Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
normally follow. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcuts WP:DICDEFWP:DICDEF WP:NOTDICTWP:NOTDICT WP:WINADWP:WINAD WP:DICTWP:DICT...
Click to read more »dela.dict.cc: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...
Click to read more »dict.leo.org: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...
Click to read more »dict.sztaki.hu: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link dict.it; 0 records. Linksearch - Linkreport - Eagle's spam report search - interwiki link search - LinkWatcher search - Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link dict.luxdico.com; 0 records. dict.luxdico.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck...
Click to read more »twblg.dict.edu.tw: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...
Click to read more »wikt:de:User:Sae1962 (t - c; 37) to wikt:de:obsolescence (diff !top) - Link: de.pons.eu/dict/search/results/?in=&l=deen&q=obsolescence (R/Xmeta/L- removed) User is in...
Click to read more »other content. Available for Android, Linux, iOS, Mac OS X, Windows. Golden Dict (http://goldendict.org/) - multi-platform dictionary browser with native...
Click to read more »w:de:Obersorbische Sprache (diff !top) - Link: corpora.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/?dict=sorb (R/Xmeta/L) User is in a trusted group editor on some wikis 2008-10-04...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete under WP:NOT#DICT per Redfarmer. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Speedy Delete under WP:NOT#DICT and I added a orphan tag...
Click to read more »password) target_cat = 'Stub_categories' master_dict = {} def get_subcats(cursor, cat): global master_dict results = [] cursor.execute(''' /* dubiousstubcats...
Click to read more »to w:pl:William Denison (diff !top) - Link: gutenberg.net.au/dictbiog/0-dict-biogD.html#denison1 (R/Xmeta/L) User is in a trusted group sysop on some...
Click to read more »lang=po. * Links added in this diff: www.dict.cc/deutsch-englisch/Elefant.html (29, 185, 1, 1) pons.eu/dict/search/results/?q=Elefant&l=deen (29, 78,...
Click to read more »netloc[:-1] if title in page_dict: page_dict[title].append(domain) else: page_dict[title] = [domain] for title, domain_list in page_dict.iteritems(): for domain...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. W.marsh 17:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC) HanDeDICT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »July 2007 (UTC) Esetok (talk) 18:26, 6 April 2013 (UTC) http://dictionary.al-islam.com/Eng/Dicts/SelDict.asp?Lang=ENG&CurrPage=1&Theme=26&RDF=1&DI=26...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) (contested prod) Per WP:DICT. It provides an origion section, definitions, and tenses section. Also an...
Click to read more »result was speedy close - no rationale provided for deletion and WP:NOT#DICT does not apply. This is a stub not a dictionary entry. Canley (talk) 01:34...
Click to read more »w:fr:Dictionnaire (diff - undo) - Link: www.deq.ca/livres/dict.html. * Links added in this diff: www.deq.ca/livres/dict.html (10, 11, 10, 2) 2009-08-22 00:12:58 (UTC):...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT Mduvekot (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC) Delete as a neologism, and WP:NOT#DICT. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:34...
Click to read more »Index Suffrage (CS) Suffrage (Dict.) Suffragists (WD) African-American suffragists (WD) Update the list now |SPARQL |Find images This list is automatically...
Click to read more »Online dict Online dict Online encyc news story Online dict Online dict Online dict blackstone quote Legal article, new south wales Online dict Jury charge...
Click to read more »com/echo/zoekrobot/woordenboek/search/?k=argon&waar=feld2 (25, 47, 1, 1) dict.sztaki.hu/dict_search.php?o=eng&flash=&e=1&vk=&in_form=1&l=hun%3aeng%3aenghundi...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Wikipedia is not a dictionary, per WP:DICT. Gary King (talk) 17:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. and WP:MADEUP...
Click to read more »Delete - dict def. Burgundavia 20:54, May 20, 2004 (UTC) - Keep - I like the new addition to the page, makes it more than a dict def. Burgundavia 21:40...
Click to read more »elsewhere, looks like WP:DICT. PrussianOwl (talk) 17:33, 19 December 2018 (UTC) Delete: Already covered material and WP:DICT. Wouldn't make it on mainspace...
Click to read more »last year[1] with 1.5kB, still with lots of WP:OR and a major dict-def vibe (WP:NOT#DICT). I was going to bold-redirect it to either Good Vibrations (the...
Click to read more »December 2016 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NOT#DICT -- HighKing++ 14:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT. There's not enough here to be worth a...
Click to read more »Delete WP:SOURCES; WP:DICT. abf /talk to me/ 11:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC) Delete Already on Wiktionary, not for Wikipedia (WP:DICT). Also some oririgal...
Click to read more »netloc[:-1] if title in page_dict: page_dict[title].append(domain) else: page_dict[title] = [domain] for title, domain_list in page_dict.iteritems(): for domain...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Snow keep. It's clear that while WP:NOT#DICT exists, there's evidence that the article can be expanded as Altamel said...
Click to read more »NASCAR Fan24(radio me!) 23:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOT#DICT. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 01:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC) Delete: Per above (WP:NOT)...
Click to read more »14 January 2006 (UTC) Dict def that has already been transwiki-ed (also, CV concerns, heavily exceprted from etymology dict.) RJFJR 17:51, 8 January...
Click to read more »www.obg.fo/fob/fob.php?action=1&leitord=telefon (31, 147, 3, 1) dict.sztaki.hu/dict_search.php?l=hun%3aeng%3aenghundict&o=eng&flash=&e=1&vk=&in_form...
Click to read more »WP:NOT#DICT. It's already on wikitionary making this entry useless. Mitaphane ?|! 22:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC) Delete. Per nom and WP:NOT#DICT. Vassyana...
Click to read more »sentence, then I'd agree with a deletion based on WP:DICT. But this is not a good application of DICT, and, assuming good faith for the offline references...
Click to read more »seems. per nom. Pharmboy (talk) 19:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOT#DICT. Two One Six Five Five discuss my greatness 19:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Also...
Click to read more »fails WP:TWODABS so should be deleted. (these classifications seem more dict defs). It could be converted in an SIA or dabconcept but then it needs sources...
Click to read more »body image? Cyborg Ninja 03:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC) Delete Violates WP:NOT#DICT. We don't need these dicdef pages. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells...
Click to read more »per WP:NOT#DICT. Sting au Buzz Me... 06:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Transwiki if not already on Wiktionary, otherwise delete per WP:NOT#DICT. Redfarmer...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT Corpx 05:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC) Redirect to Wiktionary - bizarre, not really Not#Dict, but not really not notable....
Click to read more »WP:DICT. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 18:59, 12 December 2019 (UTC) Redirect to Discounts and allowances#Trade rate discount, this is a WP:DICT which...
Click to read more »Delete, with the extraneous stuff removed, it's a dict def. Just because it's not an English dict def doesn't mean it should be kept. Proto||type 12:49...
Click to read more »Index Suffrage (CS) Suffrage (Dict.) Suffragists (WD) African-American suffragists (WD) This table of missing women biographies was generated using Wikidata...
Click to read more »password) target_cat = 'Stub_categories' master_dict = {} def get_subcats(cursor, cat): global master_dict results = [] cursor.execute(''' /* directstubs...
Click to read more »3) to wikt:ru:paracittajānana (diff top) - Link: budsas.110mb.com/ebud/dict-ep/index.htm" (R/Xmeta/L) 2013-12-31 02:28:41 (UTC): wikt:ru:User:ВМНС (t...
Click to read more »Completely unsourced, 9 results on Google, and seems to be a case of WP:DICT. <RetroCraft314 talk/> 22:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC) Delete. Article is in Spanish...
Click to read more »Delete per WP:NOT#DICT. GregorB 14:55, 1 December 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom Toddst1 15:08, 1 December 2007 (UTC) Delete. It's a dict-def. -- Mikeblas 15:33...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) So WP:NOT#DICT and WP:NOT#OR are of no concern? --Latebird 21:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC) Keep and improve. WP:not#DICT and WP:NOR are a concern...
Click to read more »be joking. The saying you quote: "Wikipedia is not a dictionary" WP:NOT#DICT refers to policy about short articles which define a single word or indiscriminate...
Click to read more »peterized from Wikipedia. --Kinu t/c 22:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT and WP:NFT. JohnCD (talk) 22:21, 29 June 2008 (UTC) Delete as a neologism...
Click to read more »this is a conjuction, it can't reasonably be expanded. See WP:NOT#DICT or WP:DICT Obina 19:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC) Delete and Transwiki as dicdef...
Click to read more »for Wikipedia. utcursch 11:45, Oct 14, 2004 (UTC) Delete. Foreign language dict. def with horrible spelling errors. jni 12:21, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC) Delete --...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) Reads like a dictionary entry. WP:NOT#DICT may be applicable here. Navou talk 01:19, 24 December 2006 (UTC) Delete or...
Click to read more »From Cleanup: dict. def. Wiktionary -- EmperorBMA / ブリイアン 22:16, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC) dicdef Kd4ttc 04:13, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC) Wiktionary and delete -- Cyrius|✎...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Non-notable phrase, fails WP:NOT#DICT. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Redfarmer (talk) 23:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »com/dictionary/mulatto dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=mulatto*1+0&dict=A www.rootsweb.com/ www.mulatto.org www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=mulatto...
Click to read more »to delete both. Discussion: From Cleanup: Intravertebral, Intervertebral dict defs. delete 'em. Lefty 13:16, 2004 Apr 23 (UTC) Delete. Will probably always...
