bans are listed at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions. Shortcut WP:BANEXWP:BANEX Unless stated otherwise, article, page, topic, or interaction bans do not...

therefore, it should be included in Banex rules as point 6. As of today (May 1, 2021), according to the current Banex rules, I didn't break any; the other...

exceptions and the ban exceptions give a basic definition of obvious vandalism. BANEX says "The key word is 'obvious', that is, cases in which no reasonable person...

members of the minority in question differently. Meso-level: Update WP:BANEX to allow userpage discussion of your identity/life experiences/editing experiences...

BLPN, supposedly as a contravention of his topic ban, even though under BANEX BLP violations would be exempt from that topic ban. The problem that underlies...

members of the minority in question differently. Meso-level: Update WP:BANEX to allow userpage discussion of your identity/life experiences/editing experiences...

they are paid editors? added 16 September 2020, archived 19 October 2020 BANEX exception for permissions requests? added 13 October 2020 , archived 8 November...

pointed out that there's already a discussion regarding BANEX at Wikipedia talk:Banning policy#RFC: BANEX exception for permissions requests. GorillaWarfare (talk)...

something sticks. I thought my nomination of MVBW's userpage falls under BANEX, because I found at least two BLPVIOs on it, as I explained in the AfD thread...

something sticks. I thought my nomination of MVBW's userpage falls under BANEX, because I found at least two BLPVIOs on it, as I explained in the AfD thread...

is exactly what happened here—an end run, attempting to cover it with BANEX. BANEX does not cover requesting sanctions against the editor from whom one...

are covered by WP:BANEX - not being concerned with the interaction ban at all, only in seeking sanctions against Hijiri. WP:BANEX is very clear on what...

read WP:BANEX. BMK (talk) 23:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC) I wasn't going to insert myself into this, but I would worry that a misreading of BANEX might lead...

of this page consisted of WP:RUSUKR content. This does not fall under WP:BANEX, because it is neither obvious vandalism nor an obvious BLP violation. Helpful...

NorthBySouthBaranof that was closed by HJ Mitchell with no action per WP:BANEX. The basis for the removal was WP:BLP because the link contained very problematic...

my understanding is that that is evidently covered in Banex point 2 (though the scope of BANEX is the second part of my question). Since the IBAN was...

December 2015 (UTC) I will point out that WP:BANEX should allow the banned editors to post here, per banex "asking for necessary clarifications about the...

terms of WP:BANEX. EllenCT (talk) 20:11, 7 July 2019 (UTC) My attempt to close this section so that I could proceed in light of WP:BANEX, which was only...

edits should be made to this discussion. No topic ban violation per WP:BANEX. Complaint also withdrawn by filer. --qedk (t 桜 c) 17:54, 20 October 2019...

exceptions listed at BANEX – I agree completely with OID, you are forbidden to discuss them. If you disagree, please cite the language in BANEX that permits you...

obviously not a clear violation. --Light show (talk) 02:52, 26 March 2018 (UTC) BANEX specifically says "obvious". The phrasing of the part of BLP that speaks...

salt into the wound, and clearly allows per WP:BANEX. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC) Um, WP:BANEX starts by saying "Unless stated otherwise.....

violation of policy per WP:BANEX. He first posted something, I wrongly considered it an IBAN violation, he pointed out his BANEX justification, I accepted...

Ks0stm's comment below. Doug Weller talk 10:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC) Oppose: WP:BANEX expressly prohibits engaging in dispute resolution unless it's to address...

bright line, and it was not an obvious BLP violation as required by WP:BANEX, and the text removed was substantially different than previous versions...

behavior, and that trying to convince them otherwise is not covered by WP:BANEX. I was not claiming that the other editor was responsible for my behavior;...

start or engage in such a discussion, even here, except as permitted by WP:BANEX. Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary...

banned from GC so if this is determined to fall under my ban, I think WP:BANEX may apply due to the level of socking disruption. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:19...

when he was unblocked based on his promise to familiarize himself with BANEX and now, he has been active for scarcely seven weeks, during which time...

