This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
at the reader, other than with navigational hatnotes). More subtly, editorializing can produce implications that are not supported by the sources. When...
Click to read more »same style of writing is editorializing, regardless of whether it is about a fact or an opinion. The temptation to editorialize is strongest when the facts...
Click to read more »useful to the reader when added inexpertly, or in the context of dubious editorializing. There is a de facto tradition of keeping such material around for easy...
Click to read more »⇒[attribution needed] {{editorializing}} – inline template for Wikipedia:Manual of Style (words to watch)#Editorializing ⇒[editorializing] {{editorialising}}...
Click to read more »get rejected socially. Editorializing sounds like "Society should be more supportive of people with epilepsy". Editorializing does not sound like "Social...
Click to read more »Was FILLED with POV and unwarranted editorializing. I've tried to clean it up. I'd love a second opinion. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 01:48, Dec 16, 2004...
Click to read more »switchover." -- I don't know if it's just me, but I would prefer less editorializing and more pure reporting on such divisive issues, since perceived existing...
Click to read more »article is horrendously non-neutral, quoting from records and then editorializing (for example: "Comment: Kinda cuts to the heart of the credibility question...
Click to read more »unreferenced speculations, editorializing, insertion of unverified allegations, allegations refuted, speculative editorializing about why (largely Mr King's)...
Click to read more »longer than the actual article, in fact—about whether it was improper editorializing to use the term 'drug abuse'". Noting that the discussants were "passionate...
Click to read more »written. Originating editor warned blocked for abusing Wikipedia for editorializing. Acroterion (talk) 00:13, 18 May 2016 (UTC) Donald Trump's Mar-A-Lago...
Click to read more »discussion][spelling?][whose translation?][buzzword][compared to?][editorializing][fact or opinion?][opinion][peacock prose][neutrality is disputed][promotion...
Click to read more »sourcing here. Hog Farm Talk 01:07, 19 August 2021 (UTC) Move to FARC - editorializing issues, and it looks like from the interior notes that it's likely that...
Click to read more »after all, and is not an encyclopedia itself, and so allows many things—editorializing, narrative, original research—that would be unacceptable in Wikipedia...
Click to read more »after all, and is not an encyclopedia itself, and so allows many things—editorializing, narrative, original research—that would be blasphemy in the article...
Click to read more »of articles to remove PoV (nationalism, prescriptivism), unencyclopedic editorializing, and instruction. Participant since 12:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »working on content that will improve the Wikipedia. This is just the user editorializing on some issue. NW (Talk) (How am I doing?) 02:45, 14 May 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »independent commendation of its website, the prominence given to its editorializing in an independent journal, [5]. And what of the two works quoted in...
Click to read more »appeared to be in-depth game guide/instruction manual material and editorializing on the nature of the gameplay. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:03, 5 October...
Click to read more »Likewise, words such as "Interestingly," "Actually," etc, are a form of editorializing, and should be avoided. "Interesting" to whom? "Actually," compared...
Click to read more »massive block that sprung Marshall Faulk for a touchdown in 2003" are editorializing at best and POV at worst. --Flex (talk|contribs) 19:46, 5 March 2007...
Click to read more »so far. 1a Article is full of praiseworthy comments, weasel wording, editorializing and bullet lists that should be in prose. Here are some examples: Sylvia...
Click to read more »promote PRO/CON propaganda or advocacy of any kind?... N/A, Yes, No Editorializing of any kind. Advocacy of any kind. Judgement of any kind. (SQG#2)Are...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Apparent neologism, or just editorializing via OR. Two Google hits, neither relevant. Acroterion (talk) 02:12,...
Click to read more »usual disjointed, up-and-down reading level articles. It has enough editorializing ("historical" etc) that it didn't come strictly from case summaries...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Don't build the Frankenstein Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch § Editorializing Wikipedia:Signs of AI writing {{promotional}} – cleanup request tag...
Click to read more »deemed a suicide by authorities. It appears like there may be some editorializing beyond what sources actually say, although I am not an expert on this...
Click to read more »down without having to delete the entire article. And at the risk of editorializing, I would like to commend everyone that participated in this vigorous...
Click to read more »peek at Google Books [1] further confirms notability. At the risk of editorializing, I found the nomination to be very unusual - I believe that spending...
Click to read more »editor has a narrow project view. NPOV applies to content and as well as editorializing. We must get along politely to have the !votes to achieve powerful respect...
Click to read more »interest (classical music). It had some writing and MOS issues, some editorializing (a common problem in clasical music articles) and I noticed that the...
Click to read more »that "excellent illustration of the scientific method" might be a bit editorializing. Opabinia regalis 02:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC) Thanks very much, Opabinia...
Click to read more »ethnic slur against Albanians. A reformatted version of this, minus the editorializing, might make a suitable Wiktionary entry. Since no sources are given...
Click to read more »informal tone due to editorializing". If that is true, this is a style issue, not a bias one. To make the point clear, the word "editorializing" is linked to...
Click to read more »some) as being too much like an opinion piece. ("an absurd piece of editorializing rhetoric" huffed one editor...) so for you to say that unattributed...
Click to read more »volunteer effort in writing for The Signpost, I think the amount of editorialization in this column is becoming worrisome. Present the traffic report. Congratulations...
Click to read more »Likewise, words such as "Interestingly," "Actually," etc, are a form of editorializing, and should be avoided. "Interesting" to whom? "Actually," compared...
Click to read more »related to entire sequences of newsworthy events. Parts of this may be editorializing about the Alan Matheney case, but the underlying institution seems to...
Click to read more »of these are sourced. The notes are also so clearly tainted with WP:Editorializing that they would need revision even if there were citations. I am choosing...
Click to read more »Likewise, words such as "Interestingly," "Actually," etc, are a form of editorializing, and should be avoided. "Interesting" to whom? "Actually," compared...
Click to read more »be impartial and to present facts without commentary, analysis, and editorializing. There are plenty of places for opinions in Interworld and the real...
Click to read more »massive block that sprung Marshall Faulk for a touchdown in 2003" are editorializing at best and POV at worst. --Flex (talk|contribs) 19:46, 5 March 2007...
Click to read more »3 Mar 2005 (UTC) Delete -- the final graf is just an invitation to editorializing. The grafs prior to that are unept summaries of behavioral economics...
Click to read more »same problems that I am addressing today: "OR, POV, unsourced claims, editorializing, etc." However, the bulk of the article was written roughly ten years...
Click to read more »Likewise, words such as "Interestingly," "Actually," etc, are a form of editorializing, and should be avoided. "Interesting" to whom? "Actually," compared...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Comment. Lead too short, not referenced, and some strange editorializing throughout the prose: "Thus modern, and probably medieval, ideas of...
Click to read more »believe it. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC) Delete - editorializing. B.Wind 04:32, 18 December 2005 (UTC) Redirect to War on Drugs. Capitalistroadster...
Click to read more »original research and plot summary, laced throughout with opinions and editorializing, and what little is actually sourced does not establish notability because...
Click to read more »will edit the article, as it's a little on the POV side, with some editorializing going on. freshacconci (✉) 15:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC) Keep meets WP:BKCRIT...
Click to read more »sentence was inserted in 2016 in this odd edit (odd because of the editorializing, such as "he must have liked Perlemuter's playing because...") by a...
Click to read more »incivility, the damage caused by editors misquoting, plagiarizing and editorializing destroys the credibility of our encyclopedia. Increased transparency...
Click to read more »written. Originating editor warned blocked for abusing Wikipedia for editorializing. Acroterion (talk) 00:13, 18 May 2016 (UTC) Donald Trump's Mar-A-Lago...
Click to read more »Likewise, words such as "Interestingly," "Actually," etc, are a form of editorializing, and should be avoided. "Interesting" to whom? "Actually," compared...
Click to read more »Bartlett (talk) 20:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC) Delete. inadequately sourced editorializing. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:48, 16 October 2017 (UTC). Delete The topic is...
Click to read more »MOS:CLAIM), weasel and doubtful words (MOS:WEASEL and MOS:ALLEGED), editorializing (MOS:EDITORIAL), euphemisms (MOS:EUPHEMISM), clichés (MOS:CLICHE) and...
Click to read more »of style. Puffery, Unsupported attributions, Contentious labels, and Editorializing pervade the entire work, both critiquing and lauding the subject. I've...
Click to read more »(talk | contribs) 09:14, 8 April 2010 (UTC) Delete, original research, editorializing, and just not an encyclopedia article. Suggest moving to user space:...
Click to read more »editorializing? --Guy Macon (talk) 16:24, 26 December 2018 (UTC) I suppose we could do that, but I'm curious about what you consider editorializing at...
Click to read more »Star Wars character. 68.83.86.147 Don't replace articles with your own editorializing comments while they are on VfD...or ever, for that matter. — Gwalla...
Click to read more »17 January 2025 (UTC) Then feel free to answer the questions without editorializing, if you can; your time will be spent far more productively, I assure...
Click to read more »indistinguishable ("revert same editorializing that lacks consensus and contradicts cited sources, again", "same old disputed editorializing, it does not have "consensus"...
