WP:DEL3WP:DEL3 WP:DEL4WP:DEL4 WP:DEL5WP:DEL5 WP:DEL6WP:DEL6 WP:DEL7WP:DEL7 WP:DEL8WP:DEL8 WP:DEL9WP:DEL9 WP:DEL10WP:DEL10 WP:DEL11WP:DEL11 WP:DEL12WP:DEL12 WP:DEL13WP:DEL13...

see that you have discovered DEL8.  WP:ATD is just as much as a part of deletion policy as is DEL8, so you can't cite DEL8 and ignore ATD.  Sorry, but...

Talk:Gammer (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) WP:DEL7 WP:DEL8 Apriestofgix (talk) 00:47, 9 March 2016 (UTC) @Apriestofgix: do you mean...

gets deleted. SwisterTwister talk 08:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC) Is this a WP:DEL8 notability argument, or a WP:DEL14 WP:NOT argument?  Unscintillating (talk)...

significant coverage" is a notability argument, not a deletion argument (WP:DEL8).  Michig is capable of agreeing or disagreeing with what I said.  His workmanship...

notability. Acidskater (talk) 04:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8, fails WP:BASIC/WP:GNG, and does not yet meet any additional criteria for...

even if they 'did it wrong' (try to fix it rather than delete it)."  WP:DEL8 does not apply when the topic can be redirected.  WP:IAR is used to improve...

doesn't cut it. Geschichte (talk) 21:29, 1 February 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8, good sources have not been found, and subject fails WP:GNG. — Sam Sailor...

of a larger topic known to be notable, and thus ATD always prevails over DEL8.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:46, 1 January 2018 (UTC) Delete - Could not find...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:30, 17 December 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8. Eric-Wester (talk) 06:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC) Delete not notable in any...

notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8: no reliable sources confirm that principal photography have commenced, thus...

WP:N !votes rise to the level of a WP:DEL8 argument does not overturn WP:Deletion policy.  A policy-based WP:DEL8 delete !vote both provides verifiable...

also fails GNG. --Saqib (talk) 17:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8, fails NDIRECTOR as well as WP:BASIC/GNG and is not notable under WP:ANYBIO...

"Diomedes Raul Bermudez" I find nothing useful. Fails WP:GNG, del per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 18:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DEL8: Not notable, does not meet WP:NJOURNALS or WP:GNG. This publication should...

find 1 citation in Asia Times and that's it. Fails WP:NWEB, delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 19:56, 18 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

article that would have been PROD'd with no controversy. (WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8). menaechmi (talk) 15:32, 2 August 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

WP:GNG. -- Tavix (talk) 21:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Delete for now per WP:DEL8, non-notable name per [[WP:APONOTE]]. Translation of Aari Surakka [fi] and...

three from Helsingborgs Dagblad are not enough for a GNG-pass. Delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 10:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

deletion/Talk:Gammer: the original nomination by Apriestofgix was "WP:DEL7 WP:DEL8." Ricky81682 (talk) 02:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

written by the band's founder and guitarist. Fails WP:BAND, delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 12:41, 30 March 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

to find specifics about it, and nowhere near WP:NMEDIA/GNG. Delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 19:19, 16 May 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...

reviewed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. — Sam Sailor 06:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC) Delete...

work is notable. Author currently has no individual article. Delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 04:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

caste-affiliated histories etc Sitush (talk) 10:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8; a search for "Rajput Basar" returns no sources at all. Could it be a hoax...

2017 (UTC) Yes, but WP:DEL8 does not exist independently of WP:ATD, which is just as much a part of WP:Deletion policy as is WP:DEL8.  WP:PRESERVE is also...

reference in the article, a primary source.  Fails WP:DEL7.  Also fails WP:DEL8 via WP:SUSTAINED, WP:Notability (events), and WP:DEL14.  Unscintillating...

to be none talking about his twin sons with Hilary Glazer. Delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 17:54, 28 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

WP:DEL4, there is no reliable sources of information for such a content WP:DEL8 and it's not notable enough WP:DEL14.Cenarium (talk) 00:48, 15 January 2008...

coverage about him, hence GNG/BASIC is not met and for now it is delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 11:04, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

bold text hurts my eyes. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 22:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC) Del8. --M@rēino 23:03, 14 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Ohconfucius 04:01...

Fails WP:NFILM. SW3 5DL (talk) 04:31, 19 January 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8 and redirect to director Abbas Fahdel as a plausible WP:ATD-R, but the film...

but not the in-depth coverage required by the WP:BLP policy(WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8). menaechmi (talk) 00:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

equivalent WP:BASIC, nor does he qualify under the SSG WP:MUSICBIO. Delete per WP:DEL8. An article on subject was deleted under PROD in 2015. Sam Sailor 01:19,...

notable. South Nashua (talk) 21:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8, non-notable hotel, sources not available to establish notability per WP:GEOFEAT...

additional relevant sources found, fails [[WP:NWEB]] and GNG, delete per [[WP:DEL8]]. Sam Sailor 10:16, 15 May 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

few secondary sources found are local. Subject fails GNG, delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 09:26, 8 January 2018 (UTC) (Amended. Sam Sailor 11:30, 9 January...

have not been found. No suitable target for a redirect found. Delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 15:43, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Delete - Subject does not meet general...

deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8, utterly fails the notability guideline for films. Sam Sailor 20:31, 20 April...

this is meeting WP:GNG for a stand-alone article. Delete for now per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 17:13, 26 January 2017 (UTC) Delete - No sign of notability...

makes him pass the general notability guideline for people. Delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 12:09, 14 January 2018 (UTC) Delete - He has not played in a...

sources with significant coverage. Fails [[WP:BASIC]]/[[WP:GNG]] delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 15:40, 28 February 2018 (UTC) Delete. Refs are youtube, blogs...

here. sixtynine • speak up • 18:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8, fails WP:NBOOK, and we do not have an article on Ashley Richards that we...

