Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
case no single edit is disruptive but the overall pattern clearly is. Their edits are largely confined to talk pages; such disruption may not directly harm...
Click to read more »engages in behavior which is unacceptable for Wikipedia and causes a disruption. A disruptive user is primarily someone who is not attacking an article per se...
Click to read more »rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Note that it is possible to make a point, without disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate your point...
Click to read more »from impartial editors". See "Signs of disruptive editing: Rejects or ignores community input". WP:Disruptive editing. Wikipedia. 12 March 2012. "Consensus...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Disruption was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further...
Click to read more »rights from disruptive editors. We do it all the time. An editor does not even need to be participating in bad faith to be sanctioned for disruption; they only...
Click to read more »second. This is gone on sight. Uncle G (talk) 17:59, 5 July 2012 (UTC) Disruption marketing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »_of_Africa_Articles_(Broadly_Construed) User:TomStar81/Horn of Africa disruption I come before this board at wit's end. Repeatedly we have sought community...
Click to read more »fit the dictionary definition of disruption by having a tumultuous effect on editors and content, but are only disruptive to improving content if they come...
Click to read more »article/September 25, 2026 by Wehwalt (talk) 17:12, 28 July 2026 (UTC) There was a disruption on train services on the East–West Line (EWL) of the Singapore Mass Rapid...
Click to read more »academy, its libraries and archives - including at peer institutions - to "disrupt," dismantle and eliminate the systemic and institutional bias and inequity...
Click to read more »a huge encyclopedia. There's plenty to do, and instead of engaging in disruptive actions, it would be much more helpful to improve our project instead...
Click to read more »mentioned by news outlets which were discussing past incidents before this disruption. So I mentioned them. If another editor felt they aren't relevant, then...
Click to read more »used to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, not to punish users (see § Purpose and goals). Any user may report disruption and ask administrators to...
Click to read more »article "from IndiGo#IndiGo December 2025 service disruption on the lines of 2024 Delta Air Lines disruption, 2022 Southwest Airlines scheduling crisis; given...
Click to read more »their behavior, or if they find new creative ways to achieve the same disruption, the editor is likely gaming the system in bad faith. An editor gaming...
Click to read more »behavioral characteristics that disrupt productive editing. The duck metaphor is a good analogy because not all disruption is hatched from a paid or unpaid...
Click to read more »benefit of later newcomers to the past disruption. Explicitly identifying drama and centralizing it minimizes disruption to the community. Incivility or other...
Click to read more »and deem certain behaviors and actions as disruptive. In addition, they can also deem that the disruption, immediately upon its creation or presence...
Click to read more »info Consider providing just a summary of the behaviors and nature of disruption, key case pages (SPI/ANI/RFAR), and the names of current experienced users...
Click to read more »such as multiple article reversions, edit-warring, collusion, evasion, disruption, or other misuse. Using an alternate account to avoid scrutiny of edits...
Click to read more »damage or disruption to Wikipedia, not to punish users (see Wikipedia:Blocking policy § Purpose and goals). Any user may report disruption and ask administrators...
Click to read more »- a three hour train disruption is not notable.--Rpclod (talk) 04:31, 16 July 2015 (UTC) Would it be notable if this disruption is described as the country's...
Click to read more »Appropriate use of a block can help prevent imminent problematic conduct and disruption to Wikipedia. Do not block someone where you have, or may seem to have...
Click to read more »manner, attempting to find an acceptable resolution quickly, with minimal disruption. These suggestions may help you maintain civility in the face of difficulties...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) @GorillaWarfare: This is indeed what I mean. After May 5, if disruption continues, a new RFPP request can be filed.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 28...
Click to read more »prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. Blocks are lifted if they are not (or no longer) necessary to prevent such damage or disruption. You, as a blocked...
Click to read more »pages to specific groups of users. Pages are protected when there is disruption that cannot be prevented through other means, such as blocks. Wikipedia...
Click to read more »This page duplicates material better stated elsewhere. uc 18:43, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC) Delete. The page's name is of limited utility, the content quickly digresses...
Click to read more »protected and the level of disruption. It can also be helpful to review the article history to determine how long the disruption has been a significant problem...
Click to read more »see Singapore’s embarrassing metro disruptions; Experts call for more measures after North-South Line MRT disruption; 6 tips for surviving the next MRT...
Click to read more »development and community editing, and should be used only to prevent actual disruption. On the other hand, we do have {{In use}} tags, which can be used to alert...
Click to read more »and deem certain behaviors and actions as disruptive. In addition, they can also deem that the disruption, immediately upon its creation or presence...
Click to read more »disruption to the project. Editing a contentious topic Within contentious topics, you must edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting...
Click to read more »not exist are disruptive, not existing is, once again, not prohibited by policy. It is generally more helpful to point out the disruption in question,...
Click to read more »given 19 November 2022 Edits after DS warning 19 November 2022 Additional disruption after DS warning Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any Not applicable...
Click to read more »day, generally indicating edit-warring, vandalism, or other forms of disruption. False positives exist. Update the table now This table is generated by...
Click to read more »The AIV disruptor (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...
Click to read more »and try again; the only exception being editors who have caused serious disruption which has been judged likely to continue if nothing is done. If you have...
Click to read more »against something somewhat longer, I just think that is proportional to the disruption. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 17:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC) This request may be declined...
Click to read more »neutrally. Disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point and disruptive editing can provide the basis for blocking an editor. For long-term, low-level disruption, those...
Click to read more »self-destructs and implodes". Dire criticism of their business model and market disruption by Wikipedia aside, according to a March 2009 statement by Britannica...
Click to read more »Instead, you should consider the nature of the disruptive editing. If the edits relate to obvious disruption that is not properly defined as vandalism, it...
Click to read more »The intention of DS is to prevent disruption; if there is material on Wikipedia which is likely to lead to disruption, then it is appropriate for us to...
Click to read more »worsened disputes and increased disruption. Remember that sanctions may be more applicable under another heading (disruption, personal attack, tendentious...
Click to read more »to interrupt ongoing vandalism or disruption. Organizations should be encouraged to be involved in managing disruption caused by their users to avoid the...
Click to read more »cooperation I'm going to go ahead and add that text to the new entry). "Disruption" can only be judged historically, and then only by referenced sources...
Click to read more »he's obviously involved and is maintaining disruption, and should be warned. I could only avoid such disruption by completely avoiding Wikipedia. I'm almost...
Click to read more »to, it can still be considered disruptive. From Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Portals#Good faith and disruption: Inappropriate behaviour driven...
Click to read more »definition. Otherwise we will need "Disruptive engineer," "Disruptive accountant," "Disruptive lawyer," "Disruptive wine steward," etc.Also occurrences...
Click to read more »warring, gaming the system / abuse of process, wikilawyering, bludgeoning, disruption to make a point, "I didn't hear that" Editor intentions – single-purpose...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm. Reports of harassment or other behavioral disruption by other editors should be made by filing a report and starting a new...
Click to read more »extreme cases, even isolated personal attacks may lead to a block for disruption. Death threats and issues of similar severity may result in a block without...
Click to read more »project. In other words, personal attacks are disruptive to Wikipedia - and like other kinds of disruption, such as revert warring, a workable solution...
Click to read more »dissent regarding policies or guidelines inappropriately, such as through disruption or personal attacks, they may be blocked or given other sanctions. As...
Click to read more »shall be extended confirmed protected by default, without requiring prior disruption on the article. 1RR – subject to the normal exceptions, editors may not...
Click to read more »disrupt.digital: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...
Click to read more »anonymous and logged-in users, using autoblock and/or hard blocks, to prevent disruption. Administrators and bots are always exempt from such blocks (except for...
Click to read more »rapsor felonious ... What's going on? i have been falsfy accused of disruptive editing and my comments have been moved ... What would you like to change...
Click to read more »assume good faith. It does not matter how big the past mistake or the disruption was. What matters is how the editor has learned from it and grown from...
Click to read more »The important component of hounding is disruption to another user's own enjoyment of editing, or disruption to the project generally, for no overridingly...
Click to read more »block was 6 months, so one year block this time. Considering this is a disruption-only account with virtually no useful contributions, an indef topic ban...
Click to read more »has failed to control disruption on any particular article, there must be autoconfirmed editors that are causing the disruption. The best course of action...
Click to read more »used to protect Wikipedia from possible or further improper use, damage, disruption, or other activity that may breach Wikipedia's editorial policies. Once...
Click to read more »the record of gross disruption. The case here is crystal clear. Without spending time going over details of his past disruption and block log (his last...
Click to read more »and react to, each warning given. User blocks serve to prevent further disruption, or to protect Wikipedia, rather than to punish users. If a user stopped...