Click to read more »Rider (talk) What's going on? ...The main conflicts are issues of POV; editorializing. It is most easily demonstrated in the insistence of some on the term...
Click to read more »gas will fall under criticism, too, with the green part debunked (my editorializing). Rhadow (talk) 14:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC) Rhadow - this is green...
Click to read more »there is very little here other than a collection of links with brief editorializing. The links themselves might be worth merging somewhere. If an article...
Click to read more »up of the author's personal opinion, with multiple instances of WP:editorializing and unsourced conclusions. Strong WP:POV and WP:OR concerns. -Zanhe...
Click to read more »some puffery (i.e. "single-handedly" in Interim Developments) and editorialization (i.e. "really" in "continues to believe that he shot down a spy plane...
Click to read more »however that excised material was unreferenced original research and editorializing. In 2013 I recommended the article be merged or redirected back to Light...
Click to read more »interpretation of public records an a self audit conducted by LVCVA. This is editorializing and not a true unbiased representation of facts. Adexpertinlv (talk)...
Click to read more »nevertheless; adding that in there makes it sound like you're more editorializing than anything. I recommend substituting that for other words. Watch...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) I see a few instances of undue weight or an unnecessarily editorializing tone in the article and wanted to check with others if my view makes...
Click to read more »Delete. No encyclopedic information, it's all the author's opinions and editorializing. There's nothing here that can be referenced or cited for inclusion...
Click to read more »cider-sippin' fun-for-everyone Arts Festival!" is a direct quotation, not editorializing. -- Eastmain (talk) 22:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Fair enough, I stand...
Click to read more »content these accounts are adding has problems like WP:Synthesis, WP:Editorializing, and so on. Requesting CU for stronger confirmation and to turn up sleepers...
Click to read more »Background "had finally had some influence": "finally" is bordering on editorializing. Fixed "match the success of the hit 'Hush'": suggest "their hit 'Hush'"...
Click to read more »about female-on-male forced seduction. He engaged in WP:Synthesis/WP:Editorializing. The article is about "a theme found frequently in romance novels and...
Click to read more »delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:32, 11 June 2017 (UTC) Template:Cleanup-editorializing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Unused. Jc86035 (talk)...
Click to read more »article in New York Magazine, while small, does include legitimate editorializing from a legitimate source. Delete per the nomination it does not meet...
Click to read more »Collection. The article definitely needs major cleanup as well as removal of editorializing and possible copyright infringement posed by the mp3 file. I will get...
Click to read more »hardly editorializing. Those concern the accuracy of scientific claim. Claiming the Earth is a cube is obviously incorrect. That's not editorializing. "It...
Click to read more »this is woefully unsuited to mainspace. It is undersourced, full of editorializing (This article presents the recent history of companies that promoted...
Click to read more »different Wikipedia links. Additionally, the references are used to editorialize. One reference to a 1985 vote is "To learn more, see: US support for...
Click to read more »is a worthy entry, but should be rewritten with more facts and less editorializing. 89.1.107.148 (talk · contribs). To which I add: skirts A7 with a single...
Click to read more »to featured status, now that the topic is relatively dormant. Not to editorialize, but I doubt Mr. Cosby will be endorsing much in the next little while...
Click to read more »will need a pretty heavy rewrite, as it slips from quotes to unsourced editorializing in multiple spots, making it hard to tell what is sourced and what is...
Click to read more »who is saying this, and it seems like the writer of the article is editorializing. It's quite possible that this is a quote, but it should be clear to...
Click to read more »independent commendation of its website, the prominence given to its editorializing in an independent journal, [5]. And what of the two works quoted in...
Click to read more »so verifiability is pretty doubtful. Not suitable for WP:BLAR as the editorializing title is not a reasonable redirect. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 11:58...
Click to read more »This is a good list. Obviously the article needs to have much less editorializing, including removing whatever waterfalls are "most important". As to...
Click to read more »integrate it into the article, if its trivial then remove it. Watch out for editorializing, like "beach hosts one of the world's most spectacular New Year's Eve...
Click to read more »Keep Added some sources, deleted unsourced problem paragraphs with editorializing written in machine-translated English, updated information including...
Click to read more »is no longer a featured article This article contains weasel words, editorializing, facts known to be erroneous, and facts without references. Further...
Click to read more »Substantial portions of the content seem to be running afoul of WP:EDITORIALIZING." \\\Septrillion:- ~~~~10Eleventeen 09:01, 8 July 2018 (UTC) Speedy...
Click to read more »"natural habitat" - editorializing, euphemism – For the nth time, PLEASE look up euphemism so you can learn what it means. And editorializing too while you're...
Click to read more »matter to the article's talk page to argue against CathyR 2015's WP:Editorializing and POV-pushing. I noted that if CathyR 2015 is Jessica .D. Smith, she...
Click to read more »self-referenced, ie from the company's website. It should be edited for editorializing and advertising tone after merger. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 19:20, 14...
Click to read more »don't meet WP:BIO, promotional links that constitute WP:LINKSPAM and editorializing that runs counter to WP:NPOV. Also, the sourcing for the concept in...
Click to read more »by Helen Nearing..." Is that a fair statement, or is it some subtle editorializing by a Wikipedia editor. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 10:52...
Click to read more »Hamilton's explanation with authority and dismisses the source. This is editorializing. Racing results: overlinked. In summary it seems to me that the article...
Click to read more »First off, please don't edit my or others' comments by inserting your editorializing in the midst of them to subvert their meaning. I have removed your inserted...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Whilst it may be sourced this looks like editorializing. As well as a veiled attack page on WikiProject Firearms. Blatant soapboxing...
Click to read more »much all reverted as they removed tags and added unsourced content and editorializing. Shortly thereafter the sock account, with its interestingly snarky...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:09, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Strong Keep The collection is without any editorializing and is a completely neutral. It simply creates a selective history of...
Click to read more »Regarding the proposal, the parenthetical part of the first quoted point is editorializing on its author's part, and could have been left out without affecting...
Click to read more »path for women into another male-dominated occupation" is egregious editorializing. She is a female truck driver. Being the first female truck driver at...
Click to read more »themselves valid rationales for deletion, but this article is 100% POV editorializing, and even if it was an encyclopedic topic it would need to be blown...
Click to read more »entirely missing. Further, while prose quality is not my forte, I detect editorializing (ex. "Particularly notable is the "duel of the songs" between Strasser...
Click to read more »seems to have no other purpose than to provide a pretext for a bit of editorializing. --BM 17:27, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete. Self-evident definition of the...
Click to read more »filled with weasle words and what appears to be original research, editorializing, and opinion. There are several cite needed tags, and a good deal of...
Click to read more »can be adequately covered in National Hockey League without all this editorializing. TheBLPGuy 21:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Strong Keep The 1967 expansion...
Click to read more »of athletes killed are both given in an objective form without any editorializing. Interlingua talk 03:07, 18 June 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »WP:FRINGE topic. Further, the article is overly promotional and uses editorializing language to puff-up what little independent significance the film has...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Delete - I trimmed out much of the promotional content and editorializing nonetheless, the author lacks significant notability and the page was...
Click to read more »the URL though, so maybe it isn't a good idea. – Yeah, I try to avoid editorializing titles whenever possible. Really there was only one instance where the...
Click to read more »the article. So, again I must ask, if you were to take away the OR/editorializing/personal-opinion from the article, how much of the article would be...
Click to read more »about the state of the article and potentially harmful effects of its editorializing. However, while keep voters failed to do more than assert that coverage...
Click to read more »opinion’, ‘most feel’, ‘experts declare’, ‘it is often reported’) , editorializing terms (‘without a doubt’, ‘of course’, ‘essentially’)." Steven J. Jankowski:...
Click to read more »establishes that the term does exist, but not much else), inappropriate editorializing and value judgements, and inherently unsourcable statements. Wikipedia...
Click to read more »some cleanup/rewriting since this nomination (removing POV, removing editorialized comments, removing copyright violating quotes, adding sources and formatting)...
Click to read more »went bust in October 2000. Did you remove this because it seemed like editorializing, because it didn't interest you, or for some other reason? As I compare...
Click to read more »sapiens←Talk 04:43, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC) Keep seems notable precisely for his editorializing. Wikipedia is NPOV, but that doesn't mean the people we write about...
Click to read more »heavily involved in WP:NOR and WP:SYNTH violations and choked with editorializing, and it always has been. It's chock full of the editor/s assertions...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) Stubbed - but there's hardly anything there without the editorializing. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 20:42, 18 May 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »_and_navigational_templates says lists and categories are complementary. There is no editorializing or POV so WP:Soapbox doesn't apply. It's just a list and it's not named...
Click to read more »Wartenberg (talk) 03:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC) Delete No google hits, editorialized article, irrelevant person BrigadierG (talk) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »avoid short paragraphs and sections, especially one-liners. Avoid editorializing, like "Controversy abounds..." and "...cheesesteak, surprisingly, is...
Click to read more »volumes from which you can derive your own "elaboration". While I don't editorialize to fit any particular agenda, I have no problem deploying sound editorial...
