Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
between film articles. See also MOS:SECTIONORDER. Shortcuts MOS:FILMLEADMOS:FILMLEAD MOS:FILMLEDEMOS:FILMLEDE MOS:FILMGENREMOS:FILMGENRE MOS:FILMCOUNTRYMOS:FILMCOUNTRY...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film § Lead section – tense in film leads, a.k.a. MOS:FILMLEAD This page is a list of project pages associated with the same title or...
Click to read more »lead. The film is produced by "The film was produced by"? But this WP:FILMLEAD says lead should be in present tense. Charles Turing (talk) 17:27, 29 August...
Click to read more »to start off by refuting one of 23 editor's comments. According to WP:FILMLEAD, "If the nationality is not singular, cover the different national interests...
Click to read more »him on the talk page, tried providing citations of guidelines like WP:FILMLEAD to show this info is valid, tried to go to DRN where I was just told I...
Click to read more »article body. Add something about the Critical Response and Accolades. (MOS:FILMLEAD) Lead already mentions negative critical response, and it hasn't won enough...
Click to read more »viewpoint I presented is that NPOV trumps FILMLEAD, and that if NPOV is violated it doesnt matter if FILMLEAD is met. nableezy - 17:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »arguments are contradictory (sometimes refers to WP:SYNTH, others to WP:FILMLEAD, even for unclear reasons to WP:RS although there are many good sources...
Click to read more »the guidance provided byWikiProject Film in MOS:FILM, specifically WP:FILMLEAD, which appropriately supplements WP:LEAD rather than restricting (or rewriting...
Click to read more »to stop and in the face of both cited sources and guidelines such as WP:FILMLEAD. Their only attempt to engage across the many articles they are editing...
Click to read more »useful edit of his. There are none. All were edits he had done against WP:FILMLEAD or other guidelines. A number of them were also reverted by other editors...
Click to read more »is grounded in how they are categorized by film organizations (see WP:FILMLEAD "At minimum, the opening sentence should identify the following elements:...
Click to read more »are relevant to the subject's notability. But when it comes to movies WP:FILMLEAD states the the nationality should be mentioned if it's singular and defined...
Click to read more »it was worth asking. Your suggestion is good and worth discussing at WP:FILMLEAD, but I'm following the example used in most MCU articles: "Para 1: introduce...
Click to read more »lead or not, in which multiple nationalities is urged against per MOS/WP:FILMLEAD. Current user being disruptive over this has been warned multiple times...
Click to read more »despite the infobox listing multiple (sourced) countries, a violation of WP:FILMLEAD. DonIago (talk) 16:10, 15 September 2022 (UTC) Semi-protected for a period...
Click to read more »to start off by refuting one of 23 editor's comments. According to WP:FILMLEAD, "If the nationality is not singular, cover the different national interests...
Click to read more »have been raised: WP:SEAOFBLUE, which was resolved after these edits; WP:FILMLEAD, which seems to be based on a overly rigid interpretation of that guideline...
Click to read more »it was worth asking. Your suggestion is good and worth discussing at WP:FILMLEAD, but I'm following the example used in most MCU articles: "Para 1: introduce...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:33, 4 December 2025 (UTC) What? This guy was not following MOS:FILMLEAD / MOS:FILMACCOLADES / MOS:NOTLEDE, arguing like follow the guidelines were...
Click to read more »characterize the film in this exact way, and therefore does not comply with MOS:FILMLEAD. His behavior is de-stablising a GA-rated article. The edit is very poor...
Click to read more »animation, and its completely different tone to the rest of the franchise. MOS:FILMLEAD, which is an analogous guideline, clarifies that any summary of the film's...
Click to read more »article body. Add something about the Critical Response and Accolades. (MOS:FILMLEAD) Lead already mentions negative critical response, and it hasn't won enough...
Click to read more »User:Death Editor 2 wants to add the Erwin Rommel page to Category:Nazis who committed suicide, and Category:Holocaust perpetrators. When I asked what...
Click to read more »Unregistered users keep adding WP:SNTH wording into the lead that goes against WP:FILMLEAD/WP:NPOV/WP:FILMAUDIENCE. Mike Allen 20:17, 19 August 2023 (UTC) Semi-protected...
Click to read more »the change is because the franchise ended, even though MOS:TVNOW and MOS:FILMLEAD state that unless it is lost media, it should still be referred to in present...
Click to read more »