immediate blocking. Shortcuts WP:BLPRSWP:BLPRS WP:BLPSOURCESWP:BLPSOURCES WP:BLPSOURCEWP:BLPSOURCE Wikipedia's sourcing policy, Verifiability, says that all...

inline citations to reference the content properly" doesn't match WP:BLPSOURCES. -- Rybec (Declined) Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/North Queensland...

for creation/Amit Shekhar  Fail - Many uncited statements that fail WP:BLPSOURCES (e.g. "He travels across india for his motivational training,often emphasizes...

Fenix down (talk) 15:35, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Speedy Delete: Per WP:BLPSOURCES, unreferenced BLP fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk)...

article was removed as being gossip sourced to tabloids contrary to WP:BLPSOURCES. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC) Redirect to Amschel...

Wizards (talk) 20:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:V, WP:GNG, WP:BLPSOURCES --—— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 18:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC) The above...

have added the one source I can find to The Independent that passes WP:BLPSOURCES and brought the discussion here. Your thoughts, please. Ritchie333 (talk)...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not so notable per WP:NACTOR and fails WP:BLPSOURCES. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 20:51, 7 October 2016 (UTC) Delete: Zero search results that...

fails WP:DIRECTOR and WP:N. References given or found on the web fails WP:BLPSOURCES. Jim Carter 09:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

tabloid journalism and is disparaging and gossipy, severely violating WP:BLPSOURCES. However, I still don't think it meets the letter of CSD G10, which is...

worked on are unsourced which causes concern under WP:BLP, especially WP:BLPSOURCES. The one source given leads to Facebook. Although apparently an official...

indication of significant coverage being found, or improvements to the the blpsources, other than adding two references from a music blog. WikiVirusC(talk)...

unanimously) and NBOX (unanimously). However, by strength of argument, BLPSOURCES is not met, HEYMANN has not occurred, and therefore according to cited...

based on a one-sided court document (or equivalent thereof). Tagged for BLPsources for over a year. Searching for independent reliable sources resulted in...

considered notable, but without reliable sources it is impossible to meet WP:BLPSOURCES policy. Concerning the misspelling of Engineer, I suggest that if this...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLPSOURCES--There are none. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:02, 13 May 2012 (UTC) Comment. It...

may be subject to Deletion if reliable sources are not provided per WP:BLPSOURCES. --Animalparty-- (talk) 21:45, 12 April 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC) Delete Top news hit is the WP:BLPSOURCES-violating Daily Star and it just goes downhill from there. Unsalvageable...

celebrity, largely cited to tabloid journalism thus completely violating WP:BLPSOURCES. Couldn't find anything in broadsheet sources; a search for sources seems...

@Dclemens1971 I get that, but that is not the cogent policy here. WP:BLPSOURCES external to notability policy but equally important is at play here. We...

won't read about in broadsheet newspapers. The sources are typical WP:BLPSOURCES violating tabloid fodder, and a search for alternatives reveals the same...

Mgm|(talk) 19:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC) It came from me :-) but is based on {{BLPsources}} and copies the text from there. I have no problem with changing the...

the coverage about the subject. Article doesn't even pass through WP:BLPSOURCES criteria. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 17:55, 20 April 2014 (UTC) Note: This...

/What? 17:30, 30 April 2012 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BLPSOURCES. Probable WP:COI and promotion. No in-line sources provided. External...

clean up. Insomesia (talk) 02:31, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:BLPSOURCES. The references given are either: dead links [1] [2], trivial blog mentions...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:BLPSOURCES. Page created over a decade ago, no sources have been attached nor can...

may be acceptable over on IMDB it is not acceptable here. Finally, WP:BLPSOURCES states "This policy extends that principle, adding that contentious material...

nothing to the quality of those already identified as not satisfying WP:BLPSOURCES by AleatoryPonderings, unfortunately. ——Serial 16:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)...

references (which would be enough to replace the "unsourced" tag with "BLPsources"). Other concerns remain.--Plad2 (talk) 07:19, 17 December 2010 (UTC)...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) BLPsources-tagged for two years. Failure of WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. Games in Europe...

no WP:RS to justify the statement. What awards? Presended by? Fails WP:BLPSOURCES with no in-line source at all. All of the books listed with Davies as...

that's all the sources are, listings, but nothing that ammounts to WP:BLPSOURCES. And for someone who is apparently so notable, no substantial Ghits. A...

in any way. - Nabla (talk) 14:26, 4 July 2015 (UTC) User:Betacommand/blpsource (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:STALEDRAFT - since 2010...

the subject, so fails WP:SIGCOV. As a BLP it needs to comply with WP:BLPSOURCES. It does not, relying as it does on primary sources, in breach of WP:PTS...

published, except a list of articles attributed to her (trouble with WP:BLPSOURCES). Thus subject of the article fails WP:NACADEMICS since she has not won...

the third does not source the claim or mention the subject. Needs WP:BLPSOURCES to meet verifiability criteria. At this time it fails to meet our WP:GNG...

(talk) 21:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC) Draftify or delete per WP:ANYBIO and BLPSOURCES. Why was this accepted at NPR? Perhaps they know of sources we don't?...

there's no substantive treatment in any source reliable enough for WP:BLPSOURCES, so WP:GNG fails. FourViolas (talk) 04:09, 16 August 2016 (UTC) Fine with...

and Christian Science Monitor The Daily Mail is used as a source. WP:BLPSOURCES says that material only supported by tabloid journalism should not be...

September 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom. No SIGCOV in independent RS; fails WP:BLPSOURCES/WP:ANYBIO. —Fortuna, imperatrix 14:48, 29 September 2025 (UTC) Delete:...

Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) -  21:05, 13 September 2017 (UTC) Delete. From WP:BLPSOURCES, "Material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article is a borderline WP:BLPSOURCES-related train wreck. I declined an WP:A7 and WP:BLPPROD on this article...

"significant" and/or "reliable" coverage rules at WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:BLPSOURCES, which are the most relevant Wikipedia policies for this situation. ---DOOMSDAYER520...

cautions against for living persons, and MuslimMatters, a group blog. WP:BLPSOURCES says contentious material sourced this way "should be removed immediately...

CassiantoTalk 21:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC) Delete - after I removed the WP:BLPSOURCES violating content (citing blogs, the Daily Mail or just making stuff up...

duty end (talk) 13:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:BLP1E / WP:BLPSOURCES - I had a look and the most prominent news pieces I found were the Daily...

suggest some of the claims in the "Private life" section do not meet WP:BLPSOURCES and should be removed. That leaves us with the reliably sourced claim...

cautions against for living persons, and MuslimMatters, a group blog. WP:BLPSOURCES says contentious material sourced this way "should be removed immediately...

emphasis given to chart stats, this is still a BLP so in major breach of WP:BLPSOURCES (relying as it does on primary sources, in breach of WP:PTS). Blows WP:ANYBIO...

for notability. This indicates the topic fails BLP per BLPPRIMARY and BLPSOURCES and GNG. References are not reliable sources per fact checking and accuracy...

many are probably children. Fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:LISTPEOPLE, and WP:BLPSOURCES. Any blue links should already be present in List of women's artistic...

known for being kidnapped by aliens. The sourcing is a train-wreck of WP:BLPSOURCES-violating tabloid journalism, or otherwise just plain old "stuff on the...

(talk) 16:09, 28 November 2015 (UTC) Comment See also WP:INHERITED and WP:BLPSOURCES - I've remove the tabloid refs.--Egghead06 (talk) 17:09, 28 November 2015...

February 2025 (UTC) Delete. No indication that the article passes WP:BLP or BLPSOURCES; this is a fundamental failure. When his notability is established in...

its editorial independence and reliability (per WP:QUESTIONABLE and WP:BLPSOURCES, see also WP:PUS#News media). Finally, the remaining source, also casts...

September 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom. No SIGCOV in independent RS; fails WP:BLPSOURCES/WP:ANYBIO. —Fortuna, imperatrix 15:09, 29 September 2025 (UTC) Delete...

for the 96" and "stick it up your junta" into Google). Please read WP:BLPSOURCES carefully. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:29, 31 July 2017 (UTC) Suppose...

the code |blp=yes to the {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} template." After "{{BLPsources}} may be used on BLP pages needing better sourcing", added: "with {{BLPunsourced}}...

secondary sources with careful attribution, as required by WP:BLP/WP:BLPSOURCES. Contentious material about living persons must be written conservatively...

cautions against for living persons, and MuslimMatters, a group blog. WP:BLPSOURCES says contentious material sourced this way "should be removed immediately...

10:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC) Delete: This entire article is a huge WP:BLPSOURCES violation and it probably could've been blanked without discussion. I...

September 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom. No SIGCOV in independent RS; fails WP:BLPSOURCES/WP:ANYBIO. —Fortuna, imperatrix 14:54, 29 September 2025 (UTC) Delete...

you? Loew Galitz (talk) Keep. If the nominator is concerned about WP:BLPSOURCES, there are plenty of tags they could have used instead. There are sufficient...

cautions against for living persons, and MuslimMatters, a group blog. WP:BLPSOURCES says contentious material sourced this way "should be removed immediately...

