Redirect to:
Avoid instruction creep to keep Wikipedia policy and guideline pages easy to understand. The longer, more detailed, and more complicated you make the...
Click to read more »Article creep occurs when a series of reasonable step-by-step edits are made, but the end product is undesirable. An editor should look at a page globally...
Click to read more »Template creep, also known as creeping templatitis, is the tendency for some Wikipedia articles (and talk pages) to become gradually cluttered with templates...
Click to read more »editor's views are all (s)he spews and the shit gets deep it's called POV creep. Burma-shave One of the most important core content polices of Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Functionality creep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Already exists in far greater detail at creeping featurism....
Click to read more »Scope creep (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...
Click to read more »The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC) The Creep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »result was delete. Addhoc (talk) 21:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC) Wireless creep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:16, 20 September 2007 (UTC) The Creep (Comics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »Scope creep (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...
Click to read more »this page. The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 22:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC) Creep (custom) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »definition. However, having done that, what I now have is three meanings for "creeping crud." Well, the first meaning I know is correct, and is vouched for by...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. Michig (talk) 19:39, 16 December 2012 (UTC) Creep Clash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »Status: Approved Requesting user: Scope creep (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Resource link and...
Click to read more »Guide to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Creep (Radiohead song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »did a Google search and did find one non-mirror reference to "Cybernetic Creep". It was from a horror.com forum: "the cybernetic soildiers grew nearer...
Click to read more »Delete, patent nonsense. Guy (Help!) 12:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC) Dice Creep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »page. The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 22:54, 15 April 2011 (UTC) Creep (Internet) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom. Also created article under Creep Tonite Tazz765 19:12, 31 October 2006 (UTC) Creep Tonite has been zapped as db-afd Tubezone 19:34...
Click to read more »result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 07:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC) Porn creep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »page. The result was delete. Wifione Message 06:42, 16 March 2012 (UTC) Creeping fascism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »Reddit creep: The debt that Wikipedia owes sites like Reddit or Google often goes unacknowledged around here. If the purpose of Wikipedia is to bring...
Click to read more »rule pages short and simple or else people won't read them. Keep the number of rules small, or people might not join Wikipedia. Avoid instruction creep...
Click to read more »deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Cousin Creep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »page. The result was Delete. — Coren (talk) 04:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Creep (Warcraft) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »Beware of instruction creep Also called instructionitis, instruction creep is the tendency of instructions to grow and grow, until they become so long...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Policy fallacy Wikipedia:Randy in Boise Meta:Don't be a jerk Meta:Instruction creep (superior in several ways to Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep)...
Click to read more »simple Wikipedia:Don't stuff beans up your nose Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep Wikipedia:Consensus doesn't have to change Wikipedia:Cosmetic edit For bots...
Click to read more »prompt work. In that case, I shall post. scope_creep (talk) 13:20, 9 March 2018 (UTC) Thanks @scope_creep I'm very much new to Wiki, but I'll learn new...
Click to read more »you have to meet. Worst of all, with too many navboxes piled up, template creep can start to set in. And before you know it, the article is suddenly more...
Click to read more »Beware of instruction creep Also called instructionitis, instruction creep is the tendency for instructions to grow and grow, until they become so long...
Click to read more »of LSI, Chairman of LRI. Current refs don't point to valid sites. scope_creep (talk) 12:08, 15 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »this is creep (and cite actual parts of the creep guidelines and how this violates it)? So far no one has done that, they simply say it is creep, yet they...
Click to read more »speedy renomination. On closer inspection, the three sources found by Scope_creep might be significant coverage for ASCII-based phonetic scripts, but it seems...
Click to read more »considered negatively"): Wikipedia:Article creep Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep Wikipedia:Avoid template creep This page is a list of project pages associated...
Click to read more »hard-and-fast definition for consensus This is nothing but instruction creep To respond to the first argument, this is not even a hard-and-fast definition...
Click to read more »Beware of instruction creep Also called instructionitis, instruction creep is the tendency for instructions to grow and grow, until they become so long...
Click to read more »CreepMentis (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...
Click to read more »Consensus, Be Bold, the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle, avoid instruction creep, the snowball clause, What Wikipedia is not, and similar. This page is not...
Click to read more »User:Zigzig20s. Please take this into account. scope_creep (talk) 13:08, 11 February 2018 (UTC) User:Scope creep: Would you like to withdraw your nomination please...
Click to read more »Instruction creep is an especially serious problem with Wikipedia's Manual of Style ("MOS"). This page contains the thoughts of some of Wikipedia's most...
Click to read more »Beware of instruction creep Also called instructionitis, instruction creep is the tendency for instructions to grow and grow, until they become so long...
Click to read more »WP:CLUTTER may refer to: WP:LEADCLUTTER Wikipedia:Avoid template creep Wikipedia:Citation overkill Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trivia sections) MOS:UNLINKDATES...
Click to read more »scope_creep (talk) 12:37, 21 October 2017 (UTC) Gbooks has about 10 books written by him, and they are still sold on Weathespoons and Amazon. scope_creep (talk)...
Click to read more »out the 40 refs are primary sources. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:ORGIND. scope_creep (talk) 11:59, 10 November 2018 (UTC) I'm not arguing for keep, but telling...
Click to read more »vice president of manufacturing scope_creep (talk) 00:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator scope_creep (talk) 01:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »scope_creep (talk) 21:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC) It is worth noting that the whole article has been created by a whole bunch of SPA accounts. scope_creep (talk)...
Click to read more »another. Templates created for every subject would go against template creep which clutters articles when templates for the broader subject can do the...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was keep. (non-admin closure) scope_creep (talk) 09:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...
Click to read more »WP:NBASKETBALL. Third tier league player. scope_creep (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC) Comment @Scope creep: WP:NBASKETBALL you mean. — Sam Sailor 01:59...
Click to read more » The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) scope_creep (talk) 12:56, 27 January 2018 (UTC) Rachel Grant (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »we wanted a new article. If it isn't new, you could still potentially nominate when it gets promoted to a good article. Did You Know instruction creep...
Click to read more »premature, but understand the depth of feeling.scope_creep (talk) 16:13, 20 February 2018 (UTC) @Scope creep: Does doing a little bit of training qualify you...
Click to read more »However, there is a number of problems with it. scope_creep (talk) 15:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC) Scope creep, you are probably going to have to explain what you...
Click to read more »consent when drafting new policy pages. To lessen the chance of instruction creep, a policy or a guideline proposal must be exposed to, and discussed by,...
Click to read more »gestalt. Generally soft advice belongs in an essay, thus avoiding instruction creep in Wikipedia's official protocols. There are over 2,000 essays on a wide...
Click to read more »long dead royal house. Fails WP:BIO. Possibly notable via the UNHCR. scope_creepTalk 20:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »scope_creep (talk) 16:06, 4 September 2018 (UTC) Is the first reference insufficient to save it, from the University of Chicago Press, scope_creep (talk)...
Click to read more »written like an IPO summary. Highly promotional. Fails WP:ORGIND. scope_creep (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »non-notable. Perhaps it is a case of WP:TOOSOON. scope_creepTalk 10:36, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Scope_creep, how are the starring roles in two internationally...
Click to read more »speedy keep. Out-of-process disruptive nomination. See WP:ANI#User:Scope_creep_Revenge_and_disruptive_editing (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib)...
Click to read more »BEANS. Special:PrefixIndex/Wikipedia:Don't Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point Wikipedia:Don't...
Click to read more »period between stating concerns and nominating the article is instruction creep. There were 10 new admins, 3 new featured articles, 1 new featured list...
Click to read more »userspace if you wish. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 19 February 2012 (UTC) CreepTD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »The Bushranger One ping only 05:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC) Slapstick (Creeped Out) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »really about him. No secondary referencing. scope_creepTalk 20:32, 19 October 2021 (UTC) @Scope creep I argued that a portion of sources are highly-reliable...
Click to read more »Oppose Oppose. This entire set of proposals constitutes massive instruction creep. Let's use common sense instead of applying legalism. -- Seth Ilys 02:10...