Click to read more »people think the entire thing is overblown. Others think that I'm such a disruption to the encyclopedia that I shouldn't be allowed to stay. I remind the...
Click to read more »other restrictions may be used to address repeated or particularly severe disruption of this nature, in order to foster a collaborative environment within...
Click to read more »their various own ways. If the user has a history of trolling and blatant disruption (such as long-term abuse or sock puppetry), you should use your best judgment...
Click to read more »investigate, prevent, or respond to: Vandalism; Sockpuppetry; Disruption (or potential disruption) of any Wikimedia project; and Legitimate concerns about...
Click to read more »more often act individually by baiting other members in an attempt to disrupt, and by causing other community members to waste time in dealing with the...
Click to read more »administrators should intervene to preserve content and prevent further disruption by blocking such editors. Users whose main or sole purpose is clearly...
Click to read more »on 1RR and disruption probation. This helped for a while, only to be later ignored (See AN/I reports: 1,2, 3). In addition to the disruption, evidence...
Click to read more »civil manner designed to contribute to resolution and to cause minimal disruption", and Giano II was placed on an editing restriction for one year. Franco-Mongol...
Click to read more »vigorously, such claims may end up prompting the community to sanction you for disruption. Ask for assistance, not punishment. It is not uncommon for it to quickly...
Click to read more »but they are just as harmful and disruptive. The principles of disallowing personal attacks and preventing disruption similarly discourage comments made...
Click to read more »others. Episodes and characters 2: A case involving alleged continuing disruption of articles concerning television series episodes and characters, following...
Click to read more »that unregistered users' sole contributions to Wikipedia are to cause disruption to articles and that they have fewer rights as editors compared with registered...
Click to read more »of this disruption, so admins should check and revert them. I am making this request to the admins to put an end to his purging and disruption of information...
Click to read more »block, topic ban, or full ban may be the only solutions that minimize disruption to the encyclopedia. Reasonable person Wikipedia:Contributing to complicated...
Click to read more »contribs) which had recently expired. Following complaints of persistent disruption and edit-warring at mathematics-related articles, Timotheus Canens filed...
Click to read more »other inappropriate behavior, such as disruption or vandalism, if their confusing username contributes to the disruption. Some accounts with usernames that...
Click to read more »Apologies for anyone who was frustrated or disrupted by the mailing. Future messages will be opt-in only. You can add your name here. AGK (talk · contribs)...
Click to read more »them from any article or talk page which they disrupt by inappropriate editing." Edit-warring is disruption by inappropriate editing. Summation I think...
Click to read more »the Wikimedia volunteer community to reduce the level of harassment and disruptive behavior on our projects. Over the past several years the Wikimedia Foundation...
Click to read more »difference between criticism and disruption: if, after review, it turns out that a person's actions are disrupting the Task Force, then that person should...
Click to read more »filed by Jehochman, who cited concerns about "tendentious editing and disruption" by a large number of editors on the "speed of light" article. Unusually...
Click to read more »Counter-Vandalism Academy. Goals view Our goals are: Protect Wikipedia from disruption. React to vandalism in progress. Inform active counter-vandalism users...
Click to read more »make a right. Disruption of any sort by one editor does not justify disruption by others. In such cases it is most likely that all disruptive editors will...
Click to read more »deal w/ disruptive editing. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 18:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC) But not adequate processes to deal with long-term disruption. Admins can...
Click to read more »highly problematic account User:Beserks. However after his 24h block, disruption subsided and Beserks adopted a more constructive approach (and low profile)...
Click to read more »(Originated by Erich 04:26, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC).) The time line for refining and considering this policy: Editing by all interested parties until about midday...
Click to read more »that that is irrelevant. There is no difference between civil disruption and rude disruption. Call me an idiot all one likes. I'm content to be an idiot...
Click to read more »you'll be able to test out in a safe environment without worry of causing disruption. Spending 15 or 20 minutes here may seem well worth it if it keeps you...
Click to read more »that Giano's pointy disruption seemed entirely focused on the IRC page, and only a short block would be needed to stem this disruption; and secondly, knowing...
Click to read more »Pakistan and Afghanistan) if such a sanction is necessary to prevent disruption; such extensions must be of a limited duration, not to exceed one year...
Click to read more »filed by Jehochman, who cited concerns about "tendentious editing and disruption" by a large number of editors on the "speed of light" article. The proposed...
Click to read more »filed by Jehochman, who cited concerns about "tendentious editing and disruption" by a large number of editors on the "speed of light" article. Unusually...
Click to read more »Skinny McGee allege that GuardianZ has engaged in sockpuppetry and general disruption on the article. He denies the allegations, and argues that Dionyseus and...
Click to read more »level of disruption, personal attacks, harassment, or outing. Passed 10 to 0, 02:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 12) Editors may be blocked for disruptive behaviour...
Click to read more »findings of deceptive (or misleading) conduct for the purpose of causing disruption. The reason for the adverse latter view being made by Skapperod or others...
Click to read more »contentious or poorly sourced changes. Semi-protection would help reduce disruption while still allowing established editors to contribute. Oswald Quinsley...
Click to read more »that have proved problematic. The goal is to reduce and prevent future disruption to the project. These topic areas are designated by the Arbitration Committee...
Click to read more »filed by Jehochman, who cited concerns about "tendentious editing and disruption" by a large number of editors on the "speed of light" article. Unusually...
Click to read more »contentious or poorly sourced changes. Semi-protection would help reduce disruption while still allowing established editors to contribute. Oswald Quinsley...
Click to read more »on what basis did you block? You used "disruption" as the reason. Please provide diffs for that disruption. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:02, 11 February 2008...
Click to read more »WP:FORUMSHOPPING, WP:FILIBUSTER and WP:BATTLEGROUND that causes considerable disruption in Balkan related topics. A dispute at Expulsion of Cham Albanians that...
Click to read more »deleted. Palestine-Israel articles: Yet another case relating to alleged disruption on Israel- and Palestine-related articles. As a result of the case, remedies...
Click to read more »other inappropriate behavior such as disruption or vandalism, if their confusing signature contributes to the disruption. Signatures that link to, but do...
Click to read more »not to disrupt it. The inclusion of links to discussions, including featured content nominations, in signatures has been found to be disruptive spamming...
Click to read more »principle: In cases where all reasonable attempts to control the spread of disruption arising from long-term disputes have failed, the Committee may be forced...
Click to read more »downwards spike in traffic lasting over an hour and almost three hours of disruption for readers around the globe. ← Back to Contents View Latest Issue 6 August...
Click to read more »The creation of the now-deleted Wikipedia:Mass revert, was intentional disruption to make a point ("If this is deleted, will SA, FM, et al., admit that...
Click to read more »the edits as "disruptive". Please - keep content disputes out of AE. Cheers. Collect (talk) 16:37, 25 June 2011 (UTC) Most disruptive editing centers...
Click to read more »Guide to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Disruptor (character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »dispute, not win a debate. Failure to keep this in mind often results in disruption of the dispute resolution process. As mentioned before, reporting editors...
Click to read more »those logs are public for good reason. The important part is the disruption - disruption is considered harmful. Final word: I just want to edit. Dyslexic...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. This behavior and conduct is undesirable, considered a form of disruptive editing, and is usually seen and reported as such when observed by other...
Click to read more »Wikipedia Expert Ian (Wiki Ed) Subject Chemicals that mimic hormones and disrupt animal development Course dates 2016-01-19 – 2016-05-05 Approximate number...
Click to read more »concerns, and not going to the "dark side" of WikiHate, bad faith, and disruption/flaming, it can be argued that these individuals serve a purpose. It could...
Click to read more »protection on pages that are subject to significant but temporary vandalism or disruption (for example, due to media attention) when blocking individual users becomes...
Click to read more »disruption to the project. Editing a contentious topic Within contentious topics, you must edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting...
Click to read more »people, it is used to prevent disruption. He is suffering. This is not something we want. I know he has a history of disruption, but he also makes good edits...
Click to read more »access, except in limited cases in which editing is restricted to prevent disruption or vandalism. Since its creation on January 15, 2001, it has grown into...
Click to read more »is specifically designed to address edit wars, content disputes, and disruption. During such protection, parties to any dispute about the page that is...
Click to read more »particular action against a particularly disruptive editor reasonable and appropriate in light of the disruption? Is the action "appropriate" and reasonable...
Click to read more »activity becomes disruptive to the community or gets in the way of the task of building an encyclopedia, it must be modified to prevent disruption. Shortcut...
Click to read more »The nomination was unquestionably made for the purposes of vandalism or disruption and, since questionable motivations on the part of the nominator do not...
