Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
redirect, merge, or seek deletion of any draft. Shortcut WP:DRAFTIFYWP:DRAFTIFY The aim of moving an article to draft is to allow time and space for the...
Click to read more »curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Closed slightly early per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) ––FormalDude (talk)...
Click to read more »Song Contest 2022 was draftified for similar reasons. dummelaksen (talk • contribs) 16:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC) Delete or draftify. It is very concerning...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 23:54, 5 September 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. TheSandDoctor Talk 17:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Moved to draft for possible improvement if more significant reliable sources...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. which I will do, and salt the mainspace to enforce AfC/ Star Mississippi...
Click to read more »March 2022 (UTC) Draftify till it become notable as per WP:NFILM policy. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 23:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC) Draftify per WP:TOOSOON, with...
Click to read more » The result was Draftify (non-admin closure). Since there are available sources (non-English). The page was !voted to be draftified until it is ready...
Click to read more »09:00, 9 July 2022 (UTC) Draftify This article is WP:TOOSOON to be in article space. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:37, 9 July 2022 (UTC) Draftify/Delete, I concur with...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. When there are multiple reliable sources, send through WP:AFC for review...
Click to read more »development process, barely in pre-production. Per WP:NFF, it should be draftified as soon as possible. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:52, 13 November 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 14:19, 23 September 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. You can find it here Draft:Scooby-Doo! The Sword and the Scoob Missvain...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify and move protect using Extended confirmed protection. The article is now...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:01, 7 October 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. See Draft:Tom and Jerry: Cowboy Up! (non-admin closure) Extraordinary...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Valid ATD that preserves the work. If she doesn't win in November, it...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:32, 12 February 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 17:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 12:05, 7 June 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »trivial/routine so far. I had draftify-ed based on WP:TOOSOON but the page creator reverted it and also de-PROD'ed. I'd suggest draftify again until she makes...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Overall consensus is for the article to be moved to Draft namespace. The...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify.. Liz Read! Talk! 21:42, 2 September 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify as there's a reasonable chance it could meet GNG with some work. Star Mississippi...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 02:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 23:40, 17 November 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 12:34, 13 May 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 01:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify per WP:TOOSOON. (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 14:42, 18 December...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Editors appear to have consensus that this does not meet NFOOTY or GNG...
Click to read more »30 December 2022 (UTC) Draftify? referencing is a mess, needs a rewrite, but I think it's been around too long to be draftified. Oaktree b (talk) 15:38...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. You can find this article at Draft:Antonio Leone. Missvain (talk) 21:48...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 02:36, 20 August 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. The article can be moved back to go through the AfC process once notability...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Draftify. No consensus to keep or delete, but a strong suggestion to draftify, which should accommodate all. Randykitty...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 11:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Moved to draftspace until there is substantial coverage in reliable sources...
Click to read more »The result was delete. General consensus to delete. Some suggestions to draftify. I'm happy to restore to a user's draft space if requested, but nothing...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Mz7 (talk) 03:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify.. Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 12 November 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. You can find it at Draft:UY SCUTI Missvain (talk) 15:51, 13 June 2021...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. While there is a clear consensus not to Keep the article in its current...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify.. Liz Read! Talk! 00:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. The draftify votes are misguided, she won't become notable simply by playing, her club...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Closing earlier per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī (talk) 10:09...
Click to read more »October 2021 (UTC) Draftify given the potential of significant improvement. --Yoonadue (talk) 02:40, 7 October 2021 (UTC) Draftify per KidAd.4meter4 (talk)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 23:47, 12 January 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify to Draft:Playgendary. The draft should not be restored to the mainspace...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 23:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »me) 20:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Draftify Agree with Erik. 122.60.173.107 (talk) 03:06, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Draftify Agree with Erik as well. Also, if...
Click to read more »WP:ANYBIO passes notability. 116.68.98.175 (talk) 03:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC) Draftify Mcbath, why on Earth did you move this page from Draft space to main space...
Click to read more »(UTC) Draftify: Its time will come, but it isn't a high quality article yet. TimeEngineer (talk) 04:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC) I would support to draftify the...
Click to read more »risk of drawing any media attention if we draftify this article. – numbermaniac 08:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC) Draftify To enforce the consensus that Wikipedia...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. See Draft:Ravanasura. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:31...
