Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Help FAQs Article subjects Article subjects' FAQ Frequently asked questions (FAQs) Index of FAQs Main FAQ Overview Readers Schools Contributing Editing...
Click to read more »qualify for CSD G7? Train2104 (talk) 19:11, 2 August 2010 (UTC) Delete - WP:BFAQ#ACCOUNT. - LuckyLouie (talk) 22:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC) 'Delete Not much...
Click to read more »this WikiProject. If you are one of those persons, you are asked to read WP:BFAQ, which will help you to understand why this practice is an issue. In addition...
Click to read more »this WikiProject. If you are one of those persons you are asked to read WP:BFAQ which will help you to understand why this practice is an issue. In addition...
Click to read more »notable (not suitable subjects for encyclopedia articles). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. Edit other topics. See Wikipedia:Community portal if...
Click to read more »patrolling admin and checkuser comments Geronimo ahmo blocked as an obvious sock, and advised to read the WP:BFAQ. Amalthea 10:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »demonstrate notability (suitability for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:10, 16 May 2019 (UTC) Papi Paul Poeme (talk ·...
Click to read more »the short answer to your question about which parts is "all parts". See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for an explanation of why it's a bad idea for a company to try to...
Click to read more »important things; If you have a conflict of interest, be very careful. See WP:BFAQ, WP:BESTCOI. Everything should be verifiable, using inline references to...
Click to read more »notable (not suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. Wikipedia is not for advertising, promotion, or public...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's requirements; it was deleted for violating copyright. See also WP:BFAQ#COMPANY and your talk page. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »am posting this on their behalf. I will direct the site owner to read WP:BFAQ. Jehochman Talk 12:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Thank you, Jehochman! I've added...
Click to read more »guidelines for inclusion, and should not be the subject of an article. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY enlightening. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:52, 15 June 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »clear what guidelines those would be. The only guideline I can see is the WP:BFAQ#Company page that ICONICS (talk · contribs) referenced on Category talk:Automation...
Click to read more »you've provided, Wikipedia doesn't need a page about AUH Foundation. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:11, 27 July 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2010 (UTC) Unreferenced, promotional, username is against policy. See WP:BFAQ. Chzz ► 05:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC) 3PL Systems Inc. (3PL Systems)...
Click to read more »inspire confidence that the author is willing to work within the bounds of WP:BFAQ. COI aside, it doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG and is full of promotional language...
Click to read more »initially declined), so the draft may never be accepted. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:42, 10 October 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »gooma (talk) 07:51, 16 September 2015 (UTC) @Kabirnahak: You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY helpful. Worldbruce (talk) 07:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC) Samuel Blaison (talk ·...
Click to read more »articles. So there may be nothing you can do to get the draft accepted. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:19, 22 December 2018...
Click to read more »attention to your request. For more information about your options, see WP:BFAQ. Although written about businesses and other organizations, it broadly applies...
Click to read more »are not a suitable subject for an encyclopedia article. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:11, 31 August 2019 (UTC) Goodhew (talk ·...
Click to read more »(UTC) See WP:ADVERT and WP:CORP, Only has a primary source. Please, read WP:BFAQ. Chzz ► 06:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC) I have been working on this entry...
Click to read more »this weekend. - Dank (push to talk) 17:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC) How about WP:BFAQ#WHY WP:WHYNOT? It was a little sloppy, but I've tightened it up; it's more...
Click to read more »Stick to facts from independent reliable sources. Also, please read WP:BFAQ. Chzz ► 02:37, 7 October 2010 (UTC) I posted this article and it was deleted...
Click to read more »see WP:VRS. One reference is definitely not enough. Also, please read WP:BFAQ. Chzz ► 23:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC) This is a wiki for the non-profit organization...
Click to read more »articles, (and even long-running minor venues in a list article). Suggest WP:BFAQ#COMPANY if you think your own venue deserves an article. Chris Neville-Smith...
Click to read more »with respect to companies. Most businesses are not notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 20:58, 23 May 2019 (UTC) Ericawallace35 (talk ·...
Click to read more »of the company, it shouldn't have an article in Wikipedia. Most companies shouldn't. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »not adding material that volunteers would have to delete. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2019 (UTC) Ajg2345 (talk ·...
Click to read more »so isn't as simple as us telling you to reshape your vowel sounds. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for alternatives. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:56, 3 August 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »of interest is a supremely bad idea, and is strongly discouraged. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:26, 19 May 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »wait. Studying Wikipedia's guidelines and best writing may be helpful. WP:BFAQ#COMPANY also contains good advice. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:29, 27 November...
Click to read more »Corporation, BuroHappold Engineering, and Hochtief. Before proceeding, read WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. Most businesses do not, and should not, have Wikipedia articles...
Click to read more »encyclopedia). No amount of editing will make the draft acceptable. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:19, 6 May 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »is the subject, Levyx. Most businesses are not notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. You're welcome to write about something else, but if...
Click to read more »Taira-prime (talk) 22:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC) Hi Taira-prime. Please see WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC) Taira-prime Wikipedia...
