WP:DEL2WP:DEL2 WP:DEL3WP:DEL3 WP:DEL4WP:DEL4 WP:DEL5WP:DEL5 WP:DEL6WP:DEL6 WP:DEL7WP:DEL7 WP:DEL8WP:DEL8 WP:DEL9WP:DEL9 WP:DEL10WP:DEL10 WP:DEL11WP:DEL11 WP:DEL12WP:DEL12...

the majority of the content under WP:DEL7, even if it might meet one of the subject guidelines. Deletion under DEL7 also means that meeting the notability...

North America1000 02:52, 5 October 2016 (UTC) Delete  WP:DEL7, with WP:IAR added to bring WP:DEL7 to consistency with failure of the core content policy...

2016 (UTC) Talk:Gammer (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) WP:DEL7 WP:DEL8 Apriestofgix (talk) 00:47, 9 March 2016 (UTC) @Apriestofgix: do you...

a hard decision (talk to me!, contribs) 22:13, 20 May 2026 (UTC) Per WP:DEL7. This is a hard decision (talk to me!, contribs) 22:27, 20 May 2026 (UTC)...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:DEL7. Subject played on over 35,000 sessions and so the list will never be comprehensive...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 19:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

policy based reason for deletion.  The closest is WP:DEL7.  If there are people who think WP:DEL7 is not really what the community means, I've tried to...

for deletion/Talk:Gammer: the original nomination by Apriestofgix was "WP:DEL7 WP:DEL8." Ricky81682 (talk) 02:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate...

verification concerns. LibStar (talk) 13:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7, no reliable sources found. — Sam Sailor 06:42, 18 February 2017 (UTC) The...

Delete as an article that would have been PROD'd with no controversy. (WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8). menaechmi (talk) 15:32, 2 August 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...

relatedly, superficial merit to a WP:DEL7 argument (totally fails WP:V), with argument for "delete and redirect".  But DEL7 requires that you try to correct...

mentions, but not the in-depth coverage required by the WP:BLP policy(WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8). menaechmi (talk) 00:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...

2018 (UTC) Delete. I can not verify that this place exists, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 19:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

tracked somewhere other than the article's talk page, does it seem to meet WP:DEL7 ("sources not be found; despite thorough searches"). Happy to change recommendation...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 20:03, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

November 2017 (UTC) Delete  Unsourced, so there is nothing to preserve (WP:DEL7 IAR and WP:Deletion guidelines for administrators).  If an editor wants to...

JSTOR · TWL) Notability not established. Fails WP:GNG, per WP:DEL6, and WP:DEL7. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball 23:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Delete: An...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 20:59, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

script being used in some source code. Hardly significant coverage. Both DEL7 and DEL8, as the nom said. Enterprisey (talk!) 18:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC)...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 22:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

immediately return English results that can verify the place. Delete per WP:DEL7. No objection to keeping or recreating this, if a stub can be sourced to...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DEL5,WP:DEL6,WP:DEL7,WP:DEL8,WP:NPOV,WP:V,WP:N The sources listed only discuss a controversial...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 23:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

how small. Smartyllama (talk) 13:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. Legally recognised populated places are notable. This one however...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 22:59, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

if a stub can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. Currently it's a WP:DEL7 case. Sam Sailor 14:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 22:22, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

notice. Thanks, Nordic Nightfury 07:41, 25 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7. I am unable to find sources to verify the information in the article, although...

Head of state. Rathfelder (talk) 17:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC) Delete  WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR.  An article with no sources does not create a burden to AfD...

any kind.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC) As per WP:DEL7, that is not a policy-based argument.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:44, 11 February...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do...

this google search. This article can't have any references, so it fails WP:DEL7 Icebob99 (talk) 15:54, 15 December 2016 (UTC) - CSD This might be CSD G3...

promotions alone. Light2021 (talk) 16:59, 24 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7. There aren't enough reliable sources to verify the information and I am...

supported by RS. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7. I insist on scholarly sources for ethnicity related articles. This one doesn't...

huge energy field. Bearian (talk) 15:12, 17 November 2016 (UTC) Delete  WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR, as it is not AfD's role to do complete rewrites of articles...

otherwise there would have been more coverage. I'm going for a delete per WP:DEL7. I noticed that the article about the director was also recently deleted...