Click to read more »merged into that, but probably without the text in this article, the editorializing of which looks suspiciously like copyvio and/or original research. Has...
Click to read more »almost entirely made up of unaltered source texts with a bit of personal editorializing mixed in. The substantive issues belong in Bill Clinton. The rest of...
Click to read more »number of medals won or other gimmicky marketing ploys, or otherwise editorializing and first-name cozy language. Sources somewhat exceed smalltown local...
Click to read more »you are looking for reasons not to, you can find them. *Disclaimer-Editorializing- Our system is messed up with rules so strongly favoring the establishment...
Click to read more »prevent a massive waste of time. Half of this article is unencyclopaedic editorialization and exhortation based upon recent events in the U.S., and the other...
Click to read more »Not only is nothing cited in his article, but there is far too much editorializing - eg. an "awesome man of faith". Should either be deleted or sources...
Click to read more »"Extraordinary times produced some extraordinary individuals." - uh, editorializing much? Removed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 18:51, 19 November 2015 (UTC) "While...
Click to read more »easily sourceable. --Dhartung | Talk 22:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Keep No editorializing here. Just a plain old Keep ShoesssS Talk 13:38, 13 July 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »because why are the Arabs laying siege? Fortunately for Hormuzan This is editorializing/POV. Don't sympathize with Hormuzan. Conclusion This is a nice little...
Click to read more »a (the building's) window in the building (Owings, 5). Curiously is editorializing, which shouldn't be in an encyclopedia. Commas seem missing. There is...
Click to read more »wording, attempts at humor or cleverness, reliance on primary sources, editorializing, recentism, pull quotes, journalese, and headlinese. Popcornfud (talk)...
Click to read more »the sentence says that you unfortunately did not pass RFA, which is editorializing the RFA. (Also, you didn't just once disagree with me, you also hounded...
Click to read more »notability for this apparel brand. It's blatantly promotional and full of editorialization/puffery. The one source I found seems to be from a company that brands...
Click to read more »PiusImpavidus (talk) 16:03, 31 October 2022 (UTC) This is not the forum for editorializing. The place for that is the rest of the internet. Please respect the...
Click to read more »Three SPAs all making the same addition of a paragraph of unsourced editorialization to space complexity. Diffs: 26 edits by Ztchou, 17 edits by AngelLienDog...
Click to read more »of evidence page, as Petri Krohn has, is acceptable -- this kind of editorializing personal attack on another user is totally unacceptable. --Haemo 00:21...
Click to read more »unformatted references and footnotes (see WP:CITE/ES). Completely uncited editorializing; example: Arkansans have always been sensitive about being portrayed...
Click to read more »the article as anything other than a fringe element. It is almost all editorializing, speculation and synthesis at best, and OR at that. WP:TNT. JesseRafe...
Click to read more »Age of Makto and Churrup - both have restored the text using similar editorializing edit summaries, and both have no edits outside that page. Bowler the...
Click to read more »her values to those of Aristotle", is another example of pushing the editorializing a bit too far (read page 48 of that book to get a sense). The book is...
Click to read more »here, but AfD discussions are not an appropriate forum for political editorializing. Thanks. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Delete It doesn't help that the article is full of speculation and editorializing Vartanza (talk) 03:04, 7 September 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »connect the dots ____ I stick to objective narrative and avoid judging or editorializing (“Unfortunately” /“It was horrible…”) ____ I stick to what I can prove...
Click to read more »sourced to the film itself. WP:OR would be in unsourced interpretation or editorializing of such actions. I'll be glad to source and return, as its removal has...
Click to read more »mich an 06:37, 22 October 2006 (UTC) Delete as original research and editorializing. Tony Fox (arf!) 06:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC) Delete. Original research...
Click to read more »suggest that The Signpost drastically increase its opinion content and editorialization while abandoning pretenses of "neutrality" and "objectivity". This...
Click to read more »If the matter is still subject to significant doubt, say so. Avoid editorializing, chatting, and commenting on other editors. The temptation to chat can...
Click to read more »The term is clearly notable. I've removed some of the OR phrasing and editorializing. It could use a bit more + expansion, but that's no reason to take the...
Click to read more »video as a source of her being in the music videos. Then the article is editorializing a bit about her films citing a film review... − − Lastly, − − Presumed"...
Click to read more »adheres to. Oh, I forgot ... some version of leadership here has made editorializing the new trend. They call it journalism. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:43, 8...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:EditorialsWikipedia:Editorials to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Editorializing, which is where Wikipedia:EditorialWikipedia:Editorial goes. — Godsy (TALKCONT)...
Click to read more »Auto-generated every hour. Editor interaction utility Ongoing POV pushing and editorializing on Paul Tonko page going as far back as December 2010. All above IPs...
Click to read more »more specific contexts. There is some legitimate content here amid the editorializing — but it belongs in other articles rather than at this title. Bearcat...
Click to read more »noted for negative reception" (which would be more encyclopedic without editorializing), but that wouldn't resolve the issue of how selective the page is....
Click to read more »David and Goliath." This should point removed in an effort to minimize editorializing or rephrased as an adjectival point of fact "However, these had not...
Click to read more »there was never any argument that McDonald was "defending her friends". Editorializing all over the place—adding sarcastic commentary, speculating about people's...
Click to read more »1613/jair.1.11074 |doi-access=free|doi-broken-date=20 July 2025 }}</ref> Editorializing and unreferenced praising, eg "The company's ChatGPT interface has democratized...
Click to read more »wafer-think claims to notability are unsourced, despite the article's WP:Editorializing and doing its best to puff the subject.GirthSummit (blether) 18:20,...
Click to read more »the article with verify if you want, and there could be a bit less editorializing in the text, but this does not at all appear to fall under WP:NN. Capmango...
Click to read more »community." I do think the phrase 'remarkable admission' shades into editorializing. It wasn't an admission: it's our considered strategy. As I explained...
Click to read more »allegations. These really don’t have an encyclopedic tone and sound like editorializing. On the same lines, the lead says the game was criticized (initially)...
Click to read more »19:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC) This article is not neutral; it frequently editorializing about Pedro II's character and describes him in exclusively positive...
Click to read more »Ramah Chapter has learned to fight for its rights" comes across as editorializing. If footnote 1 stays, perhaps add a year to Ramah Navajo School Board...
Click to read more »source about him I could find anywhere on the internet was a Daily Mail editorialized OP-ed about how the Metaverse could be "the end of the world". BrigadierG...
Click to read more »Adult Swim's Toonami block starting from July 27, 2013" - eventually is editorializing, and the tense is wrong "The first DVD and Blu-ray Disc volumes[...]concluded...
Click to read more »last year, and the sports anchor on Ten's Sports Tonight made a lot of editorializing which lampooned the visiting international teams - judging by the bits...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) I was unaware that it was the policy of the Signpost to be editorializing and inserting the personal point of view and opinions of the authors...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Keep and improve, particularly the unsourced material and editorializing. If absolutely necessary, merge with Nudidy or transwiki it. Content...
Click to read more »Nosebagbear (talk) 22:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC) I could do with less editorializing in the questions by The Signpost. The claim "Thus the WMF wants to promote...
Click to read more »page when " well referenced the actual things he did in office without editorializing" were added to his biography . Mr Nyttend's suggestion "things he actually...
Click to read more »what to do when writing articles here (and sometimes why), without editorializing on propriety or legitimacy. We always keep our broad readership in mind...
Click to read more »that redirect currently exists, and is misleading and unverifiable. It editorializes about Fox News, and there is no evidence anyone calls it that. Googling...
Click to read more »"positive nationalism", and the two newspaper citations use this phrase to editorialize. I am not sure "positive nationalism" names a known political philosophy...
Click to read more »issue, the article has an uncited "Conclusion" section, which appears to editorialize the whole article. Wikipedia cannot and must not do this. A "Conclusions"...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable academic whose article seems to have been editorialized pretty extensively over a number of years by an SPA who seems to care...
Click to read more »promotional websites. Editorializing like "to no surprise" or "ironically" should be avoided Y Scanned the article for editorializing/weasel words, and changed...
Click to read more »2013–14 Israeli–Palestinian peace talks. That Clintonbear's clumsy editorializing and POV pushing triggered a conflict that ended up here is not surprising...
Click to read more »site. We probably won't use this site as a reliable source. I could editorialize further, but suffice to say the subject of the article is not notable...
Click to read more »thinks is blatant editorializing. He has not been able to come up with a single remark that I made which is blatant editorializing. I claim that I have...
Click to read more »the most powerful force in popular culture. Nowhere on this page am I editorializing that I am the greatest game designer who ever lived, nor making any...
Click to read more »just feeding the WP:SPA. Closing administrator, please don't let my editorializing get in the way of an expeditious outcome. --BDD (talk) 18:33, 9 August...
Click to read more »likewise, it cannot be ignored." -- "cannot be ignored" is a bit of editorializing that should be attributed to a specific author. "Chandogya Upanishad...
Click to read more »hits for "Ajit Someshwar" and some of them are mirror-sites. The page editorializes on the Indian diaspora and proclaims that the said gentleman is writing...