POSSIBLY be read as supporting the text it is placed alongside). The BLPSources and Peacock concerns, raised by Liz, were simply ignored and the tags...

also sings other languages, but I strongly recommend them to read WP:BLPSOURCES and Wikipedia:Blogs as sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wapunguissa...

poorly sourced, which is unacceptable for a biographical article per WP:BLPSOURCES. Hzh (talk) 15:51, 9 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

amount to inherent notability. Where is the coverage required (see WP:BLPSOURCES). And bbbounds, are you connected to the subject? And to the creator of...

which are currently unsourced and subject to removal via WP:BOLD and WP:BLPSOURCES, are also non-notable. As an extreme example, if a person were to win...

mentions and from an unreliable sources. Please see WP:INDEPENDENT and WP:BLPSOURCES. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC) The interviews both have an...

particular reference to ANYBIO (done nothing to fulfil any criteria), BLPSOURCES (no independent, reliable third party sources support an assertion of...

cautions against for living persons, and MuslimMatters, a group blog. WP:BLPSOURCES says contentious material sourced this way "should be removed immediately...

Mccapra (talk) 21:06, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:BLPSOURCES. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC) Keep. There appears...

sufficiently attest to the depth or persistency of coverage needed to meet WP:BLPSOURCE or GNG. The sources presented rely overly on passing mentions to do so...

cautions against for living persons, and MuslimMatters, a group blog. WP:BLPSOURCES says contentious material sourced this way "should be removed immediately...

the subject is a minor, this page should be deleted. Does not meet WP:BLPSOURCES Gtwfan52 (talk) 21:55, 18 May 2012 (UTC) keep this article should not...

campaign reference, there are zero independent sources. I have added a blpsources tag to the article. Woogee (talk) 23:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC) Delete...

August 2021 (UTC) Comment: do you know it's BLP and unsourced? See WP:BLPSOURCES. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 03:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC) Delete I'm...

on him (and I trigged a spam filter by trying to add sources), but a {{blpsources}} tag would be more appropriate. Electric Catfish 15:09, 12 August 2012...

doesn't reach WP:MUSICBIO, or WP:NMUSICIAN. Not enough to satisfy WP:BLPSOURCES. scope_creepTalk 18:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC) Keep Well after reading the...

JSTOR · TWL) Entirely based on a single non-independent source. Fails WP:BLPSOURCES (WP:DEL-REASON # 9) and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 03:31, 31 May 2026 (UTC)...

through into the game. Unscintillating (talk) 01:13, 6 June 2013 (UTC) WP:BLPSOURCES states "Material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing...

publisher and also the copyright holder are the same Russian organisation. WP:BLPSOURCES says poorly sourced contentious material about a living person should...

or from primary sources, which don't help establish notability. Per WP:BLPSOURCE, "When material is both verifiable and noteworthy, it will have appeared...

the highest quality third-party, independent reliable sources per WP:BLPSOURCES. Also fails WP:ANYBIO and BASIC for similar reasons. ——Serial 16:59, 28...

in The Guardian and adding citations on all unsourced content per WP:BLPSOURCES. Does it look any better now? It's a shame the first couple of editors...

on their own are not sufficiently independent or third-party. Per WP:BLPSOURCES, contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly...

related, or just an article with a name drop of someone living), see WP:BLPSOURCES. While I see arguments all the time about performing a WP:BEFORE, please...

subject or their work elsewhere, and sourcing requirements for a BLP (WP:BLPSOURCES) are far higher than any other article; the necessary sourcing is not...

cautions against for living persons, and MuslimMatters, a group blog. WP:BLPSOURCES says contentious material sourced this way "should be removed immediately...

getting rid of the Mirror cites as much as possible was worth doing per WP:BLPSOURCES, and the one remaining cite to the cancellation of the TV drama (which...

statements, advertorials and passing mentions. The subject fails WP:ANYBIO and BLPSOURCES: there several mentions of him across the web, mostly social media. There...

passing mention in perezhilton.com, we should not have an article per WP:BLPSOURCES. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:12, 14 October 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

or no other edits outside this topic. Comment I have replaced Afd with BLPSources. There was really no reason to nominate this article for deletion, especially...

porn industry, and they meet all of the guidelines at WP:RELIABLE and WP:BLPSOURCES. These sources also contain enough information so that no original research...

notability. Scant coverage and what there is comes from tabloids (see WP:BLPSOURCES). Does not meet WP:BIO." Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 07:47, 12 February...

11:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC) Comment - just a note on tabloid sourcing, WP:BLPSOURCES says, "material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing...

the sourcing level for controversial claims is a lot higher, per WP:BLPSOURCES. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:11, 8 December 2023 (UTC) Keep: per KatoKungLee...

so—the sources do not exist to support the basics of WP:ANYBIO or WP:BLPSOURCES. SN54129 13:17, 15 August 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

2025 (UTC) Comment I remove the unsourced "Controveries" section per WP:BLPSOURCE. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 09:03, 7 January 2025 (UTC)...

think Rashkeqamar has managed to produce a list of the worst possible WP:BLPSOURCES-violating tabloids in the UK. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:47, 20 October...

in the article just look too close to tabloid journalism, and hence WP:BLPSOURCES has to come into play. I found sources in a news search, but for a different...

this instance is acceptable. The arguments against its use are that (a) BLPSOURCES prevent tabloid journalism being used as a source and (b) that the material...

where the statements made about the person were sourced from - see WP:BLPSOURCES. The second is that of notability. All articles in Wikipedia need to be...

people is not tolerated on Wikipedia. See WP:BLPREMOVE and especially WP:BLPSOURCES. It should be deleted immediately without discussion. Not sure of the...

article per WP:UNSOURCED, but particularly in the case of BLPs per WP:BLPSOURCES; moreover, the repeated re-adding of such unsourced or poorly sourced...

Netherlands U-15 debut on 24 May 2015, why didn't you remove the claim per WP:BLPSOURCES? A: The simple answer is that I don't think the statement is inaccurate...

(speak to me) 08:38, 20 March 2014 (UTC). Delete As I said before - As WP:BLPSOURCES says "Material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing...

this article meets WP:BAND. I believe this article is weak in meeting WP:BLPSOURCES. Someone with access to this off-line source: Encyclopaedia of Contemporary...

hide content in the main infobox about your wife and children per WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:BLPNAME so that it's inclusion can be further discussed at Talk:Eric...

the article has been edited in such a way that it no longer violates WP:BLPSOURCE. Thank you all for your help in resolving this matter." The administrator...

but I will list as many as I have time to tonight. WP:BLP issues: WP:BLPSOURCES "Material Should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is...

Evidence? Also, for our purposes we still have to overcome the WP:NOT and WP:BLPSOURCES issues which go beyond notability concerns. Keeping actually requires...

wrote does require sources under Wikipedia's guidelines, specifically WP:BLPSOURCES. Howicus (talk) 16:56, 28 June 2013 (UTC) My submission has been declined...

People, use of it for biographies of living persons does not violate WP:BLPSOURCES. Wehwalt, I am also a very experienced Wikipedia editor, and so are most...

*/ Actually, none of these are reliable source either. Removed per WP:BLPSOURCES." 22:30, 31 March 2018 (UTC) "/* Shooting survivor */ Sorry, but this...

against 3 seeing yesterday's reverts. In any event - I reverted today on BLPSOURCES grounds as the entire segment was in essence sourced to a single NEWSBLOG...

not considered in-depth significant coverage - see WP:SIGCOV, and WP:BLPSOURCE and WP:GNG for more information. I'm pretty sure the article will be retained...

you are still coming to terms with the ramifications of WP:BLP and WP:BLPSOURCES and you express this by reverting poorly-sourced material into an article...

in-line references (which I can see you do know how to make) correctly. WP:BLPSOURCES is worth a read to make sure you tick all the boxes. Nosebagbear (talk)...

self-published}} → {{BLP self-published}} {{Blpsources}}, {{BLPSources}}, {{BLPrefimprove}}, {{BLPsources}}, {{BLP Sources}}, {{Blp sources}}, {{BLPRefimprove}}...

tagged a contentious claim in the article with a {{fact}} tag. Again, WP:BLPSOURCES says that this information should not be tagged, it should be removed...

Deb (talk) 21:08, 23 April 2010 (UTC) I agree. That's why I added the blpsources tag. Woogee (talk) 21:17, 23 April 2010 (UTC) (ec) Publication of numerous...

cautions against for living persons, and MuslimMatters, a group blog. WP:BLPSOURCES says contentious material sourced this way "should be removed immediately...

because it lacks a citation at the end of the sentence. If there are not BLPSOURCES issues with contentious material about living persons that is unsourced...

content to be verified before trying to add it to the article per WP:BLPSOURCES. Moreover, as you can probably guess and may have experienced before based...

middle of the definition of "tabloid journalism" I would argue that WP:BLPSOURCES therefore applies here. Would someone else please take a look at the situation...

with a ban. It turns out that his issue was a misunderstanding of wp:blpsources. Kevin McE (talk) 10:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC) The block by the involved...

in question at the time Arzel reverted then Arzel had grounds under WP:BLPSOURCES. Note that the 3RR exemption for BLP would apply. – Lionel (talk) 01:39...

added to an article when the only sourcing is tabloid journalism per WP:BLPSOURCES" 15:24, 7 October 2015 (UTC) "Undid revision 684583988 by Non-dropframe...

