Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Battle for Dream Island (BFDI) is an American animated web series on YouTube created by twin brothers Cary and Michael Huang. The show, which as of 2026...
Click to read more »The essay WP:BFDI explains how the web series Battle for Dream Island had no Wikipedia article because popularity does not guarantee notability. [Sarcastic...
Click to read more »about until November 2025. However, just because there is now an article for BFDI does not mean that articles can be created for each and every location, character...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) BFDI:TPOT (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Now playing: BFDI:TPOT 4: Gardening...
Click to read more »Battle for Dream Island (BFDI) is an animated web series on YouTube created by Cary and Michael Huang, published on the YouTube channel Jacknjellify. For...
Click to read more »photographer on BFDI, especially with this blurry photo on Commons. [April Fools!] αβ135talk 03:27, 1 April 2026 (UTC) Redirect to WP:Why is BFDI on Wikipedia...
Click to read more »bfdi.tv: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en...
Click to read more »20:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC) Draft:Battle for BFDI (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:BFDI TheWikipede (talk) 19:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Over * Pppery * it has begun... 00:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia? (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This Wikipedia...
Click to read more »delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:22, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Draft:Battle For Dream Island (BFDI) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Draft:Battle For Dream Island:...
Click to read more »Guide to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! BFDI (Franchise) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »closure) Tol | talk | contribs 19:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC) Draft:Battle for BFDI (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Duplicate of the page Draft:Battle...
Click to read more »Wikipedia page titles separated by commas. This will make it so BFDI enjoyers can listen why BFDI doesnt have a respective article easier and more accessible...
Click to read more »Huang (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Part of the ongoing BFDI onslaught. Should be deleted and salted as yet another attempt to Trojan...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Speedy Delete. BFDI may be popular, but the channel itself isn't exactly notable, Maybe have an article for BFDI itself, but there's not really...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Subjective importance Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability Wikipedia:Popularity does not guarantee notability Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia?...
Click to read more »November 2022 (UTC) I'm pretty sure that he's notablr. Besides his work on the BFDI franchise, he also worked as an animator on Inanimate Insanity , is showrunner...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Battle for BFDI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this page. The result was redirect to BFDI. April Fools' Day is over (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions •...
Click to read more »(Draft:2763 (number)) being related to BFDI, even in the edit history and in the author's log and contribs; both BFDI and the aforementioned draft are merely...
Click to read more »non-notable number. In addition, it violates WP:BFDI as the article is a character from the show BFDI. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:26, 1...
Click to read more »15:54, 2 November 2025 (UTC) Keep: Consensus at BFDI’s deletion review made it pretty clear that BFDI has enough reliable sources to warrant its own article...
Click to read more »deleted anyway, per WP:GNG and WP:BFDI. —πυθονκοδερ (ταλκ | κοντριβς) 21:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC) Delete anyway per WP:BFDI. Seems to have bypassed our title...
Click to read more »Draft:Object show (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:COATRACK for BFDI, another attempt to shoehorn this topic into Wikipedia (excuse the mixed...
Click to read more »not identical to the deleted drafts, but still an attempt to keep the WP:BFDI info alive on Wikipedia. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:44, 20 February 2023...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Wikipedia:Perché BFDI non era su Wikipedia? (non-admin closure) αβ135talk 03:13, 3 April 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 September 2020 (UTC) File:BFDI Recommended characters.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded...
Click to read more »them, they would be permitted just like anything else. The purpose of WP:BFDI is not to tell editors that the thing they like is categorically excluded...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) Article is about a non-notable topic. Also, see WP:BFDI. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 00:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Oh, and the previous...
Click to read more »TacoBeetsCentipede (talk) 23:49, 28 December 2025 (UTC) Per WP:BFDICRUFT, just because BFDI is on Wikipedia does not mean every character, location, or scene should...
Click to read more »01:20, 1 April 2026 (UTC) on behalf of X Can we delete this comment per WP:BFDI? Carson004 (talk) 02:11, 1 April 2026 (UTC) Delete it for all I care... and...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:BFDI as obvious attempt to avoid existing title restrictions as it appears to be an article on BFDI's The Power of Two (TPOT)...
Click to read more »before the horse. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:29, 2 November 2025 (UTC) Speedy delete bfdi has an article already. DiamondCat22 (talk) 17:25, 3 November 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Most of the coverage seems to be about BFDI and I don't think it passes GNG. The non-BFDI related information is trivial and doesn't establish...
Click to read more »article of the brothers cary and Michael huang is bout that and the bfdi article is about bfdi. Dani Bay (talk) 20:38, 12 May 2026 (UTC) Keep as both articles...
Click to read more »and undue weight Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability Wikipedia:Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Wikipedia:Not every...
Click to read more »purpose was getting ac and moving Draft:Object show, an attempt to promote BFDI again. SANTADICAE🎅 17:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC) Accused parties may also...
Click to read more »looking for BFDI (Battle for Dream Island). Of course, that page doesn’t exist and probably won’t for a while, so it should be retargeted to WP:BFDI. Also,...
Click to read more »disruptive for reasons other than conflict of interest. Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia? – a case study on ultras regarding a once non-notable topic...
Click to read more »Style/Trivia sections Wikipedia:Fancruft Wikipedia:Subjective importance Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia? Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not TV Tropes...
Click to read more »a blatant hoax. interstatefive 19:46, 1 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:BFDI as a non-notable character. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 23:52,...
