This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
it might be best included in our encyclopedia. Shortcuts WP:CANTFIXWP:CANTFIX WP:WONTWORKWP:WONTWORK WP:DON'T PRESERVEWP:DON'T PRESERVE Several of our...
Click to read more »is an insurmountable problem per WP:CANTFIX.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC) What part of WP:CANTFIX are you referring to here? That appears...
Click to read more »deletionn, per WP:PRESERVE. Warden (talk) 12:09, 9 March 2013 (UTC) WP:CANTFIX Bg9989 (talk) 12:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC) You seem to be a new editor and...
Click to read more »deletion, per WP:PRESERVE. Warden (talk) 12:10, 9 March 2013 (UTC) WP:CANTFIX Bg9989 (talk) 12:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC) WP:VAGUEWAVE. An encyclopedic source...
Click to read more »but argues for deletion anyway. However, unless this were a case of WP:CANTFIX, which it isn't, WP:IMPERFECT does not argue for deletion but fixing through...
Click to read more »there was little hope for their eventual improvement as they were (WP:CANTFIX, the section just after WP:PRESERVE, makes that point). (See also WP:NOTPLOT...
Click to read more »WP:SYNthesis of various observations users have gleaned from movies. WP:CANTFIX so delete. Shooterwalker (talk) 04:22, 10 August 2011 (UTC) Delete What's...
Click to read more »(UTC) If NLIST is met and there's no other outstanding concerns that we WP:CANTFIX, then IMO per WP:IMPERFECT the article should be kept and improved upon...
Click to read more »unneccesarily bitey toward newcomers, and NOTHING in the article fell under WP:CANTFIX. A better result is that the newcomers whom you feel might be too interested...
Click to read more »fix, NOT delete. Whatever Cwobeel did may not be a good example of WP:CANTFIX policy. --George Ho (talk) 18:55, 21 November 2014 (UTC) If you are a named...
Click to read more »your boilerplate, blind preservation is not out editing policy (see WP:CANTFIX). HrafnTalkStalk(P) 13:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC) Keep. The article is an...
Click to read more »banner was added to request citations. The converse of PRESERVE is WP:CANTFIX which talks about "situations when it might be more appropriate to remove...
Click to read more »that TRIVIA is about section layout, not content policy. Violating WP:CANTFIX and WP:PRESERVE ad infinitum after having been made aware Citing WP:NOTNEWS...
Click to read more »by WP:CANTFIX. I strongly suspect that, most of the time, when an editor appears to be "ignoring" PRESERVE, he/she is actually "following" CANTFIX.) Blueboar...
Click to read more »into even greater detail about how and why we operate this way, and WP:CANTFIX spells this out even more clearly. Don't nuke content that is fixable....
Click to read more »practice did not begin with Cindy's edit--so the article did not meet WP:CANTFIX. Calling it an instance of WP:SPEEDY is 99% accurate, so I'm sticking to...
Click to read more »that it hews pretty close to WP:Editing policy. WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM and WP:CANTFIX sum up what to do and not do in more or less the same way as this proposal...
Click to read more »However the WMF has indicated that some of these rendering problems are CANTFIX or WONTFIX. They hope to address the common cases, and their goal is to...
Click to read more »without any improvement between nominations is taken as evidence that we WP:CANTFIX the article. I'd personally like to see us handle "no consensus" better...
Click to read more »the issue is as ICPH points out below that no one fixes it, and per WP:CANTFIX when this is the case it might justify removal from article space. Most...
Click to read more »15:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC) Thanks, but no point if this is a RESOLVED CANTFIX or whatever :-) Nyttend (talk) 21:48, 17 October 2015 (UTC) Lately, I've...
Click to read more »corrected in the current version of the software then it should be called "CANTFIX". --Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:36, 30 October 2009 (UTC) Hmm, that would just...
Click to read more »WP:PRESERVE Warden fails to acknowledge is that our FULL editing policy at WP:CANTFIX explicitly calls for the removal of "material that is fundamentally inappropriate...