Click to read more »Japanese representative for L'oreal from September 2003 to August 2005. scope_creepTalk 11:59, 15 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »herself and the last one is not about her. scope_creepTalk 08:52, 26 February 2022 (UTC) @Scope creep, the last one isn't about her, but is used to back...
Click to read more »servers that will do dot plots. Wnt (talk) 14:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC) Zoom creep is an effect in zoom lenses for cameras, exhibited when gravity causes movement...
Click to read more »negligible, and perhaps a case of WP:TOOSOON. scope_creep (talk) 11:24, 18 November 2018 (UTC) scope_creep (talk) 11:25, 18 November 2018 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »policy proposal because it would keep our processes simple. Instruction creep is a bugbear to be avoided, and this simple proposal would not adversely...
Click to read more »information creep with random one-sentence additions. "Acting career" subheader entirely unsourced. "Personal life" is also subject to one-sentence creep. "Discography"...
Click to read more »don't see. Not really instruction creep, just "confusion creep". Xoloz 01:40, 2 December 2005 (UTC) Delete Confusion creep is annoying. Ashibaka (tock) 04:04...
Click to read more »author, new book series. Does not satisfy any criteria of notability scope_creep 01:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC) Delete -- I already had this tagged for deletion...
Click to read more »in this dispute DovidBenAvraham (talk · contribs) – filing party scope_creep (talk · contribs) JohnInDC (talk · contribs) Articles affected by this dispute...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NACTOR. No effective sourcing. scope_creepTalk 08:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »and WP:SIRS. Routine business, funding news, PR and press-releases. scope_creepTalk 09:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more » The result was keep. Nomination Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk 08:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Charles...
Click to read more »logs) – uploaded by Scope creep (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). I plan to update it as fair use. scope_creep (talk) 09:42, 9 September 2018...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Generic payday loan company. Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creepTalk 14:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »Radiant_>|< 14:04, August 19, 2005 (UTC) Page is just more needless instruction creep 152.163.100.71 04:15, 13 August 2005 (UTC) Keep. Might be useful, might...
Click to read more »you completely correct Wikipedia of some typo today, the same typo will creep back in with time. "Typo adoption" is a defense against that by encouraging...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL scope_creep (talk) 19:48, 6 May 2017 (UTC) Delete - per nom. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Fails...
Click to read more »WP:NCORP standard. Absolute advertising that asserts WP:NOTADVERTISING. scope_creep (talk) 08:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »but at this time, article is an advertising article for a hotel. scope_creep (talk) 20:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »Party and not been elected hence he is not notable. Fails WP:BIO scope_creep (talk) 00:01, 12 March 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC) *Delete Dead refs. Fails WP:BIO scope_creep (talk) 00:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »as seat was won by Vice Mayor: Teresa O'Neill. No longer notable. scope_creep (talk) 23:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC) Keep - Notability is not temporary...
Click to read more »continual spammy updates since 2007. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORG. scope_creep (talk) 16:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC) Comment: Without debating the merits...
Click to read more »not designed to meet a specific need, would be an example of instruction creep (see image on right), and should not be created at all. Additional notability...
Click to read more »the Main Page 2 Errors 3 Debatable rules 4 Overlooked rules 5 Instruction creep 6 Daily headings on the suggestions page 7 Recognition 8 History of Did...
Click to read more »particular consensus established? Of course, consensus can and does change, but it doesn't have to change. If it ain't broke Avoid instruction creep...
Click to read more »evidence that the subject is a full professor. (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk 12:25, 6 November 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »additional sources, established notability. Clear keep (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk 11:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »very poor quality article on a sportsman. scope_creepTalk 21:47, 25 April 2021 (UTC) Comment scope_creep much like this article on a pond. StickyWicket...
Click to read more »are routine funding news. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND, WP:SIRS. scope_creepTalk 08:48, 23 July 2022 (UTC) Delete That's precisely what I said when I...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Asshole John rule Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep Wikipedia:MOSBLOAT Meta:Instruction creep Kollin, Zoltan. "Myth #1: People read on the web"....
Click to read more »speedy keep. Out-of-process disruptive nomination. See WP:ANI#User:Scope_creep_Revenge_and_disruptive_editing (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib)...
Click to read more »CreepMentis (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...
Click to read more »WP:CRYSTALBALL. Also film is non-notable by definition (or lack of). Scope creep 22:51, 24 July 2014 (UTC) Note: Actually, and to be clear... WP:CRYSTALBALL...
Click to read more »external links, mention man by name, provide no other information. scope_creep (talk) 22:02, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »Forbes coverage is either 404 or contributors. No secondary coverage scope_creepTalk 00:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »organizations in the Americas alone. scope_creep talk 16:07, 24 August 2014 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator Sorry. scope_creep talk 19:59, 24 August 2014 (UTC) Wrong...
Click to read more »related pages because they are dependent on this article's notability: Creeping In My Soul - EP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »and MjolnirPants, and ArbCom reminded itself to exercise care about scope creep when taking up future cases. The Rambling Man case closed on 13 October...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was keep. (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk 02:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »Nomination withdrawn. Article was Speedy Deleted (non-admin closure) scope_creep (talk) 10:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) BLP Article which fails WP:BIO. Zero notability. scope_creep (talk) 01:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »evidence for the newspaper. Not listed at: http://naiindia.com/mi.html scope_creep (talk) 15:56, 14 June 2017 (UTC) Keep, unless there is other deletion criteria...
Click to read more »speedy keep. Out-of-process disruptive nomination. See WP:ANI#User:Scope_creep_Revenge_and_disruptive_editing (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Strong Keep Effective head of Pers Z S for much world war 2. scope_creepTalk 08:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC) Does Pers Z S satisfy WP:SOLDIER 5? Mztourist...
Click to read more »scope_creepTalk 10:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC) @Tyw7: I guess your not watching it either. scope_creepTalk 10:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC) Scope creep, well...
Click to read more »is an invalid source as it is user generated, as is mydramalist. scope_creep (talk) 12:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC) Questions: which policy or guidelines...
Click to read more »single series. Can't see how he is notable. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG scope_creep (talk) 23:56, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »folk forget about them. They are transitory. scope_creepTalk 15:10, 17 December 2022 (UTC) Scope creep, There is WP:NODEADLINE for creating articles, and...
Click to read more »malicious by the user – in some cases a user's personal opinions might creep through into their edits more than average. Consider, for example, an editor...
Click to read more »There is no delete rationale on this page, and it cant be updated. scope_creep (talk) 08:46, 19 October 2018 (UTC) Delete Let's go through WP:ACADEMIC...
Click to read more »of suitable references. Two current references don't mention him. scope_creep (talk) 21:39, 14 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »with quality references and viewpoints Monitor articles in scope for POV creep Eliminate content problems from discrimination articles Scope Articles about...
Click to read more » The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) scope_creep (talk) 11:49, 7 March 2018 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Fawzia...
Click to read more »playing for 7 years. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Never took off. scope_creep (talk) 09:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Non-notable band. No coverage, no fans. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 09:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »Encyclopedia of Korean Culture makes eminently notable. (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk 08:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »stating the independent discovery with refs. (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk 08:09, 22 May 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »deleted by Nick, who was the author. // PTO 23:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC) WP:CREEP, WP:BEANS and allready covered under WP:UCS. This is blowing a minor problem...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable real estate developer. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 12:21, 5 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »brochure article. More of information note. Unsuitable for wikipedia. scope_creepTalk 11:44, 2 February 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »Nothing on Soundcloud, Spotify or Apple music. scope_creepTalk 08:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC) scope_creep As a response for your "barely any coverage" comment...
Click to read more »known much outside YouTube. Barely any coverage as far as I can see. scope_creep (talk) 17:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP scope_creepTalk 02:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »due to John Oates and Daft Punk. No secondary sources outwith that. scope_creepTalk 18:49, 18 September 2021 (UTC) Keep This is sufficient coverage under...