Click to read more »when assessing notability, which was closed as 'no consensus' Talk:Mark Dice/Archive 6#YouTube subscriber count Wikipedia:Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia?...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Fancruft Wikipedia:Do not call things cruft Wikipedia:Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Wikipedia:Not all...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete and drown in an ocean’s worth of salt this is getting annoying. BFDI is like some sort of invasive species on WP at this point. Dronebogus (talk)...
Click to read more »it keeps being wrongfully moved into other mainspace titles (e.g. List of BFDI characters or List of BattIe for Dream lsIand characters), it can be move...
Click to read more »Based on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle For Dream Island (BFDI), it seems unlikely that this is the correct master. (Could it be...
Click to read more »The Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (BfDI, German: Bundesbeauftragter für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete. Fiction in the "object show" genre, that resembles the WP:BFDI universe, as a derivative of sorts.—Alalch E. 21:07, 7 June 2023 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »permanent Wikipedia article. Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia? Wikipedia:Obscure does not mean not notable, the opposite...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:BFDI and WP:TPOT...[April Fools!] AlphaBeta135 talk 13:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »per WP:ADS. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 15:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC) Hence why BFDI is banned on Wikipedia. AlphaBeta135talk 15:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC) Redirect...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability Wikipedia:Why should I care? Wikipedia:No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia?...
Click to read more »Template:Trivia List of Wikipedia articles with trivia sections Wikipedia:Fancruft Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Fandom Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia?...
Click to read more »for the birds, not to mention that it sounds like a disease. Delete per WP:BFDI. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 19:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC) Vote for the contestant...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was "banned from Wikipedia" (AlphaBeta135 BFDI). (non-admin closure) AlphaBeta135 talk 23:58, 2 April 2025 (UTC) AfDs...
Click to read more »things cruft Wikipedia:"In popular culture" content Wikipedia:Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Wikipedia:Listcruft...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Trivial mentions Wikipedia:Existence doesn't warrant a statement Wikipedia:No one cares about your garage band Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia?...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) Non-notable web series. See also WP:BFDI. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 18:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC) Question -...
Click to read more »for deletion/Common outcomes Wikipedia:Pokémon test Wikipedia:Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Wikipedia:Not all...
Click to read more »If BFDI fans are lucky enough to find significant reliable coverage of the Huang twins (regardless of whether or not those sources even mention BFDI at...
Click to read more »notable enough. OneWingedKremling (talk) 23:02, 9 January 2026 (UTC) see WP:BFDI brachy08 (chat here lol) 02:53, 9 January 2026 (UTC) Delete: There's just...
Click to read more »sources Wikipedia:Search engine test Wikipedia:Verifiability Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia? Content distributed primarily through the web which does...
Click to read more »viewpoint that puts it into the perspective of Wikipedia (like, for example, WP:BFDI does) but rather reads like a kind of soapbox to share your opinions regarding...
Click to read more »01:07, 27 May 2026 (UTC) simply put, I like Doors, but this is another WP:BFDI situation brachy08 (chat here lol) 01:09, 27 May 2026 (UTC) Strongly redirect...
Click to read more »22:18, 8 November 2025 (UTC) The recent creation of Battle for Dream Island (BFDI) after so long has increased editing activity from fans of the series excited...
Click to read more »secondary source information to confirm notability. It's a textbook case of WP:BFDI to me, in that despite Jamie Paige undeniably being popular, there isn't...
Click to read more »TheSilksongPikmin (talk | contribs) 00:39, 9 November 2025 (UTC) Keep: BFDI as a whole passes through GNG, and it's also a series of episodes, per Flower/IPOfAFlower...
Click to read more »22:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC) Unfortunately, it seems this may be yet another WP:BFDI situation. Aaron Liu (talk) 01:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC) Delete: Searching on...
Click to read more »we should find a bit more sources... The article isn't as detailed as the BFDI article (another thing I like that suffered from notability problems), but...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) Object shows probably fall under WP:BFDI TheWikipede (talk) 20:02, 8 November 2024 (UTC) Weak Keep - The Dream Island...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:HARASSMENT and WP:BFDI[April Fools!] AlphaBeta135 talk 11:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC) Send itself to...
Click to read more »article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing Wikipedia:Minimum coverage Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia? Wikipedia:Does deletion help?...
Click to read more »articles. Wikipedia:Protection policy Wikipedia:Spam blacklist Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia? User:TheBuddy92/Willy on Wheels: A Case Study...
Click to read more »be made to this section. The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:BFDI. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions •...
Click to read more »on the Uncyclopedia article. Q7 and BFDI go quiet until today when the protection on the article expires and BFDI comes back immediately to push the ...
Click to read more »abuse/Orangemoody User:TheBuddy92/Willy on Wheels: A Case Study Wikipedia:Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia? § Deletions Wikipedia:Nuke "Wikipedia Statistics - Tables...
Click to read more »secondary source information to confirm notability. It's a textbook case of WP:BFDI to me, in that despite Jamie Paige undeniably being popular, there isn't...
Click to read more »secondary source information to confirm notability. It's a textbook case of WP:BFDI to me, in that despite Jamie Paige undeniably being popular, there isn't...
Click to read more »November 2025 (UTC) Keep since BFDI already qualifies for WP:GNG, and object shows are mentioned a few times in the BFDI article. DiscoveringMysteries03...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: shop.jacknjellify.com/products/bfdi-character-guide?variant=41685007138980 (R/Xmeta/L) 2023-02-01 21:16:23 (UTC):...