Click to read more »When we say deletion is a last resort, that comes out of the policy; WP:CANTFIX. Keeping it around so we can work out what to eventually do with it comes...
Click to read more »is an insurmountable problem per WP:CANTFIX.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC) What part of WP:CANTFIX are you referring to here? That appears...
Click to read more »deletionn, per WP:PRESERVE. Warden (talk) 12:09, 9 March 2013 (UTC) WP:CANTFIX Bg9989 (talk) 12:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC) You seem to be a new editor and...
Click to read more »your boilerplate, blind preservation is not out editing policy (see WP:CANTFIX). HrafnTalkStalk(P) 13:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC) Keep. The article is an...
Click to read more »unneccesarily bitey toward newcomers, and NOTHING in the article fell under WP:CANTFIX. A better result is that the newcomers whom you feel might be too interested...
Click to read more »WP:SYNthesis of various observations users have gleaned from movies. WP:CANTFIX so delete. Shooterwalker (talk) 04:22, 10 August 2011 (UTC) Delete What's...
Click to read more »practice did not begin with Cindy's edit--so the article did not meet WP:CANTFIX. Calling it an instance of WP:SPEEDY is 99% accurate, so I'm sticking to...
Click to read more »WP:PRESERVE. My !vote stands. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:25, 23 October 2021 (UTC) WP:CANTFIX is part of WP:PRESERVE. Even the first version has the problem that it's...
Click to read more »WP:PRESERVE Warden fails to acknowledge is that our FULL editing policy at WP:CANTFIX explicitly calls for the removal of "material that is fundamentally inappropriate...
Click to read more »but argues for deletion anyway. However, unless this were a case of WP:CANTFIX, which it isn't, WP:IMPERFECT does not argue for deletion but fixing through...
Click to read more »WP:PRESERVE. My !vote stands. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:25, 23 October 2021 (UTC) WP:CANTFIX is part of WP:PRESERVE. Even the first version has the problem that it's...
Click to read more »into even greater detail about how and why we operate this way, and WP:CANTFIX spells this out even more clearly. Don't nuke content that is fixable....
Click to read more »When we say deletion is a last resort, that comes out of the policy; WP:CANTFIX. Keeping it around so we can work out what to eventually do with it comes...
Click to read more »Macosal (talk) 13:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC) A subsection of PRESERVE, WP:CANTFIX, states that "Special care needs to be taken with biographies of living...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:38, 8 September 2014 (UTC) It's been described here as more CANTFIX than WONTFIX, but I'll let someone who understands the reasons explain...
Click to read more »convincingly rebut it. You cite WP:V and WP:NPOV, clearly referring to WP:CANTFIX, but CANTFIX is about situations when it might be more appropriate to remove information...
Click to read more »." No, Möller, VE is still an issue, which you apparently WONTFIX. Or CANTFIX, whatever. You still haven't explained how ensuring we can provide a user...
Click to read more »and I see no reason to address the strawmen arguments presented. Per WP:CANTFIX, PRESERVE is beholden to other policies including WP:NPOV and WP:V. The...
Click to read more »policy he or she is advocating. Also in the section beneath PRESERVE is WP:CANTFIX which states, "What Wikipedia is not describes material that is fundamentally...
Click to read more »convincingly rebut it. You cite WP:V and WP:NPOV, clearly referring to WP:CANTFIX, but CANTFIX is about situations when it might be more appropriate to remove information...
Click to read more »whatsoever, so starting fresh seems to be the best option at this point. WP:CANTFIX applies: Several of our core policies discuss situations when it might...
Click to read more »is a violation of core WP policies, and cannot simply be fixed, per WP:CANTFIX. Notability is again a core concept, a concept which GWA88 does not seem...
Click to read more »that currently, it's WP:PRESERVE that points to WP:BURDEN, since its WP:CANTFIX subsection links to WP:V for how to handle unsourced material. This implies...
Click to read more »(UTC) If NLIST is met and there's no other outstanding concerns that we WP:CANTFIX, then IMO per WP:IMPERFECT the article should be kept and improved upon...
Click to read more »