Click to read more »the criteria for moving to draft space, per WP:DRAFTIFY, since it is not a new article. At WP:DRAFTIFY, it says to start a discussion at AfD for objecting...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:53, 5 August 2022 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 06:20, 19 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »Userify/Draftify, actually... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC) (OK, you guys won me over – changing !vote to "Userfy\Draftify"... --IJBall...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. – bradv🍁 20:12, 28 March 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 4 January 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 01:32, 20 March 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 23:41, 20 June 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. As it stands, there is little to no opposition to the notion that...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Fenix down (talk) 10:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 12:06, 3 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »Minnesota. Shellwood (talk) 07:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC) Weak Keep or Draftify. There is some coverage, such as this from The Philadelphia Inquirer; and...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 4 January 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was delete. I'm generally unwilling to draftify unless there's someone with the stated intent of working on the draft;...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Tone 06:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 13:42, 18 July 2022 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Star Mississippi 19:07, 27 November 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify to Draft:Carlo Romeo. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:39, 30 October 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »consensus. Three relistings and opinions are divided between Keep and Draftify. As a closer, I can't act on my own point of view so my only option is...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 19:29, 4 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 23:09, 29 July 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. I don't usually like draftifying unless someone has expressed an interest...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 12:40, 14 February 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. See Draft:Raghu Dakat. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:25...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:00, 4 December 2018 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Ok with draft - you can find it at Draft:Alegría (upcoming film). Missvain...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify.. Liz Read! Talk! 04:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 07:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Sandstein 19:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »currently notable, and absent any intent to work on a draft, the argument to draftify is weak. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:17, 2 January 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 00:10, 19 November 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. I agree with the drafitying effort presented here - it is available at...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was 'Draftify'. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. It seems a bit silly to close this less than 10 days out from release...
Click to read more »T·C 12:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC) Draftify until it can be sourced. Alvaldi (talk) 17:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC) Keep or draftify as this is a notable event which...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify – see Draft:Eric Ayiah. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:57...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 23:38, 23 March...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 07:59, 27 October 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify to Draft:Onai Chingawo. —ScottyWong— 19:50, 29 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Less Unless (talk) 20:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »talk ) 01:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC) Draftify per DGG. WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 13:16, 4 September 2020 (UTC) Draftify and salt name My concern is that the...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. There's consensus here that this article in its current form is not appropriate...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify (which already exists). Good faith, slightly confused creation. Excellent...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 23:44, 1 March...
Click to read more »Florida. Shellwood (talk) 07:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC) Weak Keep or Draftify. There is some coverage, such as the following: this, this, and this from...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 23:59, 13 March...
Click to read more »is notable. A theoretical WP:HEY is not a reason to DRAFTIFY (the most common reason to draftify is some form of TOOSOON). If sources are found that establish...
Click to read more »Jack N. Stock (talk) 04:08, 4 June 2018 (UTC) Draftify Just a bit WP:TOOSOON for WP:NFOOTBALL. Draftify is proper due to the high likelihood of his satisfying...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. I'll set the redirect to point to Frozen (franchise). (non-admin closure)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:59, 7 October 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify where this can be incubated and improved as Burton attains more playing...
Click to read more »Latin America, and Belize. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:05, 11 June 2022 (UTC) Draftify.--MonFrontieres (talk) 17:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Killiondude (talk) 03:29, 14 March 2018 (UTC) Jer Thorp (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »this. Alternatively, Draftify until he makes his NFL debut. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC) Weak keep or Draftify. Does have some coverage...
Click to read more »page. The result was draftify. I'm IAR-closing as draftify - it appears the page's creator made a good-faith attempt to draftify the article prior to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. You can find it at Draft:Archive 81. Missvain (talk) 23:27, 24 May 2021...
Click to read more »Actuarial Society. Userfy/Draftify: Problematic article for a long time, but might have some promise. I would propose to userfy/draftify and incubate it from...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 12:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:54, 16 June 2021 (UTC) Draftify per nom. Donaldd23 (talk) 11:25, 16 June 2021 (UTC) It has been moved to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:30, 27 November 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy draftify. Since this was moved into mainspace mistakenly, WP:SNOW applies. (non-admin...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:21, 26 October 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Legoktm (talk) 05:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. czar 21:32, 25 December 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Clear consensus that this isn't ready for mainspace. Vanamonde (Talk)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Participants should be aware that drafts can be speedily deleted if they...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Moving to draft space per rough consensus. Ad Orientem (talk) 06:00, 1...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 05:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. TheSandDoctor Talk 14:25, 3 November 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »Draftify, Article has no content so it needs work. Alex-h (talk) 13:53, 15 September 2020 (UTC) Comment Curious as to why everyone is saying Draftify...