Click to read more »Notability Wikipedia:Existence does not prove notability Wikipedia:No one cares about your garage band Wikipedia:Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia? – a case study...
Click to read more »is bad. Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia? was nominated for deletion because apparently we are all BFDI fans. BFDI was nominated for deletion...
Click to read more »2027 (See you in 2027~) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia? (Sent to Dream Island) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WTF...
Click to read more »(Absolute AI garbage, see Wikipedia talk:Why is BFDI not allowed on Wikipedia?#A news website covered BFDI) https://twitter.com/FamousBirthdays/status/1583757315815006208...
Click to read more »essay first) Did you want to see an article about BFDI? (3) Did you help create the article about BFDI? (20) Had you checked for independent and reliable...
Click to read more »secondary source information to confirm notability. It's a textbook case of WP:BFDI to me, in that despite Jamie Paige undeniably being popular, there isn't...
Click to read more »First to verify that BFDI is notable enough to warrant making a Wikipedia page, which is quite obvious. Second, and the one BFDI always struggled with...
Click to read more »found a not insignificant amount of sources... of which none are related to bfdi, which is really funny https://www.businessinsider.com/meta-laid-me-off-...
Click to read more »December 2025 (UTC) Delete We don't have much BFDI articles, so this navbox is pointless. I don't see many more BFDI/object shows becoming articles in the future...
Click to read more »(Library) (Sandbox) 18:32, 16 May 2026 (UTC) I am not BurkinaFasoDIEditor, the BFDI in my username stands for Battle for Dream Island. BFDIEditor (talk) 18:51...
Click to read more »big Adventure (keep) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle for BFDI (2nd nomination) (speedy delete) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User...
Click to read more »15:54, 2 November 2025 (UTC) Keep: Consensus at BFDI’s deletion review made it pretty clear that BFDI has enough reliable sources to warrant its own article...
Click to read more »secondary source information to confirm notability. It's a textbook case of WP:BFDI to me, in that despite Jamie Paige undeniably being popular, there isn't...
Click to read more »Draft:Windows Vista (2021 film) Draft:Yellow Face Ate My M&M's Draft:The BFDI Movie Draft:Object Stuff: The Movie Draft:Object Stuff Bunch of fan content...
Click to read more »variation on this title preemptively so this doesn’t turn into the next WP:BFDI Dronebogus (talk) 15:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC) I support mass-salting as...
Click to read more »notability (page views are a factor but they're not sufficient; see Wikipedia:BFDI for the difference between interest in the subject and notability). That's...
Click to read more »article, and in turn not independent. See the source assessment page used for BFDI. Jude Halley (talk) 03:05, 16 December 2025 (UTC) Maybe just delete the article...
Click to read more »BFDI not allowed on Wikipedia? (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] Eleven Words of Wisdom → Wikipedia:Why is BFDI...
Click to read more »secondary source information to confirm notability. It's a textbook case of WP:BFDI to me, in that despite Jamie Paige undeniably being popular, there isn't...
Click to read more »Insanity in whole, only covers it being spawned out of existence because of BFDI. This leaves me to believe that the Inanimate Insanity redirect should be...
Click to read more »coverage other than in the summer of 2013. I recently stumbled across WP:Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia? which discusses why a very popular YouTube series with...
Click to read more »(talk) 08:21, 21 May 2026 (UTC) I feel like Ongezellig is now the new WP:BFDI, where popular =/= notable is very much noticeable. Except of an indie franchise...
Click to read more »ground for vandalism i have a feeling we are going to have to give this the BFDI treatment because of all the young kids wanting to make an article on it...
Click to read more »independent of the subject, these do not demonstrate notability. (e.g. WP:BFDI) ConeKota (talk) 00:00, 3 April 2026 (UTC) Delete: Non-notable WP:BLP with...
Click to read more »(March 2019) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle For Dream Island (BFDI) (May 2019) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle for Dream Island (February...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia? was nominated for deletion as irrelevant. Someone else can replace the nominator's role of photographing BFDI stuff. The...
Click to read more »secondary source information to confirm notability. It's a textbook case of WP:BFDI to me, in that despite Jamie Paige undeniably being popular, there isn't...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »01:20, 1 April 2026 (UTC) on behalf of X Can we delete this comment per WP:BFDI? Carson004 (talk) 02:11, 1 April 2026 (UTC) Delete it for all I care... and...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »here's a quote from WP:BFDI itself (most related parts highlighted in bold): In fact, several users have used the term "WP:BFDI" to broadly refer to any...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »exist but was deleted by consensus, thus establishing precedent (see WP:BFDI). Sometimes arguments are made that other articles have been put forward...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »Ferb: The Soundtrack Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia? Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Special:DeletePage Wikipedia:Miscellany...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »For Dream Island (BFDI), Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle for BFB, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle for BFDI, and Wikipedia:Miscellany...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »to keep this page. thetree284 (talk and edits) 00:19, 1 April 2025 (UTC) BFDI: The Power of Two Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 00:23, 1 April 2025 (UTC) r/woooosh...
Click to read more »Wikiman2230 (talk · contribs) Draft:BFDI (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Could someone lift the rejection to a normal decline...
Click to read more »creating one-line stub-class articles for every single BFDI episode, character, merchandise, and other BFDI stuff? (This is counted as two questions) Icepinner...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »time. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 01:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC) why isn't BFDI on Wikipedia, when they won the 2021 cartoon crave awards? Somecoolguy12345...