Click to read more »inclusion in the encyclopedia). Most businesses are not notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. No amount of editing can fix the problem of notability...
Click to read more »not to try to write the article yourself, but to follow the guidance at WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:35, 25 April 2019 (UTC) Ayman2121 (talk ·...
Click to read more »source for you. It's a bad idea to write about a company you work for. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:23, 1 December 2021...
Click to read more »you shouldn't edit on the topic. What is the alternative? You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY useful. Gather sources that are independent of the company - nothing...
Click to read more »work without a signature. With regard to your question, you may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC) BorgFabian (talk ·...
Click to read more »but those things do not satisfy any of the notability criteria. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:01, 19 January 2019...
Click to read more »articles about them. If someone creates one, it should be deleted. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:46, 21 September 2018 (UTC) WikiBPAN (talk ·...
Click to read more »22:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC) The user-page was deleted as an advert. See WP:BFAQ. Chzz ► 20:24, 14 February 2011 (UTC) Volcom7205 (talk) 22:53, 10 February...
Click to read more »have been written about it in reliable independent sources. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:47, 29 July 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »let me know what the issue is? Thanks! Peter Hi Pyeargin. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. The draft was rejected because the topic is not notable...
Click to read more »article on Wikipedia (most organizations don't, and shouldn't). Please read WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. I recommend that you set the draft aside and concentrate on the...
Click to read more »However, you need to change your username, see WP:CORPNAME. And please read WP:BFAQ. Chzz ► 15:18, 9 August 2010 (UTC) Not sure how to write this article...
Click to read more »to write about a topic with which you have a conflict of interest. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:18, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Tatyana Malaysian (talk ·...
Click to read more »excluded as trivial coverage. Most businesses are not notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »coverage of the business, but I wouldn't hold your breath. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC) Longislandbrief...
Click to read more »notability guidelines for companies. Most business do not. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. Knockaround may have satisfied the guidelines as they...
Click to read more »Smehra2801 (talk) 06:52, 15 October 2019 (UTC) Smehra2801, Firstly read WP:BFAQ#COMPANY For a business to be notable in Wikipedia terms, it requires significant...
Click to read more »article, review this guide. Cheers! TN‑X-Man 14:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC) See WP:BFAQ. Why do you "need" to write about your employer on Wikipedia? Did you employer...
Click to read more »write an encyclopedia article about your company, I encourage you to read WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. What you're doing is a terrible idea, for so many reasons. To be...
Click to read more »empty handed. I encourage the creator to read the second paragraph at WP:BFAQ#WHY and explain to his/her client that without sources about the foundation...
Click to read more »It has no independent reliable sources, and is not neutral. See also WP:BFAQ. Chzz ► 10:53, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Fred, thanks for the prompt feedback...
Click to read more »are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:32, 19 September 2019 (UTC) Briannaburns123...
Click to read more »it's a horrible idea for you to write the article. Follow the advice in WP:BFAQ#COMPANY and let volunteers at Wikipedia:Requested articles write any article...
Click to read more »are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. The rejection of the draft is not based on the size...
Click to read more »time. PeterSymonds | talk 10:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Also see: WP:BFAQ#DELETE, WP:BFAQ#WHY, WP:EIW#Company, and WP:WWMPD. --Teratornis (talk) 15:26, 11...
Click to read more »Please see WP:NPOV. It needs independent, reliable sources. The WP:ONESOURCE is not enough. See also WP:BFAQ. Chzz ► 16:19, 23 October 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »for any form of publicity, promotion, or public relations. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:31, 30 December 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC) LoLo0732 (talk ·...
Click to read more »inclusion in Wikipedia). Most businesses are not notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. No amount of editing can fix the problem. There is no...
Click to read more »you have a conflict of interest, please be very careful, and read the WP:BFAQ. Best, Chzz ► 04:14, 8 August 2010 (UTC) An article about Dr. Paul A....
Click to read more »belong in the encyclopedia. Most businesses aren't notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#Company informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:38, 31 December 2019 (UTC) Vesta82601 (talk ·...
Click to read more »are not suitable subjects for stand alone encyclopedia articles. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. Wikipedia is forever a work in progress. It...
Click to read more »businesses are not notable and drafts about them will never be accepted. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. On the other hand, I'm sure you've learned...
Click to read more »anything you can do to make the draft acceptable to Wikipedia. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY helpful. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC) Skornflakes (talk ·...
Click to read more »an uphill battle meeting the encyclopaedia’s inclusion criteria. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:57, 16 March 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »understand that most companies are not suitable subjects for Wikipedia, see WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. You have been advised to study the guideline on conflict of interest...
Click to read more »demonstrate that the company is notable. You may find it helpful to read WP:BFAQ#COMPANY before you go any further. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:08, 22 February...
Click to read more »businesses are not suitable subjects for an encyclopedia article. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY helpful. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »shared by multiple individuals. With regard to the draft, you may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:42, 6 August 2019 (UTC) Peter...
