This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Shortcut WP:EEMLWP:EEML Main case page (talk) — Evidence (talk) — Workshop (talk) — Proposed decision (talk) Case clerks: KnightLago (talk) & Mailer diablo...
Click to read more »Molobo have already been subject to many sanctions (sysop decisions, 3RR, EEML arbitration remedies and AE) for disruptive behavior, including blocks, 1RRs...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) is currently under topic ban following the WP:EEML case. [10]. Martintg is topic banned from articles about Eastern Europe,...
Click to read more »this arbitration should only deal with disruption in the EE editing post-EEML. --Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 10:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Comment by...
Click to read more »the WP:EEML, and participated in the cabal's campaign of disruption.[22]. Further evidence of disruption caused by Biophys can be found at WP:EEML/Evidence...
Click to read more »Evidence of Biophys' disruption in the article from the EEML case: [68] After some time since the EEML case Biophys comes back to the article to reinsert his...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:EEMLWP:EEML Main case page (talk) — Evidence (talk) — Workshop (talk) — Proposed decision (talk) Case clerk: KnightLago (talk) • Drafting arbitrators:...
Click to read more »was joined by EEML-member Molobo aka Mymoloboaccount [34] and resulted in an unsuccessful RM. During the RM, Radeksz attacked former EEML-target Varsovian...
Click to read more »on or unnecessarily interacting with editors who were the subject of the EEML case, and Biophys is topic-banned from articles related to the former Soviet...
Click to read more »Committee; he cannot regain the bit via a request to a bureaucrat. (Announcement) EEML: A motion passed which expanded Radeksz's ability to edit unreferenced Polish...
Click to read more »was a “growing tiredness within the Arbitration Committee for all things EEML related” which "confused" an editor a bit. Other arbitrators asked participants...
Click to read more »Architecture . Features and admins The best of the week . Arbitration report EEML amendment requests & more . Technology report Bugs, Repairs, and Internal...
Click to read more »09 by Vecrumba on on EEML/Evidence (not mentioning the block) 1 Oct 09 by Radeksz on EEML/Evidence 1 Oct 09 by Martintg on EEML/Evidence (Martintg introduces...
Click to read more »Architecture . Features and admins: The best of the week . Arbitration report: EEML amendment requests & more . Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal...
Click to read more »maybe I exchanged about 1500 emails since EEML case ended. I can't recall any specifc ones with parties to EEML, but I am sure there were a few. 10? Maybe...
Click to read more »Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML . Technology report Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News . ← Previous...
Click to read more »13:06, 26 October 2009 (UTC) Please note: User Russavia is a listed party in EEML ArbCom case while User Jehochman remains actively involved in arbitration...
Click to read more »week; Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML . Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News ....
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:EEMLWP:EEML Main case page (talk) — Evidence (talk) — Workshop (talk) — Proposed decision (talk) Case clerks: KnightLago (talk) & Manning Bartlett...
Click to read more »(UTC) We'd touched on a few cases other than just the EEML one, but with the exception of a few EEML case participants (mainly you, and that too in relation...
Click to read more »The key difference between CAMERA and EEML is that CAMERA was an external group that entered Wikipedia, while EEML was an internal group of existing wikipedians...
Click to read more »strong suspicion that canvassing by the WP:EEML cabal influenced the previous AfD. Now that several EEML members have been topic banned, it is a good...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:EEMLWP:EEML Main case page (talk) — Evidence (talk) — Workshop (talk) — Proposed decision (talk) Case clerk: KnightLago (talk) • Drafting arbitrators:...
Click to read more »contribs · CheckUser (log)) Hi, I believe that one of the topic-banned WP:EEML members used a SPA and IPs to distort the consensus at Talk:Occupation of...
Click to read more »are by the EEML situation, as well as by Piotrus' response to Q3 above, which I see as going too far in editorializing what happened in EEML. For instance...
Click to read more »There was no EEML in 2007. You can't blame everything on EEML. This whole argument that "I don't like something so I'll just invoke the EEML boogeyman to...
Click to read more »discredit a former EEML-target on 5 Jan 2:16am at WR, received it on 5 Jan 2:31am at WR, and on 5 Jan 9:15am, the diff appeared on-wiki at co-EEML-member Molobo's...
Click to read more »was not "technically part of the WP:EEML, same as you for example have also not been "technically part" of the WP:EEML. I was also not topic banned for "nationalistic...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Deletion review/Richard Tylman (3rd nomination) (diff) (diff). Both are WP:EEML lobbyists (see: warning to Pantherskin) mirroring one another (diff) (diff)...
Click to read more »members of the so-called WP:EEML group, a coordinated cabal which was discovered later (at least 6 votes were by the EEML-associated users). Compare the...
Click to read more »ad EEML arguments in order to expand these EE topic bans to all those they perceive as their anti-communist opponents just because one former EEML member...
Click to read more »last AfD's for this article saw heavy involvement from members of the WP:EEML, hence I am bringing this back to AfD now for re-discussion. Essentially...
Click to read more »who had conflicts with the EEML cabal, and, I recall, someone (probably user:Viriditas) strongly advised me to read the EEML archive and present the evidences...
Click to read more »Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML 2010-11-15 Arbitration report No cases this week; Date delinking sanctions...
Click to read more »involved with any of the EEML proceedings; most recently I was asked about Fifelfoo's activities by someone not on the EEML list, and so I took a recent...
Click to read more »amend EEML Remedy 7 to end the topic ban that applies to Martintg and allow him to edit articles related to Eastern Europe. The locus of the WP:EEML case...
Click to read more »Architecture Features and admins The best of the week Arbitration report EEML amendment requests & more Technology report Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational...
Click to read more »bans, EEML <-> Russavia, all editors so sanctioned may nevertheless comment positively on other editors in the third person. Any individual EEML editor...
Click to read more »was created by User:Digwuren who has been banned for one year due to the EEML case. Anyway, deprodded by User:Sander Säde. Abductive (reasoning) 18:51...
Click to read more »Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML Technology report Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 2010-11-15...
Click to read more »neither a friend nor an apologist of the EEML users. It is true however that I opposed how the ArbCom handled the EEML cases both in terms of how private emails...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:EEMLWP:EEML Main case page (talk) — Evidence (talk) — Workshop (talk) — Proposed decision (talk) Case clerks: KnightLago (talk) & Mailer diablo...