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive208#John Barrowman (BLPSOURCES vs CONTEXTMATTERS)? Please see the closure request by a discussion participant...

Foxy Brown fan trying to improve the article and obviously hasn't had WP:BLPSOURCES explained to them. A bit less templating and a bit more assuming good...

they should be considered carefully to ensure that they comply with WP:BLPSOURCES. Thanks. --Legis (talk - contribs) 12:56, 19 May 2017 (UTC) Filer warned:...

point. Oaktree b (talk) 13:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC) Delete: Fails GNG and BLPSOURCES: vastly over-reliant on primary sources (see WP:PTS), passing mentions...

We say you cannot have an unsourced list of living people, because WP:BLPSOURCES clearly states: Wikipedia's sourcing policy, Verifiability, says that...

removing the entry.Justice1980 (talk) 21:11, 9 May 2021 (UTC) From WP:BLPSOURCES: "This policy extends that principle, adding that contentious material...

13:38. He restarted editing at 13:48, not correcting BLP unsourced to BLPsources (I already did that), but combining multiple tags into one tag[38][39][40]...

including tabloid journalism in local newspapers and websites (note WP:BLPSOURCES: "material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is...

which closed as "redirect"). The whole article reads like one big WP:BLPSOURCES violation to me, and the lack of sufficient quality sources presented...

2013 (UTC) The Daily Mail is a tabloid and cannot be used in BLPs per WP:BLPSOURCES. Fatherhope55 was (substantially) right and you were wrong to revert that...

that there should be an English-language entry for Christoph Cox, our WP:BLPSOURCES policy has a brightline requirement that articles on living persons have...

Show staff per AfD #1. The sources supplied by Robman94 are either WP:BLPSOURCES violating tabloid journalism or self-published (ie: non-independent) works...

article? And if you want to see that status of tabloids in BLPs, see WP:BLPSOURCES. - SchroCat (talk) 19:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC) @SchroCat: It's likely...

believe at this time, that Jigme Rinpoche is notable. It doesn't satisfy WP:BLPSOURCES scope_creepTalk 08:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC) I respectfully disagree...

defended that by paraphrasing WP:BLPSOURCES. However, by so doing, he shows that he does not understand BLPSOURCES. Policy requires removal of material...

been edit-warring on Mary Marquis over the past week, claiming that WP:BLPSOURCES entitles him to remove any references sourced to The Daily Mail. There...

a big issue, plus most sources would be in other languages. I added 'blpsources' and 'inline' tags to some, such as [120] here on Maximiliano Sigales...

only sane thing to do here is ensure that anything not compliant with WP:BLPSOURCES gets expunged from the article. I can see that Dorierosie wants her role...

notability without independent, reliable, secondary sources - WP:BLP (and WP:BLPSOURCES), WP:V still apply to article contents in BLPs. I will also note that...

MarchOrDie is the only person who alleges a BLP concern. The claim is that BLPsources prohibits sources that engage in tabloid journalism. But the cited section...

television news web site, which was that a lawsuit had been filed. As per WP:BLPSOURCES, the only time information should be removed is if it is coming from a...

writing a properly BLP-compliant biography when I have looked through WP:BLPSOURCES compliant material and have time to assemble it; alternatively, if anyone...

sourcing would be required to include/exclude those contested issues (see WP:BLPSOURCES). Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 03:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC) Thank you for finding...

February 2025 (UTC) Delete as paraOUTING. Insufficiently supported per BLPSOURCES. Also per Thryduulf, Drmies. Serial (speculates here) 06:58, 2 February...

quite appropriate. BLP or not. I was very happy to see Albert add the BLPsources tag. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:45, 23 July 2009 (UTC) No, staring...

defunct / taken over) does not fit WP:BLPSOURCES. The removal of the material was clearly marked with BLPSOURCES.Icewhiz (talk) 05:43, 10 May 2018 (UTC)...

reduction to time served. --DHeyward (talk) 04:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC) WP:BLPSOURCES states "...contentious material about living persons that is unsourced...

(UTC) The Daily Mirror can never be used as a source on a BLP per WP:BLPSOURCES. --John (talk) 19:11, 11 August 2013 (UTC) John's correct. Also, can someone...

and "I won't try to source an article" and you might as well change {{BLPsources}} to become an autodelete template. This is enforcing a self-created policy...

rewriting the whole thing from scratch, this time taking care to adhere to WP:BLPSOURCES. If anyone disagrees with this course of action, shout! Ritchie333 (talk)...

years later, the Amigoe is still the only source for these claims. WP:BLPSOURCES: "Wikipedia's sourcing policy, Verifiability, says that all quotations...

self-published or newspapers, which fail the higher requirements of WP:BLPSOURCES.--Launchballer 08:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

protected that article because he believes that said content infringes WP:BLPSOURCES. I disagree with his actions. In an attempt to fix this disagreement I...

for him to just say "hello". AFAIK there was the odd minor violation of BLPSOURCES, which under normal circumstances would justify at most a revert, and...

would like to know if believe that MBVW violated WP:ONUS, WP:NOCON, WP:BLPSOURCE and WP:BLPREMOVE by restoring eight times contentious materials. In the...

mlechnye puti 17:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC) SqueakBox, The wording in WP:BLPSOURCES is that material that is "unsourced or poorly sourced" is fair game for...

marriage and relationships to an otherwise non-notable person, and per WP:BLPSOURCES, if Satchett thinks the source is not sufficient quality, he is correct...

through them and trim out some of the chaff, usually with a summary of "WP:BLPSOURCES". As I write, the former list has one entry (where talk page consensus...

who should be crying BLP. I removed unsourced content from a BLP per WP:BLPSOURCE. As far the diffs above are concerned, they speak for themselves.-MrX...

IDONTLIKEIT. (Invocation of BLP is particularly dishonest in light of BLPSOURCES and BLPREMOVE, the actual policies under which data is to be deleted.)...

commented in talk, and will keep it on my watchlist. There are potential WP:BLPSOURCES problems with some of the material the "new" editor was trying to add...

01:30, 4 August 2019 (UTC) Here's a sample edit. WP:DAILYMAIL and WP:BLPSOURCES exist for a reason. Time for a block perhaps indeed. --69.120.40.196 (talk)...

Sphilbrick on the talk pages; so, even if there was no OTRS ticket, WP:BLPSOURCES, WP:DOB and WP:BLPREMOVE would've been applicable and you should've waited...

"whitewashing" allegations flying about, I made a single WP:BOLD edit, based on WP:BLPSOURCES concerns. When that didn't fly, I followed WP:BRD and stuck to the talk...

sentiment in Azerbaijan page that information is [WP:EXTRAORDINARY] and [WP:BLPSOURCE], user started new dispute and edit war on the same information on Hajibala...

BLP rules which cover living person at all times on all Wiki pages. WP:BLPSOURCES 4) "Your proposal would prevent all discussion of your behaviour on Wikipedia...

content about a living person is not in itself a BLP violation; as per WP:BLPSOURCE, the content would have to be contentious, challenged, or likely to be...

therefore not be used as a basis for statements about living persons (WP:BLPSOURCES). The response by E.M.Gregory does not recognize or address this, but...

living people when that information is likely to be challenged - see WP:BLPSOURCE. Chris troutman's response here, where he cites the information that DeAllenWeten...

WP:AE, this user continues to insert the same content that violates WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:RS: [47][48][49][50] Notification of the user against whom enforcement...

source for the current statistic, unless verification fails. Again, WP:BLPSOURCE only requires inline citations for contentious edits. A table of statistics...

Glaukopis website after History refused to publish it. Challenged as BLPSOURCES, and reverted. See subsequent BLP/n discussion. [43] - Use of self-published...

reliable sources to pass WP:ANYBIO, especuially those required by WP:BLPSOURCES. So, WP:NOPAGE. No redirect target is apparent either, although I'm open...

(UTC) Did you just suggest, Frickeg, that we should extend WP:BLPCAT, WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:NONDEF to cover the infobox |religion= field? I believe they already...

would help. It would also be good to add something more detailed to WP:BLPSOURCES. SarahSV (talk) 00:05, 8 January 2017 (UTC) @JzG: where is this reference...

July 2012 (UTC) If true, that's a legitimate WP:BLP concern, as per WP:BLPSOURCES. It may even qualify as a hoax, depending on how much was embellished...

find in a Wikipedia BLP article is supported by a reliable source per WP:BLPSOURCES and not everything found in a reliable source should be added to a Wikipedia...

part on tabloid sources and low-quality gossip sites, which violates WP:BLPSOURCES. FACR 1(d): "neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias: The article...

