Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia pages or media that meet one of the criteria for speedy deletion (CSD) listed below. Because deletion is reversible only by administrators, other...
Click to read more »section. In order to increase participation, many articles deleted via WP:CSD should instead be moved to userspace drafts. This is part of a series of...
Click to read more »WP:CSD.[April Fools!] Q28 (talk) 09:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC) Delete per nom 💜 melecie talk - 12:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC) Speedy delete as per CSD G1....
Click to read more »More CSD Contribute — Share this PDF download E-mail Mastodon LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter) Bluesky Reddit By Ral315 Two new speedy deletion...
Click to read more »about possible expansions to Wikipedia:Candidates for speedy deletion (WP:CSD). I have decided to bring a number of these proposals to a formal vote. Those...
Click to read more »CSD criteria Contribute — Share this PDF download E-mail Mastodon LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter) Bluesky Reddit By Ral315 Jimbo Wales this...
Click to read more »brand new interface to add WikiProject templates to talk pages, widespread CSD logging, integrated formatgeneral.js cleanup, automatic deletion of redirects...
Click to read more »was tagged for CSD A7 by an editor, 58 minutes after creation, at the same time he tagged Tornado Jockey, and Super Granny. Again CSD didn't apply due...
Click to read more »(UTC) User:EWS23/CSD/Neil Haverton Smith (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This page could probably be deleted per WP:CSD#G10, but it is part...
Click to read more »(UTC) Jengilson, Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address...
Click to read more »-KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:38, 2 April 2018 (UTC) User:L3X1/CSD log (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Collection of redlinks...
Click to read more »AfC submissions (deleted under CSD G13) and user subpages of users who have made few or no edits outside userspace (CSD U6). These abandoned pages are...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link csd-europe.com; 0 records. csd-europe.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck...
Click to read more »csd.org: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en...
Click to read more »CSD:R2, CSD:R3, CSD:F1, CSD:F2, CSD:F3, CSD:F4, CSD:F5, CSD:F6, CSD:F7, CSD:F8, CSD:F9, CSD:F10, CSD:F11, CSD:U1, CSD:U2, CSD:U3, CSD:T2, CSD:T3, CSD:P1...
Click to read more »(UTC) Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite...
Click to read more »and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Poti...
Click to read more »2012 (UTC) User:EWS23/CSD/Fall Out Boy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:STALEDRAFT since 2007. It contains a CSD A7 tag for reasons unknown...
Click to read more »was launched in 2003. I personally hate db-spam. It is one of the hardest CSD criteria because it is the poorest defined of the criteria. Personally, I...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 14:08...
Click to read more »discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:41, 10 June 2017 (UTC) Wikipedia:CSD Quicklinks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This template links...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Wikipedia:CSD Quicklinks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) SEE: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:CSD Quicklinks The links...
Click to read more »and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Batchesko...
Click to read more »csd.org: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en...
Click to read more »eager speedy deleters. The problem is that a careless, hasty, or overzealous CSD can be much worse than a common vandal. Vandalism is extremely easy to spot...
Click to read more »csd.gov.hk: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Speedy Delete: Per #4 of the General CSD. -- iMatthew T.C. 10:27, 15 July 2008 (UTC) CSD G4 the rules are clear. Darrenhusted (talk) 10:41...
Click to read more »csd.gov.hk: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on...
Click to read more »plausible drafts), and that the content it covered (when not covered by other CSD) was neither urgent to delete nor something that needed to be kept admin-eyes-only...
Click to read more »Quicklinks Over-hasty Speedy Deleters CSD A1 Survey CSD A7 Survey CSD G1 Survey CSD G10 Survey Survey Monkey Surveys 1.1-1.2-1.3- 1.4-1.5-1.6- 1.7-1.8-1...
Click to read more »for WP:CSD#U6. Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic Programming language(s): Perl Source code available: User:AnomieBOT/source/tasks/CsdU6Tagger...
Click to read more »~31% support. Click here to view results This was considered redundant with CSD#1: patent nonsense. An article that is unsalvageably unintellegible can be...
Click to read more »csd-leipzig.de: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...
Click to read more »of November 2009 I took part in an experiment called "Newbie treatment at CSD", or NEWT for short. The purpose of NEWT was to determine what happens when...
Click to read more »overturn the result at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 September 10#CSD:G1. If your proposing to change the specific application of policy to overturn...
Click to read more »deletion based on Wikipedia's speedy deletion policy. A Speedy Deletion (CSD) tag looks something like this: The contents inside the tag will differ according...
Click to read more »· undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · CSD log · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify) I'm shooting my shot...
Click to read more »(e.g., WP:CSD#A1, WP:CSD#A3, WP:CSD#G1, WP:CSD#G7, etc.). However, and in the interest of full disclosure, I also would have applied a WP:CSD#G7 speedy...
Click to read more »rationale provided, Image uploaded prior to May 4, 2006 so not elgible for CSD I6 MECU≈talk 17:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC) Uploaded by Ansbachdragoner (notify...
Click to read more »is for discussions about the scope of the Wikipedia:Newbie treatment at CSD project. This thread started on the prject page as "Doctor, they're coming...
Click to read more »(or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created. CSD R3, governing unlikely and malformed redirects, is nearly 20 years old, and...
Click to read more »alphabet It's a good warning for me to be more careful with CSDs. A couple caveats- generally the CSD tagger, not deleter, leaves the talk page messages (I...
Click to read more »The result was No. And it got deleted per CSD G6. North Korea was nominated for nuke. And it got deleted per CSD G3. Numberwang got wangernumbed. Obamacare...
Click to read more »Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present...
Click to read more »problems, it is done very often today already. Probably will make expansion of CSD's more acceptable because of the safeguard. -- Netoholic @ 00:06, 2005 Jan...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete - under CSD A1. Rudget. 15:48, 13 January 2008 (UTC) CWF Heavyweight Champonship (edit |...
Click to read more »detect deletion nominations when performed with the Page Curation tool. CSD logs made by Twinkle, were also accepted, based on the principle of good...
Click to read more »headed and the dates. The second edit, here, it was tagged for CSD. The specific tag, CSD A3, says "no content whatsoever, or consists only of external...
Click to read more »(discussion created by sock). Bbb23 (talk) 12:55, 21 July 2022 (UTC) Wikipedia:CSD Quicklinks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) moved out of userspace...
Click to read more »March 2011. Demi Lovato 16:47, 2 November 2006 deleted page Demi Lovato (csd a7; content was: 'Demi Lovato (born 20 August 1992 in USA, is an American...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Great CSD candidate except that hoaxes are explicitly excluded from CSD. Appears to be a blatant hoax. -- Mufka (u)...
Click to read more »continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding: From MFD to CSD, debates are continuing across Wikipedia about which portals should stay...
Click to read more »recently (rather recently) took to patrolling the CSD log to see if there were any articles with incorrect CSD tags or which could be salvaged; this article...
Click to read more »6 October 2009 (UTC) I'm not sure any of those reasons are relevant to CSD, and sadly I note that User talk:...and the circus leaves town is still a...
Click to read more »· rights · moves) · curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci) (assign...
Click to read more »nominations when performed with the Page Curation tool. We will also accept CSD logs made by Twinkle, which will be added to the leaderboard at the end of...
Click to read more »BencherliteTalk 10:00, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Wikipedia:Requests for comment/CSD pseudo-namespace (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) The appropriate...
Click to read more »without using the tools in CSD and continues to tag to get experience and reviews WP:CSD again to get a clearer understanding of CSD A7.--v/r - TP 13:30, 19...
Click to read more »CSDs and PRODs. HotCat – For adding categories to pages. MoreMenu MarkBlocked – Strikes out blocked usernames. Helps you know when to check for CSD G5...
Click to read more »nominations when performed with the Page Curation tool. We will also accept CSD logs made by Twinkle, which will be added to the leaderboard at the end of...