2018 (UTC) Delete. Hard to not agree with the above editors, del per WP:DEL7, fails WP:V. Sam Sailor 10:18, 24 October 2018 (UTC) Delete Not notable,...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 22:46, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 23:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

an article.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC) Delete WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR. An 85-year-old Boy Scout camp sounds like a topic of enduring...

citations to reliable references.  This makes it completely worthless.  WP:DEL7, with WP:IAR added because WP:V is a core content policy.  This article may...

WP:TOOSOON situation. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:41, 13 November 2016 (UTC) Delete  WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR.  Article has no sources, so requires a complete rewrite at best...

cruft lodges and festers. Jytdog (talk) 21:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC) Delete WP:DEL7. No WP:RSMED in over 10 years. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:50, 5 April 2017 (UTC)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:DEL6, WP:DEL7, and WP:DEL8 as essentially all sources citing the propecies are non-scholarly...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 20:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. - added by Sam Sailor. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:39, 21 September 2018 (UTC)...

not currently. Fenix down (talk) 12:04, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7, I can't find a single source that confirms this. Sam Sailor 18:22, 16 May...

sourcing. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7, completely unsourced and unverifiable. A merge would be inappropriate given...

deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 00:51, 2 March 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7; its existence cannot be verified by reliable sources. None of the sources...

coverage on this topic or any sources at all to verify its existence (WP:DEL7). BLAIXX 12:41, 18 March 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

about products that do not assert the product's notability or importance. WP:DEL7 Toddst1 (talk) 00:10, 17 April 2026 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:GNG - searches...

change my !vote, but till then it is a delete. (Just to clarify this is a WP:DEL7 delete as opposed to a WP:FAILN delete). Thus, nothing prevents this article...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails the WP:DEL7 requirement for valid sources. Looked to no avail. Jwribler (talk) 07:50...

Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 16:49, 12 September 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7, I can not verify that this place exists. Judging from Google Maps satellite...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 21:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

subject area do a better job? As it is now, it fails WP:V. Delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 09:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

mall's website and no inline citations, so fails WP:V#Notability and WP:DEL7 IAR.  I found a 1992 reference that showed a GLA of 252,000 sq ft, which...

--Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC) Also a delete per WP:DEL7 as the "awards" are sourced to primary sources and there are no reliable...

request that this page be deleted per these criteria: WP:DEL6 (neologism), WP:DEL7 (no reliable source), WP:DEL8 (not notable, no significant coverage). DferDaisy...

unsourced with made up data. This fulfills the criteria in WP:DEL6 and WP:DEL7. The page was created by a user who has been globally blocked, suggesting...

"hoax-like" sounding. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:20, 14 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL7. The sources are not good enough to verify information. I also quite curious...

22:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NMUSIC, as per WP:DEL6/WP:DEL7. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball 22:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Keep - Having...

2018 (UTC) Delete. I can not verify that this place exists, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 14:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE. I added a...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This page fails WP:DEL7; the only source I can find is the alread-cited Pears Encyclopedia entry...

sourceability" is not a policy based term.  Not only could this relate to either WP:DEL7 or WP:DEL8, it might be read as a moving the goalpost argument, or as misdirection...

current members using exclusively primary sources. (WP:DEL1, WP:DEL6, WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8, WP:DEL14) Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 01:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC)...

(UTC) Delete as nn. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 20:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 There's no reliable third party sources available to even verify the information...

at the AfD. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7. I insist on scholarly sources for ethnicity related articles. This one doesn't...

