Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
certain aspects of Wikipedia's norms or practices. It may reflect varying levels of consensus. Shortcuts WP:ERWP:ER WP:EDITRWP:EDITR WP:EDITREQWP:EDITREQ...
Click to read more »org/w/index.php?title=Popcorn_Time&diff=608428314&oldid=608427945 Diff of Editr readding it: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Popcorn_Time&di...
Click to read more »on articles that don't need deletion. If you have a dispute with another editr, don't bring it here. Look to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. -- Whpq (talk)...
Click to read more »academic notability guidelines especially WP:NPROF based on his academic work editr roles and reviewed publications. so, the article kept. (non-admin closure)...
Click to read more »knowledge of Wikipedia users -- specifically Luk3 and Serols -- in one of the editrs. Vandalized the same page. Eumat114 formerly The Lord of Math (Message)...
Click to read more »sources that don't mention the article subject seems pretty common with this editr. Doug Weller talk 12:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »a best-selling author are based on Amazon it would appear. As for the Editr's Choice Award, I can't find any indication as to what that actually is....
Click to read more »great work, but its hella better than a lot that I've seen. I think the editrs bit off a bit more than she can chew -- it's a very complicated and fraught...
Click to read more »find information about dating businesses? Help disappearing text when I editr Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2008 January 19 Proper procedure if your employer...
Click to read more »s_for_deletion/List_of_video_game_collector_and_limited_editions&action=editr that exact information in the future when it's harder to find. Nindanjoe...
Click to read more »fact I only have 56 edits in the talk namespace, I communicate with other editrs in the Wikipedia namespace (631), Wikipedia talk (28) and User talk (575)...
Click to read more »reason to do a sock check. -- SCZenz 22:17, 25 December 2005 (UTC) (after editr conflict) A block on an admin for closing AfD's some of which turn out to...
Click to read more »unecessary/pointy - the points should be discussed one at a time. For a typical editr this would be no big deal, but during a formal mediation it indicates a...
Click to read more »POV-pushers, disruptive nationalists and crackpot theorists, yet a couple of editrs can show up at ANI and try to hound a user out of a namespace on the shoddiest...
Click to read more »seemed unecessary (it didn't seem to have any instrinsic value), the other editrs said 'show me the policy about how we keep stuff out if it doesn't have...
Click to read more »editor can follow the same rules and policies that every fricking other editr has to follow without the Lone Ranger misquoting and misinterpreting the...
Click to read more »not as it is now when a talkpage is updated and then article, the second editr comes in and a edits the talkpage followed by article and so on. What is...
Click to read more »recently reverted me [127] with the edit summary "POV edit by notorious POV editr - restored source info." Even though I provided an WP:UNDUE rationale for...
Click to read more »talk page, when that editor has been here for 4 years and has over 3,400 editrs to 1000 pages? Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:57, 20 December 2012 (UTC) Paul Bedson...
Click to read more »enough to overlook until proper sources can be found? Would you call his editrs WP:FRINGE? SÆdontalk 09:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC) The area he/she edits in is...
Click to read more »and the encyclopedia, plus calling the edit "POV edit by notorious POV editr [sic]" which is a pattern combined with previous reckless BLP-violating...
Click to read more »were OR and SYNTH since the article was based on solid sources and other editrs had immediately started to help build it [37]. I only just now realized...
Click to read more »unfounded accusations of bias and how there is an always unnamed group of editrs against her Seven - again well within her rights to remove what she likes...
Click to read more »information here will aquaint you with the mutual thinking of all of the other editrs, (and the volenteer) who are completely satisifed that Wikipedia policy...
Click to read more »backlog could possibly be a good idea and i don't believe it would help with editr retention. The simple fact is that most things that are speedy deleted were...
Click to read more »←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 19:16, 11 October 2013 (UTC) (editr conflict) I’m afraid of making the mistake of write a large number of pages...
Click to read more »violation of NPA, which is policy. Anyway, it is frustrating to seen the same editrs vote delete for the smae exact reasons on articles which vary widely in...
Click to read more »s_for_deletion/List_of_video_game_collector_and_limited_editions&action=editr that exact information in the future when it's harder to find. Nindanjoe...
Click to read more »on articles that don't need deletion. If you have a dispute with another editr, don't bring it here. Look to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. -- Whpq (talk)...
Click to read more »Risker, citing WP:DUCK, but not bothering to open an SPI. I will alert that editr momentarily, and ask that evidence be presented here. LadyofShalott 01:24...