Click to read more »any attempts at outing. Engaging in such activity will be treated as disruption and harming editor privacy. In cases where participants may need to discuss...
Click to read more »an AE sanction requires only that a reviewing admin finds sufficient disruption to warrant action and is not an endorsement of every individual claim...
Click to read more »forget that making a point does not imply disruption (you need to disrupt to make a point, not make a point to disrupt! :-P), you are probably infected. And...
Click to read more »disruptive. While one could argue that we cannot definitively prove the covert disruption, given the overt disruption I believe the covert disruption...
Click to read more »takes steps to stop his disruption of this article prompted the response that he intends to continue and expand his disruption to resist the userfication...
Click to read more »evidence. Stronger claims, such as about disruption, require even more evidence to show a pattern of disruptive actions, rather than just casting several...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was redirect to TechCrunch#TechCrunch Disrupt. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:09, 19 July 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »happens when a disruption in one area goes on too long. The disruption becomes so widespread that it attracts individuals who are disruptive in other areas...
Click to read more »the dispute resolution process. Most such cases have dealt with limited disruption from a small number of editors, but in a few cases the committee has interpreted...
Click to read more »consider it disruptive. Kurt knows some people consider it disruptive, yet he has carried on regardless - to me is increasingly looking like disruption of the...
Click to read more »nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false...
Click to read more »needs to do to halt disruption, there is no reason for him not to use it, old RfC be damned". We're all aware of the disruption that has surrounded this...
Click to read more »violating the principles of this policy, may be treated as the same level of disruption as editing under multiple registered accounts. When editors log out by...
Click to read more »however, many of these disruptive socks first appear to be genuine editors and I would really not be able to prevent such disruption with this ban (which...
Click to read more »and disruption, I think we could forgo the topical-ban and the pagemove restrictions. Of course, ignoring the mentor or causing further disruption would...
Click to read more »action against vandals and stop disruption, not silence political opposition in an effort to prevent disruption. Disruption is subjective and falls under...
Click to read more »the contentious nature of this subject and were cautioned that to avoid disruption, they must adhere strictly to fundamental Wikipedia policies. ← Previous...
Click to read more »causing disruption on a single page or a group of pages, e.g. edit warring on one article or breaching a topic ban on some page. As long as the disruption is...
Click to read more »well-past time for the community to address these types of issues. Disruption is disruption. With new editors, we should accord them good faith and earnestly...
Click to read more »barnstars and a legion of friends-and-relations; nevertheless, disruption is disruption, tendentious editing is tendentious editing, and harassment or...
Click to read more »somehow stop the disruption. If we have evidence now that two users are disruptive when they encounter each other, and they are disruptive when editing articles...
Click to read more »returned and created an alternative account, which some allege was used for disruption. This was then blocked, and he used his sysop tools to unblock it, causing...
Click to read more »to disruption. --Al Ameer son (talk) 05:16, 2 April 2009 (UTC) Thank you for your thoughtful comments. The key phrase is "not return to disruption". No...
Click to read more »for having raised multiple ANI reports on the subject). Meanwhile the disruption has continued, as evidenced by the numerous diffs collected by interested...
Click to read more »Continuing to behave in a way that people are telling you is inappropriate or disruptive leads to problems. For you, for the community, and for Wikipedia. "Don't...
Click to read more »made by an anon. The user was warned on their talk page. Nevertheless, disruption of Wikipedia continued--the user continued to make edits that could not...
Click to read more »was about what you meant by "if his disruption resumes." What disruption? Any user may be blocked for disruption reasonably foreseen, but it is important...
Click to read more »the case to examine user conduct and to attempt to reduce the level of disruption around the topic on Wikipedia. There have been a number of articles about...
Click to read more »a person for just one instance of disruption, if they have other non-disruptive edits in their history. Disruption has to rise to a much higher level...
Click to read more »User:Francis Schonken had a history of disruption. That is true. (It also true that Mathsci has a history of disruption.) It is true that I chose to ignore...
Click to read more »filed by Jehochman, who cited concerns about "tendentious editing and disruption" by a large number of editors on the "speed of light" article. Unusually...
Click to read more »fit the disruption and indefinite blocks followed by discussions of long term solutions prior to unblock certainly fit this current disruption.Griswaldo...
Click to read more »1RR restriction in this topic area remains in force, and that further disruption related to this case may result in the topic ban or other remedies being...
Click to read more »"following an editor to another article to continue disruption... the important part is the disruption." Look at emergency contraception, Depo Provera, Barrington...
Click to read more »least invasive method to repair the disruption" What disruption? He still does not get that there was no disruption until he broke rollback rules and acted...
Click to read more »· bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Likely LTA. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 00:38, 8 August 2026...
Click to read more »becomes disruptive, he can be banned from specific articles. Bucketsofg 00:48, 20 December 2006 (UTC) Any editor may be blocked for disruption, and I think...
Click to read more »(WP:NOTTHERAPY), they're about stopping the offender's disruption. In this case, the disruption was personal attacks. Levivich 22:28, 18 September 2021...
Click to read more »matters first. Disruption in the mainspace is always more disruptive than disruptive on the talk page, given that such mainspace disruption can compromise...
Click to read more »politely but firmly exclude from the portions where conflict occurs. If disruption continues after educating the user on how Wikipedia works, such users...
Click to read more »original research may be sanctioned. Merely because disruption involves sources does not make said disruption a "content issue" outside of administrative reach...
Click to read more »01:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC) If there is disruption on the article, it must be dealt with just like any other disruption. No evidence has been presented so...
Click to read more »sanctions may be taken against editors for various forms of intentionally disruptive behavior. These include blatant forms of vandalism, spamming, creation...
Click to read more »way to prevent disruption. Blocked users should understand the reasons for the block and convince administrators that they won't disrupt the project if...
Click to read more »meant to document pranks, not have pranks performed on them. To minimize disruption of Wikipedia, please keep the following rules in mind if you consider...
Click to read more »past edits or conduct, evade or circumvent blocks or sanctions, or cause disruption to the project). Additionally, your account creation request attempt(s)...
Click to read more »degree of disruption scuro causes is quite difficult unless one is to read over hundreds or thousands of their posts to grasp the level of disruption. However...
Click to read more »seeing enough disruption in Canada Jack's edits to merit any action unless there is a clear indication that they will behave disruptively in future. @Canada...
Click to read more »your reverts to exact three reverts. This is also disruption, and a block will prevent that disruption. Navou banter 23:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC) :::I've...
Click to read more »(UTC) Wikipedia:Hate is disruptive (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This essay itself, ironically, is disruptive, as people have been quoting...
Click to read more »forget that making a point does not imply disruption (you need to disrupt to make a point, not make a point to disrupt! :-P), you are probably infected. And...
Click to read more »Jimmy Wales backs a declaration to disrupt the educational materials market, just as open source software has disrupted proprietary software, by introducing...
Click to read more »have warned him on his Talk page that he is being disruptive, and he can be blocked for disruption. If he continues his behavior, I will block him. User:Zoe|(talk)...
Click to read more »cause for disruption, so it would need to be part of your topic ban. Equazcion •✗/C • 13:31, 8 Mar 2008 (UTC) User:Bsharvy is the disruption of that article...
Click to read more »other editors allege that Rex has also engaged in a certain amount of disruption, and shows a certain Dutch nationalist bias. As a result of the case,...
Click to read more »technologies as "disruptive" is not support by the citations, and is WP:OR & WP:POV. (Besides the printing press was pretty disruptive in its day....so...
Click to read more »Blocks, however, are intended to stop disruption; I frankly don't think that Kittybrewster's behavior is disruptive enough to warrant a one week block at...
Click to read more »according to a post on the Wikimedia blog. As predicted, there was minimal disruption during the switchover period. Translation memory upgrade: Translatewiki...
Click to read more »Wikimedia Foundation staff are remote, and so we do not anticipate a major disruption in our work. That said, we’re continuing to evaluate and take necessary...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point Wikipedia:Disruptive editing Wikipedia:Tendentious editing Wikipedia:Forgive...
Click to read more »replication lag and periods of total downtime, have caused considerable disruption to the Toolserver's usual functions. Those functions are highly valued...
Click to read more »administrator. Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks. The user 19999o's edits on the page...
Click to read more »the account for disruption and legal threats. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 12:44, 13 May 2011 (UTC) User is blocked now for disruption. I'd guess this...
Click to read more »contributions but is also apparently somewhat disruptive. ++Lar: t/c 15:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC) The disruption has come from admins who havent read the...
Click to read more »felt they were satisfied that the account was not compromised and the disruption had ceased. Malik Shabazz may request to be resysopped at any time. Arbitration...