Bargaiyan; dubious. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7. I insist on scholarly sources for ethnicity related articles. This one doesn't...

talk:Deletion policy. ~Kvng (talk) 13:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL14 (in particular as a violation of WP:NOT#OR). I preformed a search...

Montreal (talk) 01:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC) Delete  Fails WP:V#Notability (WP:DEL7 IAR).  It is hard to find WP:GNG sources, in part because it is a conference...

a local consensus to disregard.  In terms of WP:DEL-REASONs, this is WP:DEL7 with an IAR for the source search, where the reasons for the IAR are both...

September 2016 (UTC) Delete with userfy/incubate on request  Delete as per WP:DEL7, plus WP:IAR for the requirement of "thorough attempts to find reliable sources...

appear by themselves, and WP:V is a core content policy.  WP:IAR, since WP:DEL7 cannot be used as stated to protect the encyclopedia from unsourced articles...

much to this. Esw01407 (talk) 15:38, 30 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 and WP:WHYN. Secondary sources are required and I am unable to find one....

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DEL7. Unable to find any sources to support content of page. "Sorby" and "shire"...

was unable to find sourcing in either language that meets RS standards. WP:DEL7 applies. I can't find English sourcing to meet our inclusion standards myself...

basically disregard WP:V, that is not acceptable. Delete per WP:DEL6/WP:DEL7. — Sam Sailor 04:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC) Merge to...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:DEL7 & WP:DEL8, and seems to have extensively mis-cited the sources provided in...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DEL7: Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify...

article should not be on Wikipedia.  For deletion policy, this would be WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR.  Unscintillating (talk) 16:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...

Violating core content policies is a reason for deletion.  For WP:V, see WP:DEL7.  As stated at WP:Deletion policy#Editing and discussion, "If an article...

Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:28, 13 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. Significant coverage is sorely missing here. In fact there is...

indicating notability). In the absence of such evidence being produced, then WP:DEL7 would apply and the breadcrumbs are at least listed for any future re-creation...

problem by referring to a living person without an inline citation.  Fails WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR added as WP:V is a core content policy, and WP:DEL14 for what...

WP:ORGDEPTH. I am not even able to verify any of the content and I recommend a WP:DEL7 deletion. -- Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC) Note: This...

a core content policy above any notability concerns. See WP:DEL6 and WP:DEL7. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:24, 1 August 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

redirect to someplace that discusses the topic, is needed.  Delete as per WP:DEL7, with WP:IAR added as WP:V is a core content policy, and our readers deserve...

North America1000 12:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL9 and WP:DEL7. This is one of the worst cases of BLP violations I have seen. None of the...

January 2017 (UTC) (So what is the specific reason for the AfD? Is it WP:DEL7 (attempts at sourcing failed), or are you asserting WP:DEL8 (lack of notability)...

independent source. Richard3120 (talk) 23:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 as unverifiable. I get 18 non-repeated hits on a search for Benzino "Sentimental...

and our readers can't verify the information as accepted fact."  Fails WP:DEL7.  There is related material at The Ural mountains in Nazi planning#Related...

Wikipedia's notability is determined outside of Wikipedia.  See also WP:DEL7, which even there an article with no sources requires evidence from a search...

discussions. North America1000 23:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC) Soft delete  WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR, as the article has no sources.  Unscintillating (talk) 15:52...

tell, this is a minor character that only appears every so often. To me, WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8, and WP:PLOT seem to apply. That being said, it would be a handy...

There is only one reference in the article, a primary source.  Fails WP:DEL7.  Also fails WP:DEL8 via WP:SUSTAINED, WP:Notability (events), and WP:DEL14...

numerous similar articles in the past. Article should be removed under WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. XanderK09 (talk) 21:42, 21 April 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion...

