Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Shortcuts WP:CFD/WWP:CFD/W WP:CFDWWP:CFDW If process guidelines are met, move categories to the appropriate section here to prepare to delete. Before deleting...
Click to read more »college football project will often use the College Football Data Warehouse (CFDW) as the project editors consider it a reliable source. This database is linked...
Click to read more »Chicago Tribune (reviewing CFDW's findings on the use of interim head coaches), The Montgomery Advertiser (dscussing CFDW's use of the National Championship...
Click to read more »Estimated number of pages affected: It depends, how many pages are listed on WP:CFDW. Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes Function...
Click to read more »AutoWikiBrowsers CfD plugin to recategorise or remove categories listed at WP:CFDW, if the other bots don't do it. Don't we already have 6 CfD bots? →Σσς. (Sigma)...
Click to read more »rights. Mr.Z-man 02:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC) The listing format at Wikipedia:CFDW could easily be modified to accommodate custom bot edit summaries if that...
Click to read more »approval for implementing the results of CFD debates as entered on Wikipedia:CFDW (a page which, I might add, is only editable by administrators). However...
Click to read more »the extra space and will replace the CFDW references later today. –Grondemar 19:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC) The CFDW references have been replaced as requested...
Click to read more »to delete categories or recategorize based on instructions at Wikipedia:CFDW. I will also be able to do some tasks which normally would require manual...
Click to read more »12:40, 22 September 2019 (UTC) Steven Crossin, is this still relevant? WP:CFDW should work the same even if consensus was obtained at RM instead of CFD...
Click to read more »Automatic Programming language(s): Python Source code available: cfd.py cfdw.py Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): WP:BOTREQ#Categories...
Click to read more »its owner to delete categories or recategorize based on instructions at WP:CFDW. Botastic is able to do some tasks which normally would require manual editing...
Click to read more »redirects as well (I'm mostly concerned with those created by Wikipedia:CFDW-related talk page moves which I have to fix manually at this time). --S up...
Click to read more »Yes Function details: As a non-administrator, I am not allowed to use WP:CFDW when closing CFD discussions. Currently I use Cat-a-lot to rename, merge...
Click to read more »program a bot to implement the change; non-admins can request this at WT:CFDW. Alternatively, these are four easy steps to move a small category without...
Click to read more »14:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC) ok, instead of using your sandbox, why not use CFDW when listing, that way all the bots work from the same place. βcommand 14:41...
Click to read more »sources as being independent?--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:35, 29 June 2011 (UTC) CFDW doesn't count towards notability at all, it gives routine coverage for all...
Click to read more »orphaning is needed, or CfD discussions where the non-admin can post at WT:CFDW) Protecting or unprotecting a page Merging page histories Either imposing...
Click to read more »those actions, or to get help from an admin e.g. by listing the close at WT:CFDW. User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/CFDlister is frequently used for this purpose. Manual...
Click to read more »For instance see User:Cyde/CFDW, which I use for testing on occasion. Note that it has the same format as normal WP:CFDW. So the closer of this nomination...
Click to read more »a nail in the coffin of CFDW on Wikipedia, and people will celebrate that Wikipedia policies prevailed and therefore that CFDW suffered a deserved fate...
Click to read more »deleting the state category - simply create the city category, list it at WP:CFDW, and once the bot is done delist it and move the 8 back manually. This method...
Click to read more »(I also have an idea for setting up the account for certain kinds of WP:CFDW problems, so I'll leave the account's userpage as it is for now.) Courcelles...
Click to read more »Jweiss11 (talk) 07:05, 27 February 2013 (UTC) While I respect the research of CFDW in evaluating the selections of the selectors (a "superselector" if you will...
Click to read more »flag log · user rights) Implements WP:CFD decisions from WP:CFD/W Code: cfdw.py on GitHub Runs on Toolforge in the jjmc89-bot tool. Legobot (BRFA · contribs ·...
Click to read more »manually, or an admin has agreed to help you, e.g. to pick up listings at WT:CFDW. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:20, 6 October 2021 (UTC) @Mikehawk10: I have listed...
Click to read more »more efficient for admins. Non-admins have to route everything through WT:CFDW, which adds extra coordination and slows the processing of even straightforward...
Click to read more »a nail in the coffin of CFDW on Wikipedia, and people will celebrate that Wikipedia policies prevailed and therefore that CFDW suffered a deserved fate...
Click to read more »happened ... but I see that actually Good Ol’factory added[2] this cat to WP:CFDW as one that had been missed ... but unfortunately, they misinterpreted the...
Click to read more »Chicago Tribune (reviewing CFDW's findings on the use of interim head coaches), The Montgomery Advertiser (dscussing CFDW's use of the National Championship...