Click to read more »15:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC) Draftify per nom. Fails WP:NFF. Also, WP:TOOSOON applies. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:47, 3 July 2021 (UTC) Draftify per nom and Donaldd23...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Bruxton (talk) 19:59, 19 November 2022...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify.. The article is now located at Draft:Tiger 3. North America1000 15:14...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) buidhe 17:32, 18 June 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Spartaz Humbug! 08:52, 14 December 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Moving to draft for improvement such as proving notability with extra...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 13:31, 14 July 2020 (UTC) AfDs for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was DRAFTIFY. You will find it at Draft:State of Consciousness. Missvain (talk) 23:25...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 21:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »19:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC) I threw in in with the Draftify idea, but Bearian makes a good point. If Draftify is the ultimate decision, do whatever is necessary...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) Geschichte (talk) 10:15, 22 December 2025 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Moved to draft namespace. (non-admin closure) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him |...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 04:02, 24 January...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify to User:BeanieFan11/Steve Finch. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:20, 27 April...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī (talk) 20:50, 26 October 2020 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 22:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. There's consensus that this is not yet suitable for the articlespace,...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 04:54, 12 June 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Draftifying. You can find the article at Draft:Khetsingh Khangar. Thanks...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Moved to Draft:Flybosnia. Killiondude (talk) 06:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. You can find it at Draft:The Baker (upcoming film) Missvain (talk) 15:49...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. There seems to be a consensus this article is not ready for the mainspace...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:10, 26 December 2018 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 12:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Will draftify/userfy on request. Also see no need to salt as this is the only time it's...
Click to read more »Kolma8 (talk) 20:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC) Draftify If the claim by the article creator is true, better to draftify this until the SIGCOV is released. Though...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Draftify as an author I ask to draftify to allow me work with it more. --VertyBerty (talk) 18:13, 20 December 2022 (UTC) Draftify. Needs work...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC) Draftify.--MonFrontieres (talk) 17:56, 25 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 10:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify.. Consensus seems to be that this version of the article is superior to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) PuzzledvegetableIs it teatime already? 13:41, 3 July...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 9 April 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »Vestrian24Bio 09:53, 1 December 2025 (UTC) Draftify – WP:TOOSOON. Svartner (talk) 11:24, 1 December 2025 (UTC) Draftify WP:TOOSOON Servite et contribuere (talk)...
Click to read more »turn up the necessary in-depth sourcing to show they pass WP:GNG. Was draftified in an attempt to assist the editor's creator, but was simply moved back...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Geschichte (talk) 11:22, 19 October 2025...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Star Mississippi 02:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »Fails WP:V, entirely unreferenced. Draftify pending references since there is likely inherent notability. WP:DRAFTIFY means I cannot do this unilaterally...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 03:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »yet enough of a thing in terms of coverage to merit an article. Can be draftified or userfied on request at WP:REFUND. (As an aside, under our current notability...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 12:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »draftify till we can figure out exactly what is going on.★Trekker (talk) 15:49, 31 January 2020 (UTC) Draftify The article was previously draftified by...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Owen× ☎ 19:36, 4 March 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NFF draftified once already but moved back with insufficient sources. In a before search...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Legoktm (talk) 16:33, 20 November 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. You can find the article at Draft:Melladaze. Thank you everyone for participating...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. You can find the article here: Draft:Ranjitha Menon. Missvain (talk) 17:25...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify to Draft:Ben Shelton (tennis). Consensus is that WP:TOOSOON applies. It...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 22:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 00:02, 28 January 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify to allow time for improvements. RL0919 (talk) 17:34, 15 January 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:28, 18 September 2019 (UTC) Draftify looks like a work-in-progress with an entry list but no qualifying/finishing...
Click to read more »India-related deletion discussions. ChunnuBhai (talk) 06:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC) Draftify The film is scheduled to premiere in a couple of weeks. Can be moved to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Star Mississippi 18:57, 14 June 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 00:26, 18 April 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify to AFC. (non-admin closure) ミラP 14:43, 29 February 2020 (UTC) [Hide this...