Click to read more »From Cleanup: Can this ever be more than a dict. def? Quite possibly if someone gives some background information, etc. The likely hood is small tho, and...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOT#DICT Graywalls (talk) 01:28, 9 March 2019 (UTC) Keep WP:NOT#DICT refers to single articles that are only definitions...
Click to read more »delete - perfect example of WP:NOT#DICT. The Evil Spartan 18:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Delete textbook WP:NOT#DICT. Hut 8.5 19:57, 12 September 2007...
Click to read more »violation of WP:NOT#DICT. Johnny338 (talk) 15:22, 26 May 2014 (UTC) Strong Delete: Per nom. Also, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. See WP:NOT#DICT. -- Jersey92...
Click to read more »29 2004, consensus was to delete. Discussion: From Cleanup: Exclusivist dict def. Delete if not improved by the end of five days. -- Graham :) | Talk...
Click to read more »of California English. Also, do not merge because of WP:DICT; the first sentence of WP:DICT is "Wikipedia is not a dictionary, or a slang, jargon, or...
Click to read more »day. Euryalus (talk) 11:32, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Snowball delete. WP:NOT#DICT is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of this article's unsuitability for...
Click to read more »consensus was to transwiki to wiktionary. Discussion: From Cleanup: Top shelf dict def. Delete. Dicdef with no likelihood of improvement. DJ Clayworth 17:07...
Click to read more »additionally WP:NOT#DICT may be applicable here. Navou talk 00:47, 25 December 2006 (UTC) Delete not even worth TransWiking. Fails WP:NOT#DICT --Malevious Userpage...
Click to read more »From Cleanup: Stance: Sub-stub, dict. def. - SimonP 01:18, Apr 21, 2004 (UTC) Delete- dicdef. --Davout 13:04, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC) Delete. Cribcage 15:11...
Click to read more »From Cleanup: dict. def. Wiktionary -- EmperorBMA / ブリイアン 22:16, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC) Delete - wikitionary - Tεxτurε 15:46, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC) Merge with existing...
Click to read more »etimulugia=1&variantesg=1&derivadi=1&spressioni=1 (12, 87, 1, 1) dict.sztaki.hu/dict_search.php?l=hun%3aeng%3aenghundict&o=eng&e=1&w=apa (12, 34, 1, 1)...
Click to read more »Delete: Per above (NOT, NEO, DICT). - Rjd0060 14:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Delete To copy Rjd0060: Per above (NOT, NEO, DICT). Pigman 17:27, 14 October...
Click to read more »43 google hits, only a dict def, not even a real word CryptoDerk 04:43, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC) Neologism. Delete. --Slowking Man 07:32, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Flagrant violation of WP:DICT, the article is about the term, not any kind of encyclopedic concept. Transwikied...
Click to read more »August 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT. Battleaxe9872 Talk 12:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC) Delete. Contravenes WP:NOT#DICT. --DAJF (talk) 14:22, 2 August 2010...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Delete: per WP:DICT and WP:MADEUP. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 14:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOT#DICT // Timothy :: talk 08:24, 12 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »transwiki Daniel Case 04:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom; WP:NOT#DICT. --Muchness 04:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC) Delete as dicdef. -- Whpq 04:18...
Click to read more »1 January 2008 (UTC) Transwiki to Wiktionary. Clear violation of WP:NOT#DICT. Perhaps it could also be included in something like List of Internet Acronyms...
Click to read more »From Cleanup: Dict. def. Redirect Testicle? -- Cyrius | Talk 04:17, Apr 2, 2004 (UTC) Redirect Testicle. Niteowlneils 03:11, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC) Disambig:...
Click to read more »good reason to keep, dictionaries do not usually have glossaries, so WP:NOT#DICT doesn't apply. However, if it's been transwikied to Wiktionary, it may be...
Click to read more »around control measures put in place. RJFJR 19:14, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC) Delete. Dict def, and a bad one at that. Josh Cherry 19:57, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete....
Click to read more »proper names. Valuable advice for translations from German from a contributor dict.cc is a very handy online English-German/German-English dictionary. Annex...
Click to read more »"genesis". CaveatLector Talk Contrib 04:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT. I'm curious about why it would qualify for WP:NONSENSE, however. Estemi...
Click to read more »Wombat (talk) 12:46, 23 October 2021 (UTC) Keep -- I also read the Polish Bio Dict entry via Google Translate. It is clear that he was a leading figure supporting...
Click to read more »18.73 (t - c; 20) to wikt:es:amach (diff !top) - Link: www.ceantar.org/Dicts/MB2/index.html (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2012-01-23 18:28:01 (UTC): wikt:es:User:95...
Click to read more »stat_dict = {} for user,stats in user_stats.iteritems(): if query['name'] in stats: stat_dict[user] = stats[query['name']] stats = sorted(stat_dict.iteritems()...
Click to read more »undo) - Link: www.megaslovo.ru/kladez/dict/rifma.php. * Links added in this diff: www.megaslovo.ru/kladez/dict/rifma.php (2, 12, 1, 1) 2008-09-09 06:17:24...
Click to read more »Suffrage (CS) Suffrage (Dict.) Suffragists (WD) African-American suffragists (WD) This is a list focused on suffrage. It includes missing women biographies...
Click to read more »talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – Delete WP:DICT The term is probably specific to a particular country/local region, and has...
Click to read more »Looks like a slang dict. def. but is actually a POV rant directed to military police. Either way, delete it, please. jni 15:08, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »• Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 11 August 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEO, WP:NOT#DICT and WP:PROMOTION: the article's subject is another buzzword that was attached...
Click to read more »article on a specific discussion will probably be useful, but this is just a dict def. Transwiki to wiktionary. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 23:13, Nov...
Click to read more »Glossaries are not dictionaries. Citation to WP:DICT here is a complete misunderstanding of what WP:DICT says and means, making many of the comments here...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:DICT and WP:NEO New England Review Me!/Go Red Sox! 06:28, 26 August 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Recommended deletion per WP:NOT#DICT Nenyedi • (Deeds•Talk) 20:13, 19 August 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:DICT and WP:NEO New England Review Me!/Go Red Sox! 06:14, 26 August 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE From Cleanup: Inborn dict. def. (moved from Cleanup by SimonP) Dicdef, badly mangled by the creator...
Click to read more »pediphile for my taste. DCEdwards1966 03:55, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC) According to old dict i presently have at hand, a pediphile would have to be something along the...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#DICT KTC 08:46, 12 August 2007 (UTC) Delete, WP is not Urban Dictionary. Punkmorten...
Click to read more »error: Trailing \ in regex m/\bconexiondigital\/ at LinkSaver.pl line 5540. dict.aparajeyo.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en...
Click to read more »what about the terms that also show up in the real world? it's a mix!), WP:DICT (it's all a bunch of definitions), WP:RS (there are no citations to any sources...
Click to read more »if=en&E=0&F=V&Q=traktor (38, 399, 1, -3) dict.sztaki.hu/dict_search.php?O=ENG&flash=&E=1&vk=&in_form=1&L=HUN%3AENG%3AEngHunDict&W=traktor&M=1&P=0&C=1&T=1 (38, 43...
Click to read more »Capitalistroadster 17:01, 12 August 2005 (UTC) Keep historical value beyond a dict. entry Dottore So 22:59, 12 August 2005 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »test of notability" cab (talk) 19:14, 26 December 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 16:25, 26 December 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »logs | views) – (View log) Contested PROD; non - notable. Maybe NEO or NOT#DICT. Rjd0060 22:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete, it's an attack page...
Click to read more »Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:16, 2 September 2011 (UTC) Keep - I don't think this is a WP:DICT or random word; the article contains more than etymology and notability seems...
Click to read more »mention it in a dict-def kind of way, which Ready room already provides. The news.google.com pages also seem to ask just for a dict-def, so this article...
Click to read more »From vfd: From Cleanup: dict. def. Redirected. Keep. Dysprosia 01:03, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC) Comment by User:Aquarius_rising: Aug. 13/05: The problem with the...
Click to read more »Delete Dict def. Burgundavia 22:59, May 17, 2004 (UTC) Yup. Dicdef. - Lucky 6.9 23:11, 17 May 2004 (UTC) Exactly. Beelzebubs 23:14, 17 May 2004 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »logs | views) – (View log) Non-notable neoglism, fails WP:NEO and WP:NOT#DICT. Redfarmer (talk) 22:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete A1. So tagged...
Click to read more »62, 1, 1) www.muiswerk.nl/wrdnboek/ltr_h/w1084.htm (19, 49, 1, 1) dict.sztaki.hu/dict_search.php?l=hun%3aeng%3aenghundict&o=eng&w=hotel (19, 49, 1, 1)...
Click to read more »An article on a nonexistant word 'hyebeh' (neither dict.org nor google knows it). Besides, the article has nothing to do with what it's entitled. -Frazzydee...
Click to read more »OSbornarfcontributionatoration 17:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC) Delete as WP:NFT, WP:NEO, WP:DICT, or uncited...take your pick. DMacks 18:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »An article on a nonexistant word 'hyebeh' (neither dict.org nor google knows it). Besides, the article has nothing to do with what it's entitled. -Frazzydee...
Click to read more »are used in kickboxing. Most are also general usage terms. Violates WP:NOT#DICT. It's not an article about a "Kickboxing dictionary". It purports to be a...
Click to read more »words long) contributes no useful information. I also believe that WP:NOT#DICT also applies in this case.Davidpdx 10:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC) I was working...
Click to read more »be deleted. --Daniel J. Leivick 20:58, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Delete - per WP:DICT. Should go in the Wiktionary. -- Hot Dog Wolf Bark! 21:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »move to wiktionary list. A google search produces no results. A search on dict.org does not produce any results either. -[[User:Frazzydee|Frazzydee|✍]]...