Click to read more »Records' co-founder Antonio "L.A." Reid "flipped out" when he first heard "Creep"), I am not certain about the use of the "flipped out" quote as it is not...
Click to read more »Gooden, an architect who own's his own firm. Seems to fail WP:BIO. scope_creep talk 218:01 24 July 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Notable but zero reference on a new BLP article. scope_creep (talk) 19:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC) CommentDelete - Article has near-zero...
Click to read more »result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 16:27, 13 August 2011 (UTC) The Creeping Fog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »WP:TOOSOON. Minor actor at the moment, but early days. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 12:19, 20 January 2017 (UTC) Comment. I fixed the formatting of this...
Click to read more »WP:BIO. Nothing to assert notability. Refs are all trade papers. scope_creep (talk) 00:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC) Delete as clear webhost advertising...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. No real coverage. scope_creepTalk 11:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »and then did it again, and now it's starting to creep back up, with the same content!. scope_creep (talk) 12:31, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Delete Per above...
Click to read more »search. Most links are blogs but with some coverage. Could be notable? scope_creep (talk) 17:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »Creep is preventing the article from being improved as well as the claims of notability. I am not sure what’s going on here but it seems Scope Creep is...
Click to read more »there is a clear case of WP:NEXIST scope_creepTalk 06:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Delete: If User:scope_creep wants to write an article on this subject...
Click to read more »scope_creep (talk) 20:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC) Comment This is the document it comes from: [4]. It clearly states it is distributed free. scope_creep (talk)...
Click to read more »minor appearances but not enough to satisfy WP:NACTOR not WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 23:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »anything to find valid sources. scope_creep (talk) 14:36, 27 July 2017 (UTC) I know exactly what it is, Scope creep, but there are half a a dozen other...
Click to read more »to take to GA once this is finished. Thanks. scope_creepTalk 13:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC) Hi scope creep, what an interesting article. I would suggest that...
Click to read more »enough to supply notability for BLP. Fails WP:BIO. Could be wrong? scope_creep (talk) 21:48, 30 March 2017 (UTC) Delete The sources come no where close...
Click to read more »h-index. Fails WP:NPROF, WP:SIGCOV. Very slim claim to notability. scope_creepTalk 23:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC) Weak Delete I got this far but was unable...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BAND. Failure to launch scenario. scope_creepTalk 09:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »I'm not doing anymore, they are all junk. scope_creepTalk 11:13, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Comment: Scope Creep, please avoid getting emotional as that can interfere...
Click to read more »Churnalism and routine press coverage. Fails WP:ORGIND, WP:SIGCOV scope_creep (talk) 08:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC) Keep per substantial coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »Group A, B Cscope_creep (talk) 19:05, 2 August 2017 (UTC) This is info only. scope_creep (talk) 23:06, 2 August 2017 (UTC) @Scope creep: Now there is a...
Click to read more »talk:Salimfadhley" }, { "title": "User talk:Scope creep" }, { "title": "User talk:Sdrqaz" }...
Click to read more »acronymn FFCM mean? Its regarding the articles for Mary Sheridan. Thanks scope_creep (talk) 00:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC) Fellow of the Faculty of Community Medicine...
Click to read more »start of World War II.Apart from that, I don't know much at all. scope_creepTalk 16:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC) There is a Deutsch-Amerikanische Petroleum...
Click to read more »don't understand where Template Creep applies—there's but a single template on the page, and the "Avoid template creep" essay is about "the tendency for...
Click to read more »scope_creep (talk) 19:01, 10 June 2018 (UTC) Executive producer notability rational is false, as he is not listed on casting list. scope_creep (talk)...
Click to read more »what man does, as opposed to man himself. scope_creep (talk) 12:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC) scope_creep (talk) 12:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »to creator to apply ref's about month ago, but so far no results. scope_creep (talk) 23:28, 26 January 2017 (UTC) Delete as entirely unsourced and then...
Click to read more »as first reference is link to book on Amazon and this passed Afc. scope_creepTalk 22:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »off historical value, and worth keeping. scope_creep (talk) 10:09, 5 September 2017 (UTC) @Scope creep: Saying that the article possesses "historical...
Click to read more »you need a per ref analysis, please ping me. scope_creepTalk 15:27, 11 December 2022 (UTC) @Scope creep thank you for your job. 多少 战场 龙 (talk) 06:57, 14...
Click to read more »releases, duplicate refs and dead links. There is some coverage. scope_creepTalk 17:40, 21 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »Afc. It is so heavily promotional. Passed WP:TNT. Blow it up now. scope_creep (talk) 13:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC) Comment The Afc entry was tiny, it was...
Click to read more »result was keep. Additional reference discovered. (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk 18:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable lawyer. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 22:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Scope creep's source analysis has not been rebutted. Sandstein 10:32, 12 January 2020...
Click to read more »WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. Entirely non-notable. scope_creepTalk 19:54, 16 December 2019 (UTC) @Scope creep:I have not provided any sources that are press releases...
Click to read more »she is not even on the main cast list. Probably a young actress. scope_creep 14:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list...
Click to read more »WP:OR. Utter codswallop. scope_creep talk 20:43, 13 October 2013 (UTC) Delete Per WP:GNG Also, bonus points to scope_creep for use of the word "codswallop...
Click to read more »so fails WP:GNG. Also uses bare URLS which will never get fixed. scope_creep talk 20:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC) Delete per nom - Promo bollox that belongs...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Simply not notable.Fails WP:BIO and WP:MUSICBIO. scope_creep (talk) 22:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC) Delete does not pass our GNG Burley22 (talk)...
Click to read more »read the following: Connected Coi. Thanks. scope_creep (talk) 06:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC) Hi scope_creep. I have done this, thanks. I still do not mind...
Click to read more »TWL) Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:SIRS. scope_creepTalk 09:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC) scope_creep, can you elaborate why the coverage cited in the article...
Click to read more »Shoal Loa scope_creep (talk) 18:31, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Weak Delete Can't find any sources on this, or other two articles. scope_creep (talk) 18:34,...
Click to read more »WP:NCORP, WP:ORGIND and WP:SIGCOV. References are mix of churnalism. scope_creep (talk) 18:11, 27 October 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »from agencies in different countries. scope_creep (talk) 11:58, 3 November 2018 (UTC) Comment user:Scope creep] Where are you seeing these obits? They're...
Click to read more »deadline – essay about preserving cultural heritage Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep – essay about overlong instruction pages Wikipedia:Wikipedia is a work in...
Click to read more »Then the whining know-it-all, self-satisfied And shining morning face, creeping like snail Unwillingly to ANI. And then the lover, Sighing like furnace...
Click to read more »of puff or advertising. Excellent wee artice. Well worth keeping. scope_creep (talk) 12:13, 14 June 2018 (UTC) Hmm.....I quite appreciate your arguments...
Click to read more »2018 (UTC) Delete Routine coverage for startup. Fails WP:ORGIND. scope_creep (talk) 21:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC) Delete - Not notable. Acnetj (talk) 22:01...
Click to read more »instruction creep. But it is important to distinguish instruction creep from documentation of that instruction creep. Instruction creep is bad because...
Click to read more »→ Her pretty feet Like snails did creep A little out, and then, As if they played at bo-peep Did soon draw in agen....
Click to read more »valid sources could be a good article, but at the moment fails WP:BIO scope_creep (talk) 22:24, 16 December 2016 (UTC) Keep. I removed the WP:BLPPROD tag...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion/Proposal. Instances of instruction creep, of which this is one, should be resisted. vote – discuss This proposal...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Paid article. WP:PROMO. scope_creep (talk) 12:38, 2 February 2018 (UTC) Delete according to the WP:PROMO policy...
Click to read more »Refs are passing mentions, PR, event listing, catalogue entries. scope_creepTalk 23:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC) Delete Agree totally with nom. Best Alexandermcnabb...
Click to read more »previously deleted at Afd and rejected at Afc. Highly promotional. scope_creepTalk 04:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »scope_creepTalk 07:57, 20 June 2022 (UTC) Delete based on no other citations that can be found. If she did win an award per what scope_creep says, that...
