Redirect to:
A Wikipedia article title is the large heading displayed above the article's content, and the basis for the article's page name and URL. The title indicates...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:47, 13 April 2020 (UTC) Selfstudier, Does it matter?We go by WP:COMMONAME. Shrike (talk) 18:57, 13 April 2020 (UTC) I admit to not having looked...
Click to read more »12 January 2017 (UTC) Speedy keep – ridiculous reason for AfD. See WP:COMMONAME and Sweating (cooking). Laurdecl talk 09:52, 12 January 2017 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »@Liz: I meant it should be renamed to Palletalawinna, as that is the WP:COMMONAME for the location. Dan arndt (talk) 07:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC) To muddy...
Click to read more »Function overview: Move scientific species names to common names per WP:COMMONAME. Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Edit period(s): Continuous...
Click to read more »hory. Each region has a different name which is primarily used per WP:COMMONAME. Catalonia, Balearic Islands and the Valencian Community are the anglicized...
Click to read more »for her "Kana". Dekimasuよ! 00:16, 16 June 2009 (UTC) You're right -- WP:COMMONAME would seem to rule here, requiring a move (including merging both relevant...
Click to read more »entities which describe themselves as the "government" in Syria, and the WP:COMMONAME for Assad's form of government is regime. Nulla Taciti (talk) 15:22, 28...
Click to read more »[1]; [2]; [3];; [4]; [5] ;; [6]; [7]; [8]. The modus is to disregard WP:COMMONAME, WP:NOINDICSCRIPT and being generally disruptive. Fylindfotberserk (talk)...
Click to read more »functional hostname, a copy-paste of which is entirely plausible. WP:COMMONAME does not apply to redirects. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 06:25, 4 February...
Click to read more »are the English commonames , yet you two seem to conflict each others arguments because one is claiming that those are Serbian commonames and the second...
Click to read more »Lambert (talk) 05:34, 9 February 2013 (UTC) Keep and upmerge per JPL and WP:COMMONAME. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:37, 9 February 2013 (UTC) Keep and...
Click to read more »(Talk:Wolverhampton#Splitting the article into a borough and the city): I think WP:COMMONAME has to come into play, I don't think in common usage a distinction is...
Click to read more »Comments: The user seems adamant. I've told them multiple times about the WP:COMMONAME and WP:NOINDICSCRIPT, but the keep on changing Allahabad to "Prayagraj"...
Click to read more »doesn't show up, can I request editors at WP:IN and those involved with WP:COMMONAME stuff in India related articles to discuss since the issue is based on...
Click to read more »the problem with something involving the "nitrate industry"? It's a WP:COMMONAME (92k Ghits), WP:ENGVAR-neutral, has Wiki category precedents, and is chemically...
Click to read more »they need to be entirely seperate. (Also, Byrma/Myanmar falls under WP:COMMONAME as just Burma, I'd believe.) -The Bushranger One ping only 00:59, 20 March...
Click to read more »D Train (entertainer) was moved to James D-Train Williams (against WP:COMMONAME). 2) Persistent lack of usage of WP:MOS in disambiguation pages (and articles...
Click to read more »speaks for itself [100]. He did not understand/ignored the guideline of WP:COMMONAME as well, multiple times changing the name of articles to its supposed...
Click to read more »to present empirical evidence that the new title is preferred under WP:COMMONAME. In fact, the basis of the argument was simply that the New York Times...
Click to read more »2a02:214C:801e:eC00:713d:57bc:f319:c289/38 . In Inner Mongolia, it said that per WP:COMMONAME. The country's name is "People's Republic of China", NOT "Mainland China"...
Click to read more »07:23, 13 April 2013 (UTC) did it to Intel Core as well. WP:TITLE, WP:COMMONAME and WP:trademark all support Intel Core. the disambiguation is wholly...
Click to read more »BilledMammal. They are also saying the exact opposite of what the WP:COMMONAME policy states and I don't feel like their response is productive or collegial...
Click to read more »page is full of warnings and discussions on this particular topic: WP:COMMONAME, Article title, Article moves, December 2021, Page moves. Almost all of...
Click to read more »genuinely believe that proper adherence to the hierarchy of policies (COMMONAME has it's place for example - and it's not at the very top), and a new...
Click to read more »name in cases of simple renaming" process that is widely followed, WP:COMMONAME, and the large overlaps at both ends of the CF's existence as a maritime...