Click to read more »did I screw up now?) 19:33, 31 August 2017 (UTC) So you think that WP:NOT#DICT somehow applies here? Care to elaborate? ~Kvng (talk) 19:47, 31 August 2017...
Click to read more »I'd never seen despite 4 years living in China (doh!). I'm a big fan of Dict.cn, for what it's worth. They both have iPhone/Android apps, however the...
Click to read more »kept on May 28, 2004 From Cleanup: Europe, the Middle East and Africa - dict. def. (I moved this to vfd from cleanup and fully support its deletion -...
Click to read more »some basic checking yourself: grep -ic 'e.*a' /usr/share/dict/words grep -ic 'a.*e' /usr/share/dict/words etc... AnonMoos (talk) 05:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »specific product, nor is it promotional. However, it's little more than a dict def, and that's not speedy allowed either. delete UtherSRG (talk) 09:52,...
Click to read more »Neologism dict def that appears to be advertising a website. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 16:53, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC) The advertising was inappropriate, but, more importantly...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result wasNo consensus WP:DICT is at best ambiguous it does say "Wikipedia is not a usage guide" yet with...
Click to read more »therefore not widely used. MER-C 12:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOT#DICT, WP:V, WP:NEO.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 18:34, 28 October 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 15:31, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) A one-line dict def, about what would appear to be a prediction about a forthcoming unnotable...
Click to read more »but this might be a better route. I will instead call attention to wp:not#dict as I do not see this as capable of becoming more than a dicdef. Mstuczynski...
Click to read more »split it). I also don't think it violates the spirit or intent of WP:NOT#DICT, either, as per the way the policy's worded, since the proposed cleanup involves...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete for now. Its just a definition of a word and violates WP:DICT Corpx Detete, that's what Wiktionary is for.— Preceding unsigned comment...
Click to read more »it's probably a protologism. --Gareth Hughes 13:53, 24 October 2005 (UTC) Dict. def. Transwiiki to Wiktionary. — Laura Scudder | Talk 20:19, 16 October...
Click to read more »error: Trailing \ in regex m/\bconexiondigital\/ at LinkSaver.pl line 5540. dict.aparajeyo.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en...
Click to read more »dictionary Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:30, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete dict def of a word with no Google hits out side of Wikipedia([1]), entirely unverifiable...
Click to read more »- DiligentTerrier (and friends)21:14, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT Ros0709 (talk) 22:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Keep seems an obviously notable...
Click to read more »here with no comment. Transwiki if it can be found anywhere else (not in dict.org or m-w.com) . — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 19:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Not English. Colonel Warden (talk) 07:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT -- JediLofty UserTalk 09:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Delete, probably meant as...
Click to read more »(UTC) If it's there correct information can be merged with Blowfly. This is dict. def. Delete. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 19:18, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:23, 12 October 2006 (UTC) Dict def can can never really be more than that. Possibly even attack article...
Click to read more »(View log) Prod removed last month without explanation. Violates WP:NOT#DICT. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 20:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC) Delete Wikipedia...
Click to read more »dantri.com.vn/default.aspx (462, 6, 3, 1) dict.vietfun.com (462, 11, 6, 1) www.myjavaserver.com/~~fastdict/AjaxDict.jsp#book:thesaurus (462, 19, 2, 1) www...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:DICT . Hammer1980·talk 16:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Redirect to Cross elasticity...
Click to read more »2-sentence sub stub, and if NPOV'd right now would end up as 1 sentence dict. def. (moved from Cleanup by SimonP) Keep. --Daniel C. Boyer 15:28, 24 Jun...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete In addition to notability problems, there is also a WP:NOT#DICT problem. The word "Bro" has a long history and means many different things...
Click to read more »(talk) 07:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC) Delete Not notable on its own and per WP:NOT#DICT GtstrickyTalk or C 00:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! GoldenDict (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »Deville (Talk) 21:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC) NN neologism. Reads like a dict def at that, but I doubt WT would want it Computerjoe's talk 12:03, 4 September...
Click to read more »dubious. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:56, 22 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT and lack of any sourcing/references. Wiw8 (talk) 22:43, 22 August 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »debate was delete. --Celestianpower háblame 20:47, 23 October 2005 (UTC) dict def, non encyclopedic cohesion | talk 04:23, 17 October 2005 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »it is WP:NOT. Burntsauce 16:03, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:DICT policy. --BlindEagletalk~contribs 16:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Delete - Per...
Click to read more »title=sie. * Links added in this diff: www.dict.cc/deutsch-englisch/sie.html (16, 150, 1, 1) pons.eu/dict/search/results/?q=sie&l=deen (16, 54, 1, 1)...
Click to read more »debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 23:53, 23 January 2006 (UTC) Just a dict defn. Not worthy here Delete Just the past tense of the verb 'commiserate'...
Click to read more »nonsense; urban dictionary isn't a reliable source and even if it was, it's a dict def. speedy perhaps? --Blowdart | talk 22:00, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »agree. YechielMan 06:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NFT and WP:NOT#DICT. -- IslaySolomon | talk 08:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per above and...
Click to read more »Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 01:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT, unless someone can rewrite it with sources. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page•...
Click to read more »/usr/share/dict/words | grep l | grep a | grep 't.*t' | grep e Instead of the first grep you can also use awk: awk length==5 /usr/share/dict/words | grep...
Click to read more »definition. --Infrangible 02:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC) Delete violates WP:NOT#DICT. Acalamari 21:10, 16 April 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »term. --Siva1979Talk to me 14:26, 22 July 2007 (UTC) Delete also per WP:NOT#DICT Corpx 16:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC) Transwiki to Wiktionary--Yannick 17:07, 22...
Click to read more »to meaning given in article. - Satori 01:31, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC) Delete. Dict-def. non-notable. (says converse rather than convey, translation to English...
Click to read more »WP:NOTDICT. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 01:43, 25 February 2010 (UTC) Delete not dict CTJF83 GoUSA 09:46, 26 February 2010 (UTC) Delete trivial. AbbaIkea2010 (talk)...
Click to read more »(UTC) I just tagged it to be transwikied. Once that is done, Delete as a dict-def. Pastordavid (talk) 20:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Has been transwikied...
Click to read more »much speed". It consists of: a dictionary definition (violation of WP:NOT#DICT) one line of advice (violation of WP:NOTADVICE) five lines of patent nonsense...
Click to read more »The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 02:28, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC) Dict def. Sort of. --W(t) 06:22, 2005 May 29 (UTC) Keep and cleanup/wikify. Notable...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete per WP:NOT#DICT. — TKD::Talk 20:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Badum ch (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOT#DICT. DannyS712 (talk) 01:10, 2 March 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Basically an unsourced dictdef, which conflicts with WP:NOT#DICT. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 15:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. Shalom...
Click to read more »Mgm|(talk) 11:46, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Unsourced neologism, and a dict-def at best. --Lockley (talk) 17:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Neologism...
Click to read more »contested. Basically a guide to how to write. Fails WP:NOT#GUIDE, WP:NOT#DICT. Redfarmer (talk) 16:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. Kakofonous...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article falls under WP:NOT#DICT. It actually is nothing more than the Indian word for "job", and I can't...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) Has had multiple prods, fails WP:NOT#DICT, it difficult to imagine how this long time unreferenced stub will ever become...
Click to read more »§FreeRangeFrog 22:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEO and WP:NOT#DICT Tavix (talk) 23:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »TWL) vanity page for slang term definition. Should be removed per WP:NOT#DICT Graywalls (talk) 02:25, 6 November 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »—gorgan_almighty 13:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC) Delete. Per gorgan_almighty, and per WP:NOT#DICT. Wiktionary definitely does not want this, Wiktionary is not Urban Dictionary...
Click to read more »WP:NOT#DICTIONARY. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 01:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOT#DICT --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 01:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »03:04:58: User en:ClueBot (talk - contribs) to en:Data (diff). Links: www.dict.org/bin/Dict?Form=Dict1&Query=data&Strategy=*&Database=* www.bris.ac...
Click to read more »It appears to be about a sexual slang referring to anal sex. Fails WP:NOT#DICT. A definition already exists at wikt:culear. This article was tagged for...
Click to read more »of the debate was delete. Joyous 19:45, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC) neologism. nn dict-def. Unsigned. Page history says: 19:08, 2004 Dec 29 User:Smadnani joining...
Click to read more »Single edit IP contested WP:PROD. Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOT#DICT) — Fly by Night (talk) 23:18, 17 June 2011 (UTC) Delete per nom. -- Alexf(talk)...
Click to read more »Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 16:31, 29 April 2012 (UTC) Delete -- per nom and not a dict. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 18:27, 29 April 2012 (UTC) Delete: Fails...
Click to read more »The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 14:17, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) Dict def Wikibofh 19:31, 31 May 2005 (UTC) Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary...
Click to read more »reliable source, it fails WP:N. In its present form, the article violates WP:DICT. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 03:12, 27 May 2008 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOT#DICT, should this be deleted or transwiki'd to English/French wiktionary? Tom...
Click to read more »cited policies Mbisanz (talk) 17:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT, which I think covers this precise situation. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk)...
Click to read more »Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 16:48, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete WP:DICT wikipedia is not a slang, usage or jargon guide, side note, a specific slang...
Click to read more »Delete From here, it doesn't seem to be coal at all. Anyhow, it fails WP:DICT. -=Elfin=-341 06:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC) Speedy Delete. One of the most...