Click to read more »Wikiversity have been created. In discussion is a new speedy deletion criterion. CSD T3 ("Templates that are not employed in any useful fashion, and are either...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 74.71.36.136 (talk)...
Click to read more »one of the reasons I prefer Twinkle for dealing with CSD. I'm giving page curation another go for CSD tagging, but welcoming simultaneously to notifying...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ved.Maddison (talk)...
Click to read more »notable, but I would require sources for that conclusion. CSD4 CSD G1, patent nonsense CSD5 CSD A7, no assertion of notability Vandalism or or not: [3] Not...
Click to read more »changed - she's not notable. !! Justa Punk !! 23:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC) WP:CSD#G4 does not apply, regardless of the subject's notability status. This version...
Click to read more »deleted completely out-of-process in the first place, as there wasn't even a CSD criterion cited.) —Modernponderer (talk) 07:36, 27 November 2018 (UTC) Done...
Click to read more »23 May 2022 (UTC) @Jay I'm no admin so I can't see the history, but my CSD log says {G7 rationale: author blanked }. I have no objection to undeletion...
Click to read more »is not. WP:DP: the deletion policy. Prod, WP:PROD: proposed deletion. CSD, WP:CSD: speedy deletion. WP:BIO: the general notability guideline for biographies...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk)...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sengbe7 (talk) 23:09...
Click to read more »12 February 2021 (UTC) Please populate. I did one to prevent an empty cat CSD. -2pou (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC) dification}} Source (if applicable):...
Click to read more »the former even on user contrib pages right after each individual edit. CSD stands for Criteria for Speedy Deletion. If you believe an article meets...
Click to read more »[revisions] Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 194...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Frogman2099 (talk)...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stefanbazan (talk)...
Click to read more »found some sources and did a basic tidy-up of the article. Both users left CSD warnings on my talkpage, then removed them on reverting their tags. Neither...
Click to read more »(CSD) Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/InfotechRoids(Information technology on STEROIDS) (CSD) User:Rackbank/sandbox (CSD) Wikipedia talk:Articles...
Click to read more »(I • 3RR) • BL • Block (IPs • Log • OP • RFU) • Del ((A C I M R T) fD • CSD • DRV • List • Log • Proc • PRD) Dir • ER • HD • New (Us • Pgs)• Prot (Log...
Click to read more »week: More CSD — News and notes — Press coverage — Features and admins — Arbitration In this issue 2 October 2006 (all comments) More CSD News and notes...
Click to read more »discussion at WT:CSD, Archive 43. See discussion at WT:CSD, Archive 42. See discussion at WT:CSD, Archive 36. See discussions at WT:CSD Archive 37, Archive...
Click to read more »frequently: "deletion", 49 times; "checkuser" 47 times; "speedy" 42 times; "csd" 40 times. –B with one recusal ← Previous "Arbitration report" Next "Arbitration...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Robertslj (talk)...
Click to read more »7 03:19, 14 September 2009 (UTC) For those opposing due to my incorrect CSD tagging, posted for your consideration in that admins also make mistakes...
Click to read more »and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Writerpeytonjones...
Click to read more »"Wikipedia:Process wonk" (Deleting broken redirect to User:JzG/Wikipedia:Wonks per WP:CSD#G8. (BOT)) (view/restore) # 13:17, May 8, 2009 Chris G (talk | contribs |...
Click to read more »I would like to request the undeletion of this page draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it, I lost my Wikipedia...
Click to read more »discussions at WT:CSD, that articles should not normally be tagged for speedy deletion on the basis of CSD A1 (no context) or CSD A3 (no content) moments...
Click to read more »[2] is active at WP:Third Opinion already helps with admin tasks like WP:CSD is experienced on Wikipedia: registered >3 years ago; 4500 edits mostly over...
Click to read more »(UTC) Function overview: Deleting and nominating empty categories under WP:CSD#C1. Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic Programming language(s):...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cgherrera (talk)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (CSD), such as {{db-copyvio}}. Such articles can be easily tagged with a CSD tag using Wikipedia:Twinkle, upon which...
Click to read more »non-free image review A semi-speedy CSD (7-day waiting period) for orphaned non-free images (WP:CSD#I5) was added to WP:CSD in September 2005, per ordre de...
Click to read more »articles have lost to overzealous CSDs. Something that has been around for 5+ years should never be deleted with a CSD. TryKid [dubious – discuss] 19:21...
Click to read more »CSD criterion G8 has been tightened such that the only redirects that it now applies to are those which target non-existent pages. The scope of CSD criterion...
Click to read more »Maproom (talk) 07:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC) Speedy delete — Per nom and CSD A7, CSD G11. CSD tag added to article. Murph9000 (talk) 09:55, 4 October 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Lord...
Click to read more »does not look like you have you done any CSD work, have you? I can't see deleted contribs but I see no CSD warnings. I also did not find any extensive...
Click to read more »that are being routinely vandalized, and deleting pages that clearly meet CSD criteria. I would also be adding myself to Category:Wikipedia administrators...
Click to read more »6 PM IST Venue: Sarai-CSDS, 29 Rajpur Road, Civil Lines Delhi - 110054, India, Ph no: 91-11-23928391, 23942199 CSD's Inn (CSDS Sarai) mainly in North...
Click to read more »and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Paulinazawislak...
Click to read more »editor, they have a great contributions history in general, with a history of CSD tagging, and over 30% of edits to the Wikipedia space. I've had the pleasure...
Click to read more »CSD criteria: New image CSD criterion added . ArbCom election: A look at the upcoming Arbitration Committee elections . Esperanza group: New group aims...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete as WP:CSD#A7, WP:CSD;G11 and WP:VSCA. Guy (Help!) 00:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC) DJ Emir (edit |...
Click to read more »either the school district or locality page That schools are exempt from CSD A7 There are still plenty of reasons why a first draft may be totally unsuitable...
Click to read more »15 February 2017 (UTC) Comment from the person who filed two CSDs: I've filed two CSDs and he has removed them. I did not use A or G, I used a custom...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Papanazz (talk) 22:00...
Click to read more »PortalGuard Software Bin Weevils (Accepted) Cristina Jimenez Jakob Osborne (CSD G2) Printrbot (Accepted) Loyl Hershell Stromberg Infastech Ian Shepherd (Accepted)...
Click to read more »and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Daleenton...
Click to read more »undercount). This Quarry query, added together with the count of your CSDs in your Twinkle CSD log, will give you an almost accurate count. Shortcut WP:NPPADMINWP:NPPADMIN...
Click to read more »redirect, if Twinkle user is an admin, or else WP:CSD#R2 nominating the redirect) removes any CSD, PROD, expired AFD tags or hangon tags comments out...
Click to read more »[revisions] Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you....
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article qualifies for speedy under CSD-G5. It was created by Xtinadbest, a user with over 20 socking cases and 50...
Click to read more »should not be tagged for speedy deletion as having no context (CSD A1) or no content (CSD A3) moments after creation . Overhasty speedy deletion tagging...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Taz4535 (talk) 02:08...
Click to read more »and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy...
Click to read more »and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Muggins91...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. WP:CSD#A7 would also apply. postdlf (talk) 22:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC) Locust Fork...
Click to read more »of Wiki-Zeland), the article may be tagged for speedy deletion as a hoax (CSD G3), or alternatively have deletion proposed. If there is no evident claim...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Misswenessqueeness...
Click to read more »that 500 reports to AIV, as well as myriad CSD tags. On the subject of CSD tagging, Ale jrb has not had a CSD tag declined (link is admin-only, sorry.....
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) WP:CSD#A1 and WP:CSD#A3. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 08:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC) Speedy close Invalid AFD nom (CSDs are for... CSDs...) Article has...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy Deleted per CSD A7 RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC) Brandvery (edit |...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 88.104.27.18 (talk) 13:14,...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pen Bull (talk) 19:00...
Click to read more »vehemently disagree with rolling Twinkle CSD/PROD/XfD access in with this right/group. Admins have to review any CSD, expired PROD, and XfD discussion, so...