(UTC) In fact, you added external links with that edit. The template {{blpsources}} adds links to Google, so you can easily look up sources for that article...

and the Daily Mirror (five references each) good sources for a BLP? WP:BLPSOURCES instructs to avoid using such sources on BLPs, let alone featured articles...

be categorized as "Partner" of Benedict Cumberbatch to comply with WP:BLPSOURCES, WP:GRAPEVINE, and WP:BLPGOSSIP as evidenced in the following: 1. Source...

tags have nothing to do with the subject of the article (things like "BLPsources" and the like), and removing the actual template text from the page does...

the article? Several of the sources cited for this article are not WP:BLPSOURCES reliable. - MrX 🖋 19:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

or no other edits outside this topic. Comment I have replaced Afd with BLPSources. There was really no reason to nominate this article for deletion, especially...

the highest quality third-party, independent reliable sources per WP:BLPSOURCES. Also fails WP:ANYBIO and BASIC for similar reasons. ——Serial 16:59, 28...

riddled with original research and improper BLP sourcing? If we followed WP:BLPSOURCES the way you suggest, we'd have to remove anything not "attributed to a...

entries (speedy deleted) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Betacommand/blpsource (DELETE, with no prejudice for undeletion should anyone need to check...

Comment - this Daily Mail source has been removed on the grounds of WP:BLPSOURCES, which is quite wrong IMO since BLP guidelines do not apply to a plane...

association with Tiffany Trump, then that's just not good enough - WP:BLPSOURCES takes priority. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:34, 9 January 2020 (UTC) Keep...

porn industry, and they meet all of the guidelines at WP:RELIABLE and WP:BLPSOURCES. These sources also contain enough information so that no original research...

living people, as well as the general biography guidelines. Please see WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:ANYBIO. @SilhouetteCastle: please do not reply to this comment;...

sources to back up the claims in the article. You might check out WP:BLPSOURCES for more information on what kind of sources are good. --MTHarden (talk)...

poorly sourced, which is unacceptable for a biographical article per WP:BLPSOURCES. Hzh (talk) 15:51, 9 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

specific identifier. These identifiers, like WP:BLPPRIMARY, WP:WELLKNOWN, WP:BLPSOURCES are the ones that should be used when discussing about policy violations...

publisher, cited only in other borderline sources); since we hold WP:BLPSOURCES to a high standard, I'd lean towards not counting it in this context,...

lots of unsourced content, which can be particularly a problem per WP:BLPSOURCES. The current version seems to have been an attempt to remove what was...

to which my response is "What makes thedabbler.co.uk comply with WP:BLPSOURCES?" Elsewhere I see Draft:Geza Tarjanyi was declined at AfC for being an...

indication of significant coverage being found, or improvements to the the blpsources, other than adding two references from a music blog. WikiVirusC(talk)...

cautions against for living persons, and MuslimMatters, a group blog. WP:BLPSOURCES says contentious material sourced this way "should be removed immediately...

also sings other languages, but I strongly recommend them to read WP:BLPSOURCES and Wikipedia:Blogs as sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wapunguissa...

the article? Several of the sources cited for this article are not WP:BLPSOURCES reliable. - MrX 🖋 19:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

the content in the article to be properly verified as explained in WP:BLPSOURCES. There are lots of details about him in the article and most likely it's...

believe at this time, that Jigme Rinpoche is notable. It doesn't satisfy WP:BLPSOURCES scope_creepTalk 08:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC) I respectfully disagree...

because they are low quality sources unsuitable for BLP content per WP:BLPSOURCES: 6, 9, 10, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, and 22. That leaves us with 3 and 4 as...

deleted for the following reasons: WP:BLPCRIME, WP:AVOIDVICTIM, WP:NPF, WP:BLPSOURCE, WP:BLPGOSSIP, Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, Fails WP:SUSTAINED, WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE...

sufficiently attest to the depth or persistency of coverage needed to meet WP:BLPSOURCE or GNG. The sources presented rely overly on passing mentions to do so...

Mgm|(talk) 19:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC) It came from me :-) but is based on {{BLPsources}} and copies the text from there. I have no problem with changing the...

"significant" and/or "reliable" coverage rules at WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:BLPSOURCES, which are the most relevant Wikipedia policies for this situation. ---DOOMSDAYER520...

fails WP:DIRECTOR and WP:N. References given or found on the web fails WP:BLPSOURCES. Jim Carter 09:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

Twitter feed, not an Instagram post, not a gossip site). Please read WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:BLPPRIMARY carefully. 3) "I'll resubmit it with the same references...

Mccapra (talk) 21:06, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:BLPSOURCES. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC) Keep. There appears...

doesn't reach WP:MUSICBIO, or WP:NMUSICIAN. Not enough to satisfy WP:BLPSOURCES. scope_creepTalk 18:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC) Keep Well after reading the...

at WP:RGW, WP:VNT and WP:UNDUE. In addition, might want to look at WP:BLPSOURCES (if the persons in question are still living), WP:NOTEVERYTHING and WP:CAUTIOUS...

better-than-primary sourcing about a hopelessly obscure conference); WP:BLPSOURCES notes that "When material is both verifiable and noteworthy, it will have...

explained in WP:OWN. Inappropriate content can be removed by anyone per WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:BLPREMOVE, but editors might not always be in agreement as to whether...

(talk) 14:48, 25 August 2018 (UTC) There certainly is a prohibition: WP:BLPSOURCES applies to two of the removals. The 1910 one seems like trivia. I would...

there's no substantive treatment in any source reliable enough for WP:BLPSOURCES, so WP:GNG fails. FourViolas (talk) 04:09, 16 August 2016 (UTC) Fine with...

for notability. This indicates the topic fails BLP per BLPPRIMARY and BLPSOURCES and GNG. References are not reliable sources per fact checking and accuracy...

if you can find a suitable citation yourself. In some cases (e.g. WP:BLPSOURCES), it might be better to remove the content altogether, but that's a self-assessment...

duty end (talk) 13:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:BLP1E / WP:BLPSOURCES - I had a look and the most prominent news pieces I found were the Daily...

back up the info under "Youth and Amateur" in order to conform to WP:BLPSOURCES. Bjelleklang - talk 07:43, 7 November 2012 (UTC) The sources have been...

18:58, 23 May 2014 (UTC) Shorten Not just WP:RS but the more strict WP:BLPSOURCES must apply. If the notable press coverage is overwhelmingly negative,...

Comment - this Daily Mail source has been removed on the grounds of WP:BLPSOURCES, which is quite wrong IMO since BLP guidelines do not apply to a plane...

which are currently unsourced and subject to removal via WP:BOLD and WP:BLPSOURCES, are also non-notable. As an extreme example, if a person were to win...

Mail, the Daily Mirror or the Daily Record as sources on a BLP, per WP:BLPSOURCES. --John (talk) 22:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC) Done. Removed those three...

tagged a contentious claim in the article with a {{fact}} tag. Again, WP:BLPSOURCES says that this information should not be tagged, it should be removed...

considered notable, but without reliable sources it is impossible to meet WP:BLPSOURCES policy. Concerning the misspelling of Engineer, I suggest that if this...

point here being no unreliable sources may be used in a BLP, ever (See WP:BLPSOURCES). Second, review WP:PRIMARY: "Primary sources are very close to an event...

Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) -  21:05, 13 September 2017 (UTC) Delete. From WP:BLPSOURCES, "Material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is...

amount to inherent notability. Where is the coverage required (see WP:BLPSOURCES). And bbbounds, are you connected to the subject? And to the creator of...

Fenix down (talk) 15:35, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Speedy Delete: Per WP:BLPSOURCES, unreferenced BLP fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk)...

Wizards (talk) 20:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:V, WP:GNG, WP:BLPSOURCES --—— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 18:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC) The above...

worked on are unsourced which causes concern under WP:BLP, especially WP:BLPSOURCES. The one source given leads to Facebook. Although apparently an official...

you might want to take a look at WP:SURNAME and WP:PUFF as well as WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:BLPNAMES for some possible issues that I noticed about the draft...

campaign reference, there are zero independent sources. I have added a blpsources tag to the article. Woogee (talk) 23:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC) Delete...

through into the game. Unscintillating (talk) 01:13, 6 June 2013 (UTC) WP:BLPSOURCES states "Material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing...

Show staff per AfD #1. The sources supplied by Robman94 are either WP:BLPSOURCES violating tabloid journalism or self-published (ie: non-independent) works...

their edit summary: "Removed unsourced material per WP:BLPREMOVE and WP:BLPSOURCES". What they mean is Wikipedia is only supposed to contain information...

Keep Solidly referenced to reliable sources—to the extent of passing WP:BLPSOURCES—and WP:ANYBIO. Furthermore, the nomination is flawed per WP:SKCRIT1 (and...

