This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
should be compatible with this guideline. Shortcuts MOS:DATERANGEMOS:DATERANGE MOS:DOBMOS:DOB MOS:YEARRANGEMOS:YEARRANGE Designate chronological ranges...
Click to read more »2019–2024 Full list of 702 affected categories Nominator's rationale: Per MOS:DATERANGE for non-consecutive years. There is 1 potential caveat there ("in certain...
Click to read more »h=%3A(%22corsair%22+OR+%22(corsair)%22)&countrysearch=&specialsearch=&daterange=&keywords=&range=&sort_order=datestamp+desc&page_limit=120&thumbnails=...
Click to read more »h=%3A(%22corsair%22+OR+%22(corsair)%22)&countrysearch=&specialsearch=&daterange=&keywords=&range=&sort_order=datestamp+desc&page_limit=120&thumbnails=...
Click to read more »h=%3A(%22corsair%22+OR+%22(corsair)%22)&countrysearch=&specialsearch=&daterange=&keywords=&range=&sort_order=datestamp+desc&page_limit=120&thumbnails=...
Click to read more »h=%3A(%22corsair%22+OR+%22(corsair)%22)&countrysearch=&specialsearch=&daterange=&keywords=&range=&sort_order=datestamp+desc&page_limit=120&thumbnails=...
Click to read more »Music! discography#Now Dance series (1985–2016) (link changed per MOS:DATERANGE) per above. QuietHere (talk) 06:56, 2 November 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »(and various other date range renderings): following a change at MOS:DATERANGE, this should now be "1541–1568" "File:Seyh-ül-Islâm.jpg": I suggest cropping...
Click to read more »to update it by the previous commentator per the 2016 changes to MOS:DATERANGE. Miyagawa (talk) 19:36, 25 March 2018 (UTC) I disagree completely with...
Click to read more »January 2016 (UTC) in the infobox: "1862–1863" should be "1862–63" per WP:DATERANGE; Done--KAVEBEAR (talk) 21:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC) the duplicate link...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:27, 30 January 2016 (UTC) "1914––1919" --> "1914–19" per WP:DATERANGE (same for other similar date ranges in the article) Addressed I believe...
Click to read more »the same century as the opening year (2008–12, but not 1999–01) (MOS:DATERANGE). Years cover a character's duration broadly, with gaps only when an absence...
Click to read more »ten-meter cattle-prod.'" How does this makes Stantz a fictional alumnus? WP:DATERANGE - only year ranges for birth/death are in the form 1900–1950, and terms...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC) "1921–22" --> "1921–1922" per WP:DATERANGE (in lead and postwar career section) Fixed "File:134 Kong Haakon VII forladende...
Click to read more »financial crisis - write this out a 2007–2008 (note the en-dash, –). See MOS:DATERANGE. Fixed: I used the article version of title complete with an en-dash using...
Click to read more »from 2001–2008" -> "from 2000–07 and nine List A games from 2001–08", WP:DATERANGE Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC) Ref 46 (Cricket...
Click to read more »format. You use "1910–1912", I believe it should be "1910–12" per WP:DATERANGE Some minor inconsistency with presentation of percentages, see "80 percent"...
Click to read more »to talk to me) 01:15, 23 March 2018 (UTC) Support Link Melbourne MOS:DATERANGE says to use nadashes and not slashes in date ranges Hawkeye7 (discuss)...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:41, 28 November 2015 (UTC) "1909–1949" --> "1909–49" per WP:DATERANGE; Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC) "File:Jacob L. Devers...
Click to read more »more employees were fired Were they fired or layed-off? 2012-2015 Per WP:DATERANGE, this ought to be 2012–15. In 2012, the development of Mad Max began It...
Click to read more »WP:ENGVAR, especially "organisations"/"organizations". Alternative WP:DATERANGE formats that editors might well try to use. Categories for objects which...
Click to read more »required) in the lead, built in 1915–16, per the newish guidance at WP:DATERANGE it should now be "1915–1916" slightly inconsistent: "330 tonnes (320 long...
Click to read more »fortunes” … who turned around the club’s fortunes … more direct ? See MOS:DATERANGE. There is inconsistent year styles in the section headings: Early years...
Click to read more »anybody have a quick fix-it local javascript to adjust date ranges per MOS:DATERANGE? I'm looking at List of programs previously broadcast by NBC and I see...
Click to read more »the right thing to do. Freikorp (talk) 23:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC) per WP:DATERANGE, the years of service in the infobox should probably be presented as:...
Click to read more »From 1877 to 1908...—I maybe be misinterpreting the MoS, but per MOS:DATERANGE, this should be 1877–1908, no? Hence, Washington's strategy for improving...
Click to read more »19th item on page 211). StuRat (talk) 17:19, 17 March 2016 (UTC) See MOS:DATERANGE. For example, just to be totally aggravating, a person's lifespan does...
Click to read more »aircraft_genericsearch=&airlinesearch=&countrysearch=&specialsearch=&daterange=&keywords=n2t&range=&sort_order=&page_limit=15&thumbnails=&calccount=...
