This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Notability (geographic features) continue to apply. Shortcuts WP:FAILORGWP:FAILORG WP:FAILCORPWP:FAILCORP Although an organization that fails to meet the...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:ORG and WP:FAILORG. hueman1 (talk) 08:11, 19 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:ORG and WP:FAILORG. hueman1 (talk) 08:14, 19 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:ORG and WP:FAILORG. hueman1 (talk) 08:07, 19 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:ORG and WP:FAILORG. hueman1 (talk) 08:08, 19 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:ORG and WP:FAILORG. hueman1 (talk) 08:12, 19 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:ORG and WP:FAILORG. hueman1 (talk) 08:08, 19 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:ORG and WP:FAILORG. hueman1 (talk) 08:04, 19 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »share your views. Edwige9 (talk) 10:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC) See WP:FAILORG for ways of preserving information of a non-notable organization without...
Click to read more »verifiable, and appears to have a reasonably reliable source, so it meets WP:FAILORG. I'd be happy to hear any arguments against redirects for primary schools...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:ORG and WP:FAILORG. hueman1 (talk) 08:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »WP:SPIP and with no secondary sources, it is a cut and dry case of WP:FAILORG Let'srun (talk) 02:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »thought it might possibly be a candidate for some kind of merging per WP:FAILORG; that, however, would only make sense if the main article about the parent...
Click to read more »the notability clause, the article seems to be still covered under WP:FAILORG and WP:NONPROFIT. A better use of space and time would be improving the...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:ORG and WP:FAILORG. hueman1 (talk) 08:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »13:24, 6 February 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:SIGCOV & WP:NCORP and is a WP:FAILORG and purely WP:PROMO. Dey subrata (talk) 14:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC) Comment...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:ORG and WP:FAILORG. hueman1 (talk) 08:12, 19 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:ORG and WP:FAILORG. hueman1 (talk) 08:14, 19 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »the notability clause, the article seems to be still covered under WP:FAILORG and WP:NONPROFIT. A better use of space and time would be improving the...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:ORG and WP:FAILORG. hueman1 (talk) 08:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »verifiable, and appears to have a reasonably reliable source, so it meets WP:FAILORG. I'd be happy to hear any arguments against redirects for primary schools...
Click to read more »share your views. Edwige9 (talk) 10:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC) See WP:FAILORG for ways of preserving information of a non-notable organization without...
Click to read more »13:24, 6 February 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:SIGCOV & WP:NCORP and is a WP:FAILORG and purely WP:PROMO. Dey subrata (talk) 14:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC) Comment...
Click to read more »WP:SIRS sources we need. However, on Wegner's book alone, I think we, per WP:FAILORG, have sufficient information that there should be mention of the camp on...
Click to read more »WP:SPIP and with no secondary sources, it is a cut and dry case of WP:FAILORG Let'srun (talk) 02:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »thought it might possibly be a candidate for some kind of merging per WP:FAILORG; that, however, would only make sense if the main article about the parent...
Click to read more »WP:SIRS sources we need. However, on Wegner's book alone, I think we, per WP:FAILORG, have sufficient information that there should be mention of the camp on...
Click to read more »