Click to read more »16:51, 7 July 2026 (UTC) Comment What's the difference between this and the BFDI episodes AfD? 1timeuse75 (talk) 17:06, 7 July 2026 (UTC) I couldn't tell...
Click to read more »Dream Island. There are also the drafts Draft:List of BFDI:TPOT episodes, Draft:List of Battle for BFDI episodes, and Draft:List_of_BFDIA_episodes. — Preceding...
Click to read more »super annoying This user likes to watch Annoying Orange. linked pages {{User BFDI}} This user likes to watch Battle for Dream Island linked pages {{User MechWest}}...
Click to read more »Ervin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) User being reported FireyBFDI (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)...
Click to read more »wondering why you rejected it? LoudCasaGumInsanityBFDI (talk) 22:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC) LoudCasaGumInsanityBFDI Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. The reason...
Click to read more »and for 15 years, it didn't have a Wikipedia article. (See also Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia?) Bernie Sanders' Dank Meme Stash A Facebook group dedicated...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »Island and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle For Dream Island (BFDI). M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 05:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC) The discussion...
Click to read more »blog about a non-notable award and a ref to a commercial site that sells BFDI-related merchandise have been added. Neither of those support notability...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this discussion. I would like to say that BFDI has caused a major industry online in YouTube per se, it has a big fan base...
Click to read more »two was zeroed out. The result was "banned from Wikipedia" (AlphaBeta135 BFDI). Privacy policy and terms of service were nominated for deletion because...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) BFDI:TPOT (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Now playing: BFDI:TPOT 4: Gardening...
Click to read more »Beefy die [170] An in-joke in the Battle for Dream Island fandom where "BFDI" is mispronounced as such by text-to-speech voices. Was also a redirect to...
Click to read more »21 30 Wikipedia:Systemic bias 14303 291 839 4731.03 31 Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia? 1396 84 1913 4679.96 32 Wikipedia:Humor 4900 113 1661 4501...
Click to read more »notable because it does not pass the GNG and thus does not have a page (WP:BFDI). In this instance, the character's storyline and evolution are heavily discussed...
Click to read more »harm the documentation of internet-born topics and medias (aka. the whole BFDI situation from awhile back) In the furry community specifically, YonKaGor...
Click to read more »meanings. BFDI is not notable. That's why BFDI exists, but redirects to a German federal agency most likely not searched for by users entering "BFDI" into...
Click to read more »listing anchor stores? Also, some users tried to create an article about BFDI, but it got deleted soon. And when attempting to create again, its name or...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »be a disambiguation page is like having BFDI be a disambiguation page that simply includes BFDI and the BfDI. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 19:36, 5 December...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »Confusing", even though it was filled with Pokémon birds Then it was "General BFDI-foolery" Then it was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Summer Olympics...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) This user thinks it was really worth it to wait 15 years to the BFDI article to be removed from the title blacklist based on this [1], a bit buggy...
Click to read more »please purchase the full version for $999. Cbuumf gps Esfbn Jtmboe WP:BFDI's former main picture Proper pronunciation of GIF Is Naperville 30 minutes...
Click to read more »Wait, what? Random article you have 5 clicks to get to jesus Wikipedia.io Bfdi is an indie animated web series similar to parkour civilization and was made...
Click to read more »subject, as it's pretty obvious this is a camel's-nose attempt to backdoor in BfDI promotion. Op-ed where the subject is only name-dropped in any event. https://thecampoclaw...
Click to read more »Please, Another Wiki User the 2nd (talk) 16:56, 11 June 2020 (UTC) What is BFDI and OSC? thanks. Schazjmd (talk) 17:03, 11 June 2020 (UTC) My thoughts exactly...
Click to read more »2022 (UTC) Speedy Delete. BFDI may be popular, but the channel itself isn't exactly notable, Maybe have an article for BFDI itself, but there's not really...
Click to read more »Public interest also doesn't translate into notability. See something like WP:BFDI, a series that has millions of views but has no article. As of right now...
Click to read more »November 2022 (UTC) I'm pretty sure that he's notablr. Besides his work on the BFDI franchise, he also worked as an animator on Inanimate Insanity , is showrunner...
Click to read more »deletion/Battle for Dream Island. ... discospinster talk 21:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC) BFDI (Franchise) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »see Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion#MFD request: Wikipedia:Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia? —Alalch E. 13:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC) can you please...
Click to read more »07:20, 3 April 2021 (UTC) It’s Wikipedia:Wikipedia Challenges, I have a BFDI-related one and you can suggest your own. Another Wiki User the 2nd (talk)...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »request has been declined. Please do not modify it. Target of redirect: ((BFDI)) Reason: An abbreviation Source (if applicable): Bfdiman (talk) 22:43, 5...
Click to read more »2023 (UTC) Earlier this month, I started a section on the talk page of WP:BFDI containing a source assessment table pertinent to the topic of Scale of the...
Click to read more »An article on this topic in particular is unlikely to be approved. See WP:BFDI for explanations. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 02:22...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »about aspects that sources don't care about. And trying to compare this to BFDI is ridiculous considering that there literally are multiple sources covering...
Click to read more »alias for him) but it now redirects to BFDI. Nowhere is anything about the name "Yoyle Cake" said at the BFDI article, so I propose that these redirects...
Click to read more »non-notable number. In addition, it violates WP:BFDI as the article is a character from the show BFDI. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:26, 1...
Click to read more »secondary source information to confirm notability. It's a textbook case of WP:BFDI to me, in that despite Jamie Paige undeniably being popular, there isn't...
