that way it is still available to the reader, but not in the body. See WP:EXPLNOTE for options on how to present explanatory footnotes vis-a-vis citation...

references, so they should be listed separately (see WP:REFGROUP and WP:EXPLNOTE for how to do this). See next. Ref. 14 ("I have found no evidence...")...

note. Actually, it's an "explanatory note", and according to the MOS (WP:EXPLNOTE, it's appropriate to use them with citations. The Washington Times has...

style of the article? Achim1999 (talk) 21:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC) See WP:EXPLNOTE. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 00:19, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Your footnote was not...

in reply. --Thnidu (talk) 17:50, 2 April 2016 (UTC) I think look at WP:EXPLNOTE, you use reflist groups with custom numbering crh23 (talk) 18:17, 2 April...

by a superscript Note 1 which links to the footnote. See method D at WP:EXPLNOTE, it is the most commonly used method to sort references and explanatory...

problem is that this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Footnotes#WP:EXPLNOTE says that {{efn}} supports | name= and | group= . I don't think I asked...

footnotes, I'd recommend splitting them into a separate section. See WP:EXPLNOTE. Should the Encyclopædia Britannica appear in further reading or external...

references, so they should be listed separately (see WP:REFGROUP and WP:EXPLNOTE for how to do this). See next. Ref. 14 ("I have found no evidence...")...

note. Actually, it's an "explanatory note", and according to the MOS (WP:EXPLNOTE, it's appropriate to use them with citations. The Washington Times has...

footnotes, I'd recommend splitting them into a separate section. See WP:EXPLNOTE. Should the Encyclopædia Britannica appear in further reading or external...

that way it is still available to the reader, but not in the body. See WP:EXPLNOTE for options on how to present explanatory footnotes vis-a-vis citation...