Click to read more »to draft but moved back without improvement by its creator. Should be draftified until it is properly sourced. Mccapra (talk) 19:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 12:53, 19 February 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC) Draftify? until released. -Cupper52Discuss! 10:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC) Draftify. It doesn’t have coverage currently...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. There was general agreement, even amongst many who wanted to retain the...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Will add an unnecessary disambiguation given that there is already a draft...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. You can find it at Draft:The Legitimate Wise Guy. Missvain (talk) 03:44...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:57, 6 March 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete per Czar's rationale regarding potential draftify in future. Daniel (talk) 11:56, 26 December 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 03:46, 6 April 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. General agreement that the article needs more work and sources with significant...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: Draftify to Draft:Anwar Mahmood Khan ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:24, 19 October 2018 (UTC) Wikipedia...
Click to read more »19 June 2021 (UTC) Draftify, although the article's subject may not meet WP:NACTOR. Miniapolis 20:44, 19 June 2021 (UTC) Draftify or delete. While references...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. bibliomaniac15 02:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 02:23, 30 June...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 23:51, 14 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. May be mainspaced if additional significant coverage in independent, reliable...
Click to read more »result was Draftify. Unanimous agreement that this doesn't belong in mainspace. Less clear which of the various alternatives is best, but draftify seems popular...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify to Draft:Team Fukushima. There's a consensus to send the article back to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Moved to Draft:St Andrews Angels -- RoySmith (talk) 04:56, 26 December...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 09:23, 9 November 2020 (UTC) Draftify - potentially notable as 'Maharaja Lakhan Pasi' does get a few hits. I...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Will restore to draftify on request if sources are available. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:43, 23 December 2019...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify as requested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC) [Hide this...
Click to read more »Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:51, 24 December 2022 (UTC) Draftify Network really can't have a 'best known for' program after merely two months...
Click to read more »the 21st. Given the duration of this AfD, it would be process wonkery to draftify this for four days to enforce consensus on NPOL. Star Mississippi 01:56...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:06, 29 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. SoWhy 10:25, 18 July 2018 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 00:44, 27 February 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. qedk (t 桜 c) 07:18, 21 February 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Star Mississippi 18:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 13:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: SNOW draftify to Draft:Festival of Education. (non-admin closure) Star walker (talk)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 00:32, 28 February 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »simply draftified, and allowed to expire in six months with a tombstone in draft space? Robert McClenon (talk) 22:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC) Draftify and...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Consensus is that there is enough content that this is likely worth incubating...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 05:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »article space when it was draftified, and it still isn't ready for article space", I agree there is enough concern to draftify until ready. -- Otr500 (talk)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. You will find it at Draft:Borrego (film). Missvain (talk) 23:25, 24 May...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 02:26, 2 August 2022 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Can be draftified on request at WP:REFUND. Sandstein 14:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC) [Hide this...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. This should not be restored to article space unless GNG is clearly met...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 10:23, 30 September...
Click to read more »February 2026 (UTC) Draftify per WP:TOOSOON. Zero appearances in his senior career. Kelob2678 (talk) 11:10, 4 February 2026 (UTC) Draftify – Sounds reasonable...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:47, 3 July 2022 (UTC) Draftify (to not say keep) – Found sources → [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] – Nominator,...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Please mind the below comments before restoring the article. czar 02:24...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 07:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify and redirect to Prithviraj Sukumaran. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 4 September 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Consensus for the article to be incubated in draftspace, pending further...
Click to read more »(UTC) Draft:EverlyWell (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Draftified twice, once after being told to use AFC, and declined twice. Resubmission...
Click to read more »from the views here that this player is not notable yet. Two editors said draftify. I am happy to restore this to a draft space if either, or any, editor...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Black Kite (talk) 22:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »already had been draftified to Draft:Sekala Brak. Just like they have recreated[3] Kepaksian Sekala Brak after it had been draftified (which is pretty...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Consensus that the film should stay as a draft until it is released. (non-admin...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Closing this as Draftify as this is the consensus but Ldm1954 is correct, if an interested...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Should the film become notable after being released, the content will...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. for incubation and potential improvement. Recommend going through AfC...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Randykitty (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Tone 12:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:19, 26 October 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »12:08, 14 January 2019 (UTC) Draftify Misplaced AfC submission. — CoolSkittle (talk) 15:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC) Draftify not currently suitable for mainspace...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. It isn't clear which articles editors wish draftified; anyone wishing to work on any of these in draftspace should contact me...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Tone 20:23, 15 August 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »I am content with draftify as an outcome here, although this is by far not the worst page I have seen. I prefer keep, but draftify is a good option if...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 06:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 20:16, 23 October 2025 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify.. Liz Read! Talk! 18:48, 4 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete and draftify. Draftification has already been done. Star Mississippi 03:07, 7 February...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:55, 13 June 2021 (UTC) Draftify or Delete. I prodded the article for similar reasons, but then deprodded...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. No need to let this play out, as the sole author has agreed for draftification...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Draftify was a reasonable option, but the page creator seems to prefer deletion...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. until such time as her nomination is confirmed as consensus is clear the...