I am making sense here. DrChrissy (talk) 21:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC) BANEX doesn't allow one to report someone for a topic ban violation if doing so...

(UTC) Okay, this might be better: Notwithstanding the provisions of WP:BANEX, ScottKazma is banned from editing in articlespace for six months (or one...

to do economics broadly construed with only the exceptions set out in WP:BANEX. While I am not an admin I would think that the topic ban would include...

would like the block removed; the actions in question fall squarely under BANEX. Topic-banned from WP:LQ, quotation marks and the MOS in general Please...

who might look at this case. I am not above saying I have misunderstood BANEX, though I currently hold this does not appear to fall under it from my understanding...

July 2015 (UTC) I'm not convinced this meets the "obvious" standard of WP:BANEX, but that's why we have WP:IAR. IP's edits are terrible, and I find it hard...

IBAN with me, being unblocked because they claimed they had misunderstood BANEX, and subsequently violating their IBAN several times during the period in...

argues otherwise. Claiming her breach was justified by WP:BANEX simply doesn't fly; BANEX requires that "If you are claiming an exemption, make sure...

action is needed. --Jojhnjoy (talk) 08:52, 6 October 2017 (UTC) See WP:BANEX, neither of those are 'obvious' vandalism. 'Constructive' is irrelevant...

each other in discussions"? That is how I read the section just above WP:BANEX.Legacypac (talk) 02:27, 10 September 2017 (UTC) Sorry Legacypac, Godsy seems...

Sir Joseph (talk) 02:22, 6 October 2019 (UTC) Sir Joseph, please see WP:BANEX. Someone mentioning your TBAN does not give you permission to violate it...

area. The Arbcom prohibition has a "normal restrictions" clause, i.e. WP:BANEX's "Engaging in legitimate and necessary dispute resolution" line. I, on behalf...

the appeal text, or the discussions. I was not sure it was covered by WP:BANEX, to even hint that it might exist. But now that it has been discovered by...

July 2019 (UTC) @Ybsone: I know a lot more about IBANs than you do. WP:BANEX is deliberately written in such a way as to require interpretation in light...

copying and pasting the specific, exact text you're citing at BANEX? I looked through BANEX for what User:GoldenRing called "standard exceptions" as well...

repeatedly made clear reference to me directly and indirectly. There are three BANEX exceptions: "asking an administrator to take action against a violation...

limited to XFD, deletion review, PROD, and CSDs that are not covered by WP:BANEX." and this isn't a deletion related discussion. As someone with no prior...

allowed to "revert in one way or another [Nyttend's] edits" and, per WP:BANEX, REDNOT was not listed as an exception. Can you show where, either in policy...

violation it reached the level of an obvious violation as required by WP:BANEX --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 20:43, 13 January 2021 (UTC) I reverted...

accept that. This dispute ended in an ANI discussion, in which I used WP:BANEX to make my first and only Wikipedia-space edit since the ban began. The...

entry in DSLOG. EdJohnston (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC) But the WP:BANEX exception applies when there was an "obvious violation of the policy about...

I don't see a reason to consider this a ban violation. Remember that WP:BANEX permits dispute resolution, not strictly appeals alone. Of course, this...

sanctions. The content of the edit doesn't matter, as it isn't covered under WP:BANEX. In fact, Mark's edit reverted back in material about a living person that...

violations of this ban will result in blocks, except where excepted by WP:BANEX. The topic ban may be appealed in 1 year. Any questions about whether an...

December 2015 (UTC) I will point out that WP:BANEX should allow the banned editors to post here, per banex "asking for necessary clarifications about the...

further demonstrate the harm of your edits provided they aren't covered by WP:BANEX. So if a page is covered under 1RR as an example, you could be sanctioned...

Chronicle (talk) 00:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC) I do not believe that WP:BANEX allows a topic banned editor to file an AN/I report about the subject they...

the strictest reading of WP:IBAN allows for dispute resolution. See WP:BANEX which says, "Unless stated otherwise, article, page, topic, or interaction...