Click to read more »--Orange Mike | Talk 15:37, 23 August 2018 (UTC) Hi Lucienne Lopez bkv. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. If multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources exist (think...
Click to read more »neutrally, never able to produce an encyclopedia article. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2019 (UTC) Bollinmoor (talk ·...
Click to read more »org/wiki/Draft:AwardWallet) published? Alexiveresch (talk) 22:13, 17 July 2019 (UTC) @Alexiveresch: See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:41, 18 July 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »may pain you, but whatever you do, don't edit the article directly. See WP:BFAQ#EDIT. If you try to sway consensus against this result by posting on Talk:Geely...
Click to read more »notable organization based on sources that are indisputably reliable? See WP:BFAQ for examples of issues to keep in mind for any article about an organization...
Click to read more »kitty because No third party references are stated in the article as per WP:BFAQ#DELETE, so this article can be deleted. Doesn't meet Wikipedia:Notability...
Click to read more »Australian Financial Review, The New Zealand Herald, and the like). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:48, 4 May 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »December 2017 (UTC) @Primacyeditor: Thank you for your disclosure. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for the best way to proceed. When describing the company for Wikipedia:Requested...
Click to read more »commissioner of a study. Most businesses are not notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:29, 9 November 2019 (UTC) MadShelton (talk ·...
Click to read more »there's no sign of that being just around the corner for EdCast. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Bloggersparadise (talk • contribs) 04:10, 30 January 2011 (UTC) See WP:BFAQ, particularly WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. —teb728 t c 05:03, 30 January 2011 (UTC) Also WP:SOAP...
Click to read more »being labelled as a single-purpose account. See e.g. WP:BACKLOG. See also WP:BFAQ for general guidance. Chzz ► 17:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC) Further to the...
Click to read more »business aren't notable (aren't suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »businesses are not suitable subjects for an encyclopedia article, see WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »interest, so we recommend against writing about that organization; see WP:BFAQ. Also, it is not neutral, and has no references to reliable sources. It is...
Click to read more »the mainspace. DrStrauss talk 13:42, 30 June 2017 (UTC) @Dmurray06: See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. Companies are strongly advised not to submit articles at all. It's...
Click to read more »about the company, only quotes someone who works there. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC) Timofeytv (talk ·...
Click to read more »which describes the business at significant length. You may wish to read WP:BFAQ and WP:CORP for more information. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:41, 28 November...
Click to read more »topic to have any realistic hope of writing about it objectively. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for recommended ways forward. --Worldbruce (talk) 20:25, 8 January...
Click to read more »baranwal (talk) 15:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC) Hi Manjeet.baranwal. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. Most businesses are not notable. The guidelines for...
Click to read more »they are "contributing significantly" to their industry. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 72.132...
Click to read more »Mulryan. Don't write about yourself, your family, friends, or company. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY and Wikipedia:Autobiography for further explanation of why. If you're...
Click to read more »your conflict of interest, we do not recommend writing the article; see WP:BFAQ. In addition, note that articles need independent reliable sources; see WP:FIRST...
Click to read more »to follow the advice in the WP:BFAQ page that you read, than to go by other stuff that exists. Pages like the WP:BFAQ represent the best thinking of highly...
Click to read more »wonder if you are involved with that company? If so, please carefully read WP:BFAQ and WP:BESTCOI. It needs better references Blogs are not "Reliable sources"...
Click to read more »are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »The essay WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS may help you understand why. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:17, 6 August 2019 (UTC) JIm DeNunzio (talk ·...
Click to read more »Electricsity. The company is not notable. Most businesses aren't, see WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. You're wasting your time trying to improve the draft, because no...
Click to read more »but at present the company is not notable. Most business aren't. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. Revisit the topic in a few years when it is...
Click to read more »Facebook or LinkedIn, and is not to be used to manage your own reputation. WP:BFAQ#COMPANY is written about organizations and companies, but applies equally...
Click to read more »knowledge of Wikipedia's rules "wins." Everyone involved should read WP:OWN, WP:BFAQ, WP:CITE, WP:CITET, WP:FOOT, and the Astroturfing article. If someone criticizes...
Click to read more »inclusion in the encyclopedia). Most businesses are not. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. Rejection is meant to be final, to convey that the topic...
Click to read more »businesses are not suitable subjects for an encyclopedia article. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. WP:SIGCOV is the general notability guideline. For what...
Click to read more »ISBN 978-0-7626-0585-9. That isn't nearly enough to justify an encyclopedia article. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:36, 25 June 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »regional media, and do they contain significant coverage of NBSO? See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for your best course of action. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:42, 5 February...
Click to read more »conflict of interest, will not be the right person to write about it. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:19, 3 June 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »notable, so Wikipedia should not have an article about it. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. The encyclopedia is not for any kind of advertising...
Click to read more »businesses and organizations should not have an article on Wikipedia, see WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. An encyclopedia article should not be a regurgitation of what they...
Click to read more »different reviewers, you don't appear to be prepared for the task. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for alternatives. Attention reviewers (Chetsford—AngusWOOF—Atlan...