"U/chadpc" returns nothing reliable, and subject fails WP:BASIC; delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 17:07, 16 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

Wikipedia wants to cover all entrants to the Miss America pageant, so WP:DEL8 is not an argument for deletion.  The means that the remedy for non-notability...

poor promotional-esque prose (DEL4), the subject's debatable notability (DEL8), and, to a lesser extent, the sockpuppetry, I believe deletion would be...

article lists no well-known Washington media reporting the event.  Fails WP:DEL8 (WP:N) and WP:DEL14 (WP:NOTPROMOTION).  Unscintillating (talk) 13:05, 18...

when I search for them. Fails [[WP:NFILM]] and [[WP:GNG]], delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 09:03, 22 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

being used in some source code. Hardly significant coverage. Both DEL7 and DEL8, as the nom said. Enterprisey (talk!) 18:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC) Delete....

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:DEL8, fails WP:ANYBIO. See also discussion at BLP Notice board --Jahaza (talk)...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DEL5,WP:DEL6,WP:DEL7,WP:DEL8,WP:NPOV,WP:V,WP:N The sources listed only discuss a controversial proposed...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:DEL6, WP:DEL7, and WP:DEL8 as essentially all sources citing the propecies are non-scholarly pro-Ahmadiyya...

fails [[WP:NACTOR]] as well as [[WP:BASIC]]/[[WP:GNG]], delete per [[WP:DEL8]]. Sam Sailor 18:14, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

sources about that we could build a BLP upon. Fails BASIC/GNG, delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 19:44, 8 June 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...

Smartyllama (talk) 13:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. Legally recognised populated places are notable. This one however is a populated...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 for lack of notability under the relevant guidelines (GNG or ORG). I couldn't...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC) Delete (per DEL8) for lack of notability under GNG or ORG. The article has been improved since...

14 January 2017 (UTC) Notability is not an argument for deletion.  For WP:DEL8, you also have to explain why the article can be neither merged nor redirected;...

forum  Given that the topic is covered elsewhere in the encyclopedia, WP:DEL8 is not a deletion argument.  AfD has a backlog without taking on content...

article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:36, 10 December 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8. Not a hoax, an image search on SWED university and this directory listing...

WP:ATD is a policy, and since this topic is also covered at Ricky Lee Cox, WP:DEL8 is not a deletion argument.  Relevant policy and guideline text is cited...

have articles on Swedish Wikipedia. Fails WP:GNG/WP:BASIC, delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 17:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

of available information makes it impossible to prove notability per WP:DEL8. chickenpox4dinner (talk · contribs · email) 17:45, 24 July 2026 (UTC) Note:...

fails WP:BASIC/WP:GNG, and he does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 18:27, 26 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

notability, you understand that failing WP:NFILM is not an argument for WP:DEL8 deletion were this page in mainspace.  So is there something different about...

should not have been brought to AfD, as there is no theoretical case for a WP:DEL8 deletion.  See previous AfDs for additional info.  Unscintillating (talk)...

non-notable, and sources are week. Fails WP:NCORP/WP:GNG, delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 18:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...

seems to be out of business now, and they never were notable. Delete per DEL8. Sam Sailor 15:03, 3 March 2018 (UTC) I've moved Pixeline to Draft:Pixeline...

currently fails to meet notability, the article should be deleted per WP:DEL8. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 06:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

available sources and coverage, I consider the subject to be notable (to me, WP:DEL8 does not apply): (a) here is a book published by Duke University (b) here...

members using exclusively primary sources. (WP:DEL1, WP:DEL6, WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8, WP:DEL14) Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 01:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC) Note:...

February 2017 (UTC) Wrong venue  As established by Northamerica1000, WP:DEL8 is not a valid del-reason for this topic.  Since a redirect out of AfD is...

which applies here for a city of 73,000.  For mayors ATD prevails over DEL8, since mayors always have a redirect/merge target.  But the nomination here...

deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:17, 30 April 2017 (UTC) Delete (per DEL8). Not only is there no coverage, but a simple Google search using the school's...

this as a stand-alone article fails WP:GNG and should be deleted under WP:DEL8. I'm not convinced the idea of including the graphics in President of the...

is discussing WP:Deletion policy, which includes both WP:ATD and WP:DEL8.  WP:DEL8 doesn't specifically mention WP:GNG.  It does specifically mention WP:BIO...

000 employees in more than 70 countries".  So there is no case for a WP:DEL8 deletion.  Notability for a subsidiary should be discussed on the talk page...

notability. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:04, 27 June 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8, no significant coverage found, fails GNG. Sam Sailor 08:16, 27 June 2018...

This is a sub-topic of Kent University, and I don't see an argument that DEL8 overcomes ATD, so should not be at AfD.  As per WP:Deletion policy#CONTENT...

are reasons to delete a draft. Drafts are not checked for notability (WP:DEL8 only applies to articles), and it is better to leave drafts about non-notable...

without a COI would be willing to rewrite this G11 candidate. Delete per WP:DEL8 at least. — Sam Sailor 14:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

her likely notable per WP:ANYBIO, and the article should be deleted per WP:DEL8. I am very willing to change my position, if someone fluent in Chinese can...

per these criteria: WP:DEL6 (neologism), WP:DEL7 (no reliable source), WP:DEL8 (not notable, no significant coverage). DferDaisy (talk) 03:28, 26 July 2017...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:DEL7 & WP:DEL8, and seems to have extensively mis-cited the sources provided in the references...

of spellings of the name, without finding suitable redirects.  Fails WP:DEL8, including the WP:ATD.  Unscintillating (talk) 22:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC)...

a policy based term.  Not only could this relate to either WP:DEL7 or WP:DEL8, it might be read as a moving the goalpost argument, or as misdirection to...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:DEL8 non-notable Turkish author with one book; fails all points at WP:AUTHOR....

consideration of, and accordance with, the following policies: WP:DEL4, WP:DEL8, WP:DEL14, WP:PROMO, WP:N, WP:IAR.) — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:22...

notability. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:42, 20 March 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8. I could not find secondary sources that discuss this bus route's significance...

this topic elsewhere in the encyclopedia as shown in WP:BEFORE B5, so WP:DEL8 is out of scope.  Notability is then a content argument as to where and how...