Click to read more »23 January 2016 (UTC) in the infobox: "1941–1943" --> "1941–43" per WP:DATERANGE irregular caps: " Association against Bulgarian Bandits" --> " Association...
Click to read more »broadside is overlinked 1898–03 in the infobox should be 1898–1903 per WP:DATERANGE there are rounding differences between the body and infobox for beam the...
Click to read more »(UTC) "built in 1914–15, she..." --> probably should be 1914–1915 per WP:DATERANGE inconsistent: "330 tonnes (320 long tons) fully loaded" (body) v. "330...
Click to read more »transclusions · logs · subpages) This template's only use was to separate a daterange in table cells (and was only used in 1 article). This use was only for...
Click to read more »"Sometime in 1939–41 the ship" --> "Sometime in 1939–1941 the ship" per WP:DATERANGE Done in the References, suggest adding a page range for Hervieux's chapter...
Click to read more »Deletion Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2015 February 25 Got a script for MOS:DATERANGE? URL? Hon. Lalith Athulthmudali P.C ( Sri Lanka Minister) How to Add an...
Click to read more »"on the night of May 29/30" as suggested by MOS:DATERANGE Done. I wasn't aware of that part of DATERANGE was Van Dorn's army the Army of the West? Suggest...
Click to read more »exceptions for proper and common nouns, and I'm aware that WP:MILMOS#DATERANGE may have other requirements. I'm not entirely sure which system you've...
Click to read more »parens and conform to MOS:DATERANGE I feel the parentheses in this case isn't so undesirable and also allowed by MOS:DATERANGE. HaEr48 (talk) 23:46, 13...
Click to read more »vice-president then president of the ULP in 1907–08" should be "1907–1908" (MOS:DATERANGE) Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »rationale: Rename/redate date ranges from ccyy–yy to ccyy–ccyy per MOS:DATERANGE. I have put in a bot request to do this with more details see Wikipedia:Bot...
Click to read more »ten-meter cattle-prod.'" How does this makes Stantz a fictional alumnus? WP:DATERANGE - only year ranges for birth/death are in the form 1900–1950, and terms...
Click to read more »does the later "new" main building. Use dates. 2020/2021 ... see MOS:DATERANGE Prose - samples only Many names have been given to the school throughout...
Click to read more »November 2017 (UTC) Thanks for pointing out the inconsistency. However, MOS:DATERANGE prefers the full four digit years, so I've moved them accordingly. --...
Click to read more »suggestions: AustralianRupert (talk) 12:20, 10 October 2016 (UTC) per WP:DATERANGE: the guidance here has changed to full dates, e.g. "1923–29" --> "1923–1929"...
Click to read more »program, this field also allows for a span of years (ex. 1997–1998 (see MOS:DATERANGE)). Title The title of the work. Always use "Title" as opposed to "Film"...
Click to read more »December 2015 (UTC) Use |date=September–October 2013 which comports with WP:DATERANGE. If you wish to hide error messages so that you can't see them (other...
Click to read more »RfDs to "delete"? added May 25, 2016, archived July 9, 2016 Revise WP:DATERANGE styling? added June 18, 2016, archived July 21, 2016 Rename Wikipedia:Biographies...
Click to read more »throughout and switch all to either spaced endash or unspaced emdash. See MOS:DATERANGE: 1918-1919 Influenza Epidemic should be an endash, not a hyphen (I will...
Click to read more »to being Grade I listed Pontypridd" - Comma after listed "1791-95" MOS:DATERANGE wants 1791–1795 "Located on the west side of Hopkinstown the Hetty Engine...
Click to read more »"two-thirds" per MOS:FRAC "1924/25" should be "1924–1925" according to MOS:DATERANGE. Same for "1911/1912". Is there a citation for the information in the...
Click to read more »available: AWB Function overview: Updating MP listings to adhere to MOS:DATERANGE, e.g. Category:English MPs 1512–14 → Category:English MPs 1512–1514. Links...
Click to read more »see if it works for you. Suggest 1909–1910 and similar per the new WP:DATERANGE guidance of years in full Yeah, I hate that change. there's some assumed...
Click to read more »Roosevelt (1933–1945 · timeline)". The style of the date ranges is per MOS:DATERANGE. Ham II (talk) 19:38, 24 February 2017 (UTC) @Drdpw, JFG, GoodDay, Ethanbas...
Click to read more »AustralianRupert (talk) 11:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC) 1792–98 --> "1792-1798" per WP:DATERANGE units combined the old military units with new revolutionary formations...
Click to read more »double digit year ranges in the infobox are allowed but discouraged by MOS:DATERANGE. I don't think space is an issue here to full years would be preferred...
Click to read more »the main namespace but without any pseudonamespace prefix. WP:DATERANGE and MOS:DATERANGE both exist and take people to the relevant section of the target...
Click to read more »closing year in a year range be four digits rather than two, per MOS:DATERANGE: The second phase (2004–2006), rather than The second phase (2004–06)...
Click to read more »1904–1905," and "of 1894–1895, both..." per the (newish) guidance at WP:DATERANGE Bah, I hate anything that makes me have to type anything extra. Bad RFC...
