1st Canadian Parliament all the way to 39th Canadian Parliament. See WP:CWNB/Parliament_Infobox for a discussion on creating an infobox for parliaments...
Click to read more »and wikiprojects, when there are two, to get merged with each other. WP:CWNB and WP:CANADA, WP:ZHWNB and WP:CHINA, Romanian and WP:ROMANIA, etc. 70.24...
Click to read more »discussions. -- kelapstick (talk) 20:00, 19 November 2009 (UTC), also listed at WP:CWNB Keep. Nominator should read point #2 of WP:POLITICIAN. Sherbrooke is a significant...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:31, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Note: This AfD has been raised at the CWNB by User:NorthernThunder. Franamax (talk) 09:46, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »parliaments – review and discuss proposed infobox template at Wikipedia:CWNB/Parliament Infobox. Other changes to improve consistency may also be needed...
Click to read more »where you got that from, but I defiantly wasn't canvassed. I found it on WP:CWNB. -Royalguard11(T·R!) 03:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC) Keep, but merge Tri-City...
Click to read more »Please note that this page is not often consulted by Wikipedia editors, and posting a request here is unlikely to garner an immediate response. If your...
Click to read more »Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC) @Skeezix1000: I did put it on the WT:CWNB. - Sweet Nightmares 15:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC) You're assuming that people...
Click to read more »WP:BDWNB and WP:BDB Unclear Unclear Canadian Wikipedians' notice board WP:CWNB and WP:CANBOARD Semi-Active/Unclear Unsure Caribbean Wikipedians' notice...
Click to read more »sides. --Splarka (rant) 22:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC) As I write this, WT:CWNB is included in Category:Categories for discussion notices - but it's not...
Click to read more »em-dash there instead of double hyphens?" discussions.) Accordingly, WP:CWNB has always had a consensus in place that federal electoral district names...
Click to read more »actually thought it was an error at first.) For these exact reasons, WP:CWNB has always had a consensus that federal electoral districts with em-dashes...
Click to read more »reason agreed on what we have now. Might want to float this one over on WP:CWNB The Tom 23:55, 15 November 2005 (UTC) That is a good idea. The bits of discussion...
Click to read more »where you got that from, but I defiantly wasn't canvassed. I found it on WP:CWNB. -Royalguard11(T·R!) 03:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC) Keep, but merge Tri-City...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:31, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Note: This AfD has been raised at the CWNB by User:NorthernThunder. Franamax (talk) 09:46, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »every article gets reviewed afterward, either by myself or by another WP:CWNB colleague, to ensure that it got done correctly, gets corrected quickly if...
Click to read more »discussions. -- kelapstick (talk) 20:00, 19 November 2009 (UTC), also listed at WP:CWNB Keep. Nominator should read point #2 of WP:POLITICIAN. Sherbrooke is a significant...
Click to read more »WP:SWNB, WP:UKWNB, WP:NZWNB, WP:PWNB and the one you used as a template, WP:CWNB. All in all thought, well done, definitely an improvement. -- Adz|talk 09:19...
Click to read more »—Mar·ka·ci:2005-02-20 13:39 Z Like many other page, it is merely a list of topics. The CWNB has many of these page with listing by theme and areas. OTOH, we could consider...
Click to read more »a single source, a student newspaper. This was already brought up at the CWNB, but I thought this is more relevant]. --Rob (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2009...
Click to read more »