Montreal (talk) 01:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC) Delete for lack of notability (DEL8) as the available sourcing does not amount to the significant, independent...

venue  As missed by the nomination but established by Northamerica1000, WP:DEL8 is not a valid del-reason for this topic.  Decisions between redirect, merge...

11:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC) Even if you believe the topic is not notable, a WP:DEL8 notability delete argument requires that you also explain why the topic should...

(WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO), which is a reason for deletion (WP:DEL8). — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:32, 31 August 2016 (UTC) Here are the Billboard article...

substance - David Gerard (talk) 17:00, 19 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 and FAILN as the subject does not appear to be notable. The only qualifying...

work Adults Only: The Final Album. Subject fails WP:NORG, delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 20:49, 7 February 2018 (UTC) Weak delete No asserted claim of...

WP:BASIC/WP:GNG, nor presumed notable under WP:POLITICIAN. Delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 08:41, 7 June 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

consideration of, and accordance with, the following policies: WP:DEL4, WP:DEL8, WP:DEL14, WP:PROMO, WP:N, WP:IAR.) — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:04...

consensus at AfD2 that the topic is notable, and makes no attempt to argue to WP:DEL8.  The proper closure here was Speedy Keep NPASR on 1 September 2016.  A "Wrong...

AfD? Is it WP:DEL7 (attempts at sourcing failed), or are you asserting WP:DEL8 (lack of notability)? And is the problem to such an extent that it cannot...

John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC) Delete both per WP:DEL8, doesn't meet WP:NCOLLATH. — Sam Sailor 10:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC) Comment...

WP:ANYBIO and no sources found to support subject meets WP:BASIC. Delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 14:30, 17 January 2017 (UTC) Delete' not enough significant...

WP:ATD-R here. Sources to meet WP:NFP have not been found; delete per WP:DEL8. The article Aranye Maniac Killer Mystery (2014 Short Film) (AfD) features...

consideration of, and accordance with, the following policies: WP:DEL4, WP:DEL8, WP:DEL14, WP:PROMO, WP:GNG, WP:N, WP:IAR.) — Coffee // have a cup // beans...

the question of notability in this context is a content dispute, not a WP:DEL8 argument.  AfD is not cleanup.  Unscintillating (talk) 15:45, 30 December...

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:28, 13 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. Significant coverage is sorely missing here. In fact there is hardly anything...

has anything to do with the current state of the article. I think that WP:DEL8 - "Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline"...

is a minor character that only appears every so often. To me, WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8, and WP:PLOT seem to apply. That being said, it would be a handy redirect...

by Thatgreg (talk • contribs) 16:01, 26 January 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8. Judging from a source search subject also fails WP:BASIC/WP:GNG. — Sam Sailor...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DEL8 - this page cites no independent or secondary sources, and after searching...

not sufficient coverage to build a BLP and pass BASIC/GNG. Delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 10:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC) Non-speedy delete is fine too, but there...

discussions. Nördic Nightfury 10:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL6, WP:DEL8. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball 10:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Keep Boomer...

in the article, the company fails WP:NCORP and should be deleted per WP:DEL8; if someone can do a better sourcing job, I'm all ears. — Sam Sailor 18:54...

similar articles in the past. Article should be removed under WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. XanderK09 (talk) 21:42, 21 April 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...

notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 23:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC) Delete  Fails WP:DEL8.  Just a general comment, contractors don't seem to be of much interest to...

deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC) Delete (per DEL8 and FAILN) because the available coverage falls far short of the significant...

mini-bios that don't require notability.  When the solution is said to be WP:DEL8, the claiming of lack of notability ignores WP:ATD, so is not policy-based...

guideline, it is not even referenced from WP:Deletion policy, unlike WP:N, WP:DEL8. The person disagreeing with me in not appearing conversant with deletion...

both WP:GNG/WP:BASIC as well as any criterion in WP:MUSBIO. Delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 00:49, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Comment - copy-paste from my...

merely an indiscriminate list of entries with no effective sources. Fails WP:DEL8, WP:DEL14. For the average reader it is impossible to tell what is notable...

  Unscintillating (talk) 21:50, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Comment - as per WP:DEL8 - lack of notability is a valid reason for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 22:57...

Delete. I fail to find significant coverage about subject; delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 16:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC) OK. I give up on this, please proceed...

normally follow.  In that context, how do you explain giving priority to WP:DEL8 over the alternatives to deletion that WP:PRESERVE our content contributions...

trainwreck should be deleted before any redirect is created. Delete per WP:DEL8. Source assessment Sam Sailor 20:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

weight in the encyclopedia at Sodexo, there is no theoretical case for a WP:DEL8 deletion.  We also know from the large number of reliable sources found that...

topic in the encyclopedia, so that for mayors, it is safe to say that WP:DEL8 never overcomes WP:ATD.  And why include only non-local coverage?  Unscintillating...