Click to read more »undiscussed moves to be reverted. Mover's argument has been that MOS:DATERANGE prefers xxxx–xxxx. My reading of MOS: it states xxxx–xxxx is the general...
Click to read more »Comments Year ranges now need centuries at both ends of the range, per MOS:DATERANGE. Done.Krish | Talk 12:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC) Use en-dash for numerical...
Click to read more »1862" should have an unspaced endash and be presented as "1861–62" per WP:DATERANGE fixed TwoScars (talk) 15:07, 20 March 2016 (UTC) if you are looking for...
Click to read more »be endashes not emdashes I'm not sure when it changed, but I think WP:DATERANGE now asks for "1938–41" to be "1938–1941" etc " bailed out" --> I wonder...
Click to read more »instance you use both "1861–62" and "1861–1865" (relevant policy is MOS:DATERANGE which suggests the former is more correct). Some inconsistency in presentation...
Click to read more »War (1676–1681), which uses an endash rather than a hyphen per MOS:DATERANGE, per nom and WP:C2A. Does this work for you, @Bearcat and Marcocapelle...
Click to read more »made to this discussion. I recently initiated a discussion regarding WP:DATERANGE, the MoS guideline that specifies use of two-digit abbreviated years in...
Click to read more »17:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC) Timeline year ranges should comply with MOS:DATERANGE. Fixed Thrakkx (talk) 17:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC) Notes, be consistent...
Click to read more »I went ahead and rendered the men's and women's tables as well. MOS:DATERANGE notes that non‑abbreviated years are generally preferred, so I would expand...
Click to read more »K.Kapil77 Bot (talk) 10:20, 8 June 2021 (UTC) No. [12] changes a MOS:DATERANGE-compliant date to a non-compliant form. I don't have the know-how to tell...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Year ranges need to conform to the new requirement of MOS:DATERANGE Done The space between the commanders in the infobox can be removed by...
Click to read more »1939 ..." or "from 1937 to 1939". from 19xx–xx is incorrect per MOS:DATERANGE. —Vensatry (talk) 20:12, 5 December 2018 (UTC) Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi...
Click to read more »Ol’factory (talk) 23:14, 14 May 2012 (UTC) 'Comment' I think there should be a daterange attached to that, to make it clear what it is for, since some people still...
Click to read more »Teriitaria's younger sister"? Changed "1814–15" --> "1814–1815" per MOS:DATERANGE Changed Described as an Amazon queen: suggest stating who described her...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) The logo in the infobox seems to be missing alt text. Per MOS:DATERANGE I think the date in the infobox is considered "simple" since it takes...
Click to read more »IHTS' edit in the revert was because his edit seems to go against MOS:DATERANGE which says "A change from a preference for two digits, to a preference...
Click to read more »lost a total of nine of their..." "1966–1969" --> "1966–1969" per WP:DATERANGE; suggest linking "No. 229 Operational Conversion Unit RAF"; this probably...
Click to read more »Well, I think that you are both wrong and right. I was remembering MOS:DATERANGE, but misremembering that when it says "Two-digit ending years (1881–82...
Click to read more »statement in the main narrative or directly cited. Done Lead: Per MOS:DATERANGE, it should be "from 271 to 274 AD" Done "...raised to emperor..." ->...
Click to read more »the section "Nazi Germany (1933–45)". Note that you must adhere to MOS:DATERANGE If available, I would add a picture column. I believe a number of pictures...
Click to read more »storm here: http://query.nytimes.com/search/query?frow=0&n=10&srcht=s&daterange=period&query=storm&srchst=p&submit.x=26&submit.y=14&submit=sub&hdlque...
Click to read more »preferred. For reference, it is the seventh major bullet point in MOS:DATERANGE, which says: An overnight period may be expressed using a slash between...
Click to read more »of the endash contains a space, a spaced endash should be used per MOS:DATERANGE Fixed. Kges1901 (talk) 12:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC) many of the sentences...
Click to read more »remove the apostrophe per WP:DECADE; "1910–1922" --> "1910–22" per WP:DATERANGE; "1922–1947" --> "1922–47" (as above); "1948–1989" --> "1948–89" (as above);...
Click to read more »Comments Year ranges now need centuries at both ends of the range, per MOS:DATERANGE. Done.Krish | Talk 12:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC) Use en-dash for numerical...
Click to read more »giving c. 1556 – 1630, which I have already done in the article. See MOS:DATERANGE and {{circa}} for full details. ({{respell|met|zeh|TEE|no}}) giving (met-zeh-TEE-no)...
Click to read more »MOS:HEAD and MOS:DATERANGE problems. Also they're contravening WP:CRYSTAL. Blanking at Downton Abbey here. Another warning for MOS:DATERANGE and MOS:HEAD...
Click to read more »rename to Category:Northern Ireland MLAs 2011–16 to conform with MOS:DATERANGE and per other similar subcategories of Category:Members of the Northern...
Click to read more »from 2001–2008" -> "from 2000–07 and nine List A games from 2001–08", WP:DATERANGE Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC) Ref 46 (Cricket...