Click to read more »changes ones perspective on CSD and that admins tend to be more conservative when handling CSD requests than editors requesting CSD. TFOWR 13:00, 10 September...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it....
Click to read more »MediaWiki:Deletereason-dropdown has had reasons for deletion shortened, as well as the CSD being updated. MediaWiki:Blockedtext has been made more specific. Internationalisation...
Click to read more »(UTC) Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation...
Click to read more »a db-spam type csd for user pages.--Andeh 14:45, 24 October 2006 (UTC) I have to disagree. Nowhere in WP:CSD does it say that only CSD U1-U3 apply to...
Click to read more »provides warnings to new editors who don't yet understand that removing a CSD template is not the right way to object to speedy deletion. SDPatrolBot delivers...
Click to read more »company, fails WP:CORP. Article was nominated for WP:CSD as spam, but an IP editor removed the CSD tag in his or her first and only edit to an article...
Click to read more »done. @Abid2310: The article was not deleted under CSD G13, it was deleted under CSD G11 and CSD G12 (unambiguous promotion and copyright infringement...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vviki (talk) 09:20...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy Delete per Mal Case also under CSD G12. AinslieL (talk) 08:33, 13 June 2010 (UTC) Delete, CSD G12 concerns aside, most of this is excessive...
Click to read more »copyright violation.. It was also flagged for multiple reasons: WP:CSD#A7, WP:CSD#G11, WP:CSD#G12. Of those, the copyright-infringement makes the content irredeemable...
Click to read more »week: More CSD — News and notes — Press coverage — Features and admins — Arbitration In this issue 2 October 2006 (all comments) More CSD News and notes...
Click to read more »and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Garysays...
Click to read more »and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Nurd1...
Click to read more »privacy policy. Clarification from the community has been sought as to whether CSD G10, which allows for attack pages to be speedy deleted, applies to redirects;...
Click to read more »respect to the actual CSD (e.g. "unremarkable subject (CSD A7)", "suspected copyright infringement (CSD I9)", and "empty category (CSD C1)"). Moreover, they...
Click to read more »and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Copebebo...
Click to read more »and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. VocalIndia...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard, and has been assisting at WP:CSD, WP:PROD and WP:AfD. Gonzonoir (nom), also from the UK, works in new-page...
Click to read more »and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Uprising...
Click to read more »content except the article wizard placeholder text.. I further note that CSD:G13 does not have any exception written in regarding having been kept at...
Click to read more »more careful not to tag CSD and did a PROD. If you think it can be a CSD article then please tag it with CSD. I'd prefer CSD to AfD for this article --nafSadh...
Click to read more »csd, because it was deleted by csd last time he posted it. -Zeus- [t|c] 15:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC) It is valid for CSD. Just not tagging as WP:CSD G4...
Click to read more »Design Services . Was speedied under WP:CSD#G12 after author twice removed request for speedy ( WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#G11). Self-promotion and product placement...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 91.125.123.83 (talk)...
Click to read more »policies; I have numerous reports, comments, and votes at WP:AFD, WP:AIV, and WP:CSD. I also regularly patrol Usernames for Administrator intervention (which...
Click to read more »January 2019 (UTC) Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dprotsouk (talk)...
Click to read more »under at least two criteria: WP:CSD#G11 (promotion) and WP:CSD#G5 (Creation by a blocked editor), and arguably also WP:CSD#A7 (no credible indication of...
Click to read more »incorrectly tagging articles for CSD. I'd be glad to support later on when Grey has a better understanding of the CSD process. --Chetblong (talk) 16:07...
Click to read more »however, has been article maintainence (little fixes), Articles for Deletion, CSD and new page patrolling and more recently I've also started helping out on...
Click to read more »no context (CSD A1), contains no content whatsoever (CSD A3), consists only of links elsewhere (CSD A3) or a rephrasing of the title (CSD A3). Austrian...
Click to read more »particular: remove the lookup for the CSDs, replacing it with a CSD for dummies like below. The most frequently arising CSDs are common sense - paper encyclopedias...
Click to read more »talk page, and can lead to merry-go-rounds. If the article is CSD/AfD borderline, CSD it. If nothing else, it causes the editor to add references and...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#G11. Bbb23 (talk) 08:04, 22 June 2014 (UTC) Lokxion Foundation (edit |...
Click to read more »(UTC) Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation...
Click to read more »repetition of 'unambiguous' and similar insistence on clarity. The key for CSD is "do you have literally any doubt that the criterion applies?". If so,...
Click to read more »11 October 2012 (UTC) Additional Comment in theory, this may qualify for CSD A7, but I would like to hear others' views on it. --WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 02:09...
Click to read more »opposers are recognised by many of those supporting. The problematic past CSD tagging is clearly relevant to the area in which Slon02 proposes to take...
Click to read more »AfD because CSD removed by apparent SPA. ttonyb1 (talk) 14:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete probable WP:CSD#G3 hoax, but anyway WP:CSD#A7 - absolutely...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 15:21...
Click to read more »obvious-enough promotion that they can be dealt with by speedy deletion (CSD), but many others cannot; the authors have learnt that they require references...
Click to read more »July 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom. Note that this page has been deleted under CSD:A7 in the past (see logs). Poltair (talk) 07:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »Subject fails WP:BIO, and WP:N. The article also falls under the CSD parts WP:CSD#A7, and WP:CSD#G10. Nenyedi • (Deeds•Talk) 18:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AdamDeanHall (talk)...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete WP:CSD#A7, WP:CSD#A1, WP:CSD#G1. Guy (Help!) 17:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC) Ubermensch (habbo)...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wells2123 (talk)...
Click to read more »Chetsford (talk) 06:01, 14 May 2017 (UTC) DELETED AS WP:CSD#A7, WP:CSD#G11 WITH A DASH OF WP:CSD#G12 Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:04, 14 May 2017 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »prodded as it is a NN product for which no CSD applies. There is a middle ground between CSD and AFD. Until/unless CSD is broadened, we still have PROD. Cheers...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jayce921 (talk) 20:18...
Click to read more »article namespace. SDPatrolBot II – Notify creators of articles tagged for CSD. Yobot (Task 11) – Auto-untagging of orphans, deadend and uncategorised pages...
Click to read more »19:59, 11 November 2009 (UTC) Interesting. I won't be doing any further CSD's, as it appears they're really not worth the energy. Might even give a pass...
Click to read more »speedily deleted four times within the last few days under WP:CSD#G11 (twice), WP:CSD#G12, and WP:CSD#A3. The article is no longer unambiguous promotion, copyvio...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —Matthew - (talk)...
Click to read more »Speed delete - I agree. "CSD A7" it. --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδιτоr 01:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete Per nom and ors, it's a clearcut CSD A7. Thewinchester (talk)...
Click to read more »Removed from WP:CSD#G10: "Administrators deleting such pages should not quote the content of the page in the deletion summary" In WP:CSD#R2, changed the...
Click to read more »on a person that does not assert notability. Related: WP:VAIN; close to CSD #1 Anthony James Cartwright (born November 27, 1970) is an English Computer...
Click to read more »most of the CSDs below really are articles without meaningful content... which is what CSD is meant to deal with. Yes, there are some bad CSD A7 taggings...
Click to read more »was not deleted because of a copyright violation. It was deleted because CSD:A7: Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested CSD-A7. IP repeatedly removes CSD tags. Not notable person, reads like a resume. GregJackP (talk)...
Click to read more »Triple H, if that is indeed what is article is arguing. Listed rather than CSD so more knowledge WWE folks can comment. Greedyhalibut (talk) 20:47, 24 May...
Click to read more »initial influx of 4000 CSD's would be a strain on anyone working CAT:CSD, can this be set to only flag new loney categories for CSD? — xaosflux Talk 22:46...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kote kas (talk) 16:19...
Click to read more »CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Юрій Кріль (talk) 20:01, 14 March 2020 (UTC) Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD...
Click to read more »lacking in-depth, non-trivial sources. CSD was declined based on, "subject won an election." Editor that removed CSD failed to follow WP:POLITICIAN, "Just...