2018 (UTC) Delete. Weakly sourced ARTSPAM, fails NCORP/GNG, delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 21:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

this particular case. Jim Carter 09:33, 1 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 for lack of notability under NSCHOOLS, the relevant guideline, as there is...

21:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC) Comment  The policy ATD prevails over the policy DEL8 when there is a merge target that allows a policy-required preservation of...

that he meets the notability guidelines for academics. Therefore, per WP:DEL8, it is time for this article to rest in peace, just like Professor Davis...

2018 (UTC) Comment: The legitimate reason for deletion is per policy, WP:DEL8, as subject fails to meet the notability guidelines mentioned in the nomination...

WP:SIGCOV, WP:V for the WP:BLP and WP:NLIST, WP:SIGCOV, WP:V, WP:DEL14 and WP:DEL8 for the list. The list covers a 30 year period, a lifes work and effectively...

this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  16:09, 24 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 for lack of notability. Setting aside the MEDRS issue, I see no nontrivial...

clickbait/discogs style sites. Fails WP:NLIST, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:V and WP:DEL8, WP:DEL14. It is essentially a click and paste article scope_creepTalk 12:46...

the alternatives to deletion that are not optional in an argument for a WP:DEL8 deletion.  There is an out, to keep this as a deletion discussion, which...

because the company is defunct. It should be deleted pursuant to policy, WP:DEL8, because it fails the notability guidelines. Care to present the significant...

deletionists.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:29, 29 April 2017 (UTC) Delete or merge (per DEL8 and FAILN) for lack of notability under NSCHOOLS. The "schools" RFC, with...

deletion, which is required to raise a notability argument to the level of WP:DEL8.  Among other alternatives, consider that: WP:Deletion policy#Alternatives...

refer you to Wikipedia's deletion policy, in particular, take a look at WP:DEL8, in case you missed it, which clearly says that if an article isn't notable...

variations of WP:ATA, where the "just pointing to a policy" varies between WP:DEL8 and WP:DEL14.  The nominator has characterized this as a "fun" AfD.  Do you...

fails GNG. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC) Delete (per DEL8) as the school doesn't appear to have received the significant, independent...

effective filtering to determine what is notable and what is not. Fails WP:DEL8, WP:DEL14. Wikipedia is not place for this type of content. scope_creepTalk...

October 2018 (UTC) Comment: Looks more like a WP:DEL7 case so far than a WP:DEL8 case. The article was created by an IP-editor back in 2005. I had a look...

in advance. Steve Quinn (talk) 03:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 as not meeting GNG: I could find little nontrivial independent coverage worth...

Articles for Deletion. The reason for for nomination for deletion is WP:DEL8. There is only one sentence in this article, stating that the subject is...

that does not live up to WP:CORPDEPTH. Thus, failing WP:NCORP, this is a WP:DEL8 case. — Sam Sailor 16:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC) Lean to delete. Certainly...

thing for another is misinformation. Fails WP:NLIST, WP:SIGCOV, WP:V, WP:DEL8 and WP:DEL14. scope_creepTalk 13:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC) Keep Notable singer...

attention does he have to have to consider it sustained?  Further, a WP:DEL8 argument does not ignore the WP:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion...

(UTC) Delete. Sources to meet WP:NFP have not been found; delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 17:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC) Keep This is not an amateur short...

government.  As part of a larger organization, and given the requirement that WP:DEL8 deletions are subject to the WP:ATD, there is never a theoretical case for...

career, but I can't find sources online that support she does. Delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 15:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Comment. American sources are likely...

delete this article according to WP:DEL-REASON, WP:DEL#REASON, WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8, and WP:DEL9: 1."Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources...

article fails to show that the topic passes WP:Notability I don't think WP:DEL8 would be grounds per what's documented at Chess#Psychology and Chess#Chess...

don't think he passes WP:GNG, and this article should be deleted per WP:DEL8. I don't want to speculate about the veracity of the scam allegations discussed...

Fame. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 for lack of notability. The subject seems to meet PORNBIO points 1 and 2(c)...

larger topic covered on Wikipedia, so the policy WP:ATD prevails over WP:DEL8.  To repeat, WP:V and WP:DUE are the applicable policies for inclusion. ...

(talk) 15:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC) Delete for obvious lack of notability (DEL8) under NSCHOOLS. Rebbing 14:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Note Copied from article...

"posthumous" in some circumstances. The reason for this discussion is WP:DEL8. Where are the reliable sources establishing notability? I'm afraid two blog...

/ WP:DEL14 Borderline notable  Keep or N Delete WP:DEL8 N Delete WP:DEL4 / WP:DEL14 Non-notable N Delete WP:DEL8 N Delete WP:DEL8 / WP:DEL4 / WP:DEL14...

original research. BrightRoundCircle (talk) 17:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC) WP:DEL8: "Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following: 8...

Bevin.  That by itself should persuade you that WP:ATD prevails over WP:DEL8 in the current context. And that is without considering the contributions...

see that you have discovered DEL8.  WP:ATD is just as much as a part of deletion policy as is DEL8, so you can't cite DEL8 and ignore ATD.  Sorry, but...

In the previous AfD, the nominator cited "notability", which would be WP:DEL8, although when sources were brought to the AfD the nominator asserted that...

article notable. Guy1890 (talk) 06:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 for lack of notability under any of the applicable guidelines. The available...

discussions. Everymorning (talk) 14:52, 31 August 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 and FAILN as very clearly falling short of NSCHOOLS, the established notability...

fact checking." Guy1890 (talk) 03:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 as lacking notability. Even accepting that the subject's awards satisfy PORNBIO...

an argument for redirect/merge (non-notable) without an argument for WP:DEL8.  Do you have an argument for deletion?  Unscintillating (talk) 02:11, 13...

not relevant, WP:N is not a deletion policy...the deletion policy is WP:DEL8, and is a higher requirement than WP:Notability.  WP:BEFORE A1 tells us,...