Click to read more »information, while opining on some 8th grade fight in the lunch room or editorializing about some alleged, college experimentation, ruining the article, and...
Click to read more »generated by Rfd. However targeting it to a theorized cause is unwarranted editorializing, and the source used to make the connection doesn't really say that...
Click to read more »psychiatrist and neurologist) in the article lead is inappropriate. It is also editorializing in the lead of an article about a living person. Problem B) (in short)...
Click to read more »more like nonsense). Ifnord 18:25, 30 November 2005 (UTC) Delete. Editorializes (POV?) and isn't linked anywhere. --StuffOfInterest 18:35, 30 November...
Click to read more »I imagine that it has annually been the occasion of quite a bit of editorializing. I'd also perhaps be more specific on the slogans of the counter-demonstrators...
Click to read more »certain ProfXY will show up in a few hours to revert it back to his editorializing. He has already demonstrated that he is not particularly honest (see...
Click to read more »Present opinions and conflicting findings in a disinterested tone. Do not editorialize. When editorial bias towards one particular point of view can be detected...
Click to read more »trying to read the newly added contents, the wording seems to be a bit editorialized and strong. That's fine but only when the source supports it, so that's...
Click to read more »Stone's edits amount to original research and characterize them as "editorializing." Trey Stone, on his part, views his additions as adding perspective...
Click to read more »later. Zetawoof(ζ) 05:57, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Speedy Delete. This editorialized stub is pure original research. Majoreditor (talk) 21:27, 10 January...
Click to read more »January 2006 (UTC) A map? A picture of food aid convoys? No need to editorialize, of course. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 06:49, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Yap, you...
Click to read more »what or whom should be spelled out, right there. "Eager" sounds like editorializing. addressedIstvan 06:00, 9 October 2006 (UTC) "This crowd swelled as...
Click to read more »disputed (like the order in which Piankh and Herihor held power) and editorializes at some points ("Religion, the arts, and architecture were restored...
Click to read more »per Sunmist. This is a needless content fork with not insignificant editorializing with its decision to include certain events. Axem Titanium (talk) 16:28...
Click to read more »comment added by 73.219.65.60 (talk) 22:44, 24 April 2017 (UTC) It's editorializing, which is not how Wikipedia works. And then there's the edit warring...
Click to read more »Suggestions on what sections to split off. See narrative further above. Editorializing: We're wondering what if anything should be done, that there seem to...
Click to read more »last paragraph blatantly violates Wikipedia:Neutral point of view by editorializing). Userfying would allow the article creator to try to bring the page...
Click to read more »make assertions we don't like is just as much a lapse from policy as editorializing and inserting one's POV into articles. This nomination doesn't explicitly...
Click to read more »tried my best to clean up the page as it existed (which was filled with editorialized details and non-NPOV). That said, given Wikipedia guidelines, there's...
Click to read more »championship-winning a cappella group, has a bad, largely unsourced, editorialized article. A dedicated group of people interested in the subject of a...
Click to read more »volumes, and that plot can be reviewed for accuracy and scrubbed for any editorializing / synthesis. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:09, 15 January 2020 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »attempts at humor or cleverness, over-reliance on primary sources, editorializing, recentism, pull quotes, journalese, and headlinese. Similarly, avoid...
Click to read more »years. Since Curry didn't explain his usage, though, I chose not to editorialize an interpretation directly into the article. --Michael Snow 06:33, 7...
Click to read more »Journalists view non-neutral words and unattributed statements of opinion as "editorializing" or failures of objectivity (News style). This Wikipedian guideline...
Click to read more »whether to include the author's full first name, or simply the initials. Editorializing such as "Book that documents the concept of and recipients of Rosenwald...
Click to read more »not seem to feel that they have any responsibility to verify their editorializing which in this case, after 2 months, is more bullying than scholarly...
Click to read more »discussed at the articles in chief, and that the list should limit its editorializing to criteria for inclusion. Smerdis of Tlön 18:10, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(talk) 04:57, 30 January 2026 (UTC) I fail to see how Trump's ignorant editorializing about past presidents serves any encyclopedic purpose. ←Baseball Bugs...
Click to read more »something "controversial" is editorializing, something you should avoid. Actually, the entire first paragraph is full of editorializing. See below for what I'd...
Click to read more »being especially notable are the result of the editor engaging in POV editorializing. i.e.: "In the early and mid nineties, the rivalry was considered among...
Click to read more »of the article has nothing to do with the sources and appears to be editorializing. LifeCourse (Howe and Strauss) is a marketing consultancy; while their...
Click to read more »story... Carrite (talk) 01:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC) Taking the liberty to editorialize a bit outside of the interview, I agree that there's more room for agreement...
Click to read more »numerous Wikipedia policies and guidelines on content, language usage, editorializing, and BLP issues. These policies and guidelines take precedence over...
Click to read more »first sentence of each paragraph might be on the borderline in terms of editorializing, but for me it works and I wouldn't advise a change, though others might...
Click to read more »April 2022 (UTC) Merge to Political history of Pakistan. "Crisis" is editorializing. And there is no need for a stand-alone article. User:力 (powera, π,...
Click to read more »{{Duplication span}} {{EBD POV}} {{Edition needed}} {{Editorialising}} {{Editorializing}} {{Empty section}} {{Episode needed}} {{Essay}} {{Essay-like}} {{Example...
Click to read more »straight from the national archives database, and is a typical POV editorialized caption of the time, I will reword it. Bleh999 12:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »although I acknowledge Vietnam as some editors' lived experience. My editorializing aside, the consensus here appears split, however when you look at the...
Click to read more »Strong keep - Easilly meets V, NPOV, NOR, N, NSPORTS. I don't like to editorialize at AfD, but Overton is one of the greatest college middle-distance runners...
Click to read more »debated and consensus eventually landed "editorializing". Parroting authoritarian propaganda is editorializing, not not doing so. 1brianm7 (talk) 12:53...
Click to read more »but treating it as one on Wikipedia would be original research or POV editorializing. While there could conceivably be a "Soundtrack of Crazy Bus" article...
Click to read more »article consists of unsourced original research and more than a little editorializing. What if we stub it down to the plot and characters? I honestly don't...
Click to read more »sources link to her own pages) as well as severely toning down the editorializing ("In the tradition of Paul Krassner, she sometimes combines legitimate...
Click to read more »for the article to replace material which he deemed "inaccurate" and "editorializing" in his testimony. An email from NCAA Web Director Ronnie Ramos proposed...
Click to read more »hole or crevice. *"Although this is true,..." - this is editorializing - see WP:EDITORIALIZING Taxonomy and etymology Move link to Tachycineta to previous...
Click to read more »different argument. Nomoskedasticity continues to apply The Guardian's editorializing to Gavin Schmidt when Schmidt is directly quoted on the source and does...
Click to read more »LLM use, particularly the ones -- e.g., undue emphasis on symbolism, editorializing, superficial analysis -- that inherently imply WP:OR and WP:SYNTH problems...
Click to read more »reports.Suriname0 (talk) 19:29, 5 June 2026 (UTC) To add a small bit of editorializing: this is not a slam-dunk keep. The best sources imo are the Linux Magazine...
Click to read more »easy -- if you bother to read the article you'll see that the only editorializing is the note at the very top; I've struck it off. -- Now, I do understand...
Click to read more »It contained the grossly obvious (and ridiculously misplaced) POV editorializing of " which ought to be a part of Pakistan. Therefore Pakistan Army had...
Click to read more »Helpful Raccoon (talk) 04:59, 18 February 2026 (UTC) "his editorializing" Whose editorializing? Are you talking about a specific editor? Dimadick (talk)...
Click to read more »a potentially useful basis for further development (though all the editorializing would need to be stripped out). Nick-D (talk) 10:44, 12 March 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »I've read the rewrite. The problem is still that you have too much editorializing in this. Don't get me wrong--- same-sex marriage is a valid topic for...
Click to read more »and that too much of the article (however sourced) involves gossip, editorializing and innuendo to a degree that we would never tolerate in a contemporaneous...
Click to read more »sources actually say those things? Because much of it seems to be WP:editorializing, and not something that would be written by them themselves. Did Marsh...
Click to read more »show's name. What's wrong if the Guardian article is biased? It is editorializing but the fact that is being reported is hardly being challenged. Based...
Click to read more »July 2026 (UTC) This problem could be solved if we were to just stop editorializing and labeling in article titles. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:41, 23 July...
Click to read more »numbers -- which, until I poleaxed it for WP:NPOV compliance, was being editorialized as a special nadir in "the history of gay journalism". (However, since...
Click to read more »there will never be a definitive list." - the phrasing here is a bit editorializing There's a lot of inconsistencies in the Notes column between whether...
Click to read more »America1000 16:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC) Note Please keep to the facts and not editorialize. Giving out digs doesn't help. As this is a non-English subject and Iranian...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) Who says his second quintet was "great"? That seems to be editorializing. This is the official name of the quintet. Capitalized as proper noun...
Click to read more »Andrew Dalby 23:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC) So noted. Just editorializing on his editorializing. :-) --Kessler 00:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC) Keep. It is our...
