Redirect to:
comments there at their discretion. Shortcuts WP:ESDOSWP:ESDOS WP:ESDONTSWP:ESDONTS Be careful with edit summaries - They are relatively short comments, often...
Click to read more »clearly intentional breakage of policy, talk headings (however, see: WP:ESDONTS) or edit summaries (see {{No personal summaries}}), it should apply in...
Click to read more »think it violation of WP:ESDONTS then "Delete edit summary", or admonish the editor for embedding comments which breach WP:ESDONTS into the edit history...
Click to read more »violation of WP:ESDONTS multiple times, whereas the word "obnoxious" only occurs in Bbx's summaries once, and it's not a violation of ESDONTS anyway. It's...
Click to read more »indicate a WP:COI. User's edit summaries also seem to be violations of WP:ESDONTS. PhantomTech (talk) 05:11, 7 March 2015 (UTC) This IP is very likely the...
Click to read more »edit, with an edit summary 'no I don't think so' which seems to breach WP:ESDONTS namely don't 'Make snide comments' or 'Be aggressive' 2.I tried to discuss...
Click to read more »helped by Hipal's inflammatory responses contrary to WP:THREATEN and WP:ESDONTS: Toa Nidhiki05 said in the edit summary "Attacked is not a proper wording...
Click to read more »14:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC) I recommend you (MShabazz) read Wikipedia:ESDONTS. Personal insults and vulgarity is a bright line you crossed, and trying...
Click to read more »difficult, so I should like some admin comment on the present violation of WP:ESDONTS, which is a policy and not a mere guideline. Look at the statements above...
Click to read more »be required to delete the insult according to WP:AVOIDYOU, WP:NPA, WP:ESDONTS, etc. --Keysanger (talk) 12:41, 17 October 2014 (UTC) Reasonably certain...
Click to read more »has even happened in response to an edit summary that already linked WP:ESDONTS. Nightscream, is there something unclear about the civility policy or can...
Click to read more »list of things we're not supposed to do in edit summaries (diff for WP:ESDONTS; diff for WP:SUMMARYNO), so that may not be so far off. Hopefully, we can...
Click to read more »SUMMARYNO policy, but appeared reasonably polite. However, after I cited WP:ESDONTS and SUMMARYNO to them, the user claimed no wrong-doing and stated that...
Click to read more »two RM discussions, which are repeated in edit summaries (contrary to WP:ESDONTS)? Some examples among many: [233] " saying you lied is not a personal attack"...
Click to read more »violate it Jan 31 2019 BATTLEFIELD EDITING in vio of civility policy at WP:ESDONTS; Here BL names another editor in an edit sum for purpose of attack using...
Click to read more »Wikipedia". This is uncivil, aggressive, and snide, in violation of WP:ESDONTS, and it is belittling a fellow editor in violation of WP:IDENTIFYUNCIVIL...
Click to read more »apparently I just learned is completely okay per Jytdog above. So much for WP:ESDONTS?) as a reason to oppose. I especially take great issue with edit summaries...
Click to read more »the opposite way of WP:CIVILITY (particularly, but not exclusively, WP:ESDONTS). Ideally I want this to be solved in a way that is, at the very least...
Click to read more »President mis-spelled the word. Also, your edit summary definitely violates WP:ESDONTS. Nobody can force you to issue an apology, but what you did violated Wikipedia's...
Click to read more »(including factually false and some cases incivil edit summaries, per WP:ESDONTS) were nonconstructive, at which point I posted to AN/I [114], linking extensive...
Click to read more »talk page interaction is sometimes just bizarre (diff, diff - you citing ESDONTS is particularly ironic); but for me I think the icing on the cake is your...
Click to read more »an edit summary on a talk page to make a snide comment in breach of WP:ESDONTS [24] misuses Wikipedia policies by using them selectively e.g. uses WP:WEIGHT...
Click to read more »discourage this, namely the section of the civility guideline called WP:ESDONTS and the section of the edit summary guideline called WP:SUMMARYNO. Both...
Click to read more »• [150] • [151]. Though the clear "Dont's" of edit summaries under WP:ESDONTS include "Don't make snide remarks" and "Don't be aggressive", User:Binksternet...
Click to read more »second, using edit summaries in a manner disparaging to other editors (WP:ESDONTS). I will grant that her statement may come across as relatively mild (Tag...
Click to read more »as aggressive." Aggressive editing is a specific behavior listed at WP:ESDONTS so the connection between template placement by an involved user and uncivil...
Click to read more »non-TBAN areas, his edit summaries are concerning, sometimes falling under WP:ESDONTS and can appear as uncivil, even when doing otherwise mundane. Such as using...
Click to read more »