Click to read more »is confirmed to happen. Nate • (chatter) 23:15, 12 December 2020 (UTC) Draftify-valid article in the future, but not for now. Wait until first major trailer...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. As a note regarding "when to move", I think the best time would be either...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 22:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 04:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify and merge to the existing draft, which I will carry out now. BD2412 T 03:11...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) buidhe 02:53, 20 February 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »keep or draftify and lets see what press does this film get after 11 November. Insight 3 (talk) 14:36, 1 November 2022 (UTC) Draftify:Draftify it now and...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify and move protect both of which I have done. Star Mississippi 03:12, 11...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Geschichte (talk) 12:28, 17 June 2025...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 03:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »and Iowa. Shellwood (talk) 23:21, 14 August 2025 (UTC) Draftify: Per WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL, draftify this until WP:SIGCOV emerges. Right now, this article...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 05:06, 18 November 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 19:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 21:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »07:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC) Draftify if the editor is willing to do more work on this, otherwise Redirect/Delete. I already draftified three new school articles...
Click to read more »nomination, for this draftify which this user like to do and do without permission will be suitable. Can draftify don't, clearly can't draftify do. This is no...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify.. Please submit to WP:AFC when you feel it is "main space ready". Liz Read...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. If it is cleaned up in short order, it can be restored to mainspace in...
Click to read more »was draftify. As far as I'm concerned, this counts as a delete, unless the article is improved and approved at AfC; however, I will generally draftify a...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) Servite et contribuere (talk) 07:01, 8 March 2026...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) — Benison (Beni · talk) 12:39, 1 December 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. The article is now located at Draft:Grey Elephant where it can continue...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify.. Liz Read! Talk! 01:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 03:33, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify.. Liz Read! Talk! 03:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »is appropriate, namely 1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created. Technical news The filter log now...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify.. Liz Read! Talk! 01:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 14 November 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »result was Draftify. A similar case to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hams That Couldn't Be Cured but the consensus here is to Draftify so I'll carry...
Click to read more »nom. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:58, 6 January 2022 (UTC) Draftify I suggest a draftify because they can submit after the release. Onmyway22 talk 06:46...
Click to read more »consensus to delete. Early in the discussion, things were trending towards draftify but after some improvements were made to the articles, sentiment was clearly...
Click to read more »weeks which may chart on Gaon. Abdotorg (talk) 17:18, 5 May 2021 (UTC) Draftify - The subject currently fails WP:NMUSIC, the article could be incubated...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify as created to soon.. (non-admin closure) Kingsmasher678 (talk) 01:14,...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Salvio giuliano 20:21, 2 March 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 01:00, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »would prefer to Draftify because another good source would really cement this article. casualdejekyll 19:26, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Draftify. It's received...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Can be draftified via WP:REFUND by anyone interested. Sandstein 13:26, 8 January 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Participants have unanimously agreed that it's WP:TOOSOON for mainspace...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 07:14, 21 April 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »too soon, as news is still breaking about this, it may be appropriate to draftify this article to see what develops. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:10, 19 January...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Sandstein 12:43, 30 May 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. The argument to draftify is weak if nobody intends to work on the draft, and nobody has expressed...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. There is a reasonable case that the pages do not resemble articles, and...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) South Korean theatrician and scholar. Draftified, moved back into mainspace. Offers absolutely no notability, fails WP:GNG...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:38, 13 May 2017 (UTC) Raluca Răducanu (edit |...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify.. Liz Read! Talk! 04:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 05:19, 3 June 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 18:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC) Keep or draftify - I'm OK with draftify. I guarantee if you have Persian readers we can have this article...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. With the possibility of the subject becoming notable in the near future...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Hey man im josh (talk) 21:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Moved to Draft:DBMaster. Nakon 00:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC) DBMaster (edit |...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) Geschichte (talk) 07:58, 7 August 2025 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. The article has been moved to draft space. Missvain (talk) 23:24, 20 December...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Vanamonde93 (talk) 02:43, 22 May 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:44, 15 February 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. It's not clear that draftify is even a legitimate way to close an AfD, per WP:AFD/AI...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (sorry that I didn't see this discussion sooner). Liz Read! Talk! 06:27...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Randykitty (talk) 10:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. All participants so far have expressed a willingness for this to be converted...