North America1000 09:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Keep Delete  I am citing WP:DEL7 here.  Yes, lots of Google books snippets, but what do they say?  I couldn't...

enough reliable sources to verify the information, so this is a delete per WP:DEL7 --Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

see that these "WP:V-issues" amount to a deletion rationale (policy: WP:DEL7) it is a WP:SURMOUNTABLE problem. Sam Sailor 09:41, 5 July 2018 (UTC) Addendum:...

a bad title, bad article, and a rather niche topic. We're well within WP:DEL7 territory, probably within the penumbrae of WP:DEL1 and WP:DEL2, and improvement...

this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  11:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7. There are no third party reliable secondary sources to verify the information...

third-party sources.  Sandstein  18:00, 8 March 2017 (UTC) That's neither a WP:DEL7 nor a WP:V#Notability argument without adding WP:IAR.  Unscintillating (talk)...

that could possibly be Deiros. All in all this stinks, and is at best a WP:DEL7 case. Sam Sailor 21:15, 5 August 2018 (UTC) Delete. I agree. Deb (talk) 14:39...

Your argument about being "unsourced content" has not added WP:IAR, and WP:DEL7 does not provide for deletion based on an absence of sources in the article...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:DEL7. I cannot find a source other than taking the figures from individual countries'...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article appears to fail the WP:DEL7 notability check. I was unable to find any reliable sources mentioning this...

(talk) 02:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC) Keep Delete  The article fails WP:V (WP:DEL7 with IAR for the source search, and see also WP:Deletion guidelines for administrators)...

WP:V we look to WP:DEL6 and WP:DEL7. DEL6 is obviously not applicable here, and I don't see evidence demonstrating DEL7 can apply. I also don't think the...

Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:34, 21 October 2018 (UTC) Comment: Looks more like a WP:DEL7 case so far than a WP:DEL8 case. The article was created by an IP-editor...

Coverage lost to the sands of time does not an encyclopedia write. Cf. WP:DEL7. Rebbing 04:30, 8 July 2016 (UTC) Weak keep. Cf this advertisement in the...

are the WP:BEFORE D1 source search results?  Verifiability?  What does WP:DEL7 say?  Unscintillating (talk) 12:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC) Far from being...

reasons to delete this article according to WP:DEL-REASON, WP:DEL#REASON, WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8, and WP:DEL9: 1."Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable...

below this notice. Thanks, —swpbT 13:51, 7 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 (although a weak one). I looked through a bunch of databases but was unable...

There is no adequate WP:DEL-REASON for "no sources...fails WP:V", because WP:DEL7 is stated using notability logic that sources that are not cited are considered...

identify a deletion policy WP:DEL-REASON, appears to be a WP:DEL7 nomination.  Regarding the WP:DEL7 nomination, I have identified and removed a social media...

that sources exist, and thus this is not unsourcable, so WP:DEL6 and WP:DEL7 don't apply. It's still unsourced, WP:PLOT and WP:OR. Keep for reasons stated...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 23:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

verify some of the information in the article. Right now it looks like a WP:DEL7 situation but I want to reserve judgement in the hopes that Cunard can pull...

that said, I think it would be valid with an AfD based on WP:DEL6 and/or WP:DEL7 considering that there is indeed a view among some editors that the article...

and The Chicago School no The Birmingham School page for some reason). WP:DEL7 In my opinion there are no reliable WP:V sources on this subject. There is...

because they are completely unverifiable is perfectly acceptable, see WP:DEL7. What you were proposing though is deletion of articles that are verifiable...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 20:03, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

is important to you.  You still have no argument for deletion, since WP:DEL7 does not exist in isolation of WP:ATD, and you are still WP:IGNORINGATD. ...

Wikipedia.  The idea also competes with our core content policies, including DEL7 within deletion policy.  Unscintillating (talk) 10:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC)...

Your argument about being "unsourced content" has not added WP:IAR, and WP:DEL7 does not provide for deletion based on an absence of sources in the article...

broader topic.  That is the work of our core content policies, including WP:DEL7 in deletion policy.  Unscintillating (talk) 10:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC) I've...