Click to read more »Strong Keep Clearly notable. Passes WP:GNG. scope_creep (talk) 00:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC) @Scope creep: Please provide reliable sources that show it passes...
Click to read more »references quite poor. Currently fails WP:SIGCOV. Potentially notable. scope_creepTalk 13:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC) Accomplished individual with a rich list of...
Click to read more »fails WP:GNG Completely non notable. scope_creep 19:00, 3 August 2014 (UTC) Withdrawn by Nominator scope_creep talk 18:49 30 August 2014 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »WP:CORPDEPTH. Refs are mix of blogs and press releases. Potentially notable. scope_creepTalk 19:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »→ We shall creep out quietly into the butler's pantry— —with out pistols and swords and sticks— —and rush in upon them, —and whack 'em, and whack 'em...
Click to read more »secondary source. Described as a comedian 6 years ago. Fails WP:BIO scope_creepTalk 08:42, 17 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »away from Wikipedia rather than keep them. Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep Wikipedia:Product, process, policy Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention...
Click to read more »licensed. scope_creep talk 19:06, 3 August 2014 (UTC) Moving to Merge into SMPTE ST2071 article, which is becoming an accepted standard. scope_creep talk 12:34...
Click to read more »Wikiquote has quotations related to Rules. Snowball clause Avoid instruction creep Expectations and norms of the Wikipedia community Reasonability rule The...
Click to read more »07:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scope creep (talk • contribs) 07:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC) Speedy delete: Per nominator...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable. Fails WP:BIO. He is not a politician. scope_creep (talk) 17:51, 10 June 2018 (UTC) I swear, I just saw this one re-directed...
Click to read more »Fails Musicbio. Deleted in 2017. Coverage is mentioned in passing. scope_creepTalk 19:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »Thanks. scope_creep (talk) 15:13, 24 December 2017 (UTC) Pančevo 75.176.88.6 (talk) 15:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC) Thanks scope_creep (talk) 15:23, 24...
Click to read more »Fails WP:NCORP. Dead business. No indication of lasting importance. scope_creepTalk 08:51, 22 December 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »of others by tapping into the wisdom of the community rather than the wisdom of the few. Wikipedia:Instruction creep Wikipedia:Too long, didn't read...
Click to read more »cop, corrections officer, security guard. Appeared in Limitless. scope_creep (talk) 03:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »presence, possibly WP:TOOSOON. Seems to appear as presenter a lot. scope_creep (talk) 10:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »formalize a process which is informal and therefore in violation of WP:CREEP. I do not object to a user wanting to collate such incidents, but note that...
Click to read more »in the way of notability. Article seems to promote legal clinic. scope_creep (talk) 12:35, 20 March 2017 (UTC) Delete: Fails GNG and BIO after searching...
Click to read more »where 10's of thousands of Android developers will no doubt be using. scope_creep (talk) 00:13, 13 November 2010 (UTC). Well worth an article. Why isn't it...
Click to read more »doesn't present any valid references. Seems to fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. scope_creep talk 19:38, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy Delete WP:OR and WP:NFT. scope_creep (talk) 01:21, 17 August 2010 (UTC) Speedy delete per Scope_creep. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:22, 17 August...
Click to read more »football into Wisconsin–La Crosse Eagles. scope_creepTalk 00:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC) @Scope creep: can you show me where that discussion is located...
Click to read more »TWL) Non notable. Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. Guy doing his job. scope_creepTalk 22:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC) Speedy delete Clearly promotional, lacks...
Click to read more »Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Civil engineering company. Generic. scope_creepTalk 00:38, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »Contested PROD. ➥the Epopt 14:09, 28 October 2006 (UTC) Redirect to scope creep perhaps? Ned Wilbury 15:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC) Redirect per Ned Wilbury...
Click to read more »merge with accurate facts or more balanced coverage would be ideal. Scope creep (talk) 23:08, 27 September 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »and never been updated. Fails WP:NPROF. Refs are passing mentions. scope_creepTalk 08:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »merging. -- saberwyn 21:56, 20 April 2008 (UTC) Redirect back to Astro-Creep: 2000. I'm also guessing that nearly all the song from this album don't...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced article. UPE target. scope_creepTalk 17:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »profiles and a Forbes contributor ref. Very poor. No secondary coverage. scope_creepTalk 19:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »from a BLPPROD, there are no real references. This was prodded by Scope creep, I think correctly, but then immediately self-unprodded. —David Eppstein...
Click to read more »sufficient for a seed article per WP:THREE. scope_creepTalk 16:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC) Hi Scope creep, I think the article should be deleted for now and...
Click to read more »the Rakuten Institute of Technology site. scope_creep (talk) 11:10, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Scope creep, Bit of traction? What helped you to reach that...
Click to read more »Fails WP:NACTOR. Minor actor, mostly bit parts. Possibly WP:TOOSOON scope_creep (talk) 00:39, 31 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »facts. Simply not worth saving. scope_creep talk 16:57, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Delete Per nom and Muboshgu/scope_creep post. ///EuroCarGT 16:51, 31 August...
Click to read more »ago, but no one noticed it with no votes. Completely non notable. scope_creep (talk) 11:22, 4 February 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »single source. Can't see how they are notable. scope_creep (talk) 11:13, 24 December 2016 (UTC) scope_creep (talk) 11:13, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »some refs would make for a basic but functionality complete article. scope_creep (talk) 00:06, 21 December 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Delete No effective references since the get-go. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 10:57, 8 July 2022 (UTC) Keep. I used to live near this school. I would...
Click to read more »Styria in Graz", if there is an article on here or another WP. Thanks scope_creepTalk 20:44, 8 February 2025 (UTC) The Styrian association is the Naturwissenschaftlicher...
Click to read more »that group. Swinging to notable. scope_creep (talk) 22:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC) Comment. Michig, Scope creep, as Elisa.rolle has already pointed out...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable. Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. Puffy. scope_creepTalk 19:04, 17 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creepTalk 11:27, 9 November 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Standard trade papers reporting change of name. scope_creep (talk) 15:01, 3 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »article requested its delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scope creep (talk • contribs) 09:36, 3 March 2018 (UTC) Tactile imaging (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »them, we would writing this, on this medium. scope_creep (talk) 18:13, 9 November 2017 (UTC) @Scope creep: Then by all means, please share some of these references...
Click to read more »county commissioner, which is elected. Fails WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN. scope_creep (talk) 14:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NCORP. scope_creepTalk 14:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »think are a clear example of technology creep. I also note that Wikipedia does not have an entry for technology creep. User: DigsFish. Delete I'm sure the...
Click to read more »to exceed the post-expand include size limit. Wikipedia:Avoid template creep — An essay on navbox overuse. Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections — When the...
Click to read more »Spotify. He has fans. Quite a new artist. scope_creepTalk 19:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC) Question Hey scope_creep, I want to clarify something about your !vote...
Click to read more »Fails WP:BAND. They only formed about 4 weeks ago. Far far too soon. scope_creep (talk) 19:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC) How old do bands have to be then? Siuenti...
Click to read more »coverage. SL93 (talk) 02:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:IAR and WP:CREEP. I’m unable to see how the encyclopedia or reader experience is improved...
Click to read more »radio show. scope_creep (talk) 21:55, 13 April 2017 (UTC) Current single reference is a blog, and as such is invalid. scope_creep (talk) 22:24, 13 April...
Click to read more »in a auto mag. Non notable.Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 01:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC) scope_creep (talk) 01:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »TWL) Fails WP:NCORP. Part of a group of articles promoting the app. scope_creepTalk 15:50, 24 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »add a reference. scope_creep 11:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC) Delete No mention in Cert, McAfee or Symantec databases. scope_creep 12:19, 9 December 2015...
Click to read more »BladesGodric 06:46, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Keep Two albums in Spotify. scope_creep (talk) 07:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Is that one of the WP:NMUSIC criteria? Dom...