Click to read more »at this time after the most recent decision to draftify it. After two MFDs, we decided twice to draftify this rather than deleting it. It isn't clear to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Some say that "an article being in poor shape is not reason for deletion"...
Click to read more »to move this draft a second time to mainspace. Under WP:DRAFTIFY it may not be re-draftified unilaterally, so we are at AfD, something which could have...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify per WP:ATD-I. Moved to Draft:Illusion Museum Erbil without leaving a redirect...
Click to read more »minute of playing. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC) Draftify, ongoing career. I didn't create it until several years after, when the...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 16:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. to preserve history/attribution and so that improvements can be made now...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftified. Star Mississippi 02:41, 18 March 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 04:18, 9 April 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. The potential exists for this to find its way back to mainspace, but that...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. And anticipating a move back to main space in the future. Liz Read! Talk...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was delete. If someone wants to draftify it, just ask on my talk page. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftified by creator User:Pharos (non-admin closure). Raymie (t • c) 20:41, 1 April...
Click to read more »article, but if I was to vote I would vote to draftify. Onel5969 TT me 00:02, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Draftify would simply lead to nothing as I see that the...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Participants have unanimously agreed that this is WP:TOOSOON for mainspace...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 14:07, 6 March 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 15:23, 7 May 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 10:48, 3 February 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Black Kite (talk) 23:47, 9 September 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. czar 13:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 00:43, 7 September 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC) Good Day, pls kindly...
Click to read more »with no explanation.) Bsoyka (talk) 15:58, 26 March 2022 (UTC) Delete or Draftify no sources, no content. I would say merge with "LAR" article (if somehow...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Consensus favors moving this page into draft space. Ad Orientem (talk)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. There is consensus that this is a viable topic, but that the article is...
Click to read more »19 December 2023 (UTC) Draftify. Brand new article about a computer game from 1995. Sources may exist in print so let's draftify to give a chance to find...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:50, 30 November 2024 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC) Draftify - as the article was created in Apr 2020, it's likely too old to draftify through normal process but it can...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Owen× ☎ 23:37, 9 February 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Owen× ☎ 12:51, 25 May 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify based on discussion. (non-admin closure) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:12...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify.. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 06:36, 26 April 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī (talk) 15:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Salvio giuliano 18:13, 16 October 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 11:08, 5 December 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »this page. The result was Draftify. The page's author has indicated that they would be happy for the page to be draftified until it is worked up into...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Black Kite (talk) 14:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »(UTC) Draftify: It is an upcoming movie which means it doesn't have review from newspapers and also doesn't got or nominated for award so Draftify it and...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Draftify: as a potential future article. Clearly not ready as it stands now. ––FormalDude talk 08:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC) Draftify or delete....
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 19:07, 22 June 2024...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:18, 9 June 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 13:39, 5 September 2025 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 07:37, 3 December 2025 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 14:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 00:34, 1 February 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »will change this. If anyone feels strongly otherwise, I would support Draftify. // Timothy :: talk 19:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »notability criteria. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 08:21, 14 May 2021 (UTC) Draftify: I understand the arguments made above, but for an upcoming project, more...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Can be draftified on request at WP:REFUND. Sandstein 08:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC) [Hide this...
Click to read more »12:33, 15 January 2026 (UTC) Draftify per @SaTnamZIN. CabinetCavers (thou shalt speaketh) 13:02, 15 January 2026 (UTC) Draftify. In its present state it is...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 08:20, 17 January 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Can be draftified via WP:REFUND. Sandstein 08:56, 22 March 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 22:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »topics: Finance, History, and Business. jp×g 03:35, 22 July 2022 (UTC) Draftify. This is a real hobby that we should have an article about, but currently...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftified several days ago. Geschichte (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 00:04, 28 January 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. I see a consensus that this could be potentially suitable for mainspace...