Click to read more »especially by unregistered users. Open proxies allow malicious users to cause disruption that is more complicated to stop. This policy causes difficulty for editors...
Click to read more »makes them find another disruption honeypot. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC) There is no evidence of substantial disruption in, or out the banned...
Click to read more »keeping the number of open cases at two. This case involves accusations of disruptive editing against Rich Farmbrough. Specifically, concerns have been raised...
Click to read more »appropriate. A user threatening a legal action on their talk page is limited in disruption. They should not be prevented from using their talk page until attempts...
Click to read more »block log) This user is subject to a restriction on disruptive editing and yet has now engaged in willful disruption at ghost light directed against myself. He...
Click to read more »GoldenRing, in what way, given this editor's level of disruption? Really, how do you propose this disruption stop when this editor continues to edit war across...
Click to read more »(including biographies) concerning India, Pakistan and Hinduism. Repeated disruption has been caused owing to their edit-warring over script transliterations...
Click to read more »project. Just ban them for three months and go up from there if the same disruption resurfaces on their return to editing. JbhTalk 20:15, 2 October 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »operate for years (even with blocks) with complete focus and energy on disrupting Wikipedia, while average-Joe vandal might insert "sucks dick" into a biography...
Click to read more »'disruption of Wikipedia', a reason described on our Blocking Policy as controversial, and Wiglaf failed to present evidence of Molobo's disruption other...
Click to read more »further discussion when a clear consensus has already been found can be disruptive to the process. However, before adding a wikilink to this essay on an...
Click to read more »discussion and assumptions of good faith than to accusations of disruption. Truly disruptive editors eventually exhaust the patience of the community through...
Click to read more »continued one-on-one communications after being asked to cease; Sustained disruption of discussion; Deliberate “outing” of any person’s identity without their...
Click to read more »closed it yesterday as an obvious bad-faith disruption; he has this morning reopened it to continue the disruption [3]. It will doubtless end with no consensus...
Click to read more »taken if editing edit filters as even the smallest mistake can cause huge disruption. See Wikipedia:Edit filter for the tool's guideline and...
Click to read more »of POV-pushing and double standard [54] accusing HM of bad faith and disruption [55] accusation of tag teaming [56] accusing M.K of "instead of mindlessly...
Click to read more »editing while intoxicated. None of these is an excuse for disruptive editing, and disruption has to be faced with blocks and bans. I could see, as the...
Click to read more »ideas wherever s/he sees fit, but sometimes seems to be disruption for the sake of disruption (a way of wasting my time), like here. Repeats continually...
Click to read more »edits and much less disruption. Rare targets include American and British heavy metal bands, which are generally not subject to disruption. Articles listed...
Click to read more »purposes of disruption on on site drama. That is to say, the abandonment of a previous good account, in favor of using this account soly for disruption, does...
Click to read more »articles. Episodes and characters 2: A case involving alleged continuing disruption of articles concerning television series episodes and characters, following...
Click to read more »disruption caused. He has been warned many times - not with templates but with comments left on talk pages. How would you suggest further disruption to...
Click to read more »editors are blocked or banned, sometimes indefinitely, due to their own disruptive behaviour or other reasons. Others may retire from the project, either...
Click to read more »administrators' noticeboard has authorised the use of general sanctions to curtail disruption related to systems of measurement in the context of the United Kingdom...
Click to read more »Noticeboard exists for the more extreme cases of harassment and general disruption towards Wikipedia. It doesn't exist for you to run off and complain because...
Click to read more »experienced disruption in other areas (the closest I've come to is Talk:COVID-19_pandemic#Airborne_Transmission, but that's not really disruptive, just a...
Click to read more »enforcement from another administrator). Especially, but not only, in regard to civility, disruption, and compliance with Wikipedia policy and guidelines....
Click to read more »incontrovertible proof. They are being disruptive (and yes, i know the difference between disagreeing with me and genuine disruption), and wasting a ton of time...
Click to read more »returned and created an alternative account, which some allege was used for disruption. This was then blocked, and he used his sysop tools to unblock it, causing...
Click to read more »of me for disruption was considered to be in bad faith by the closing admin. Nevertheless, you repeat the bad-faith accusation of disruption above. This...
Click to read more »much disruption as when they edit the mainspace. --David Shankbone 17:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC) Please note that I responded to the claims of disruption in...
Click to read more »is enough, and disruption is disruption. Our goal (at ANI) is to deal with and eliminate disruption, and the editor is clearly disruptive and this has been...
Click to read more »opinion. This is often unrelated to the disruption at all; if an editor with a majority opinion was to edit disruptively, they would almost certainly be sanctioned...
Click to read more »page. --Taelus (talk) 19:33, 28 June 2011 (UTC) Air travel disruption → Air travel disruption after the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption (links to redirect...
Click to read more »time to boot tendentious, disruptive editors off the project. I’ve had ample experience dealing with Bulldog123’s disruption. He has a long and distinguished...
Click to read more »or continued use of new, disruptive accounts where other methods (such as semi-protection) have not controlled the disruption. This provision does not...
Click to read more »people edit "his" articles, so he reverses correct information. This is disruption, and should be accordingly treated. Ninguém (talk) 00:44, 19 June 2009...
Click to read more »in fact highly dangerous when protecting WikiRealm from aggressive and disruptive editors. WikiSharks are often misunderstood, being feared and wrongly...
Click to read more »returned and created an alternative account, which some allege was used for disruption. This was then blocked, and he used his sysop tools to unblock it, causing...
Click to read more »Geordies, on the basis that the disruption to the article is so bad it warrants deletion. (I believe currently the disruption is due to only one user, the...
Click to read more »worked on for Afd disruption. If there is evidence that Justinm1978 did this to irritate or anger Miranda then it would be disruption, but I haven't seen...
Click to read more »step under 3RR in dozens of article in a single day is a general disruption. In disruption blocks the admin's discretion is allowed. This whole thing started...
Click to read more »had been recently blocked for disruption and reviewed enough of the other contributions to conclude they were disruptive too. I revealed the connection...
Click to read more »and potential disruption and abuse. The tool is to be used to fight vandalism, to check for sockpuppet abuse, and to limit disruption of the project...
Click to read more »is just profoundly ridiculous, and will be met with blocks for general disruption if necessary. Just leave the header as is and counter the points they...
Click to read more »causing large-scale disruption over a very short period; advance identification of such accounts prior to their being used for disruption, without alerting...
Click to read more »Special:PrefixIndex/Wikipedia:Don't Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point Wikipedia:Don't delete the main page Wikipedia:Don't...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) also placed under ECP for 6 months since disruption continued at/moved to that article. Abecedare (talk) 17:39, 20 May 2020...
Click to read more »This is where we get alerted to disruption and try to fix the problems, not encourage them by denying that the disruption occurred. Continuing to try to...
Click to read more »order of the things you should try: Block the spammers, provided the disruption is limited to one or a few users, and they've received sufficient warning...
Click to read more »what they are doing is wrong, then insulting them is likely to create disruption unnecessarily. This is similar to trolling. Keeping back from insulting...
Click to read more »would be rewidened if the disruption resumed (See the original motion). On reviewing the AE thread, it was clear that disruption had resumed; after leaving...
Click to read more »vandalism/disruption, then what makes you think you have a right to an opinion on it while the IP does not? If it's not a question of vandalism/disruption but...
Click to read more »labelled as trolls when they cause disruption – but often their intentions are pure; they're not being intentionally disruptive. The odd thing about trolls is...
Click to read more »the disruption in practice is debatable, but can't be really known without first trying. As I've said above, for moderately damaging disruption as on...
Click to read more »JoshuaZ and Consumed Crustacean have accused Poor of POV pushing and disruption; Poor has not introduced evidence in the case. Ed Poor was party to two...
Click to read more »when it reaches the level of personal attacks, outing, harassment or disruption, as described in those policies. The previous enforcement proposal has...
Click to read more »continuing his general campaign of disruption? It's clear he's fairly determined to continue sockpuppeteering with disruptive and spammy intent: see http://en...
Click to read more »initial explanations at talk Interfase returns an original and possibly disruptive phrase that few hours ago was added by him [209] Diffs of previous relevant...
Click to read more »engaged in either disruption nor edit warring. My block here was meant to be a signal, more than anything else, to SqueakBox that his disruption and edit warring...
Click to read more »In this instance, I gave Walter a roadmap in case the disruption resumed ("If the disruption resumes, request semi-protection"), which is more than is...
Click to read more »deletion Wikipedia:Consensus § Consensus can change (policy) Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (guideline) Wikipedia:Don't be ashamed...
Click to read more »for the purposes of protecting Wikipedia against actual and potential disruption and abuse. Edit filter manager Edit filter manager is a user group that...