Deb (talk) 21:08, 23 April 2010 (UTC) I agree. That's why I added the blpsources tag. Woogee (talk) 21:17, 23 April 2010 (UTC) (ec) Publication of numerous...

association with Tiffany Trump, then that's just not good enough - WP:BLPSOURCES takes priority. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:34, 9 January 2020 (UTC) Keep...

the third does not source the claim or mention the subject. Needs WP:BLPSOURCES to meet verifiability criteria. At this time it fails to meet our WP:GNG...

for the 96" and "stick it up your junta" into Google). Please read WP:BLPSOURCES carefully. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:29, 31 July 2017 (UTC) Suppose...

should this now be taken to AN/I as Scalhotrod seems determined to ignore BLPSOURCES and this noticeboard as well and restore unsourced info about living people...

in the article just look too close to tabloid journalism, and hence WP:BLPSOURCES has to come into play. I found sources in a news search, but for a different...

because they are low quality sources unsuitable for BLP content per WP:BLPSOURCES: 6, 9, 10, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, and 22. That leaves us with 3 and 4 as...

point here being no unreliable sources may be used in a BLP, ever (See WP:BLPSOURCES). Second, review WP:PRIMARY: "Primary sources are very close to an event...

may be acceptable over on IMDB it is not acceptable here. Finally, WP:BLPSOURCES states "This policy extends that principle, adding that contentious material...

exists. SecretName101 (talk) 20:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:NPOV. Until and unless there is substantial movement to impeach...

change. As I said, though, that article is really poorly sourced per WP:BLPSOURCES. Unless proper sourcing can be found, it's quite possible that not only...

contentious material about a living person meets the requirements of WP:BLP, WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:UNDUE. The concern is that the claim relies on decades‑old speculative...

WP:SIGCOV for verifiability reasons; particularly on BLPS per Wikipedia:BLPSOURCES.4meter4 (talk) 04:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC) Your opinion that that SNG should...

clean up. Insomesia (talk) 02:31, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:BLPSOURCES. The references given are either: dead links [30] [31], trivial blog mentions...

they can be verified per WP:ABOUTSELF, adhering to the basic rules of WP:BLPSOURCES. Pinging @NegativeMP1, Vrxces, and Madeleine961: for possible reconsideration...

won't read about in broadsheet newspapers. The sources are typical WP:BLPSOURCES violating tabloid fodder, and a search for alternatives reveals the same...

suggest some of the claims in the "Private life" section do not meet WP:BLPSOURCES and should be removed. That leaves us with the reliably sourced claim...

references (which would be enough to replace the "unsourced" tag with "BLPsources"). Other concerns remain.--Plad2 (talk) 07:19, 17 December 2010 (UTC)...

Keep Solidly referenced to reliable sources—to the extent of passing WP:BLPSOURCES—and WP:ANYBIO. Furthermore, the nomination is flawed per WP:SKCRIT1 (and...

whether it is in a biography or in some other article." (Please see WP:BLPSOURCES.) Keep Notability of the topic is shown by the sources mentioning family...

on their own are not sufficiently independent or third-party. Per WP:BLPSOURCES, contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly...

/What? 17:30, 30 April 2012 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BLPSOURCES. Probable WP:COI and promotion. No in-line sources provided. External...

article was removed as being gossip sourced to tabloids contrary to WP:BLPSOURCES. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC) Redirect to Amschel...

WP:SELFPUB, fails WP:WELLKNOWN, fails WP:NPF, fails WP:BLPTALK, and fails WP:BLPSOURCES. (See Talk:David R. Hawkins#WP:SELFPUBLISH for further reasons behind...

on him (and I trigged a spam filter by trying to add sources), but a {{blpsources}} tag would be more appropriate. Electric Catfish 15:09, 12 August 2012...

unanimously) and NBOX (unanimously). However, by strength of argument, BLPSOURCES is not met, HEYMANN has not occurred, and therefore according to cited...

its editorial independence and reliability (per WP:QUESTIONABLE and WP:BLPSOURCES, see also WP:PUS#News media). Finally, the remaining source, also casts...

based on a one-sided court document (or equivalent thereof). Tagged for BLPsources for over a year. Searching for independent reliable sources resulted in...

11:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC) Comment - just a note on tabloid sourcing, WP:BLPSOURCES says, "material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing...

passing mention in perezhilton.com, we should not have an article per WP:BLPSOURCES. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:12, 14 October 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not so notable per WP:NACTOR and fails WP:BLPSOURCES. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 20:51, 7 October 2016 (UTC) Delete: Zero search results that...

have added the one source I can find to The Independent that passes WP:BLPSOURCES and brought the discussion here. Your thoughts, please. Ritchie333 (talk)...

but I will list as many as I have time to tonight. WP:BLP issues: WP:BLPSOURCES "Material Should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is...

possible something too contentious (e.g. content that falls under WP:BLPSOURCES) to leave in the article. Regardless of what you decide to do, you should...

people is not tolerated on Wikipedia. See WP:BLPREMOVE and especially WP:BLPSOURCES. It should be deleted immediately without discussion. Not sure of the...

that's all the sources are, listings, but nothing that ammounts to WP:BLPSOURCES. And for someone who is apparently so notable, no substantial Ghits. A...

better-than-primary sourcing about a hopelessly obscure conference); WP:BLPSOURCES notes that "When material is both verifiable and noteworthy, it will have...

published, except a list of articles attributed to her (trouble with WP:BLPSOURCES). Thus subject of the article fails WP:NACADEMICS since she has not won...

December 2019 (UTC) These sources should generally be avoided per WP:BLPSOURCES. Sanders is running a national campaign, so there are plenty of mainstream...

Energy10 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 3 October 2011 (UTC) I have removed it [1] per your post and WP:BLPSOURCES. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:42, 3 October 2011 (UTC)...

article per WP:UNSOURCED, but particularly in the case of BLPs per WP:BLPSOURCES; moreover, the repeated re-adding of such unsourced or poorly sourced...

education, etc. then you need to provide sources for them as well per WP:BLPSOURCES; otherwise, the unsourced content can be removed at anytime. Even if you...

commissions, then you should add supporting citations as well per WP:BLPSOURCES. The more unsourced content you add to an article, the more likely it's...

actually does specifically condemn tabloid journalism, in the section WP:BLPSOURCE, though it does not enumerate specific tabloids by name. There is no reason...

may be subject to Deletion if reliable sources are not provided per WP:BLPSOURCES. --Animalparty-- (talk) 21:45, 12 April 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

please stop adding IMDB and fan forums as references, WP:IMDB and WP:BLPSOURCES (part of BLP), as you did in your recent onslaught of edits. Unless this...

deleted for the following reasons: WP:BLPCRIME, WP:AVOIDVICTIM, WP:NPF, WP:BLPSOURCE, WP:BLPGOSSIP, Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, Fails WP:SUSTAINED, WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE...

August 2021 (UTC) Comment: do you know it's BLP and unsourced? See WP:BLPSOURCES. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 03:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC) Delete I'm...

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC) Delete Top news hit is the WP:BLPSOURCES-violating Daily Star and it just goes downhill from there. Unsalvageable...

in The Guardian and adding citations on all unsourced content per WP:BLPSOURCES. Does it look any better now? It's a shame the first couple of editors...

the coverage about the subject. Article doesn't even pass through WP:BLPSOURCES criteria. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 17:55, 20 April 2014 (UTC) Note: This...

The policies/guidelines in play are WP:QUESTIONABLE, WP:SELFSOURCE, WP:BLPSOURCES, and WP:CHALLENGE. Yesterday, I laid out my case in detail for exactly...

and replaced them with WP:Citation needed tags in some cases, citing WP:BLPSOURCES. I have to point out that People is generally not considered tabloid journalism...

using an unverified Twitter account doesn't meet the requirements of WP:BLPSOURCES, though if there is consensus that it can be used in this case then I'm...

notability. Scant coverage and what there is comes from tabloids (see WP:BLPSOURCES). Does not meet WP:BIO." Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 07:47, 12 February...

I followed this up at Talk:Katie Hopkins#Surgery (and relation to WP:BLPSOURCES) as a search for better sources brought up little more than the "usual...

rigorously sourced or else it can and most likely will be removed per WP:BLPSOURCES. So, instead of adding more unsourced content, it might be best to try...

sources to back up the claims in the article. You might check out WP:BLPSOURCES for more information on what kind of sources are good. --MTHarden (talk)...

material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable (from WP:BLPSOURCES) Comment by Arbitrators: Comment by parties: Comment by others: proposed...

think Rashkeqamar has managed to produce a list of the worst possible WP:BLPSOURCES-violating tabloids in the UK. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:47, 20 October...

related, or just an article with a name drop of someone living), see WP:BLPSOURCES. While I see arguments all the time about performing a WP:BEFORE, please...

CassiantoTalk 21:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC) Delete - after I removed the WP:BLPSOURCES violating content (citing blogs, the Daily Mail or just making stuff up...

self-published or newspapers, which fail the higher requirements of WP:BLPSOURCES.--Launchballer 08:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

mirroring stuff found on other pages? Does not seem to reliable per WP:BLPSOURCES, but I'm not sure. Thanks in advance. - Marchjuly (talk) 05:48, 13 April...

actually does specifically condemn tabloid journalism, in the section WP:BLPSOURCE, though it does not enumerate specific tabloids by name. There is no reason...

this article meets WP:BAND. I believe this article is weak in meeting WP:BLPSOURCES. Someone with access to this off-line source: Encyclopaedia of Contemporary...

case with respect to content about living persons as explained in WP:BLPSOURCES. Does this mean that all content found in all Wikipedia articles is actually...

known for being kidnapped by aliens. The sourcing is a train-wreck of WP:BLPSOURCES-violating tabloid journalism, or otherwise just plain old "stuff on the...

the subject is a minor, this page should be deleted. Does not meet WP:BLPSOURCES Gtwfan52 (talk) 21:55, 18 May 2012 (UTC) keep this article should not...

not considered in-depth significant coverage - see WP:SIGCOV, and WP:BLPSOURCE and WP:GNG for more information. I'm pretty sure the article will be retained...