Click to read more »"Deobandi ulama" being a widely-used term follows the naming policy of WP:COMMONAME, and that the arguments in favour of "Deobandi scholars" are not so well-founded...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:46, 13 June 2014 (UTC) Keep for reasons stated above. See WP:COMMONAME. No one says we have to go by the name on the ballot. --4idaho (talk)...
Click to read more »Category:Presidents of the Landtag of Liechtenstein Nominator's rationale: Per WP:COMMONAME, the official title of the role is president of the Landtag of Liechtenstein...
Click to read more »"Play-STation", "Play-station", etc., etc.). The standards are different. COMMONAME wants us to choose the most commonly found name in reliable sources and...
Click to read more »Oppose. While the company is officially as Brandmeister states, the WP:COMMONAME for the current company used in reliable sources on the subject is, in...
Click to read more »sources are English language-based is simply you rejecting en.wp policy. WP:COMMONAME is explicitly based on English-language reliable sources. Your list of...
Click to read more »(talk) 04:10, 20 March 2010 (UTC) Oppose per head article mango and WP:COMMONAME. Wikipedia is written for a general audience, not the botanical specialists...
Click to read more »Ol’factory (talk) 04:25, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Rename per nom, C2D, and WP:COMMONAME. "UCLA" is widely recognised and also used in other alumni subcats. -...
Click to read more »-GTBacchus(talk) 19:18, 20 July 2011 (UTC) Oppose it would create a conflict with WP:COMMONAME. Like it or not, in most cases the overwhelming majority of English-speaking...
Click to read more »Ol’factory (talk) 04:25, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Rename per nom, C2D, and WP:COMMONAME. "UCLA" is widely recognised and also used in other alumni subcats. -...
Click to read more »at the target page". So for example, if I changed your links from [[WP:COMMONAME]] to [[WP:ARTICLETITLES|COMMONNAME]] to avoid the redirect even though...
Click to read more »Cumbria" should follow it. Unlike in the US the "Placename, State" isn't WP:COMMONAME its just disambiguation. The move request at Talk:Windermere, Cumbria...
Click to read more »suggests that the formal title (i.e. with the "Veberable" prefix) is the commoname of the college: 348,000 ghits with venerable, but only 49,600 ghits without...
Click to read more »for her "Kana". Dekimasuよ! 00:16, 16 June 2009 (UTC) You're right -- WP:COMMONAME would seem to rule here, requiring a move (including merging both relevant...
Click to read more »12 January 2017 (UTC) Speedy keep – ridiculous reason for AfD. See WP:COMMONAME and Sweating (cooking). Laurdecl talk 09:52, 12 January 2017 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »own analysis a full 70% favored the move. The panel aptly noted that WP:COMMONAME was the rationale cited by a large number of supporters of the move. Again...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:47, 13 April 2020 (UTC) Selfstudier, Does it matter?We go by WP:COMMONAME. Shrike (talk) 18:57, 13 April 2020 (UTC) I admit to not having looked...
Click to read more »differently to the point that a new demonym, whatever it may be, becomes the WP:COMMONAME. Then, and only then, should Wikipedia refrain from using "British" to...
Click to read more »(Talk:Wolverhampton#Splitting the article into a borough and the city): I think WP:COMMONAME has to come into play, I don't think in common usage a distinction is...
Click to read more »official site. What's more, AFI Conservatory respects the guideline WP:COMMONAME. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:15, 12 June 2009 (UTC) They also appear to...
Click to read more »Rename all. The head article is at South Dublin, which is also its WP:COMMONAME. This has been the article's uncontested name since this move in 2009...
Click to read more »as an indication that Artificial whitewater courses appears to be a WP:COMMONAME. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:14, 28 July 2009 (UTC) Fair enough - I bow...
Click to read more »July 2012 (UTC) rename to Category:Sylvia (genus) - I believe the WP:COMMONAME, at least on this side of the pond, is "Old World warblers", I've never...
Click to read more »corporate name based on WP:SOAPBOX/WP:OR claims rather than WP:AT/WP:COMMONAME (like Scstadm (talk · contribs · count) on Levi's Stadium[27] and Globe...
Click to read more »Northern Ireland. 78.19.65.254 (talk) 13:22, 18 March 2008 (UTC) See WP:COMMONAME, which incidentally allows Londonderry (official name of city) to be located...
Click to read more »if someone wants to categorize someone as terrorist (which is the WP:COMMONAME they should not be forced to spend their time trying to figure out what...
Click to read more »and concise doesn't matter at two/three words; The Rambling Man argued COMMONAME with the longer version being for commercial reasons; Dicklyon argued...