Click to read more »of the EEML, not just those who are banned from interacting with me. I brought attention to the weird sanction placed on me yet not on other EEML members...
Click to read more »over Wikipedia)" In late 2009, EEML-member Radeksz was proxying for blocked EEML-member Molobo with this edit while the EEML case was being investigated...
Click to read more »[36][37] During the WP:EEML case, the wise ArbCom gave Biophys the benefit of doubt (although Biophys was a core member of the EEML and heavily participated...
Click to read more »the initiator of this case is the member of secret nationalist group, WP:EEML. Among of things of this group were plans to stalk users in the real life...
Click to read more »about the EEML group, I was not a member of the EEML group and I don't care what is user:Radeksz writting to you, reporting him on the EEML ArbCom case...
Click to read more »a long list of short and clear statements with bullets: [2], exactly as EEML evidence by Offliner: [3]. All statements by Russavia are made in a very...
Click to read more »banned. Biophys was subject to another Arbcom case after the EEML. The remedies of the EEML arbcom should have quieted the EE are for about a year, but...
Click to read more »is "from the EEML case". However, common sense, and the non-wikilawyering editor, would tell you "from the EEML case" clearly means EEML members. This...
Click to read more »Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2012 (UTC) EEML here is used not as a reference to the EEML arbitration case itself, but to refer to the specific...
Click to read more »"anti-Russian" remark by the nominator is actually a reference to the WP:EEML, in which a number of biased right-wing editors attacking left-wing and Russian...
Click to read more »January prophecy of WP:EEML. Then Biruitorul defends Piotrus, and I see Biruitorul was in EEML too: WP:EEML#Biruitorul, WP:EEML#Biruitorul topic banned...
Click to read more »to be EEML conspiracy) activity in Wikipedia. He also has been previously banned as a result of WP:DIGWUREN case which was also abused by the EEML group...
Click to read more »notably the WP:EEML and WP:CAMERA cases. What do you think of such off-wiki coordination? Are you happy with the sanctions issued in the WP:EEML and WP:CAMERA...
Click to read more »the last editor with an EEML-related remedy still in force, is unlikely to diminish). Lastly, I'd like to note that the EEML case was not about creating...
Click to read more »at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment#Request to amend prior case: EEML. Skäpperöd (talk) 21:42, 12 September 2010 (UTC) My behavior is not "being...
Click to read more »Architecture . Features and admins: The best of the week . Arbitration report: EEML amendment requests & more . Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal...
Click to read more »archive from the WP:EEML case. I never looked at it. Jehochman Talk 03:53, 13 November 2009 (UTC) It is interesting that you bring up WP:EEML in your answer...
Click to read more »to full time editing in several months, regardless of any amendments to EEML. I ask. Why not allow him to return to his area of expertise one step at...
Click to read more »something reasonable and involves three different issues. (1) Yes, I left EEML mailing list. (2) With regard to edit warring, I thought it was enough to...
Click to read more »remark that "The newest case against them is in the works and as Usual the EEML alone are providing the evidence against themselves" which suggests that...
Click to read more »notably the WP:EEML and WP:CAMERA cases. What do you think of such off-wiki coordination? Are you happy with the sanctions issued in the WP:EEML and WP:CAMERA...
Click to read more »Offliner brings up EEML once again, without explaining what it has to do with his breaking a core Wikipedia policy (WP:BLP). And "WP:EEML, which is known...
Click to read more »with the new account and seem clearly related. The dispute is part of the EEML-related Eastern European conflict area, both Loosmark and his opponent have...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The original AFD has been voided because of EEML votestacking (see DRV) and relisted for further discussion. As this is a...
Click to read more »Russavia. From a point of view of someone who doesn't know much about EEML, the EEML-related sanctions and the previous history of Biophys-Russavia relations...
Click to read more »prohibited from commenting on or unnecessarily interacting with editors from the EEML case, except in the case of necessary dispute resolution. Support: There...
Click to read more »report Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution 2010-10-04 Arbitration report EEML amendment requests & more 2010-09-27 Arbitration report Discretionary sanctions...
Click to read more »12:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC) I agree that no one should use expressions like "EEML people" (e.g. here and here), which assumes a collective responsibility....
Click to read more »relation articles, at least until the WP:EEML arbcom comes up with a verdict. Look at the IP if it is EEML-related. Additional comments by editor filing...
Click to read more »disputes related to the EEML case. If you want a deeper clarification you will need to contact Arbcom, although with the entire EEML case being actively debated...
Click to read more »version. Biophys (talk) 18:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC) Was this AfD raised on the EEML? Should the closer assume that it was? Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:41, 1 April...
Click to read more »remind new-comers that VM is the same person as Radeksz who was part of the EEML, which was punished for various things, including coordinating activity off-WP...
Click to read more »Tammsalu was an EEML member (with whom Russavia is not supposed to interact with), since Tammsalu's name is not listed at Wikipedia:EEML#List_membership...
Click to read more »to be a member of the EEML and had their edits proxied on-wiki by their buddies. He continued to coordinate offline with the EEML core even after the case...
Click to read more »- probably created for impersonation of Petri Krohn Various IPs from the EEML mailing list not mentioned here. The evidence contains plenty of personal...
Click to read more »a member of the "EEML" currently subject to Arbcom investigation [109] User:Jacurek has been edit warring repeatedly during the EEML case, and had avoided...
Click to read more »approach in discussion concerned a scholar texts. Seems to me not all WP:EEML [5]. plague were uprooted – unfortunately – in result we have a story described...
Click to read more »not like or/and protect/unblock [10] editors who were his allies in the EEML case. I was among few he focused the most. He started to block me for the...
Click to read more »prohibited from commenting on or unnecessarily interacting with editors from the EEML case, except in the case of necessary dispute resolution. Vlad fedorov (talk ·...
Click to read more »the disruptive role he played in the EEML fiasco. I find this comment highly problematic for 3 reasons: 1) The EEML case before the ArbCom is still progress...
Click to read more »The key difference between CAMERA and EEML is that CAMERA was an external group that entered Wikipedia, while EEML was an internal group of existing wikipedians...
Click to read more »to Eastern Europe?). What is EEML, btw?--FormerIP (talk) 01:18, 9 December 2009 (UTC) Eastern European Mailing List (EEML). Termer has been notified.[5]...