Click to read more »com/od/womeninbusinessanswers/a/Wib-Answers-What-Is-The-Definition-Of-Christmas-Creep.htm (R/Xmeta/L) User is in a trusted group sysop on some wikis 2014-03-11...
Click to read more »that come to mind. Its not had an external copyedit yet. Thanks, scope_creepTalk 17:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC) Comments after a quick skim. There are some...
Click to read more »Ongoing objectives: Simplify and merge redundant pages. Prevent instruction creep and overly technical language. Improve navigation and page layout. Ensure...
Click to read more »WP:SIGCOV, [{WP:BIO]]. It is brochure articles disguised as a BLP. scope_creepTalk 16:20, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Delete per all the well argued points of...
Click to read more »it not worth leaving it for several weeks to see how it develops. scope_creep (talk) 11:01, 4 September 2017 (UTC) It's borderline promotional and reliable...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Bio article, failed draft. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 16:10, 17 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »notability. Fails WP:BIO. Most of the sources are about series or host. scope_creepTalk 23:01, 16 December 2018 (UTC) Keep Wrong - This person is notable -...
Click to read more »Arbitration Committee regarding this guideline Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep, to minimize potential motivations for point-illustrating Wikipedia:Drop...
Click to read more »the article for promotion. Fails WP:SIGCOV. No, cant see anything. scope_creep (talk) 18:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BIO. Company chairman, who is not notable. scope_creep talk 09:10, 6 September 2014 (UTC) Comment Apparently this is the second...
Click to read more »the dates in. Seems better. Thanks Orangemike. scope_creepTalk 20:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC) @Scope creep: Richard Wagner is a FA and has sections like Richard...
Click to read more »proposals may be proposed is not constructive (not to mention m:instruction creep). Radiant_>|< 13:19, August 15, 2005 (UTC) Speedy keep, of course. At least...
Click to read more »Seems to an obscure wee college. Clearly non-notable, fails WP:ORG. scope_creep (talk) 01:18, 15 April 2013 (UTC) KEEP Appears to be an existing vo-tech...
Click to read more »piece article about Chief Financial Officer. Not notable. No refs. scope_creep (talk) 15:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the...
Click to read more »and is well know human rights website. scope_creep (talk) 11:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Keep per scope_creep. - Mgm|(talk) 15:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »articles for India's locations also has an entry for the location. scope_creep (talk) 19:36, 26 August 2010 (UTC) The article has no sources, and also...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable company. Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creepTalk 21:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »Non-notable. WP:MILL. Fails WP:ORGCRITE, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND. scope_creepTalk 01:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »which is disallowed. "Personal life and death" falling victim to example-creep, several randomly appended one-sentence paragraphs. Overall the article...
Click to read more »which seem to be mix of entertainment blogs and invalid entries. scope_creep (talk) 10:59, 14 March 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) BLP article that has been prodded twice, with no sources. scope_creep (talk) 11:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »see how he is notable. Clearly fails WP:ARTIST. Delete and Salt.}} scope_creep 14:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC) Weak Keep - There are some sources, such as...
Click to read more »is no more notable that the average film extra or tv guest star. scope_creep talk 19:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC) Delete Minor actress and television personality...
Click to read more »Stranger Things. On a more sombre note, death and sexual harassment also creep in to disrupt the conversation, as they are wont to do. Google played its...
Click to read more »cultural movement, which has been gaining momentum for a number of years scope_creep 19:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Delete as a non-notable event. Valrith 22:34...
Click to read more »like any other article, through consensus. scope_creep (talk) 18:52, 14 September 2018 (UTC) @Scope creep: I do not really appreciate this comment: MarioGom...
Click to read more »scope_creep (talk) 18:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC) Which definition? J-ſtanTalkContribs 19:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC) Delete non-notable school. Scope_creep must...
Click to read more »generic reference, some name drops, some bios of non-notable people. scope_creepTalk 23:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. Potentially notable. scope_creepTalk 17:56, 14 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »Profiles and sps sources. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Very very early career. scope_creepTalk 18:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »References are routine announcements. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 13:00, 18 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »skit. All the detail is information about new company from merger. scope_creep (talk) 13:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC) Hello, We will contribute more to this...
Click to read more »referenced at all. All refs point to Casey Neistat. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 10:51, 28 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »upgrading it, less than a week ago, and now you have nominated it. scope_creep talk 22:57 10 November 2013 (UTC) Delete. Sources are not independent: they...
Click to read more »such as major organizations with an interest Points of view starting to creep in, minority dissent from the authorities and other monographs Spam for...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 17:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »WP:ENT. TV personality. Clearly not notable. scope_creep talk 19:56, 23 August 2014 (UTC) Keep @Scope creep:This person has even gained some coverage in Chinese...
Click to read more »a means to avoid the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scope_creep">scope creep</a> endemic to first-time-makers' projects. We will engage in weekly...
Click to read more »scheduling engine, which is now established notability guidelines. scope_creep (talk) 14:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »news. Nothing of wayback machine. I thought there would be more. scope_creep (talk) 18:34, 3 April 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »2016. Very minor as yet. 5-10 years may be different. Fails WP:BIO scope_creep (talk) 13:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »profiles and annoucement of directorship. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 11:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »extent. This is a perfect example. Template:Toomanyboxes Wikipedia:Template madness Wikipedia:Avoid template creep – A less humorous take on the issue...
Click to read more »Don't think the girl is notable. Original article was a redirect. scope_creep (talk) 17:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC) Keep. This article passes both BIO...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) User:Scope creep sent this to draft space but it was edit warred back by the creator without...
Click to read more »Local coverage only. Fails WP:SIGCOV. No fans, no social media. scope_creepTalk 07:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »merely duplicating information what has been created somewhere else. scope_creepTalk 09:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion...
Click to read more »sources. Possibly a redirect would be better. Scope creep (talk) 12:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC) scope_creep Note: This debate has been included in the list of...
Click to read more »October 2022 (UTC) Delete Seems to be almost no references here at all. scope_creepTalk 10:38, 3 October 2022 (UTC) Note: A new reference from Metro has been...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Weak Delete I can't find anything which says its notable. scope_creep (talk) 12:24, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Comment The fact you can't get it in...
Click to read more »would be sufficient for the article as stands. scope_creepTalk 16:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC) @Scope creep: I'm a little perplexed by your !vote. Does that mean...
Click to read more »Fails WP:BIO. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:41, 9 March 2022 (UTC) @Mccapra, Scope creep, and Vinegarymass911: Pinging as interested editors not already notified...
Click to read more »affected by the Sars scare just after it opened early in the year. scope_creepTalk 11:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC) There is sufficient coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Still fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 16:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was snow creep keep. BencherliteTalk 21:22, 14 September 2015 (UTC) AfDs for this article:...
Click to read more »articles; this is just fan-cruft creep, with no encyclopædic value. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:17, 31 August 2005 (UTC) Creep? OmegaWikipedia 04:24, 2 September...
Click to read more »added by Cbl62 (talk • contribs) 02:19, 16 April 2017 (UTC) delete, navbox creep. Frietjes (talk) 14:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »this page. The result was keep. WP:SNOW close. (non-admin closure) scope_creep (talk) 07:54, 24 September 2018 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for...
Click to read more »Creep in composite materials (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://www.compositelink.com/resources/quantitative-dmta-of-composites/. R00m c (talk)...
Click to read more »this area. scope_creep (talk) 12:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC) Weak keep. The topic is probably notable as explained above by Scope_Creep, but it definitely...
Click to read more »Comment This AfD results from a disagreement at the article itself. Scope creep and an IP editor, 72.95.130.125, both attempted to convert the article to...
Click to read more »Nothing in there except working at a radio station, non notable. scope_creep 00:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC) comment:Author went to the country of Mongolia...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Wikipedia is not a directory WP:NOT. scope_creep (talk) 10:22, 15 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »template creep. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC) Question is it possible to keep the template in some state and avoid template creep at the same...
Click to read more »announcements, passing mentions and so on. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:NCORP. scope_creepTalk 00:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »to have much text of their own, but links to disambiguation pages always creep in. Before removing an entry from this list, please make sure that you have...
