Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
True vandals and trolls (as distinguished from users who dabble in minor vandalism) seek recognition and infamy by interrupting and frustrating the Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Must have had the sandbox in their mind when they were writing about this. DNFT. BlueAg09 (Talk) 08:53, 22 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. Seth Bresnett...
Click to read more »it helps contain them. Please consider your prognosis in the light of WP:DNFT before you !vote, as, to be honest, I am basing my response on my limited...
Click to read more »Jimbo v. Willy. Daniel.Bryant 12:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC) Keep. WP:DNFT is not a policy. I also don't see much troll feeding in this template but...
Click to read more »(UTC) FYI I tried to steer clear of this in my nomination statement per WP:DNFT, but whoever closes this discussion needs to know that Archibald16 (talk ·...
Click to read more »not meant sarcastically it's obviously inappropriate for WP:BEANS and WP:DNFT reasons; if it's meant sarcastically it's not funny, confusing and inappropriate...
Click to read more »February 2008 (UTC) By definition, talking to trolls is unproductive. Hence WP:DNFT. Wknight94 (talk) 20:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC) Users DGG, Kim Dent-Brown...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep per Ghirla; delete abusers. No more MPA than a reference to WP:DNFT. Septentrionalis 20:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC) Delete as per nom. Hawkestone...
Click to read more »April 2018 (UTC) Wikipedia:DNFT until incident about his proxy usage is solved here. -- Pofka (talk) 13:41, 3 April 2018 (UTC) DNFT is a baseless accusation...
Click to read more »encyclopedia, not creating accounts for comedy's sake. Now remember, WP:DNFT. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:40, 25 December 2006 (UTC) As evidenced by this diff...
Click to read more »WP:LIBEL, truth doesn't come into it. --Tango 01:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC) WP:DNFT, people. Let's go back to article writing, this is time-consuming and pointless...
Click to read more »Alexander Graham Bell, including "following me home" and I really prefer WP:DNFT. Any suggestions would be appreciated. FWIW Bzuk (talk). I've indef blocked...
Click to read more »say best course of action, as I see it, is a combination of WP:RBI, and WP:DNFT. The funny thing about announcing that you are in a mafia, is that anyone...
Click to read more »old for CU. Good catch, Urban Rose, but really, I think we're done here. DNFT and all that. --barneca (talk) 23:27, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Resolved – Nothing...
Click to read more »from mine. Ottava Rima (talk) 07:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC) I think that WP:DNFT is probably applicable here. The question then arises, if not feeding, what...
Click to read more »indignant about. — Satori Son 22:49, 19 November 2007 (UTC) Enough, probably. WP:DNFT?--Rodhullandemu (please reply here - contribs) 22:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Haven't been snippy with him (or anyone), but the trolling is getting old. WP:DNFT only carries you so far. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC) I...
Click to read more »to say it's odd that you take such offense at someone linking you to WP:DNFT and yet you return to another public forum here attempting to stir up the...
Click to read more »avoid.... I’m also quite sure that being unresponsive and referring to WP:DNFT when people are discussing your WP:RFA, was not the best way to resolve a...
Click to read more »when it becomes personal, not because of WP:INVOLVED but only in order to DNFT, but if there's none around then why delay the inevitable? -- zzuuzz (talk)...
Click to read more »presence with fanfare... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 21:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC) WP:DNFT naerii - talk 22:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC) I agree, no action or response is...
Click to read more »ᛇᚹᛟ 06:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC) These assertions are laughable. Behnam, DNFT.--Chaser - T 06:15, 29 August 2007 (UTC) Apparently JKDN (talk · contribs ·...
Click to read more »attracting replies by continuing to post here, although others should know WP:DNFT. – Chacor 09:58, 13 November 2006 (UTC) Going back to Matthew Fenton's point...
Click to read more »cleaning up. 181.24.21.138 (talk) 22:09, 1 February 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:DNFT, although this does get into a weird grey area between that and the fact...