Click to read more »members of the EEML earlier this year. The ArbCom subsequently saw fit to indefinitely restrict that person from interacting with former EEML members [40]...
Click to read more »continued to be one of the most active members of the EEML (Wikipedia:EEML#List_membership, WP:EEML/Evidence). Since I was the one who initiated the SPI...
Click to read more »incidents that also came to light during the EEML case, eg at Kolobrzeg (EEML evidence) (EEML evidence) (EEML#Radeksz FoF as example for "abuse of dispute...
Click to read more »strong suspicion that canvassing by the WP:EEML cabal influenced the previous AfD. Now that several EEML members have been topic banned, it is a good...
Click to read more »my Polish buddies on the EEML (when everything else fails this one always works and who cares i had nothing to do with the EEML) 5) "advised" me to retire...
Click to read more »admitted that you did not forget WP:EEML, and since you have been involved in numerous cases involving the WP:EEML members, you violated these rules knowingly...
Click to read more »includes lies numerous incorrect statements, for example with regard to EEML and editing by certain contributors, although I would rather not discuss...
Click to read more »simply no room for rational doubt that this is from an old participant in the EEML conflict with a heavy grudge and very deep personal involvement in the conflict...
Click to read more »(rather than try and find Consenus on the talk page), using his fellow WP:EEML friends Miacek and Icewhiz to help him return the non-Consensus version of...
Click to read more »than "he was in EEML, he is eeeeeeeeeevil, since we all know EEML was eeeeeeeeeevil. Eeeeeeeeeevil!". We both know very well that if EEML ArbCom case would...
Click to read more »the EEML member Biophys and the user Hodja Nasreddin (at least I never used the abbreviation "EEML" first during the discussion involving ex-EEML members)...
Click to read more »only Moldova topics, my main attacker in the EEML bunch, has stopped any editing some time before the EEML case has ended, despite the fact that he is...
Click to read more »to the EEML proceedings, "harassment" is their labeling me a "web brigadier." Off-wiki, as the result of my privacy being violated by the EEML proceedings...
Click to read more »He was an active member of the WP:EEML under his old name. This is only one example of harassment by former EEML members. -YMB29 (talk) 20:41, 12 February...
Click to read more »prohibited from commenting on or unnecessarily interacting with editors from the EEML case, except in the case of necessary dispute resolution. Vlad fedorov (talk ·...
Click to read more »best wishes" said. If I remember correctly you two were members of the WP:EEML (under your old names) that targeted and harassed users... -YMB29 (talk)...
Click to read more »respected EEML group? What can you say about the Offliner's request regarding Martintg? Was it also a "battleground AE"? Which further AE against EEML will...
Click to read more »Russavia for violating the EEML interaction ban last November involved article changes where Russavia undid four content edits by EEML members on a variety...
Click to read more »editing career. He was additionally topic-banned for 6 months in the WP:EEML case, placed on a no-interactions ban with another user for several months...
Click to read more »that he has not repeated since his return. Citing his involvement with the EEML arbitration seems to be a case of sentencing Jacurek before he is found guilty...
Click to read more »cases, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern European disputes and WP:EEML, are historical curiosities and they don't need to be referred to very often...
Click to read more »EEML, amongst other things, to have abused dispute resolution processes (Wikipedia:EEML#Disruption_4) User:Martintg was covered under Wikipedia:EEML#Editors_restricted...
Click to read more »block user · block log) Sanction or remedy that this user violated Wikipedia:EEML#Radeksz_topic_banned Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy...
Click to read more »whom enforcement is requested [238] During WP:EEML, Radeksz had a finding of fact against him (Wikipedia:EEML#Disruption_6), which stated amongst other things...
Click to read more »you've been harboring against me from 2009 due to my participation in the WP:EEML case against you, and the resulting arbcom decision against you, makes you...
Click to read more »promoting a pro-Palestinian POV, utilizing a discord group, as well as an EEML-style mailing list (Private Evidence A). A significant participant in the...
Click to read more »friend of PasswordUsername/AntiNationalist, based on his statements during EEML case. But even if he is a sock of AntiNationalist, that would be difficult...
Click to read more »taken into account when determining consensus. Support: Boilerplate (from EEML), Roger Davies talk 19:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC) PhilKnight (talk) 19:35, 3 May...
Click to read more »pattern of WP:HOUNDING me, now being investigated by the Arbs looking over WP:EEML. Point 1. Ask any number of Poles, Belarusians, Czechs, or Gypsies, about...
Click to read more »← Back to Contents View Latest Issue 15 November 2010 Arbitration report Contribute — Share this E-mail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Reddit Digg...
Click to read more »from members of the WP:EEML. This comment, absolutely unnecessary in the context of an AfD discussion, is on "editors from the EEML case" and thus a direct...
Click to read more »--bainer (talk) 03:06, 24 November 2010 (UTC) Question from Offliner. In the WP:EEML arbitration, you obviously spent a lot of time and effort in researching...
Click to read more »(UTC) In addition to the CAMERA Arbcom case, I think the more recent WP:EEML case is also relevant to the issue of off-wiki actions. CIreland (talk) 19:28...
Click to read more »general comments on the part of EEML are not very far from the past reality? I think that most editors involved in the EEML case and related discussions...
Click to read more »a one year ArbCom topic ban Wikipedia:EEML#Vecrumba_topic_banned and further editing restriction Wikipedia:EEML#Editors_restricted; has been blocked twice...
Click to read more »organization that does not work entirely on-wiki because of fears over EEML. Of course, EEML had diffs and evidence of tagteaming and !vote-stacking which I...
Click to read more »archives in, as happened in the EEML case, and there is obvious collusion and canvassing as became apparent in the EEML case. Telling us that something...
Click to read more »(see VM post above), let's just go for the good, old EEML members, because, well, they are EEML, hence evil, hence the source of all problems, right?...
Click to read more »November 2017 (UTC) I've been trying to avoid it as much as possible. The Marek/EEML stuff clearly doesn't belong (and edit-warring is always unacceptable, especially...
Click to read more »he was blocked continued to disrupt the project through EEML proxies (Molobo was (?) an EEML member). That his huge block log did not become even more...
Click to read more »the right thing and excludes all the usual suspects from both sides of the EEML issue from it. That's the only way a reasonable debate will be possible....