Click to read more »extends to biographies of their living founders or executives. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. Wikipedia is forever a work in progress. It contains...
Click to read more »are already well-known. Also, be careful of conflict of interest; see WP:BFAQ. Chzz ► 03:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC) Hi, could you please do me a favor...
Click to read more »stand-alone article on Wikipedia (at this time). You might find the WP:BFAQ helpful, although it's written primarily for for-profit businesses. Also...
Click to read more »approach to this is based on Durova's, as taught to me by her splendid WP:BFAQ. Perhaps we should try doing a somewhat more specialized one, as this sort...
Click to read more »touch with me or someone, and we will explain the facts of life about WP:BFAQ and how to have reasonable articles in WP, instead of stuff like these which...
Click to read more »this WikiProject. If you are one of those persons, you are asked to read WP:BFAQ, which will help you to understand why this practice is an issue. In addition...
Click to read more »notable (not suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC) Shashwat SSJS 007 (talk ·...
Click to read more »PrimeHunter (talk) 00:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC) I am aware of the FAQ WP:BFAQ#ADVERT involving commercial advertisements and have been removing them from...
Click to read more »notable (not suitable subjects for stand alone encyclopedia articles). See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:27, 22 July 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »on behalf of any of your clients, please read WP:COI, WP:BESTCOI and WP:BFAQ.--ukexpat (talk) 16:39, 17 September 2012 (UTC) Athomedia est une agence...
Click to read more »company, it is not appropriate to add it to Wikipedia - please see WP:VRS, WP:BFAQ. Urban Dictionary, YouTube and other wikis are not a reliable source. You...
Click to read more »businesses are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:57, 8 July 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to organisations. --Fredrick day (talk) 22:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC) WP:BFAQ has advice that is just as relevant to non-profit organisations as businesses...
Click to read more »the entry for pyrrhic victory. But this seems to be a situation which WP:BFAQ doesn't seem to cover: we're more worried about companies unreasonably adding...
Click to read more »April 2008 (UTC) Wikipedia is not to be used for marketing. Please see WP:BFAQ. --Yamla (talk) 21:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC) Just as a general notice, the above...
Click to read more »WP:YFA and WP:CORP. – ukexpat (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC) And see WP:BFAQ and WP:PEACOCK. On Wikipedia we do not have "staff" in the usual corporate...
Click to read more »(Talk to me and find out what I've done) 13:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC) See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:50, 21 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned...
Click to read more »a thorough understanding of WP:COI guidelines and the WP:PAID policy. WP:BFAQ#COMPANY may be helpful. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:09, 23 January 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »businesses don't have Wikipedia articles about them and aren't suppose to. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:19, 22 March 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »but here's another take, since I've already typed it up. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY helpful. The best advice is not to author the draft yourself. Instead...
Click to read more »subject. The subject of Wikipedia articles must be notable. See WP:BUS and WP:BFAQ. —teb728 t c 00:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC) My sister gave me a group of old postcards...
Click to read more »possible. That being said, why don't we refer them to the process at Wikipedia:BFAQ#COMPANY? We'd also need assurances that they're not account sharing. justinfr...
Click to read more »Does not have independent reliable sources, see WP:FIRST, WP:GNG, WP:V, WP:BFAQ. Chzz ► 04:10, 29 June 2010 (UTC) Hello, my article was reviewed while...
Click to read more »September 2010 (UTC) Not until you have a nice sit-down with them explaining WP:BFAQ. Unless they understand having a COI and writing about something they are...
Click to read more »them to set up individual accounts, and referring them to WP:NOSHARE and WP:BFAQ#ACCOUNT for further clarification. However, both those documents state that...
Click to read more »necessarily get better over time. I strongly advise that you consider WP:BFAQ#COMPANY before continuing with the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:44, 26 July...
Click to read more »organization and uses the term "we" on its userpage, which is a violations of WP:BFAQ#ACCOUNT which states that It is against our local policy for two or more...
Click to read more »you meant that Draft:The feath3r theory is about your organization, see WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. Writing about yourself or your organization on Wikipedia is strongly...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC) Pages aren't preserved, see WP:BFAQ#PROTECT. Victor Schmidt (talk) 19:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC) What do you mean...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC) I added a section to the FAQ to address questions like this: WP:BFAQ#CORPWIKI. --Teratornis (talk) 21:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »added by Dwiltshi (talk • contribs) 02:48, 5 March 2009 (UTC) Also see WP:BFAQ, and note that general advice can be off the mark by varying degrees in specific...
Click to read more »are generated" - who says they're "high quality"? ...etc. See WP:NPOV, WP:BFAQ. Chzz ► 01:28, 27 May 2011 (UTC) Thank you very much - very helpful feedback...
Click to read more »quality of people’s lives all over the world are not appropriate. See also WP:BFAQ. Chzz ► 05:57, 8 October 2010 (UTC) Article about an extinct indigenous...
Click to read more »Wikipedia but none exists. What can I do? (WP:BFAQ#COMPANY) Thank you for reading the instructions in WP:BFAQ and attempting to do the right thing. On Wikipedia...