Click to read more »have put a csd banned on a few of his articles and a normal prod also) Wgolf (talk) 17:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G5 (creation...
Click to read more »stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ] This is otherwise speedy-deletable under WP:CSD#R3. However, what happened was, this page was nominated for deletion at this...
Click to read more »site. Probably falls under CSD:A7 (no assertion of importance in the article) and CSD:G11 (clearly promotional), but CSD tag was removed and subsequent...
Click to read more »and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Kinshipmaster...
Click to read more »28 July 2011 (UTC) Comment - this was originally closed using WP:CSD#U1, but that CSD explicitly states it does not apply to user talk pages. As this particular...
Click to read more »certainly might be a good basis for a recreation that would not be subject to CSD G4 as a "repost". It is also true here that the [2nd] deletion discussion...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Peteihis (talk) 07:26...
Click to read more »(UTC) Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation...
Click to read more »time helping out with two main areas that I know most about, WP:AIV and WP:CSD. I also will help out with WP:AFDs, mostly closing consensus deletes or keeps...
Click to read more »perform in the 2008 Battle of the Bands". CSD G7 perhaps? Bart133 (t) (c) 02:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC) I dont know CSD criteria as well since I havent gotten...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#G1. --Wafulz 03:03, 9 April 2007 (UTC) ED 2 (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 03:53...
Click to read more »substantial edits by others. See CSD G5." (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BabbarJatt Reason for contesting stated as "CSD contested: sourced article...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. | abequinnfourteen...
Click to read more »CSD criteria: New image CSD criterion added . ArbCom election: A look at the upcoming Arbitration Committee elections . Esperanza group: New group aims...
Click to read more »[revisions] Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you....
Click to read more »already an admin. Looking further, I found his massive and highly accurate CSD log, which assured me that he has a good understanding of what is required...
Click to read more »[revisions] Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 49...
Click to read more »January 2019 (UTC) Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address...
Click to read more »--ARTEST4ECHO talk 20:26, 21 September 2010 (UTC) Speedy Delete under CSD A7 and possibly CSD G11. JeremyMcClean (Talk) 21:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC) Agree...
Click to read more »always benefit from more admin eyes as well as lending a hand at UAA and CSD when necessary. It is my opinion that N419BH is a very clueful, dedicated...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MogeebMosleh (talk)...
Click to read more »need to be immediately blocked Category:Candidates for speedy deletion (CAT:CSD) – pages tagged for speedy deletion The following venues (not necessarily...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Boxinghalloffame (talk) 19:39...
Click to read more »total of 4,446 edits with most of my deleted being the work of my work in CSD nominations.I honestly try to assist anywhere I'm needed, but I'm simply...
Click to read more »Acmar Group (notify | contribs). Orphan; linking page was deleted under CSD jonny-mt(t)(c) 04:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC) Image:Abdul Samad Maharuddin...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy Delete Fails CSD:A7. Outside of CSD, fails WP:BIO. — NMChico24 04:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete per CSD-A7, no assertion of notability...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 360mph (talk) 19:14...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 00:40...
Click to read more »(chose only one): a. The Deletion department, where your job was to close CSDs, PRODs, and AfDs. b. The Vandalism department, where your job was to patrol...
Click to read more »website. Qualifies for WP:CSD A3 but is related to current events. Reywas92Talk 00:49, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete per CSD:A3- article contains nothing...
Click to read more »substantially Added to WP:CSD#G3: "and blatant hoaxes" Added to WP:CSD#G4: link to the proposal called WP:RECREATE In WP:CSD#A9, changed "has never existed...
Click to read more »under the GFDL. For more examples see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. WP:CSD#F6: Non-free images that contain no use rationale whatsoever should be speedy...
Click to read more »remotely encyclopedic about, well, anything. This smells more like a WP:CSD#G1 to me. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 06:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC) What's weird is...
Click to read more »meet CSD criteria. Is NN or NFT on its own sufficient reason to CSD? Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 20:12, 16 October 2007 (UTC) Kim: Absolutely not. CSD requirements...
Click to read more »run amok. Dlohcierekim 21:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC) Struck support per CSD concerns. Dlohcierekim 16:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC) support --.snoopy. ...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ocr69am (talk) 13:25...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fairnesssm11 (talk)...
Click to read more »to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy delete as WP:CSD#U1/WP:CSD#G7. ✗plicit 11:39, 10 January 2022 (UTC) User talk:ChromiumOverload/Archive...
Click to read more »< July 2 July 4 > The result of the debate was speedy delete per CSD R1 (non-existing target). -- Black Falcon (Talk) 20:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC) Redirects...
Click to read more »the article you did not remove the CSD tag? A:Initially I left it so as people could see an incorrectly tagged CSD "as is/in the wild". Partly I believed...
Click to read more »Safiel (talk) 03:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC) Snow delete. There needs to be a CSD category for this sort of thing. Has there been an RfC on that? Articles...
Click to read more »"delete" at AFD, or clearly meet a CSD article criterion). If a draft meets one of the general CSD criteria, an appropriate CSD tag can also be added. If you...
Click to read more »Delete. It clearly fails notability criteria for films. Why isn't there a CSD for this?. Or does A7 qualifies?. --Legion fi (talk) 09:49, 24 April 2011...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was speedily deleted by User:TParis per CSD A7. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 25 September 2014 (UTC) Jagannath...
Click to read more »after final warning for removal of CSD tags and creation of inappropriate pages single use account Number1edit removed CSD tags again. It's clear that the...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy deleted per WP:CSD#G3 and WP:CSD#G10 for the derogatory names listed in the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk)...
Click to read more »September 2017 (UTC) Not done. @Egandb: It wasn't deleted under CSD G13, it was deleted under CSD G11 as unambiguous promotion. You'd have to ask the deleting...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#A7 + WP:CSD#G11 §FreeRangeFrogcroak 06:53, 1 February 2015 (UTC) Vesicatoria (edit |...
Click to read more »result was speedy deleted by User:Anthony.bradbury per WP:CSD#G1: Patent nonsense and WP:CSD#G3: Blatant hoax. Non-admin closure. KuyaBriBriTalk 20:37...
Click to read more »hoaxes. Catchpole (talk) 15:13, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Comment. Yes there is. WP:CSD#G3 may be used for blatant hoaxes. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:25, 5 May 2008...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 86.6.47.159 (talk) 17:19, 8...
Click to read more »December 2018 (UTC) (Non-Administrator-Comment) This article was deleted as WP:CSD G11 (Blatant advertisement) and will not be restored. Feel free to start...
Click to read more »(UTC) Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G3 vandalism. JohnCD (talk) 15:31, 20 May 2016 (UTC) Dlokcuc (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »result of the debate was Speedy Delete via CSD T1. Now, before you lynch me, please allow me to explain. CSD T1 was created in order to prevent userboxes...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TimBecherer (talk)...
Click to read more »give out film awards; I suspect frivolity" was the CSD reason given by User:Pegship. Since it is not CSD criteria, I've brought here for discussion. Maxim...
Click to read more »deletion, with approximately 12,000 deleted edits, the majority of which are csd tagging and prods. He is also very active at AFD. Blanchardb is no slouch...
Click to read more »– (View log) CSD A7: Unremarkable people (Twinkle CSD tab still not working for me) Tckma (talk) 18:00, 22 July 2008 (UTC) Obvious CSD candidate. BALEET...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I axed this earlier on CSD G11 grounds, but its been recreated. Supposedly its got notability, but the...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. CSD G7. Liz Read! Talk! 19:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG. I refused a CSD on it because it didn't quite qualify, but the company is simply non-notable...
Click to read more »language(s): Python Source code available: Soon Function overview: Replace CSD tags on pages if the tags are removed by the author Links to relevant discussions...
Click to read more »for violating several CSD provisions: CSD G4: recreation of a previously-deleted article CSD G5: created by a blocked user CSD G12: blatant copyright...