Click to read more »is kept, it needs additional sources and work, otherwise delete. scope_creep (talk) 16:36, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Merge with Death of Diana, Princess...
Click to read more »the financial community. Simply non notable. scope_creep 21:21, 23 August 2014 (UTC) Keep @Scope creep: The nominator's rationale is not in line with WP:GNG...
Click to read more »notable than the list of Static Analysis tools already on Wikipedia. scope_creep (talk) 22:59, 16 August 2010 (UTC) Comment: Just because there's a list...
Click to read more »article. Refs WP:PRIMARY, promo, PR and profiles. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 12:49, 26 December 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »in a short film, and he stands out amongst a group of 87 people. scope_creep (talk) 08:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »Non-notable businessman. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. Some minor coverage. scope_creepTalk 10:59, 1 November 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »from the same announcement. CEO announcement is not-independent. scope_creepTalk 11:47, 12 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »acronym. Wikipedia is not a manual. Fails WP:NOT. Addendum:86% copyvio. scope_creepTalk 23:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »Withdrawn. Excellent work by AmericanAir88. (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk 23:19, 16 October 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »who often wishes for a You're Welcome button? (Not to encourage process creep ) – Athaenara ✉ 02:46, 4 October 2018 (UTC) Get the latest headlines on...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) Redirect to Columbine High School massacre. I encourage scope_creep to redact the violations of WP:BLP in the intemperate comment above. Cullen328...
Click to read more »and mandated news as the company is partially government owned. scope_creepTalk 19:16, 5 November 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »isn't a reason for delete, nor is clean-up. scope_creepTalk 12:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC) @Scope creep: no WP:PUFF isn’t a reason to delete an article that’s...
Click to read more »think I'm trying to determine the quality of the article compared to other and better bio articles. Thanks, scope_creep 18:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »of being notable. Some minor coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 21:05, 10 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »indication of notability. Fails WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGCRIT and WP:SIRS scope_creepTalk 21:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Article about subject that fails WP:SIGCOV. No coverage scope_creep (talk) 08:52, 21 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »'only' open source, native Actionscript compiler confers notability. scope_creep talk 18:23 29 October 2013 (UTC) Just a comment: Not sure that follows....
Click to read more »with BLP-Prod removed by SPA account Ali ACER - 2. No references. scope_creep (talk) 08:39, 22 December 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »lacking in confidece that this is a notable article. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 13:04, 9 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »coverage, but insufficient to establish WP:PRODUCER and WP:NACTOR. scope_creepTalk 23:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Delete. Not well known.TamilMirchi (talk)...
Click to read more »That's was a big miss, obviously. Consider it Keep scope_creep talk 17:15 4 Aug 2014 (UTC) scope_creep talk 18:22, 3 August 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Is this...
Click to read more »UMD releases which is all Amazon references. scope_creepTalk 07:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC) @Scope creep: A crucial point you're ignoring is that the article...
Click to read more »and they can be proven to be correct, then he is eminently notable. scope_creepTalk 10:12, 11 February 2019 (UTC) Comment. They are pulled in via some automated...
Click to read more »Keep. The term is all over the web. scope_creep (talk) 20:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC) Keep What Scope creep said, this style is popular albeit and has...
Click to read more »WP:PERP. Generic. It is essentially WP:BLP1E and fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 03:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »credited with starting a new architectural movement. (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk 19:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »from two base articles. No need for it. scope_creep (talk) 3:23, 16 August 2010 (UTC) Delete what scope_creep said; article seems to be a unreferenced list...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) PRODed twice already. I concur with User:Scope creep's rationale: "Fails the new WP:NCORP standard. Startup with routine news...
Click to read more »famous or even notable. scope_creepTalk 13:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. As Scope creep said, the company's only claim...
Click to read more »Fails WP:NPROF. Low citation count on Google Scholar. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 13:49, 14 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. As Scope creep has pointed out, this is a discussion, not a vote, and the more comprehensive...
Click to read more »only relevant navigational boxes, and be aware of Wikipedia:Avoid template creep Coordinates - use {{Coord|display=title|region:CA_type:city}} to geo-tag...
Click to read more »Governor's Deputy General Manager and General Manager of Security Police. scope_creep talk 22:15 5 September 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »Brother Brazil contestant. Both of these are considered no notable. scope_creep (talk) 22:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Think it fails WP:BIO Can't see notability. scope_creep talk 21:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »article. I say, expand the article,tidy up, link and categorise. scope_creep 18:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC) Comment The articles if you have read them...
Click to read more »for deletion/Ulugbekhon Maksumov under a slightly different name. scope_creepTalk 14:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »deleted--extrapolating the expansion creep is kinda scary. Niteowlneils 19:09, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC) On the contrary, sanity-creep is reassuring. --Centauri 22:06...
Click to read more »attempting to source this from search engines now with "tech creep" will be difficult ("tech creep" being my made-up term regarding my theory it's often harder...
Click to read more »be suitable for a stand-alone article. Taking into account info by Scope creep, below, that one of the sources may be pr spam, I tried finding another...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Really known for a single event. scope_creepTalk 13:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. scope_creepTalk 08:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »featured topic dedicated to Saturn. Otherwise we will soon see some "mission creep."--Burzum 15:53, 19 December 2006 (UTC) NOTE - I'm crossing out Enceladus...
Click to read more »of the mill business new, driven from press releases and AI Hype. scope_creepTalk 00:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC) Delete As you said above, fails to comply...
Click to read more »Era. Result is Redirect. Nomination Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk 08:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »IT shop. Generic. References WP:MILL. Fails WP:NCORP, WP:ORGCRIT. scope_creepTalk 01:46, 28 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »on encyclopedic knowledge, its informative and well sourced. Keep. scope_creep (talk) 08:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC) Keep but - Change it into a list. The...
Click to read more »sounds when you say it. It makes no sense. scope_creepTalk 16:29, 2 November 2022 (UTC) @Scope creep, Sorry, I'm new to deletion discussions and not great...
Click to read more »—Preceding unsigned comment added by Scope creep (talk • contribs) Keep For all the same reasons as Scope creep including crappy writing dig. Hansonc 21:02...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BIO. No effective referencing. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 17:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »mentions and interviews. One film won an award. Potentially notable. scope_creepTalk 15:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable. Generic. scope_creepTalk 19:37, 25 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BIO. Unable to determine notability. scope_creep (talk) 21:21, 13 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »all-volunteer project that anyone can edit, errors or omissions can and do creep in. This should be kept in mind when reading; the very nature of Wikipedia...
Click to read more »User:Scope creep Voted on wrong AFD. Rlink2 (talk) 22:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC) @Rlink2: You have voted twice, once for delete, for keep??? scope_creepTalk 22:51...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced TV series article. Non-notable. scope_creepTalk 14:11, 1 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »expanded and updated with sources, wikified, and re-written in places. scope_creep (talk) 15:30, 18 November 2007 (UTC) It is definitely not the Humboldt Prize...
Click to read more »18 February 2018 (UTC) Thanks.Fut.Perf., scope_creep (talk) 14:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Scope creep, the word order may have been challenging for the...
Click to read more »2009. No notability whatsoever. A simple ISP. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. scope_creep 21:27, 5 September 2014 (UTC) Delete - The article seems to be promotional...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Spam article. Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 17:36, 21 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »(calculated overlap CreepshowCreep <-> creepshowcreeps.com; diff)). Reports 00:57:27, Sat Nov 17, 2007 en:user:CreepshowCreep <-> creepshowcreeps.com (100%/77...
Click to read more »submitted a page on my employer at Draft:OANDA that was rejected by @Scope creep: for being “contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia” and because it “ Breaks...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:MUSICBIO. No effective sources. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 19:17, 8 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »the western world is genuine. This schoool is in Plymouth, England.scope_creep (talk) 21:15, 12 November 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Fails WP:ORG, WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. Reads like an advertisement. scope_creep talk 17:24, 1 August 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the...