Click to read more »would be sufficient to make a list and feed it to user:JJMC89's bot via WP:CFDW; I think that will move the categories even if they are not tagged. – Fayenatic...
Click to read more »For instance see User:Cyde/CFDW, which I use for testing on occasion. Note that it has the same format as normal WP:CFDW. So the closer of this nomination...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC) Then they can be renamed en masse on CFDW/Large. As far as I can tell, there are only six templates that need changing:...
Click to read more »whose result has basically been telegraphed to the bots by way of the WP:CFDW page. --Cyde Weys 14:53, 25 August 2007 (UTC) Fair enough. Just for reference...
Click to read more »the nomination's formatting as close as possible to the syntax used at WP:CFDW. That used to mean listing each cat as [[Category:A]], not {{cl|A}}. I dunno...
Click to read more »contribs) 22:29, 12 January 2008 see WP:CFDW βcommand 04:40, 13 January 2008 (UTC) Only problem is that WP:CFDW is fully protected! Thus, only admins can...
Click to read more »sure all pages are updated, or admin permissions to activate the bot at WP:CFDW. I would recommend that you wait a bit before closing CfDs. They're often...
Click to read more »"keep". [3] 00:58, 3 May 2020: Bibliomaniac15 list the categories at WP:CFDW#Retain, so that the bot will untag the categories. [4]: 01:17, 3 May 2020...
Click to read more »tedious, mind-numbing work, and I hate it every time I see a job listed at WP:CFDW that uses categorization via passed template parameters, because they're...
Click to read more »you don't have access to CFDW, that I quit closing because of it. --Trialpears (talk) 08:08, 5 November 2020 (UTC) re CFDW, perhaps Danny's...
Click to read more »Everything that was moved to CFDW has been processed; we have 415 open requests, and many of these can be moved to CFDW. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:46, 24...
Click to read more »I'll do that with the ones that I come across when cleaning up after WP:CFDW. – Fayenatic London 22:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC) Could you do it for the rest...
Click to read more »asking for is people to close discussions (part of which is adding to the CFDW page). I'd help (I used to do it a lot), but atm I just don't seem to have...
Click to read more »"keep". [97] 00:58, 3 May 2020: Bibliomaniac15 list the categories at WP:CFDW#Retain, so that the bot will untag the categories. [98]: 01:17, 3 May 2020...
Click to read more »[[:Category:Television series by Disney-ABC Domestic Television]] from WP:CFDW. At the time of nominating this for speedy renaming I didn't notice, that...
Click to read more »the move is approved- or no one objects in a week- it'll be lsited on WP:CFDW and Cydebot will move the categories. We have this process for a reason....
Click to read more »separate discussion on that topic instead of blindly deleting pages. However, CFDW indeed DOES meet the criteria on WP:SPS because it is neither a "self-published...
Click to read more »been no objection, so we can put all of the subcategories of these through CFDW without cluttering up the nomination pages. I've created a list of the affected...
Click to read more »-RunningOnBrains(talk) 22:43, 3 April 2012 (UTC) You're probably looking for WP:CFDW, where Cydebot (talk · contribs) would create the new categories, populating...
Click to read more »Cydebot, I think. Guettarda (talk) 22:52, 2 March 2015 (UTC) Nearly. WP:CFDW as you run round your computer three times counter-clockwise singing "we...
Click to read more »wasn't processed automatically. Please add the 5 nominated categories to WP:CFDW, so that a bot can handle the request. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:33, 11 February...
Click to read more »for quite some time now as a reliable source. A further explanation of the CFDW as a reliable source can be found here. You may want to link to College Football...
Click to read more »what a CFD merge has meant for the last 13 years. The section heading at WP:CFDW is Move/merge, then_delete; In 2006 it was Move/Merge and delete. Your idea...
Click to read more »consensus for a change, the closer instructs a bot to do the work (at WP:CFDW). --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC) You...
Click to read more »(UTC) There is a significant backlog of CFDs to close: see the list at WP:CFDW. From what I have observed, not many admins are closing CFDs lately. In a...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) @Qwerfjkl: he means e.g. [1]. When categories are listed at WP:CFDW for bot processing, I check "what links here" after the move, and fix red...
Click to read more »restored it and placed it here as it is populated and was not placed at CFDW. This is a procedural nom and I have no opinion regarding disposition. After...
Click to read more »it perfectly on its own? I guess you weren't around before Cydebot but WP:CFDW would frequently get weeks of backup. There was an overwhelmingly large amount...
Click to read more »in fact, I used to run AMbot to do this for CFD closes. When I checked WP:CFDW however, I saw that Cydebot was the only one listed as still active. If Cydebot...