Violating core content policies is a reason for deletion.  For WP:V, see WP:DEL7.  As stated at WP:Deletion policy#Editing and discussion, "If an article...

the majority of the content under WP:DEL7, even if it might meet one of the subject guidelines. Deletion under DEL7 also means that meeting the notability...

relatedly, superficial merit to a WP:DEL7 argument (totally fails WP:V), with argument for "delete and redirect".  But DEL7 requires that you try to correct...

can be sourced to at least [[WP:GEOLAND]]. As it stands now, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 21:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:DEL7. Subject played on over 35,000 sessions and so the list will never be comprehensive...

November 2017 (UTC) That's patently deceptive. You've carefully avoided WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL14: Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources...

November 2017 (UTC) Delete  Unsourced, so there is nothing to preserve (WP:DEL7 IAR and WP:Deletion guidelines for administrators).  If an editor wants to...

sourceability" is not a policy based term.  Not only could this relate to either WP:DEL7 or WP:DEL8, it might be read as a moving the goalpost argument, or as misdirection...

(UTC) Delete as nn. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 20:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 There's no reliable third party sources available to even verify the information...

JSTOR · TWL) Notability not established. Fails WP:GNG, per WP:DEL6, and WP:DEL7. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball 23:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Delete: An...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:DEL7. I cannot find a source other than taking the figures from individual countries'...

third-party sources.  Sandstein  18:00, 8 March 2017 (UTC) That's neither a WP:DEL7 nor a WP:V#Notability argument without adding WP:IAR.  Unscintillating (talk)...

how small. Smartyllama (talk) 13:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. Legally recognised populated places are notable. This one however...

policy based reason for deletion.  The closest is WP:DEL7.  If there are people who think WP:DEL7 is not really what the community means, I've tried to...

talk:Deletion policy. ~Kvng (talk) 13:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL14 (in particular as a violation of WP:NOT#OR). I preformed a search...

2018 (UTC) Delete. I can not verify that this place exists, delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 14:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPLACE. I added a...

identify a deletion policy WP:DEL-REASON, appears to be a WP:DEL7 nomination.  Regarding the WP:DEL7 nomination, I have identified and removed a social media...

was unable to find sourcing in either language that meets RS standards. WP:DEL7 applies. I can't find English sourcing to meet our inclusion standards myself...

citations to reliable references.  This makes it completely worthless.  WP:DEL7, with WP:IAR added because WP:V is a core content policy.  This article may...

North America1000 02:52, 5 October 2016 (UTC) Delete  WP:DEL7, with WP:IAR added to bring WP:DEL7 to consistency with failure of the core content policy...

North America1000 12:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL9 and WP:DEL7. This is one of the worst cases of BLP violations I have seen. None of the...

current members using exclusively primary sources. (WP:DEL1, WP:DEL6, WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8, WP:DEL14) Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 01:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC)...

redirect to someplace that discusses the topic, is needed.  Delete as per WP:DEL7, with WP:IAR added as WP:V is a core content policy, and our readers deserve...

WP:ORGDEPTH. I am not even able to verify any of the content and I recommend a WP:DEL7 deletion. -- Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC) Note: This...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DEL7. Unable to find any sources to support content of page. "Sorby" and "shire"...

basically disregard WP:V, that is not acceptable. Delete per WP:DEL6/WP:DEL7. — Sam Sailor 04:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC) Merge to...

a core content policy above any notability concerns. See WP:DEL6 and WP:DEL7. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:24, 1 August 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

an article.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC) Delete WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR. An 85-year-old Boy Scout camp sounds like a topic of enduring...

Delete as an article that would have been PROD'd with no controversy. (WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8). menaechmi (talk) 15:32, 2 August 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DEL7: Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify...

Bargaiyan; dubious. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7. I insist on scholarly sources for ethnicity related articles. This one doesn't...

Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:34, 21 October 2018 (UTC) Comment: Looks more like a WP:DEL7 case so far than a WP:DEL8 case. The article was created by an IP-editor...

independent source. Richard3120 (talk) 23:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 as unverifiable. I get 18 non-repeated hits on a search for Benzino "Sentimental...

WP:TOOSOON situation. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:41, 13 November 2016 (UTC) Delete  WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR.  Article has no sources, so requires a complete rewrite at best...

North America1000 09:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Keep Delete  I am citing WP:DEL7 here.  Yes, lots of Google books snippets, but what do they say?  I couldn't...

mentions, but not the in-depth coverage required by the WP:BLP policy(WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8). menaechmi (talk) 00:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...

There is only one reference in the article, a primary source.  Fails WP:DEL7.  Also fails WP:DEL8 via WP:SUSTAINED, WP:Notability (events), and WP:DEL14...

subject area do a better job? As it is now, it fails WP:V. Delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 09:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

promotions alone. Light2021 (talk) 16:59, 24 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7. There aren't enough reliable sources to verify the information and I am...

reasons to delete this article according to WP:DEL-REASON, WP:DEL#REASON, WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8, and WP:DEL9: 1."Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable...

verify some of the information in the article. Right now it looks like a WP:DEL7 situation but I want to reserve judgement in the hopes that Cunard can pull...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:DEL7 & WP:DEL8, and seems to have extensively mis-cited the sources provided in...

notice. Thanks, Nordic Nightfury 07:41, 25 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7. I am unable to find sources to verify the information in the article, although...

that said, I think it would be valid with an AfD based on WP:DEL6 and/or WP:DEL7 considering that there is indeed a view among some editors that the article...

Coverage lost to the sands of time does not an encyclopedia write. Cf. WP:DEL7. Rebbing 04:30, 8 July 2016 (UTC) Weak keep. Cf this advertisement in the...

cruft lodges and festers. Jytdog (talk) 21:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC) Delete WP:DEL7. No WP:RSMED in over 10 years. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:50, 5 April 2017 (UTC)...

November 2017 (UTC) That's patently deceptive. You've carefully avoided WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL14: Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources...

any kind.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC) As per WP:DEL7, that is not a policy-based argument.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:44, 11 February...

September 2016 (UTC) Delete with userfy/incubate on request  Delete as per WP:DEL7, plus WP:IAR for the requirement of "thorough attempts to find reliable sources...

appear by themselves, and WP:V is a core content policy.  WP:IAR, since WP:DEL7 cannot be used as stated to protect the encyclopedia from unsourced articles...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails the WP:DEL7 requirement for valid sources. Looked to no avail. Jwribler (talk) 07:50...

tell, this is a minor character that only appears every so often. To me, WP:DEL7, WP:DEL8, and WP:PLOT seem to apply. That being said, it would be a handy...

mall's website and no inline citations, so fails WP:V#Notability and WP:DEL7 IAR.  I found a 1992 reference that showed a GLA of 252,000 sq ft, which...

request that this page be deleted per these criteria: WP:DEL6 (neologism), WP:DEL7 (no reliable source), WP:DEL8 (not notable, no significant coverage). DferDaisy...

article should not be on Wikipedia.  For deletion policy, this would be WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR.  Unscintillating (talk) 16:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article appears to fail the WP:DEL7 notability check. I was unable to find any reliable sources mentioning this...

deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 00:51, 2 March 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7; its existence cannot be verified by reliable sources. None of the sources...

Montreal (talk) 01:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC) Delete  Fails WP:V#Notability (WP:DEL7 IAR).  It is hard to find WP:GNG sources, in part because it is a conference...