Click to read more »by 174.60.117.52 (talk) 19:45, 17 March 2011 (UTC) Please don't - see WP:BFAQ. If the websites are notable then someone else will write about them. Chzz ► ...
Click to read more »businesses are not appropriate subjects for an encyclopedia article. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. The draft cites two trade publications and...
Click to read more »kainaw wrote, you will need to read these pages: WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:V, and WP:BFAQ in addition to WP:COI. Also note the difference between policies and guidelines...
Click to read more »07:38, 24 January 2013 (UTC) (edit conflict) WP:COI, WP:PSCOI, WP:BPCOI, WP:BFAQ, WP:CORP, WP:AfC, WP:RA, WP:YFA. (Also, so you may properly get mad at my...
Click to read more »an organization.. --RyRy5 (talk) 02:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Please read WP:BFAQ too, and WP:WWMPD to see what often happens to new articles by new users...
Click to read more »10:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC) Tagged for deletion as an advert; please see WP:BFAQ and WP:FIRST. Chzz ► 14:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC) Is ICFAI University...
Click to read more »that Wikipedia can't be used the way you want it to be. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. Some specific problems with the draft include: The lede...
Click to read more »are not a suitable subject for an encyclopedia article. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »comment added by Kyouria (talk • contribs) 21:14, 5 May 2011 (UTC) See WP:BFAQ#CORPWIKI. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 21:30, 5 May 2011 (UTC) I was attempting...
Click to read more »news-focussed already. Martin Hogbin (talk) 09:25, 25 May 2013 (UTC) WP:BFAQ might be the most helpful page. The corporate publicity office (if any) probably...
Click to read more »with, please read WP:COI as well as relevant FAQs such as WP:ASFAQ and WP:BFAQ. I am trying to add a note in the Notes section of http://en.wikipedia...
Click to read more »companies that meet our requirements for notability (see WP:CORP). Also see WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 09:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC) is it leagle to chew tobacco...
Click to read more »promotional language. If you are affiliated with the subject, see WP:COI and WP:BFAQ. See WP:FOOT, WP:CITE, WP:CITET, WP:RS, and WP:V. The draft contains a number...
Click to read more »Biddulph (talk) 16:52, 31 August 2011 (UTC) And please also read WP:ORG and WP:BFAQ. – ukexpat (talk) 17:19, 31 August 2011 (UTC) Hi, I just tried to edit the...
Click to read more »- if you're editing about anything to do with a company, please read WP:BFAQ. As to why it won't save...I don't honestly know. But you're probably best...
Click to read more »sources for the things they wanted to write here about. See WP:COI and WP:BFAQ. There are many other wikis that do accept original work. See WikiIndex....
Click to read more »but it could be a promising article. Could you follow the directions at WP:BFAQ#COMPANY and find at least two independent reliable sources? Thanks, Goodvac...
Click to read more »It would be wise for you to read WP:COI, WP:BESTCOI, WP:ADVERT, and WP:BFAQ. - David Biddulph (talk) 13:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC) I understand that...
Click to read more »presence, Internet presence management, and Content management system. Also see WP:BFAQ and WP:PEACOCK. --Teratornis (talk) 05:56, 25 April 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:56, 24 June 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »comment added by 149.164.121.43 (talk) 15:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC) No. See WP:BFAQ#PROTECT —SpaceFlight89 15:19, 14 August 2009 (UTC) Further to SpaceFlight89...
Click to read more »you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:58, 9 September 2008 (UTC) Also read WP:BFAQ and WP:COI, in case you are associated with the subject you want to write...
Click to read more »about themselves, rather than just being part of a larger subject) and WP:BFAQ. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:38, 10 November 2011 (UTC) You miss my points. I...
Click to read more »speedily deleted, and you are editing it in your userspace now.) See WP:BFAQ, if you haven't already. To get your references in shape, see: WP:FOOT, WP:CITE...
Click to read more »18:00, 23 March 2011 (UTC) You should also take a look at WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ for guidance about writing articles about companies and the related notability...
Click to read more »sources to demonstrate notability. In the meantime, please read WP:COI, WP:BFAQ and WP:CORPNAME.--ukexpat (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2012 (UTC) Mentioned...
Click to read more »please re-introduce the material after reading: WP:COI, WP:SPAM and WP:BFAQ, if you are still satisfied that your additions are unbiased and that they...
Click to read more »about it will poison your interactions with other Wikipedians. Also see WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. The draft was rejected because it is unsuitable for Wikipedia, not...
Click to read more »quite a backlog.--SPhilbrickT 16:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC) Please read WP:BFAQ and let us know if you have any more questions not answered there. It covers...
Click to read more »correctly without reading our friendly manuals first. See WP:YFA and WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 20:47, 11 December 2009 (UTC) Perhaps you mean this...
Click to read more »rifair.com/) and therefore you have a conflict of interest. Please read WP:BFAQ and WP:BESTCOI.--ukexpat (talk) 15:22, 12 November 2012 (UTC) The article...