Click to read more »before he picked up his disruption. As to my involvement, I've just made a few edits in an attempt to check Steve's POV and disruption at ANI. He was forum-shopping...
Click to read more »agree with) can and will be construed as disruption, and blocks may and will be meted out to stop said disruption. —Kurykh 02:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC) AfDs...
Click to read more »retention. Blocks and topic bans are intended as remedial actions to stop disruption but at times tend to appear punitive and magisterial, which exacerbates...
Click to read more »articles. Episodes and characters 2: A case involving alleged continuing disruption of articles concerning television series episodes and characters, following...
Click to read more »reporter. Thus, reporting to ANI as a disruptive editor may be better for the encyclopedia, as one's disruption will be noted and the user dealt with...
Click to read more »They are applied for cross-wiki vandalism, spamming, or other types of disruption, or to block open proxies. Blocks can be applied to accounts, IP addresses...
Click to read more »procedures, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Boothy443/Workshop#Disruption_of_Wikipedia_to_illustrate_a_point, Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitratio...
Click to read more »revoked by blocking, banning or otherwise restricting people who damage or disrupt Wikipedia. Over time, editors may acquire an informal reputation based...
Click to read more »changes patrol and WikiProject Spam). The important part is the disruption — disruption is considered harmful. If "following another user around" is accompanied...
Click to read more »a trolling situation. A troll's motive is to cause disruption, anger, and drama. If no disruption, anger or drama occurs, then a troll is not satisfied...
Click to read more »was zero disruption, no gray there. "mindless admins" is an attack against admins who are people. Some disruption is more than zero disruption. The community...
Click to read more »16 January 2011 (UTC). Moonraker2 states above that he is moving his disruption of my statement to this page at my suggestion on his talkpage. Savour...
Click to read more »for disruption, I do not think it too much to ask to see what she thinks was disrupted. The editing situation was calm. Where was the disruption? I am...
Click to read more »of it first, just in case. On behalf of the WMF, we apologize for the disruption—in an ideal world we'd be able make to this switchover without editors...
Click to read more »September 2021 (UTC) You know very well that your recent disruption, including the disruption that resulted in your previous block, was at an article related...
Click to read more »the case of excessive or continuous disruption from a user or specific IP. It is important to remember that disruptive editing is not vandalism. Although...
Click to read more »Sometimes the user is immature and ends up being blocked for disruption. If they are not disruptive, personal information may be removed and the user counseled...
Click to read more »it like it is". While editors who consistently engage in disruptive editing are disruptive editors, and editors who consistently vandalize are vandals...
Click to read more »and rewrote it almost completely, despite the banned user's continued disruption attempts. The article was promoted to FA status in February 2008, adding...
Click to read more »but may be considered uncivil and perhaps even disruptive. Even without the consideration of disruptiveness and uncivility, the purpose of discussions of...
Click to read more »article nor the topic are the cause of the disruption. Removing an editor from it will not mitigate that disruption and only serve as a punitive measure. EvergreenFir...
Click to read more »the various policies we have been citing. I say 'disruption' because one of the signs of disruption is not answering questions and Dave has been asked...
Click to read more »This poll was to decide whether we should adopt Wikipedia:Dealing with disruptive or antisocial editors - Version 1. The poll ran from midday, UTC, 25 July...
Click to read more »and his rather disruptive attitude. The only evidence against Cityside189 was that s/he was a new editor caught up in the disruption caused by TEoATW's...
Click to read more »remedy was passed noting that the Committee expected that the disputes and disruption underlying the case would cease. The remedy also noted that in the event...
Click to read more »to inflate into some kind of notable disruption." I reject your attempt to trivialize and smear as a disruption, my evidence-based complaint of personal...
Click to read more »Nomination is obvious attempt at disruption by SPA concerned with GNAA. This is a final warning to BallPark2 that further disruption of this type will result...
Click to read more »(1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. Article talk pages where disruption occurs may also be managed with the stated restriction. Discuss this newsletter...
Click to read more »continue to disrupt Wikipedia even after they've been formally disinvited. (see: This link for only one such editor's path of disruption). What I think...
Click to read more »very many warnings about this. This is disruptive editing. I've blocked him for 24 hours. If the disruption does not stop after this, escalating blocks...
Click to read more »I get a ruling as to whether this edit to an RFA was disruption? Assuming the edit was disruption, how long would the block be? And what do I need to do...
Click to read more »in 2008 was not necessary to prevent disruption. I don't see how a block today is necessary to prevent disruption. Unless Wikipedia is the kind of place...
Click to read more »her password for several accounts, either to cause disruption, to encourage others to cause disruption, or to disclaim responsibility for her edits [18]...
Click to read more »authorship question reflect a miserable history of talkpage misuse and disruption. Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their...
Click to read more »BErD's work, I suspect that the disruption outweighs the assistance, and that it is time to put an end to the disruption. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:44...
Click to read more »disruption, it is totally inappropriate to block and editor just to get him to respond to talk page messages. My second point was that the disruption...
Click to read more »discourage any future disruption.-Andrew c [talk] 00:59, 23 May 2008 (UTC) Please apologise immediately for characterising my edits as disruption. Sarah777 (talk)...
Click to read more »"Disruptive editors sometimes [use] several practices when disrupting articles:... Their edits are largely confined to talk-pages, such disruption may...
Click to read more »Mouse got banned soon and the duel ended. The same sock then again caused disruption which was again supported by Kautilya3 which again led to a lengthy discussion...
Click to read more »appeared on May 21, 2007. This week's WikiWorld comic uses text from "Disruptive technology". The comic is released under the Creative Commons Attribution...
Click to read more »there's too much of these little CIR issues which ultimately build ups into disruption especially with the amount of resistance they provide towards changing...
Click to read more »here is disruption. Not one sided, there's some to go around, but it seems like things are escalating. Don't answer disruption with more disruption. That...
Click to read more »As for disruptions, SMcCandlish tends to confuse disagreeing with him with disruption. You will see that I'm the one trying to avoid disruption: a) When...
Click to read more »engaging in the kind of disruption is virtually impossible to deal with. Reverting without consensus or references, disruption on the talk pages, and even...
Click to read more »as me for the disruption at TVR Cerbera.U1 quattro TALK 01:10, 12 August 2020 (UTC) they are just as responsible as me for the disruption is not an acceptable...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) 22) When all reasonable attempts to control the spread of disruption arising from long-term disputes have failed, the Committee may be compelled...
Click to read more »wants to prevent disruption and any actions taken against editors are meant to stop current disruption and prevent future disruption. But I still think...
Click to read more »described as a violation of don't disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point...Following an editor to another article to continue disruption (also known as wikistalking)...
Click to read more »returned and created an alternative account, which some allege was used for disruption. This was then blocked, and he used his sysop tools to unblock it, causing...
Click to read more »"banned from any article or subject area which he disrupts by aggressive biased editing". The disruption is mentioned by several and is clear; there is clear...
Click to read more »As Yoda (almost) said, "Winning leads to drama, drama leads to disruption, and disruption leads to blocking." Ian.thomson (talk) 23:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »on disruption by others. To be clear: Censei -- you should be ashamed for trying to take the good, productive efforts of an editor to stop disruption, and...
Click to read more »dispute. Episodes and characters 2: A case involving alleged continuing disruption of articles concerning television series episodes and characters, following...
Click to read more »changed. You and Hesperian use the catch-phrase "disruption" a lot, but what exactly am I disrupting other than Hesperian's complacency? As for "standing...
Click to read more »a user disruption issue, and a IDHT issue. If the user will not accept En-Wiki style, they need sanctioning in order to stop their disruption. The sanction...
Click to read more »Scepter's reaction to the disruption, can we please separate the two issues? Stevevertigo is causting widespread disruption, whatever Scepter's alleged...
Click to read more »blocks you for edit warring and disruption, potentially unintended disruption and edit warring but it is still disruptive. Blackmane (talk) 01:32, 12 October...
Click to read more »Hindutashravi's edits, all I see is disruption, disruption, and disruption. I'll block Hindutashravi for 1 month; if he continues to disrupt en.wikipedia after the...
Click to read more »it, editors can be blocked for disruption whether they are deliberately vandalising or unintentionally causing disruption. To me, it looks like vandalism...
Click to read more »dispute. Episodes and characters 2: A case involving alleged continuing disruption of articles concerning television series episodes and characters, following...
Click to read more »you a shifting to another pretext for the action. The disruption policy. Which is it, disruption or vandalism? And you've dodged my basic point and your...
Click to read more »has been repeatedly warned about their disruptive AFDs, tag-bombing, talkpage rants etc etc and yet the disruption still continues, The lack of English...