Click to read more »February 2021 (UTC) why is BFDI Not an article? Bondstunic (talk) 16:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC) @Bondstunic: Either because BFDI does not meet Wikipedia's...
Click to read more »If BFDI fans are lucky enough to find significant reliable coverage of the Huang twins (regardless of whether or not those sources even mention BFDI at...
Click to read more »user Datestamp: 18:49, 23 November 2022 (UTC) Reason: I'm not a big fan of BFDI anymore and I think I need to update my profile Bfdifan2006 (talk) 18:49...
Click to read more »was Bielefeld no longer exists, demolition will commence on 31 April 2023. BFDI was nominated for deletion for being too violent and very much banned. It...
Click to read more »October 2024 (UTC) @Kaixvny, this isn't the place to discuss the inclusion of BFDI or any other article, but instead for Parkour Civilization, which should...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »Unmentioned and apparently non-notable comic book series that was a precursor to BFDI. There was discussion, with minimal participation, at Talk:Battle for Dream...
Click to read more »adding it to the article will be difficult, but that's an old problem with WP:BFDI). The redirect has been accessed about 30 times on its second day, and more...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »(notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). Per WP:BFDICRUFT, just because BFDI has an article does not mean that every character, place, or episode should...
Click to read more »appeal for redirect creation as soon as I'm told where to do so. (Via WP:BFDI--h/t WP:Deletion review/Perennial requests [h/t WP:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:K...
Click to read more »favorite object shows it has 20 circles and 14 episodes all named circle (BFDI has 63 episodes so far for comparison) Somecoolguy12345 (talk) 15:11, 30...
Click to read more »sources. Conyo14 (talk) 16:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC) I think this is a WP:BFDI situation where there should be good sources, but there simply isn't. Ca...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »For Dream Island (BFDI), Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle for BFB, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle for BFDI, and Wikipedia:Miscellany...
Click to read more »For Dream Island (BFDI), Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle for BFB, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle for BFDI, and Wikipedia:Miscellany...
Click to read more »consistently removing content on pages - sure there are some edits to WP:BFDI and its talk page, but the (very wide) ranges have a variety of edits to...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »there's already articles that exist on other pages like a cary Huang in BFDI and cary Huang still gets to have a article? Misterpotatoman (talk) 00:32...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »of guideline or policy. If notability came from solely statistics, then BFDI would have an article by now with how many views that series has racked up...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »by CambridgeBayWeather on 12 Feb 2021; discussion 02 Feb 2021 – Draft:The BFDI Movie MfDed by TheCartoonEditor was closed as delete by CambridgeBayWeather...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notable meme. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:59, 6 December 2024 (UTC) Delete as WP:BFDI-ish bare notability. 67.209.128.132 (talk) 15:26, 6 December 2024 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »unblock Battle For Dream Island. BFDI and Object Shows have been blocked on Wikipedia for a long time, due to BFDI not having "correct sources or something...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »copyrighted https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/logos2/images/d/d6/744px-Bfdi_logo.svg.png/revision/latest?cb=20180713050006 — Preceding unsigned comment...
Click to read more »(Multiple) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle For Dream Island (BFDI) (delete) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Voice blind auditions...
Click to read more »then all of BFDI 2603:9000:AD07:E100:5963:ED9E:94B2:7455 (talk) 11:54, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Declined We already have an article at BFDI...although I...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »it keeps being wrongfully moved into other mainspace titles (e.g. List of BFDI characters or List of BattIe for Dream lsIand characters), it can be move...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »here. If you want to change that, I think you'd have to go the way of WP:BFDI and hold an actual RfC on the matter, and have the community decide once...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »February. TSventon (talk) 16:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC) On the talk page of WP:BFDI the other day, an editor pondered the possibility of the YouTube channel...
Click to read more »of him; some didn't even mention him at all. This seems to be a clear WP:BFDI. Plant🌱man (talk) 08:14, 18 March 2025 (UTC) The above is preserved as an...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »popular items for which the sources do not exist to fulfill our standards. WP:BFDI as an item gets billions of views - but is not even notable enough for one...
Click to read more »(talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] BFDI TPOTBFDI TPOT → List of Battle for Dream Island episodes#Season 5 (talk ·...
Click to read more »both. Anyway Delete Happy Editing -- IAmChaos 09:17, 13 November 2025 (UTC) bfdi should probably have restrictions put on it first tbh consarn (talck) (contirbuton...
Click to read more »he is very popular, but that doesn’t constitute most things. Remember WP:BFDI lvrlol / sv1ad talk 14:36, 25 March 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »established purpose of redirects, and the burden of maintaining all these BFDI redirects with ever-changing targets is costly but if the community has decided...
Click to read more »(talk | contribs) 00:34, 25 June 2021 (UTC) Can someone make a page for BFDI and the object show genre? LaylaShyu (talk) 20:34, 23 June 2021 (UTC) Hello...
Click to read more »exact channel name that would fit better here, however that’s just another BFDI problem. | Two Responses crossed the area. Anything to discuss? 21:07, 5...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Most of the coverage seems to be about BFDI and I don't think it passes GNG. The non-BFDI related information is trivial and doesn't establish...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »WP:BFDI AlphaBeta135 talk 03:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC) Support - as per WP:BFDI, and the fact that the initials for the german name is "BfDI" User:Someone-123-321...