Click to read more »is sacred in the world, can't we get a CSD here?!?!?!?! — Timneu22 · talk 13:37, 23 June 2010 (UTC) Whats a CSD? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gardeningtips...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 12:17...
Click to read more »just qualify as "no content" under CSD? Cdtew (talk) 17:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC) Speedy delete Tagged as WP:CSD#G3 JayJayWhat did I do? 17:48, 29 December...
Click to read more »WP:CSD#A7. Can't see any reason why this is important from that. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 01:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7...
Click to read more »unless they were among finalists. Also because of well defined policies at WP:CSD#A1.--Andersmusician VOTE 02:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC) CSD2 - Delete After having...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ashishtambe 10:39...
Click to read more »(T/C) 19:52, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete under WP:CSD#G11, blatant advertising, and WP:CSD#G12 as copyright infringement, as per Grey Wanderer. Yngvarr...
Click to read more »content so CSD A7 doesn't apply. Not speedy delete. CSD A7 doesn't apply. Not speedy delete. CSD A7 doesn't apply. Not speedy delete. CSD A7 doesn't apply...
Click to read more »Help:Contents A redesign of Wikipedia's main help page has been proposed. New CSD criterion A new criterion for speedy deletion was proposed that would be...
Click to read more »Accounting4Taste:talk 00:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete - CSD A7 and CSD 11. Fails WP:N. Tiptoety talk 01:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete...
Click to read more »Speedy Delete CSD-G11. Single purpose account dedicated to pushing that website. Resolute 02:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC) Speedy Delete CSD G11. Super-blatant...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 74.138.110.114 (talk)...
Click to read more »12:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC) Not done. Articles deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 cannot be undeleted by request on this page, as has been explained to...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This page was previously deleted under CSD, and I don't think it's current incarnation is going to fare any better....
Click to read more »Fails WP:NOTABLE. I added CSD A7 tag just now. I also fixed AfD template to point to the correct page. Feel free to remove my CSD if you feel it's inappropriate...
Click to read more »to find edits in which an editor is adding a CSD tag. It finds these by searching for the words "db, "CSD", etc. Upon finding such an edit, it checks the...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was speedy deleted by User:Jimfbleak per CSD A7, "No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web...
Click to read more »I can't see a suitable CSD category" -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete CSD or no CSD, there's no reason to let...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. TFSyndicate (talk) 14:50, 17...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G11, also WP:CSD#G5, yet another re-creation of self-promotional article by a yet...
Click to read more »template sandboxes with their main versions MyCSD (source) by User:Music1201 – Adds a link to the toolbar for your CSD log. You wont be accidentally logged out...
Click to read more »TWL) Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. Candidate for CSD, but CSD continues to be removed by SPA. reddogsix (talk) 22:58, 23 February 2015...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was CSD A3/CSD G10 (appears to be an attempt at communication with subject of article...
Click to read more »has supposedly helped. The page was speedy-deleted 2013-04-12 for WP:CSD#A12/WP:CSD#G12 (i.e. copy-paste website spam); deleted via Wikipedia:Articles for...
Click to read more »(aeropagitica) (talk) 09:55, 30 June 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete, per CSD A1 and possibly CSD G3, as evidenced by the topic and by nonsensical statements such...
Click to read more »that had already been deleted per CSD A7.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7 and per above. --Finngall talk...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC) Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace...
Click to read more »per CSD A7. - Mgm|(talk) 20:51, July 21, 2005 (UTC) Non-notable. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 17:06, 21 July 2005 (UTC) Speedy delete under new CSD for...
Click to read more »Speedy, fails WP:CSD A7. Zakhalesh (talk) 15:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC) Speedy - there's no need for this AfD, as it's a blatant CSD:A7 (and it already...
Click to read more »Tagged for recreation of deleted material (CSD G4). SYCTHOStalk 16:45, 29 January 2006 (UTC) It's not a repost... CSD G4 refers to content that actually reached...
Click to read more »Function overview: Nominate for Speedy Deletion articles that are valid for CSD:G13 (Stale/Abandoned) Articles for Creation submissions that have not been...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was speedy delete as a blatant hoax per WP:CSD#G3. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 01:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC) Imtiaz...
Click to read more »deleted by Materialscientist, multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria CSD G1, CSD G11. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC) Chase Jeter (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »as a whole. The group currently has about 52 members. Also this week: New CSD criterion — ArbCom election series — Esperanza — News and notes — Press coverage...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Racebuilder (talk)...
Click to read more »claim or evidence of notability. A CSD was removed by the article creator which is inappropriate so I am reinstating a CSD A7. AllyD (talk) 06:53, 8 August...
Click to read more »all opposed to a CSD, but I do feel obliged to point out that I first prodded the article (prod removed), then AfD'd it, then a CSD-tag was applied. Not...
Click to read more »(UTC) Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation...
Click to read more »speedy deleted, recreation of previously deleted and userfied article, CSD A7, CSD G4 -- The Anome 12:46, 26 September 2006 (UTC) Vanity page and duplicate...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Meets speedy deletion criteria WP:CSD#A7, WP:CSD#G11, WP:CSD#G12 at [1]. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 04:08, 9 August 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »result of the debate was Speedy Delete via CSD T1. Now, before you lynch me, please allow me to explain. CSD T1 was created in order to prevent userboxes...
Click to read more »October 2014 (UTC) Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address...
Click to read more »August 2014 (UTC) Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I need the content...
Click to read more »David Fuchs (talk · contribs) responded, "Is there a reason you deleted C:CSD?" With no explanation for the deletion, David Fuchs restored the page. At...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Deplan febyes (talk)...
Click to read more »Dollar Store Wrestling and removed CSD tag after numerous warnings, was finally blocked. IP has started to remove CSD tag again, ignoring warnings (see...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jockdoubleday (talk)...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was SNOW Deleted per CSD. I suspect the editor doesn't understand notability as against advertising...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it....
Click to read more »like an essay written as a school project. We need a CSD for this. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 19:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC) Speedy delete...
Click to read more »satisfies WP:CSD, and don't close Afds in favor of delete unless you're an admin. See WP:NAC. There's a few other troubling AfDs and CSDs, but I won't...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy deleted, CSD-A7. ➨ ЯEDVERS 10:45, 14 September 2006 (UTC) This appears to be a vanity...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7, new organization with no indication of significance. —David Eppstein...
Click to read more »of notability. Horrorshowj (talk) 18:20, 10 June 2010 (UTC) Speedy Delete CSD A7 per the three comments above this one. AinslieL (talk) 08:23, 13 June...
Click to read more »20:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC) LOOOOOL....Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G10 I wouldn't delete per WP:CSD#G1 because the redirect is not nonsense, it ...disparages...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7, WP:CSD#G10, WP:CSD#G12. Bbb23 (talk) 01:13, 21 December 2013 (UTC) Youths against...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. A.J.Converse (talk)...
Click to read more »AFD and at CSD, let's go through with the AFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC) Creator/Subject stripped the original CSD but that was...
Click to read more »StaticGull Talk 17:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#G11. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 17:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »article is about half of a hair away from meeting CSD criterion G12 if you're stringent in following CSD criteria; I probably could have gotten it deleted...
Click to read more »the CSD notice was intended to prevent an inappropriate CSD from being accepted. Anthony was not familiar with the guidelines on contesting a CSD. Due...
Click to read more »not notable & vanity. These aren't valid WP:CSD, so I've moved to VfD. (No assertion of notability is a CSD, but the article asserts that the subject is...
Click to read more »constitute a fundamental rewrite of the article in question and hence meet the WP:CSD#G11 criteria. Moving on to the Uche Odoputa article, I made a wrong judgement...
Click to read more »AdultmerchantPay, which I nominated for CSD before I realized there was already an AfD for this equivalent page. Clear CSD G11 anyway. --Jaysweet (talk) 14:57...
Click to read more »23:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC) Not even 48 hours passed since the CSD tag was placed. That CSD is faster than XfD is kind of built into the name... — Rhododendrites...