Click to read more »common unwanted content such as spam, copyright violations and other disruption to Wikipedia – while allowing good faith new users to draft articles and...
Click to read more »by you, battleground disruption, and not convincing others per WP:REHASH, I'm asking you to refrain to prevent ongoing disruption on mass AfDs. Can you...
Click to read more »in this essay generally violates other guidelines and policies such as disruption or canvassing (which are guidelines). A group of editors acting in unison...
Click to read more »It's shameful and makes a mockery of the project. It's not just disruption, but disruption beneath layers, cloaked by the protection of WP:AGF. I see no...
Click to read more »user is probably not malicious, though maliciousness is not needed for disruption. I do think that a greater understanding of the limits of article talk...
Click to read more »off-wiki promotion of disruption of on-wiki matters can at least [strongly] subjectively be be read. Key point being the call to disruption here since that's...
Click to read more »ongoing disruption. The current admins have too much on their plate as it is. I suggest the case be declined and the filer be sanctioned for a disruptive filing...
Click to read more »(UTC) How are you defining "disruption"? Stuff I don't agree with? Malleus Fatuorum 21:35, 23 May 2011 (UTC) Defining disruptive is a simple eyes open common...
Click to read more »administrator tools are often necessary to deal with this disruption and the ancillary disruption around it. Editors get harassing and obscene messages on...
Click to read more »measures, such as revert restrictions, with respect to pages that are being disrupted in topic areas subject to discretionary sanctions", I'd like to request...
Click to read more »response to claims made in a newspaper. 'Free' Can Disrupt Your Business – Yes, free can disrupt your business, as the Encyclopedia Britannica is finding...
Click to read more »anyway" is both a knowing violation and disruptive. It's the disruptive edits I'm trying to highlight, because disruption is the basis of the complaint. I notice...
Click to read more »being disrupted by the socks of Aydın memmedov2000, Beyoglou, Steverci. And a listing of disruption for the last 3 yrs: 2022 disruption 2021 disruption, 2020...
Click to read more »This poll is to decide whether we should adopt Wikipedia:Dealing with disruptive or antisocial editors. If adopted, the policy will not be set in stone...
Click to read more »blame editors for disruption when there is none and I mean literally zero disruption. In fact, to those that said I caused a disruption, please show me...
Click to read more »Skinny McGee allege that GuardianZ has engaged in sockpuppetry and general disruption on the article. He denies the allegations and argues that Dionyseus and...
Click to read more »CMummert · talk 17:42, 18 April 2007 (UTC) POINT requires disruption. When did the disruption occur - when I put in the category two years ago, or when...
Click to read more »been resolved by lesser sanctions and that often result in considerable disruption or stress to other editors. A ban is not merely a request to avoid editing...
Click to read more »DS/AE to stop disruption. DS/AE has become a tool to eliminate editors and IDONTLIKEIT content stemming from POV, not behavioral disruption which can be...
Click to read more »counselled in the Civility policy. Don't inflame disputes, so that they become disruptive to Wikipedia's function and thus require administrative intervention....
Click to read more »come from IPv6 addresses, the June 6 deployment has caused significant disruption. Various scripts that are now being fed IPv6 addresses as input are either...
Click to read more »Wikipedia policy and norms. Their disruptive edits occur in talk page interactions with other users; such disruption may not directly harm an article,...
Click to read more »legality revert which was made without discussion on talk page. This is a disruptive behavior. I guess admins are fair here, Gila. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 01:00...
Click to read more »WikiYoungAdults may go on occasional edit binges, in which they cause general disruption to several articles, often without meaning to. During these periods, they...
Click to read more »block. Episodes and characters 2: A case involving alleged continuing disruption of articles concerning television series episodes and characters, following...
Click to read more »need to be made to show exactly what the ensuing disruption actually entailed. If no actual disruption can be demonstrated, then these allegators need...
Click to read more »this COMPLETELY ignores the disruption caused by the other party. Regardless of who started it, disruption is disruption. Twitbookspacetube (talk) 05:49...
Click to read more »there: The important component of hounding is disruption to another user's own enjoyment of editing, or disruption to the project generally, for no constructive...
Click to read more »This page is under development as part of the Wikipedia:Dealing with disruptive or antisocial editors policy draft. Please feel free to tinker with it...
Click to read more »of be disruptive [130]. 25 April 2009 - Blocked 72 hours, for disruption at same WP:GA article. 29 April 2009 - Blocked one week, for disruption at same...
Click to read more »consequences that difficult blocks can lead to. Any admin faced with a disruptive or abusive editor, or who is being threatened because of having previously...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) The relationship to your arbcom cases is pure disruption. You are being disruptive. I don't report here every dispute, I'm barely involved in...
Click to read more »disagreement, that is their right. Unless the conversation is expressly disruptive and turning into a flame war, let the conversation continue unabated,...
Click to read more »predictable outbreaks of sock attacks and other forms of retaliatory disruption from their side. We need topic bans for a couple of ringleaders and revert...
Click to read more »secretive about its functions or existence. The aims of such groups may be disruption of the project, promotion of its members to become Wikipedia functionaries...
Click to read more »own edit could prove to be a disruption, which would violate WP:POINT. This ANI report could be viewed as such a disruption. I understand what you were...
Click to read more »defending this disruption by someone with a history of disruption. We let this go last time. A month and a half, we let this disruption go on. Enough is...
Click to read more »an editor to another article to continue disruption. ... The important part is the disruption - disruption is considered harmful. Wikistalking is the...
Click to read more »types of harassment [37] which include wikistalking (for the purposes of disruption), targeted personal attacks (repeated personal attacks on a particular...
Click to read more »'Dominion' article have been locked again. Given this editor's continuous disruption, Soulscanner should be sanctioned, the 'Canada' and 'Dominion' articles...
Click to read more »undoing each other. Please note that being disruptive is being blockable, 3RR is an upper limit on disruption, if you read it closely it will note exactly...
Click to read more »does not remotely null or invalidate his history of disputes and disruption, disruption at this band’s articles, or any he makes in the future there and...
Click to read more »by which volunteers could respond to issues of persistent vandalism or disruptive editing from IP addresses. The process involved (1) taking note of persistent...
Click to read more »fit the disruption and indefinite blocks followed by discussions of long term solutions prior to unblock certainly fit this current disruption.Griswaldo...
Click to read more »"Users Soham321 and Bastun talk page disruption, disrespect for process, etc." I have had issues with talk page disruption and disrespect for the process regarding...
Click to read more »thinking about it, but in this case taking the case may actually minimize disruption. NativeForeigner Talk 06:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC) I would also note that...
Click to read more »them. Interweaving rebuttals into the middle of another person's comments disrupts the flow of the discussion and breaks the attribution of comments. It may...
Click to read more »to reduce disruption to the project. Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia...
Click to read more »February 2013 (UTC) Disruptive editing has continued at various articles after JoshuSasori's indefinite block for harrassment and disruption. The MO continues...
Click to read more »rises to the level of disruption... and thus requires Admin action. Blueboar (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC) If there is disruption (and I am not sure...
Click to read more »by anyone who has had to deal with WV's disruption (and those that have not had to deal with WV's disruption would include you: [144]). In terms of ANI...
Click to read more »entirely admins) who patrol these articles and attempt to keep them free of disruption. These users are generally very knowledgeable about the subject and committed...
Click to read more »so that IPs can no longer cause disruption [14] and obviously Iaof2017 wasn't blocked because reverting IP disruption is not considered actionable by...
Click to read more »was anticipation of disruption without any disruption (again, unless you count those who freaked out about the possible disruption). -- Ned Scott 06:56...
Click to read more »resigned to getting their point across through edit warring and other disruption. A quick look at the block logs of a number of the participants show that...
Click to read more »at their judgement, block IP addresses that disrupt the normal functioning of Wikipedia. Such disruption is to be objectively defined by specific policies...
Click to read more »are for the purpose of preventing disruption of the encyclopedia. It is hard for me to see the risk of disruption from an editor who disappeared in February...
Click to read more »and because of their higher potential for disruption over long periods). And I don't think repeated disruption, warning, excuses (that often come across...
Click to read more »18 March 2008 (UTC) Accept. This has been a rumbling dispute causing disruption for some time now, and in light of the repeated failure of all other dispute...
Click to read more »to prevent damage or disruption when first imposed, or the action is no longer reasonably necessary to prevent damage or disruption. Arbitrators hearing...
Click to read more »emphasizing that the same rules should apply to everybody (assuming disruption is disruption no matter who does it, Tevildo), I will let his statement below...
Click to read more »don't generally think that giving "disruption" as the primary reason for a block is a good idea, unless the disruption is obvious and unquestionable, or...