Click to read more »convince me to read EEML emails, because the EEML members were contemplating something against me. I recall, in 2009, I refused to read EEML's emails, but after...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:EEML#Disruption_4 found that Martin had engaged in misuse of dispute resolution processes and has treated WP as a battleground. Due to Wikipedia:EEML...
Click to read more »put up with his behavior here. I can not help but wonder if that is a new EEML technique to irritate opponents by ignoring opponents' arguments while poking...
Click to read more »listed at WP:RfA ??? And you get votes there from people involved with WP:EEML, the arbcom same case that cost your the mop ??? And now you ask that meta-question...
Click to read more »02:00, 22 December 2016 (UTC) @User:Peacemaker67, he's talking about the WP:EEML arb com case from... seven years ago. And no I didn't start it nor was I...
Click to read more »Biophys, I wrote COI: Biophys is a friend of Tylman/Poeticbents, see WP:EEML for details. I think that is as concise as can be, where do you see problems...
Click to read more »the WP:EEML issue, because that can still be painful for someone, I have to remind to everybody that, according to the ArbCom decision, the EEML members...
Click to read more »refrain from editing at this article for some time, as the stonewalling of the EEML members makes normal editing and article improvement discussions almost impossible...
Click to read more »names of ex-EEML members. I personally see absolutely no problem in VM, Piotrus or Molobo's behaviour, and I didn't plan to resurrect the EEML story. However...
Click to read more »considered as well. Sandstein 20:27, 27 September 2009 (UTC) Wait until EEML concludes. Until the ArbComm case finishes we shouldn't address Russavia's...
Click to read more »that EEML was passed. The original motion was to ban Piotrus from all Eastern Europe articles. Clearly Arbcom was not concerned at the time of EEML with...
Click to read more »it is Likely that collusion took place per the standard established in WP:EEML#Improper coordination. However, this is not a proven fact. Given that, and...
Click to read more »was created by User:Digwuren who has been banned for one year due to the EEML case, which I had managed to ignore until now. The term in Estonian is Find...
Click to read more »was not "technically part of the WP:EEML, same as you for example have also not been "technically part" of the WP:EEML. I was also not topic banned for "nationalistic...
Click to read more »cruelty in his talk page) and relentless (both editors were involved in WP:EEML under the usernames "Radeksz" and "Biophys" respectively), but it can be...
Click to read more »Jytdog has raised have been a problem, and we have had groups (like in the EEML case) that posed vastly more dangerous and insidious a threat to WP content...
Click to read more »Whereas I agree that the explicit reference to EEML is offencive towards the overwhelming majority of exEEML members (most of whom abandoned their old tactics)...
Click to read more »active. Biophys was a member of WP:EEML, whereas Hodja was not used for that activity, and not mentioned in the WP:EEML case. However, a user Hodja Nasreddin...
Click to read more »used in the lede. They have engaged of canvassing of editors involved in WP:EEML - 13:25, 8 October 2018, 13:21, 8 October 2018 (this after - 07:56, 8 October...
Click to read more »to consider a case about Azerbaijani off-wiki coordination similar to WP:EEML (and some of the current warriors were on the mailing list). We knew about...
Click to read more »battleground mentality as much as anyone else. A proposed remedy at the recent WP:EEML arbcom, whilst it didn't pass, has given me some encouragement to "appeal"...
Click to read more »subject of remedies or sanctions logged on the case pages WP:DIGWUREN, WP:EEML or WP:ARBRB, irrespective of whether or not these sanctions are still in...
Click to read more »Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2012 (UTC) EEML here is used not as a reference to the EEML arbitration case itself, but to refer to the specific...
Click to read more »rather than force them to rely on email, etc. Such comments have a very WP:EEML feel to them, and are of a far greater concern to this project than Who R's...
Click to read more »works done." I'd suggest the EEML case at ARBCOM as an example—not all work done by EEML editors was negative, most EEML editors are now highly productive...
Click to read more »the EEML mailing list since it was registered in January 2001, when the ArbCom ruling came to force. He nearly repeats some arguments by the EEML members...
Click to read more »were trying to establish a walled gardeden of articles. I could see the EEML canvasing/off-wiki-coordination remedies, but that's a bit of a stretch....
Click to read more »of the WP:EEML ("circumvent" is an imprecise term for that, sorry) I don't think VM is seriously denying his and MMA's membership in the EEML, the underlying...
Click to read more »was just an statistician who knew nothing about the Holocaust.) Basically EEML-style, only much more disgusting. 80.132.69.140 (talk) 23:10, 26 August 2014...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced Wikipedia:EEML#Editors_restricted Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and...
Click to read more »party to EEML, perbanned in 2011). The immediate trigger of his sanction seem to have been edits by Russavia (talk · contribs) (a party to EEML, permbanned...
Click to read more »block user · block log) Sanction or remedy that this user violated Wikipedia:EEML#Biruitorul_topic_banned Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy...
Click to read more »in EEML case, I am sure that's the latter. My very best wishes I quite surprised by this statement since I was never sanctioned for anything in EEML case...
Click to read more »valuable contributor you should know it.) But as a former member of the EEML list - in this case you had been desysopped and blocked - you can hardly...
Click to read more »this coordination/canvasing via the authorized mechanisms laid out in WP:EEML or one of the related ArbCom cases. Yes I know this makes me the poster child...
Click to read more »named WP:EEML. MyMoloboaccount was several times permanently banned in THIS project [57] and Volunteer Marek was topic banned for the WP:EEML scandal under...
Click to read more »part of the EEML, ganged up with other nationalist Polish editors on an article I created and had it deleted. It was reinstated when the EEML was uncovered...
Click to read more »in this request, given Wikipedia:EEML#Editors_restricted. Should I be expecting an appearance by the rest of the EEML in due course? It will be like a...
Click to read more »11 February 2011 (UTC) Reading the Gtranslated version, it seems to be an EEML-style mailing list used for coordinated edit warring and canvassing. T. Canens...
Click to read more »general issue of nationalism (and beyond that, of religion too), of which EEML is just one example which happens to be current. It's brainstorming on how...
Click to read more »integrity, but you may be assuming too much good faith in the realm of WP:EEML shenanigans. I suggest you forward the email with full headers to OTRS. Pcap...