WP:N !votes rise to the level of a WP:DEL8 argument does not overturn WP:Deletion policy.  A policy-based WP:DEL8 delete !vote both provides verifiable...

WP:PROMO page. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 as clearly failing GNG, the relevant notability guideline. Feigned shock...

collection of whatever. Specifically, I think the article fails: WP:DEL5, DEL8, and DEL14 (and depending on how the rule is interpreted, DEL6, in so much...

circumvention. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8, Curb Safe Charmer's analysis is correct, subject does not yet meet the inclusion...

fact more than a few of them are specifically WP:OR - and state as much. WP:DEL8 It lacks notability WP:N, not just due to the WP:V issues above, but also...

interpretation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC) Delete (per DEL8) because the school hasn't received significant coverage from independent...

Each !vote to delete or AfD nomination shall specify a WP:DEL-REASON. WP:DEL8 (notability) opinions shall show visible work for WP:BEFORE D1 (minimal Google...

take part in the process seem to think DELREASON consists exclusively of WP:DEL8. I even once encountered a highly experienced editor (an admin!) who was...

at me is not likely to engender much reasoned comment), we'll go for WP:DEL8 about a pointless waste of time and effort in trying to crowbar in unencyclopaedic...

notability judgments. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC) WP:DEL8 is the notability WP:DEL-REASON entry.  WP:Notability is not a content guideline...

even if they 'did it wrong' (try to fix it rather than delete it)."  WP:DEL8 does not apply when the topic can be redirected.  WP:IAR is used to improve...

WP:ANYBIO and no sources found to support subject meets WP:BASIC. Delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 14:30, 17 January 2017 (UTC) Delete' not enough significant...

are ignoring the WP:ATD, you can't claim to have made a policy-based WP:DEL8 !vote.  As for the claim that WP:BEFORE D1 garnered "little else", what about...

which applies here for a city of 73,000.  For mayors ATD prevails over DEL8, since mayors always have a redirect/merge target.  But the nomination here...

WP:ATD-R here. Sources to meet WP:NFP have not been found; delete per WP:DEL8. The article Aranye Maniac Killer Mystery (2014 Short Film) (AfD) features...

Holanthony (talk) 19:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Delete for lack of notability (DEL8). The subject fails GNG as the available coverage, including that presented...

significant coverage" is a notability argument, not a deletion argument (WP:DEL8).  Michig is capable of agreeing or disagreeing with what I said.  His workmanship...

reference in the article, a primary source.  Fails WP:DEL7.  Also fails WP:DEL8 via WP:SUSTAINED, WP:Notability (events), and WP:DEL14.  Unscintillating...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC) Delete (per DEL8) for lack of notability under GNG or ORG. The article has been improved since...

difference between whether a topic should be standalone or merged.  It is WP:DEL8 where the difficult decisions for inclusion are made.  As for what you are...

"[[WP:N|non-notable]]" an argument for deletion at AfD?  Include mention of WP:DEL8, WP:ATA, and WP:ATD in the answer. A: WP:N (specifcally this part) can be...

mini-bios that don't require notability.  When the solution is said to be WP:DEL8, the claiming of lack of notability ignores WP:ATD, so is not policy-based...

weight in the encyclopedia at Sodexo, there is no theoretical case for a WP:DEL8 deletion.  We also know from the large number of reliable sources found that...

undue.  Unscintillating (talk) 16:10, 31 December 2016 (UTC) As for WP:DEL8, WP:DEL8 does not exist outside the context of WP:Deletion policy#Alternatives...

consensus at AfD2 that the topic is notable, and makes no attempt to argue to WP:DEL8.  The proper closure here was Speedy Keep NPASR on 1 September 2016.  A "Wrong...

WP:ATD is a policy, and since this topic is also covered at Ricky Lee Cox, WP:DEL8 is not a deletion argument.  Relevant policy and guideline text is cited...

Delete. I fail to find significant coverage about subject; delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 16:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC) OK. I give up on this, please proceed...

(WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO), which is a reason for deletion (WP:DEL8). — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:32, 31 August 2016 (UTC) Here are the Billboard article...

a policy based term.  Not only could this relate to either WP:DEL7 or WP:DEL8, it might be read as a moving the goalpost argument, or as misdirection to...

consideration of, and accordance with, the following policies: WP:DEL4, WP:DEL8, WP:DEL14, WP:PROMO, WP:N, WP:IAR.) — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:22...

deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC) Delete (per DEL8 and FAILN) because the available coverage falls far short of the significant...

deletionists.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:29, 29 April 2017 (UTC) Delete or merge (per DEL8 and FAILN) for lack of notability under NSCHOOLS. The "schools" RFC, with...

the question of notability in this context is a content dispute, not a WP:DEL8 argument.  AfD is not cleanup.  Unscintillating (talk) 15:45, 30 December...

fails WP:BASIC/WP:GNG, and he does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 18:27, 26 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

notable. South Nashua (talk) 21:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8, non-notable hotel, sources not available to establish notability per WP:GEOFEAT...

John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC) Delete both per WP:DEL8, doesn't meet WP:NCOLLATH. — Sam Sailor 10:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC) Comment...

of a larger topic known to be notable, and thus ATD always prevails over DEL8.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:46, 1 January 2018 (UTC) Delete - Could not find...