Click to read more »have been created with a hyphen instead of a dash as required by MOS:DATERANGE, and could be renamed Speedily, but I thought it would be useful to have...
Click to read more »to update it by the previous commentator per the 2016 changes to MOS:DATERANGE. Miyagawa (talk) 19:36, 25 March 2018 (UTC) I disagree completely with...
Click to read more »SchroCat (talk) 21:08, 4 March 2015 (UTC) Support Two final comments: WP:DATERANGE suggests using unspaced en dashes for ranges of days within the same month...
Click to read more »to being Grade I listed Pontypridd" - Comma after listed "1791-95" MOS:DATERANGE wants 1791–1795 "Located on the west side of Hopkinstown the Hetty Engine...
Click to read more »boston.com/simplesearch/SimpleSearchAction.do?s.si(simplesearchinput).dateRange=&s.sm.query=firefly web.archive.org/web/20060814235449/www.teevee...
Click to read more »17:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC) Timeline year ranges should comply with MOS:DATERANGE. Fixed Thrakkx (talk) 17:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC) Notes, be consistent...
Click to read more »SchroCat (talk) 21:08, 4 March 2015 (UTC) Support Two final comments: WP:DATERANGE suggests using unspaced en dashes for ranges of days within the same month...
Click to read more »chapter on verse on the general practice of how to handle headers after a daterange, but this editor not only ignored that but insulted Geraldo to boot)....
Click to read more »financial crisis - write this out a 2007–2008 (note the en-dash, –). See MOS:DATERANGE. Fixed: I used the article version of title complete with an en-dash using...
Click to read more »Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC) For Wikipedia, WP:DATERANGE and WP:SEASON might be helpful.—Wavelength (talk) 17:38, 10 November 2014...
Click to read more »Any recommendations? Milkunderwood (talk) 23:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC) WP:DATERANGE does not cover ranges in this format, but I think the only clear way to...
Click to read more »20:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC) "1940–1941" should be "1940–41" per WP:DATERANGE Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 20:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC) "carried 21 5 inch 51...
Click to read more »presumably be Category:Austerity in the United Kingdom (1939–52) per MOS:DATERANGE. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC) Why 1952? Food rationing...
Click to read more »The specific guideline about the use of en dashes in date ranges is MOS:DATERANGE. The short answer is that 2022-23 Futsal Club Championship should be moved...
Click to read more »second paragraph, change the year in "1973–74" to the full year per MOS:DATERANGE Done - Another MOS page I forgot about... In the third paragraph, the...
Click to read more »(UTC) @History6042: Addressed everything other the last two, per MOS:DATERANGE "Dates in month–day–year format require a comma after the day, as well...
Click to read more »career" contains date ranges only which needs to be crippled per MOS:DATERANGE. For eg: dates within same century should be 1954–74, instead of 1954–1974...
Click to read more »–♠Vamí_IV†♠ 13:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC) "1914–18" --> "1914–1918" Per MOS:DATERANGE. Done –♠Vamí_IV†♠ 04:27, 16 September 2022 (UTC) That's everything from...
Click to read more »Year ranges should avoid repeating the century if it's the same, per WP:DATERANGE. Avoid using hash to represent number per WP:HASH. Not sure the point...
Click to read more »;Comments from Jmnbqb Full date is needed in date range in infobox per MOS:DATERANGE Done Is there a reason for the "/-" in the infobox after the reward? Removed...
Click to read more »building, check out WP:DATERANGE, I thought 1901–1918 should be 1901–18. The Rambling Man, I corrected these to conform to WP:DATERANGE. -- West Virginian...
Click to read more »(UTC) 1818–23 - space isn't a premium in this col so you can apply MOS:DATERANGE here. OK formatted as 1818-1823.— Rod talk 20:55, 3 December 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »"from 1949–51", etc.: from 1949 to 1951. It's a WP:MOS thing. I think MOS:DATERANGE permits two-digit ending years for "infoboxes and tables where space is...
Click to read more »lead; Astor Library once No space should be between year dashes (MOS:DATERANGE) Is the lifespan graph necessary? or sourced? The articles is an orphan:...
Click to read more »Year ranges should avoid repeating the century if it's the same, per WP:DATERANGE. Avoid using hash to represent number per WP:HASH. Not sure the point...
Click to read more »"to train soldiers in Panama" whose soldiers? 1991–92→1991–1992 per MOS:DATERANGE "Kempe suggested $110,000 annually" over what period? "CIA director William...
Click to read more »though. Dates throughout are Month Day, Year. I changed one per WP:MILMOS#DATERANGE, but I may be wrong. I see no date issues otherwise. (added on 01:37,...
Click to read more »Markowitz (talk) 20:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC) The cite templates follow MOS:DATERANGE. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC) In the case of issue...
Click to read more »format, constructions such as "1859–1860" should be "1859–60" per WP:DATERANGE (except birth-death parentheticals); Done not sure about the comma here:...
Click to read more »contingent on actual notability). Putting intext:"emily temple-wood" daterange:245161-2456730 (searching only from March 2000 to March 2014) into Google...