Click to read more »which would put me under obligation to enact your closes I disagree with. WT:CFDW#NACs is not a policy.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Adding...
Click to read more »The CFDW, the annually VMI bomb, and the 2010 VMI Football Record book, are not newspapers by any stretch of the word. I have not stated that the CFDW is...
Click to read more »explanation of how/why this was nominated may help. I was tidying up at WP:CFDW, where bots and others implement the decisions at CfD, and saw that Category:Jewish...
Click to read more »This page is to be used when the categories being processed will affect at least 5,000 pages. Smaller categories should be processed at WP:CFDW....
Click to read more »reversals of your bot's edits starting from [2]? See [3] for the instruction at CFDW for deaths from 1 to 599 BC. – Fayenatic London 21:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »main article. Otto4711 (talk) 16:41, 28 June 2008 (UTC) Subcats added to WP:CFDW for deletion, so delete the parent category: as Otto says, unnecessary for...
Click to read more »of you be able to make that happen? It is currently listed at WP:CFDW (not WT:CFDW) and the bot is refusing to do it because doing so would populate...
Click to read more »January 2022 (UTC) SilkTork should not have listed the categories at WP:CFDW since manual work is required. (See bolded note at the top of the bot work...
Click to read more »separate discussion on that topic instead of blindly deleting pages. However, CFDW indeed DOES meet the criteria on WP:SPS because it is neither a "self-published...
Click to read more »talkpage) has a bot that can help with the tagging and then the bots at WP:CFDW can deal with the actual move afterwards. Probably the simplest way to handle...
Click to read more »There is somewhat of a backlog in the closing of these discussions: see WP:CFDW. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:55, 13 December 2010 (UTC) The above is preserved...
Click to read more »convention on botops, to the extent that it has any practical effects (given TFD/CFDW/patrol bots), is a social construct rather than a technical limitation, right...
Click to read more »two other categories; if he does, he'll list them for bot processing at WP:CFDW, and if he doesn't, you'll need another CfD (possibly a speedy nomination...
Click to read more »CFD admin bot runs off of entries placed on the fully-protected page WP:CFDW, so it's only accepting input from admins anyway. --Cyde Weys 21:08, 17 July...
Click to read more »closures (not that I'm complaining about the incredibly helpful admins at WT:CFDW who have implemented my closures), and I think this might help. I realise...
Click to read more »to effectively process closed CfDs, an editor needs to be able to edit WP:CFDW, and that page is typically protected to allow only admins to edit it.) The...
Click to read more »taken to WP:CFDW so be renamed and (usually) deleted by Cydebot (talk · contribs). When admins delete categories that are listed at CFDW, it's usually...
Click to read more »template orphaning, etc), with a common protected workpage similar to WP:CFDW. – Train2104 (t • c) 20:22, 6 April 2017 (UTC) Support, double namespace...
Click to read more »backlog where I was not conflicted. The recent page history of CFDAC and WP:CFDW show this. I closed 6 in fairly quick succession on the July 6 page, tackling...
Click to read more »watchlist, checked and found that it was G4 eligible and so added it to WP:CFDW for bot emptying and deletion (because that's a lot easier than manually...
Click to read more »taken to WP:CFDW so be renamed and (usually) deleted by Cydebot (talk · contribs). When admins delete categories that are listed at CFDW, it's usually...
Click to read more »participation of this discussion before sending the categories off to WP:CFDW, just to make sure I haven't made a mistake or overlooked any detail. — ξxplicit...
Click to read more »Aszx5000 (talk) 16:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC) Aszx5000, they are listed on WT:CFDW and will be handled by admins there. — Qwerfjkltalk 17:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »February 2022 (UTC) EDIT: Already done by Ymblanter (talk · contribs) via WP:CFDW. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC) Moved from Wikipedia:Bot...
Click to read more »2026 (UTC) Comment I forgot to mention that this cannot be handled thru WP:CFDW because it is populated by a template with a category-setting parameter....
Click to read more »backlog where I was not conflicted. The recent page history of CFDAC and WP:CFDW show this. I closed 6 in fairly quick succession on the July 6 page, tackling...
Click to read more »Wikidata. This was presumably why Timrollpickering listed the close at WP:CFDW, so that the bot would move the category pages. Unfortunately this had the...
Click to read more »propagate, the nominated categories can be listed for bot processing at CFDW. – Fayenatic London 15:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC) Support. The pages to be...
Click to read more »watchlist, checked and found that it was G4 eligible and so added it to WP:CFDW for bot emptying and deletion (because that's a lot easier than manually...