Click to read more »first album, Pablo Honey (1993), preceded by their breakthrough single "Creep", features a sound reminiscent of alternative rock bands such as the Pixies...
Click to read more »Malayalam language. Please do the work and find government listing. scope_creep (talk) 10:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC) I wasn't aware there was a Malayalam language...
Click to read more »the bullet soon, doesn't. But I think worth keeping for the OBE. scope_creep (talk) 00:25, 13 November 2010 (UTC) Comment. I haven't yet looked into...
Click to read more »Google Books. scope_creep (talk) 01:27, 22 August 2010 (UTC) Comment British History Online has no mention of it either. scope_creep (talk) 01:27, 22 August...
Click to read more »Google Earth image on Wikipedia? Thanks. scope_creepTalk 10:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC) Hello, Scope creep. As far as I can see, all images from Google Earth...
Click to read more »Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 21:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC) Delete as per nom. scope_creep (talk) 23:45, 16 August 2010 (UTC) Delete - fails general notability guidelines...
Click to read more »Possible puff piece. Fails WP:BIO. No real sources for BLP article. scope_creep (talk) 12:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC) Keep - While a lot of it is fluff -...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable hotel. Highly promotional. scope_creep (talk) 10:26, 27 April 2018 (UTC) Comment It is somewhat notable when using...
Click to read more »redundant with other policies and is an excellent example of instruction creep. What problems does its existence actually solve? What unique value does...
Click to read more »coverage for business. Lots of press release including BBC article. scope_creepTalk 12:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »fully satisfy WP:CNG. It should be trimmed/merged into Savage_Land. scope_creep talk 16:10, 06 October 2013 (UTC) Comment if this article indeed does have...
Click to read more »considered instruction creep, but the additional step is intended to make the RFA process more fair and equitable. Instruction creep should be avoided only...
Click to read more »games, that influenced several others including Alone in the Dark. scope_creep (talk) 09:44, 20 March 2018 (UTC several I think there should be with a...
Click to read more »by known sock? If it is dodgy, it goes. scope_creep (talk) Delete and Salt with no redirect. scope_creep (talk) 14:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »different reasons than the ones I am interested in (namely fed up with edit creep, and fed up with lone cranks or crank subculture vandalism). This list is...
Click to read more »references indicate non-notable. Fails WP:NACTOR. scope_creepTalk 06:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC) @Scope creep: Hii Sir, I have a question. If a movie doesn't have...
Click to read more »WP:SIGCOV. Refs are passing mentions and profiles. No secondary coverage. scope_creepTalk 23:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BIO. No indication of notability. scope_creep (talk) 16:17, 4 February 2017 (UTC) Keep A quick search on Google produces...
Click to read more »28m plays on Spotify, so I think his music is notable. Solid Keep. scope_creepTalk 20:52, 5 April 2019 (UTC) You just argued that the guy is notable, which...
Click to read more »and WP:ORGIND. No coverage outside advertising. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 00:18, 15 December 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »Delete The Guardian article confirms the data results are suspect. scope_creep (talk) 13:51, 20 March 2018 (UTC) Delete and propose deletion of the Wansink...
Click to read more »wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creep_(TLC_song)&diff=581392974&oldid=581203609; https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creep_(TLC_song)&diff=583679576&oldid=581451544;...
Click to read more »in Red. Hope it helps. scope_creepTalk 13:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC) I thought this was a women. Its a dude. scope_creepTalk 13:19, 17 October 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »developed. Give it some time to add sources etc and further wikification. scope_creep 01:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Developed? You must be kidding. Did you check...
Click to read more »notable by definition. Reference's are for the most part name drops scope_creep (talk) 06:57, 2 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »Phil Selway (drums, percussion). Radiohead released their first single, "Creep", in 1992. The song was initially unsuccessful, but it became a worldwide...
Click to read more »(2), interviews with founder/ceo, press-releases, listicles and PR. scope_creepTalk 00:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 10:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the...
Click to read more »their lasting impact and its important we keep a history of them. scope_creep 14:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:WEB. The only thing that looks...
Click to read more »Advertising article, much puff evidenced. Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 22:55, 21 June 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »scope_creepTalk 20:56, 17 August 2019 (UTC) Maybe—as a WP editor with only 4 years experience—I'm not understanding something, but has scope_creep considered...
Click to read more »no more information than what is found in the single references. scope_creep (talk) 22:07, 11 July 2013 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion...
Click to read more »think they just made it in the last few days. (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk 15:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »celebratory but not a musician. No fans, no plays, no social media. scope_creepTalk 10:05, 22 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. Non-notable. scope_creepTalk 17:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Highly promotional. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 07:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC) Keep Article states facts and brings plenty...
Click to read more »Missidentification with artist Rolando Peña born 1958. (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk 06:28, 26 May 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »[Category:American hedge fund managers] and [Category:English hedge fund managers] scope_creep talk 17:53, 25 July 2014 (UTC) Keep: This piece is about an important British...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. References are profiles. scope_creepTalk 15:59, 15 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 20:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC) Delete — Per rationale provided by scope_creep. Celestina007 (talk) 00:00, 19 June...
Click to read more »Supposed IOT leader, but no evidence offered. One amongst many. scope_creep (talk) 21:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...
Click to read more »Zero notability. scope_creep (talk) 00:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC) Another recreated article after being speedied. scope_creep (talk) 01:34, 1 January 2017...
Click to read more »interest. Wikipedia:WikiProject Mailboxes in Red Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep ← Previous "Humour" Next "Humour" → In this issue 27 February 2022 (all comments)...
Click to read more »that Creep Colonies damage units and buildings, simply having enemy units stand on top of the Creep, or the Creep growing to the point that the Creep is...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP, WP:DEL4, and per WP:DEL14. Generic. scope_creepTalk 07:46, 27 November 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »scope_creep I am notable enough. I have had reviews published in SOD Magazine, Terrorizer, and SpaceJunkies.net. And that's two years, Scope Creep. Phoeron...
Click to read more »avoiding instruction creep. El_C 14:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Indeed we should. And we do. But I'm looking at the talk page of WP:CREEP and seeing very little...
Click to read more »There is a justifiable concern that this process will add more instruction creep just to handle a minority of "wedge cases" when most RfAs don't require...
Click to read more »find the sources for the article and determine the validity of it. scope_creep (talk) 19:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Comment Had a look at the manuals,...
Click to read more »Fails WP:BIO. No effective referencing. All refs seems to be his. scope_creepTalk 08:01, 14 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »Edwardx (talk) 19:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Delete BLP with no sources. scope_creep (talk) 01:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...
Click to read more »Delete Again, another vanity piece, failing to assert notability. scope_creep 22:34, 9 November 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive...
Click to read more »Soumyasch (talk • contribs) AchedDamiman Dgmjr05 Mrh30 The Paper Press scope_creep Flaminglawyer (talk · contribs) Ravichandar OwenBlacker (talk · contribs)...
Click to read more »Discovered several sources that indicate notability. (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk 10:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »of months familiarity with Wikipedia articles. Without this, errors will creep in and you will succeed only in annoying and alienating the many editors...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND. Sources are mix of churnalism, blogs and press releases. scope_creep (talk) 14:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »editors at African American Vernacular English and the original research creep at Non-native pronunciations of English. The biggest gap, on a language...
Click to read more »Strong Keep Professor of classical archaeology at a noted university. scope_creepTalk 09:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC) Professor of which "noted university" and...
Click to read more »scope_creepTalk 08:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC) Can we add this: Škoda 31Tr SOR and this Škoda 30Tr SOR and Škoda 14Tr and Škoda 15Tr. Thanks. scope_creepTalk...
Click to read more »Brand new actor at beginning of career. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:SIGCOV scope_creepTalk 18:13, 2 June 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »but no main work has been done to article for donks. scope_creep ([[User talk:scope_creep|talk] 03:31, 9 August 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a directory. Seems to meet WP:DEL6 and WP:DEL14. scope_creepTalk 22:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No reference to verify BLP. scope_creep (talk) 22:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC) Comment Sorry that was a mistake. Withdrawn...