Click to read more »(1921–24)" prbably should be "Operations in Waziristan (1921–1924)" per WP:DATERANGE, although it can be piped in the infobox. (Incidentally, I'd be fascinated...
Click to read more »that date so long as you format the date according to the rules at MOS:DATERANGE (linked from the error message's help text). This example tweaks your...
Click to read more »Note also that specifying dates such as (1953– ) contravenes MOS:DATERANGE; and it's not clear what such date ranges signify. Bazza (talk) 08:52...
Click to read more »contingent on actual notability). Putting intext:"emily temple-wood" daterange:245161-2456730 (searching only from March 2000 to March 2014) into Google...
Click to read more »2016 when RfC on date ranges was closed. That RfC changed how the MOS:DATERANGE is specified. Currently the names that contain a date-range are in the...
Click to read more »hyphen is incorrect, such as with date ranges and year ranges (see MOS:DATERANGE). In cases like that it is absolutely proper to make that edit. Wikipedia...
Click to read more »in good faith, was probably not an improvement per se. Generally, MOS:DATERANGE advises us to use spaced n-dashes in cases when dates in different years...
Click to read more »closest policies I could find about this tiny issue are MOS:ENTO and MOS:DATERANGE. MOS:ENTO says "For ranges between numbers, dates, or times, use an en...
Click to read more »the text. I have rectified that in your draft. Also, according to MOS:DATERANGE, an en dash should be used instead of a spaced hyphen when writing dates...
Click to read more »1#Dates, the idea is to use the same date format spec'd by the source. MOS:DATERANGE says to use an unspaced dash for a range unless one side or the other...
Click to read more »Sainte-Maxime commenced operations on the night of 23/24 August"? MOS:DATERANGE says either form is acceptable. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:56, 8 September...
Click to read more »1939 ..." or "from 1937 to 1939". from 19xx–xx is incorrect per MOS:DATERANGE. —Vensatry (talk) 20:12, 5 December 2018 (UTC) Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi...
Click to read more »to spelling out digits mid-sentence. Sample only, pls check all. MOS:DATERANGE, pick a style, all four digits is preferred ... 1904–05 also limited its...
Click to read more »SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:49, 14 March 2021 (UTC) Inconsistency on MOS:DATERANGE The Colonial Advocate and early years in York (1823–27) should be 1823–1827...
Click to read more »(The WP:SEAOFBLUE is overwhelming at some points.) Have a look at MOS:DATERANGE. WP:ENDASHES (with or without a space) are different depending on whether...
Click to read more »the winter of 1940/1941, Italians and Greeks fought in Albania"? MOS:DATERANGE indicates that the n-dash is correct. After this registration, as many...
Click to read more »Music! discography#Now Dance series (1985–2016) (link changed per MOS:DATERANGE) per above. QuietHere (talk) 06:56, 2 November 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)". According to MOS:DATERANGE the preferred form would be "c. 303 – c. 325", although that produces...
Click to read more »etc... "which took place from 20–26 June 2020" would disagree with MOS:DATERANGE which states "Use an en dash, or a word such as from or between, but not...
Click to read more »(UTC) Yes, there's a guideline for that, and it's at MOS:DATERANGE. For your cases, the dateranges would look like this: "June 25 – July 1, 1997" and "June...
Click to read more »writing. fixed "between 135–130 BC": "between 135 and 130 BC". See MOS:DATERANGE. fixed "Ancient writers, such as Cicero and Appian, mention the queen...
Click to read more »for your feedback. SatDis (talk) 23:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC) See MOS:DATERANGE. In the Members section, you switch mid-stream, but should generally use...
Click to read more »— The Earwig (talk) 05:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC) As mentioned in denial : "MOS:DATERANGE-compliant date to a non-compliant form. I don't have the know-how to tell...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC) Benjamin and Maud Cunnington, 1908-9 MOS:DATERANGE says better 1908-1909 Done. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library)...
Click to read more »of 1942–43 --> probably best to include the months here, also per WP:DATERANGE it should probably be presented as "1942–1943" Perry states that it was...
Click to read more »(UTC) OK, here are some general comments after my first skim through: MOS:DATERANGE says (in bullet 8): "Use an en dash, or a word such as from or between...
Click to read more »when the dates around the dash have spaces, the dash has spaces (MOS:DATERANGE) In her day, Awadewit (FA writer, RIP) would have pitched a fit that File:William...
Click to read more »": probably should be "...Churchill's 1841–1842 exhortations" per WP:DATERANGE Done Onceinawhile (talk) 09:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC) same as above for...
Click to read more »the section "Nazi Germany (1933–45)". Note that you must adhere to MOS:DATERANGE If available, I would add a picture column. I believe a number of pictures...
Click to read more »29 December 2021 (UTC) The dates in the table did not comply with MOS:DATERANGE. May 19 – 25 should be written May 19–25, or May 19 – May 25. There are...
Click to read more »ended in 850/1" the date range should be presented as "850–51" per MOS:DATERANGE. Done In the references ""Decimation". The Compact Edition of the Oxford...