Click to read more »"The passing game faltered under the rainy conditions..." - avoids editorializing. Sept. 28 I would clarify/source "perhaps the biggest of the season...
Click to read more »science articles. John Timmer, senior science editor at Ars Technica, editorializes about the state of science articles on Wikipedia, writing "Wikipedia...
Click to read more »feel those other articles mentioned support a common problem (such as editorializing) then please bring that to the discussion. Cymrogogoch (talk) 16:33...
Click to read more »accuse him of guilt. The articles are poorly written and are heavily editorialized. Bfpage |leave a message 13:16, 7 March 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »full-blown personal essay. Not badly written, but unencyclopedic and editorializing. Opabinia regalis 01:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Xdenizen...
Click to read more »to relevant past discussions or administrative actions, without any editorialization Users who any participant has named, or whose actions any participant...
Click to read more »statements of fact are being wildly speculated on, to the point of a editorializing, throughout the article in ways that as User:GorillaWarfare, and others...
Click to read more »"Extraordinary times produced some extraordinary individuals." - uh, editorializing much? Removed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 18:51, 19 November 2015 (UTC) "While...
Click to read more »sources in BLPs ([71]), made negative edits to BLPs ([72]) including editorializing in Wikipedia's voice ([73], [74]), and made arguably BLP-violating edits...
Click to read more »here, I was concerned by issues with OR and inappropriate synthesis/editorializing. As it currently stands, the article heavily relies on game summaries...
Click to read more »and "many people's opinion's), in order to promote their viewpoint WP:EDITORIALIZING Taeyebaar is not acting collaboratively, where "articles should not...
Click to read more »article. Bondegezou (talk) 15:21, 13 May 2017 (UTC) Delete blatant editorializing in the title, online petitions aren't the subject of Wikipedia articles...
Click to read more »(Talk) 16:25, 14 July 2020 (UTC) There are many memorials to Sanders ... editorializing ... let the facts speak for themselves. Removed. Zawed (talk) 10:16...
Click to read more »March 2015 [136] re-added editorializing language. 23:23, 28 March 2015 [137] 23:26, 28 March 2015 [138] edited editorializing language 23:33, 28 March...
Click to read more »back in (I've run myself up to 3RR trying to get them there): "(Undo editorializing language and misstatement that these are neonicotinoids per source....
Click to read more »notes and/or discussion in article. Just don't like the implicit Wiki-editorializing. We should play it more down the middle. If someone really wants to...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) comment Please have another look. An editor incorrectly editorialized and said the US Forest Services credited them. Have you seen the sources...
Click to read more »which contains quotes from the originator of the contest but doesn't editorialize this PC World article which goes more in-depth than the trivial aspects...
Click to read more »subjective opinion and the impression I get that the nominator is confusing editorialized opinions published by reliable secondary sources with Wikipedia's definition...
Click to read more »bad that we have to abolish the article entirely. I expected to see editorializing in the article, and what I find is description. The article also has...
Click to read more »to stick to neutral language in the description of events, and leave editorializing for editorials. The Signpost has often done a good job at that in the...
Click to read more »for all of these diffs. Diff #2 is unsourced and contains clear NPOV editorializing completely inappropriate for a BLP. Diff #3 is BLPPRIMARY, and further...
Click to read more »words to watch, fiction), 2b,c (use of citations, possible synthesis/editorializing), and 3b (unnecessary detail), although I would also question the rationale...
Click to read more »January 2006 (UTC) A map? A picture of food aid convoys? No need to editorialize, of course. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 06:49, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Yap, you...
Click to read more »NOTNEWS, UNDUE, SOAPBOX, and eliminate all the trivial speculation and editorializing. My thoughts are to eliminate this article, and substantially trim down...
Click to read more »contextualized in the article detailing the history of the industry, not editorialized within an article that cannot possibly fall in line with any of our...
Click to read more »stopped now and the total effect of the edits following fixes and sans editorializing/advocacy looks okay-ish. The 'influenced' to 'intimidated' change is...
Click to read more »be mentioned, but I'd certainly remove all the (admittedly sourced) editorializing in that section. Just mention the charges and that they are pending...
Click to read more »professional works being stacked against his group's work are little more than editorializing. Some of these individuals, such as Franklin, appear to have personal...
Click to read more »question is unclear and your link doesn't work. Are you referring to editorializing and perhaps Wikipedia:Neutral point of view? Shantavira|feed me 08:12...
Click to read more »featured list should be able to state clearly. "However" is listed in WP:EDITORIALIZING as a word to watch – it appears five times in this article. Removed...
Click to read more »don't know you could say he was. By placing anyone on this list, we're editorializing. (On the other hand, placing Q on a "List of Star Trek characters" would...
Click to read more »merely presents a list of significant events without any conclusion or editorialization. Synth doesn't seem to be an issue since they are all inherently related...
Click to read more »attention-grabbing decorative quotations. This unencyclopedic approach is a form of editorializing, produces out-of-context and undue emphasis, and may lead the reader...
Click to read more »will be reserve commissioners: 4. User:DoRD 5. User:TParis If I may editorialize a tiny bit, I note that all 3 commissioners have never done this before...
Click to read more »to avoid POV and to provide citations - see [9] or the need to avoid editorializing in one's writing given his last contribution in which he tried to pass...
Click to read more »Series has no right to call itself a "world championship" and they post editorializing comments to that effect. Usually one reversion and a warning are enough...
Click to read more »There have already been multiple edits from Min's team attempting to editorialize the article in ways that either flatter Min or discredit his opponents...
Click to read more »of "we"; that's not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. It uses editorializing phrases and words to avoid such as "it is important to note" or "regrettably"...
Click to read more »In fact, he posted a personal message to me on the page (see the "Editorializing" heading), which I kindly asked him to move to my talk page (which he...
Click to read more »consultants who don't have the word "bodyguard" in their WP bio) without the editorializing or list of non-notable bodyguards of notable people, I would have no...
Click to read more »ones. —Cryptic 00:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC) "Photo-op" may be perceived as editorializing the event. While it was inarguably a photo-op, it also may have represented...
Click to read more »at that point) Finally The Magnificent Clean-keeper reverted with "editorializing and not NPOV even if correct and BTW has no importance" The problem...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) Daranios, Well, you are right that there would be some OR/editorializing. Let's take the 'Knight' example. It is original, as in, we, the editors...
Click to read more »details. This list could use a better lead and copyediting to remove any editorializing (POV) and use more specific referencing. But overall, it is in pretty...
Click to read more »117) and not the abstract. Last, the sentence had problems with WP:Editorializing. That was all this one-sentence edit involved. (2) User:Dlv999 has cited...
Click to read more »and his relatives, and the draft's tone is still very problematic and editorializing: "It is not surprising", "it is reassuring", "it is rather ironical"...
Click to read more »golden/straw coloured beer called Stones Bitter." This sentence appears to be editorializing the quality of the beer. Perhaps you could say Author X of Book Y praised...
Click to read more »IP are both edit warring. The material you want to add looks to be editorializing or WP:Original research. You don't have a reference to show that anyody...
Click to read more »Vaultz pencil box with sourced mention, minus the inappropriate tone/editorializing. Reverted last poorly worded edit.)" Both post to same exact subsections...
Click to read more »than handling the matter themselves per WP:APPEAL. The COI issues, editorializing, etc., don't have a place on Wikipedia and they don't seem to realize...
Click to read more »two separate and unconnected quotes in this way is suggestive and POV editorializing. We can probably paraphrase those two terms, though I think a rewrite...
Click to read more »continuation of the First Silesian War in the lead. It comes across to me as editorializing and, while it might well reflect the view of historians, I couldn't...
Click to read more »science articles. John Timmer, senior science editor at Ars Technica, editorializes about the state of science articles on Wikipedia, writing "Wikipedia...
Click to read more »December 2005 (UTC) Delete insfar as this is original research and editorializing. Doesn't belong here. Jtmichcock 00:50, 3 December 2005 (UTC) Keep I...
Click to read more »actually claimed editorializing and undue weight as the reasons for reverting you ("Get consensus, there appears to be a lot of editorializing in there that...
Click to read more »March 2021 (UTC) Comment: "how a car works" is very subjective; such editorializing is commonly removed from automobile articles. One reviewer loves the...
Click to read more »only of today's articles I clicked on.[2] Look at the "editor's note" editorializing about what an incredible individual this is. Nowhere does this article...
Click to read more »of the new mouse in exhaustive detail. The consumer perception and editorializing is reserved for the last few hundred words. He is also apparently not...
Click to read more »*/Common subheading name of Wikipedia" 08:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC) "Editorializing" 08:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC) "/* Notable Committee member posts */More...
Click to read more »usually have multiple quality issues, to include: Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch -Vague, generic, and speculative statements...
Click to read more »catalogue of all existing works on a given subject.) In addition to the editorializing when describing works (The most comprehensive work on John Neal ever...
Click to read more »developments in EU-Israel relations" and I do see grounds for concern with editorializing and sourcing. Thus, there's a need for editing improvements, ad/or for...