Click to read more »the word, i.e. a dictionary entry and not an acceptable article per WP:NOT#DICT. There's a paragraph titled "Usage in English prisons" but the part that...
Click to read more »23:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC) Delete. I would have said WP:NEO, rather than WP:DICT. I can't find any evidence of use. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:28, 6 June 2008...
Click to read more »| links | watch | logs) (diff top?) - Link: philosophy.uwaterloo.ca/MindDict/tacitknowledge.html (R/Xmeta/L) 2014-10-20 07:08:41 (UTC): User Velvel2 t •...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOT#DICT // Timothy :: talk 17:00, 12 July 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICDEF. ~dom...
Click to read more »american-english' 'uses dictionary found in /usr/share/dict' def getpairs(): pairs = [] try: f = open("/usr/share/dict/american-english", "r") except IOError, e:...
Click to read more »diff: www.freeweb.hu/etymological/gagauzweb.htm (11, 386, 1, 1) dict.sztaki.hu/dict_search.php?o=eng&l=hun%3aeng%3aenghundict&w=akar&m=3&t=1 (11, 14...
Click to read more »make sure, Delete. --Sn0wflake 04:13, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC) Delete. WP not a dict. -- Mwanner 14:06, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive...
Click to read more »The result of the debate was to delete the article. From Cleanup: Quantity dict. def. - (I moved this to vfd from cleanup and fully support its deletion...
Click to read more »not. BlinkingBlimey (talk) 17:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT. (Note: I prodded this article; tag was removed by the article's creator...
Click to read more »not a dictionary. Jacchigua (talk) 18:33, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT. Effectively copied from here with the exception of two words. PeterSymonds...
Click to read more »this to Wictionary. --NoPetrol 01:32, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete. Made up dict. def. Do not transwiki. jni 17:01, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete straight out...
Click to read more »dictionary. Cliff smith talk 22:17, 8 September 2008 (UTC) Delete: per WP:DICT. Schuym1 (talk) 22:34, 8 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOT#DICT 8ya (talk • contribs) 13:58, 11 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »Dictionary. --djrobgordon 01:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC) Delete per above; slang dict def. --Muchness 03:18, 3 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as Wikipedia is not a dictionary...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC) dict def, very common phrase Darkfred Talk to me 04:48, 15 September 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »--Rocksanddirt (talk) 19:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC) Delete WP:NEO and WP:NOT#DICT. No independent reliable sources for verification. -Verdatum (talk) 19:23...
Click to read more »record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 03:10, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC) Dict def that probably doesn't even deserve to be moved to Wiktionary....
Click to read more »the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 02:13, 17 January 2006 (UTC) Dict-def. Delete -- Egil 17:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC) Delete, neologism def. PJM...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom -- Whpq 13:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT. Jayden54 14:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »in either case nn. Edeans 09:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT, should have been a {{prod}} not a AfD. Jeepday 14:55, 5 February 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »September 2007 (UTC) Delete not made up, but not notable either. WP:NOT#DICT. Hut 8.5 12:25, 15 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. No RS, and even if there...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) trivial (WP:DICT), non-notable; and unverifiable, as there is no one "American Indian" language...
Click to read more »for discussion. Maxim 23:12, 14 August 2007 (UTC) Speedy Delete per WP:NOT#DICT and WP:NEOSxeptomaniac 23:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC) That's not speedy deletion...
Click to read more »RULEZZZZ...!") --ssr (talk) 23:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT and WP:NEO. JohnCD (talk) 08:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC) When this becomes...
Click to read more »DELETE. Robert T | @ | C 01:39, 11 November 2005 (UTC) Foreign language dict-def. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Allen3 talk 20:43, 5 November 2005...
Click to read more »page. The result was Keep for now, but it needs to be expanded beyond a dict-def to deal with issues brought up here. Chillum 00:19, 23 July 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »--Nick—Contact/Contribs 19:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:NOT#DICT. Joe Chill (talk) 21:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom. May belong...
Click to read more »encyclopedia article. It's a rambling, sort-of dab page, sort-of extended dict def. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:55, 2 June 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »appear to be a number of commercial sites that use the term [1] however WP:DICT Deadly∀ssassin 21:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »01:34, 3 July 2020 (UTC) Delete. No assertion of notability. Zero sources. A dict def on its best day. --Lockley (talk) 04:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »itself. I can't see how this could be expanded to be encyclopedic. WP:NOT#DICT, WP:NEO. Redfarmer (talk) 20:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC) Delete. The sheer...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom. Latinus 21:47, 23 January 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom, dict def neologism. --Muchness 22:23, 23 January 2006 (UTC) Delete as non-notable...
Click to read more »AllyUnion (talk) 05:43, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC) Slang term for cocaine. Basically a dict.def. Should move to Wiktionary. — Brim 22:16, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC) Wikify, grammaticalize...
Click to read more »achieve notability. Leebo T/C 16:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT. Spellcast 16:17, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per above. Corpx 16:45, 22 June...
Click to read more »the term." JohnCD (talk) 14:35, 27 August 2009 (UTC) Delete both Per NOT#DICT, NEO as above. no notability, no source, no common usage--ClubOranjeT 10:29...
Click to read more »definitely gobbledegook. Edeans 08:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT, as the term is not noted on the page Volatility editors of that page may...
Click to read more »Nothing more than a one sentence definition. No references. Orphaned. Fails WP:DICT Rtphokie (talk) 01:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Keep. As this is a topic of...
Click to read more »Flowerparty■ 23:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC) Prev. prodded, but prod was removed. Simple Dict-def. Redundant to Wikiary. --- ---J.Smith 21:20, 10 March 2006 (UTC) Move...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Strong delete - let's face it, we need a new speedy cat for WP:DICT violations, or at least WP:NEO ones. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:28, 3 April...
Click to read more »egrep -i "^($r($l$r)*$l|$l($r$l)*$r?)\$" /usr/dict/words egrep -i "^($r($l$r)*$l?|$l($r$l)*$r?)\$" /usr/dict/words On this system, with 235,882 words in...
Click to read more »The article is 100% unreferenced violating WP:V, and also violates WP:NOT#DICT. Therefore I close this 3rd AfD with Delete ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 23:08, 29 September...
Click to read more »WP:NOT#DICT Jeepday 04:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Delete if it can't be expanded. Xiner (talk, email) 04:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT but...
Click to read more »sources. Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 14:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC) Delete, per WP:NOT#DICT, and WP:NEO. Nenyedi • (Deeds•Talk) 16:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC) Delete -...
Click to read more »if sufficient usage can be found. Otherwise, delete, as it fails WP:NOT#DICT.--Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:04, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »05:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC) Delete and don't transwiki. A quick google and dict. search returns nothing related to this meaning. — Graibeard (talk) 00:16...
Click to read more »December 2007 (UTC) Delete no assertion of notability. Maybe transwiki as a dict def? Vegaswikian (talk) 01:32, 18 December 2007 (UTC) Delete - the references...
Click to read more »context. There are a number of online DE dicos. Our Austrian interns like dict.cc which is crowdsourced. I prefer leo online, especially for its usage forum...
Click to read more »Delete for oh so many reasons: at best a neologism, more likely a hoax, dict-def, little or no context. Pascal.Tesson 19:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »similar entries in an y other encyclopedia I can find, including Grove's Dict. of Music George 21:02, 11 September 2005 (UTC) Delete. Real term, actual...
Click to read more »transwiki. -- Hoary 01:39, 16 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NOT#DICT. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 05:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom....
Click to read more »no claim to be notable --T-rex 05:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC) Delete - per WP:DICT, meaning that this is just a slang translation. The common person would think...
Click to read more »but none relevant. CDC (talk) 19:29, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete non-notable dict-def. RJFJR 06:37, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC) Delete.Mikkalai 17:22, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »are). [[User:Livajo|力伟|☺]] 20:17, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC) delete looks like a dict def, actually vanity (with a phone number at the end) Mozzerati 20:24, 2004...
Click to read more »to find any reliable sources about this term, which fails WP:NEO and WP:DICT. Part of the page appears to be a copyvio of http://www.awakeningonline.org/index...
Click to read more »au/ebooks15/1500721h/0-dict-biogN-O.html https://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks15/1500721h/0-dict-biogN-O.html https://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks15/1500721h/0-dict-biogP-Q.html...
Click to read more »JohnCD (talk) 16:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC) Delete as per nom and also WP:NOT#DICT Bardcom (talk) 16:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC) Delete Rooot (talk) 16:42, 19...
Click to read more »September 2005 (UTC) Move to Wiktionary I can't see this being any more than a dict def. Malo 04:05, 21 September 2005 (UTC) Delete, I'm not ready to call this...
Click to read more »the wiktionary. -- RyRy5 (talk) 15:26, 27 June 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT DCEdwards1966 15:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC) Transwiki to Wikitionairy. Steve...
Click to read more »logs | views) – (View log) Article is unsourced and violates WP:NEO, WP:DICT. Note that article was prodded and the tag was removed. PKT (talk) 15:24...
Click to read more »241 (talk) 12:21, 3 January 2011 (UTC) Delete, not because it violates WP:DICT (it doesn't) but because it's completely unsourced and violates WP:Verifiability...
Click to read more »TWL) Does not seem like a valid term; WP:OR and no sources.. Possible WP:DICT problem. — Timneu22 · talk 17:41, 20 October 2010 (UTC) Delete per nom -Drdisque...
Click to read more »Discussion concluded and article kept on June 14, 2004 From Cleanup: Gadget - dict. def. (moved from Cleanup by SimonP) Delete. Johnleemk | Talk 15:15, 8 Jun...