Click to read more »year ranges such as "1906–1931" should be changed to "1906–31" per WP:DATERANGE; be careful of duplicate links. The duplicate link script reports a few...
Click to read more »does indeed. Thanks! It looks like this is the format prescribed in MOS:DATERANGE for a range between specific dates in different months, so that makes...
Click to read more »(talk) 03:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC) @ThatMontrealIP: See MOS:BIRTHDATE and MOS:DATERANGE. Hillelfrei talk 03:38, 15 May 2020 (UTC) @Hillelfrei: thanks, I have...
Click to read more »1938–1940 (1st formation) and 1942–1943 (2nd formation) respectively, per MOS:DATERANGE Done Section 1; Mention the modern equivalent for Komdiv in braces. Done...
Click to read more »and make sure you are the right side of WP:LQ Date formats. See MOS:DATERANGE for the very few exemptions to 2012–2013 format. There are a few places...
Click to read more »building, check out WP:DATERANGE, I thought 1901–1918 should be 1901–18. The Rambling Man, I corrected these to conform to WP:DATERANGE. -- West Virginian...
Click to read more »also nicer to have the Leonardo one "first"/on the left now See MOS:DATERANGE, I interpret it as saying that this should be two digits: Portrait of...
Click to read more »"yyyy–yyyy". It was an established policy to require 4-digit end years in MOS:DATERANGE. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 16:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC) Any person...
Click to read more »--Usernameunique (talk) 05:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC) New note: MOS:DATERANGE does not like the way the year ranges are expressed in the section headings...
Click to read more »as above TweakedEnigmaMcmxc (talk) 15:36, 3 August 2021 (UTC) per MOS:DATERANGE, use either an en dash, or a word such as from or between, but not both...
Click to read more »career" contains date ranges only which needs to be crippled per MOS:DATERANGE. For eg: dates within same century should be 1954–74, instead of 1954–1974...
Click to read more »1860–61 date range needs to be expanded to the full years as per MOS:DATERANGE I agree with A. Parrot that there is no need to give the French name for...
Click to read more »Rename. Two-digit years are permissible for consecutive years (see MOS:DATERANGE) and widely used in the parent hierarchy. – Fayenatic London 13:31, 5...
Click to read more »issue is that the hyphen was changed to a dash in accordance with MOS:DATERANGE. That's going to happen again. What do people think we should do here...
Click to read more »consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 129#WP:DATERANGE ambiguity and stylistic concerns Completed - (Initiated 3714 days ago...
Click to read more »big article, I'll review in bite-sized pieces. General According to MOS:DATERANGE, years should be 1942–1945, rather than 1942–45: it's a stupid rule, so...
Click to read more »;Comments from Jmnbqb Full date is needed in date range in infobox per MOS:DATERANGE Done Is there a reason for the "/-" in the infobox after the reward? Removed...
Click to read more »"from 1949–51", etc.: from 1949 to 1951. It's a WP:MOS thing. I think MOS:DATERANGE permits two-digit ending years for "infoboxes and tables where space is...
Click to read more »it looks like if you are pro-Kaifeng. But no big deal either way. MOS:DATERANGE advises against "1235–6" and "1203–57". Fixed the first; I'm not sure...
Click to read more »nickname in the lead. Done Date range in lead needs to be full dates per MOS:DATERANGE. Also, the dash should be an endash instead of an emdash. Done I think...
Click to read more »(UTC) 1818–23 - space isn't a premium in this col so you can apply MOS:DATERANGE here. OK formatted as 1818-1823.— Rod talk 20:55, 3 December 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Comment. A new RM has already opened with an unacceptable MOS:DATERANGE requested title and receiving much opposition. Also, the nom has not allowed...
Click to read more »second paragraph, change the year in "1973–74" to the full year per MOS:DATERANGE Done - Another MOS page I forgot about... In the third paragraph, the...
Click to read more »opening year (1881–1986)." WP:YEAR is silent on the matter. WP:MILMOS#DATERANGE (not that this bit of MOS applies here, but one I've used a fair amount)...
Click to read more »semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent ignorance of MOS:DATERANGE and other Wikipedia style guidelines. livelikemusic talk! 00:02, 28 January...
Click to read more »logs) Temporary semi-protection: Two IP-related mini-wars, one about MOS:DATERANGE, one thinking Wind and Wuthering was released in 1977, not 1976 (the latter...
Click to read more »lead; Astor Library once No space should be between year dashes (MOS:DATERANGE) Is the lifespan graph necessary? or sourced? The articles is an orphan:...
Click to read more »Moi 14:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC) 1657–58 should be 1657–1658 per MOS:DATERANGE Fixed in the image description and removed from the text. It doesn't flow...
Click to read more »though. Dates throughout are Month Day, Year. I changed one per WP:MILMOS#DATERANGE, but I may be wrong. I see no date issues otherwise. (added on 01:37,...
Click to read more »WP:REPEATLINK General formatting by script which is essentially MOS:TIME and WP:DATERANGE Added refimprove tag to article (TW) Only after these changes were made...
Click to read more »fortunes” … who turned around the club’s fortunes … more direct ? See MOS:DATERANGE. There is inconsistent year styles in the section headings: Early years...