Click to read more »Johnleemk | Talk 05:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC) Of course, admins should editorialize when they feel necessary. Transparency is a good thing and deletions...
Click to read more »hard to remain neutral and objective, stating only short facts without editorializing and linking to independent sources to substantiate all claims like the...
Click to read more »interchanges, but not this. As it is, the article has some significant flaws: editorializing about Los Angeles interchanges, limiting this to stack interchanges...
Click to read more »block log) is probably the one. He seems to be engaged in a bit of editorializing. I don't think this issue is quite "resolved" yet. ←Baseball Bugs What's...
Click to read more »response above seems technically over the line of the ArbCom remedy—he is editorializing about Snowspinner's actions in a forum that is not prescribed by the...
Click to read more »circles. Suffice it to say that I was not objecting to editorializing per se, but editorializing in a way that didn't seem to be justified based on the...
Click to read more »not for sure. I don't really see the connection between PC's off-wiki editorializing and the later claims SA makes in that thread... though I'm willing to...
Click to read more »existence of the AfD, and omit any editorializing. —David Eppstein 03:13, 22 August 2007 (UTC) The editorializing looks appropriate to me. If SPA's are...
Click to read more »allegations that Folke Bernadotte had Nazi sympathies, or else adds his own editorializing comment that the allegations persisted "despite these efforts" (referring...
Click to read more »wikipedia. Also, the argument against this entry sounds a lot more like editorializing than the stub itself. I think perhaps this person has a vested interest...
Click to read more »short, the entire edit is a pretty obvious attempt at synthesis and editorializing, both of which are against Wiki policies. The WP:SPAs don't exactly...
Click to read more »similar, or padding-out CESNUR, Bitter Winter, and related with tedious editorializing, promotional minutia, and peacock words. This version of Bitter Winter...
Click to read more »automatically notable because she took a photograph of a famous person, or who editorialized on a war. As with many a journalist, there are few reliable sources...
Click to read more »43 (talk) 11:55, 6 June 2011 (UTC) I reverted it on the grounds of editorializing. If the IP persists, semi-protection of the article might also be called...
Click to read more »also shaped by seemingly unyielding poverty, both rural and urban" (editorializing tone, "unyielding") The official Indian defence budget for 2011 was...
Click to read more »about that. The Forward, usually considered a reliable source, has editorialized on the family's record, pulling together the family's various criminal...
Click to read more »inappropriate and ineffectual for running the Foundation – I don't feel safe editorializing about what membership could mean for the future of the Wikimedia movement...
Click to read more »(Note: I have announced my potential conflict of interest here. I don't editorialize, just list verifiable facts. Profjrhodes (talk) 16:53, 23 January 2022...
Click to read more »position of Wikipedia to make any claims against a belief system or to editorialize such. To balance an article that may appear to be fringe, proper sources...
Click to read more »non-notable financial institution. All references provided are either editorialized routine financial anouncements or from non-notable news-sources. This...
Click to read more »sources in BLPs ([12]), made negative edits to BLPs ([13]) including editorializing in Wikipedia's voice ([14], [15]), and made arguably BLP-violating edits...
Click to read more »(talk) 11:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC) Another comment: some sentences seem to editorialize without any source, using statements such as "note that...". For example...
Click to read more »Carson, California Disastrous in the heading seems a little too much editorializing. Just "Debut season" All the records need to have en dashes (i.e. 1-8-1...
Click to read more »to any article and singling these topics out as undeserving is a bit editorializing, even if I pretty much agree. Metallurgist (talk) 16:15, 23 July 2025...
Click to read more »hybridization, erasing mention of "natural" food * Refutes Seralini with OR/editorializing, misleading edit summary *, with OR and "weedcontrolfreaks.com" * Removed...
Click to read more »currently promotes your guide to the exclusion of all others; strange editorializing. Polargeo, please stop making false accusations and personalizing discussions--...
Click to read more »removal, summary "Editorialized description of content can go under 'controversy' sub...not in lead." revert 1, summary "Editorialized description of content...
Click to read more »product of original research (by their own admission) and rife with editorializing comments. These were removed with an explanation as to why - however...
Click to read more »summary: "/* Immersion as normative in various denominations */ Removed editorializing; let the sources speak for themselves (and you quoted the ODCC twice_")...
Click to read more »is this actually stated explicitly in the source, or is it your own editorializing? If so, it verges on WP:original research or . Some Wikipedia articles...
Click to read more »thrust this down readers' throats at every turn. We describe, we don't editorialize. We don't say "The central characteristic defining the Messianic Jewish...
Click to read more »SoWhy 19:43, 21 September 2018 (UTC) It's an op/ed piece, filled with editorializations and opinions of the author, and written in a novelesque format rather...
Click to read more »which it clearly is: the additions tunred it into a narrative that editorializes itself (POV is one thing; commentary is another). Even answers.com,...
Click to read more »the article, often with the same or similar edit summaries ("Removed editorializing.") They were both very strongly opposed to Jamie Eilat's suggestion...
Click to read more »well). I agree that the lengthy diatribe by the closer seems to be over editorializing and reflects the thoughts/opinions of the closer rather than providing...
Click to read more »Page is independent of the subject, and does not engage in soapbox editorializing. Merely states chronological order of events. TheCanuckGeneral 15:33...
Click to read more »BLP issue, unsourced addition that cannot be verified inappropriate editorializing -- good example of how this user combines some good edits with inappropriate...
Click to read more »falling profits, and technical issues with DOS.[13]" "veterans" may be editorializing ditto "evolved" "might be too much" - how so "Publications took note...
Click to read more »May 2011 (UTC) "Unasailable ivory tower position." In other words, editorializing and POV-pushing. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 22:20, 31 May...
Click to read more »talk page have gone unheeded. In addition, he is now adding personal editorializing to the Wikipedia article here. Thanks in advance for any assistance...
Click to read more »historically not true. My contributions have been numerous and without editorializing, sticking with scholarly intents only. I like Wikipedia, but feel that...
Click to read more »descriptive and neutral title and heavy editing to remove journalese and editorializing. Not sure that this should be broken up or moved into articles about...
Click to read more »The Forbes list being referenced is over 3 years old. There is an editorializing tack-on phrase added to the sentenced being "cited." This is hack "editor"...
Click to read more »studied them pretty thoroughly), so I don't want to go introducing any editorializing into the article. Some of the lack of long-term perspective is probably...
Click to read more »opinion pieces." The summaries listed for every NFL game are too much editorializing and too detailed in facts for a proper current events page which is...
Click to read more »made. Writing a good lead is difficult. Robert McClenon warned against editorializing, such as describing JSB's research as "noted" without attributing that...
Click to read more »“Ta fys aym”. 21:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC) I have removed the editorializing; Fys is perfectly entitled to change his name. I think that removing...
Click to read more »which include a title change, a reassessment of the scope, MoS errors, editorializing, and so on.Cptnono (talk) 07:28, 2 August 2010 (UTC) I liked your comment...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Why not try working to create an encyclopedia instead of editorializing? User:Zoe|(talk) 19:54, 23 May 2006 (UTC) I am sure that you'd feel...
Click to read more »again") 22:56, 19 September 2008 (edit summary: "/* Bridge controversy */ editorializing in caption") 22:58, 19 September 2008 (edit summary: "/* Bridge controversy...
Click to read more »and what is not, as well as to filter out the significant bias in the editorializing and spin that is sure to come from such a partisan editor.Giovanni33...
Click to read more »consisted of mainly un-sourced original research and hyperbolic POV editorializing and commentary. I also found new sources and cited, adding other factual...
Click to read more »all for democratic involvement, but not by adding weasel words and editorializing language to what should be a neutral, encyclopedic source. EATC (talk)...
Click to read more »The first sentence (which is the most objectionable one, since it is editorializing comment, not supported by the sources, and violates BLP) was in the...
Click to read more »Comments: Editor continues to flout WP:CAPITALS WP:OVERLINK WP:ROC WP:EDITORIALIZING. I have directed him/her to WP:OWNERSHIP, wikipedia abbreviations and...
Click to read more »removed it.[350] (4) I shortened some of the criticism and replaced the editorializing with quotes; you undid both changes.[351] (5) And I once again tried...
Click to read more »article, text about Susan B. Anthony's publication The Revolution "editorializing" against abortion, text that is questioned as to its accuracy, authorship...
Click to read more »Comments: This IP user is repeatedly inserting a piece of inappropriate editorializing into the Pantyhose article. He has ignored requests to stop on the IP...
Click to read more »contradicting or mocking the preceding content. While amusing, this user's editorializing was inconsistent with the neutral tone required of an encyclopedia....
Click to read more »account to imitate another editor to continue to insert his unsourced editorializing fringe POV-pushing, the only thing that's keeping me from dumping this...
Click to read more »3 December 2012 (UTC) Keep per reasons given by Guinsberg (less the editorializing). The article has reliable sources and reasonably broad coverage. It...
Click to read more »incivility, the damage caused by editors misquoting, plagiarizing and editorializing destroys the credibility of our encyclopedia. Increased transparency...