Click to read more »speedy delete. by Jimfbleak, multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria CSD A7, CSD G11). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC) Tom Black (entrepreneur)...
Click to read more »Result: Speedily deleted under CSD A7 - January 21, 2007 Chronicle of the Annoying Quest Result: Speedily deleted under CSD A7 - June 18, 2007 Cockbite Result:...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was speedy deleted by User:Deb per CSD G11 and CSD A7, "Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria G11, A7". (Non-administrator...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.163.144.190 (talk)...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result of the discussion was speedy deleted WP:CSD#G11 JohnCD (talk) 21:53, 21 November 2009 (UTC) More self-advertising that...
Click to read more »February 2014 (UTC) Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Non-notable. What about CSD A7? Imoeng 14:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC) Comment: This is a weird one for CSD A7. A7 is more for people, groups,...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 76.28.204.208 (talk)...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result of the discussion was: Speedied. Attack page (CSD G10). Obviously created to hassle or tease someone named Dan. Newyorkbrad...
Click to read more »per the snowball clause and at least two of of the following: CSD G1, CSD G3,CSD A1, CSD A7. Nihiltres(t.l) 19:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC) Rivastreet (edit |...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) Contested PROD: debut EP by band whose article has been CSD A7 speedied; completely unsourced; no details other than a tracklist. Stormie...
Click to read more »was Speedy Deleted and salted as recreated non-notable spam (WP:CSD#G8 WP:CSD#A7 WP:CSD#G11). Has been deleted 5 times previously as well as obvious unanimous...
Click to read more »other CSD proposals, and I wonder why it has been included under CSD proposals, since it is not about CSD criteria, and has been added after CSD voting...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G4. postdlf (talk) 16:05, 31 August 2013 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...
Click to read more »not realize this was a mistake; as per the CSD notice, if you are fixing the article, you can remove the CSD notice. Please see if the new info added to...
Click to read more »notability criteria. The topic would be WP:CSD#A7-able as "no indication of importance" if it were an article and WP:CSD#U5-able as "not web host" if it were...
Click to read more »June 2017 (UTC) Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address...
Click to read more »Under current CSD rules, I just couldn't justify it. I do think it's another reason to look at slightly widening candidate categories for CSD. Joyous 02:45...
Click to read more »interpretation I believe it fits CSD. I re-tagged for CSD. EvilPhoenix talk 07:31, August 5, 2005 (UTC) It specifically does not fit the CSD. It is not a person,...
Click to read more »page was recreated today by Metalskitz. After I requested csd, Metalskitz187 removed the csd tag. Metalskitz187 appears to be a sock puppet of article's...
Click to read more »spam attack by an IP who's only edit was to add the CSD tag. The article in question was put up for CSD on 17 June 2010 after being created by user:Kelangboy...
Click to read more »and Sep 2015; twice under CSD A7 and once through this AfD discussion. Jan 2016: Ventom Network India P.L. Deleted under CSD A7. Dec 2015: Ventom Network...
Click to read more »talk 05:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Speedy Delete Per CSD R2 LetsdrinkTea 20:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Note: CSD R2 says "except the Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:...
Click to read more »these two activities, I would appreciate the ability to clear backlogs at C:CSD and close debates at WP:AFD; I'd certainly like to take a bite into those...
Click to read more »qualified for speedy deletion under CSD A1. StephenBuxton (talk) 12:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete as per WP:CSD#A1. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result of the debate was speedy deleted, CSD-A3. ➨ ЯEDVERS 10:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC) Empty article, no clues as to notability...
Click to read more »no reason why the article creator's removal of the CSD should prolong this, so have replaced the CSD. AllyD (talk) 08:32, 13 November 2016 (UTC)) The above...
Click to read more »clearly Wiktionary entry Stephenb (Talk) 07:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC) CSD added - As per CSD A5. asenine t/c\r (fc: f2abr04) 16:05, 29 April 2008 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »(I swear it wasn't there when I started!) And I didn't know there was a CSD for non English. Will have to go back to page and reread!-- 🍺 Antiqueight...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Giantflightlessbirds...
Click to read more »- cv + CSD) Jiro Ono (d - bio) Josh Poole (d - blp + CSD) The savior of the Wyoming women (d - exists) Kim Williams (songwriter) (d - cv + CSD) The Triple...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G3 and WP:CSD#A10. Bbb23 (talk) 16:48, 22 June 2014 (UTC) The Bailiwick of Portwood...
Click to read more »August 2015 (UTC) Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address...
Click to read more »(View log) See WP:NOTABILITY, and WP:CSD#A7 Imperat§ r(Talk) 14:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete - CSD a7(web), Non-notable website http://www...
Click to read more »intend on starting to help out with WP:NPP, and would deal with the various CSD tags (particularly copyvios) that get placed on the pages. While it might...
Click to read more »meet a speedy deletion criteria. In particular I plan to help out more in CSD clean up and page move requests which require the assistance of an admin...
Click to read more »to this section. The result of the discussion was Speedily deleted per WP:CSD#U1 by Xaosflux. Thryduulf (talk) 16:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC) User:IN/redwarnConfig...
Click to read more »01:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Delete per my own nomination. Old version was WP:CSD#G12; current version's WP:PROD contested. Not only fails notability under...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this page. The result was deleted (CSD G4) by Kurt Shaped Box. NAC. Cliff smith talk 23:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »many "crappy myspace bands", but tagged as CSD:G1 is incorrect, because it should technically be tagged as CSD A7 with {{db-band}}. However, since the article...
Click to read more »August 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete, CSD A7, as per above. wikipediatrix 03:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete - CSD A7. Tagged as such. As for the products...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Speedy Delete per CSD G11, CSD A1, and CSD A7.--TBCΦtalk? 18:51, 29 October 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete per CSD A1/A3, lack of content/context...
Click to read more »Delete I agree that CSD A7 applies to this. --sumnjim talk with me·changes 15:14, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete, violates CSD A7. Realkyhick 17:51...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. The page was deleted...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VApoliticks (talk)...
Click to read more »06:47, 14 May 2017 (UTC) DELETED AS MEETING WP:CSD#A7 and if squinted and held your head just right, WP:CSD#G11Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:10, 14 May 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »January 2015 (UTC) Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address...
Click to read more »re-creation of already deleted material, see WP:CSD#G4. — Moe ε 16:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete as CSD G4. •Clyde• (a.k.a Mystytopia) 20:16, 5 June...
Click to read more »this page. The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G12 - article stated the story was copyrighted - also WP:CSD#G11 promotion. JohnCD (talk) 18:24, 1 December...
Click to read more »(UTC) Strong Delete. Unambiguous spam. Shouldn't the CSD templates been replaced with {{hangon}} and CSD deleter notified?? --Quartermaster (talk) 15:42,...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy Delete per CSD G5. It's a page created by a blocked user, who was already blocked for socking. I'd also put a CSD nomination right on the...
Click to read more »hindsight, the article wasn't a CSD candidate by a narrow margin (though I do think single-sentence+link articles should be CSDs, but that's a discussion for...
Click to read more »take part in? A: From the get-go I would like to close move requests, and CSD and XFD nominations. After getting comfortable with the tools in these areas...
Click to read more »company, and a WP:NEO. After it was tagged for CSD, the page creator trimmed down the spam (and the CSD tag) and left the neologism. Rather than duke it...
Click to read more »restoration by request because it was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#G11. Also, the requester has not provided a valid rationale for restoration;...
Click to read more »deletion is set out at the WP:CSD. Any editor may request speedy deletion where an article is in one of the narrow CSD categories. This done by adding...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7. (non-admin closure) Mr. Magoo (talk) 19:50, 31 August 2016 (UTC) Hussein...
Click to read more »meet the CSD criteria. An administrator enjoys the benefit of having this work already done, and must instead compare the article against the CSD criteria...
Click to read more »Report twice. On WT:CSD, a discussion is going on as to whether pages tagged with {{promising draft}} should be exempted from CSD G13 (for abandoned drafts)...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G3 and WP:CSD#A7 (although I found no evidence the person existed). Bbb23 (talk)...