Click to read more »query=ballet&n=50&daterange=full&sort=newest (6969, -1, X, X R/X/L) query.nytimes.com/search/query?query=ballet&n=50&dp=0&daterange...
Click to read more »delineate years. The slash can be used to indicate fiscal year, per WP:DATERANGE - Evad37 [talk] 05:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC) "In September 2013, construction...
Click to read more »format, constructions such as "1859–1860" should be "1859–60" per WP:DATERANGE (except birth-death parentheticals); Done not sure about the comma here:...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC) Benjamin and Maud Cunnington, 1908-9 MOS:DATERANGE says better 1908-1909 Done. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library)...
Click to read more »was created 2 days ago. Also it should be 1801–1923 (en-dash) per MOS:DATERANGE. Oculi (talk) 11:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC) Defer to outcome of conflicting...
Click to read more »also nicer to have the Leonardo one "first"/on the left now See MOS:DATERANGE, I interpret it as saying that this should be two digits: Portrait of...
Click to read more »"on the night of May 29/30" as suggested by MOS:DATERANGE Done. I wasn't aware of that part of DATERANGE was Van Dorn's army the Army of the West? Suggest...
Click to read more »(UTC) OK, here are some general comments after my first skim through: MOS:DATERANGE says (in bullet 8): "Use an en dash, or a word such as from or between...
Click to read more »writing. fixed "between 135–130 BC": "between 135 and 130 BC". See MOS:DATERANGE. fixed "Ancient writers, such as Cicero and Appian, mention the queen...
Click to read more »--Usernameunique (talk) 05:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC) New note: MOS:DATERANGE does not like the way the year ranges are expressed in the section headings...
Click to read more »to spelling out digits mid-sentence. Sample only, pls check all. MOS:DATERANGE, pick a style, all four digits is preferred ... 1904–05 also limited its...
Click to read more »closest policies I could find about this tiny issue are MOS:ENTO and MOS:DATERANGE. MOS:ENTO says "For ranges between numbers, dates, or times, use an en...
Click to read more »"2025/26 season", and I don't see what would be different here. --GA MOS:DATERANGE seems to use a yyyy/yyyy format. UTO have a more unified texts: "have...
Click to read more »when the dates around the dash have spaces, the dash has spaces (MOS:DATERANGE) In her day, Awadewit (FA writer, RIP) would have pitched a fit that File:William...
Click to read more »": probably should be "...Churchill's 1841–1842 exhortations" per WP:DATERANGE Done Onceinawhile (talk) 09:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC) same as above for...
Click to read more »etc... "which took place from 20–26 June 2020" would disagree with MOS:DATERANGE which states "Use an en dash, or a word such as from or between, but not...
Click to read more »storm here: http://query.nytimes.com/search/query?frow=0&n=10&srcht=s&daterange=period&query=storm&srchst=p&submit.x=26&submit.y=14&submit=sub&hdlque...
Click to read more »renamed to Category:Flanders campaign (1792–1795) under C2B, following MOS:DATERANGE, and extending the range to match the dates stated in the article. – Fayenatic...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:41, 28 November 2015 (UTC) "1909–1949" --> "1909–49" per WP:DATERANGE; Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC) "File:Jacob L. Devers...
Click to read more »29 December 2021 (UTC) The dates in the table did not comply with MOS:DATERANGE. May 19 – 25 should be written May 19–25, or May 19 – May 25. There are...
Click to read more »subcategories and sub-subcategories that contain a date range per MOS:DATERANGE procedural close. Apparently September 23 Category:Republic of Ireland...
Click to read more »the Parliament of Finland (1907–1908) Nominator's rationale: Per MOS:DATERANGE and Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_May_29#Category:MEPs_1952–58...
Click to read more »remove the apostrophe per WP:DECADE; "1910–1922" --> "1910–22" per WP:DATERANGE; "1922–1947" --> "1922–47" (as above); "1948–1989" --> "1948–89" (as above);...
Click to read more »preferred. For reference, it is the seventh major bullet point in MOS:DATERANGE, which says: An overnight period may be expressed using a slash between...
Click to read more »Date ranges: ...from 29 March to 26 April 1778 ... The guideline MOS:DATERANGE says that dashes are not permitted when "from" precedes the date range:...
Click to read more »20:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC) "1940–1941" should be "1940–41" per WP:DATERANGE Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 20:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC) "carried 21 5 inch 51...
Click to read more »including WP:LAYOUT, WP:CITE, MOS:REFPUNCT, MOS:DATEUNIFY, WP:DATERANGE/MOS:DATERANGE, WP:NBSP/MOS:NBSP, WP:NDASH/MOS:NUM, citation style consistency...
Click to read more »July 2025 The logo in the infobox seems to be missing alt text. Per MOS:DATERANGE I think the date in the infobox is considered "simple" since it takes...
Click to read more »suggestions: AustralianRupert (talk) 12:20, 10 October 2016 (UTC) per WP:DATERANGE: the guidance here has changed to full dates, e.g. "1923–29" --> "1923–1929"...