Click to read more »shortcuts and display them with the {{Shortcut}} template. See for example WP:BFAQ#CORPWIKI, which links to a particular business FAQ entry, and is easy to...
Click to read more »the corresponding big yellow box on your talk page. You may also find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY useful. Most likely there's nothing anyone can do to get the draft...
Click to read more »touch with me or someone, and we will explain the facts of life about WP:BFAQ and how to have reasonable articles in WP, instead of stuff like these which...
Click to read more »inspire confidence that the author is willing to work within the bounds of WP:BFAQ. COI aside, it doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG and is full of promotional language...
Click to read more »clear what guidelines those would be. The only guideline I can see is the WP:BFAQ#Company page that ICONICS (talk · contribs) referenced on Category talk:Automation...
Click to read more »creation. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:28, 25 May 2009 (UTC) Also see WP:NOT, WP:BFAQ, and WP:WWMPD. "Theatrical services" sounds like a specialized topic, and...
Click to read more »guidance. If you are connected with the company, please also read WP:COI, WP:BFAQ and WP:BESTCOI. Hope this helps.--ukexpat (talk) 14:30, 27 April 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »am posting this on their behalf. I will direct the site owner to read WP:BFAQ. Jehochman Talk 12:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Thank you, Jehochman! I've added...
Click to read more »and cannot be promotional. TNXMan 21:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC) And see WP:BFAQ and Wikipedia: The Missing Manual. --Teratornis (talk) 21:54, 11 March 2009...
Click to read more »page. Since you are associated with the company, please read WP:COI and WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 22:27, 23 November 2010 (UTC) Hi, On the bmw page of...
Click to read more »which is probably more directly relevant to your question. Also see WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 23:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC) (e/c) I'm afraid you can't...
Click to read more ».... Dendodge.TalkHelp 11:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC) Please read all of WP:BFAQ before starting an article about your company. --Teratornis (talk) 15:16...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Why was my article deleted? If you (Jheiv) are part of a business, see: WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 23:13, 19 May 2008 (UTC) The User is Forum shopping...
Click to read more »7 December 2010 (UTC) (edit conflict)Please read the following pages: WP:BFAQ, WP:CORP, WP:COI and WP:SPAM, before you try to create the article. If you...
Click to read more »or Facebook. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 21:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC) See WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 02:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC) The user has been indefinitely...
Click to read more »notable organization based on sources that are indisputably reliable? See WP:BFAQ for examples of issues to keep in mind for any article about an organization...
Click to read more »empty handed. I encourage the creator to read the second paragraph at WP:BFAQ#WHY and explain to his/her client that without sources about the foundation...
Click to read more »kitty because No third party references are stated in the article as per WP:BFAQ#DELETE, so this article can be deleted. Doesn't meet Wikipedia:Notability...
Click to read more »articles, (and even long-running minor venues in a list article). Suggest WP:BFAQ#COMPANY if you think your own venue deserves an article. Chris Neville-Smith...
Click to read more »with policy and guidelines. Please also take a look at WP:BESTCOI and WP:BFAQ. Thanks.--ukexpat (talk) 13:18, 9 October 2012 (UTC) Gustave Kahnt (1848–1923)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Before we get into that, please read WP:SPAM,WP:COI, WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ. You are strongly discouraged from writing articles about subjects where...
Click to read more »in its current form. Suggest that you spend some time reading WP:CORP, WP:BFAQ, WP:RS and WP:SPAM. – ukexpat (talk) 19:48, 6 December 2010 (UTC) Those articles...
Click to read more »draft and at the moment it is not ready to be moved. Please read WP:CORP, WP:BFAQ, WP:SPAM and WP:RS. – ukexpat (talk) 15:56, 21 September 2011 (UTC) Hello...
Click to read more »well here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC) And see WP:BFAQ, WP:COI, and WP:PEACOCK. Almost all companies need to advertise, but companies...
Click to read more »And see WP:OWN. --Teratornis (talk) 08:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC) And WP:BFAQ, Personal wiki, and Corporate wiki. --Teratornis (talk) 08:28, 10 November...
Click to read more »--AndrewHowse (talk) 19:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC) See WP:LAYOUT, WP:WIKIFY, WP:BFAQ, WP:PEACOCK, WP:FOOT, WP:CITE, and WP:YFA. It also helps to look at some...
Click to read more »reflect this. I suggest you choose a generic username and read WP:COI, WP:BFAQ before editing. --59.95.111.96 (talk) 17:34, 21 July 2009 (UTC) It's been...
Click to read more »WP:SPAM, WP:RS and WP:YFA. – ukexpat (talk) 19:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC) And WP:BFAQ. Note that writing new articles on Wikipedia and having them stick can be...
Click to read more »parties - be open and honest about your conflict of interest. Please read WP:BFAQ. Cheers, Chzz ► 06:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC) (edit conflict)x2 Hey Dan,...
Click to read more »was notable enough to have an article. Read that link, and WP:WEB and WP:BFAQ; then, if you think you can establish notability by showing significant coverage...