BANEX applies in the circumstances. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Not really, no, let's keep clear about what the rules are. WP:BANEX...

really want to, I'm not going to oppose. Arguably it could fall under WP:BANEX if you have a real case but don't quote me on that. Note, I'm also not going...

06:11, 9 December 2014 (UTC) Since I am Topic Banned I am asking if WP:BANEX can be applied if someone else is doing the appealing for you. I am not...

If the material the user removed was unsourced that would fall under WP:BANEX and therefore would not be a topic ban violation (in case the topic ban...

topic ban does apply to user talk pages (with some exceptions listed at WP:BANEX), though I wish the rules were clearer. At WP:TBAN it says "all pages" but...

(Littleolive oil (talk) 15:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)) Strike. Ymblanter, read WP:BANEX. Only in the most exceptional cases do we ban people from participating...

very report - not being an instance of necessary dispute resolution per WP:BANEX - is probably a violation of DrChrissy's GMO topic ban. I invite other admins...

never initiated one with him) because it would be done and over with. WP:BANEX allows him to defend himself, so it's not as if he can't address them, and...

covered by "necessary dispute resolution", and is permitted explicitly by WP:BANEX. His comments about other editors' behavior are not discussing content edits...

the time was, and it continues to be today, that the ARC fell under WP:BANEX criteria 2. Also to the best of my knowledge, AAW/CS had a 1-way iBAN only...

by WP:BANEX perhaps it risks more confusion. But anyway, just think of an example where the change is clearly warranted and not covered by banex e.g. an...

to an enforcement request related to NBSB editing the GG page under WP:BANEX. According to WP:TBAN ban covers all pages (not only articles) broadly related...

post to User talk:SlimVirgin. If you are unclear about the scope of WP:BANEX, ask for assistance. EdJohnston (talk) 14:55, 21 December 2015 (UTC) The...

(which is allowed per BANEX, but still tendentious), and even redacted BLP violations from the GG talk page which is also allowed by BANEX, but shows you are...

about me in an Arbitration page in a manner that was not covered by WP:BANEX,[37] then was immediately unblocked when he claimed in an email to the blocking...

reverting eachother's edits (outside of the narrow exceptions allowed by WP:BANEX). I'll note as a purely procedural matter that this resolution was a little...

there is an exception to such topic bans for "obvious" BLP violations (WP:BANEX). As far as I know that exception applies to GG sanctions, too. The article...

Debresser within an interaction ban appeal falls within the scope of WP:BANEX ("appealing the ban" is a specific bullet point). But, you know, stay on...

TBAN". Another of them (the AE report) was initially a clear-cut case of BANEX as I was asking for clarification of my own TBAN, and an admin short-sightedly...

everything to do with cosmetic changes (see also my comment on R1). WP:BANEX will cover anything he needs to ask about (such as confirming in a BRFA...

intention to edit the FLG articles or appeal the ban. I am writing this per WP:BANEX, where it refers to another user's conduct. I would be happy if an admin...

August 2018 (UTC) No one should be sanctioned for reverting socks, but WP:BANEX is not currently clear about it. It only makes exceptions towards BLP violation...

notes for me, asking about the scope of the ban; they're well within the WP:BANEX situation, so I don't have any complains about their actions or words. While...

comments, but I would request that any discussion I have here be sanctioned by BANEX. Thank you. Sir Joseph (talk) 23:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC) The text of SJ's...

further. Thanks. Ypatch (talk) 05:52, 28 February 2022 (UTC) I have now read BANEX. To confirm, am I allowed to make a separate report here about someone else's...

2021 (UTC) (edit conflict) This appeal appears to merely be utilizing WP:BANEX to continue advocating for your POV more than anything else, as it discusses...

Bringing it here is a violation of your topic ban as it isn't covered in WP:BANEX, which he already linked you. If you bothered to follow that link, you would...

