Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcuts WP:CITINGIMDBWP:CITINGIMDB WP:CITEIMDBWP:CITEIMDB...
Click to read more »at WP:CITEIMDB is very helpful, I found it enlightening. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 15:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC) @MistyGraceWhite, according to WP:CITEIMDB, I believe...
Click to read more »Delete - No sources except for IMDB, which is not a reliable source per WP:CITEIMDB. Koridas talk? 06:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC) Delete As i already tagged it...
Click to read more »05:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC) Strong delete, only one "source" which fails WP:CITEIMDB. dibbydib (T ･ C) 05:49, 21 April 2020 (UTC) Keep. I've added some content...
Click to read more »absolutely nothing to do with the actress, and the last two sources fail WP:CITEIMDB. This proves that she isn't notable in any way. 🌴Koridas🌴 (Negotiate)...
Click to read more »2018 (UTC) Delete per the above. A note that IMDB is not a WP:RS, per WP:CITEIMDB. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »it is not considered a reliable source for Wikipedia. See the essay WP:CITEIMDB. Schmidt, Michael Q. 20:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC) Makes sense, thanks for...
Click to read more »by an editor saying IMDB is reliable but isn't reliable either per WP:CITEIMDB. Fails GNG and BIO. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:13, 17...
Click to read more »of the content is copied and pasted from IMBD, with scant regard for WP:CITEIMDB the author hasn't even bothered to paraphrase. Just compare the first sentence...
Click to read more »in pretty bad shape, bordering either on WP:OR or WP:FANCRUFT, and WP:CITEIMDB, which are not good. Bluesphere 08:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »unreliable. Here's an explanation: 1. Cites a Google search, not reliable 2. WP:CITEIMDB 3. Page is just a collection of his books with no biographical information...
Click to read more »provide feedback. Dflaw4 (talk) 07:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC) Delete - per WP:CITEIMDB. 🌺Kori🌺 - (@) 07:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC) Unfortunately in my view there's...
Click to read more »Delete - Nothing found. IMDB is absolutely not a reliable source per WP:CITEIMDB, Google only gave me social media sites Google Books only gave me a bunch...
Click to read more »useful as an external link as much of the content is user generated. See WP:CITEIMDB. What's really needed here are professional film reviewers that have reviewed...
Click to read more »considering the dearth of sources). Generally IMDb isn't considered a WP:RS - WP:CITEIMDB. mikeman67 (talk) 15:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC) Sorry. I don't. It was shown...
Click to read more »both of which are either IMDB or self-published, which is against WP:CITEIMDB and WP:SELFPUB as established Wikipedia essays or policies. Google Books...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) listal.com appears to be a simple mirror of IMDb, and the WP:CITEIMDB essay discourages using IMDb to source "Cast lists, etc. for films and...
Click to read more »has been widely been regarded as an unsuitable source for years. See WP:CITEIMDB. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 00:23, 25 March 2018 (UTC) Delete per the above...
Click to read more »what they've done and produced by a decent website (don't use IMDB - WP:CITEIMDB), but ultimately it's a list of shows without context. What their role...
Click to read more »article, and it is IMDb, which should not be used as a source anyway per WP:CITEIMDB. There are EXTERNAL LINKS which are not citations, and they are all just...
Click to read more »for involvement in acting and puppetry. Disputed citation removed per WP:CITEIMDB.JuggrnautTN (talk) 21:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)— JuggrnautTN (talk • contribs)...
Click to read more »nominated for two other Emmy awards. As sourced in the links below. As per WP:CITEIMDB IMDB *CAN* be also be used as a secondary and tertiary source of other...
Click to read more »it's a more visual-fronted system that aids readers, but whatever. WP:CITEIMDB; since awards are not user-editable, it is in the "meh" section. There...
Click to read more »considered a reliable source since it is user-generated + the WP essay WP:CITEIMDB + WP:EL/P#IMDb. Shearonink (talk) 22:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC) The SAG...
Click to read more »reliable sources (with some exceptions). More details can be found at WP:CITEIMDB and WP:ELP. Some asides: Why are all the citations from within the article...
Click to read more »her work on Dog Eat Dog are not referenced. Even taking into account WP:CITEIMDB, the film is not listed on De Fonseca's page there, either. Similar edits...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) "IMDB is a reliable source [...]." No it is not. Please see WP:CITEIMDB. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 13:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC) You took that out...
Click to read more »onto the talk page of the editor to reiterate the points re: WP:RS and WP:CITEIMDB? I think the note placed on the IP's talk page is enough at this point...
Click to read more »citation to acknowledge this. Most of the "disputed uses" listed on WP:CITEIMDB (such as cast list, character names and so on) can also be verified from...
Click to read more »rating certifications on IMDb could be used as reliable sources, see WP:CITEIMDB All that said, I'll keep working on this article so we reach a consensus...
Click to read more »may ask experienced editors here too. Also you may wish to go through WP:CITEIMDB though, to ensure that the article is not deleted again due to lack of...
Click to read more »wikiproject-essay you mentioned, also points to a standalone-essay WP:CITEIMDB#Appropriate_uses, which suggests that MPAA ratings and WGA-trademark-annotated...
Click to read more »of general help to you. Don't use imdb or social media as sources (WP:CITEIMDB and WP:TWITTER). Per AlloCiné you probably shouldn't use that either. It...
Click to read more »at WP:CITEIMDB is very helpful, I found it enlightening. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 15:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC) @MistyGraceWhite, according to WP:CITEIMDB, I believe...
Click to read more »absolutely nothing to do with the actress, and the last two sources fail WP:CITEIMDB. This proves that she isn't notable in any way. 🌴Koridas🌴 (Negotiate)...