Enquirer are not. --Orlady (talk) 06:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC) Per WP:BLPSOURCES Wikipedia's sourcing policy, Verifiability, says that all quotations and...

whether it is in a biography or in some other article." (Please see WP:BLPSOURCES.) Keep Notability of the topic is shown by the sources mentioning family...

canned shit" rather than the incident being covered by tabloid sources (WP:BLPSOURCES) which would not be considered reliable. An article can be created on...

date sports results, and that those are pretty reliable - however, WP:BLPSOURCES correctly states, "When material is both verifiable and noteworthy, it...

(talk) 19:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC) Redirect Do Not Merge. Fails ANYBIO, BLPSOURCE. Passing mentions. Insignificant coverage. Nothing notable to merge, no...

inappropriate sources, including Wikia, Tumblr; a big 'no, no' in the eyes of WP:BLPSOURCES. —MelbourneStar☆talk 09:03, 6 May 2013 (UTC) Comment - So you believe...

back up the info under "Youth and Amateur" in order to conform to WP:BLPSOURCES. Bjelleklang - talk 07:43, 7 November 2012 (UTC) The sources have been...

no WP:RS to justify the statement. What awards? Presended by? Fails WP:BLPSOURCES with no in-line source at all. All of the books listed with Davies as...

Francesca<ref>[cite to Mail]</ref>", that can just just be removed per WP:BLPSOURCES. For something like a sports result citing The Sun, that needs to be checked...

exists. SecretName101 (talk) 20:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:NPOV. Until and unless there is substantial movement to impeach...

(speak to me) 08:38, 20 March 2014 (UTC). Delete As I said before - As WP:BLPSOURCES says "Material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing...

material. Still, I grant you that, in some quarters, policies such as WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:ONUS aren't as important as WP:VAGUEWAVE, WP:ILIKEIT and WP:SOAPBOX...

considering the recency of her suicide, this is a BLP issue per WP:BDP. WP:BLPSOURCES allows editors to remove non-RS material, even when neutral, at once and...

publisher, cited only in other borderline sources); since we hold WP:BLPSOURCES to a high standard, I'd lean towards not counting it in this context,...

His third said "WP:BLPSOURCES worth a read at this point", as if I hadn't. His fourth and fifth deletions simply say "BLPSOURCES". At no time has he...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLPSOURCES--There are none. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:02, 13 May 2012 (UTC) Comment. It...

(talk) 16:09, 28 November 2015 (UTC) Comment See also WP:INHERITED and WP:BLPSOURCES - I've remove the tabloid refs.--Egghead06 (talk) 17:09, 28 November 2015...

removed? Would the relevant policy be WP:UNSOURCED, WP:QUESTIONABLE, WP:BLPSOURCES, WP:CIRCULAR or something else? Thanks again. - Marchjuly (talk) 08:18...

inappropriate sources, including Wikia, Tumblr; a big 'no, no' in the eyes of WP:BLPSOURCES. —MelbourneStar☆talk 09:03, 6 May 2013 (UTC) Comment - So you believe...

WP:SELFPUB, fails WP:WELLKNOWN, fails WP:NPF, fails WP:BLPTALK, and fails WP:BLPSOURCES. (See Talk:David R. Hawkins#WP:SELFPUBLISH for further reasons behind...

to use this source - to make a claim about a living person. Under WP:BLPSOURCES 'unsourced or poorly sourced... whether the material is negative, positive...

please stop adding IMDB and fan forums as references, WP:IMDB and WP:BLPSOURCES (part of BLP), as you did in your recent onslaught of edits. Unless this...

Twitter feed, not an Instagram post, not a gossip site). Please read WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:BLPPRIMARY carefully. 3) "I'll resubmit it with the same references...

resume.  GuardianH  22:08, 16 March 2025 (UTC) Delete. Fails GNG and BLPSOURCES: vastly over-reliant on primary sources (see WP:PTS) rather than independent...

claim to be. Eh, it's probably OK for trivial claims consistent with WP:BLPSOURCES. If the IP editor still objects, then either back down or open an RfC...

you? Loew Galitz (talk) Keep. If the nominator is concerned about WP:BLPSOURCES, there are plenty of tags they could have used instead. There are sufficient...

Hi Benicio2020. You kind of do exactly what you've done so far per WP:BLPSOURCES except that you might want to follow up by starting a discussion about...

constituted five times her annual income and five times her net worth. WP:BLPSOURCES does not require magazines with identifiable political leanings to be...

justification for reverting quickly and without due diligence is that WP:BLPSOURCE allows such behaviour. SilkTork (talk) 02:41, 8 January 2019 (UTC) Comment...

be categorized as "Partner" of Benedict Cumberbatch to comply with WP:BLPSOURCES, WP:GRAPEVINE, and WP:BLPGOSSIP as evidenced in the following: 1. Source...

(talk) 23:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC) Presumably this is a reference to WP:BLPSOURCES "Material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is...

being blanket-removed. Instead, Hillbilly called John in, who said: "WP:BLPSOURCES is the place to look for guidance." One revert and a level-4 warning later...

a source as an accusation of cheating. I have therefore considered WP:BLPSOURCE to trump WP:BLPPRIMARY in such cases, in line with the objective of WP:BLP...

for Kenichi Mochizuki and changed the article from "BLPunsourced" to "BLPsources" as part of the current month focus at the BLP Rescue Project. There are...

such sources exist, then you need to remove the content. See WP:V and WP:BLPSOURCES. S0091 (talk) 20:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC) 47.40.238.193 (talk · contribs)...

pieces to reference controversial stuff in BLPs but that is covered by WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:NEWSBLOG. That doesn't make the whole paper unreliable.— NZFC(talk)(cont)...

material that I cannot support with sources (following the guidelines at WP:BLPSOURCES). Alternatively, if the article contained no relevant sources about the...

"colloquial" tone' is typical of a tabloid, which is unsuitable per WP:BLPSOURCES. Lack of evidence for a strong reputation for fact-checking or editorial...

Zuck28 (talk) 11:04, 25 August 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEWSORGINDIA and BLPSOURCES. —Fortuna, imperatrix 14:26, 26 August 2025 (UTC) Keep There seem to be...

reliable published source in which this fact is stated; take a look at WP:BLPSOURCE and WP:TRUTH for more on this. Without such sources any statement on your...

leave them out. I believe that using SELFSOURCE as an end-run around WP:BLPSOURCES like this is a little disingenuous; if a source is unreliable for BLPs...

"source" in contention should have been addressed individually with WP:BLPSOURCES and not deleted summarily by "one editor consensus" of sources. The author...

(the mother is a BLP, the subject a BDP) to questionable sources per BLPSOURCES.Icewhiz (talk) 18:46, 13 June 2018 (UTC) Unequivocally not true. Read...

the astrology. Your comparison to the National Enquirer seems apt. WP:BLPSOURCES clearly states, "Material should not be added to an article when the only...

and not appropriate for sourcing information on BLP articles. Per WP:BLPSOURCES: "Material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is...

closure, and nobody was apparently able to find any during the AfD. WP:BLPSOURCES, part of the main BLP policy, provides: "Wikipedia's sourcing policy,...

question on the policy, where the opening editor wrote, "Does the WP:BLPSOURCES ban on tabloid journalism mean that no BLP material can be sourced to...

considered suspect but not immediately unusable for BLP purposes (See WP:BLPSOURCE). Except the Daily Mail was found to be unreliable in general - let alone...

The material – as it's written – appears to be a BLP violation per WP:BLPSOURCES. The source, as an opinion piece, lacks meaningful editorial oversight...

solely of enforcing core Wikipedia policies, particularly WP:BLP, WP:BLPSOURCES, WP:V, and WP:UNDUE. 1. Nature of my edits Every edit I have made to the...

against high-quality reliable sources ..." (WP:WIAFA). This is a BLP, so WP:BLPSOURCES applies too. It's about a woman, so it would be good if you could avoid...

on my talk (ie: "get rid of all unsourced or unverified content per WP:BLPSOURCES, then see what you've got left") Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:11, 26 February...

Unscintillating (talk) 06:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC) The basis for this WP:BLPSOURCES. This states "Material should not be added to an article when the only...

of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive208#John Barrowman (BLPSOURCES vs CONTEXTMATTERS). Cunard (talk) 09:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)  Done Number...

What makes them shit? They follow all the rules of WP:RELIABLE and WP:BLPSOURCES. They contain enough information so that no original research would need...

needing to follow RS BLPSOURCES as I laid out most clearly on the talk page here. It seems like I can rely on WP:BDP BLPSOURCES & WP:BLPREMOVE but given...

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive208#John Barrowman (BLPSOURCES vs CONTEXTMATTERS). The editors with a different view than mine or Drovethrughosts's...

2018 (UTC) @Tqiwiki: I disagree with some of the above advice. Per WP:BLPSOURCES, you must remove unsourced material if it has been "challenged or is likely...