"inserting obscenities" qualifies as "vandalism" then that sentence in WP:BANEX needs redrafting for sure. Collect (talk) 12:13, 14 July 2014 (UTC) This...

ask the editor to self revert and if necessary report them. As always, WP:BANEX is exception especially for a clear cut BLP-violation although you shouldn't...

What a sad state of affairs! Cassiantotalk 10:42, 5 December 2014 (UTC) WP:BANEX allows "asking an administrator to take action against a violation of an...

keeping WP:BOOMERANG in mind of course. This sounds perfectly in line with WP:BANEX. That said, I obviously welcome others' thoughts on this. - jc37 14:44,...

at WP:ANI be a ban violation if an appeal here isn't? For topic bans, WP:BANEX makes an exception for ban appeals. The point of prohibiting new ANIs, 3Os...

other editors part, would be vandalism, correcting of which is within WP:BANEX. I have simply added it back: [47]. And like I said, I did not remove any...

given your COI and self imposed topic ban. (This one is an exception per WP:BANEX.) Tutelary (talk) 22:59, 26 November 2014 (UTC) I'm not aware that individual...

still interacting with MaxBrowne. Chillum 17:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC) Per WP:BANEX you are allowed to participate on dispute resolution, which this is.KonveyorBelt...

reply. The iban specifically says it is subject to the usual exceptions WP:BANEX, which of course includes appealing a ban. If someone is trying to appeal...

for typo fixes or bots would be hard to administer, and would widen WP:BANEX beyond even its current complexity. Fourth, being a SPA is not an offence...

topic. Unless you are making an appeal or asking for clarification per WP:BANEX, you are not allowed to mention, discuss or otherwise do any editing related...

edits at issue violate the topic ban. They are not exempt from it per WP:BANEX. That provision only excepts "reverting obvious vandalism". In this case...

mainspace and in projectspace (subject to the exceptions explained in WP:BANEX). If a new report is filed here at WP:AN, the filing should be done by an...

before this complaint was filed. Now the AE block... [62] I thought that WP:BANEX meant I was allowed to talk to the enforcing admin about these things, but...

to comment here? HiLo48 (talk) 07:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC) I think WP:BANEX says yes, and Pete already has. Drmies (talk) 18:24, 3 February 2014 (UTC)...

it does seem that is what you are doing on Gamaliel's talk page. See WP:BANEX for a list of exceptions.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 03:28, 23 September...

multiple direct violations of Sashi's interaction ban easily crossing WP:BANEX into just hounding Tryptofish at this AE instead now trying to directly...

November 2020 (UTC) And there is no policy basis for such an exception (WP:BANEX is specific for a reason), nor was one intended in the remedy, nor do we...

interacting with each other. All five are topic-banned from "winningest". Per WP:BANEX, they're allowed to report ban violations, but uncivil or personal-attack-laden...

(talk) 16:53, 29 June 2017 (UTC) Yes thank-you. Following WP:IBAN and WP:BANEX is cleaner and clearer, though I appreciate the thought that you put into...

to say it looks like his revert at the Scarborough article falls within BANEX, which he'd then march down here to start the whole appeal process over...

to all three editors, as stated. Please see in particular WP:IBAN and WP:BANEX. Option 2: Has consensus (noting that indefinite is not interminable - especially...

into it and decide whether there has been a violation to be covered under BANEX. Put in other words, messages about the other user on the user talk pages...

rejected was because I supposedly violated the topic ban by relying on BANEX. So you're partly right, in that I "essentially did nothing wrong." --Light...

Either because it's not under the purview of such a topic ban, or under WP:BANEX since changing text saying he is fluent into the Telegraph said he is fluent...

(including at AN/I and AE) is one of the usual exceptions to topic bans (see WP:BANEX) so I don't think you have anything to worry about in that regard. Thryduulf...

editors. They're free to discuss their own ban in appropriate forums per WP:BANEX, but discussing other editors in the topic in this fashion is another violation...

understands what an interaction ban entails, please review WP:IBAN and WP:BANEX. Thanks! --Guy Macon (talk) 23:19, 16 September 2014 (UTC) Comments I am...

to do with Steeletrap’s topicban and more to do with BLPPRIMARY and WP:BANEX. The third diff has nothing to do with the tban. Sanctions here should not...

topic ban from project-space but reporting ongoing vandalism is an obvious BANEX case, and talk pages are also a thing. If they acknowledge they understand...