Click to read more »This is being emptied by the bots even as we speak, as I added it to WP:CFDW a little while ago, and it will then be deleted. Create-protection can then...
Click to read more »for quite some time now as a reliable source. A further explanation of the CFDW as a reliable source can be found here. You may want to link to College Football...
Click to read more »For future reference large retain lists like this can just be listed at WT:CFDW - the bot can handle them. However, @LaundryPizza03: I really don't see a...
Click to read more »speedily renamed to Category:Ancient law, and I adjusted the listing at WT:CFDW accordingly. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 15:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC) The following...
Click to read more »HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 16:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Closed and listed at WP:CFDW. Staraction (talk · contribs) 13:30, 14 August 2026 (UTC) Completed - (Initiated...
Click to read more »the extra space and will replace the CFDW references later today. –Grondemar 19:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC) The CFDW references have been replaced as requested...
Click to read more »been no objection, so we can put all of the subcategories of these through CFDW without cluttering up the nomination pages. I've created February 7 Category:Web...
Click to read more »{{#ifexist}} on the category outputs. In fact, the closer should not list these at CFDW and instead delete them directly; the contents will be automatically emptied...
Click to read more »more efficient for admins. Non-admins have to route everything through WT:CFDW, which adds extra coordination and slows the processing of even straightforward...
Click to read more »been tagged, and had been segregated, They should not have been copied to CFDW (and hand changed), and the CfD tags for a completely different week removed...
Click to read more »would have been to request implementing the forgotten April discussion at WT:CFDW, not starting a new one. * Pppery * in solidarity 22:59, 20 July 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Done ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 19:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC) @Nyttend: WP:CFDW can handle these in the future – just link to the old CFD :) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)...
Click to read more »take a bit before something is moved from WT:CFDW (where non-admins list closes) to the fully protected WP:CFDW for bot implementation. You can check that...
Click to read more »actual person who added the G6 tag was the nominator, who preempted the WT:CFDW listing). * Pppery * it has begun... 04:45, 9 August 2025 (UTC) Endorse as...
Click to read more »team (page 152) Missing a (practice) game vs. Seattle High School listed at CFDW and elsewhere. Lists a game vs. the crew of the USS Chicago (1885). Contemporary...
Click to read more »to @Queen of Hearts and Pppery (as participants in the discussion at WT:CFDW) and @AHI-3000, Marcocapelle, Smasongarrison, and Nederlandse Leeuw (as participants...
Click to read more »non-admin-actionable delete closures. (Either depopulate the category, or list at WT:CFDW or WP:CFDWM. That said, I ran into a problem once with renaming a category...
Click to read more »@Estopedist1, I only just closed these discussion and listed them at WT:CFDW. They may take a few days to be processed by admins. PLease withdraw this...
Click to read more »are listed for processing at WP:CFDW, has become backlogged. Any admin is invited to move the listed procedures to WP:CFDW, where they will be processed...
Click to read more »"processing" refer to closing or the activities pertaining to it? Use WP:CFDW to list outcomes that can be automated by a bot. You can also use Cat-a-lot...
Click to read more »@Cremastra: thank you! Normally things need to be fed to the bot via WP:CFDW (and non-admins make requests to do so at its talk page). In this case, because...
Click to read more »template edit to clear the last few pages from the category, and then the CFDW bot will delete it. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »try to keep up to date with tricky cases of category moves listed at WP:CFDW, but lately the large volume of Speedy renamings has made this difficult...
Click to read more »it's unfortunate how many obscure understaffed admin queues there are (WT:CFDW, another one I'm involved in, is backed up by a month), but my comment above...
Click to read more »– Jonesey95 (talk) 21:51, 25 September 2023 (UTC) Yeah, and as one of CFDW's two regular admins (Ymblanter being the other one - echoing Jonesey95's...
Click to read more »resolved after the closure. The page has not yet been deleted through WP:CFDW, so I am not sure if WP:DRV can be used. At the time of nomination on April...
Click to read more »closed on May 1–10 or May 24–31, listing merge/rename/delete outcomes at WT:CFDW. The first category I encountered, Category:Fictional statues, I emptied...
Click to read more »mistakes sometimes, so if it hasn't been actioned and isn't listed at WT:CFDW feel free to come yell at me on my talk page :D. GoldRomean (talk) 18:10...
Click to read more »(UTC) Not even to mention CFD, where admins are desperately needed. WT:CFDW's been backlogged for like a month straight. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I...
Click to read more »actual person who added the G6 tag was the nominator, who preempted the WT:CFDW listing). * Pppery * it has begun... 04:45, 9 August 2025 (UTC) Endorse as...
Click to read more »