Click to read more »and WP:GNG. Hitro talk 08:32, 15 November 2017 (UTC) Delete, borderline CSD A7. Only "reference" is to a streaming site. No information in the article...
Click to read more »strong enough understanding of the relevant policies and guidelines to handle CSD and PROD requests. The tools will also help with things like complicated...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. LouiseBrown1981 (talk) 16:12...
Click to read more »- per nom.(WP:CSD#G11) -=Elfin=-341 01:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC) The nom says it was tagged as such and removed; for future reference, CSD tags are not PRODs...
Click to read more »Procedural nomination as declined CSD: I don't have any particular view on this AfD. The main concern noted in the CSD nomination was notability, per the...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result of the debate was speedy deleted as per WP:CSD clause A7. Hall Monitor 20:02, 23 August 2005 (UTC) This article is about...
Click to read more »the WP:COMP deletion tagging workflow. Reverted my removal of an invalid CSD R2 for What wp is not [5] Got involved in the Davfs2 AfD [6] Modified...
Click to read more »These changes should only be made after consensus has been achieved at WT:CSD or some other similarly trafficked page. Update Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy...
Click to read more »18:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Speedy Delete due to WP:CSD#G10 against Stargate school if it's fake or WP:CSD#A7 if it's just some amateur movie. - Pious7 18:28...
Click to read more »PROD I decided that tagging with a CSD template would be wrong, but I believe it definitely still fits under CSD A7. Speedy delete. ~a (user • talk •...
Click to read more »nominated WP:CSD#A7 by JJPMaster. It passes the A7 requirement, so I removed the CSD and sent it to AFD. JPPMaster added the following note to the CSD: Also...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete per WP:COPYVIO (CSD#G12). PeterSymonds (talk) 09:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC) Norman J. Anderson (edit |...
Click to read more »(talk) 02:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Delete but I've also added a CSD template, per CSD A3. <3 bunny 02:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »stuff fails WP:GNG. It should be speedy deleted instead, as per CSD#G11 combined with CSD#A7. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 22:48, 1 May 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:BIO and WP:COI, author removed CSD/A7 tag, but there is some assertion of notability so here we are. EliminatorJR...
Click to read more »page. The result was Speedy Delete for multiple reasons (WP:CSD#A7, WP:CSD#G11 and WP:CSD#G12) by Jimfbleak. (non-admin closure) Anupmehra -Let's talk...
Click to read more »and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Astrosquid...
Click to read more »Jinkinson talk to me 17:43, 16 October 2014 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7 (unremarkable person). Jinkinson talk to me 17:44, 16 October 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dberks (talk) 15:17...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy deletion under CSD G3, A1 - Vianello (Talk) 14:51, 15 May 2013 (UTC) Milinocus Incident in Kansas...
Click to read more »was speedy delete. Article fails WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#G11 (no indication of importance, and overly promotional). CSD template removal was invalid because...
Click to read more »TheMagikCow (T) (C) 18:15, 25 May 2017 (UTC) But there is WP:CSD#a7 (organized event) and WP:CSD#G11. If those don't fly, Delete as not meeting WP:GNG after...
Click to read more »2007 (GMT). This may well be a CSD:G10, if one can consider deity's being subject to attack. This would be a classic CSD:T1 if it was in true template...
Click to read more »plan to specifically work with WP:CSD using the Delete tool to delete pages that are obvious violations of the CSD criteria. I feel I am somewhat limited...
Click to read more »number of new or changed speedy deletion criteria, each previously part of WP:CSD#G6: G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing...
Click to read more »of expertise admin-wise is probably CSD which they frequent with discussion and already decltype helps with CAT:CSD by removing incorrect speedy tags....
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete in accordance with WP:CSD#A7. Acalamari 22:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC) Fresh Crush Crew (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »of notability that were in the article that would disqualify it from WP:CSD#A7. You might want to request him to WP:USERFY the article to your user space...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Speedy Delete per CSD A3 (attempt to contact), CSD A7, and CSD G11. Xoloz 18:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC) Stand and Deliver...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete (per WP:CSD#G4) and WP:SALT Thryduulf (talk) 16:45, 15 June 2009 (UTC) AfDs for this...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result of the debate was speedy delete per WP:CSD#P1/WP:CSD#A3, no content. Two and a half months is more than enough time for this...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep since your nomination is in batch after they are all declined at CSD, I think my comment applies here too. Vice Chancellors are notable asdemics...
Click to read more »information for the user to do anything with it. I submitted this to CSD but the CSD was denied and it was suggested that it be submitted through AFD instead...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:AUTOBIO of non-notable WP:FILMMAKER. CSD removed repeatedly by author. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 03:28, 25 December 2014...
Click to read more »sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) CSD G11 removed. Article is WP:PROMOTION Whiteguru (talk) 22:10, 17 May 2022...
Click to read more »sub-category of CAT:CSD, which is supposed to be a centralized place for admins to check pages to be deleted. Splitting the CSD category just makes admins...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Page deleted via CSD A7 RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC) Lucky Gupta (edit |...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy deleted per WP:CSD#A7. Mr.Z-man 19:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC) AAAAA (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Whoop whoop pull...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#A11 Floquenbeam (talk) 17:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »this page. The result was Speedy delete. No suggestion of significance: WP:CSD#A7. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:29, 5 September 2013 (UTC) Sunil Kumar Pathela...
Click to read more »March 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete - I added the original CSD tag as it does qualify under WP:CSD#A7, as it makes no claim for the notability of this particular...
Click to read more »Cky2250 (talk) 12:25, 30 October 2013 (UTC) WP:CSD#G8? Keφr 08:07, 31 October 2013 (UTC) Or WP:CSD#G2 can be used up to you.Cky2250 (talk) 12:24, 31...
Click to read more »areas I am most familiar with as a non-admin, such as Articles for Deletion, CSD and AIV. Over time I would branch out into anywhere that had a backlog, starting...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete WP:CSD#A7, WP:CSD#G11, WP:CSD#G12 all applied. SmartSE (talk) 11:57, 11 November 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »opportunity for the copyvio to be recast as a nonviolative source page. CSD procedures should be separate and independent of the copyvio procedure as...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#A7 JohnCD (talk) 14:45, 14 June 2013 (UTC) Frank JD Lee (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TheMagnusOpus (talk)...
Click to read more »WP:CSD criteria for unambiguous WP:NOT violations.) —Tom Morris (talk) 13:53, 9 February 2012 (UTC) Delete per Tom's rationale. And I agree for a CSD for...
Click to read more »WP:CSD #11 so very, very hard. To top that all off, it even attacks Digg and Reddit (and Wikipedia) as well, making it WP:CSD #10 to boot. Two CSD violations...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 119.93.163.113 (talk)...
Click to read more »Bobanny 18:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC) Speedy Delete.. Potential canidate for CSD:A1 and CSD:A7.--Vox Rationis (Talk | contribs) 19:42, 3 March 2007 (UTC) Speedy...
Click to read more »such CSD. 07:57, August 4, 2005 Tags Henry C.K. Liu as "vanity". No such CSD. 09:28, August 6, 2005 Tags Crackington Haven as "advert". No such CSD. 13:22...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SchoolConfi (talk)...
Click to read more »and serving traffic to several Asian countries. [2]. Also this week: New CSD criterion — ArbCom election series — Esperanza — News and notes — Press coverage...
Click to read more »you wanted feedback on, I looked at your deleted contributions and your CSD tagging. If you only failed your first RfA because of this, you will have...
Click to read more »source: Version 1.0 Version 1.01 Fixing CSD errors, and not moving some CSDs Version 1.1 Fixing redirect Errors & CSD tagging Function overview: Will move...
Click to read more »Non-notable company and website, per CSD A7. Tckma (talk) 14:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC) Comment on history: Ironholds added a CSD A7 tag to the article, but the...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G4 and WP:CSD#G5 -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:35, 7 April 2015 (UTC) Sachin lokapure (edit |...
