This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
established subject-matter experts is also acceptable. Shortcut WP:DEPRECWP:DEPREC Deprecated: There is community consensus from a request for comment to...
Click to read more »considered notable, also Crunchbase isn't a reliable source (refer to WP:DEPREC) QuantumRealm (meow • pawtrack) 08:31, 12 May 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »page WP:DEPS: Wikipedia:Deprecated sources, another information page WP:DEPREC: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Deprecated, and the definitions...
Click to read more »from an unreliable source that is not listed here. Shortcut WP:DEPRECWP:DEPREC Deprecated: There is community consensus from a request for comment to...
Click to read more »treatments. Still, I fail to see why reporting on five-year survival rate in a controlled study should be deprec(i)ated. ‑‑Lambiam 09:38, 22 July 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and rare exceptions that prove the rule. The only exception stated in WP:DEPREC is "for uncontroversial self-descriptions". I doubt the underlying incident...
Click to read more »Libraa2019, Please do not cite BOL News in future discussions as it is a WP:DEPREC. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC) @Saqib it is not deprecated...
Click to read more »[413]. Their most recent contributions list [414] shows them removing four deprecs from four different articles in one minute [415], [416], [417], [418],...
Click to read more »consensus very well with respect to WP:GREL vs WP:MREL vs WP:GUNREL vs WP:DEPREC. — Mhawk10 (talk) 20:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC) WP:BMI has many of the same...
Click to read more »considered notable, also Crunchbase isn't a reliable source (refer to WP:DEPREC) QuantumRealm (meow • pawtrack) 08:31, 12 May 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Görlitz (talk) 06:15, 18 January 2021 (UTC) Note to Walter Görlitz: per WP:DEPREC/WP:DEPS, deprecation can only be done through RfCs. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:04...
Click to read more »them to The Grayzone and Bustani? This looks like something allowed by WP:DEPREC. BeŻet (talk) 13:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC) Have these claims been repeated...
Click to read more »There's a difference between "generally unreliable" and "deprecated". But WP:DEPREC says it requires an RfC. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »there is a specific consensus to do so. So it is better to keep it as WP:DEPREC to warn inexperienced editors and help in detecting abuse of this source...
Click to read more »site:infowars.com, and InfoWars is quite a bad source. Looking through the WP:DEPREC publications, it also indexes basically all of them: RT, The Grayzone, Veterans...
Click to read more »(UTC) Well, there are clear wording differences between WP:GUNREL and WP:DEPREC, beyond the availability of technical means for the latter. Andreas JN466...
Click to read more »16:21, 12 Jul 2004 Montrealais uploaded "El-nino.gif" ([[de:Bild:Ninjo_deprec.gif]] Chart of abnormal ocean surface temperatures observed in December...
Click to read more »(WP:MREL) Option 3: Generally unreliable (WP:GUNREL) Option 4: Deprecate (WP:DEPREC) Option 5: Disallow except for special use cases (e. g. WP:ABOUTSELF) Reason...
Click to read more »[[WP:GUNREL|Generally unreliable]] * Option 4: Generally unreliable, with [[WP:DEPREC|deprecation]] Then you post a notice on the WP:ICTF page and on the talk...
Click to read more »would either be WP:GUNREL (like all other self-published sources) or WP:DEPREC (because it is alt-tech). However, if t.me links are commonly used to violate...
Click to read more »14:53, 29 January 2026 (UTC) I would agree with deprecation. Even a WP:DEPREC can still be used for strictly WP:ABOUTSELF. - Amigao (talk) 15:29, 29 January...
Click to read more »RFC about it. Not that GUNREL means never use, and I doubt we'd need to DEPREC if it's only come up twice, but using it doesn't solve the stated issue...
Click to read more »be undue. And further demoting Fox News for politics probably means WP:DEPREC. Please also see WP:DEPS, but it would mean there is absolutely no editorial...
Click to read more »area. It sounds bureaucratic but the terms have different impacts, see WP:DEPREC and WP:GUNREL. I don't think this needs closing (I'm not sure there is anything...
Click to read more »Libraa2019, Please do not cite BOL News in future discussions as it is a WP:DEPREC. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC) @Saqib it is not deprecated...
Click to read more »(UTC) Deprecation is not the same as blacklisted, Aaron Liu. Compare WP:DEPREC and the section immediately below it. I'm also still at 3/2 at this point...
Click to read more »