Click to read more »delineate years. The slash can be used to indicate fiscal year, per WP:DATERANGE - Evad37 [talk] 05:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC) "In September 2013, construction...
Click to read more »parens and conform to MOS:DATERANGE I feel the parentheses in this case isn't so undesirable and also allowed by MOS:DATERANGE. HaEr48 (talk) 23:46, 13...
Click to read more »(links) Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers (exists?) No 373 MOS:DATERANGE (links) Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers (exists?) No 374 MOS:DEATH...
Click to read more »1904–1905," and "of 1894–1895, both..." per the (newish) guidance at WP:DATERANGE Bah, I hate anything that makes me have to type anything extra. Bad RFC...
Click to read more »big article, I'll review in bite-sized pieces. General According to MOS:DATERANGE, years should be 1942–1945, rather than 1942–45: it's a stupid rule, so...
Click to read more »exceptions for proper and common nouns, and I'm aware that WP:MILMOS#DATERANGE may have other requirements. I'm not entirely sure which system you've...
Click to read more »–♠Vamí_IV†♠ 13:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC) "1914–18" --> "1914–1918" Per MOS:DATERANGE. Done –♠Vamí_IV†♠ 04:27, 16 September 2022 (UTC) That's everything from...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Year ranges need to conform to the new requirement of MOS:DATERANGE Done The space between the commanders in the infobox can be removed by...
Click to read more »aircraft_genericsearch=&airlinesearch=&countrysearch=&specialsearch=&daterange=&keywords=n2t&range=&sort_order=&page_limit=15&thumbnails=&calccount=...
Click to read more »Teriitaria's younger sister"? Changed "1814–15" --> "1814–1815" per MOS:DATERANGE Changed Described as an Amazon queen: suggest stating who described her...
Click to read more »time and created Module:daterange that can do multiple ones. {{#invoke:daterange|main|1997|2002}} → 1997–2002 {{#invoke:daterange|main|start=2020|end=2002}}...
Click to read more »year ranges such as "1906–1931" should be changed to "1906–31" per WP:DATERANGE; be careful of duplicate links. The duplicate link script reports a few...
Click to read more »the winter of 1940/1941, Italians and Greeks fought in Albania"? MOS:DATERANGE indicates that the n-dash is correct. After this registration, as many...
Click to read more »I went ahead and rendered the men's and women's tables as well. MOS:DATERANGE notes that non‑abbreviated years are generally preferred, so I would expand...
Click to read more »delineate years. The slash can be used to indicate fiscal year, per WP:DATERANGE - Evad37 [talk] 05:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC) "In September 2013, construction...
Click to read more »July 2025 The logo in the infobox seems to be missing alt text. Per MOS:DATERANGE I think the date in the infobox is considered "simple" since it takes...
Click to read more »check 1039 Archive index 1005 Bar 995 Infobox ship 982 Ice hockey box 976 Daterange 945 TOCyears 942 Armenian 939 TemplateStyles 935 CountryAdjectiveDemonym...
Click to read more »that message display in your common.css. MOS:DATES, particularly MOS:DATERANGE, does not allow hyphen separators in any date format except the year initial...
Click to read more »(UTC) @History6042: Addressed everything other the last two, per MOS:DATERANGE "Dates in month–day–year format require a comma after the day, as well...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC) This would fix some compliance with MOS:DATERANGE, which explicitly says to use en dashes and not hyphens for date ranges...
Click to read more »table/testcases 947 Adjacent stations/PKP Intercity 946 Sandbox/Matroc/Str swap 945 Daterange 945 TOCyears 942 Armenian 939 TemplateStyles 935 Location map/data/Mandatory...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) The logo in the infobox seems to be missing alt text. Per MOS:DATERANGE I think the date in the infobox is considered "simple" since it takes...
Click to read more »vice-president then president of the ULP in 1907–08" should be "1907–1908" (MOS:DATERANGE) Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Date ranges: ...from 29 March to 26 April 1778 ... The guideline MOS:DATERANGE says that dashes are not permitted when "from" precedes the date range:...
Click to read more »editor who was mass replacing non-abbreviated dates (preferred per MOS:DATERANGE and used in dozens FAs I checked) to abbreviated ones in the infoboxes...
Click to read more »Moi 14:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC) 1657–58 should be 1657–1658 per MOS:DATERANGE Fixed in the image description and removed from the text. It doesn't flow...
Click to read more »Philosophy/3 Editnotices/Page/Talk:Hybe Administrator elections/Header/daterange PDB Gallery/3096 PDB Gallery/8898 Attached KML/Colorado State Highway...
Click to read more »"2025/26 season", and I don't see what would be different here. --GA MOS:DATERANGE seems to use a yyyy/yyyy format. UTO have a more unified texts: "have...
Click to read more »1860–61 date range needs to be expanded to the full years as per MOS:DATERANGE I agree with A. Parrot that there is no need to give the French name for...
Click to read more »it looks like if you are pro-Kaifeng. But no big deal either way. MOS:DATERANGE advises against "1235–6" and "1203–57". Fixed the first; I'm not sure...
Click to read more »