Take a look at Wikipedia:Verifiability for why this is important, and WP:BLPSOURCES for why it is particularly important for articles on living people. Cordless...

more reliable sources. Suggest it be removed from the article per WP:BLPSOURCES - "Material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is...

paper with questionable reliability (Actu.) That's a violation of WP:BLPSOURCES. The others are gerontological or genealogy sites, which could be considered...

especially for issues of personal identity. For another example, see WP:BLPSOURCES: "When material is both verifiable and noteworthy, it will have appeared...

believe that the site fails as a RS per WP:UGC, WP:QUESTIONABLE and WP:BLPSOURCES. Since none information being supported by Taddlr cites seems particularly...

awards, etc.) which might be challenged by someone down the road per WP:BLPSOURCES. Overall, I've seen much worse drafts than this, so I don't see any problem...

provided to be discussed upon; talk is bordering "libel" and "slander". WP:BLPSOURCES and importantly; whole interview was skimmed down to one single biased...

distinction of convicted vs. alleged. Diff. Last, I swapped the template to {{BLPsources}} as the sports-oriented content remained undercited (here). I'd like...

BLP's with insufficient sourcing should preferably get the template {{BLPsources}} (Category:BLP articles lacking sources), while completely unsourced...

have is to avoid use of those words and stick to the facts. And since WP:BLPSOURCE dictates that contentious material about living persons that is unsourced...

directly supports the claim, then I don't see any problem in that case. WP:BLPSOURCES demands an inline citation for material that is challenged or likely to...

marital status but rather remove it straight away, as specified by WP:BLPSOURCES. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:53, 12 April 2017 (UTC) On reflection, I think...

others participation.--Mark Miller (talk) 06:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC) WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:BLPREMOVE: "Wikipedia's sourcing policy, Verifiability, says that...

consensus. And if it is controversial and unsourced then clearly per WP:BLPSOURCES.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC) I think we can...

(whether negative, positive, or neutral) about living persons. Also see WP:BLPSOURCES. ...all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged...

of sexual harassment and 2021 investigation" subsection following WP:BLPSOURCE, which says "contentious material about living persons that is unsourced...

of sources that are in noway reliable. The Globe Mail is a tabloid. WP:BLPSOURCES Material should not be added when the only source is a tabloid. They are...

What makes them shit? They follow all the rules of WP:RELIABLE and WP:BLPSOURCES. They contain enough information so that no original research would need...

Good point about the "relatively unknown" bit. We could also point to WP:BLPSOURCES where the sourcing is pretty much those related to tabloid journalism...

the code |blp=yes to the {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} template." After "{{BLPsources}} may be used on BLP pages needing better sourcing", added: "with {{BLPunsourced}}...

BLP's with insufficient sourcing should preferably get the template {{BLPsources}} (Category:BLP articles lacking sources), while completely unsourced...

Daily Mail might be argued as a false positive, though I would say per WP:BLPSOURCES that if the information is that noteworthy, the broadsheets would have...

section speculating on his middle name. Aside from clearly violating WP:BLPSOURCES the subject of the article itself has denied the validity of the information...

re-add); here with AnonIP writing: Violates WP:BLPSTYLE, WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:BLPSOURCES, WP:BLPSPS and probably others. The statement is an accurate reflection...

source from the prosecution. Using this source seems to run afoul of WP:BLPSOURCES, WP:GRAPEVINE, WP:BLPCRIME, and WP:CRIME. Higher quality sources like...

question acknowledged to be genuine by the subject? If not, this fails BLPSOURCES and can never be used on a BLP (think how easy it would be to fake such...

line on this achievement. On further examination, I've also added a {{BLPsources}} tag. Verifiability issues will need to be dealt with if this is to be...

discussion about whether the available sources meet the bar required by WP:BLPSOURCES for inclusion of material about conspiracy theories in the article Liz...

(talk) 15:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC) Please read WP:VERIFY and also read WP:BLPSOURCES on the sourcing requirements for biographies of living persons. Your current...

01:02, 21 August, 2013 (UTC) The Daily Mail is a tabloid and triggers WP:BLPSOURCES. If the subject really did say this in an interview, a proper source will...

high-quality news organizations should be used.” I have added Blpdispute and BLPsources as this page clearly needs a larger pool of editors looking it over; and...

requirements for claims about living persons. See WP:RSP and our policies at WP:BLPSOURCES for details on the types of sources that we're looking for. Woodroar (talk)...

to challenge the sources, please explain if they do not fulfil the WP:BLPSOURCES-standards.Jeff5102 (talk) 10:17, 21 July 2011 (UTC) Please note that my...

most of that, but the article still has some sourcing problems per WP:BLPSOURCES. Content about Mover's involvement with Drumhead can likely be re-added...

2010 (UTC) I removed the advert tag and changed {{BLPunsourced}} to {{BLPsources}} - it could do with a few more. I also removed the image placeholder...

given by other users: Ocaasi (sysop), at Aaron Swartz, concern about BLPSOURCES: 15:55, 7 February 2013 Ocaasi . . (→JSTOR: rephrase, a bit more neutrally...

history | links | watch | logs) Temporary semi protection: IPs violating WP:BLPSOURCES and repeatedly adding citations to the banned BLP source, the Daily Mail...

these IP editions have been used: absurdal, unreliable sources (a WP:BLPSOURCES case), or pages that are not real sources, because they do not confirm...

information about a relationship cited to a blog) may be correct per WP:BLPSOURCES. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC) We Charity (edit |...

about Sammy Sosa Haitian ancestry should be included without providing WP:BLPSOURCES. The article's Early life include the statement "Sosa's paternal family...

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Near-constant vandalism and BLPSOURCE violations since PCP was applied at the beginning of 2014. Philroc (c)...

crappy sources to make assertions about a person's sexuality. See WP:BLPSOURCES. To me, all you have here is the equivalent of tabloid journalism. §FreeRangeFrogcroak...

on my talk (ie: "get rid of all unsourced or unverified content per WP:BLPSOURCES, then see what you've got left") Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:11, 26 February...

implies a casual link and his involvement: [51], [52], [53]. Looks like WP:BLPSOURCE violation. Brandmeistertalk 21:20, 23 January 2022 (UTC) Seems to be pretty...

Folken de Fanel (talk) 17:45, 11 September 2013 (UTC) Concerns are WP:BLPSOURCES, WP:GRAPEVINE and WP:BLPGOSSIP because of the attribution and stating...

an opinion column from the Washington Post). My understanding from WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:BLPSPS is that some of these sources are not acceptable. There's...

10:46, 6 March 2018 (UTC) The rather strong technical leg here is WP:BLPSOURCES - a single NEWSBLOG source + Max Blumenthal's opinion (which may be notable...

Oppose Too much unsourced content, and this does not really comply with WP:BLPSOURCES. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC) @Ritchie333: What's...

tagger did cite several reasons: "WP:BLPCRIME, WP:AVOIDVICTIM, WP:NPF, WP:BLPSOURCE, WP:BLPGOSSIP, Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, Fails WP:SUSTAINED, WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE...

claim needs to be supported by a citation to a reliable source per WP:BLPSOURCES. For future reference, you can also remove such claims yourself if you...

poorly sourced and highly contentious, so it should be removed per WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:BLPREMOVE. I attempted to do just that, but my action was promptly...

see any urgency here to add because its all guess work up-till now. WP:BLPSOURCES - Material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is...

'tabloid', it doesn't refer to second-hand gossip or speculation." Um, per WP:BLPSOURCES, it does. You also don't seem to understand that we can summarize sources...

contentious or controversial, however you want to phrase it. See WP:BLPSOURCES. In regard to your point #3, the only source I saw being used to support...

(UTC) JJ's article is indeed not in a good shape. I've tagged with {{BLPsources}} due to the chunks of unref'd text. The series article could work if...

serious misunderstanding of both Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia:BLPSOURCES. I look forward to other editors taking a look at the article and dealing...

December 2011 (UTC) I think the BLP needs an overhaul in the way of WP:BLPSOURCES (blogs, even one-time local news reports about other people anyway...)...

Delete per a dearth of WP:SIGCOV sufficient to psas the high bar of WP:BLPSOURCES. Most of the sourcing is PR ('trade'), WP:PRIMARY and MENTIONs. Fails...

those pesky citation needed paragraphs are gone. Its a good thing WP:BLPSOURCE applies to the recently dead and *requires* citations otherwise any info...

cautions against for living persons, and MuslimMatters, a group blog. WP:BLPSOURCES says contentious material sourced this way "should be removed immediately...

exceedingly well sourced so is not a BLP violation (specifically, see WP:BLPSOURCES and the following subsections at WP:BLP). As the sourcing is both reliable...

been occupied by the Prince" was only sourced to the Express, and as WP:BLPSOURCES states "Material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing...

point I started a discussion with the creator AnsarAction, explaining WP:BLPSOURCES to him. He's supplied some other sources, including a link to a BBC TV...

ThePlatypusofDoom: I did a little cleaning and tagged it for notability and BLPsources. My take is that the notability is pretty weak-- I could not find any...