Click to read more »(pester) 12:39, 26 December 2025 (UTC) I've not been keeping track of all new BFDI creations, what existing articles would fit into Category:Huang brothers...
Click to read more »If not, please do now. While you're at it, you may find Wikipedia:Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia? instructive. BTW, that "Official Profile" you mentioned...
Click to read more »article of the brothers cary and Michael huang is bout that and the bfdi article is about bfdi. Dani Bay (talk) 20:38, 12 May 2026 (UTC) Keep as both articles...
Click to read more »TheSilksongPikmin (talk | contribs) 00:39, 9 November 2025 (UTC) Keep: BFDI as a whole passes through GNG, and it's also a series of episodes, per Flower/IPOfAFlower...
Click to read more »policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcuts WP:BFDIWP:BFDI WP:OSCWP:OSC WP:Object showWP:Object show This page in a nutshell: Popularity...
Click to read more »deleted anyway, per WP:GNG and WP:BFDI. —πυθονκοδερ (ταλκ | κοντριβς) 21:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC) Delete anyway per WP:BFDI. Seems to have bypassed our title...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »TacoBeetsCentipede (talk) 23:49, 28 December 2025 (UTC) Per WP:BFDICRUFT, just because BFDI is on Wikipedia does not mean every character, location, or scene should...
Click to read more »last DRV in August 2024, new sources about the web series have appeared: "'BFDI': Online series continues to soar", from The Citizen, 19 June 2025 "jacknjellify"...
Click to read more »and for 15 years, it didn't have a Wikipedia article. (See also Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia?) Bernie Sanders' Dank Meme Stash A Facebook group dedicated...
Click to read more »@9004805a You might want to have a look at WP:BFDI, as I suspect that Ongezellig is largely in the same situation BFDI was once in; being massively popular with...
Click to read more »noticed in the BFDI essay that Inanimate Insanity has a live link, which redirects to the "Cultural impact" section on the newly approved BFDI article despite...
Click to read more »very own anime mascot. (See Moe anthropomorphism above) Wikipedia:Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia? An entire essay dedicated to explaining how one particular...
Click to read more »discussion. So, I had made a page sending people to FANDOM for an article on BFDI (the web series) Option 1: Redirect all potential pages to the FANDOM Wiki...
Click to read more »20130824073837 Brexx sock disrupting article, Brexx sock now blocked 197 BFDI (talk · hist) Discospinster 20220527215851 Persistent [[WP:Vandalism|vandalism]]...
Click to read more »also" sections Another essay using this term is "Wikipedia:Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it" — wbm1058 (talk)...
Click to read more »secondary source information to confirm notability. It's a textbook case of WP:BFDI to me, in that despite Jamie Paige undeniably being popular, there isn't...
Click to read more »decided to create a source assessment table over at the talk page of WP:BFDI listing sources for the topic of Scale of the Universe. While only one source...
Click to read more »that? Drjump! (talk) 00:36, 16 January 2023 (UTC) Whatever you mean by "BFDI", Drjump!, would you be able to use reliable sources to demonstrate that...
Click to read more »happened fairly late in the article's history. See WP:BFDI#List of deletion nominations and WP:BFDI#List of publicly logged deletions if this is the first...
Click to read more »sources. Conyo14 (talk) 16:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC) I think this is a WP:BFDI situation where there should be good sources, but there simply isn't. Ca...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »(talk) 16:17, 19 October 2024 (UTC) Also, there is a Scholastic book of a BFDI character guide. Unbiased source as it’s done by Cary and Scholastic. Xanzs...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »a blatant hoax. interstatefive 19:46, 1 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:BFDI as a non-notable character. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 23:52,...
Click to read more »notable enough. OneWingedKremling (talk) 23:02, 9 January 2026 (UTC) see WP:BFDI brachy08 (chat here lol) 02:53, 9 January 2026 (UTC) Delete: There's just...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »about object shows including BFDI Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 https://www.pluggedin.com/youtube-reviews/jacknjellify/ Article about BFDI Yes Yes ? Yes 4 https://www...
Click to read more »isn't severe enough to warrant ANI, considering he has only created one BFDI article and submitted one object show draft (in which, removing LLM slop...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »page has some information about BFDI on Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 04:09, 28 May 2023 (UTC) To summarise the essay, BFDI is no longer permitted on Wikipedia...
Click to read more »all the BFDI articles restored, which the community does not seem to be in favor of. NB: while I am in the protection logs of some of the BFDI related...
Click to read more »notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it Masking the lack...
Click to read more »Smith (disambiguation) by CabinetCavers on 20 Mar 2026 29 Mar 2026 – Draft:BFDI (disambiguation) submitted for AfC by Wikiman2230 was rejected by TheTechie...
Click to read more »< November 3 November 5 > This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 4, 2025. Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects...
Click to read more »Maproom (talk) 18:30, 30 April 2023 (UTC) I think it's the continuation of BFDI he's referring to. UpToTwentyHours (talk) 19:01, 30 April 2023 (UTC) Oh nevermind...
Click to read more »for the birds, not to mention that it sounds like a disease. Delete per WP:BFDI. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 19:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC) Vote for the contestant...
Click to read more »(UTC) BFDI is a semi-protected article, so edits to that page can only be made by registered users. You can place an edit request at Talk:BFDI using this...
Click to read more »very convinced that there are a lot of subjects that are nearly notable. WP:BFDI seems to be the only one I can think of. I'm sure there are more, but not...
Click to read more »strengthening its efforts against BFDI-related pages by salting and blacklisting them, but the only method of combating BFDI content in legitimate pages is...