2018 (UTC) Delete. Hard to not agree with the above editors, del per WP:DEL7, fails WP:V. Sam Sailor 10:18, 24 October 2018 (UTC) Delete Not notable,...

a local consensus to disregard.  In terms of WP:DEL-REASONs, this is WP:DEL7 with an IAR for the source search, where the reasons for the IAR are both...

that could possibly be Deiros. All in all this stinks, and is at best a WP:DEL7 case. Sam Sailor 21:15, 5 August 2018 (UTC) Delete. I agree. Deb (talk) 14:39...

and our readers can't verify the information as accepted fact."  Fails WP:DEL7.  There is related material at The Ural mountains in Nazi planning#Related...

below this notice. Thanks, —swpbT 13:51, 7 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 (although a weak one). I looked through a bunch of databases but was unable...

Head of state. Rathfelder (talk) 17:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC) Delete  WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR.  An article with no sources does not create a burden to AfD...

Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:28, 13 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. Significant coverage is sorely missing here. In fact there is...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:DEL5,WP:DEL6,WP:DEL7,WP:DEL8,WP:NPOV,WP:V,WP:N The sources listed only discuss a controversial...

huge energy field. Bearian (talk) 15:12, 17 November 2016 (UTC) Delete  WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR, as it is not AfD's role to do complete rewrites of articles...

discussions. North America1000 23:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC) Soft delete  WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR, as the article has no sources.  Unscintillating (talk) 15:52...

is important to you.  You still have no argument for deletion, since WP:DEL7 does not exist in isolation of WP:ATD, and you are still WP:IGNORINGATD. ...

tracked somewhere other than the article's talk page, does it seem to meet WP:DEL7 ("sources not be found; despite thorough searches"). Happy to change recommendation...

verification concerns. LibStar (talk) 13:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7, no reliable sources found. — Sam Sailor 06:42, 18 February 2017 (UTC) The...

this google search. This article can't have any references, so it fails WP:DEL7 Icebob99 (talk) 15:54, 15 December 2016 (UTC) - CSD This might be CSD G3...

"hoax-like" sounding. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:20, 14 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per DEL7. The sources are not good enough to verify information. I also quite curious...

indicating notability). In the absence of such evidence being produced, then WP:DEL7 would apply and the breadcrumbs are at least listed for any future re-creation...

see that these "WP:V-issues" amount to a deletion rationale (policy: WP:DEL7) it is a WP:SURMOUNTABLE problem. Sam Sailor 09:41, 5 July 2018 (UTC) Addendum:...

a bad title, bad article, and a rather niche topic. We're well within WP:DEL7 territory, probably within the penumbrae of WP:DEL1 and WP:DEL2, and improvement...

not currently. Fenix down (talk) 12:04, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:DEL7, I can't find a single source that confirms this. Sam Sailor 18:22, 16 May...

(talk) 02:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC) Keep Delete  The article fails WP:V (WP:DEL7 with IAR for the source search, and see also WP:Deletion guidelines for administrators)...

is itself WP:SYNTH. In addition to failing basic sourcing standards (WP:DEL7), the inadequate sources being used for this article are mostly the same...

--Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC) Also a delete per WP:DEL7 as the "awards" are sourced to primary sources and there are no reliable...

script being used in some source code. Hardly significant coverage. Both DEL7 and DEL8, as the nom said. Enterprisey (talk!) 18:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:DEL6, WP:DEL7, and WP:DEL8 as essentially all sources citing the propecies are non-scholarly...

that sources exist, and thus this is not unsourcable, so WP:DEL6 and WP:DEL7 don't apply. It's still unsourced, WP:PLOT and WP:OR. Keep for reasons stated...

problem by referring to a living person without an inline citation.  Fails WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR added as WP:V is a core content policy, and WP:DEL14 for what...

unsourced with made up data. This fulfills the criteria in WP:DEL6 and WP:DEL7. The page was created by a user who has been globally blocked, suggesting...