Click to read more »Wikipedia about the institute with which you are affiliated, see WP:COI and WP:BFAQ. You can also request that someone else write an article about your institute...
Click to read more »an article. TNXMan 20:57, 16 December 2010 (UTC) And see WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ. If the company is not notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia, you...
Click to read more »AlfadorTalk|@ 14:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC) See MediaWiki, Corporate wiki, WP:BFAQ#CORPWIKI, and b:Wiki Science/How to start a wiki. --Teratornis (talk) 19:49...
Click to read more »and WP:YFA. Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 18:46, 30 July 2008 (UTC) And see: WP:BFAQ and WP:LAYOUT. If you work for the company, see WP:COI and WP:PEACOCK. Writing...
Click to read more »scholarly articles, etc.). See: WP:V, WP:RS, WP:FOOT, WP:CITE, WP:CITET, and WP:BFAQ. (The last one explains how even nonprofit organizations can be considered...
Click to read more »personally connected in any way with the subject of the article. And see WP:BFAQ for general information about articles relating to business. See WP:EIW#Dispute...
Click to read more »reading all the other kajillion instruction pages we mentioned, also see WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 17:59, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Good afternoon, I like to...
Click to read more »articles, here are the steps I’ve taken so far: Read up on COI policy, WP:BFAQ, and other relevant guidelines. Created an identity and user page indicating...
Click to read more »additionally read WP:YFA, WP:LAYOUT, WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:CORP, WP:BFAQ, WP:CITE, and WP:FOOT. Those should be just about enough to get you started...
Click to read more »Moxy (talk) 19:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC) Also read WP:COI, WP:OWN, and WP:BFAQ. Your account shows only this edit. If you did not have extensive editing...
Click to read more »appropriate place for a draft article. Please take a look at WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ for help with the notability requirements for companies and similar organisations...
Click to read more »in reliable, independent secondary sources. Have a look at WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ, and check with Slakr (talk), the deleting admin, before you repost it. JohnCD...
Click to read more »by the helpers above, you should read WP:LAYOUT, WP:COI, WP:CORP, and WP:BFAQ, and take the WP:TUTORIAL. Reading the manuals is key to working productively...
Click to read more »to what Wikipedia is trying to be - a reliable encyclopedia. Also see WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 00:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC) Dear Sirs, When I create a...
Click to read more »with the subject of the Anglia Television article. If so, see WP:COI and WP:BFAQ. Note that Wikipedia articles do not consist merely of users' personal knowledge;...
Click to read more »coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. See WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ for more detail. JohnCD (talk) 18:20, 14 April 2011 (UTC) Clergy Sexual Abuse...
Click to read more »04:35, 15 August 2008 (UTC) Since you have a business interest, also see WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 16:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC) Where in the WP community...
Click to read more »you could fix the article, you can ask me on my talk page. Also read WP:BFAQ. Killiondude (talk) 22:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC) I've made substantial additions...
Click to read more »account AzMomDoc which would imply one individual user). Please read all of WP:BFAQ for general guidelines about writing an article on Wikipedia about any business...
Click to read more »are trying to write, you need to understand at least all this material: WP:BFAQ, WP:PEACOCK, WP:NPOV, WP:RS, WP:CITE, and WP:LAYOUT. For the editing basics...
Click to read more »otherwise who would pay for it? See also WP:COI, WP:PEACOCK, WP:ADVERT, and WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 19:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC) I sincerely thank you both...
Click to read more »the MediaWiki wiki. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 00:56, 29 May 2008 (UTC) And see WP:BFAQ#CORPWIKI. --Teratornis (talk) 03:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC) Working my way through...
Click to read more »to start from scratch. Tell him to read WP:COI, WP:BESTCOI, WP:PROMO, WP:BFAQ, WP:V, WP:N, WP:CORP, WP:YFA, WP:PEACOCK - it looks an intimidating reading...
Click to read more »you attempt to create an article about Edgo Energy, please read WP:COI, WP:BFAQ and WP:BESTCOI.--ukexpat (talk) 14:35, 4 December 2012 (UTC) Would like to...
Click to read more »rules than they do. In general you should read all the stern warnings in WP:BFAQ, and if you're really serious, read Wikipedia: The Missing Manual. Study...
Click to read more »conflict of interest, it is strongly advised against. Please see WP:COI and WP:BFAQ. If you have any more questions feel free to ask them here. Kind regards...
Click to read more »WP:LAYOUT for pointers. Since you seem to be writing about a corporation, see WP:BFAQ. Beware of the common mistake of not providing enough reliable sources that...
Click to read more »understanding the WP:MTAU, the page creator should learn the facts mentioned on WP:BFAQ. Thanks Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 17:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC) This is not exactly...
Click to read more »definition". (All of this is somehow reminding me of the last line in WP:BFAQ#DISCLOSURE, which advises would-be subjects of Wikipedia articles not to...
Click to read more »advice on your talk page in a day or two, but meanwhile read WP:YFA and WP:BFAQ and note particularly that you need to establish WP:Notability by showing...