Click to read more »but by that time my email contact was disabled (I disabled it after the EEML story; I was chocked by that case and I didn't want to create prerequisites...
Click to read more »have I even read the related pages. (I have however read much of the WP:EEML evidence and find it most revealing.) I have followed a voluntary topic ban...
Click to read more »WP:EEML, anyone? Khirurg (talk) 01:08, 14 December 2019 (UTC) Yeah... you accuse me of "bad faith" for pointing out the obvious, then YOU bring up "EEML"...
Click to read more »prohibited from commenting on or unnecessarily interacting with editors from the EEML case, except in the case of necessary dispute resolution. Vlad fedorov (talk ·...
Click to read more »recommend erring on the side of caution. I don't think any of us want WP:EEML redux. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »say to myself I'm just being paranoid. Then I find out about this cabal EEML. And you are involved. I'm sorry, it stinks. NO-ONE ASSUMED GOOD FAITH WITH...
Click to read more »ArbCom, where the case was unfortunately delayed and overshadowed by the EEML case (which was in progress at the same time), very little was addressed...
Click to read more »input, this seems to be going on ever since too, involving Serafin, the EEML and several other sanctioned users. Best Skäpperöd (talk) 14:29, 25 March...
Click to read more »block user · block log) Sanction or remedy that this user violated Wikipedia:EEML#Modified_by_open_motion_6: Martintg (talk · contribs) is topic banned from...
Click to read more »immediately. Additional comments by editor filing complaint This user was with the EEML so this thread will be spammed by supporters and attacks against the messenger...
Click to read more »coordination to POV-push. That kind of thing has happened other times (e.g. EEML arb case) and he has the right to voice such a suspicion if he thinks it's...
Click to read more »rather not... HalfShadow 05:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC) He is at it again, using EEMlV (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)...
Click to read more »been complaining about for a long time... at least since the days of WP:EEML (to which you and VM were a party), if not earlier. And, you were TBANed...
Click to read more »suggestion that this article needs to be taken to an AfD after the closure of the EEML arbcom case closed). It was this interaction that makes me wonder why Malik...
Click to read more »discredited and banned, because he is. In the final decision of the recent EEML arbcom case, he was desysopped, admonished for disruption, blocked and banned...
Click to read more »even looking at this. Disclaimer: I am currently an involved party in WP:EEML. Now for my observation; being a party to this particular RFAr, I have put...
Click to read more »few people would be upset and Igny would probably accuse me of nonexistent EEML connections or some other nonsense, which would open a whole new can of worms...
Click to read more »issue for you. Poeticbent talk 23:16, 16 December 2013 (UTC) A link to an WP:EEML coordinated RFC. Very interesting. Are you implying that the Eastern Europe...
Click to read more ») But you and Bus stop are reacting as if I've accused you of being the EEML. I've said that this is characteristic of you, by the way: playing the man...
Click to read more »remains a true constitution for Wikipedia. In the EEML case you stated that you expected the EEML participants would abandon off-wiki coordination after...
Click to read more »made 3 days before Ottava's announcement. Major motions regarding the WP:EEML ArbCom case (1 day prior). Major motion regarding the allowance of User:Δ...
Click to read more »19 September 2019 (UTC) As you'll see if you put WP:EEML into the Wikipedia search box, WP:EEML is a redirect to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Eastern...
Click to read more »certainly not because of Ancestry.com website. The subject was targeted by WP:EEML, one of the biggest arbitration cases in Arb history originating from Eastern...
Click to read more »idea, but perhaps it's time to read one of the Eastern Europe Riot acts (WP:EEML, WP:ARBEE, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern European disputes)...
Click to read more »hardly object to a disclosure request if WR was a private mail server like EEML, so why should it be different because it's a website? Rd232 talk 18:28,...
Click to read more »history of POV-pushing on Eastern European topics as a former member of EEML (under a previous username). This editor should not be anywhere near these...
Click to read more »behavior in the Eastern European topic area, being one of the editors in the EEMl case and having been sanctioned multiple times since being allowed back into...
Click to read more »all fair and good. But the often extreme fringeness and obsessiveness of EEML beliefs is revealed in this recent post by another former member of the same...
Click to read more »coordinated editing of Molobo and VM has been a well-known problem since the WP:EEML case. HerkusMonte (talk) 09:31, 24 August 2014 (UTC) An IP posted a permalink...
Click to read more »off-WP actions meant to have on-WP effects, such as threats, or as in the EEML case, attempting to stack consensus and target opposing editors). The actions...
Click to read more »amount of accusations and counter accusations reminds me of WP:GS/MMA and WP:EEML so I will endorse regimes that show account holders whose purpose is not...
Click to read more »made by M.K: [2]. In that comment, M.K has commented on me thus: "Old WP:EEML is not gone, at least the most of it. I believe that no one can honestly...
Click to read more »"prohibited from commenting on or unnecessarily interacting with editors from the EEML case, except in the case of necessary dispute resolution." [41]. You were...
Click to read more »because his own identity was disclosed some years ago in the context of WP:EEML. HerkusMonte (talk) 08:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC) Thank you for reminding...
Click to read more »say I was referring to you when I was chuckling about someone comparing EEML to AP2. Nothing in my text would lead anyone but you to think that, though...
Click to read more »vs Poland wikidrama (government payments probably not involved, but the EEML was real). I don't see any allegation of Russian government involvement in...
Click to read more »editors in particular, and possibly others, perhaps similar to that in the WP:EEML. Lastly, I find it laughable that someone who sent me an e-mail saying he...
Click to read more »campaigns to override consensus don't deserve the full AGF. Please review WP:EEML and the MMA wars of last year to understand how disruptive an externally...
Click to read more »Cirt... this Dan guy (two rather long sockplays, I'd think you'd agree). EEML. I think I even saw your name on an ArbCom case once in the area, no? This...
Click to read more »on the topic area in general, it does reflect known history such as the EEML arb case, which was about off-wiki coordination, i.e. sneaking. It wasn't...
Click to read more »amendment of WP:ARBR&I and be approved by ArbCom. I cannot see any relation with EEML. But just to be safe I will make a public declaration: I have received a...
Click to read more »More importantly, three users who restore this text are ex-members of WP:EEML. And, in this situation, to block or warn just a single user, who was not...
Click to read more »any I don't know about any BLPDS sanctions. Previously sanctioned in WP:EEML; Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Russavia-Biophys#Biophys. With the username...