2017 (UTC) Yes, but WP:DEL8 does not exist independently of WP:ATD, which is just as much a part of WP:Deletion policy as is WP:DEL8.  WP:PRESERVE is also...

hasn't identified a violation of WP:Deletion policy if a violation of WP:DEL8 is assumed, hasn't identified a violation of WP:N if a violation of GNG is...

to be none talking about his twin sons with Hilary Glazer. Delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 17:54, 28 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

WP:PROMO page. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 as clearly failing GNG, the relevant notability guideline. Feigned shock...

three from Helsingborgs Dagblad are not enough for a GNG-pass. Delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 10:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

WP:DEL4, there is no reliable sources of information for such a content WP:DEL8 and it's not notable enough WP:DEL14.Cenarium (talk) 00:48, 15 January 2008...

that he meets the notability guidelines for academics. Therefore, per WP:DEL8, it is time for this article to rest in peace, just like Professor Davis...

14 January 2017 (UTC) Notability is not an argument for deletion.  For WP:DEL8, you also have to explain why the article can be neither merged nor redirected;...

find 1 citation in Asia Times and that's it. Fails WP:NWEB, delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 19:56, 18 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

by Thatgreg (talk • contribs) 16:01, 26 January 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8. Judging from a source search subject also fails WP:BASIC/WP:GNG. — Sam Sailor...

Wikipedia wants to cover all entrants to the Miss America pageant, so WP:DEL8 is not an argument for deletion.  The means that the remedy for non-notability...

gets deleted. SwisterTwister talk 08:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC) Is this a WP:DEL8 notability argument, or a WP:DEL14 WP:NOT argument?  Unscintillating (talk)...

attention does he have to have to consider it sustained?  Further, a WP:DEL8 argument does not ignore the WP:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion...

sources with significant coverage. Fails [[WP:BASIC]]/[[WP:GNG]] delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 15:40, 28 February 2018 (UTC) Delete. Refs are youtube, blogs...

members using exclusively primary sources. (WP:DEL1, WP:DEL6, WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8, WP:DEL14) Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 01:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC) Note:...

Fails WP:NFILM. SW3 5DL (talk) 04:31, 19 January 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8 and redirect to director Abbas Fahdel as a plausible WP:ATD-R, but the film...

Smartyllama (talk) 13:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. Legally recognised populated places are notable. This one however is a populated...

thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed". WP:DEL8: "Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline"...

deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8, utterly fails the notability guideline for films. Sam Sailor 20:31, 20 April...

trainwreck should be deleted before any redirect is created. Delete per WP:DEL8. Source assessment Sam Sailor 20:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

government.  As part of a larger organization, and given the requirement that WP:DEL8 deletions are subject to the WP:ATD, there is never a theoretical case for...

this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  16:09, 24 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 for lack of notability. Setting aside the MEDRS issue, I see no nontrivial...

topic in the encyclopedia, so that for mayors, it is safe to say that WP:DEL8 never overcomes WP:ATD.  And why include only non-local coverage?  Unscintillating...

coverage about him, hence GNG/BASIC is not met and for now it is delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 11:04, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

Montreal (talk) 01:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC) Delete for lack of notability (DEL8) as the available sourcing does not amount to the significant, independent...

this as a stand-alone article fails WP:GNG and should be deleted under WP:DEL8. I'm not convinced the idea of including the graphics in President of the...

article that would have been PROD'd with no controversy. (WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8). menaechmi (talk) 15:32, 2 August 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

In the previous AfD, the nominator cited "notability", which would be WP:DEL8, although when sources were brought to the AfD the nominator asserted that...

work is notable. Author currently has no individual article. Delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 04:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

sources about that we could build a BLP upon. Fails BASIC/GNG, delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 19:44, 8 June 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...

(talk) 15:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC) Delete for obvious lack of notability (DEL8) under NSCHOOLS. Rebbing 14:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Note Copied from article...

career, but I can't find sources online that support she does. Delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 15:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Comment. American sources are likely...

don't think he passes WP:GNG, and this article should be deleted per WP:DEL8. I don't want to speculate about the veracity of the scam allegations discussed...

WP:GNG. -- Tavix (talk) 21:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Delete for now per WP:DEL8, non-notable name per [[WP:APONOTE]]. Translation of Aari Surakka [fi] and...

to find specifics about it, and nowhere near WP:NMEDIA/GNG. Delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 19:19, 16 May 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...

October 2018 (UTC) Comment: Looks more like a WP:DEL7 case so far than a WP:DEL8 case. The article was created by an IP-editor back in 2005. I had a look...

discussions. Everymorning (talk) 14:52, 31 August 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 and FAILN as very clearly falling short of NSCHOOLS, the established notability...

is discussing WP:Deletion policy, which includes both WP:ATD and WP:DEL8.  WP:DEL8 doesn't specifically mention WP:GNG.  It does specifically mention WP:BIO...

difference between whether a topic should be standalone or merged.  It is WP:DEL8 where the difficult decisions for inclusion are made.  As for what you are...

notability is not grounds for deletion, please explain what policy overrides WP:DEL8. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC) Since you...

available sources and coverage, I consider the subject to be notable (to me, WP:DEL8 does not apply): (a) here is a book published by Duke University (b) here...

few secondary sources found are local. Subject fails GNG, delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 09:26, 8 January 2018 (UTC) (Amended. Sam Sailor 11:30, 9 January...

has anything to do with the current state of the article. I think that WP:DEL8 - "Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline"...

but not the in-depth coverage required by the WP:BLP policy(WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8). menaechmi (talk) 00:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

notability. Acidskater (talk) 04:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8, fails WP:BASIC/WP:GNG, and does not yet meet any additional criteria for...

forum  Given that the topic is covered elsewhere in the encyclopedia, WP:DEL8 is not a deletion argument.  AfD has a backlog without taking on content...