Click to read more »a conflict of interest. Dismas|(talk) 18:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC) See WP:BFAQ. There is no monetary cost to editing on Wikipedia, but there can be other...
Click to read more »(UTC) @Carl Poxon: Hi Carl, and welcome to the teahouse. As suggested by WP:BFAQ, Wikipedia tries to prevent organizations from advertising material. However...
Click to read more »probably doesn't qualify for an article here. You probably need to read the WP:BFAQ and the WP:LUC (as well as all of WP:COI, especially the parts about being...
Click to read more »reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:CORP, WP:BFAQ, WP:42. You can probably do that for Booker, so I have userfied the article...
Click to read more »User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard. Think hard about notability, and read WP:N, WP:CORP, WP:BFAQ. If you think you can show notability, I will "userfy" the article for you...
Click to read more »links may well be removed no matter what your username is; see Wikipedia:BFAQ.) -- Soap Talk/Contributions 15:26, 3 February 2010 (UTC) Username Plaganegra (talk ·...
Click to read more »11 July 2007 (UTC) Because of this, there's now the new busness FAQ at WP:BFAQ. Might be helpful to direct people to this. Nathanww 01:30, 12 July 2007...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) I am Conservapedia Sysop User:RobSmith. Per Wikipedia:BFAQ#ATTACK, I believe my organization is under attack. Factual inaccuries. Notice...
Click to read more »promotional user-name. I gave the user a welcome note including a pointer to WP:BFAQ and a COI warning, and he has not edited since. I will check out the books...
Click to read more »editing on behalf of a corporation is frowned-upon on Wikipedia; see Wikipedia:BFAQ. -Jéské (v^_^v X of Swords) 04:49, 15 April 2008 (UTC) Done Kingturtle (talk)...
Click to read more »justifiable way: release it under GFDL--this is the general suggestion at WP:BFAQ and applies to everyone. Of course we will continue to link to individual...
Click to read more »understanding the WP:MTAU, the page creator should learn the facts mentioned on WP:BFAQ. Thanks Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 17:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC) This is not exactly...
Click to read more »this WikiProject. If you are one of those persons you are asked to read WP:BFAQ which will help you to understand why this practice is an issue. In addition...
Click to read more »semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is subject to WP:Sockpuppetry and WP:BFAQ#ADVERT + WP:Advertising. Page should be protected indefinitely until sockpuppetry...
Click to read more »have a question about this? In the meantime, please read WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:05, 9 August 2010 (UTC) Hi i am just starting...
Click to read more »about notable subjects, and in this case, those guidelines are at WP:ORG. WP:BFAQ should also be essential reading. – ukexpat (talk) 20:25, 8 August 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »18:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC) It is strongly advisable not to. See WP:COI, WP:BFAQ, WP:SPAM and WP:CORP.--ukexpat (talk) 18:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC) (edit conflict)If...
Click to read more »company, it is not appropriate to add it to Wikipedia - please see WP:VRS, WP:BFAQ. Urban Dictionary, YouTube and other wikis are not a reliable source. You...
Click to read more »definition". (All of this is somehow reminding me of the last line in WP:BFAQ#DISCLOSURE, which advises would-be subjects of Wikipedia articles not to...
Click to read more »creation/Full Support Healthcare, you need to read at least WP:CORP, WP:BFAQ, and WP:COPYVIO. - David Biddulph (talk) 04:21, 25 November 2011 (UTC) Hello...
Click to read more »should not be creating the article. Please read WP:COI, WP:BESTCOI and WP:BFAQ. At the moment the draft is far too promotional in tone and it will need...
Click to read more »detailed fair-use rationale. Additionally, you may want to read WP:COI and WP:BFAQ. It looks like you are directly involved with this magazine and that your...
Click to read more »comment added by 58.7.149.15 (talk) 08:19, 16 July 2008 (UTC) Please see WP:BFAQ. Please also note that this page is only for questions about images and media...
Click to read more »shortcuts to the Wikipedia:FAQ (so we can link to individual FAQs, such as WP:BFAQ#CORPWIKI). Some users already started, but we did not finish. See User talk:Manors#Task...
Click to read more »encyclopedia, not generate search engine rankings. The OP should read WP:BFAQ, WP:CORP and WP:COI. – ukexpat (talk) 13:12, 30 June 2011 (UTC) Answered...
Click to read more »Google search indicates that you have a conflict. Also take a look at WP:BFAQ, WP:CORP, WP:SPAM and WP:RS. – ukexpat (talk) 20:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Don't get fooled by the scammers" and link to the scam warning (or to the WP:BFAQ). A less-intrusive form would be to put a small note at the end of the Main...
Click to read more »WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:14, 16 July 2025 (UTC) As a historical note, the WP:BFAQ used to recommend that businesses that wanted a volunteer to write an article...
Click to read more »organization they wanted to have an article), then I'd encourage them to take WP:BFAQ#WHY to heart, especially the practical and helpful advice "to add to your...
Click to read more »