[7] supposedly written by Stephen Schneider (deceased), in breach of WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:BLOGS. I have been removing this material in accord with WP:BLPREMOVE...

MPS1992 (talk) 21:49, 22 December 2018 (UTC) No, there's no such policy. WP:BLPSOURCE: "must be attributed to a reliable, published source" Not multiple, Andy...

bearing on Wikipedia. The BLP question here is whether you have a WP:BLPSOURCES complaint source - which a blog (which incidentally, has some of the details...

"source" in contention should have been addressed individually with WP:BLPSOURCES and not deleted summarily by "one editor consensus" of sources. The author...

the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations." WP:BLPSOURCE- This policy extends that principle, adding that contentious material...

the article has been edited in such a way that it no longer violates WP:BLPSOURCE. Thank you all for your help in resolving this matter. --PluniaZ (talk)...

(talk) 14:48, 25 August 2018 (UTC) There certainly is a prohibition: WP:BLPSOURCES applies to two of the removals. The 1910 one seems like trivia. I would...

Mail, the Daily Mirror or the Daily Record as sources on a BLP, per WP:BLPSOURCES. --John (talk) 22:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC) Done. Removed those three...

be 1) reliably sourced (and reflect due weight given by sources) (WP:BLPSOURCES), 2) remain neutral in tone (WP:BLPSTYLE), and 3) refrain from giving...

be 1) reliably sourced (and reflect due weight given by sources) (WP:BLPSOURCES), 2) remain neutral in tone (WP:BLPSTYLE), and 3) refrain from giving...

this case is as I noted above WP:BLPGOSSIP and to a lesser extent, WP:BLPSOURCE. The problem of an article *written* in a tabloid style containing tabloid-attractive...

I have no preference to any date being added, as long as it meets WP:BLPSOURCES.--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:34, 13 October 2013 (UTC) Please keep discussion...

in a relationship. In my view, this is clearly not acceptable per WP:BLPSOURCES (Flack is dead, but the partner making the claim isn't, so the BLP criteria...

know is that it's supposed to be from some part of WP:BLP other than WP:BLPSOURCES. Is it going to take yet another admin intervention to put a stop to your...

neutrally, sourced to RS's, verifiable, and otherwise complies with WP:BLPSOURCES. Both the initial accusation, the source of the accusation, and the later...

confidential investigation) - [24] and the aforementioned HV1 report (WP:BLPSOURCES?). Icewhiz (talk) 16:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC) HV1 is, it claims, an on-line...

The New York Post[13] and New York Daily News[14]. I realize that WP:BLPSOURCES argues against inclusion of this material: "Material should not be added...

typically expected to be supported by citations to reliable sources per WP:BLPSOURCES and can be removed when it isn't. In principle, more contentious claims...

October 2007 (UTC) I think everything is sourced now - shall I remove the {{BLPsources}}? --h2g2bob (talk) 23:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC) The above is an archived...

"major" contributor to his field), so there is self-promotion as well as BLPSOURCES issues here. Coretheapple (talk) 15:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC) LexaDlawok...

BLPN, NORN and VP discussions, but is embedded in WP:BLPBALANCE and WP:BLPSOURCES most importantly. wumbolo ^^^ 17:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC) This is the third...

understand? My very best wishes (talk) 04:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC) For BLPSOURCES to be satisfied, those sources need to be actually referenced in (and...

closure, and nobody was apparently able to find any during the AfD. WP:BLPSOURCES, part of the main BLP policy, provides: "Wikipedia's sourcing policy,...

inline citation; material not meeting this standard may be removed." WP:BLPSOURCES (2) Verifiability is an issue WP:VERIFY "In the English Wikipedia, verifiability...

an impartial manner. Better sourcing is also needed to comply with WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:SYNTH policies per the concerns raised by DClemens . Leaving an...

response by Réhahn is also cited, also hosted by Matca. Concerns: [[WP:BLPSOURCES]]: Matca is a small, independent online publication primarily run by photographers...

BLPOPINION can be done in userspace. Andre🚐 05:30, 4 May 2026 (UTC) [ WP:BLPSOURCES, WP:BLPSELFPUB, WP:BLPGOSSIP Andre🚐 17:25, 4 May 2026 (UTC)] Delete per...

and the Daily Mirror (five references each) good sources for a BLP? WP:BLPSOURCES instructs to avoid using such sources on BLPs, let alone featured articles...

(talk) 14:03, 7 August 2019 (UTC) That also wouldn't be very good. WP:BLPSOURCES requires decent, non-tabloid sourcing for anything on a BLP. --82.132...

added to it about his supposed children seems really questionable per WP:BLPSOURCES. I've removed it for now, but it would be nice if others could also take...

@Dclemens1971 I get that, but that is not the cogent policy here. WP:BLPSOURCES external to notability policy but equally important is at play here. We...

claim that Ahunt has gone against WP:V, WP:RS/QUOTE, WP:RSCONTEXT, WP:BLPSOURCE, WP:BLPUNDEL. (It might be too early to add WP:DUE.) Who agrees or disagrees...

part on tabloid sources and low-quality gossip sites, which violates WP:BLPSOURCES. FACR 1(d): "neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias: The article...

be categorized as "Partner" of Benedict Cumberbatch to comply with WP:BLPSOURCES, WP:GRAPEVINE, and WP:BLPGOSSIP as evidenced in the following: 1. Source...

and Christian Science Monitor The Daily Mail is used as a source. WP:BLPSOURCES says that material only supported by tabloid journalism should not be...

are removed because of concerns that they do not comply with policy WP:BLPSOURCE, you have the burden of proving that it does before you can readd it....

disruption continues. JFHJr (㊟) 02:36, 14 May 2026 (UTC) Raising a WP:BLPSOURCES issue at Ashley Jones for review. Full disclosure: I have a COI on this...

bullet lists, which are unsourced and can be removed according to WP:BLPSOURCES. - MrX 21:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC) Okay. I've come across this as regrettably...

cautions against for living persons, and MuslimMatters, a group blog. WP:BLPSOURCES says contentious material sourced this way "should be removed immediately...

WP:BLP section concerning Somali Americans,[21] that of which per WP:BLPSOURCES would not be permitted even if Minnesota Reformer didn't have issues with...

emphasis given to chart stats, this is still a BLP so in major breach of WP:BLPSOURCES (relying as it does on primary sources, in breach of WP:PTS). Blows WP:ANYBIO...

September 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom. No SIGCOV in independent RS; fails WP:BLPSOURCES/WP:ANYBIO. —Fortuna, imperatrix 15:09, 29 September 2025 (UTC) Delete...

created. Those or variants are currently used on Kalki Bhagawan - WP:BLPSOURCES concerns there - URL https://web.archive.org/web/20200701154509/https://newsmeter...

against high-quality reliable sources ..." (WP:WIAFA). This is a BLP, so WP:BLPSOURCES applies too. It's about a woman, so it would be good if you could avoid...

JSTOR · TWL) Entirely based on a single non-independent source. Fails WP:BLPSOURCES (WP:DEL-REASON # 9) and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 03:31, 31 May 2026 (UTC)...

sourcing exists in the body, it should be reflected here per WP:LEADCITE/WP:BLPSOURCE; if not, the sentence should be removed or attributed and qualified per...

secondary sources with careful attribution, as required by WP:BLP/WP:BLPSOURCES. Contentious material about living persons must be written conservatively...

page notes on both the article and the Deaths in 2025 list citing WP:BLPSOURCES concerns. Two editors have been reverting to restore the disputed poorly...

living people, as well as the general biography guidelines. Please see WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:ANYBIO. @SilhouetteCastle: please do not reply to this comment;...

that has been challenged") Remove both the source and the associated article passage. (WP:BLPSOURCE/WP:UNDUE/WP:EXTRAORDINARY/WP:MEDRS situations) ”...

2 August 2025 (UTC) Good catch, that was an egregious violation of WP:BLPSOURCE. I went ahead and deleted it. Generalrelative (talk) 00:41, 2 August 2025...

February 2025 (UTC) Delete. No indication that the article passes WP:BLP or BLPSOURCES; this is a fundamental failure. When his notability is established in...

(talk) 21:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC) Draftify or delete per WP:ANYBIO and BLPSOURCES. Why was this accepted at NPR? Perhaps they know of sources we don't?...

resume.  GuardianH  22:08, 16 March 2025 (UTC) Delete. Fails GNG and BLPSOURCES: vastly over-reliant on primary sources (see WP:PTS) rather than independent...

they can be verified per WP:ABOUTSELF, adhering to the basic rules of WP:BLPSOURCES. Pinging @NegativeMP1, Vrxces, and Madeleine961: for possible reconsideration...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:BLPSOURCES. Page created over a decade ago, no sources have been attached nor can...

particular reference to ANYBIO (done nothing to fulfil any criteria), BLPSOURCES (no independent, reliable third party sources support an assertion of...

violation of WP:BLPRESTORE (once a good-faith objection was known) and WP:BLPSOURCES. Claims that "primary sources are preferred to secondary ones" betray...

10:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC) Delete: This entire article is a huge WP:BLPSOURCES violation and it probably could've been blanked without discussion. I...