(yet again), and I think you know that I'd have legitimate reasoning—WP:BANEX says that vandalism exceptions apply to "obvious" cases, continuing: "The...

Jed's actions in this this thread are almost certainly not covered under BANEX. The most recent comment is a blatant attempt to justify the behaviour that...

Hijiri. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 02:12, 1 May 2015 (UTC) User:John Carter, see WP:BANEX; interaction bans don't prohibit banned editors from addressing the ban...

22:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC) MF did not violate the IBAN - he followed WP:BANEX. Also why would we want someone who plays so poorly with others at AfC dealing...

interacting with each other, subject to the usual exceptions as stated in WP:BANEX. This ban is only appealable to the community after a period of one year...

PackMecEng (talk) 20:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC) @PackMecEng: True, although BANEX is which would seem to cover this as well - but you're right the part should...

participating in dispute resolution in which you are a party is permitted by WP:BANEX it would in practice be no different to the above. Thryduulf (talk) 20:49...

pursue this. So now you know what you have to do. You must abide by WP:BANEX. Changing the subject again isn't appropriate. Grayfell (talk) 05:28, 6...

legitimate concern about the ban itself in an appropriate forum", to quote WP:BANEX. I welcome input from Dennis Brown or Drmies (or anyone else, for that matter)...

issues since that time were related to somehow violating the ban, ie. via Banex. --Light show (talk) 22:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC) You're seriously claiming...

2015, at 00:00 UTC. Per the general exceptions to limited bans found at WP:BANEX, you may discuss this banned topic in the context of appealing the ban or...

violation by someone else does not allow you to violate your iban. I think WP:BANEX is clear enough on this. Nil Einne (talk) 12:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)...

limited to XFD, deletion review, PROD, and CSDs that are not covered by WP:BANEX. Two important caveats. This does prohibit Lightburst from notifying ARS...

--ARoseWolf 15:36, 9 May 2022 (UTC) I would assume the policies set out in WP:BANEX would apply. So, for example, blatant and obvious vandalism on their user...

could see the case being made. But that's not the case here. Moreover, WP:BANEX applies to BLP violations (right?) and though I'm not sure this was a huge...

keep to the terms of the iban). Basically as described in WP:IBAN and WP:BANEX. MaxBrowne (talk) 12:06, 17 April 2014 (UTC)". IHTS (talk) 10:21, 18 September...

voluntary restriction to get a consensus before reverting (except for WP:BANEX). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:59, 17 May 2015 (UTC) I'm open to...

12:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC) Oppose - the proper policy regarding this is WP:BANEX, which allows reversions in cases in which no reasonable person could disagree...

WP:BANREVERT nor at WP:BE nor at WP:CSD nor at WP:Notability nor even at WP:BANEX, but all of these policies and guidelines have special rules for BLPs. On...

the substance, I think that the first diff[1] is still covered by the WP:BANEX exemption, as a discussion (albeit rather lengthy) of the topic ban itself...

wrong-doing but should be interpreted as a sign of respect to community input. WP:BANEX --Asterixf2 (talk) 14:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC) This is not the statement...

such at the one at issue here are neither excepted from topic bans by WP:BANEX nor by any other policy. The point of the topic ban (and the preceding ArbCom...

controversial primarily due to the conflict in the Ukraine. Given that WP:BANEX emphasises that vandalism must be obvious and the example given is blatant...

continuing harassment targeting myself in particular is clearly subject to WP:BANEX, as an issue directly involving myself. Furthermore, it's interesting how...

arbitration case but express no view on any further sanctions, other than that BANEX is sometimes misunderstood to mean that posting at ArbCom is always exempt...

dispute resolution, that is, to respond to this enforcement request (WP:BANEX). I therefore recommend blocking Lecen for a week. As to the substance of...

date is in order. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:36, 15 May 2014 (UTC) Per WP:BANEX, if a person is under a topic ban they should not be commenting on complaints...

seriously harmful nature that their removal must have been justified under WP:BANEX. I don't know, nor really want to know, if those IP edits were attacks against...