000 employees in more than 70 countries".  So there is no case for a WP:DEL8 deletion.  Notability for a subsidiary should be discussed on the talk page...

makes him pass the general notability guideline for people. Delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 12:09, 14 January 2018 (UTC) Delete - He has not played in a...

delete this article according to WP:DEL-REASON, WP:DEL#REASON, WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8, and WP:DEL9: 1."Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:DEL7 & WP:DEL8, and seems to have extensively mis-cited the sources provided in the references...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DEL8: Not notable, does not meet WP:NJOURNALS or WP:GNG. This publication should...

that does not live up to WP:CORPDEPTH. Thus, failing WP:NCORP, this is a WP:DEL8 case. — Sam Sailor 16:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC) Lean to delete. Certainly...

"posthumous" in some circumstances. The reason for this discussion is WP:DEL8. Where are the reliable sources establishing notability? I'm afraid two blog...

both WP:GNG/WP:BASIC as well as any criterion in WP:MUSBIO. Delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 00:49, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Comment - copy-paste from my...

have articles on Swedish Wikipedia. Fails WP:GNG/WP:BASIC, delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 17:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

when I search for them. Fails [[WP:NFILM]] and [[WP:GNG]], delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 09:03, 22 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

currently fails to meet notability, the article should be deleted per WP:DEL8. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 06:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

not be merged, but that it is a violation of WP:Deletion policy to use WP:DEL8 to delete topics with merge targets, and there is no argument made here for...

This is a sub-topic of Kent University, and I don't see an argument that DEL8 overcomes ATD, so should not be at AfD.  As per WP:Deletion policy#CONTENT...

deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:17, 30 April 2017 (UTC) Delete (per DEL8). Not only is there no coverage, but a simple Google search using the school's...

article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:36, 10 December 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8. Not a hoax, an image search on SWED university and this directory listing...

not relevant, WP:N is not a deletion policy...the deletion policy is WP:DEL8, and is a higher requirement than WP:Notability.  WP:BEFORE A1 tells us,...

article notable. Guy1890 (talk) 06:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 for lack of notability under any of the applicable guidelines. The available...

AfD? Is it WP:DEL7 (attempts at sourcing failed), or are you asserting WP:DEL8 (lack of notability)? And is the problem to such an extent that it cannot...

substance - David Gerard (talk) 17:00, 19 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 and FAILN as the subject does not appear to be notable. The only qualifying...

also fails GNG. --Saqib (talk) 17:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8, fails NDIRECTOR as well as WP:BASIC/GNG and is not notable under WP:ANYBIO...

February 2017 (UTC) Wrong venue  As established by Northamerica1000, WP:DEL8 is not a valid del-reason for this topic.  Since a redirect out of AfD is...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:30, 17 December 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8. Eric-Wester (talk) 06:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC) Delete not notable in any...

21:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC) Comment  The policy ATD prevails over the policy DEL8 when there is a merge target that allows a policy-required preservation of...

seems to be out of business now, and they never were notable. Delete per DEL8. Sam Sailor 15:03, 3 March 2018 (UTC) I've moved Pixeline to Draft:Pixeline...

in the article, the company fails WP:NCORP and should be deleted per WP:DEL8; if someone can do a better sourcing job, I'm all ears. — Sam Sailor 18:54...

notability is not grounds for deletion, please explain what policy overrides WP:DEL8. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC) Since you...

is a minor character that only appears every so often. To me, WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8, and WP:PLOT seem to apply. That being said, it would be a handy redirect...

fails [[WP:NACTOR]] as well as [[WP:BASIC]]/[[WP:GNG]], delete per [[WP:DEL8]]. Sam Sailor 18:14, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

  Unscintillating (talk) 21:50, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Comment - as per WP:DEL8 - lack of notability is a valid reason for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 22:57...

article fails to show that the topic passes WP:Notability I don't think WP:DEL8 would be grounds per what's documented at Chess#Psychology and Chess#Chess...

article lists no well-known Washington media reporting the event.  Fails WP:DEL8 (WP:N) and WP:DEL14 (WP:NOTPROMOTION).  Unscintillating (talk) 13:05, 18...

per these criteria: WP:DEL6 (neologism), WP:DEL7 (no reliable source), WP:DEL8 (not notable, no significant coverage). DferDaisy (talk) 03:28, 26 July 2017...

2018 (UTC) Comment: The legitimate reason for deletion is per policy, WP:DEL8, as subject fails to meet the notability guidelines mentioned in the nomination...

notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 23:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC) Delete  Fails WP:DEL8.  Just a general comment, contractors don't seem to be of much interest to...

the alternatives to deletion that are not optional in an argument for a WP:DEL8 deletion.  There is an out, to keep this as a deletion discussion, which...

notability. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:42, 20 March 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8. I could not find secondary sources that discuss this bus route's significance...

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:28, 13 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. Significant coverage is sorely missing here. In fact there is hardly anything...

thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed". WP:DEL8: "Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline"...

of spellings of the name, without finding suitable redirects.  Fails WP:DEL8, including the WP:ATD.  Unscintillating (talk) 22:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC)...

poor promotional-esque prose (DEL4), the subject's debatable notability (DEL8), and, to a lesser extent, the sockpuppetry, I believe deletion would be...