Click to read more »19:41, 1 August 2010 (UTC) Transwiki and delete per Quiddity and WP:NOT#DICT. --Slon02 (talk) 22:18, 1 August 2010 (UTC) Delete here, if it goes to some...
Click to read more »don't see how this is advertising. Looks more like a violation of WP:NOT#DICT to me. Redfarmer (talk) 00:35, 29 January 2008 (UTC) agreed, I must have...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOT#DICT - the one ref is just a definition, and several searches for this term yielded...
Click to read more »(Check!) 08:52, 20 April 2006 (UTC) Prod tag added by User:Bikeable due to "dict def that I can't find elsewhere, and WP:NOT a dictionary". Prod is suspended...
Click to read more »Neoleetism. --Carnildo 22:43, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) WP is not a leet-speak dict. del BigFatDave 23:14, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) Add this to the Leet article and...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Jargon definition. WP:NOT#DICT —Ketil Trout (<><!) 22:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC) Transwiki to Wiktionary. MER-C...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep (SNOW) Does anyone seriously think sources can't be found? Not a dict def, similar non-dictdef articles on things are Box etc. Nom overlooks it...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Wikipedia is not a dictionary. wp:DICT Bit Lordy (talk) 15:26, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Delete Will never evolve beyond...
Click to read more »to Wiktionary. P.B. Pilhet 21:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT. Ketsuekigata (talk) 22:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Longstanding unsourced stub. I think WP:DICT WP:NEO applies here. Mattg82 (talk) 22:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »nonnotable yet. Mukadderat 18:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:NEO and WP:NOT#DICT ffm 23:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC) Delete per Firefoxman. CRGreathouse (t |...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DICT CTJF83 00:25, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Soft-redirect & protect: Since this is...
Click to read more »nom. AvruchTalk 13:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC) Delete - it either fails WP:DICT or WP:OR. Either way, it should be nuked. --BlindEagletalk~contribs 16:55...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DICT. Non-notable phrase. Redirect to rabbi. Longhornsg (talk) 02:18, 11 August...
Click to read more »Redirect, agree. -- Chris 01:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Redirect - this is a dict defn. Redirect as per Gazpacho. ManoaChild 02:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 'Redirect...
Click to read more »It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:40, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Comment: was copied to Wiktionary...
Click to read more »Bear Arms", a subject already covered in Right to arms: Nomination per WP:DICT. Estemi (talk) 07:13, 19 May 2008 (UTC) Merge and redirect to right to arms...
Click to read more »dictionary of neologisms.-Fagles 23:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT, the article exactly reads like a dictionary entry. Wooyi 02:03, 22 February...
Click to read more »(UTC) But the fact that a term "is used" doesn't make it notable. See WP:NOT#DICT. The notability guideline requires multiple sources that discuss the term...
Click to read more »result was keep. Consensus has been established that subject is more than a dict def, and that it should be kept (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 16:42...
Click to read more »result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC) Neologism and dict def. Unverified. eaolson 03:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. -- Gogo...
Click to read more »appears to be merely a dictionary definition, which conflicts with WP:NOT#DICT. — X S G 04:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC) Keep. The article is more than...
Click to read more »with love" indeed... --Charlene 08:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC) Delete NOT WP:NOT#DICT. Moving the article to wikidictionary wouldnt be a good thing as this article...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Non-notable dict-def. Blowdart | talk 13:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICDEF.--Boffob...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. It's either an article about a word, in which case WP:NOT#DICT, or about a company, in which case it meets {{db-empty}} criteria. GregorB...
Click to read more »which (as Kev) has more usage but no page. More importantly, I think WP:DICT - although slang, it is still essentially a dictionary definition. Wiktionary...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was merge to StarDict. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 21 August 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »28 July 2021 (UTC) D (corp) Draft:Silk Road Environmental (22 days) D (dict) Draft:Usteq (34 days) D (context) Draft:Take home exposures (84 days) A...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) It's just a dictionary entry and fails WP:NOT#DICT. I can't see any societal aspect that could serve as the basis of an article...
Click to read more »expanding. Cultural significance, history, etc... Otherwise, it falls under WP:DICT and should be deleted. Bardcom (talk) 01:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »encyclopedic. At best a list of dictdefs, many of them neologisms. See WP:NOT#DICT. Also the page title is incorrect. Demonym refers to a place name, not a...
Click to read more »WP:NOTE. TheJazzDalek (talk) 13:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:NOT#DICT. Joe Chill (talk) 17:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#OR, WP:NOT#DICT, just to name a few of the policies this article fails. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞...
Click to read more »(and already TWed). -- MarcoTolo 16:32, 18 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT. Bart133 (t) (c) 17:38, 18 July 2007 (UTC) Delete. Dictionary definition...
Click to read more »term, not suitable for general encyclopedia per WP:NOTEVERYTHING, WP:NOT#DICT. If at all it is a software program than a technical term, it fails WP:NSOFT...
Click to read more »Delete There already is wiktionary:SOB (weak transwiki there?), and WP:NOT#DICT (which is also true for dab pages). – sgeureka t•c 19:00, 30 August 2008...
Click to read more »redirect. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:20, 2 May 2009 (UTC) Delete both, per WP:DICT and as duplications of each other, though I'd be fine with one or both being...
Click to read more »does not accept such lists, which would prove that it does not fail WP:NOT#DICT. Also, this should be kept per the WP:CONSENSUS of hundreds of editors who...
Click to read more »Wikibooks Cookbook. Vegaswikian 06:08, 19 May 2005 (UTC) Reads like poor dict-def. Needs context and needs expansion. As is, delete as trivial. --Simon...
Click to read more »comment was added at 21:49, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Delete: Per above (NEO, DICT, N). - Rjd0060 04:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC) Delete NEO Balloonman 06:04...
Click to read more »does not accept such lists, which would prove that it does not fail WP:NOT#DICT. Also, this should be kept per the WP:CONSENSUS of hundreds of editors who...
Click to read more »WP:CRYSTAL Bazj (talk) 05:56, 12 June 2015 (UTC) Delete - WP:COI and WP:NOT#DICT. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The article is a proposed bankruptcy legal...
Click to read more »--Hirohisat Kiwi 05:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Delete - per above. Fails WP:NOT#DICT. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 06:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Obvious....
Click to read more »Illinois2011 (talk) 08:27, 27 March 2011 (UTC) Delete Per nom and WP:NOT#DICT. Monty845 08:47, 27 March 2011 (UTC) Also, as many pen caps have holes in...
Click to read more »improving. --Maltrich 03:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC) Delete for now, per WP:NOT#DICT - Nothing but a definition now which can easily be re-added when/if recreated...
Click to read more »already included here. SkierRMH 06:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:NOT#DICT, Wiktionary already has it. Hut 8.5 10:01, 20 October 2007 (UTC) Delete dictionary...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT. This information (and related information on other printer designations)...
Click to read more »WP:BEFORE shows little-to-no usage as a term, which fails both WP:GNG and WP:NOT#DICT. DannyS712 (talk) 00:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »things. --Tautomers(T C) 00:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT. Caleb Stanford (talk) 05:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) per WP:DICT. I propose redirecting to bisexuality or soft redirecting to wikt:ambisexual...
Click to read more »consider "an other" as a match.[3] JulesH 18:03, 9 September 2006 (UTC) delete dict def, if not neologism hoax, perhaps a move to wictionary (if verified). --Darkfred...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Declining speedy and elevating for discussion. Tech dict def. delete UtherSRG (talk) 12:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »and 5 votes for (a subsequent) Redirect. Uncle G 21:00, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC) Dict-def (computer slang). Should be transwiki-ed to wiktionary and deleted. RJFJR...
Click to read more »has to be more than a definition otherwise it should be deleted per WP:NOT#DICT, and in this case, WP:NEOTheBilly (talk) 06:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Weak...
Click to read more »files in Pages by default. Here's what mine looks like for MS Word files: <dict> <key>LSHandlerContentType</key> <string>com.microsoft.word.doc</string>...
Click to read more »this. rootology (T) 03:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC) Delete Wikipedia is not a WP:DICT of minor, unnotable items. Artene50 (talk) 08:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »can be created which does not violate the spirit of WP:NOTESSAY and NOT#DICT. I now think it would be better to go back to my original attempt: delete...
Click to read more »DeleteDict def Burgundavia 08:27, May 16, 2004 (UTC) Delete, dicdef. DO'Neil 08:30, 16 May 2004 (UTC)...
Click to read more »no sources, neologism. JIP | Talk 06:04, 30 August 2008 (UTC) Nothing at dict.org. The article telegraph.co.uk mentions "Johns Hopkins University professor...
Click to read more »neologism. Óðinn (talk) 08:06, 17 December 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom plus WP:DICT. Ros0709 (talk) 08:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. tgies (talk)...
Click to read more »--Moonriddengirl 01:24, 1 September 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom., and WP:NOT#DICT. Could be transwikied however to the Wiktionary. Nenyedi • (Deeds•Talk) 01:29...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Wikipedia is not a dictionary WP:NOT#DICT. I can't think of a way that this will grow into more than a dictionary piece...
Click to read more »/Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:25, 29 November 2009 (UTC) Delete — Useless, WP:DICT ContinueWithCaution (talk) 03:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTDICT...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Wikipedia is not a dictionary, per WP:DICT. Gary King (talk) 16:43, 19 February 2008 (UTC) If Obamakin was a word used...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:NOT a dictionary - WP:DICT. Note that this is part of Category:Latin mottos, just about all of which...
Click to read more »Christianity. Mebigrouxboy (talk) 22:04, 31 August 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT. This article can only be a dictionary definition, and Wiktionary would be...