Click to read more »Afd are found here: WP:AFDFORMAT. scope_creep (talk) 23:37, 13 July 2013 (UTC) Delete Fails [WP:BIO]]. scope_creep (talk) 23:38, 13 July 2013 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »of them being daughters. It is possible that this is one of them. scope_creepTalk 10:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC) comment - I did verify before accepting...
Click to read more »event, getting his 35 Rupees back. Coverage all stems from one event. scope_creepTalk 20:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »We need to preserve these early historical examples of web comics.scope_creep 17:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC) ...why do we need to preserve it? We are not...
Click to read more »WP:GNG. Chris (talk) 21:52, 16 August 2010 (UTC) Delete per nom. scope_creep (talk) 23:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fails general notability...
Click to read more »Keep Well established North American company that satisfies WP:ORG. scope_creep (talk) 22:16, 16 April 2013 (UTC) Remove This well established and respectable...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable award. Established in 2020. scope_creepTalk 21:38, 22 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:56, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Comment Seems to be speedied. scope_creep (talk) 12:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Comment. No such luck. Article name...
Click to read more »This results in incivility, a hostile editing environment, and instruction creep. This view often results in nihilism, the opinion that editors exist outside...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP, WP:DEL4 and WP:DEL14. scope_creepTalk 23:57, 26 November 2020 (UTC) Keep - the company has received significant...
Click to read more »Instruction Creep sounds interesting, but it is a pretty complex issue which is likely to give headaches, as most times instruction creep is accepted...
Click to read more »Delete There is nothing in this article that asserts any notability. scope_creep talk 16:15, 03 September 2013 (UTC) Delete or merge. Although probably yes...
Click to read more »Prod removed with no refs added. Not notable. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL scope_creep (talk) 09:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the...
Click to read more »its validity? How should such disputes be handled, or is it instruction creep to even define a process? Which party, if either, gets the benefit of the...
Click to read more »it's worth allowing the author to expand the article and explain it. scope_creep (talk) 01:52, 22 August 2010 (UTC) Perhaps, but that holds true for any...
Click to read more »article for peer review because as I plan to take it to GA. Thanks, scope_creepTalk 16:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC) Should be fine for GA. You might try for...
Click to read more »scope_creep (talk) 10:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC) What is UPE? FloridaArmy (talk) 10:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC) The paid editing crowd. scope_creep (talk) 17:28...
Click to read more »quite hard to find, since it's a specialist. Well worth keeping. scope_creep (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC) Thirty years. 1980 was thirty years ago...
Click to read more »[moved from oppose] Unfortunate tendency to massively promote instruction creep, particularly by creating many Templates and categories for topic-stubs...
Click to read more »ensure that the scope and tasks are clearly defined and will resist scope creep. Magioladitis is restricted from making any semi-automated edits which do...
Click to read more »only primary claim of notability, which I don't think is enough. scope_creep 22:37, 5 September 2014 (UTC) As the nom created this on the first afd page...
Click to read more »ry#Cryptanalysis_Successes_By_Country scope_creep (talk)-. It is the Czech Nazi state police. scope_creep (talk) 18:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC) Some WWII-era...
Click to read more »nominated the article for deletion, you don't need to do it twice scope_creep 15:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC) Comment There's a reason that I got into the...
Click to read more »Routine coverage, PR. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 05:22, 25 December 2025 (UTC) Hi @Scope creep! I would disagree with you on this. Would you mind...
Click to read more »that first AfD. Notifying the only still active past users MrOllie, scope_creep, LFaraone and Walter Görlitz and also close article contributor Otis Inf...
Click to read more »WP:ANYBIO. Störm (talk) 18:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Non notable.scope_creep (talk) 10:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Speedy delete-moot point now, but I...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of being notable. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 11:39, 19 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BIO and WP:ARTIST scope_creep 11:19, 25 August 2014 (UTC) Delete or Userfy A local artist with several...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable poet. Fails WP:BIO Repeatedly deleted. scope_creepTalk 22:18, 13 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »announcements for directors who have been in the mainstream for a year. scope_creepTalk 01:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »time to be a geek. On a more sombre note, death and sexual harassment also creep in to disrupt the conversation, as they are wont to do. Google played its...
Click to read more »--Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 15:00, 7 August 2005 (UTC) Delete. Instruction creep at its finest, a bit to subtle for BJAODN. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 17:13...
Click to read more »photographers you should know, which is a business listing anway. scope_creep (talk) 01:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »Non-notable producer. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV scope_creepTalk 21:41, 13 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »DE) which is located here: [1] Thanks scope_creep (talk) 06:05, 22 September 2017 (UTC) Hello, Scope creep. I took the liberty to reformat your post to...
Click to read more »Thanks scope_creep (talk) 23:38, 10 January 2018 (UTC) (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 00:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC) Thanks. scope_creep (talk) 01:08...
Click to read more »Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO. scope_creepTalk 12:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC) Umm... scope creep the sources being offered up are all from the...
Click to read more »to know what licence its asking for? Thanks. scope_creepTalk 01:07, 11 April 2022 (UTC) Scope_creep, You have uploaded File:Grove House School.jpg. You...
Click to read more »which has published 50k copies. Can't find anything on Google Iraq. scope_creep talk 1 August 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list...
Click to read more »page for this pure waste, and is clearly causing climate change. scope_creep (talk) 16:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Delete No secondary sources to establish...
Click to read more »notability pass. Huff ref is a blog. Don't think it passes rigorous BLP. scope_creep (talk) 00:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC) MMQB not MMQD stands for Monday Morning...
Click to read more »connected. Otherwise Delete. scope_creep (talk) 14:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Weak delete and disambiguate I think Scope creep hit it on the head here. While...
Click to read more »article satisfying WP:THREE until she becomes internationally famous.scope_creepTalk 09:44, 17 December 2019 (UTC) Comment - found this article in a scholarly...
Click to read more »said that only beteen 3%-8% of the worlds information is online. scope_creep 18:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC) Comment Where does it say it is the best small...
Click to read more »talk:S Marshall" }, { "title": "User talk:Scope creep" }, { "title": "User talk:Sdkb" }, ...
Click to read more »place for it? Thanks. scope_creep (talk) 22:25, 12 May 2018 (UTC) I wouldn't have thought it belongs there, scope_creep. The best thing could be to get...
Click to read more »that helps. scope_creepTalk 15:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC) Hi Folks!! Anybody know where Jamborkretz, Czechoslovakia is. Thanks. scope_creepTalk 15:45, 18 April...
Click to read more »WP:MUSICBIO. .116 in spotify. No fans, no social media. Not a music star. scope_creepTalk 18:01, 15 August 2021 (UTC) Commment This article has massively been...
Click to read more »Final is played in Jan 8th, 2018. Fails WP:NOT, specifically WP:BALL. scope_creep (talk) 12:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Non-notable organisation. References are PR and award is non-notable. scope_creepTalk 08:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC) Keep. Article has sources. Clockmaster68 (talk)...
Click to read more »nice to see linked in here somehow. Thanks. scope_creepTalk 11:33, 13 March 2025 (UTC) @Scope creep You can use the parameter |title-link in the {{cite...
Click to read more »tamper with it are instruction creep. I'd like to hear the reasons behind your belief that this proposal is not instruction creep while the other ones are....
Click to read more »into mainspace after failing review. No indication of notability. scope_creep (talk) 00:26, 4 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »adds yet more complexity to the Wikipedia world - instruction creep and confusion creep! Also was not discussed. Thanks/wangi 19:45, 30 December 2005...
Click to read more »based on [a specific administrator's] customized DS which has lead to POV creep and specific DS for specific editors as he sees fit. He is micromanaging...
Click to read more »discussions. ~Amkgp ✉ 03:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC) Comment: @Flori4nK, Scope creep, North8000, GSS, GPL93, Fitindia, Tagishsimon, and AlejandroLeloirRey: Request...
Click to read more »