Click to read more »a problem in the past on the project, I draw your attention to Wikipedia:EEML#Canvassing. That you have seen fit to return from an over one-year wikivacation...
Click to read more »despite editors, by the "secrecy of correspondence", did you also mean the EEML list from the deep past?). You still have the chance to apologize, the evidence...
Click to read more »someone who's been on Wikipedia for 15 years or whatever and essentially led EEML, you sure pretend not to know a lot about Molobo, Piotrus. It's not like...
Click to read more »real library - http://www.nbuv.gov.ua. Moreover I’ve a target of the WP:EEML – and as far as I’ve heard – I’ve at their “black list” – while actually...
Click to read more »Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any 22 December 2009 part of the WP:EEML case If discretionary sanctions are requested, supply evidence that the user...
Click to read more »on my page: A case of pro-Azerbaijani off-wiki coordination similar to WP:EEML have been revealed on Russian Wikipedia in 2010, with some of the current...
Click to read more »any I don't know about any BLPDS sanctions. Previously sanctioned in WP:EEML. If discretionary sanctions are requested, supply evidence that the user...
Click to read more »because he and Mvbw were one of the main protagonists in the notorious WP:EEML case. He even made an attempt to remove his old username from the case request...
Click to read more »committee via email. It may be necessary to open a new arbitration case ala WP:EEML. T. Canens (talk) 21:33, 29 April 2011 (UTC) I have emailed the committee...
Click to read more »past, for example, it would make impossible the activity of notorious WP:EEML cabal.--Paul Siebert (talk) 16:32, 31 March 2012 (UTC) If you look at the...
Click to read more »seem to know what the EEML case is all about. Basically, I wonder about an alternative Universe where the private archive of the EEML was dismissed by the...
Click to read more »(starting from his conflict with another user, which gave a start to the WP:EEML story, when MVBW was editing under the currently deleted account "Biophys")...
Click to read more »with the community, something we found lacking in the case history (c.f. EEML for an arbcom/offwiki example and WP:Esperanza for a community/onwiki example)...
Click to read more »institutes like Yad Vashem, which he compared to the IPN. Regarding the EEML, [Piotrus] said that the plans detailed there were never actual, and that...
Click to read more »2014 (UTC) Delete: There is precedent for such things (e.g. WP:RFAR/DDL, WP:EEML), but the linked MfD just isn't important enough. It's not an issue that...
Click to read more »--bainer (talk) 03:06, 24 November 2010 (UTC) Question from Offliner. In the WP:EEML arbitration, you obviously spent a lot of time and effort in researching...
Click to read more »discussion of the Richard Tylman article. Note also the recent, ongoing EEML arbcom case. Pantherskin (talk) 21:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC) See Defending...
Click to read more »to hereby tell me if I incorrect in my assessment of this? During the WP:EEML case, User:Radeksz edited Schieder commission, and instead of posting the...
Click to read more »interaction bans, etc pp.; his disruption was/is not limited to the WP:EEML. I propose to finally ban now, something that should have happened years...
Click to read more »European mailing list, and an attempt years ago to create a similar (to EEML) clandestine 'skeptic' organisation. I have not seen any evidence that these...
Click to read more »on or unnecessarily interacting with editors who were the subject of the EEML case, and Biophys is topic-banned from articles related to the former Soviet...
Click to read more »User:HanzoHattori), sockpuppetry (e.g. User:Altenmann), improper canvassing (EEML case), civil POV-pushing, edit warring, etc. In all such cases, one should...
Click to read more »2011 (UTC) Some examples of tag teaming behaviour were documented in the EEML case. --Tothwolf (talk) 14:54, 6 May 2011 (UTC) Hunter, if you're alone against...
Click to read more »some sort of WP:EEML-related pre-history and it was closed as no consensus by Lankiveil. My impression, however, is that, once the EEML-related acrimony...
Click to read more »There was no EEML in 2007. You can't blame everything on EEML. This whole argument that "I don't like something so I'll just invoke the EEML boogeyman to...
Click to read more »ArbCom, where the case was unfortunately delayed and overshadowed by the EEML case (which was in progress at the same time), very little was addressed...
Click to read more »renewed personal attacks against an opponent in a matter related to the EEML case shortly after coming back from the latest 2-month block. [5]. Fut.Perf...
Click to read more »seem to know what the EEML case is all about. Basically, I wonder about an alternative Universe where the private archive of the EEML was dismissed by the...
Click to read more »needs more safeguards against revenge for the infamous difficult blocks, EEML-type coordination, and unpopular but necessary AE actions. But we have to...
Click to read more »real life political disagreements. He seems to have learned nothing from WP:EEML.Anonimu (talk) 20:50, 21 October 2009 (UTC) I am entitled to have my personal...
Click to read more »(UTC) @Vanamonde93: The issue with this page (and others targeted by the EEML) is the presence of numerous editors on both sides who are certain that the...
Click to read more »saw heavy involvement from members of the WP:EEML", out of 18 users commenting, five were related to EEML - and one supported deletion, three wanted the...
Click to read more »babelfish 06:06, 28 November 2010 (UTC) Question from Offliner. During the WP:EEML arbitration, veteran editor and clerk User:Manning Bartlett banned you from...
Click to read more »version. Biophys (talk) 18:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC) Was this AfD raised on the EEML? Should the closer assume that it was? Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:41, 1 April...
Click to read more »sanctions do not include Turkey-Armenia relations. They are rooted in WP:EEML, and Turkey has never been an issue there. On the other hand, recently the...
Click to read more »"anti-Russian" remark by the nominator is actually a reference to the WP:EEML, in which a number of biased right-wing editors attacking left-wing and Russian...
Click to read more »This is intended to reaffirm the arbitral interaction bans issued at WP:EEML and WP:ARBRB respectively, because the AE discussion raised concerns that...
Click to read more »List case provide a precedent? Cla68 (talk) 23:22, 26 September 2013 (UTC) EEML should provide precedent for offwiki discussion of admin actions. I'm not...
Click to read more »for myself; rather, Mathsci would contend Biophys is joining me in a mini-EEML cabal to assault the Race and intelligence article. This sort of underhanded...
Click to read more »Original discussion The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The original AFD has been voided because of EEML votestacking (see DRV) and relisted for further discussion. As this is a...