Wikipedia's notability is determined outside of Wikipedia.  See also WP:DEL7, which even there an article with no sources requires evidence from a search...

for deletion/Talk:Gammer: the original nomination by Apriestofgix was "WP:DEL7 WP:DEL8." Ricky81682 (talk) 02:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate...

coverage on this topic or any sources at all to verify its existence (WP:DEL7). BLAIXX 12:41, 18 March 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC) Aoyagi was closed as WP:DEL7, not WP:DEL8, so in spite of many similarities, does not compare easily. ...

comes to sports and only serves to let us know if the subject passes the DEL7 bar: that any high school quarterback in the US automatically passes the...

better option, because Chris' best argument was the verifiability claim (WP:DEL7), which was slightly addressed, but participants didn't come to a conclusion...

reveals 23 Wikipedias with articles on this topic.  The nomination, a WP:DEL7 (WP:V) argument, attempted to repeat a two-year old argument from the earlier...

February 2016 (UTC) WP:N is a guideline that does not require sources.  WP:DEL7 supports the policies of both WP:V and WP:DP, and could be combined with...

unsourced; there has to be a credible argument that it's unsourceable per WP:DEL7. No such effort was undertaken. Jclemens (talk) 08:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)...

for a Juno. That wasn't discussed at the AfD. Bearcat made a de facto WP:DEL7 argument, which arguably isn't true anymore because of the sourcing provided...

History and Wales. Kylesenior (talk) 03:13, 24 May 2026 (UTC) Support per WP:DEL7 Mitchsavl (talk) 05:15, 24 May 2026 (UTC) Neutral/Weak Oppose: Support: I...

referencing is extremely poor and doesn't satisfy WP:SIRS, WP:NCORP. It is a WP:DEL7, WP:DEL14 case. scope_creepTalk 09:46, 6 January 2026 (UTC) Comment: Thanks...

for a Juno. That wasn't discussed at the AfD. Bearcat made a de facto WP:DEL7 argument, which arguably isn't true anymore because of the sourcing provided...

better option, because Chris' best argument was the verifiability claim (WP:DEL7), which was slightly addressed, but participants didn't come to a conclusion...

John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC) Aoyagi was closed as WP:DEL7, not WP:DEL8, so in spite of many similarities, does not compare easily. ...

reveals 23 Wikipedias with articles on this topic.  The nomination, a WP:DEL7 (WP:V) argument, attempted to repeat a two-year old argument from the earlier...

February 2016 (UTC) WP:N is a guideline that does not require sources.  WP:DEL7 supports the policies of both WP:V and WP:DP, and could be combined with...

comes to sports and only serves to let us know if the subject passes the DEL7 bar: that any high school quarterback in the US automatically passes the...

unsourced; there has to be a credible argument that it's unsourceable per WP:DEL7. No such effort was undertaken. Jclemens (talk) 08:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)...

WP:V we look to WP:DEL6 and WP:DEL7. DEL6 is obviously not applicable here, and I don't see evidence demonstrating DEL7 can apply. I also don't think the...

about products that do not assert the product's notability or importance. WP:DEL7 Toddst1 (talk) 00:10, 17 April 2026 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:GNG - searches...

is itself WP:SYNTH. In addition to failing basic sourcing standards (WP:DEL7), the inadequate sources being used for this article are mostly the same...

numerous similar articles in the past. Article should be removed under WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. XanderK09 (talk) 21:42, 21 April 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion...

History and Wales. Kylesenior (talk) 03:13, 24 May 2026 (UTC) Support per WP:DEL7 Mitchsavl (talk) 05:15, 24 May 2026 (UTC) Neutral/Weak Oppose: Support: I...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This page fails WP:DEL7; the only source I can find is the alread-cited Pears Encyclopedia entry...

referencing is extremely poor and doesn't satisfy WP:SIRS, WP:NCORP. It is a WP:DEL7, WP:DEL14 case. scope_creepTalk 09:46, 6 January 2026 (UTC) Comment: Thanks...