This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
subject to case-by-case consensus. Shortcuts WP:BLPCATWP:BLPCAT WP:BLPLISTWP:BLPLIST Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for each...
Click to read more »16 December 2013 (UTC) I mistyped it but moved it to User:Sportfan5000/BLPlist It looks better now, User:Sportfan5000 is still your userpage though so...
Click to read more »with similar content, notably including the extensive User:Sportfan5000/BLPlist (which was discussed at MfD but kept.) ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 05:09, 9 January...
Click to read more »21:26, 27 July 2016 (UTC) Keep This does seem to pass WP:NLIST and WP:BLPLIST in that every single person except one is notable . And the act of appearing...
Click to read more »on the chopping block I think. Specific policy is WP:LISTPEOPLE and WP:BLPLIST. Bremps... 00:43, 7 February 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »an absolute requirement in BLP-impacting articles, even lists, per WP:BLPLIST. As there are no sources at all for the overwhelming majority of the article...
Click to read more »should be deleted for this reason. Additionally, there are WP:MINORS and WP:BLPLIST issues with this list. 4meter4 (talk) 03:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC) Template:BLPlist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Unused template; apparently...
Click to read more »(UTC) You added a biography of a non-notable living person to a list (WP:BLPLIST) based on an exceptionally poor source (WP:RS)... — Rhododendrites talk...
Click to read more »non-notable people with references, therefore it violates WP:BLPNAME or WP:BLPLIST. Absolutiva (talk) 04:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC) I think it clearly passes...
Click to read more »that was split from the RfC discussion, also that fails WP:NLIST and WP:BLPLISTS. MirrorPlanet (talk) 01:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) In the case of Sportfan5000, though, User talk:Sportfan5000/BLPlist was deleted by Tokyogirl79 at "06:48, 22 March 2014" because it was the...
Click to read more »an absolute requirement in BLP-impacting articles, even lists, per WP:BLPLIST. As there are no sources at all for the overwhelming majority of the article...
Click to read more »21:26, 27 July 2016 (UTC) Keep This does seem to pass WP:NLIST and WP:BLPLIST in that every single person except one is notable . And the act of appearing...
Click to read more »(UTC) You added a biography of a non-notable living person to a list (WP:BLPLIST) based on an exceptionally poor source (WP:RS)... — Rhododendrites talk...
Click to read more »as well, though the nearest thing I can find on that specifically is WP:BLPLIST. (It's complicated in the case of "Jewish", because that can refer to ethnicity...
Click to read more »should be deleted for this reason. Additionally, there are WP:MINORS and WP:BLPLIST issues with this list. 4meter4 (talk) 03:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »non-notable people with references, therefore it violates WP:BLPNAME or WP:BLPLIST. Absolutiva (talk) 04:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC) I think it clearly passes...
Click to read more »even if we want to disregard that consensus. I see a parallel to the WP:BLPLIST policy, an excerpt from which states - "Categories regarding religious...
Click to read more »on the chopping block I think. Specific policy is WP:LISTPEOPLE and WP:BLPLIST. Bremps... 00:43, 7 February 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »that was split from the RfC discussion, also that fails WP:NLIST and WP:BLPLISTS. MirrorPlanet (talk) 01:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »