diff) -> calculated overlap Marcusbbyrne <-> marcusbyrne.com (U->L: 58.33%...

acknowledge. These editors have made little effort to focus on the content (WP:FOC), WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM, WP:NEGOTIATE, WP:PRESERVE, WP:DONTBITE or find WP:ATD...

Florina Pașcalău Florișoru River Flueraș Focșa River Focșani Foișorul de Foc Folești mine Foltești Forăști Former Ploiești derby Fortress Church, Târgu...

Front F-15EX Eagle II F-16 June 2008 F-16 Solo Display Team Radom 2009 b F.O.C. Darley and Alexander Hay Ritchie - Sherman's March to the Sea Fairchild...

involving considerable time and attention of all other editors. Re-read WP:FOC -- Doctor Crazy in Room 102 of The Mental Asylum 05:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)...

looked at the recent history and left them another warning (this time about FOC/ASPERSIONS) but previous ones for using article talk pages as a forum appear...

impressive... Nomoskedasticity (talk) 14:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC) Please FOC, not the editors Springee (talk) 15:55, 20 September 2022 (UTC) Stay in your...

contribs) 10:37, 24 September 2025 (UTC) I am very calm. Please adhere to WP:FOC. Simonm223 (talk) 10:41, 24 September 2025 (UTC) Keep. Notable and meets...

uncivil comment to derail a consensus-building discussion; basically what WP:FOC hopes to avoid. I used the AN/I diff in Q3 in part because I couldn't find...

_George_Washington_entering_New_York,_1783._Copy_of_print_by_A._H._Ritchie_after_F.O.C._Darley.,_1_-_NARA_-_532881.tif. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:50, 23 March 2019...

(infobox), and "29 March 2016" (table) I wonder if the correlation between FOC-in-C and HAG could be clarified in the note. For instance, which is higher...

others of FOC in a comment that almost exclusively was commenting on other editors yourself. Sergecross73 msg me 14:10, 17 April 2026 (UTC) FOC can be invoked...

vertical deploy F-15EX Eagle II F-16 Fighting Falcons above New York City(2) F.O.C. Darley and Alexander Hay Ritchie - Sherman's March to the Sea FA-18 Automated...

avoid disputes by focusing on article content rather than editor conduct WP:FOC. Recent arbitration committee findings state that The committee also encouraged...

incorrect. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 14:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC) Please review FOC. If you feel the need to identify editors as garden implements, do it on...

during conversations, rather than editor conduct, in accordance with WP:FOC. @Impru20: claimed: "allegations on independent sexual misconduct cases were...

main issue appears to be the photographer itself, and we need to Wikipedia:FOC. EF5 14:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC) I won't go into the merits, and I hope ArionStar...

WP:FOC. — EF5 13:17, 15 August 2025 (UTC) [140]. His previous account, which he lost the login for, was blocked for less than 46 hours. And WP:FOC has...

statements as “utter nonsense,” which isn’t really helpful under WP:CIVIL or WP:FOC. What matters here is verifiability and independence of sourcing, not speculation...

The comments left on their talk page by the OP are disappointing, but WP:FOC forbids me from saying anything further. As a sidenote, I'm interested to...

(talk) 21:24, 25 September 2025 (UTC) We disagree, and your inability to WP:FOC and WP:AGF is disruptive. --Hipal (talk) 21:46, 25 September 2025 (UTC) Strange...

chose not to mention this in the closing statement as that would violate WP:FOC. I believe my close was fair and represented the discussion that took place...

(UTC) I am pretty shocked by these accusations if true, and would ask we WP:FOC. I believe @Horse Eye's Back is a good editor and contributor to these discussions...

regarding Zee News. — EarthDude (Talk) 12:27, 25 March 2026 (UTC) You should WP:FOC. Zalaraz (talk) 13:48, 25 March 2026 (UTC) In what world would the use of...

Let’s remember WP:CIVIL and keep the focus on content and sourcing per WP:FOC. My intent has been to clarify the notability and sourcing issues under WP:GNG...

GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 07:59, 4 December 2025 (UTC) The second diff is an WP:FOC violation. That specific discussion took place back in August. I don't say...

statements as “utter nonsense,” which isn’t really helpful under WP:CIVIL or WP:FOC. What matters here is verifiability and independence of sourcing, not speculation...

(talk) 11:37, 14 December 2025 (UTC) Late reply, but your comment violates WP:FOC. Please be more respectful to other editors, regardless of ongoing disputes...

impact and no WP:SUSTAINED coverage. And while I understand that I should WP:FOC with this, I think it's important to note that the article creator wrote...

editing, or LLM usage are speculative and not substantiated. Per WP:AGF and WP:FOC, deletion discussions must focus on article content and sourcing, not on...

sources? —  HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK 11:45, 21 January 2026 (UTC) A reminder that WP:FOC applies here. 11WB (talk) 15:51, 21 January 2026 (UTC) So instead of answering...

focused on the article, @Zxcvbnm, rather than the conduct of other editors, WP:FOC applies. The articles provided by @DigitalIceAge are fine. If a WP:HEYMAN...

if they don't closet themselves online. It's also a distraction from WP:FOC and is the reason I personally deleted all my userboxes as I was very tired...

conduct requirement for some usergroups, doing so is generally a good idea. WP:FOC and WP:TPG are universal; the former is policy, and they apply to your editing...

increasingly adversarial tone. Per talk guidelines like WP:CIVIL and WP:FOC, I would have preferred that the discussion stay focused on what I actually...

dissenting voices. This framing is not only inaccurate but inflammatory. Per WP:FOC, discussions, especially at ANI, must be centered on conduct and content...

which no one responded to, to get a response is part of it. I recommend WP:FOC. The ping was off-topic but I'll address it because threats are being made[8]...

08:20, 9 April 2026 (UTC) First of all, I suggest you read WP:AGF and WP:FOC. Secondly, what goes on in the Firstpost article is unrelated to this discussion...

issues when acting in a closing or relisting capacity, so as to adhere to WP:FOC and remain impartial. The AfD was three times longer than it needed to be...

page recreation. Regarding whether it was proper to create a redirect WP:FOC says not to focus on the conduct, just the content. Whatever has happened...

diversion to focus on editors instead on the text and sources, where WP:FOC is relevant). They're also apparently impressed by the number of edits, but...

similar circs.) —Fortuna, imperatrix 17:37, 25 February 2026 (UTC) I think WP:FOC would apply here. EF5 17:44, 25 February 2026 (UTC) Indeed, that's not a...

user's dubious edits. --WMrapids (talk) 20:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC) First, WP:FOC. Little has to do my history of reports when in this case we are disccuting...

initial nomination message whilst quite lengthy, did not at all violate WP:FOC. It respectfully focused on content only. I will concede that the sources...

(UTC) Save the personal analysis for your substack. Follow the sources, WP:FOC to improve the article, and leave the incoherent drivel somewhere else. Just10A...

I'm speaking directly to you alone, Slava570, I would say, slow down, WP:FOC and try to avoid getting into interpersonal disputes in CTOPS and I'd leave...

article, particularly those that are WP:PRIMARY. A reminder to follow WP:FOC and not make personal remarks about other editors. Relisting. Please add...

the theory personally. MrOllie (talk) 20:56, 15 April 2026 (UTC) Bingo. WP:FOC is a good idea dealing with such article as well as in Wikipedia discussions...

POV than policy. Simonm223 (talk) 18:23, 16 January 2025 (UTC) Please WP:FOC and keep the discussion on the sources. Iljhgtn (talk) 18:43, 16 January...

I'm close to removing that section with an edit summary pointing to WP:FOC. Augmented Seventh, you tried to include the content twice against objections;...

must strike your unfounded accusations against other editors and read WP:FOC. Orientls (talk) 10:46, 1 December 2025 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NBUILD and...

LightningThrower (talk) 21:29, 2 August 2026 (UTC) @LightningThrower Key advice at WP:FOC. If you do that, you should be fine. Mike Turnbull (talk) 10:49, 3 August...

editing, or LLM usage are speculative and not substantiated. Per WP:AGF and WP:FOC, deletion discussions must focus on article content and sourcing, not on...

my views - but they were often used by editors who ignore WP:NPA and WP:FOC to propagate the absurd position that left-wing people are intrinsically...

User:Bluethricecreamman (Talk·Contribs) 00:15, 24 March 2026 (UTC) Please WP:FOC. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2026 (UTC) So is there anyone besides...

bright-line violation of our WP:NPA and WP:FOC policies. –dlthewave ☎ 12:23, 6 April 2023 (UTC) I wouldn't read WP:FOC that way. Any editor who nominates a...

information, not the formatting of valid arguments. Please adhere to WP:FOC (Focus on Content) and WP:NPA (No Personal Attacks). Dismissing a detailed...

disagree. Feeling personally attacked from your work here is a big issue. (WP:FOC) The goal should always be for the wiki guidelines to prevail. Please note...

creating non-notable articles is not block-worthy. AfD is subject to WP:FOC, so this would need to be discussed at a different venue, if at all. Whilst...

unusual job), is not an indication of notability.' I'm also going to cite WP:FOC here. Comments about whether I performed a BEFORE check (which I did) are...

February 2026 (UTC) Responding to @Relton66. I would normally invoke WP:FOC here, but you do make a legitimate point. I am unsure if action can be taken...

issue. I don't think it's a sanctionable issue but it certainly fails WP:FOC and isn't in compliance with CIVIL. It would have been better to try to address...

@Pokelego999 'trying this before to no avail' is a borderline violation of WP:FOC. PL is a respectable editor and the focus should be on content and not conduct...

pretty lengthy, but I don't think it's fair to say I can't give my opinion... FOC generally prohibits commenting on editor conduct here, but I am concerned...

been disputed. Relisting to allow for further input. A reminder that WP:FOC applies, and not to cast accusations of disruptive editing at other participants...

if they don't closet themselves online. It's also a distraction from WP:FOC and is the reason I personally deleted all my userboxes as I was very tired...

This editor needs to understand that disagreements are fine but they must FOC and maintain CIVIL including not casting aspersions. Springee (talk) 04:01...

my user talk page telling me, it's not for the article's talk page, to WP:FOC, and talk to administrators about it on the appropriate boards. I reiterated...

the discussion on the article itself and should continue to keep Wikipedia:FOC top of mind. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:26, 14 May 2025 (UTC) My apologies for inviting...

[91], which is an Ad Hominem attack that violates the policies WP:PA and WP:FOC. Also problems with WP:CIVIL. I then reminded them not to do this [92], but...

solving. The UCoC and other policies/guidelines/essays (such as WP:NPA, WP:FOC, and others) already prohibit discriminatory behavior. And normal conduct...

like WP:COI when there is “no real evidence” and reminders to follow WP:FOC. Lightbreather recently opened a thread on another editor's user talk page...

summaries and edited responses: here and here. You have been ignoring WP:FOC, and have made the priority of your arguments on the page about me, when...

I've got no problem with your suggested text up to and including the WP:FOC link; maybe add something to the effect of ", not just complain that the...

contribs) 10:37, 24 September 2025 (UTC) I am very calm. Please adhere to WP:FOC. Simonm223 (talk) 10:41, 24 September 2025 (UTC) Keep. Notable and meets...

(like this one). Per Wikipedia:Dispute resolution § Focus on content (WP:FOC), please "Focus on article content during discussions, not on editor conduct"...

under and immediately this article came to mind. Please do keep in mind WP:FOC, though. — EF5 17:57, 23 April 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

correctly pointed out that those issues are a matter for WP:AN/I, as WP:FOC does apply to AfD. The primary issue here revolves around what is considered...

Svarog I K ? — ? 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) Svastica de Foc ? — ? 2 1 2.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) SvB ? — ? 9 1 9.000 Wikipedia...

content (WP:FOC) and content policies, WP:BATTLE mentality. 17:20, 15 May 202518:35, 15 May 2025 WP:IDHT, failure to WP:AGF, failure to FOC, failure to...

on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) 2023 IEEE 64th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) (3 in 1, 2) 3 2 1.500 58 Journal of...

follow WP:DR (both re content and user conduct), and just relentlessly WP:FOC, make honest arguments, and keep patience (WP:AE is the user conduct forum...

(UTC) I just noticed that this whole discussion is a massive violation of WP:FOC. I started this thread because of something completely different. What is...

just can't knock off battleground behavior. If anything, it's just a WP:FOC policy enforcement sanction. Some editors need a bright line that forces...

set out in what you have presented. You have alleged issues with AGF and FOC: could you please share the diffs for those situations? It is likely to get...

not content (cf. WP:NPA Comment on content, not on the contributor. WP:FOC Focus on article content during discussions, not on editor conduct; comment...

Newimpartial (talk) 19:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC) Excellent. It's very simple: WP:FOC. And now Tewdar needs to take the stern talking to on board as well, because...

WP:Dispute resolution; article talk pages are usually for discussing content (WP:FOC), while user talk pages are the places for discussing conduct/behaviour Kowal2701...

than for the express purpose of being a social media instead of actually WP:FOC but you Wikipedians are way too self-fellating to do that properly. ~2026-37997-68...

I’m hoping we can stick to WP: AGE, WP:NPA &keep focus on content, per WP: FOC. Please could that collapse be undone for fairness and transparency Astral...

who gives every impression of being fundamentally unable to comply with WP:FOC and WP:AGF, no matter how many times they are explained to them. Anyone who...

not here to debate culture war topics. Basically, discuss sources and WP:FOC (I know feck all about American history but FWIW scholars do use the term...

discussions, not on editor conduct; comment on content, not the contributor. (WP:FOC). However, I continue to see an incredible amount of focus on my persona...

thread at Talk:Battle of Kartarpur? (Although before you do, please read WP:FOC.) CityOfSilver 18:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC) It's now proven beyond any shadow...

IOHANNVSVERVS lashing out at BilledMammal on the talk page in violation of WP:FOC with accusations of stonewalling, etc. despite BM trying to give some guidance...

shared a single valid URL to justify his WP:FTN war on me? You know - WP:FOC? "But his behavior" is not a valid complaint when editors were allowed to...

issues when acting in a closing or relisting capacity, so as to adhere to WP:FOC and remain impartial. The AfD was three times longer than it needed to be...

case about M.Bitton (specifically see re PIA), it's still a violation of WP:FOC. Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 18:41, 16 April 2026 (UTC) I guess admins can...

The comments left on their talk page by the OP are disappointing, but WP:FOC forbids me from saying anything further. As a sidenote, I'm interested to...

RM's definitely are not, and Sergecross's comments really crossed the WP:FOC policy line there. It does become a casting aspersions/poisoning the well...

discussions on the same subject. Some comments I should not make in violation of FOC but in another attempt at advising the filer: Comment on content, not contributors...

sniping, this time at JzG. October 6, 2023 Continued dismissal of WP:TPNO/WP:FOC, selectively removing talk page sniping, but choosing to let sniping towards...

over the years. Remember to center yourself on the ideas of WP:NOTFORUM/WP:FOC more often on article talk pages. I have seen you give in-depth answers at...

tend to promote further incivility. jps's concerns may be valid but, per wp:FOC they shouldn't be discussing them on the deletion page in question. I don't...

Stop acting so self-pitying I asked them to strike it down and follow WP:FOC - but they ignored it. [3] Since then they have continued to focus on editors...

well against an editor? How does that even help the discussion? Read WP:FOC. So, do you believe you have the right to cast aspersions without accompanying...

help matters at all here, nor should have occurred on that talk page per WP:FOC. If that discussion had appeared on the user's talk page, as should of occurred...

concerning. Again In your answer you accused Ekdalian-Adamantine123 (read WP:FOC). Dympies has not answered my questions uncovering or accepting his mistakes...