Click to read more »members of the so-called WP:EEML group, a coordinated cabal which was discovered later (at least 6 votes were by the EEML-associated users). Compare the...
Click to read more »integrity, but you may be assuming too much good faith in the realm of WP:EEML shenanigans. I suggest you forward the email with full headers to OTRS. Pcap...
Click to read more »justified unwillingness to accept the whitewash of an investigation into the EEML became an annoyance to many highups in Wikipedia and eventually culminated...
Click to read more »was created by User:Digwuren who has been banned for one year due to the EEML case. Anyway, deprodded by User:Sander Säde. Abductive (reasoning) 18:51...
Click to read more »you know what the EEML case is all about. Basically, I wonder about an alternative Universe where the private archive of the EEML was dismissed by the...
Click to read more »think a principle along these lines is needed. Not sure if we should re-use EEML or write one that focuses a bit more on the facts at play here. Barkeep49...
Click to read more »people they agree with; it is human nature. There are situations, like the EEML, when a group of editors worked together to push a POV but I don't think...
Click to read more »place on IRC, are not taken into account when determining consensus. Per EEML Principle 1, specified for IRC Comment by Arbitrators: Is this an issue here...
Click to read more »babelfish 06:06, 28 November 2010 (UTC) Question from Offliner. During the WP:EEML arbitration, veteran editor and clerk User:Manning Bartlett banned you from...
Click to read more »resolution on issues that are best not, or cannot be, discussed on-wiki. The EEML case is a good example. It's not feasible to expect the community to resolve...
Click to read more »here, was also the AfD nominator at the 4th nom (previously) during the EEML attack on this entry, and... due to mitigating circumstances, the article...
Click to read more »being falsified or not, for example? ArbCom has already established (in EEML) that concerted, or effectively concerted actions, are not acceptable, so...
Click to read more »Request for clarification: EEML 7 October 2010 21 October 2010 Eastern European mailing list Request for clarification: WP:EEML (2) 16 October 2010 21 October...
Click to read more »this doesn't spiral out of control. Giano has already played his malignant EEML conspiracy alive and well accusations card elsewhere, I would prefer to believe...
Click to read more »approach in discussion concerned a scholar texts. Seems to me not all WP:EEML [27]. plague were uprooted – unfortunately – in result we have a story described...
Click to read more »here, was also the AfD nominator at the 4th nom (previously) during the EEML attack on this entry, and... due to mitigating circumstances, the article...
Click to read more »justified unwillingness to accept the whitewash of an investigation into the EEML became an annoyance to many highups in Wikipedia and eventually culminated...
Click to read more »this doesn't spiral out of control. Giano has already played his malignant EEML conspiracy alive and well accusations card elsewhere, I would prefer to believe...
Click to read more »real life political disagreements. He seems to have learned nothing from WP:EEML.Anonimu (talk) 20:50, 21 October 2009 (UTC) I am entitled to have my personal...
Click to read more »topic banned for one year from articles about Eastern Europe (per the WP:EEML case) an is unable to participate. I can try to clarify things in his stead...
Click to read more »before the community has made a decision. Since you were a member of the WP:EEML, you should be especially careful not to cause any more disruption. Offliner...
Click to read more »(UTC) That there was an EEML "artificial consensus" in any way different from a consensus which would have manifested sans EEML is the personal synthesis...
Click to read more »particularly useful but I found quite valuable. Nevertheless, he has dredged up EEML and filed innuendo at evidence that I (his use of quotes) have quote-unquote...
Click to read more »This was fine for awhile until lots of controversy happened - basically the EEML arb com case. As a result of the publicity generated during the case I was...
Click to read more »into redefinitions. Likewise, he suggests "possible" similarities with the EEML, followed by a non-denial denial. A nice use of WP:COATRACK in project space...
Click to read more »Status close Request date 19:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC) Requesting party Unknown Mediator(s) Xavexgoem (talk) Comment On hold pending EEML arbitration....
Click to read more »record I am not a member of the EEML and I never was. I do remember that during the EEML case Deacon was an opponent of the EEML and in fact he was so aggressive...
Click to read more »The evidence phase for this case is closed. Any further edits made to this page may be reverted by an arbitrator or arbitration clerk without discussion...
Click to read more »Combination of: WP:RFAR/Dalmatia#Consensus, WP:ARBMAC2#Consensus, and WP:EEML#Consensus. I'll make more if there is positive feedback for this. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖...
Click to read more »its merits but were rather distracted by the EEML case. I don't see the point of waiting until after the EEML case closes; it's not like the problems caused...
Click to read more »prohibited from commenting on or unnecessarily interacting with editors from the EEML case, except in the case of necessary dispute resolution. Vlad fedorov (talk ·...
Click to read more »don't agree with Literaturegeek. Unlike the omnibus case of 2008 or the EEML case, we're not dealing with editors who're co-ordinating their activities...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:25, 16 August 2026 (UTC) Comments by others: Originally used at WP:EEML in 2009. Mainly thinking of the evidence by Staraction here, and so whether...
Click to read more »January 2011 (UTC) It should be noted that Piotrus and I were both part of the EEML so our opinions are likely to be correlated (though not coordinated, dammit...
Click to read more »its merits but were rather distracted by the EEML case. I don't see the point of waiting until after the EEML case closes; it's not like the problems caused...
Click to read more »people they agree with; it is human nature. There are situations, like the EEML, when a group of editors worked together to push a POV but I don't think...
Click to read more »voters actually voted for the admin and later implied to impose some form of EEML-style influence on the admin for POV-pushing or something to their benefit...
Click to read more »and because it was a hotspot of nationalist conflict on Wikipedia (see WP:EEML, WP:ARBEE). It appears to me that 185.49.15.25 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs ·...
Click to read more »is evidence of improper canvassing or coordination (as there was in the EEML case) such factions aren't the issue addressed by the linked essay. Eluchil404...
Click to read more »were to his previous "indefinite blocking" that happened just before the EEML story broke. Always have regard of the names involved. Sense their delight...
Click to read more »Committee; he cannot regain the bit via a request to a bureaucrat. (Announcement) EEML: A motion passed which expanded Radeksz's ability to edit unreferenced Polish...
Click to read more »delete. I.e., it's highly likely that the AFD was rigged. Having seen the EEML investigation now, it strikes me that the AFD should be rescinded due to...