Click to read more ».. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 15:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Delete as non-notable neologism;...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Delete. Dict-def, already an entry at wikitionary.[1]. Pastordavid (talk) 22:22, 10 December...
Click to read more »sources. Nordic Nightfury 11:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC) Delete -Violates WP:NOT#DICT, also the last line, "Southend Triathlon will support up to 200 local athletes...
Click to read more »does not accept such lists, which would prove that it does not fail WP:NOT#DICT. Also, this should be kept per the WP:CONSENSUS of hundreds of editors who...
Click to read more »encyclopedic. JuJube 04:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC) Delete: Again, per NEO or DICT. - Rjd0060 04:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC) Transwiki to Wiktionary. It's a valid...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT - This is a list of terms and their definitions, which is what a dictionary...
Click to read more »organizations rarely ever need a stand-alone article, but usually deserve a brief dict-def-like description somewhere as a search term and to establish context...
Click to read more »March 2008 (UTC) Transwiki to Wiktionary. WP:DICT. —Snthdiueoa (talk|contribs) 09:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC) WP:DICT is not applicable - please read it to see...
Click to read more »- The Bushranger One ping only 22:38, 22 June 2012 (UTC) Delete - per WP:DICT, I don't see any WP:RS that might make this phrase otherwise notable. - The...
Click to read more »in July 2007. Peter Isotalo 18:26, 4 January 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT. JohnCD (talk) 21:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC) Transwiki anything appropriate...
Click to read more »colloquial English. Gordonofcartoon 00:48, 27 July 2007 (UTC) Delete: WP:DICT is very clear about "slang, jargon, or usage guides". It's also probably...
Click to read more »orphaned page, nothing more than definition. proposing deletion per WP:NOT#DICT Rtphokie (talk) 15:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Transwiki to Wiktionary. Entry...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Violates WP:NOTDICTIONARY and WP:NOT#DICT Curb Chain (talk) 07:25, 13 October 2012 (UTC) Delete But I would like to...
Click to read more »does not accept such lists, which would prove that it does not fail WP:NOT#DICT. Also, this should be kept per the WP:CONSENSUS of hundreds of editors who...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) DICT DEF. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 16:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Delete. Not just...
Click to read more »this notice. Thanks, - Flori4nK t • c 14:11, 18 July 2020 (UTC) Delete as dict def. The Cradock articles are quite entertaining, thank you for that, but...
Click to read more »SJB (talk) 10:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO, WP:NOT#DICT.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:27, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Glossary --SJB...
Click to read more »June 2006 (failing WP:ATT), and exists to define a term (failing WP:NOT#DICT). Due to the lack of suitable sources the contents are indistinguishable...
Click to read more »result was keep. I note, aside from the arguments already below, that WP:DICT does not discuss vocabulary, but rather individual words. Glossaries have...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Per WP:NOT#DICT, "stubs with no possibility for expansion". (Unless you think we can establish...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOT#DICT. I'm leaving the page as-is for now, so others can see its state as I saw...
Click to read more »either.- (User) WolfKeeper (Talk) 23:20, 18 March 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT. Prewitt81 (talk) 23:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC) Keep This article has potential...
Click to read more »fart.com/fart/dict_en_es/fart/revent%f3n. * Links added in this diff: nark.rae.es/draei/shut (3, 1, 1, 1) education.fart.com/fart/dict_en_es/fart/revent%f3n...
Click to read more »advertisement--TBCTaLk?!? 01:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC) Delete per above, no sources, no dict, nn. Crum375 01:58, 26 June 2006 (UTC) Delete, dicdef, fails WP:SPAM. --Coredesat...
Click to read more »simply wrong. WP:NOT 1redrun Talk 11:33, 5 September 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:NOT#DICT. -- GarbageCollection - !Collect 12:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »sense. Turgidson (talk) 01:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT unless anyone can explain the significance of this. I find that India-related...
Click to read more »of musicians, therefore it is not significant coverage (see also WP:NOT#DICT). P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »and the article contains more than a definition so I don't think WP:NOT#DICT / WP:WINAD applies. --Pixelface (talk) 10:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Comment...
Click to read more »dictdef, neologism.-Clipdude 01:15, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete. Neologistic dict-def. — Pt (T) 01:18, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC) Delete -- DCEdwards1966 03:18, Jan...
Click to read more »—Talk contribs email 12:53, 14 August 2010 (UTC) Delete - fails at WP:NOT#DICT. Wiktionary might find a home for it, but it is not encyclopedic content...
Click to read more »BOLD and redirect anytime they like. -Splash 18:05, 4 August 2005 (UTC) Dict def. I'd say redirect to hip hop music, no merge neccessary. --FuriousFreddy...
Click to read more »verify the point and to read more. dict.cc is a very handy online English-German/German-English dictionary. dict.leo.org by LEO de.wiktionary.org linguee...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Should be deleted per WP:DICT, could find no usage making the term sufficiently notable for an article...
Click to read more »removed it with no reason cited. I see no reason to keep it. Un-sourced dict-def that gives more doubts than anything. Delete Renata 03:01, 12 February...
Click to read more »possible vandalism, possible copyvio, nonsense, and, on top of that, WP:NOT#DICT. Redfarmer (talk) 03:57, 2 February 2008 (UTC) Snowball delete. If I was...
Click to read more »history. TallNapoleon (talk) 09:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Delete Suffers from dict-def'iness and lacking notability. – sgeureka t•c 15:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:53, 6 September 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT. The phrase is already listed on List of Latin phrases. I added the reference...
Click to read more »WP:WIND Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 19:46, 11 March 2006 (UTC) delete as dict def. OhNoitsJamieTalk 23:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC) delete (transwiki if wiktionary...
Click to read more »new material that isn't suited for Deer stalking. Likely runs afoul of WP:DICT. DuckWrangler97 (talk) 20:05, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...
Click to read more »--Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC) Speedy snow delete: Fails WP:NOT#DICT. Tiptoety (talk) 23:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »I would like to hear more discussion about how this term relates to WP:DICT; in particular, the part that says "To support an article about a particular...
Click to read more »hits. --NathanHawking 07:10, 2004 Oct 17 (UTC) Delete. non-notable slang dict. def. Not encyclopedic. jni 12:36, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC) Delete. Does deserve...
Click to read more »absent creative redirecting. Monty845 19:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC) Delete - Dict def and also a synthesis. Typical problem with combining two factors (or...
Click to read more »statistic, explanations, etc., current article definitely fits into WP:NOT#DICT, and deserves to be nuked. The article is almost devoid of content right...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.askoxford.com/results/?view=dict&freesearch=helter+skelter&branch=13842570&textsearchtype=exact (R/Xmeta/L)...
Click to read more »Tavix (talk) 18:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC) Delete. Pretty obvious case of WP:DICT. I42 (talk) 18:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC) Delete, speedy per snowball: it's...
Click to read more »citations. For this article to be valid, it would have to adhere to WP:NOT#DICT and WP:NOR which it looks like it is struggling to do at the moment.--h i...
Click to read more »22:59, 5 September 2007 (UTC) Delete nothing more than an unsourced neo dict entry. Could just as easily go in Emo (slang). Mark Chovain 00:02, 6 September...
Click to read more »recently by User:SimonP who gave the justification of "No content beyond dict def, no refs for a decade". However, the PROD was procedurally declined as...
Click to read more »Delete. Resistance is futile. — Phil Welch 23:54, 29 May 2005 (UTC) Delete dict. def. of questionable accuracy. - SimonP 03:42, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC) This page...
Click to read more »(UTC) Weak delete While notable, WP:WINAD & this is nothing more than a dict. def. right now. --Karnesky 13:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC) Keep Anatomy article...
Click to read more »and then changed to a sort of dictionary definition, which also fails WP:DICT. gm_matthew (talk) 16:35, 3 July 2008 (UTC) Delete - Originally was an article...
Click to read more »←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 11:55, 4 June 2021 (UTC) /usr/share/dict/words on my computer also has beng, teng, dreng, steng, spreng, streng for...
Click to read more »and peacock wording and it's a one-sentence definition. per nom, WP:NOT#DICT --Sfmammamia (talk) 03:35, 8 February 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »please dump the content onto wiktionary and replace the wikipedia page with {{dict}} -- Zondor 07:51, 18 February 2006 (UTC) Redirect to Informant. Adrian~enwiki...
Click to read more »my darling Deleted JuJube 01:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT, neologism etc. aside. --Shirahadasha 01:56, 21 January 2007 (UTC) Speedy...
Click to read more »would be better to delete the article. My rationale has four aspects: WP:NOT#DICT This is Wikipedia not Wiktionary, and the article consists solely of two...
Click to read more »links. Pburka (talk) 03:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Delete or Transwiki as a dict def. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Merge with Cathay Pacific...
Click to read more »deleted. GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 09:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT. And wiktionary already has this info. Transwiki The article appears to be...
Click to read more »Master Thief Garrett 22:40, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) Looks like it belongs in the dict, and it is. It seems that the problem has been solved to me, so we can del...
Click to read more »Zero Kitsune (talk) 02:24, 22 June 2008 (UTC) Delete Wikipedia is not a WP:DICT and this 3.5 year old article is only a stub. Artene50 (talk) 04:44, 22 June...
Click to read more »risks), this article is only an etymology of the term. Delete per WP:NOT#DICT. menaechmi (talk) 13:27, 26 July 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »reasoning of Dom Kaos. If this phrase deserves any coverage, it would be as a dict def. --Lockley (talk) 19:44, 17 July 2020 (UTC) Comment: And, obviously,...