Click to read more »recognition and infamy neutralizes common primary motivators for vandalism and disruption. Media exposure of vandalism on Wikipedia seems to invite increased vandalism...
Click to read more »at which continual disruption occurs. This userpage includes content deliberately created with the intent of causing such disruption, and this should not...
Click to read more »P&G technicalities to try to win a content dispute, WP:Consensus and WP:Disruption might apply. When editors use inappropriate P&G argumentation to drive...
Click to read more »August 2009 (UTC) Support, with the understanding that disruption of a talk page is still disruption. Suggest adding article probation if these problems...
Click to read more »WP:FRINGE theory. The only way we can prevent further disruption to the project, and it is indeed disruption, is to issue a sanction of some sort. That's not...
Click to read more »disrupt the talkpage (and removing appropriate comments constitutes disruption), I'm certain you will earn a well-deserved block for that disruption....
Click to read more »he's been heavily involved in the disruption. Jabbsworth (talk) 23:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC) I haven't seen much disruption involving Night of the Big Wind...
Click to read more »The nomination was unquestionably made for the purposes of vandalism or disruption and specifically both Criterion #2a obviously frivolous or vexatious nominations...
Click to read more »long been disruptive, and it's surely been frustrating for user:Chaipau, who has spent the most time dealing with Bhaskarbhagawati's disruption. IMHO, an...
Click to read more »actively disruptive, but not so uncontroversially that G-series CSD criteria apply. [...] There are situations of suspected but less clear disruption, for...
Click to read more »See: 1st disruption in Epic Cycle 2nd disruption in Epic Cycle] 3rd disruption in Epic Cycle 4th disruption of Epic Cycle 1st disruption of Venetus...
Click to read more »This topic ban may be unsuspended and imposed onto TenPoundHammer if disruption by BLARing restarts, as determined by any of: (1) a consensus of administrators...
Click to read more »evidence in this request relates only to disruption concerning that article. If there is also similar disruption concerning other articles, a new request...
Click to read more »the user that you've decided has done something wrong. Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point Wikipedia:No personal attacks meta:Don't...
Click to read more »squeeze blood from a turnip. Wikipedia:Keep it down to earth Wikipedia:Disruptive editing Wikipedia:Call a spade a spade Wikipedia:AGF is not a suicide...
Click to read more »was obviously to avoid continued feuding behavior and other disruption. This isn't disruptive behavior, nor feuding. If anything, MF is the victim of such...
Click to read more »level of disruption that would normally call for individual sanctions, their actions taken together have taken on a collectively disruptive form. The...
Click to read more »would intervene and stop the disruption should it continue or that the request for such an intervention would stop the disruption, which was the case here...
Click to read more »specific policies objectively defining forms of disruption. Finally it says that blocks for disruption are almost always "controversial". That is a link...
Click to read more »good faith, intentional disruption [4] 16:17, 31 October Organizing the disruption [5] 16:45, 31 October Reorganizing the disruption [6] 16:45, 31 October...
Click to read more »posted here as disruptive editing by JeffJor; CU check indicates JeffJor's IPs do not match these, so I am reposting it as a disruption by an IP user....
Click to read more »active removal discussion, and apparent bad-faith tag proliferation and disruption of the consensus-building process (WP:TAGWAR/WP:OVERTAGGING/WP:CONSENSUS)...
Click to read more »know who else they've done this to. If that's disruption, then they, starting with HKelkar, are disruptive. Hornplease 10:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC) This...
Click to read more »block should be "long enough to change the behavior or prevent further disruption'". I've offered to shorten the block if the user will commit to abiding...
Click to read more »an effective job of illustrating a pattern of disruption. If there is a genuine pattern of disruption here, it should be easy to document it. --JBL (talk)...
Click to read more »editors unintentionally adding to and perpetuating the disruption as they edit. Common forms of disruption include (but are not limited to): Insults, accusations...
Click to read more »those logs are public for good reason. The important part is the disruption - disruption is considered harmful. Just following you isn't stalking. --Onorem...
Click to read more »closure diff was to reduce disruption but since User:Maunus's revert of my closure he has done nothing but raise disruption - it has been reclosed quite...
Click to read more »disruption, increasing BLP focuses, the mild legal threat, and the response above after an earlier 12 hr block yesterday, all added up to disruption in...
Click to read more »this user's presence will attract others to disrupt the project, especially give the level of disruption we have seen before, we may have to take all...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Any disruption seems very storm-in-a-teacup stuff - assorted "odd edits" (as you called them), barely registering as disruption at all, the occasional...
Click to read more »to this was “Domer, are you familiar with the term "WP:BP#Disruption|persistent disruption"? This is all thrown into stark light, when one looks at there...
Click to read more »disruption creates a need for additional administrative tools. Administrators should only utilize the ARBPIA General Sanctions to reduce disruption caused...
Click to read more »edited much less disruptively before his first few blocks), but it has been tiring over the past few months to have disruption after disruption. —LactoseTIT...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Disruption is a reason for blocking. KillerChihuahua?!? 11:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC) For the Fifth time any evidence of disruption, please provide...
Click to read more »punitive, and this one isn't. The problem is the ongoing disruption, and I see no hope that the disruption will not resume once they are unblocked. They simply...
Click to read more »articles up to date, while balancing out the need to protect articles from disruption. Wikipedia:Recentism – explanatory supplement about imbalanced focus on...
Click to read more »all this disruption?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 21:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC) I have not made any contentions changes or initiated any disruption. [116] What...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's core policy pages, often the reason given for it will be cited as "disruption". Some view this as a weasel word and an attempt to justify issuing a...
Click to read more »AlphaQuadrant has similarly accused me of disruption; as has Nobody Ent accused me of disruption. The only disruption that has occurred is some editors cannot...
Click to read more »justice) we should determine whether any disruption has taken place and (if so) who was perpetrated such alleged disruption. I'd like to see some examples of...
Click to read more »between assuming good faith, discouraging attention-seekers, and preventing disruption, but the current suite of warning templates does a pretty amicable job...
Click to read more »what is needed to help end the disruption is an understanding on your part that your repeated actions have caused disruption, not just passionate conversation...
Click to read more »charming edit on my user page, after I gave him a stern warning about his disruption on WP:RFPP. (The duck test makes it clear that the IP is the same individual...
Click to read more »hours for disruptive editing, personal attacks and talkpage disruption." is not quite correct. The last two are correct, but there was no disruptive editing...
Click to read more »JoshuaZ and Consumed Crustacean have accused Poor of POV pushing and disruption; Poor has not introduced evidence in the case. Ed Poor was party to two...
Click to read more »policies already do a better job of handling this manner of disruption without creating more disruption. C) WP:DRN, WP:MEDIATION, WP:ARBCOM.... I'm looking at...
Click to read more »Something is clearly wrong here. TheShadowCrow has a long history of disruptive editing in AA area, for which he was indef topic banned in October 2012...
Click to read more »point of blocks, so we're always told, is to stop disruption. TPO was blocked and any supposed disruption ended. Now he's agreed to chill out and to continue...
Click to read more »which incidences would have qualified to be treated as falling under the disruption clause, in the interst of efficiency: nobody has an interest in an endless...
Click to read more »stopped from editing in contentious areas because it causes too much disruption in topics where participants are told they must follow the rules, yet...
Click to read more »whether disruptive or not, and then he can campaign to get me banned. He's transparent. This is supposed to be about disruption - where is the disruption??--Vintagekits...
Click to read more »blocked him for disruption, but then I noticed that he impersonated me to intimidate the above IP editor. This, mixed with the other disruption, has led me...
Click to read more »his "disruptive conduct". This site ban proposal divided the Committee, passing by a vote of 8–4. This case was opened to review alleged disruptive editing...
Click to read more »subject form a pattern of disruptive behavior, which is not acceptable anywhere on Wikipedia. And unfortunately, his disruption is part of a pattern of...
Click to read more »suggests the restriction is helping to minimize disruption. I believe the best way to prevent disruption to the project would be to consider my two amendment...
Click to read more »can't deal with the constructive criticism regarding your disruption and your support for disruption then you should avoid such discussions all together. D4iNa4...
Click to read more »WP:FOLLOWING also? After pointing out some ARS disruption at the 2020 ANI discussion and tackling some further ARS disruption elsewhere, I realised I had omitted...
Click to read more »list) but I don't see significant disruption there. Perhaps you would indicate specifically which edits are disruptive and how? I may well be missing something...
Click to read more »a variety of disruptive behavior ([5]), including, but not limited to, using Wikipedia as a soapbox ([6], [7]), threatening disruption of the project...