Click to read more »20 August 2022 (UTC) Draftify for necessary improvements. Mccapra (talk) 20:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC) At this point oppose draftify and instead prefer cleanup...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 03:03, 30 November 2025 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »Europe-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC) Keep or Draftify - Regardless of whether it is appropriate to be live or not, some of the...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Draftify the subject is notable but the sourcing is too scant for mainspace. Mccapra (talk) 18:27, 1 December 2025 (UTC) Draftify per nom. and...
Click to read more »Originally tried to draftify this article since it was about an upcoming show, but it turned out the article was already draftified in the past and then...
Click to read more »notability guidelines has met BOVINEBOY2008 19:53, 19 March 2026 (UTC) Draftify The production lacks non-trivial coverage as required by WP:NFF. Kelob2678...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Move to draftspace for future improvement with better referencing when...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 18:36, 5 February 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 14:40, 17 October 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 21:30, 21 November 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 11:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Can be draftified / userfied on request via WP:REFUND. Sandstein 08:39, 26 November 2018...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Doesn't seem to be a clear indication that he meets GNG, but there has...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 03:54, 4 April 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Argentina. JTtheOG (talk) 23:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC) Draftify: I agree that this article should be draftified. More coverage needs to be sourced from independent...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. There is consensus that the article is currently unsuitable for mainspace...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested draftify (which is why I am down as the 'article creator') and then contested PROD...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 06:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. asilvering (talk) 01:20, 14 May 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) 11WB (talk) 20:51, 1 January 2026 (UTC) [Hide this...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 23:37, 4 June 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify.. Liz Read! Talk! 23:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Can be draftified or userfied via WP:REFUND (not by me). Sandstein 10:45, 23 January 2021...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. —(Notorious4life (talk) 22:54, 28 August 2020 (UTC)) Draftify {Creator} I 100% moved this too quick from a draft to an article. I feel...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify to User:Davey2010/Nu-Venture. Daniel (talk) 22:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »TWL) Previously draftified. WP:DRAFTOBJECT means it can only be sent back to draft by consensus. This is a formal proposal to Draftify on the basis that...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Consensus seems to be going in that way per WP:TOOSOON. That way it does...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. and draftify, which I will do momentarily. Star Mississippi 22:11, 23 January 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:59, 1 November 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Consensus is clear that improvement should happen in draft space Star...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Going with draftify as WP:Alternative to deletion. If it gets deleted in six months...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete or Draftify. WP:Autobiography. WP:TOOSOON. Article failing WP:GNG, WP:ENT. --Gpkp [u • t • c] 15:09, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Draftify Self-promotional...
Click to read more »(UTC) Draftify as per nom Poirot09 (talk) 07:42, 16 August 2026 (UTC) Draftify as per nom — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:50, 16 August 2026 (UTC) Draftify as per...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 03:23, 14 September 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 23:19, 24 November 2024...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Low traffic discussion, roughest consensus was to draftify, new sources can be added there and then...
Click to read more »Happy to draftify on request at my talk page if an interested editor wants to work on it, or alternatively any request at WP:RFU for a draftify should be...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 21 August 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »GiantSnowman 16:19, 23 August 2026 (UTC) Draftify – As plausible WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 20:36, 24 August 2026 (UTC) Draftify as per above discussion. Bearian...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 22:34, 5 January 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 23:46, 22 November 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 6 October 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »(UTC) Draftify per the draftify guidelines, as the creator has just admitted that they have a COI. Possibly (talk) 00:22, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Draftify per...
Click to read more »September 2023 (UTC) Draftify: WP:TOOSOON to have an article on this. I do believe it'd be best if this article was draftified until Miss Universe 2023...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. There's pretty clear consensus this isn't ready for stand-alone mainspace...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify per TOOSOON. — CactusWriter (talk) 23:39, 1 July 2026 (UTC) [Hide this...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 14:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »perhaps draftify is an option. Am open-minded eitherway. thanks Britishfinance (talk) 22:58, 21 February 2019 (UTC) Well I've changed to draftify for the...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:26, 7 December 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 12:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. asilvering (talk) 03:35, 9 February 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 07:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 23:35, 15 September 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. WP:TOOSOON (non-admin closure) CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 12:04, 15...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:58, 3 February 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify and salt.. Users who keep defying the consensus Risk sanctions so seek...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 14:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 06:42, 16 January 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »Astronomy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC) draftify A new stellar stream sounds important. But... There seems to be no one...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 08:01, 16 December 2025 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 23:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:01, 2 July 2020...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:52, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. asilvering (talk) 03:53, 6 May 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Given that one of the "keep" !votes explicitly remarks on the weakness...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. czar 21:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 22:33, 30 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Even the lone keep !voter acknowledges the need for a complete re-write...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. The article has been moved to Draft:Closed for Storm by its creator. ...