Click to read more »does not accept such lists, which would prove that it does not fail WP:NOT#DICT. Also, this should be kept per the WP:CONSENSUS of hundreds of editors who...
Click to read more »research. --MarkSweep 06:14, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete. Doesn't belong here. also dict-def, non-notable and non-sense. RJFJR 06:17, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC) Delete. Made...
Click to read more »December 2009 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:NOT#DICT. Joe Chill (talk) 17:14, 13 December 2009 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NOT#DICT -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:01...
Click to read more »or better quality) at Wiktionary, then definitely delete per nom (WP:NOT#DICT). Black Falcon 08:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:WINAD and standard...
Click to read more »creator in three weeks, so taking it to AFD. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NRVE, WP:NOT#DICT, WP:NOT#OR Seems to be a content fork from Internet meme to define the creator's...
Click to read more »(UTC) Desairology (discussion|history|protect|delete|undelete|logs|links) dict def of a topic that has few Google hits Lars T. 23:55, 10 November 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »article stub Municipal theatre begins with a dictionary description (WP:NOT#DICT). All additional description of the article subject is about what the subject...
Click to read more »stubs grow into are very different from dictionary articles. -- from WP:DICT It is not appropriate on Wikipedia because it is unlikely to grow anything...
Click to read more »specifically about the term". Cordovao (talk) 17:36, 2 May 2009 (UTC) Delete - WP:DICT, WP:NEOLOGISM, WP:V, and WP:N all apply here --Miskwito (talk) 17:57, 2 May...
Click to read more »December 2007 (UTC) Delete as in-universe fancruft, also inviolation of WP:NOT#DICT. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:44, 2 December 2007...
Click to read more »– Gurch 02:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Delete per noms ghits. Neologism dict def. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. -- IslaySolomon | talk 03:21, 30 November...
Click to read more »creator. nneonneo talk 00:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEO and WP:NOT#DICT. The term was not coined by the article creator however: article does contain...
Click to read more »Capitalistroadster 23:50, 16 May 2005 (UTC) Delete or Merge somewhere. This is more of a dict-def. I'm not even sure that the article as written is even correct. Vegaswikian...
Click to read more »debate was KEEP. --TenOfAllTrades(talk) 23:52, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) Compound dict-def, neologism. --W(t) 02:09, 2005 May 29 (UTC) Keep and expand. Article...
Click to read more »of coverage in any reliable source. Also a clearcut violation of WP:NOT#DICT (specifically section 3. regarding slang, and idiom guides). Lastly, seemingly...
Click to read more »national conventions is unsourced and WP:UNDUE here. There's a bad set of dict-defs and disambiguation content mixed in. I don't see a need to rename this...
Click to read more »Bearian 16:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per various criteria inc WP:NOT#DICT and WP:ATT EyeSereneTALK 08:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC) Delete or move to Wikitionary...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom--Zxcvbnm 17:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corpx (talk • contribs) Delete, Just...
Click to read more »in this reference. Erechtheus (talk) 05:42, 4 April 2009 (UTC) Delete WP:DICT and WP:N Judicatus | Talk | Contributions 05:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC) Delete:...
Click to read more »widespread use or use in particularly notable. I suggest trans-wiki the term as a dict-def. Pastordavid 21:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »TexasAndroid (talk) 14:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Move to Wiktionary Fails WP:NOT#DICT. States that, "Although articles should begin with a definition and description...
Click to read more »iscussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC) Delete WP:NOT#DICT. 'Nuff said. ΣΑΠΦ (Sapph)Talk 16:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC) Redirect to ostrich...
Click to read more »Delete or transwiki voters bring forward that this is essentially a slang dict-def per WP:NOT#DICTIONARY per the second argument there. A small majority...
Click to read more »fully. DGG (talk) 02:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC) Keep. Clearly more then a dict def and very notable. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »sourced there with numerous references and footnotes. Wikipedia is not a WP:DICT for other less well known forms of racism. Artene50 (talk) 01:47, 17 July...
Click to read more »delete. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 07:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC) Apparent neologism. Dict def. Unsourced. Can't find any support for this via Google. Author points...
Click to read more »I just installed a much better /usr/share/dict/words and I've been having fun grepping through it. It has five words with at least five vowels in a row:...
Click to read more »worldwide computer simulation fooling all senses". This seems like WP:OR and WP:DICT. <3 bunny 20:32, 9 February 2008 (UTC) Delete - Wikipedia is not a dictionary...
Click to read more »does not accept such lists, which would prove that it does not fail WP:NOT#DICT. Also, this should be kept per the WP:CONSENSUS of hundreds of editors who...
Click to read more »e r e s e a r c h 22:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NEO and WP:DICT, specifically, and I quote from the first line: Wikipedia is not a dictionary...
Click to read more »content.Bjones (talk) 15:51, 4 February 2010 (UTC) Delete both: Per WP:NOT#DICT. Joe Chill (talk) 22:35, 4 February 2010 (UTC) Delete, content doesn't justify...
Click to read more »dictionary. Springnuts (talk) 12:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NOT#DICT. Possibly could be merged into List of U.S. Army acronyms and expressions...
Click to read more »Chat 13:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom., WP:NEO and WP:NOT#DICT. JohnCD (talk) 13:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC) Strong Keep - The article is...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Per WP:DICT and WP:NEO. The result of the debate nearly two years ago was Keep, but the...
Click to read more »Stifle (talk) 12:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete it's not even a dict-def, the page admits it's a made up name. It's an advert pure and simple...
Click to read more »Template:DorlandsDict (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) As stated here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#Template DorlandsDict, the link...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Etymologies belong in a dictionary, delete per WP:NOT#DICT Gnevin (talk) 13:05, 15 July 2011 (UTC) Comment The article is one of a substantial...
Click to read more »Wiktionary. Cliff smith talk 01:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC) Delete. Bad dict. def. Equendil Talk 08:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC) Comment, I have no idea...
Click to read more »Transfer to wikitionary, or Redirect to other moon-related topics, per WP:NOT#DICT. A good scientific term but no need to list independently. Wooyi 19:42, 4...
Click to read more »16:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Delete - Probably not G1, but definitely Wikipedia:DICT. Livitup (talk) 17:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Delete - Wikipedia is not a dictionary...
Click to read more »notable. --TheGrimReaper 13:37, 13 December 2009 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NOT#DICT and does anyone every actually say that one? -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs)...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Wikipedia is not a dictionary. WP:DICT. I do not see any scope for any of the three definitions provided to be expanded...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOT#DICT: The subject is unencyclopedic. No inline citation, and none of the sources...
Click to read more »6 March 2010 (UTC) Woncheuk (history · last edit) from http://buddhism-dict.net/cgi-bin/xpr-ddb.pl?57.xml+id%28%27b5713-6e2c%27%29. OTRS Ticket:2010022610013647...
Click to read more »if anyone wants to write an article on this the fact that we deleted this dict-def won't hinder them. --W(t) 13:21, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC) Delete it's been a...
Click to read more »deleted first. --W.marsh 16:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC) Delete Strong POV and dict def issues. Mbisanz (talk) 07:54, 28 December 2007 (UTC) Delete and redirect...
Click to read more »Kww 21:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:N, WP:OR (possibly,) WP:NOT#DICT OSbornarf 21:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Non-notable neologism, and...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) Wikipedia is not a jargon guide, per WP:NOT#DICT. Edit: article has been deleted before from uncontested Prod. RazorICE 09:10...
Click to read more »explain a theatrical term which is possibly best left to Wiktionary as per WP:DICT. There are no sources to support the essay. SilkTork *SilkyTalk 08:15, 6...
Click to read more »WP:NOT#DICT, which precisely covers an article of this type. I see no need to address other policy issues. A glossary itself violates WP:NOT#DICT regardless...
Click to read more »Delete per nom. ← ANAS Talk? 20:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT, in addition to OR/lack of RS as noted by nom. Article provides no more information...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Just a definition which violates WP:DICT. There's not really anything written about the saying like when it was coined...
Click to read more »below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 23:51, 30 October 2016 (UTC) WP:NOT#DICT This "article" is better suited for a biographical dictionary of the cinema...
Click to read more »dict def. Some historical significance in the naming of mathematical concepts. --Salix alba (talk) 10:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Keep - more than a dict def...
Click to read more »language words which are more widespread in use, but would still violate WP:NOT#DICT hence us not having an article on these words. h i s s p a c e r e s e a...
Click to read more »original research. Stifle (talk) 17:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT and WP:OR. NASCAR Fan24(radio me!) 19:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC) Delete, unless...
Click to read more »does not accept such lists, which would prove that it does not fail WP:NOT#DICT. Also, this should be kept per the WP:CONSENSUS of hundreds of editors who...
Click to read more »-- Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:52, 17 June 2008 (UTC) delete - at best a dict-def, but more likely NN. WegianWarrior (talk) 09:47, 17 June 2008 (UTC) delete...
Click to read more »Absolutely no encyclopaedic content; it is like an extreme form of WP:NOT#DICT. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Names of European cities in different...
Click to read more »violates our policy at WP:What Wikipedia is not, as the article looks like WP:DICT. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 04:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »^_^ JuJube (talk) 04:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC) Delete Neologism; per WP:NOT#DICT #2 JeremyMcCracken (talk) 04:33, 27 March 2008 (UTC) Delete. It's not that...
Click to read more »1 February 2007 (UTC) Transwiki/Delete to Wikitionary. This seems like dict-def, but it really doesn't explain what it is, so it might be better to just...
Click to read more »use the many available sources to pass WP:GNG as an article (rather than a dict def). Widefox; talk 22:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC) Keep and rename to Autoconstructive...