Click to read more »and because it was a hotspot of nationalist conflict on Wikipedia (see WP:EEML, WP:ARBEE). It appears to me that 185.49.15.25 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs ·...
Click to read more »13 October 2019 (UTC) You should have been shown the door long ago during EEML. Irrespective of whether the IP is Icewhiz or not (SPI is that-way), you...
Click to read more »Comment by Arbitrators: Comment by parties: Comment by others: From WP:EEML. Samuelshraga (talk) 05:37, 12 April 2026 (UTC) 3) When a group of editors...
Click to read more »arbcom can do is first, to sanction inappropriate off-wiki collusion (like WP:EEML), though that can be very difficult to prove, and second, to take the existence...
Click to read more »behavior is very near (if not over the line) of several points made in the EEML ArbCom case. Hasteur (talk) 23:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC) I don't think the tweet...
Click to read more »is evidence of improper canvassing or coordination (as there was in the EEML case) such factions aren't the issue addressed by the linked essay. Eluchil404...
Click to read more »come out in support of it. At the same time, the 2009 ArbCom noted in the EEML case that it is sometimes reasonable to presume that a group of editors may...
Click to read more »statement? --Martin (talk) 18:03, 27 September 2010 (UTC) IMO, the notorious EEML case is totally irrelevant to this thread. The problem is that some editors...
Click to read more »lol) that the link to WP:EEML is not an accusation that GSoW is operating in the exact same way or is equivalent to the EEML case (I'm only noting this...
Click to read more »arbcom can do is first, to sanction inappropriate off-wiki collusion (like WP:EEML), though that can be very difficult to prove, and second, to take the existence...
Click to read more »delete. I.e., it's highly likely that the AFD was rigged. Having seen the EEML investigation now, it strikes me that the AFD should be rescinded due to...
Click to read more »article is patrolled and controlled by editors previously sanctioned in the WP:EEML cases. The article as it sands now is a one sided attack on British and American...
Click to read more »solution; only something like an Arbcom case will achieve anything (compare the EEML case). At any rate, the content issues must be kept separate from the alleged...
Click to read more »were to his previous "indefinite blocking" that happened just before the EEML story broke. Always have regard of the names involved. Sense their delight...
Click to read more »come out in support of it. At the same time, the 2009 ArbCom noted in the EEML case that it is sometimes reasonable to presume that a group of editors may...
Click to read more »complexities of the subject and the connection to past ArbCom cases (WP:ARBEE, WP:EEML) they decided to cast it as a conflict between two editors, with the only...
Click to read more »Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML 2010-11-15 Election report The countdown begins 2010-11-08 Arbitration report...
Click to read more »were taken from [102] (this is a part of the discussion of the notorious EEML case on my talk page): the quote begins Paul, you apparently misunderstood...
Click to read more »off-wiki or through email during last 10+ years. I am not saying anything about EEML case, per this advice by Barkeep49. My very best wishes (talk) 03:05, 7 July...
Click to read more »good English language sources on some Russian topics, the ill-famous WP:EEML activity etc.). GreyHood Talk 18:06, 3 November 2010 (UTC) A lot of debates...
Click to read more »misrepresenting the sources listed in this article in your controversial rehash of an EEML attack on my person, or perhaps ask someone else to explain to you in plain...
Click to read more »briefly explained her about the history of EE related conflicts, including EEML and shared some general thoughts on the roots of these conflicts. I see that...
Click to read more »particularly the ones about off-wiki coordination, to cross the line. Ever since WP:EEML, such allegations are taken extremely seriosly. If Mark has evidence of such...
Click to read more »remember the lengths ArbCom went to to avoid quoting from emails in the EEML case?) and SirFozzie should not have been quoting an email of WMC's without...
Click to read more »promoting a pro-Palestinian POV, utilizing a discord group, as well as an EEML-style mailing list (Private Evidence A). A significant participant in the...
Click to read more »Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML 2010-11-15 News and notes Second Wikipedian in Residence, citation needed...
Click to read more »arbitrators Comments by parties Comments by others Shamelessly lifted from EEML P8 and WTC P4. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Object Class: Drygioni 18:05, 7 June...
Click to read more »an anti-Russian POV-pusher and always has been (at least since 2010 at WP:EEML). (link changed from URL to wikilink to work with the quote template). On...
Click to read more »case should have been something like "The ex-EEMLs 14 years later". The presence of 5 or perhaps 6 ex-EEMLs among G&K's alleged "distortionists" (Volunteer...
Click to read more »communicating off-Wiki (41-42 / WP:EEML) Piotrus, VM, MyMoloboaccount and My very best wishes were members of the EEML (42 / WP:EEML) Piotrus has offered other...
Click to read more »TBANed as part of WP:EEML. This is the diff from EEML cited in the paper. Here is where you disclosed your occupation. After EEML, in 2010, you changed...
Click to read more »participation. Comment by Arbitrators: Comment by parties: Comment by others: From EEML with links and wording slightly adjusted. These last two really go hand in...
Click to read more »an Israel-Palestine DS/GS understander, but I seem to remember when GSoW, EEML, etc did this we responded with something other than "close the ANI thread...
Click to read more »canvassing cases which occurred in private or semi-private off-Wiki venues (EEML and Tropical Cyclones) with on-Wiki WikiProjects. Curbon7 (talk) 02:47, 4...
Click to read more »WP:CONLEVEL issues and off-wiki canvassing to an extent I haven't seen since WP:EEML in the ancient times. The latest big dust-up is at WP:ARBWPTC (I know you're...
Click to read more »everything we do here. RoySmith-Mobile (talk) 19:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC) 1) EEML, gamergate would probably like a word. 2) FRAMGATE. ——Serial 20:37, 26 February...
Click to read more »an anti-Russian POV-pusher and always has been (at least since 2010 at WP:EEML). His work here is not so much adding content and sources as removing content...
Click to read more »almost never on the level of bad faith that is embodied in cases such as WP:EEML. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 23:23, 9 February...
Click to read more »to justify Fram's actions or exonerate Thmazing, whose actions smack of EEML or WTC just from a brief glance, and get just as ugly as them if scrutinised...
Click to read more »Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML Ohconfucius 2010-11-08 WikiProject report WikiProject California Mabeenot...
Click to read more »