Articles for Deletion. The reason for for nomination for deletion is WP:DEL8. There is only one sentence in this article, stating that the subject is...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DEL5,WP:DEL6,WP:DEL7,WP:DEL8,WP:NPOV,WP:V,WP:N The sources listed only discuss a controversial proposed...

discussions. Nördic Nightfury 10:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL6, WP:DEL8. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball 10:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Keep Boomer...

because the company is defunct. It should be deleted pursuant to policy, WP:DEL8, because it fails the notability guidelines. Care to present the significant...

variations of WP:ATA, where the "just pointing to a policy" varies between WP:DEL8 and WP:DEL14.  The nominator has characterized this as a "fun" AfD.  Do you...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:DEL8, fails WP:ANYBIO. See also discussion at BLP Notice board --Jahaza (talk)...

fact checking." Guy1890 (talk) 03:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 as lacking notability. Even accepting that the subject's awards satisfy PORNBIO...

original research. BrightRoundCircle (talk) 17:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC) WP:DEL8: "Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following: 8...

at me is not likely to engender much reasoned comment), we'll go for WP:DEL8 about a pointless waste of time and effort in trying to crowbar in unencyclopaedic...

larger topic covered on Wikipedia, so the policy WP:ATD prevails over WP:DEL8.  To repeat, WP:V and WP:DUE are the applicable policies for inclusion. ...

written by the band's founder and guitarist. Fails WP:BAND, delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 12:41, 30 March 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

collection of whatever. Specifically, I think the article fails: WP:DEL5, DEL8, and DEL14 (and depending on how the rule is interpreted, DEL6, in so much...

Holanthony (talk) 19:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Delete for lack of notability (DEL8). The subject fails GNG as the available coverage, including that presented...

not sufficient coverage to build a BLP and pass BASIC/GNG. Delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 10:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC) Non-speedy delete is fine too, but there...

circumvention. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL8, Curb Safe Charmer's analysis is correct, subject does not yet meet the inclusion...

deletion, which is required to raise a notability argument to the level of WP:DEL8.  Among other alternatives, consider that: WP:Deletion policy#Alternatives...

equivalent WP:BASIC, nor does he qualify under the SSG WP:MUSICBIO. Delete per WP:DEL8. An article on subject was deleted under PROD in 2015. Sam Sailor 01:19,...

being used in some source code. Hardly significant coverage. Both DEL7 and DEL8, as the nom said. Enterprisey (talk!) 18:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC) Delete....

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL8 for lack of notability under the relevant guidelines (GNG or ORG). I couldn't...

interpretation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC) Delete (per DEL8) because the school hasn't received significant coverage from independent...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:DEL6, WP:DEL7, and WP:DEL8 as essentially all sources citing the propecies are non-scholarly pro-Ahmadiyya...

hasn't identified a violation of WP:Deletion policy if a violation of WP:DEL8 is assumed, hasn't identified a violation of WP:N if a violation of GNG is...

normally follow.  In that context, how do you explain giving priority to WP:DEL8 over the alternatives to deletion that WP:PRESERVE our content contributions...

an argument for redirect/merge (non-notable) without an argument for WP:DEL8.  Do you have an argument for deletion?  Unscintillating (talk) 02:11, 13...

2018 (UTC) Delete. Weakly sourced ARTSPAM, fails NCORP/GNG, delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 21:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

WP:BASIC/WP:GNG, nor presumed notable under WP:POLITICIAN. Delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 08:41, 7 June 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

11:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC) Even if you believe the topic is not notable, a WP:DEL8 notability delete argument requires that you also explain why the topic should...

refer you to Wikipedia's deletion policy, in particular, take a look at WP:DEL8, in case you missed it, which clearly says that if an article isn't notable...

deletion/Talk:Gammer: the original nomination by Apriestofgix was "WP:DEL7 WP:DEL8." Ricky81682 (talk) 02:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

Lambert (talk) 02:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC) Aoyagi was closed as WP:DEL7, not WP:DEL8, so in spite of many similarities, does not compare easily.  And whether...

why not?  My quick analysis without access to the article is that the WP:DEL8 argument raised after the nomination was resolved.  The WP:DEL14 raised in...

there were no content problems identified in the AfD, and this was a WP:DEL8, the edit history at least up to the AfD should be visible.  Unscintillating...

AfD, but the argument was refuted within two hours of being posted.  WP:DEL8 is not valid given the WP:ATD.  Where is the responsibility of relisters...

quick analysis of the !vote count shows that there was a split between WP:DEL8 and WP:DEL14, and a keep !vote.  I think this is a fairly easy review to...

bold text hurts my eyes. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 22:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC) Del8. --M@rēino 23:03, 14 August 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. Ohconfucius 04:01...

there were no content problems identified in the AfD, and this was a WP:DEL8, the edit history at least up to the AfD should be visible.  Unscintillating...

why not?  My quick analysis without access to the article is that the WP:DEL8 argument raised after the nomination was resolved.  The WP:DEL14 raised in...

Lambert (talk) 02:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC) Aoyagi was closed as WP:DEL7, not WP:DEL8, so in spite of many similarities, does not compare easily.  And whether...

AfD, but the argument was refuted within two hours of being posted.  WP:DEL8 is not valid given the WP:ATD.  Where is the responsibility of relisters...

an argument for redirect/merge (non-notable) without an argument for WP:DEL8.  Do you have an argument for deletion?  Unscintillating (talk) 02:11, 13...

clickbait/discogs style sites. Fails WP:NLIST, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:V and WP:DEL8, WP:DEL14. It is essentially a click and paste article scope_creepTalk 12:46...

WP:SIGCOV, WP:V for the WP:BLP and WP:NLIST, WP:SIGCOV, WP:V, WP:DEL14 and WP:DEL8 for the list. The list covers a 30 year period, a lifes work and effectively...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DEL8 - this page cites no independent or secondary sources, and after searching...

effective filtering to determine what is notable and what is not. Fails WP:DEL8, WP:DEL14. Wikipedia is not place for this type of content. scope_creepTalk...

similar articles in the past. Article should be removed under WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. XanderK09 (talk) 21:42, 21 April 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...

of available information makes it impossible to prove notability per WP:DEL8. chickenpox4dinner (talk · contribs · email) 17:45, 24 July 2026 (UTC) Note:...