Click to read more »Jews[66] or point out "banking" as a particularly Jewish profession) editorializing[67][68][69][70][71][72][73] repeatedly posting barely relevant facts...
Click to read more »noticeboards over it, and apparently plans to continue. I removed Geogene's editorializing from the Lede, which was an OR caveat she added to some research that...
Click to read more »Smallbones(smalltalk) 01:11, 17 April 2019 (UTC) As far as I can tell, allegations of editorializing were first made in August 2018 on the talk page of the article. The...
Click to read more »Section headers must be neutral, descriptive, and are not to be used for editorializing or soapboxing [98] Edit warring to keep editor's name in a link to a...
Click to read more »ultra-conservative Republican' in the lead of the article. That sounds like editorializing in Wikipedia's voice. Groupthink also changed 'conservative' to 'paleoconservative'...
Click to read more »the same thing. Starting that sentence with any of these is subtle editorializing. —valereee (talk) 11:38, 18 November 2020 (UTC) @Girth_Summit The use...
Click to read more »promulgating biased, novel information. He refuses to be neutral in his editorializing. (Walkel01 (talk) 00:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)) here -->Walkel01 (talk)...
Click to read more »Tried to initiate a dialog, without much progress. Seems intent on editorializing on government spending on the Aurora Flight Sciences wikipedia page...
Click to read more »psychiatrist and neurologist) in the article lead is inappropriate. It is also editorializing in the lead of an article about a living person. Problem B) (in short)...
Click to read more »and now 75.181.159.63 (Oct 08). The content added is highly POV, and editorializing. There has been no response to repeated requests for discussion of the...
Click to read more »[diff] Comments: Could an admin please stop Brownwn's edit warring (and editorializing/WP:NOTADVOCATE violations). Astonishingly, the editor is telling readers...
Click to read more »advance on the talk page to rewrite the article to remove the awful editorializing that promotes a POV. I'd already done the same thing on the Peter Hart...
Click to read more »(activist): [40]. I started checking the citations, and quickly found WP:EDITORIALIZING and WP:SYN, as I explained on the talk page here, here (n.b. comments...
Click to read more »articles. They need to be summarized, text attributed to reliable sources, editorializing removed, and abundant references provided. If editors are not willing...
Click to read more »25 August 2015 (UTC) Shoots' edits may be accurately described as editorializing, aka POV pushing, but they are certainly not vandalism, which Wikipedia...
Click to read more »almost impossible to figure out what's going on here because of all the editorializing and irrelevant comments in here. Content disputes on the article are...
Click to read more »honestly and obviously using the situation of this failing image to editorialize, in so many definitions of that word, if not all of them. There have...
Click to read more »that you actually admit is a factually accurate statement is a form of editorializing. That is simply a baseless claim on your part. Freeknowledgecreator...
Click to read more »When unnecessary for disambiguation purposes, such tags constitute editorializing, which we specifically endeavor to avoid. Such tags also run contrary...
Click to read more »So far, all that exists are unsubstantiated theories.-" Unsourced editorializing on an FA. Just disruptive. Please consider a block here as well. Thanks...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Result: Page semiprotected one month. The IP user has been editorializing in article space, posting a complaint about the actions of the local...
Click to read more »Adult Swim's Toonami block starting from July 27, 2013" - eventually is editorializing, and the tense is wrong "The first DVD and Blu-ray Disc volumes[...]concluded...
Click to read more »discussion. Could an admin please put a stop to Wayne22222's disruptive editorializing and soapboxing at Israeli settlement, as well as their abusive edit...
Click to read more »and its important to discuss them. However this type of one sided editorializing does not do this. Combined with the other lets beat on the sister projects...
Click to read more »blindly revert my edits on Fez (hat). My explanation with regard to their editorializing to give undue weight to a non specialist was simply ignored and so were...
Click to read more »first edit was adding the new discussion title "Misinformation from editorializing the suspension of remote work at Tesla and SpaceX" above your reply...
Click to read more »Darkknight2149, some of us view it as BLP violation of the first order: as pure editorializing. El_C 09:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC) Whilst I don't agree with the use of...
Click to read more »material improper and subject to removal. And then there's the POV editorializing by WP editors which is never supposed to see the light of day in the...
Click to read more »of dubious sources that Nick has pointed out, the dense and at times editorializing prose that Sandy and I have found, the tone of portraying the British...
Click to read more »Minimalism */ reply" Comments: The editor seems to push WP:OR and WP:Editorializing. Tgeorgescu (talk) 15:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) I just reached out to...
Click to read more »contributed to the poor performance?), "only" comes off as editorializing Un-editorialized. GeraldWL 16:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC) "born from" should...
Click to read more »Talk:Paracetamol#Toxicity Comments: Abductive is adding UNDUE and unsourced, editorializing content about possible toxicity of acetaminophen/paracetamol to fetuses/infants...
Click to read more »not to claim ownership of the article by either Elvey or myself. My editorialization is in the "comments" column. The table is based on the comparison here...
Click to read more »editorial implication, "Well they SHOULD have!"). That's unacceptable editorializing. Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC) I found the...
Click to read more »but it is a direct claim that needs WP:V support, else it is just editorializing. Fourth, the whole thing is predicated on a dubious foundation, the...
Click to read more »rather than improving scientific accuracy of the page, which is simply editorializing to strengthen your case61.90.59.68 (talk) 23:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »things a little open and shut, but I wonder if this is simplification or editorializing on the part of the author. Talpedia (talk) 14:13, 6 August 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »a normal use for a template, it's like you're adding an explanatory editorializing note everywhere, which is absolutely not a normal way to present historical...
Click to read more »writing better articles#Information style and tone, we shy away from editorializing and storyboarding. Kindly explain how my edit here removes anything...
Click to read more »SPA on his first edit took out language that does indeed look like editorializing, except that the cited source supports that viewpoint. My guess would...
Click to read more »28 December 2013 (UTC) The lead seems to have a lot of puffery and editorializing. For example: "tremendous spirit", "Millions have done so, both adults...
Click to read more »note that Future-Pref and HxSeek generally work in tandem to revert/editorialize articles relating to the Ancient Macedonians in such a way as to not...
Click to read more »relevant, are discussed by the cited reviews in the section. this type of editorializing is not necessary" 21:34, 10 May 2020 (UTC) "Reverted good faith edits...
Click to read more »Comments: User is slow-motion edit-warring credulous pseudoscience and OR/editorializing into this article about a legendary creature. Jytdog (talk) 15:11, 11...
Click to read more »the very least rename that article. "Benoit family tragedy" is patent editorializing. Try, perhaps "Benoit family murder" or "Murder of the Benoit family"...
Click to read more »definitions or establishing new jargon. It's about commentary, satire, editorializing, etc. In many ways, Limbaugh's manufactured terminology is a defining...
Click to read more »to the page question - he also fleshed out other sections, without editorializing or specifically pimping the CD he contributed to. I think you need to...
Click to read more »July 17 2007 (UTC) Archives not ongoing discussions and not subject to editorializing. I've undone his edits there. I agree with your suggestion. >Radiant<...
Click to read more »ago. Oh, and a particular administrator who loves to cherry-pick and editorialize diffs in order to demonstrate his hatred for me. The claim: moving a...
Click to read more »various warnings on his talk page, he's now engaging in such flagrant editorializing at Viktor Rydberg that I'm just rolling him back. Moreschi (talk) (debate)...
Click to read more »quotations around editor furnished words and terms, which is both unallowed editorializing but also confuses readers when the article intersperses the snear quotes...
Click to read more »possible vandalism" removed here by me Aug 27: "that is indeed unsourced editorializing that someone added to the article, and should be removed" restored here...
Click to read more »out at me recently: This edit from Feb. 13 added some odd, unsourced editorializing to the lede of Fourth-wave feminism about the movement presupposing...
Click to read more »one who risks his life voluntarily , one who sacrifices himself rv: "editorializing from Freedman" - Tiamut, 31 March 2008 "Within the Green Line... Israel...
Click to read more »this page Evidence related to Andrie's use of selective quoting and editorializing in related articles and subjects, that makes it difficult for SSS108...
Click to read more »spin-off articles about notable people etc, but we'd need far less flowery editorializing prose. I say "If", because I've searched using a few chosen phrases...
Click to read more »tlk. cntrb. 19:57, 6 May 2013 (UTC) After reading, I agree. If I may editorialize for a moment (without it affecting my close), I think you're probably...
Click to read more »or Redirect I have to agree with the nominator here. It seems to be editorialized without facts. How do we know if this woman isn’t just a character for...
Click to read more »background. I'd like to help out, but the AFD noted above, while his editorializing on said page seems a bit annoying, I don't see anything further. Could...
Click to read more »this encyclopedia is deeply troubling. Here is just a sample: Lengthy editorializing by at Lei Feng, inserting polemical anti-Communist Party rhetoric. Gratuitous...
Click to read more »user's reverts 04:47, 7 June 2015 (UTC) "Cleaned up sensationalist editorialization" 04:50, 7 June 2015 (UTC) "Clarified SPLC mission" 04:53, 7 June 2015...
Click to read more »communicate the precise meaning intended, did not constitute POV or "editorializing", did not violate well-established editing practices, and were not inconsistent...