Click to read more »then Wikipedia is not the place for you. --Boricuaeddie 01:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC) Boricuaeddie, DNFT :-P. --Mosquitopsu 16:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »serious problem users, and consensus was to delete them under the umbrella of DNFT, if I recall correctly. I'm more than open to ideas regarding this. KillerChihuahua...
Click to read more »peter out. ---Sluzzelin talk 12:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC) Even better, WP:DNFT applies here, if you believe this to be a troll, then do nothing at all....
Click to read more »clear. Help! --doncram (talk) 18:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC) Resolved – WP:DNFT --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:13, 1 February 2010 (UTC) Resolved – The user that...
Click to read more »withdrawing from all discussions in which this user is involved, per WP:DNFT. Admins may contact me privately if they desire to pursue this further. Thanks...
Click to read more »fitting your propensities.Kundan After Sundown 05:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC) WP:DNFT -- Samir धर्म 22:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC) Let us see what has happened 05:37...
Click to read more »you are defaming. Hipocrite (talk) 20:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Note WP:DNFT. --Dave1185 (talk) 20:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Dave, Hipocrite is right...
Click to read more »the admin corps. Leaving this individual unblocked, while it fulfills WP:DNFT admirably, also sends the message that foot-stamping, high-pitched whining...
Click to read more »reasonable and uncontroversial. On the first, I am going to play the WP:DNFT/WP:IAR card. Yes, it has been a long time. No, I am not going to validate...
Click to read more »and WP:EHP. If they are the latter, continued discussion is contary to WP:DNFT.Nobody Ent 11:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC) @Griswaldo, "You are all being trolled...
Click to read more »(UTC) To spell it out, please indef Serial Thanker (talk · contribs) per WP:DNFT and Special:Log/thanks/Serial Thanker. Johnuniq (talk) 08:20, 17 January...
Click to read more »attacks, they were trolling ("If I called you a murderer...") WP:RBI and WP:DNFT and all that. NE Ent 03:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC) They were doing both;...
Click to read more »editors regardless of motivation. DGG ( talk ) 00:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC) WP:DNFT--regentspark (comment) 13:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC) The following discussion...
Click to read more »WP:DNFT WP:RBI The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. Within the past 3 days, 3 SPIs for Access Denied, who betrayed the trust...
Click to read more »her opinion of the situation. нмŵוτнτ 17:58, 28 February 2008 (UTC) *ahem* DNFT. John Reaves 21:07, 28 February 2008 (UTC) For what it is worth, and it was...
Click to read more »[33] Sarah 03:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC) I was going to bite my tongue per WP:DNFT but this user has been threatening to leave since late last year. He reappears...
Click to read more »--Cyde Weys 03:13, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Keep It does encourage civility and WP:DNFT, in everyone else. Septentrionalis 19:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Keep per MiraLuka...
Click to read more »to stop when expressed clearly and politely is disruptive (pick either WP:DNFT or WP:CIR). The topic does not help their case either (bayesian inference:...
Click to read more »(UTC) FYI I tried to steer clear of this in my nomination statement per WP:DNFT, but whoever closes this discussion needs to know that Archibald16 (talk ·...
Click to read more »events that have already happened? This has entered into the realm of farce; DNFT, and all. Ravenswing 20:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC) Your choice. The essay...
Click to read more »Must have had the sandbox in their mind when they were writing about this. DNFT. BlueAg09 (Talk) 08:53, 22 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. Seth Bresnett...
Click to read more »of living persons/Help. -- Hoary (talk) 05:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC) WP:DNFT (LTA?). Bon courage (talk) 08:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC) The following discussion...
Click to read more »clear vandal and/or troll then I wouldn't attempt to communicate, per WP:DNFT. ~~ Dr Dec (Talk) ~~ 11:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC) Question from Mkativerata...
Click to read more »events that have already happened? This has entered into the realm of farce; DNFT, and all. Ravenswing 20:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC) Your choice. The essay...