Click to read more »[54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60]. For article titles, see WP:COMMONAME which says "Determine the most common name by seeing what verifiable reliable...
Click to read more »commas and a dash; these are all elements of English grammar. The WP:COMMONAME is golden jackal. The MOS:ALTNAMEs are, in my opinion, not significantly...
Click to read more »sometimes considered derogatory), but there is clear consensus per WP:COMMONAME that this is the correct term to use for that side of Singer's business...
Click to read more »most sources, resulting that the ellipsis are making "Hours..." the WP:COMMONAME. In a second comment Amakuru decided to not discuss what I pointed them...
Click to read more »unfortunately. I just don't see a consensus to move here. As Amakuru says, the WP:COMMONAME argument is compelling and wasn't really countered.--Cúchullain t/c 18:56...
Click to read more »sources (particularly American ones) may be skewed to a national POV thus COMMONAME is not a good policy to use here. The closing comments do not appear to...
Click to read more »protection: Until the move discussion has concluded. I argue that group's WP:COMMONAME is being ignored. Based on the editor's writing, it seems the editor is...
Click to read more »(Initiated 2037 days ago on 15 January 2021) Requesting admin closure on the discussion to add OpenCritic Percentage Recommended Score to Video Game Manual...
Click to read more »every subsequent reference to the man calls him "Narsi Reddy". The WP:COMMONAME appears to be "C. Narsi Reddy"; most reports don't even mention what "C...
Click to read more »Drive, but about stressing the misconception that Genesis is not the WP:COMMONAME and having both names share equal weight. Editors are not accepting a...
Click to read more »if someone wants to categorize someone as terrorist (which is the WP:COMMONAME they should not be forced to spend their time trying to figure out what...
Click to read more »Baldwin#Article move. A permalink for it is here. The discussion concerns WP:COMMONAME, its WP:NAMECHANGES subsection, and there being no confirmation that Baldwin...
Click to read more »commas and a dash; these are all elements of English grammar. The WP:COMMONAME is golden jackal. The MOS:ALTNAMEs are, in my opinion, not significantly...
Click to read more »@Marcocapelle, that is odd. Because I don't believe RADA does not apply to WP:COMMONAME. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:21, 2 January 2024 (UTC) I left a notice at...
Click to read more »might mean that there is is not enough evidence to invalidate the non-COMMONAME arguments of me and other editors. — AjaxSmack 00:53, 25 February 2023...
Click to read more »WP:CONSISTENCY, WP:RECOGNIZABILITY, WP:BIAS, etc. If a particular monarch's WP:COMMONAME falls outside the format of the guidelines, it will always be made an...
Click to read more »"People's Republic of Bangladesh" is the full name of the country, per WP:COMMONAME "Bangladesh" is the correct title for this article on Wikipedia. Secondly...
Click to read more »fiveby(zero) 13:12, 25 May 2026 (UTC) The other wrinkle is no consistent WP:COMMONAME. CARET is basically a rather obscure UFO conspiracy theory about secret...
Click to read more »Jessintime (talk) 17:12, 23 July 2026 (UTC) I also count 6 "Oppose per WP:COMMONAME votes without any further explanation, 1 oppose vote without any explanation...
Click to read more »@Liz: I meant it should be renamed to Palletalawinna, as that is the WP:COMMONAME for the location. Dan arndt (talk) 07:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC) To muddy...
Click to read more »GreatStellatedDodecahedron (talk) 13:28, 29 April 2026 (UTC) We use the WP:COMMONAME for article titles. I didn't find a single source that italicizes "Summetria"...
Click to read more »within WP:IDHT as you are not only not accepting that Wikipedia follows WP:COMMONAMES (as you were told on your own RM), but you want to enforce us to leave...
Click to read more »baseless; it’s not a policy-based position. —В²C ☎ 20:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC) WP:COMMONAME and WP:RECOGNIZABILITY are policy. And it is not baseless. As someone...
Click to read more »name, but it is not "obviously" the most frequently used, again, the COMMONAME as defined for our internal purposes does not exist. In the above example...
Click to read more »leader. Dr Fell (talk) 02:59, 1 March 2026 (UTC) Sino-Japanese War is COMMONAME and not MOS. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 03:20, 1 March 2026 (UTC) In this...
Click to read more »therefore, it should be the name. However, We strongly disagree per WP:COMMONAMES as still insisting and Howard thinks that their argument are WP:IGNORE...
Click to read more »