Click to read more »{{editorialising}} category links talk edit [editorialising] {{editorializing}} category links talk edit [editorializing] {{excessive citations inline}} category links talk edit...
Click to read more »here at the Trial of Michael Jackson article, you can see me fixing WP:Editorializing/POV. Debating with newbie editors whose sole purpose is to defend Jackson's...
Click to read more »because they did not siut his personal views. He trumped up claims of 'editorializing' , etc, despite the fact I was quoting the scholar themselves, and not...
Click to read more »The edits in question seem to range from simple content disputes to editorializing. Reverting those edits needs to be explained in the edit summaries....
Click to read more »simply "editorializing", since it reads like a little original research essay. And the second one I reverted (so far) I labeled "editorializing, speculation...
Click to read more »and over the 700-word limit per WP:PLOTBLOAT, also poorly written and editorialized. The editor doesn't use edit summaries and does not respond to warnings...
Click to read more »July 2006 (UTC) I've banned Zeq from the article, as he continues to editorialize the lead without discussion. El_C 04:05, 2 July 2006 (UTC) Clear admin...
Click to read more »version is something you ought to be allowed to say. Users are allowed to editorialize about Wikipedia in user space. Have you tried putting it on your user...
Click to read more »reverting me on this page was because of alleged editorializing. But the content he claimed was editorialized was stated in the source, found in other sources...
Click to read more »the removed information was unsourced and appears to be an opinion or editorialized comment. In addition to unsourced characterization of Hufford's views...
Click to read more »than encyclopedic entries. I've now gotten in the way of his prolific editorializing with a couple small edits. Since I've gotten in the way of his carefully...
Click to read more »(UTC) No, I think what you both did was misrepresenting or at least editorializing the sources because the inline references did not say and did not even...
Click to read more »gross violation of WP:BLP. [50] - Sander Säde removes van der Linden's editorializing comment and adds Aaviksoo's reaction regarding mischaracterization of...
Click to read more »warring. I'd also encourage everyone here to seriously limit their editorializing in edit summaries - there is a character limit and your long explanatory...
Click to read more »something vague like "some" or "others". There are some issues with editorializing. For example, "even Van De Mieroop acknowledges"—it does not seem verifiable...
Click to read more »reflective of reality, and not for example editorialize on diffs when simply looking at the diff proves the editorializing is wrong. → ROUX ₪ 07:18, 20 October...
Click to read more »discussion. 98.215.193.216 just came off a 1 month block for POV editing and editorializing through the use of hand-selected categories suggesting that certain...
Click to read more »offense, but without substantion for this claim it looks alarming like editorializing to me. Geo Swan (talk) 03:52, 11 October 2009 (UTC) Comment -- I see...
Click to read more »25 August 2007 (UTC) I'll present this news briefly, without much editorializing. I'll leave it up to others to figure out what this all means, and what...
Click to read more »would offer to him that all could be forgiven if he/she would stop editorializing/opinionating and contribute only substantiative facts to article space...
Click to read more »[213], "what a horribly ugly and useless map" [214], "rv, ugly POV editorializing" [215], "rv, somebody is back at obsessively messing up intro sentences"...
Click to read more »way, this is not just a fringe issue. See Talk:Citizendium/Archive 4#editorializing? for a strange discussion completely unrelated to fringe. As far as...
Click to read more »WP:SPA is using the 'criticisms' section to load original research and editorialize about the church and its positions. I've attepmted to explain policy...
Click to read more »a decent editor should do: check it out, and edit accordingly ("rm editorializing"). Thank you Srich. In other words, the IP was right after all, despite...
Click to read more »of the added material is biased. In some cases, the additions seek to editorialize about the benefits of sprawl, such as changing a section on "Consumer...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) His edits are in little chunks. The first group was some editorializing about dogfighting which was eventually removed. The next was a lengthy...
Click to read more »contentious labels, unsupported attributions, expressions of doubt, editorializing, inappropriate synonyms for "said" or these specific categories of imprecise...
Click to read more »appropriate per WP:IAR and WP:BLPREMOVE. For their history of negative editorializing on the talk page, and then coming here to demand action against the...
Click to read more »a RFC/U on Justanother's behavior around March 8th. I don't want to editorialize, so I'll just say the following diffs give an idea of what occured: WP:RFC/U...
Click to read more »sympathizers." This is just one more of Radford's cheap attempts to editorialize by making serious accusatations against people no longer able to defend...
Click to read more »Theology article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Prosperity_theology#Editorialized_opinion_inserted_into_Criticism_section_as_a_violation_of_multiple_rules)...
Click to read more »institutions) were subsequently discussed at Talk:Somali_Civil_War#Editorializing and then the IP editor (whose precise address seems to change slightly...
Click to read more »plausible way to maintain his authority was expansion" this reads as editorializing. I'd suggest cutting it. I see Bosworth writes "...a dynamic policy...
Click to read more »discussion page. I pointed out on the discussion page that his changes were editorializing in the template which is uniquely inappropriate. Another user asked...
Click to read more »while I have your ear, you may withdraw all you want, but the kind of editorializing you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shattuck Avenue, as a "closing...
Click to read more »view, be it M. von Brunn's, the point of view of the editors who were editorializing on the talk page, or yours and IronDuke's. Nor is it a question of "pretending"...
Click to read more »errors. If Ahem...quid pro quo, cruxador. Or perhaps you will reconsider editorializing what is (ostensibly) a encyclopedia article. Or am I mistaken? is an...
Click to read more »Use WP:RSN to assess reliability of sourcing for disputed claims. 2. Editorializing in Wikipedia[102] ("ominously named") is not ok; anything like that...
Click to read more »(talk) 11:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC) Comment I could do with a bit less editorializing in the nomination statement, and a bit more candor. Of the 12 expressed...
Click to read more »September 2013 (UTC) Note that I have tried to neutralize the worst of the editorializing, but I still think the article should be rebooted. LadyofShalott 17:38...
Click to read more »and many make claims not contained in the source or contain on-Wiki editorializing. As an example, Historicist's most recent edit ats the moment is adding...
Click to read more »need BLP-grade RSs. Please read WP:BLP carefully, and refrain from editorializing. Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 08:17, 2 January 2014 (UTC) I do not understand...
Click to read more »block log) User is engaged in politically-motivated edit-warring and editorializing. User appears to be calling out celebrities who have threatened to move...
Click to read more »"extremely well received" – it's difficult to find the line between editorializing vs encyclopedic tone here as this premiere was extremely successful...
Click to read more »the GrapheneOS article. They remove Yae4's GitHub sources as "highly editorialized interpretation/analysis based on a primary, not notable source". On...
Click to read more »partisan somehow they should balance out an academic book. HarrySime's editorializing is perhaps at its highest level in this edit, where they changed sourced...
Click to read more »userspace again. However, if we recreate the page, there should be no editorializing of the ban reasons - just the date of the ban, a link to the discussion/decision...
Click to read more »(UTC) Let's see... single purpose account, nothing but POV-pushing and editorializing, labeling of fair statements on his talk page as "trolling", behavior...
Click to read more »links to the various specific dicarbonyl compounds and to remove the editorializing editorial comment there? (I anticipate that the IP/Nitrobutane/bloodofox...
Click to read more »initially took a strong stand against lynching" (the "despite" looks like editorializing). Fair enough. Introductory phrase struck.--Wehwalt (talk) 00:20, 26...
Click to read more »information (these numbers are fact, they aren't any kind of opinion or editorializing) and clean up the formatting on the page which is all over the place...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) The user is complaining about my removal of his unsourced editorializing at a variety of places. He has responded by posting on the talk pages...
Click to read more »Chillum 00:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC) The IP's history shows nothing but editorializing, to put it charitably. However, the banner on his page says "indefinite"...
Click to read more »Silentgentleman91 changing the date on years active on Big Pun and overly editorializing dates and years in bio/career section [2] Thompson20 overly fastidious...
Click to read more »provides no example of use from that period." (Noted by BullRangifer as editorializing at DIFF) Adds another source that does not explicitly mention subject...
Click to read more »04:21, 14 June 2011 (UTC) Orangemarlin, again, will you please stop editorializing and using profanity? If you can't edit science, pseudoscience, alternative...
Click to read more »just placed a 31-hour-long block on them for the recent unsourced, editorializing edit to Black Lives Matter, which I saw followed plenty of warnings...
Click to read more »calling me a "wing-nut"? Not to mention my request that he "Save your editorializing for another project." and my efforts at "neutrality"? Plus, did you...
Click to read more »think facts can't be falsified, you are not competent enough to be editorializing here."[89] ""Are you incapable of rational thought? You cannot be that...
Click to read more »the available observations, data, and theories is presented without editorializing. On the other hand, the best way to counteract a perceived bias (the...
Click to read more »basic principles. NPOV - they removed some text last month calling it editorializing but here they added to another article "that arose to fight for justice...
Click to read more »blindly revert my edits on Fez (hat). My explanation with regard to their editorializing to give undue weight to a non specialist was simply ignored and so were...
Click to read more »