This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
more understandable prose in conversation. Shortcut WP:EXPLAINLEADWP:EXPLAINLEAD It is particularly important for the first section (the "lead" section...
Click to read more »if the lead is expanded to a full paragraph complying better with WP:EXPLAINLEAD. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 14:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC) @Femke: - I've added...
Click to read more »mind. Almost all readers should understand the lead of an article (WP:EXPLAINLEAD), and most readers should understand the body. "and go through an ontogenetic...
Click to read more »article gets harder to read, I feel that's an acceptable cost as per WP:EXPLAINLEAD and WP:TECHNICAL. At the moment the simple explanation is about two sections...
Click to read more »can we say in simpler terms? If not, I would omit from the lead per WP:EXPLAINLEAD A layer of Ice II (a high-pressure and extra-low temperature form of...
Click to read more »those requiring advanced knowledge or addressing niche specialties. WP:EXPLAINLEAD: For these reasons, the lead should provide an understandable overview...
Click to read more »17 May 2023 (UTC) Another amazing topic! And another one for which WP:EXPLAINLEAD and WP:ONEDOWN are important. What audience are you expecting for the...
Click to read more »but I think some movement can be made towards an easier lead per WP:EXPLAINLEAD Both the first and second sentence say the genus only has one species...
Click to read more »it's difficult to come up with alternative wording. I think it fails WP:EXPLAINLEAD. The source you gave to support this statement does not contain the words...
Click to read more »article and find the information they need. Shortcut WP:EXPLAINLEADWP:EXPLAINLEAD It is particularly important for the first section (the "lead" section...
Click to read more »the lede accessible. With these scores, I think the articles fails WP:EXPLAINLEAD, which I think is the most important aspect of criterion 1a. Femke Nijsse...
Click to read more »clear. (It should be understandable without referring to the body per WP:EXPLAINLEAD. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 06:47, 30 August 2025 (UTC) I replaced "necessary"...
Click to read more »and birds) than Lepidosauria (tuataras, lizards and snakes). Per WP:EXPLAINLEAD, words like Anapsida, diapsida should not appear in the lede and definitely...
Click to read more »and birds) than Lepidosauria (tuataras, lizards and snakes). Per WP:EXPLAINLEAD, words like Anapsida, diapsida should not appear in the lede and definitely...
Click to read more »is highly technical, and will need some rethinking to comply with WP:EXPLAINLEAD. Good luck! Femke (talk) 19:25, 6 May 2022 (UTC) Very important article...
Click to read more »19:16, 29 September 2021 (UTC) Sinter is mentioned quite often. Per WP:EXPLAINLEAD, could you add something like (mineral deposit with small cavities) after...
Click to read more »up to personal preference) I'd prefer to err on the safe side per WP:EXPLAINLEAD established an independent state in the region six years later; known...
Click to read more »readers will not understand a majority of the sentences there. Per WP:EXPLAINLEAD, it should be understandable to a broad audience, which, in this instance...
Click to read more »working on it. I'll be focusing on the first paragraph in light of WP:EXPLAINLEAD. Note I'm unburdened by any topic knowledge. I'll be underlining those...
Click to read more »ancient Greek, portuguese, french and whatever the other languages are. WP:EXPLAINLEAD will be key to getting a better article. A tremendous challenge. —Femke...
Click to read more »the first paragraph is a bit too difficult, and you may be able to WP:EXPLAINLEAD more effectively (diverse and plural?). Overall, the lead is written...
Click to read more »00:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC) Normally my drive-by comments focus on WP:EXPLAINLEAD. The "broadest likely audience" might not be a general audience here...
Click to read more »type specimen belongs in the lead, as it's overly technical (per WP:EXPLAINLEAD). I think it's necessary to state what the common name means in the intro...
Click to read more »residents), could this word be replaced by a plain English equivalent per WP:EXPLAINLEAD? Added a parents. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:43, 16 June 2025 (UTC) Possibly...
Click to read more »for an article like this with an expected wide audience (WP:ONEDOWN/WP:EXPLAINLEAD) I believe all indices in the infobox are US-specific? If so, is there...
Click to read more »readers. I love history, yet I've never seen that term before. The WP:EXPLAINLEAD guideline says that the lead section must be understandable to just about...
Click to read more »going to do a full review, only looking at compliance of MOS:JARGON/WP:EXPLAINLEAD. At the moment, the lead is much too difficult. Please avoid stating...
Click to read more »if the lead is expanded to a full paragraph complying better with WP:EXPLAINLEAD. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 14:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC) @Femke: - I've added...
Click to read more »working on it. I'll be focusing on the first paragraph in light of WP:EXPLAINLEAD. Note I'm unburdened by any topic knowledge. I'll be underlining those...
Click to read more »is compromised. It isn't aligned with the guidelines provided at WP:EXPLAINLEAD. I didn't remove any content. I tried to break the long sentences and...
Click to read more »jargon like genus. Similarly, the word monotypic does not belong per WP:EXPLAINLEAD, as words in the lead typically need to be understandable on sight. The...
Click to read more »the lede accessible. With these scores, I think the articles fails WP:EXPLAINLEAD, which I think is the most important aspect of criterion 1a. Femke Nijsse...
Click to read more »doesn't give its start or end dates, which are likely needed per WP:EXPLAINLEAD. In fact, the only event between 1752 and 1787 the lead dates is his...
Click to read more »g. clade is still unexplained), the lead still doesn't fully meet WP:EXPLAINLEAD with words like 'cephalopod', there's accessibility issues with WP:NOHIDE...
Click to read more »those requiring advanced knowledge or addressing niche specialties. WP:EXPLAINLEAD: For these reasons, the lead should provide an understandable overview...
Click to read more »readers will not understand a majority of the sentences there. Per WP:EXPLAINLEAD, it should be understandable to a broad audience, which, in this instance...
Click to read more »going to do a full review, only looking at compliance of MOS:JARGON/WP:EXPLAINLEAD. At the moment, the lead is much too difficult. Please avoid stating...
Click to read more »for an article like this with an expected wide audience (WP:ONEDOWN/WP:EXPLAINLEAD) I believe all indices in the infobox are US-specific? If so, is there...
Click to read more »00:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC) Normally my drive-by comments focus on WP:EXPLAINLEAD. The "broadest likely audience" might not be a general audience here...
Click to read more »the article's lead should be understandable to a wide audience, per WP:EXPLAINLEAD. But we often fail to comply with that guideline. So instead of giving...
Click to read more »type specimen belongs in the lead, as it's overly technical (per WP:EXPLAINLEAD). I think it's necessary to state what the common name means in the intro...
Click to read more »readers. I love history, yet I've never seen that term before. The WP:EXPLAINLEAD guideline says that the lead section must be understandable to just about...
Click to read more »g. clade is still unexplained), the lead still doesn't fully meet WP:EXPLAINLEAD with words like 'cephalopod', there's accessibility issues with WP:NOHIDE...
Click to read more »clear. (It should be understandable without referring to the body per WP:EXPLAINLEAD. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 06:47, 30 August 2025 (UTC) I replaced "necessary"...
Click to read more »but I think some movement can be made towards an easier lead per WP:EXPLAINLEAD Both the first and second sentence say the genus only has one species...
Click to read more »doesn't give its start or end dates, which are likely needed per WP:EXPLAINLEAD. In fact, the only event between 1752 and 1787 the lead dates is his...
Click to read more »up to personal preference) I'd prefer to err on the safe side per WP:EXPLAINLEAD established an independent state in the region six years later; known...
Click to read more »