Click to read more »not the case, you'd have to admit that I was not actually banned for disruption. Tough call on your part, isn't it? Either the block was valid and I'm...
Click to read more »you find another community to disrupt, for that is exactly what is happening. Mbstpo's actions are at most minor disruption, if any at all. For example...
Click to read more »The only disruption here is being caused by concerted efforts to delete the proposal! Is there any evidence presented yet for ongoing disruption other than...
Click to read more »This topic is the subject of massive disruption from single purpose adgenda driven editors - from far out disruptive racists to merely ignorant, ill-informed...
Click to read more »or where protection is needed to remove or prevent vandalism or other disruption. Admins should exercise common sense, and may prefer to try other methods...
Click to read more »such disruption. It is characterstic that they are trying to conceal their tracks by removing my comments on Talk:Tenedos regarding the disruption. Any...
Click to read more »or the Arbitration Committee in order to resolve disputes and curtail disruptive behaviour. For information on sanctions applied to individual editors...
Click to read more »ANI. --qedk (t 桜 c) 20:07, 16 February 2020 (UTC) Disruption made in good faith is still disruption. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:27, 16 February 2020...
Click to read more »case no single edit is disruptive but the overall pattern clearly is. Their edits are largely confined to talk pages; such disruption may not directly harm...
Click to read more »after that, is disruption to the project. If an unblock occurs, I may open an RFC, or request arbitration on the matter. The petty disruption has to stop...
Click to read more »Betacommand engaged in harassment and in disruption to make a point" (the user was me)....."The level of disruption (caused by Delta) has been well beyond...
Click to read more »above is merely your opinion, btw, and is wrong). (3) disruption on these articles - what disruption?; diffs please. (4) You have now banned yet another...
Click to read more »not solely, met with battleground conduct, incivility, hostility, or disruption toward the editor and the discussion – it is likely that the user you're...
Click to read more »(UTC) A declaration of intent to disrupt is treated the same as actual disruption, as blocks are meant to prevent disruption. As for the block having exprired...
Click to read more »cause of disruption on the TP are Greg L (who failed to get Soibangla blocked this morning) and Trueitagain. The major causes of disruption in the article...
Click to read more »fact, the proposed decision seeks to admonish one editor involved in disruptive actions and to ban two others for 12 months. Voting so far has established...
Click to read more »action on disruption. I agree that maybe a content board would be a good idea, but that it would still need to be monitored for disruption. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez...
Click to read more »the situation is resolved and the disruption ends." This discussion will end sooner if not later. As for "disruption", well, if he is referring to requiring...
Click to read more »intention of causing disruption to 'bait' certain admins. What more do we need? --InShaneee 00:18, 4 August 2006 (UTC) What disruption did he actually cause...
Click to read more »cessation of the disruption upon the topic ban proves that it is, and that a second topic ban would only mean continued disruption in a third topic area...
Click to read more »inevitably leads to unacceptable disruption. Furthermore the combination of Domer48 and you also leads to unacceptable disruption. The combination of BigDunc...
Click to read more »until the disruption is over). Usually these things peter out in a short amount of time, but until and unless there's actual on-wiki disruption there's...
Click to read more »problematic behaviour escalate. But why do it when there's no recent disruption of Wikipedia? Content disputed are not solved by trying to get rid of...
Click to read more »sanctions: "[Username] hasn't edited since [date], so it looks like the disruption has stopped.") The symptoms of ANI flu are sudden, and affect an editor’s...
Click to read more »the level of disruption. This is not about bringing up old soup but to show that you have prior history of causing this sort of disruption and then trying...
Click to read more »edited much less disruptively before his first few blocks), but it has been tiring over the past few months to have disruption after disruption. —LactoseTIT...
Click to read more »to prevent disruptions, but in the process some interesting discussion has been lost. Discussion threads about the disruption: Disruption How male editors/men...
Click to read more »see no evidence Marco is being disruptive, and strongly recommend that QED either provide diffs of actual disruption or move on, well out of the arc...
Click to read more »me of disruption and trolling, but you won't find anything in my contributions that looks like disruption or trolling. That's assuming "disruption" is defined...
Click to read more »this open until an admin attends to the disruption here by multiple users, I suspect this isn't the last disruption here. Pikavoom Talk 14:12, 27 April 2022...
Click to read more »personal attacks and disruption, in addition to the edit warring. He returned as PerfectStorm. As PerfectStorm, he has continued his disruptive behavior, even...
Click to read more »means to disrupt; is it disruption to disagree with some decision, or to vote against the majority? We shouldn't throw the word "disruption" around liberally...
Click to read more »banner-related disruption of Talk:History of Vojvodina from WP:SPAs evading semi-protection & suspected creation of new WikiProject as part of the disruption G'day...
Click to read more »discussed here; both are at fault for the disruption, and so forcibly removing them from each other ends the disruption without us having to deal with yet another...
Click to read more »After analyzing the edits of 67.160.100.233, all I see is disruption, disruption, and disruption. This sort of edits are unacceptable, IMO. The IP not only...
Click to read more »injunction is to avoid disruption, and although some edits counter discussion slow things down, I'd say he/she has not been disruptive. Karbinski (talk) 18:13...
Click to read more »indefinite block for disruption. As such it was well within the bounds of legitimate admin descretion in dealing with obvious disruption. To be unblocked...
Click to read more »significant disruption of the article going back over a month, I have semi-protected the article for three months. Three additional examples of disruption scattered...
Click to read more »later posts to his talk page expressed regret for his disruption or an undertaking not to disrupt in the same manner again, I recognise that he gives little...
Click to read more »JoshuaZ and Consumed Crustacean have accused Poor of POV pushing and disruption; Poor has not introduced evidence in the case. Ed Poor was party to two...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Expectations_and_norms_of_the_Wikipedia_community#Purpose_of_editing Wikipedia:Disruptive_editing#Examples_of_disruptive_editing Wikipedia:No personal attacks...
Click to read more »intended to prevent recurring disruption until such time as another equally effective measure to prevent further disruption is found." This was not a community...
Click to read more »This page is under development as part of the Wikipedia:Dealing with disruptive or antisocial editors policy draft. Please feel free to tinker with it...
Click to read more »not know that "knock off the disruption here" was in reference to a "coined" Wikipedia violation, Wikipedia:Disruptive editing that has a formal definition...
Click to read more »material from them, or persistently promote them, may be blocked for disruption after being warned. The appropriate length of the block depends on the...
Click to read more »"as clear a case of edit-warring and disruption against consensus as I've seen" and for pursuing the disruption while editing logged-out. A few weeks...
Click to read more »is still engaging in such disruption. Rampant original research such as this and this has been intermingled with disruptive talkpage rants and only today...
Click to read more »Ten? Fifteen? VK has a history of disruption and all prior experience has shown that he will continue to disrupt unless prevented from doing so. As I...
Click to read more »his abortive RfA is but one example of this and is revealing of ongoing disruption. You and Soulscanner have also had plenty of time to contest relevant...
Click to read more »damage or disruption to Wikipedia, not to punish users". No one, not even the user filing the request, claimed I had damaged or disrupted the project...
Click to read more »reduce the mandatory 24 hours. Blocking is done to prevent disruption; this was disruption, and Gurch showed no signs of stopping. Neil ☎ 14:56, 19 October...
Click to read more »with minor disruption. But its not surprising to see you here --Snowded TALK 21:13, 10 November 2011 (UTC) The last 2 claims of disruption (#10 & #11)...
Click to read more »coordinate their activities to be intentionally disruptive, how can one fairly distinguish between coordinate disruption and simply a case of similar interests...
Click to read more »active removal discussion, and apparent bad-faith tag proliferation and disruption of the consensus-building process (WP:TAGWAR/WP:OVERTAGGING/WP:CONSENSUS)...
Click to read more »single-minded disruption of this person. As evidenced in the checkuser case linked above, semiprotection was circumvented by a few accounts to further disrupt this...
Click to read more »ArbCom unanimously. Since then, SPUI has engaged in engaged in massive disruption of pages related to WikiProject California State Highways, WikiProject...
Click to read more »Arbitration Enforcement will prevent further violation of these sanctions and disruption of deletion processes. @EdJohnston: I didn't file this report hoping for...
Click to read more »for your disruptive behaviors"? In fact your past has many connections to this thread because this is an evidence of your pattern of disruption as somebody...
Click to read more »checkuser tasks - Alison ❤ Jehochman Talk : "Identifying and stopping disruption (mostly in the form of inappropriate commentary and questions from voters...
Click to read more »of disruptive behavior on the "Asmahan" article; Arab Cowboy denies the allegations, and claims that Supreme Deliciousness is pursuing a disruptive agenda...
Click to read more »