Click to read more »Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 11:52, 5 June 2022 (UTC) Draftify. She is young – it's simply WP:TOOSOON right now – but I am happy to add...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 03:27, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »or draftify? Right now, there is no consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC) Draftify -...
Click to read more »it to draftspace. But of course, you can draftify it only after the consensus indicates towards WP:DRAFTIFY, when the discussion will be closed by an...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. In anticipation that article has a potential to be a well developed article...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 19:53, 19 February 2026...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 04:11, 26 July 2025 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »significant coverage to warrant a standalone article, per WP:NFF and WP:TOOSOON. Draftify until the topic receives more coverage BOVINEBOY2008 10:46, 15 September...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Attribution is required, so I have moved the page to Draft:Kshanikam (2022...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 14:15, 25 January 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »to Spider) 15:50, 29 June 2025 (UTC) Draftify – WP:TOOSOON. Svartner (talk) 19:42, 29 June 2025 (UTC) Draftify not enough coverage right now, maybe in...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. There seems to be a rough agreement that though it currently fails TOOSOON...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 14:23, 11 June 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »Washington, D.C.. Shellwood (talk) 19:22, 7 July 2023 (UTC) Keep and Draftify Draftify per this discussion Snickers2686 (talk) 00:04, 9 July 2023 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was WP:DRAFTIFY. The article is now located at Draft:I Want You Back (film). North America1000...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) feminist (+) 07:43, 7 November 2021 (UTC) [Hide this...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify to Draft:Bootleg Multiverse. ‑Scottywong| [yak] || 04:59, 6 November 2020...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Basically a soft draftify. @Mccapra: (or anyone) you're welcome to strip this to its...
Click to read more »was Procedural close. Only non-sock opinion was to follow the prior AfD (draftify until release), which the creator agreed to. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬)...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep. Whether to draftify or rename can be decided by discussion on the article's talk page. Randykitty...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Spartaz Humbug! 23:41, 13 November 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »November 2018 (UTC) Draftify Will likely be notable in a few short weeks time. SportingFlyer talk 15:09, 26 November 2018 (UTC) Draftify AFL Women's starts...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. The article is now located at Draft:Lucas Sant. North America1000 11:10...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 14:48, 2 August 2023 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Star Mississippi 03:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. czar 04:01, 25 June 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »criteria would still be valid reasons for immediate deletion. We would draftify articles that meet current CSD criteria A1, A3, A7, and A9. These "criteria...
Click to read more »The result was keep. The consensus now leans towards a keep rather than draftify after the changes in the article. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison)...
Click to read more »(UTC) N*Delete or draftify. there is no apparent content worth an article. If it is suggested theremight be, it should be draftified until it is added...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »Sportspeople, Cricket, and India. Shellwood (talk) 19:59, 28 February 2025 (UTC) Draftify or Delete. Fails to meet WP:NSPORT. No significant coverage about the subject...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Toosoon Spartaz Humbug! 19:15, 14 December 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:53, 1 February 2020 (UTC) Draftify and notify the author. Unsourced article about a tiny settlement with no...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 00:18, 29 November 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 10:45, 3 February 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 03:56, 28 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. and suggest a history merge with the other draft if this is the one that's...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Star Mississippi 03:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 23:43, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify at Draft:Lagos State Pension Commission. ––FormalDude talk 06:57, 29 March...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:09, 14 August 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 11:27, 25 September 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. The drfitified version is at Draft:Littlest Pet Shop: A World of Our Own...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. While there may or may not be issues surrounding AfC, a six month, extendable...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 08:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »Washington, D.C.. Shellwood (talk) 18:57, 7 July 2023 (UTC) Keep and Draftify Draftify per this discussion Snickers2686 (talk) 00:05, 9 July 2023 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify (non-admin closure). Geschichte (talk) 03:16, 29 May 2026 (UTC) [Hide this...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. asilvering (talk) 02:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was draftify. ✗plicit 00:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 22:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...
Click to read more »