Click to read more »they think a CSD in undue. now consider the life cycle of an article An initial version is made. A challenge of WP:N is made at WP:CSD or WP:Afd The...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: Mass delete per CSD:G7 and G13. Alex ShihTalk 04:48, 5 July 2017 (UTC) Draft:Rudolf Schicketanz (edit...
Click to read more »rather CSD this than waste time at AfD, but what exactly can I do when someone other than the article creator, a non-admin, removes the first CSD template...
Click to read more »part in? A: At first, I'd like to get my feet wet by helping out at CAT:CSD and WP:AIAV. Although many admins hang around both, I'm always slightly surprised...
Click to read more »hope to take to GA and then FA. Sometimes I work in new page patrol and CSD. Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. NarangD (talk) 10:39, 17 October 2021 (UTC) Speedy delete CSD G7 author has requested deletion JW 1961 Talk 11:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:39, 27 April 2019 (UTC) Please review applicable CSD criteria, such as WP:CSD#G5 and WP:CSD#G11, before making similar nominations. --SmokeyJoe (talk)...
Click to read more »an obvious delete, but not a CSD. It is vanity (not a CSD) and nonsense, but not patent nonsense as defined by the CSD criteria. I would have speedied...
Click to read more »contributor removed CSD tag. Site fails WP:NOTE. Livitup (talk) 05:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete via WP:CSD#G11. I'm restoring the CSD tag and warning...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy Delete (CSD A1). Peacent 03:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC) The Return of The Glass Slipper (edit |...
Click to read more »Speedy delete - Speedy delete as WP:CSD#G1 patent nonsense. -- Spawn Man 06:34, 7 September 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete: CSD G3 definitely applies. Sephiroth...
Click to read more »process abuses. DMacks 05:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete under WP:CSD#G10 or WP:CSD#A7. It was already deleted a couple days ago because it was an attack...
Click to read more »not be possible if he were as famous as the article claims. I don't feel a CSD is the way to go about this, so I am proposing for AFD instead. Fbifriday...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was delete. Even if we don't apply WP:CSD#A7 here, it seems like notability is not met going by Djm-leighpark's comment...
Click to read more »undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Martha.Savage (talk)...
Click to read more »album by a band (Annotations Of An Autopsy) whose article was speedied under CSD A7, released by a small non-notable label. Neither the band nor the label...
Click to read more »page. The result was speedy deleted as blatant and obvious misinformation (CSD G3). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Sydney the Bowl Cut...
Click to read more »way to browse through userspace CSD logs. These logs can be used for various sorts of casual analysis (like which CSD criteria are being used frequently...
Click to read more »are created and maintained. To that end, my primary interest is working on CSD and Prod nominations. I also regularly monitor recent changes to existing...
Click to read more »while doing WP:CSD#F4 and WP:CSD#F11 deletions. I must have had CSD on the brain because I unintentionally deleted the article under WP:CSD#G11 rather than...
Click to read more »discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 14:33, 25 May 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete under WP:CSD G4, nothing has changed since previous AfD. Fails WP:ATHLETE due to never...
Click to read more »notability. If it were in article space, it might fall under WP:CSD#A3, WP:CSD#A1 or maybe even WP:CSD#G3. Keφr 10:22, 28 September 2013 (UTC) Delete - Looks like...
Click to read more »Textbook WP:CSD#G11. Advertising a trading business, no third party reliable sources. Miles from the boundaries of G11. Consider applicable CSD criteria...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G11 and WP:CSD#A7 §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:23, 19 August 2015 (UTC) Eric Brown-Bey...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) Hoax. Recommend CSD instead of AfD. Thanks. HG | Talk 06:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC) Delete - was about to CSD it myself but I checked...
Click to read more »request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. KingPrice (talk)...
Click to read more »fits CSD A7 when it does not indicate why the subject is important. There is no indication of such sort in the article, so I think it fits well CSD A7....
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy delete as per new CSD criterion: no assertion of notability. --khaosworks 16:59, July 23, 2005 (UTC) The new CSD does not apply to companies...
Click to read more »This is a case where the CSD should still be used, and a warning placed on the author's page regarding the removal of the CSD tag. RickinBaltimore (talk)...
Click to read more »article I originally took to wp:CSD#G3 and was undone by an account that was created moments after I tagged it for csd. So I am taking it to AFD for further...
Click to read more »deletion have suffered from the CSD backlog and would like to see it cleaned out. I once tagged four articles for CSD and it wasn't until four days later...
Click to read more »tagged it for WP:CSD#A1. Was this tag appropriate? If so, why? If not, why not? Vanamonde (talk) 17:56, 10 April 2017 (UTC) A: Per WP:CSD, "Consensus has...
Click to read more »vandals, for example here. Looking at your deleted contributions I saw few CSD tags including this Complicity (album) which in March you tagged as no context...
Click to read more »cover a wide range of topics. I will participate regularly in WP:AFD, WP:CSD, and others. While I'm not patrolling the pages of Wikipedia, I will most...
Click to read more »16:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC) Nope. You are advised to review WP:CSD. I would quote CSD#A1 if you are concerned about, it says, Articles lacking sufficient...
Click to read more »clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful. Technical news The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Deleted under WP:CSD#G7. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:10, 30 January 2011 (UTC) 2011 Malaysian Murdering...
Click to read more »clean-up articles Assuming they are good, and don't need to see AFD, PROD, or CSD.... Most of these simply need a reference section, with a few references...
Click to read more »September 2015 (UTC) Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address...
Click to read more »June 2015 (UTC) Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request and moved to Draft:Emporium Melbourne...
Click to read more »Unsourced, no indication of notability. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 00:49, 27 January 2016 (UTC) Keep This is a perfectly good article...
Click to read more »example; I’m often overruled for being too hasty, and that’s OK, the beauty of CSD is that it’s a two-peson process, tagger and deleter) I wouldn't dive headlong...
Click to read more »applies to pages that meet at least one of the criteria for speedy deletion (CSD), which specify the only cases in which administrators have broad consensus...
Click to read more »Possibly CSD G5 U11 violation. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 08:29, 30 August 2017 (UTC) Delete. A non-contributor advertising his YouTube channel. WP:CSD#U5 and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia criteria. The reasoning in this essay is not applicable to Wikipedia:Speedy deletion (CSD) nominations which are meant to be made quickly....
Click to read more »result was delete. This one's a "hat trick". Per consensus, per CSD A7, and per CSD G12 as the first paragraph is a close paraphrase of http://www.nanobiotix...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A CSD that contested by the creator Sanjit2012. The company fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP...
Click to read more »mammolasty but a mastoplasty. Breast obsession. I have listed a lot of others a CSD but is this plasible_ I think it is but it is a bit of a breas obsession...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This came up as csd candidate and grounds the article was previously deleted, however a look...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete per CSD A7 and CSD A3. --Coredesat 07:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC) Non-notable local band...
Click to read more »23:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Speedy Delete CSD A10 as duplicate of Multimeter. In addition, frankly qualifies for CSD G3 as a Google search on the term returns...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was CSD. Copyvio, CSD template added. (non-admin closure) » Shadowowl | talk 11:07, 14 September...
Click to read more »20 June 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7 and renominated as such. Also warned the IP for removing the CSD template. --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 00:49, 20...
Click to read more »delete per CSD A7 An under-12 futsal team! Nowhere near notable. -- Mattinbgn/ talk 11:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete so tagged. CSD A7 without a...
Click to read more »make sure it is not going to block the CSD) — Relyimah (t-c-e) 21:28, 23 June 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete WP:CSD#A7. I have changed the db tag to db-person...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was speedy deleted by Anthony Appleyard, CSD A3: Article has no meaningful, substantive content. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:11...
Click to read more »there a CSD for this kind of thing?) -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 13:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC) Snow Delete -- This doesn't fall under R3(?) for CSD; how...
Click to read more »