Click to read more »it. Here are some discussions that may help: [2][3], or this essay: WP:CITEIMDB.- MrX 21:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC) MrX, thank you for the reply and the information...
Click to read more »it is not considered a reliable source for Wikipedia. See the essay WP:CITEIMDB. Schmidt, Michael Q. 20:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC) Makes sense, thanks for...
Click to read more »by an editor saying IMDB is reliable but isn't reliable either per WP:CITEIMDB. Fails GNG and BIO. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:13, 17...
Click to read more »both of which are either IMDB or self-published, which is against WP:CITEIMDB and WP:SELFPUB as established Wikipedia essays or policies. Google Books...
Click to read more »and Catrat999: you can read what part of IMDb is user generated here: WP:CITEIMDB. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 10:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC) Hi, Finnusertop...
Click to read more »Delete - No sources except for IMDB, which is not a reliable source per WP:CITEIMDB. Koridas talk? 06:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC) Delete As i already tagged it...
Click to read more »unreliable. Here's an explanation: 1. Cites a Google search, not reliable 2. WP:CITEIMDB 3. Page is just a collection of his books with no biographical information...
Click to read more »of the content is copied and pasted from IMBD, with scant regard for WP:CITEIMDB the author hasn't even bothered to paraphrase. Just compare the first sentence...
Click to read more »article, and it is IMDb, which should not be used as a source anyway per WP:CITEIMDB. There are EXTERNAL LINKS which are not citations, and they are all just...
Click to read more »considering the dearth of sources). Generally IMDb isn't considered a WP:RS - WP:CITEIMDB. mikeman67 (talk) 15:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC) Sorry. I don't. It was shown...
Click to read more »provide feedback. Dflaw4 (talk) 07:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC) Delete - per WP:CITEIMDB. 🌺Kori🌺 - (@) 07:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC) Unfortunately in my view there's...
Click to read more »has been widely been regarded as an unsuitable source for years. See WP:CITEIMDB. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 00:23, 25 March 2018 (UTC) Delete per the above...
Click to read more »2018 (UTC) Delete per the above. A note that IMDB is not a WP:RS, per WP:CITEIMDB. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »rating certifications on IMDb could be used as reliable sources, see WP:CITEIMDB All that said, I'll keep working on this article so we reach a consensus...
Click to read more »Delete - Nothing found. IMDB is absolutely not a reliable source per WP:CITEIMDB, Google only gave me social media sites Google Books only gave me a bunch...
Click to read more »considered a reliable source since it is user-generated + the WP essay WP:CITEIMDB + WP:EL/P#IMDb. Shearonink (talk) 22:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC) The SAG...
Click to read more »05:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC) Strong delete, only one "source" which fails WP:CITEIMDB. dibbydib (T ･ C) 05:49, 21 April 2020 (UTC) Keep. I've added some content...
Click to read more »in pretty bad shape, bordering either on WP:OR or WP:FANCRUFT, and WP:CITEIMDB, which are not good. Bluesphere 08:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »for involvement in acting and puppetry. Disputed citation removed per WP:CITEIMDB.JuggrnautTN (talk) 21:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)— JuggrnautTN (talk • contribs)...
Click to read more »reliable sources (with some exceptions). More details can be found at WP:CITEIMDB and WP:ELP. Some asides: Why are all the citations from within the article...
Click to read more »nominated for two other Emmy awards. As sourced in the links below. As per WP:CITEIMDB IMDB *CAN* be also be used as a secondary and tertiary source of other...
Click to read more »opinion about IMDb was originally formed. I guess I should take this to WP:CITEIMDB and WP:RS/IMDB 009o9 (talk) 19:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC) Oops, just realized...
Click to read more »problems - the largest of which is that it cites no reliable sources (see WP:CITEIMDB), so it may not last long in article space before being deleted. I recommend...
Click to read more »it's a more visual-fronted system that aids readers, but whatever. WP:CITEIMDB; since awards are not user-editable, it is in the "meh" section. There...
Click to read more »prohibited since it is a user generated database and thus unreliable, as per WP:CITEIMDB. I checked that BOM is frequently cited in film articles and there is no...
Click to read more »can be a problematic source. But we do have a long-standing essay, WP:CITEIMDB that lists several inappropriate uses for IMDB, several appropriate uses...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) listal.com appears to be a simple mirror of IMDb, and the WP:CITEIMDB essay discourages using IMDb to source "Cast lists, etc. for films and...
Click to read more »prohibited since it is a user generated database and thus unreliable, as per WP:CITEIMDB. I checked that BOM is frequently cited in film articles and there is no...
Click to read more »to recheck if IMDB is an acceptable source for filmography. Reading WP:CITEIMDB, I would veer toward having filmography be sourced from here. Will be good...
Click to read more »article created in Wikipedia. ~2026-25300-33 (talk) 17:55, 25 April 2026 (UTC) See WP:CITEIMDB. 🏳️🌈JohnLaurens333 (Ping me!) 18:45, 25 April 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »a source outside of very limited situations, and never use the bio. WP:CITEIMDB Ravensfire (talk) 13:22, 17 July 2026 (UTC) I think we're all in violent...
Click to read more »useful as an external link as much of the content is user generated. See WP:CITEIMDB. What's really needed here are professional film reviewers that have reviewed...
Click to read more »contribs 15:01, 14 January 2026 (UTC) Also, as a general question, in WP:CITEIMDB, I didn't clearly understand if we could cite it when stating the general...
Click to read more »what they've done and produced by a decent website (don't use IMDB - WP:CITEIMDB), but ultimately it's a list of shows without context. What their role...
Click to read more »