Click to read more »happened in the climate change area is that there is a big majority of editrs who interpret NPOV, WEIGHT, UNDUE etc. in such a way that this amounts to...
Click to read more »StillWaitingForConnection (talk) 19:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC) Merge per other editr's rational who voted merge, especially Ritchie333's great comment. Too soon...
Click to read more »(UTC) @Doncram: Please explain how each of your assertions ("simpler for editrs"; "mega-template"; "administration costs lower") is true, given that there...
Click to read more »sources that don't mention the article subject seems pretty common with this editr. Doug Weller talk 12:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »StillWaitingForConnection (talk) 19:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC) Merge per other editr's rational who voted merge, especially Ritchie333's great comment. Too soon...
Click to read more »Neutral I expected this RFA to come in about 6 months because I felt that the editr would likely be ready then. The opposes above show I was right. I do hope...
Click to read more »a best-selling author are based on Amazon it would appear. As for the Editr's Choice Award, I can't find any indication as to what that actually is....
Click to read more »violation of NPA, which is policy. Anyway, it is frustrating to seen the same editrs vote delete for the smae exact reasons on articles which vary widely in...
Click to read more »anything in the deletion log. So deletion will involve evaluation by a human editr. - Mgm|(talk) 20:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC) I believe that free use, not...
Click to read more »«Talk»= 16:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC) Reply Will do this once the text editrs are complete.Dineshkannambadi 02:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC) SOCIETY--> I...
Click to read more »is grappling with how much expertise is it reasonable to expect from our editrs and I think he is grappling with the fact that we have different kinds of...
Click to read more »new combo. on the same page Also see User:70.226.161.198 ([8]) and the editrs to 2011 in LGBT rights. Also User:70.226.164.143 for immediate unexplained...
Click to read more »political boundaries keeps stub-sporting simpler without disadvantagine editrs, since if a place has a very stong link to one historical period it could...
Click to read more »February 2015 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Editr-warring by dynamic IPs and socks adding BLP violations. Please see also...
Click to read more »recent decision. But that is just my opinion as a middle-aged established editr with no axe to grind on the recent article debacle - just a very strong...
Click to read more »especially the edit summaries; methodically undoing the removal of G-Zay's editrs is a rather obvious sign. :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 14:49, 7 July 2013 (UTC) To...
Click to read more »great work, but its hella better than a lot that I've seen. I think the editrs bit off a bit more than she can chew -- it's a very complicated and fraught...
Click to read more »required in all cases, but I'd never dream of removing a tag when two or three editrs disagree, without having some overwhelming exceptional reason. 2) What do...
Click to read more »admin's page asserting " I strongly suggest you heed the complaints of other editrs about this individual", [ where Ratel accuses me of actually changing a...
Click to read more »«Talk»= 16:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC) Reply Will do this once the text editrs are complete.Dineshkannambadi 02:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC) SOCIETY--> I...
Click to read more »contradiction. The titles are different. Didn't you say you would allow the editrs to weigh in? Why are you continuing to fuel the debate and then claim to...
Click to read more »== Why was my page deleted? work for Melissa Harrington AKA MelissaMidwest and I was trying to make a page for her and before I was done with it you deleted...
Click to read more »reasonable, but it's also not what's happening with the Ayurveda article, where editrs are insisting that we must pretend that Ayurveda is a perfectly realistic...
Click to read more »recent decision. But that is just my opinion as a middle-aged established editr with no axe to grind on the recent article debacle - just a very strong...
Click to read more »pretend to be a victim".As you can see from my edit history, I'm not a big editr, I'm a frequent Wikipedia reader. I consider myself a newbie as I haven't...
Click to read more »academic notability guidelines especially WP:NPROF based on his academic work editr roles and reviewed publications. so, the article kept. (non-admin closure)...
Click to read more »article in question, in your case using the {{Edit COI}} template. See WP:EDITR for the full info about making edit requests. Athanelar (talk) 16:59, 21...
Click to read more »the scope of an edit request—it would require a discussion, and per WP:EDITR, edit requests to extended confirmed restricted topics by editors who are...
Click to read more »User talk:2600:1006:B038:21B4:7EAA:5EBE:208D:5979 Harassment towards many editrs. Pinging: @PhilKnight can you please revoke talk page access? Thanks. Myrealnamm...
Click to read more »article, not to specify that the article should be improved. If the filing editr thinks that the article is non-neutral, we can discuss changes to the article...
Click to read more »