Click to read more »Theda19 (talk) 16:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC) Can There ever be an article of Bfdi the animated series by following the Article rules? 2001:56A:FB31:8600:44C6:4D9B:4F3A:A78E...
Click to read more »Carson004 (his 2nd apartment after the Apartment Complex one last year) 25F BFDI studio (entire floor) 23F 2306 - A very low security bank vault 22F Discord...
Click to read more »Public interest also doesn't translate into notability. See something like WP:BFDI, a series that has millions of views but has no article. As of right now...
Click to read more »22:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC) Unfortunately, it seems this may be yet another WP:BFDI situation. Aaron Liu (talk) 01:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC) Delete: Searching on...
Click to read more »Underdwarf58 (talk) 14:08, 15 July 2025 (UTC) Hello! Is there a reason on why BFDI never have an article on its own? Why does this page got deleted way too...
Click to read more »(UTC) User:Charcoal Zenith/userboxes/BFDI can you add this to the appropriate userbox list please. btw i know that bfdi isn't on wikipedia but please dont...
Click to read more »only articles they created are BFDI related, is that promotion? The text is either copied from another draft or from the BFDI Wiki, which all aren’t necessarily...
Click to read more »that's not the case for the BFDI article. 1timeuse75 (talk) 14:10, 5 December 2025 (UTC) There are ten sources in the BFDI article. I would recommend finding...
Click to read more »article, and in turn not independent. See the source assessment page used for BFDI. Jude Halley (talk) 03:05, 16 December 2025 (UTC) Maybe just delete the article...
Click to read more »WT:BFDI, for to be able to specifically discuss about the source assessements (if as a full-fledged talk page), or to clearly indicate that BFDI-related...
Click to read more »that. For @HendrixanBFDIfan, BFDI is not allowed on Wikipedia since the topic is not notable for inclusion (See WP:BFDI). Due to persistent abuse, any...
Click to read more »(talk) 08:21, 21 May 2026 (UTC) I feel like Ongezellig is now the new WP:BFDI, where popular =/= notable is very much noticeable. Except of an indie franchise...
Click to read more »originally posted this in the wrong admin noticeboard.) This is pretty much a WP:BFDI-ish problem. A group of users have attempted to game the system for what...
Click to read more »(UTC) BFDI Watcher User Page (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) I would like to request for my user page (cant make one obv) . BFDI Watcher...
Click to read more »{{subst:uw-ewsoft}} or a similar notice. Trying to create the page gives a notice that "bfdi" is in the title blacklist. I wonder how the user was allowed to create the...
Click to read more »16:51, 7 July 2026 (UTC) Comment What's the difference between this and the BFDI episodes AfD? 1timeuse75 (talk) 17:06, 7 July 2026 (UTC) I couldn't tell...
Click to read more »edits like [37][38]. Note that this article is a kind of spin-off on WP:BFDI (BFDI). Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:44, 13 December 2025 (UTC) Extended confirmed...
Click to read more »made to this discussion. Some admins may have come into contact with WP:BFDI before. I'm WP:APPNOTEing this discussion: Talk:Battle_for_Dream_Island#Containment_breach...
Click to read more »Wikitext userbox where used {{User BFDI}} This user likes to watch Battle for Dream Island linked pages {{User no favorite number}} 8 This user doesn't...
Click to read more »coverage other than in the summer of 2013. I recently stumbled across WP:Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia? which discusses why a very popular YouTube series with...
Click to read more »harm the documentation of internet-born topics and medias (aka. the whole BFDI situation from awhile back) In the furry community specifically, YonKaGor...
Click to read more »independent of the subject, these do not demonstrate notability. (e.g. WP:BFDI) ConeKota (talk) 00:00, 3 April 2026 (UTC) Delete: Non-notable WP:BLP with...
Click to read more »notability (page views are a factor but they're not sufficient; see Wikipedia:BFDI for the difference between interest in the subject and notability). That's...
Click to read more »of guideline or policy. If notability came from solely statistics, then BFDI would have an article by now with how many views that series has racked up...
Click to read more »about aspects that sources don't care about. And trying to compare this to BFDI is ridiculous considering that there literally are multiple sources covering...
Click to read more »involves changing the capitalization. The only difference between this and BFDI is that there may be reliable sources that mention SssniperWolf. The ultras...
Click to read more »per WP:ADS. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 15:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC) Hence why BFDI is banned on Wikipedia. AlphaBeta135talk 15:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC) Redirect...
Click to read more »October 2024 (UTC) @Kaixvny, this isn't the place to discuss the inclusion of BFDI or any other article, but instead for Parkour Civilization, which should...
Click to read more »01:07, 27 May 2026 (UTC) simply put, I like Doors, but this is another WP:BFDI situation brachy08 (chat here lol) 01:09, 27 May 2026 (UTC) Strongly redirect...
Click to read more »hypothetical article about BFDI (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) this is a humorous essay presented as a article about bfdi Manueru-San MM98 (talk)...
Click to read more »If not, please do now. While you're at it, you may find Wikipedia:Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia? instructive. BTW, that "Official Profile" you mentioned...
Click to read more »popular items for which the sources do not exist to fulfill our standards. WP:BFDI as an item gets billions of views - but is not even notable enough for one...
Click to read more »notability beyond a shadow of a doubt. This seems to be a situation similar to WP:BFDI or others in WP:DRPR - subject with massive niche popularity but a lack of...