Click to read more »because the edit I was responding to is here. It was rightly removed per WP:DNFT, but if someone wants to see why I suddenly brought up double sharps, I didn't...
Click to read more »(UTC) To get help, see WP:WQA RudolfRed (talk) 23:50, 20 July 2012 (UTC) WP:DNFT. 69.62.243.48 (talk) 03:06, 23 July 2012 (UTC) Hi, editors, Apologies if...
Click to read more »"civil" (=polite, essentially) even in front of reckless vandals, see also WP:DNFT. TigraanClick here to contact me 10:57, 16 March 2018 (UTC) Hello. Thank...
Click to read more »Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:38, 22 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VAIN. WP:DNFT applies. Alba 03:32, 23 March 2006 (UTC) Keep due to previous comments having...
Click to read more »"we are here," or why any of this could be talkpage-worthy but I think WP:DNFT might somehow be relevant. Cool Hand Luke 07:00, 21 June 2008 (UTC) Comments:...
Click to read more »Doug Weller talk 11:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC) OK, this delves into WP:DNFT territory, but I will still answer. NPOV is not only about sourcing reliably;...
Click to read more »this is relevant at all to the OP, as well as the baffling edit summary of "DNFT".--WaltCip (talk) 13:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC) If the "problem" is "nattering"...
Click to read more »240 02:58, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Endorse per WP:DELETE: NN, no refs & per DNFT; any semblence of credibility of the conspiracy posse is gone. Carlossuarez46...
Click to read more »WP:DNFT The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. Are hospitals in Australia tended to by kangaroo nurses? 71.146.10.213 (talk)...
Click to read more »WP:DNFT The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. is Kofi Annan played by Morgan Freeman in real life? How does he keep his schedule...
Click to read more »WP:DNFT --Jayron32 11:52, 31 August 2018 (UTC) The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. My local corner shopkeeper Mr Khan is...
Click to read more »DNFT--see banned user Wickwack at talk The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. There is a vast multitude of survey based pschology...
Click to read more »DNFT. See talk--Jayron32 04:58, 28 June 2017 (UTC) The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. Is the limit of the intellect be...
Click to read more »WP:DNFT The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. Dear Mr. Wales I am Sheik Hassan Bin Mohammad Al-Quattani from the Emirate of...
Click to read more »some sort of retort, and has very little to do with the actual act. Also DNFT and all that per Asilvering. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 15:26, 2 August 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »cycle you refer to is indeed a recurring problem, but when it does occur, WP:DNFT/WP:BAIT should be followed - quoting it, resorting to attacks, or not seeking...
Click to read more »you think? I'm done with you, I think Bill was right - I'm bailing out WP:DNFT. - Nick Thorne talk 12:08, 15 December 2009 (UTC) The proposer is putting...
Click to read more »you will stop violating core Wikipedia policies? What is the abbrevation dnft stand for? Why did write in part: If not, let's stop cooking this trollish...
Click to read more »influence and obedience. -165.234.252.11 (talk) 21:11, 9 January 2018 (UTC) WP:DNFT. Alexbrn (talk) 21:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC) The following discussion is closed...
Click to read more »Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:38, 22 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:VAIN. WP:DNFT applies. Alba 03:32, 23 March 2006 (UTC) Keep due to previous comments having...
Click to read more »WP:DNFT--Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC) RevisionDeletion on Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard performed by Scottywong (talk ·...
Click to read more »240 02:58, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Endorse per WP:DELETE: NN, no refs & per DNFT; any semblence of credibility of the conspiracy posse is gone. Carlossuarez46...
Click to read more »the conservative war on LGBTQ rights". LA Times. Retrieved 2023-03-03. WP:DNFT per Shibbolethink. OP is blocked. --Jayron32 19:20, 9 March 2023 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »The editor should be made to go away. It would be an act of kindness. WP:DNFT Sean.hoyland (talk) 08:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC) Procedurally closed or not...
Click to read more »