Click to read more »The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 06:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC) DictDef. Maybe should be transwikied to Wictionary? -- RoySmith (talk) 22:06,...
Click to read more »is not cleanup. Warden (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT - Tying together every use of the word in rodeo, confinement, torture, and...
Click to read more »refuted - both verifiable and true. Isofar as "only a word" refers to WP:DICT, this deletion argument has also been shown to be wrong. No delete !votes...
Click to read more »(View log) Doesn't seem to be notable enough of a term, fails WP:NEO and WP:DICT. Dougie WII (talk) 12:14, 23 December 2007 (UTC) Delete – Agree could find...
Click to read more »of this. Plus, this article is basically a longer version of the linked dict term. --Numyht (talk) 21:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC) Delete - just a football...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:OR, WP:DICT.. anything else? -Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 15:36, 14 November...
Click to read more »yada) 07:16, 24 April 2008 (UTC) Delete Either? Both? Does it matter, per WP:DICT? Someone needs edjamacation. Potatoswatter (talk) 07:30, 24 April 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »encyclopedic/its useful" arguments. There are valid concerns that it fails DICT (from my perspective, I believe they have provided adequate evidence of this)...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:NOT#DICT: Wikipedia is not a dictionary Jvhertum 11:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC) Speedy...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Delete: Ummm... This is pretty much WP:DICT. Don't think this is comparable to the exonym lists, though. Aintabli (talk)...
Click to read more »Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT. - SanAnMan (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Delete as it has no content other...
Click to read more »Meters (talk) 04:14, 5 May 2018 (UTC) Delete - Totally ambiguous title, dict def. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC) Delete as a rather ridiculous...
Click to read more »does not accept such lists, which would prove that it does not fail WP:NOT#DICT. Also, this should be kept per the WP:CONSENSUS of hundreds of editors who...
Click to read more »provided. Ktrimi991 (talk) 21:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC) Delete an unsourced dict-def. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:43, 14 August 2019 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Dictionary entries, which belong in Wiktionary, per WP:NOT#DICT.--Michig (talk) 14:20, 11 April 2009 (UTC) Merge & redirect both to Aggressive...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete or transwiki. Does not go beyond a dictionary entry; per WP:DICT we are not a "slang or usage guide". Sandstein 05:22, 13 May 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »--Candy-Panda 09:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC) Delete Inappropriate - WP:NOT#DICT. Not even appropriate for a dictionary though. CiaranG 13:25, 28 January...
Click to read more »reliable sources exist. Srose (talk) 15:47, 12 October 2006 (UTC) Delete dict. def. —Khoikhoi 18:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC) This AfD nomination was incomplete...
Click to read more »more than a dictionary definition and etymology, then delete per WP:NOT#DICT TheBilly (talk) 10:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC) Keep, a quick google confirms...
Click to read more »29 July 2021 (UTC) D (dict) Draft:Decentralized Internet of Things (0 days) D (nn) Draft:Icy (Kim Petras song) (0 days) D (dict) Draft:Social Internet...
Click to read more »records: 2009-11-22 10:57:06 (UTC): User ZemmerK (talk - contribs; 6) to GoldenDict (diff - undo) - Link: goldendict.berlios.de/. * Links added in this diff:...
Click to read more »dictionaries, not Wikipedia. Ptcamn (talk) 18:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:DICT, this would be better for Wikitionary.--Finalnight (talk) 18:20, 24 June...
Click to read more »the entry. Reillyd 06:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEO, WP:NOT#DICT and WP:OR Markeer 02:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC) Delete Article would need...
Click to read more »worthless junk. Bigdaddy1981 22:46, 9 August 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#DICT. Sxeptomaniac 22:59, 9 August 2007 (UTC) Delete as WP is not a dictionnary...
Click to read more »the most appropriate solution. Uncle G 10:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Delete dict def. -- Koffieyahoo 04:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC) NYU Press Electronic Title:...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:38, 7 February 2015 (UTC) Redirect to Apartment as per WP:NOT#DICT--Antigng (talk) 06:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »128 (t - c; 3) to w:el:Γομολάστιχα (diff !top) - Link: wikipriaka.com/en/dict/4 (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2018-06-11 15:56:39 (UTC): User 147.188.254.153 t •...
Click to read more »Uncle G 17:47, 17 October 2005 (UTC) Delete as per nom. Also, this is only a dict def even if yiou accept the coined word. Perhaps the page should be protected...
Click to read more »delete, possibly with a Transwiki to Wikitionary as a combination of WP:NOT#DICT, original thought WP:NOR and no history with a WP:NPOV to revert to. The...
Click to read more »WP:OVERLAP. FaviFake (talk) 10:37, 7 August 2026 (UTC) Merge per favifake and WP:DICT, it is on the wikitoinary tho WolfCapitan (talk) 21:19, 8 August 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Mandsford (talk) 15:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC) Delete Wikipedia is not a WP:DICT for obscure and unnotable reference for gays. Artene50 (talk) 21:47, 20 July...
Click to read more »-- wiktionary is a better place for it. An article expansion beyond the dict def would largely mirror Homosexuality#Europe, i.e. WP:CONTENTFORK. In its...
Click to read more »approximately 6,000 Wikipedia articles under Category:Surnames. Referring to WP:DICT: An article with a family name or a given name as its title is usually a...
Click to read more »245 (talk) 11:14, 10 April 2008 (UTC) Weak keep Runs risk of an attempted dict definition of a media hype coinage with an extremely loose application, but...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable dict def, previously discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/💮 so this is...
Click to read more »does not accept such lists, which would prove that it does not fail WP:NOT#DICT. Also, this should be kept per the WP:CONSENSUS of hundreds of editors who...
Click to read more »Amazing (talk) 08:56, 18 December 2007 (UTC) Snowball Delete Clear case of WP:DICT, no WP:RS. Just because you can build a word with greek/latin roots doesn't...
Click to read more »to Corporate law and leave a redirect. I don't see this being more then a dict def or in someways a 'how to'. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:40, 13 January 2008...
Click to read more »term. Wikipedia is not a dictionary and this violates WP:NOTDICDEF and WP:DICT. It is a perpetual stub with "that cannot possibly be expanded beyond perpetual...
Click to read more »30 July 2006 (UTC) Merge with Soft systems, as it is not much more than a dict def and only makes sense in that context. -- Koffieyahoo 01:29, 31 July 2006...
Click to read more »for clarification. If W~padeia and w~tionary were remote linked, so that dict-defs automatically came up, I'd support delete, but I would argue that this...
Click to read more »WP:NEO. Jd027chat 22:56, 9 February 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. and WP:NOT#DICT. JohnCD (talk) 22:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC) delete -- unless we develop a...
Click to read more »(complaints)•(contribs) 15:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC) Delete. WP:NEO per nominator plus WP:NOT#DICT. Ros0709 (talk) 15:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC) Strongest possible keep. Term itself...
Click to read more »(talk - contribs) to ru:ÐенÑи ÐоÑÑон (diff). Links: gutenberg.net.au/dictbiog/0-dict-biogL.html#lawson2 briefly.ru/louson/ www.ipiran.ru/....
Click to read more »discussions. – Uanfala 12:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC) Delete. As per WP:NOT#DICT (Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The Wikipedia articles endogenic and exogenic...
Click to read more »Language-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:04, 8 August 2012 (UTC) Fails WP:DICT and WP:NEO, and looks like something that should be in Urban Dictionary rather...
Click to read more »please dump the content onto wiktionary and replace the wikipedia page with {{dict}} -- Zondor 07:49, 18 February 2006 (UTC) This word is not unique to nor...
Click to read more »Delete This falls on the wrong side of WP:OR, WP:V, WP:NOT#IINFO and WP:NOT#DICT and is just listcruft. -- IslaySolomon | talk 06:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »perhaps and its use for political control? I think this has some worth beyond dict.def. gren グレン 20:43, 19 September 2005 (UTC) Anything there you can add to...
Click to read more »16:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC) Keep now has two bluelinks, doesn't read like a dict def. Boleyn2 (talk) 18:42, 16 January 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »an encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcuts WP:DICTSWP:DICTS WP:DICTIONARIESWP:DICTIONARIES...
Click to read more »by DA1 with the reason: "The article falls under WP:DEL14, that is WP:NOT#DICT #3. Aside form citation 1 which delves into the term, and citation 3 which...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:56, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Delete as a neologism and per WP:NOT#DICT. Gosox5555 (talk) 12:35, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Delete. It is nothing but a...
Click to read more »people interested in lean production, none of which helps this to pass WP:DICT. Google turns up nothing on this term, making me also question notability...
Click to read more »and a neologism. Realkyhick 06:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOT#DICT for WP:NEO--I already forgot 08:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - Completely...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:DICT. This appears to be an expanded definition of a phrase. Probably better transwikied...
Click to read more »debate was merge with Computer jargon Sjakkalle 11:22, 28 May 2005 (UTC) DictDef, computer jargon/slang. Can this be expanded? Otherwise transwiki to wikidictionary...
Click to read more »larger article. This appears to simply be a dictionary definition. See WP:DICT] I presume there is a larger article about the general overall concepts,...
Click to read more »veille. I assume cils is ceux and ueil is oeil, and cuer is listed in my dict. under coeur, but what is dou ? — kwami (talk) 07:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) From the prods: Neologism, WP:DICT: "Wikipedia is not a dictionary or a slang, jargon or usage guide." Terrillja...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Glorified dict def. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:52, 21 September 2025 (UTC) Update: deputy (disambiguation)...
Click to read more »