Click to read more »erennial_requests#Battle_for_Dream_Island. So the ultras who are fans of BFDI are now trying various ways to sneak in their articles. See also: Wikipedia:Articles...
Click to read more »Redirect to episode info in episode listing. Episode is listed as "BFDI 1a" and "BFDI 1b" in their respective video titles. Source (if applicable): ~2025-33284-82...
Click to read more »notable because it does not pass the GNG and thus does not have a page (WP:BFDI). In this instance, the character's storyline and evolution are heavily discussed...
Click to read more »notable for inclusion here. Being popular doesn't imply notability, see WP:BFDI which explains this for a similar popular yet non-notable topic. Children...
Click to read more »(talk) 03:00, 25 November 2024 (UTC) Not done, please see WP:BFDI. Thanks, charlotte 👸♥ 03:05, 25 November 2024 (UTC) Charles Barugahare ·...
Click to read more »editors) have vandalized the article to add information about BFDI, but have not seen WP:BFDI. As a result, the page should be protected. 24.115.255.37 (talk)...
Click to read more »January 1st of 2010. It has sparked an fandom filled with passionate creators. BFDI has a total of a billion views. Please make a page regarding the subject...
Click to read more »found a not insignificant amount of sources... of which none are related to bfdi, which is really funny https://www.businessinsider.com/meta-laid-me-off-...
Click to read more »redirect to meta runner. is this a notability problem ,like what happens to BFDI drafts? i'd love to try and actually make the page myself, but i have no...
Click to read more »Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:55, 9 December 2025 (UTC) Wikipedia_talk:Why_was_BFDI_not_on_Wikipedia?#Archiving_messed_up. If you can help, please do. Gråbergs...
Click to read more »he is very popular, but that doesn’t constitute most things. Remember WP:BFDI lvrlol / sv1ad talk 14:36, 25 March 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »Remsense诉 18:12, 7 April 2024 (UTC) alright, i'm coming across a beautiful WP:BFDI issue with an extension of the article for Serial Experiments Lain i've been...
Click to read more »August 2023 (UTC) I have been contributing to the essay Wikipedia:Why is BFDI not allowed on Wikipedia? and I honestly feel like I want to say this (This...
Click to read more »a strange character! Regular object shows like Battle for Dream Island (BFDI) or Inanimate Insanity (II) usually don't feature a puzzle piece character...
Click to read more »day :) –The Sophocrat (talk) 03:43, 25 May 2025 (UTC) On a related note, WP:BFDI. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 12:32, 27 May 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »American Communist Party (and its various drafts). For a bad example, see BFDI. PhoenixCaelestis (Talk · Contributions) 23:26, 15 October 2025 (UTC) If...
Click to read more »unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC) Wikipedia:Why is BFDI not allowed on Wikipedia? (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)...
Click to read more »page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC) Wikipedia talk:Why is BFDI not allowed on Wikipedia? (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)...
Click to read more »(UTC) A Makeover Story - (20697) - keep - closed 01:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC) BFDI (Franchise) - (3490) - speedy delete - closed 21:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC) Disorder...
Click to read more »happened fairly late in the article's history. See WP:BFDI#List of deletion nominations and WP:BFDI#List of publicly logged deletions if this is the first...
Click to read more »Cullen328. Favonian (talk) 05:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC) BFB : Battle For BFDI / BFB (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) I request to edit this...
Click to read more »article is also unsourced. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 10:18, 4 November 2025 (UTC) Bfdi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Reason: Vandalism Trade (talk)...
Click to read more »Exceptionally creepy edits. Cullen328 (talk) 06:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC) BFDI attracts a crowd that is exceptionally... well, I'll put it in less blunt...
Click to read more »grokipedia comments. signed, Rosguill talk 19:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC) The BFDI draft made me think this was a very young person, not an adult trolling....
Click to read more »needed] (she|they|xe) 23:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC) This is pretty much a WP:BFDI-ish problem. A user has attempted to game the system for what is basically...
Click to read more »accepted. Please do not modify it. Target of redirect: Wikipedia:Why is BFDI on Wikipedia? Reason: Alternatively people ask "how did it finally get an...
Click to read more »alternative name or related topic? No mention of a character named "Four" on the BFDI page. (Four (Battle for Dream Island)) ~ rusty meow ~ 04:36, 4 August 2026...
Click to read more »article without demonstrating evidence of notability. I recommend reading WP:BFDI (an essay) for the full context. Giovanni Potage (talk) 12:53, 28 July 2026...
Click to read more »information. If it isn't obvious from the title, the page is related to WP:BFDI, so disruption is a given. Protection should preferably last a few weeks...
Click to read more »redirect: Wikipedia:Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia? Reason: Named after the third season of BFDI. Follows the pattern of WP:BFDI, WP:BFB, and WP:TPOT. Source...
Click to read more »accepted. Please do not modify it. Target of redirect: Wikipedia:Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia? Reason: Cognate with WP:OSCWP:OSC (object show community)...
Click to read more »notability beyond a shadow of a doubt. This seems to be a situation similar to WP:BFDI or others in WP:DRPR - subject with massive niche popularity but a lack of...
Click to read more »involves changing the capitalization. The only difference between this and BFDI is that there may be reliable sources that mention SssniperWolf. The ultras...
Click to read more »(Initiated 711 days ago on 1 September 2024) Already posted at WP:AN, but need a closer type to come box some statements. Izno (talk) 07:22, 2 October...
Click to read more »