(UTC) If editor A and Editor B are interaction banned with each other. Per BANEX, Can editor A bring complaints about editor B that are not about the interaction...

lifted, topic ban, even though this matter obviously isn't IBAN-exempt under BANEX rules. Also concerningly, he says "pinging Nishidani (talk · contribs) to...

enforcement should they believe a violation of the ban has occurred (WP:BANEX). However, submitting a report that is so obviously vexatious, so obviously...

started by Bus stop about other users/incidents, or anything covered by WP:BANEX). ~Awilley (talk) 14:47, 5 September 2019 (UTC) The following discussion...

not the type of blatant and absolutely obvious vandalism covered by WP:BANEX. It therefore violated the topic ban. The second was about an area of Poland...

exceptions for anything, and there's no way those edits fall within WP:BANEX. GoldenRing (talk) 10:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC) Further topic-ban vios: 1 2 3...

exclude if I had not explicitly mentioned them in my sanctions. Per WP:BANEX, in the context of bans, only "obvious" BLP policy violations are exempt...

of it. He hasn't even made an attempt to claim that they are covered by BANEX, and anyway they are not. As I proposed an IBAN we might eek out a small...

10 November 2014 Another comment on a noticeboard. Tarc tries to use WP:BANEX as an excuse to violate the remedy, but deliberately omits the next line...

normally issue on-wiki sanctions over this use of email. @Captain Occam: WP:BANEX allows you to make statements here that would normally be tban violations...

--Guerillero | Parlez Moi 18:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC) Bus stop, the intent of WP:BANEX is to allow you to appeal the topic ban, and not to enable you to use this...

sections above. These look pretty obvious topic ban violations to me; WP:BANEX allows only the most obvious BLP violations as exceptions, those "in which...

nor I have a problem with the filing. I do want to caution Sdmarathe that BANEX allows them to respond to this filing, but any attempt to re-open their...

provoked here, the edit itself is a t-ban violation and is not covered by WP:BANEX. Nsk92 (talk) 19:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC) Why whould he blocked for starting...

enforced here. These are not the contexts in which restrictions like this are usually applied (cf. WP:BANEX). Sandstein 07:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)...

BLP). As to Vladimir.copic's evidence, I see them as: 2 allowed under WP:BANEX for removing BLPvio: Cohen (full multi-party edit war); Mason 2 marginal:...

Your edit summaries do not suggest that the edits were made with a view to BANEX and there is no general exemption for suspected socks. It has to be a banned...

stretch - a violation of the Donald Trump topic ban (commenting on DT per BANEX here). The admin placing the restriction explicitly stated that edits about...

concerns a dispute that bears on US politics. It is not covered by the WP:BANEX exception because this is not an appeal or request for clarification of...

addresses "governmental regulation of firearm ownership"), or that if it did WP:BANEX would apply as the content removed was both a copyvio [23] and a BLP violation...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) Seeing the ongoing AE thread, I think it is...

(talk) 15:59, 10 October 2020 (UTC) Wikipedia talk:Banning policy § RFC: BANEX exception for permissions requests Lev!vich 22:49, 12 October 2020 (UTC)...

20 January 2019 (UTC) @ GorillaWarfare: Thank you for pointing out WP:BANEX—I wasn’t familiar with that policy. -Ferahgo the Assassin (talk) 22:58,...

User talk:SlimVirgin is not covered by the ban exemptions listed in WP:BANEX. Per an AE discussion. EdJohnston (talk) 15:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC) Vergilden (talk ·...

here in response to an IBAN appeal, is almost certainly not covered under BANEX.) I have trouble talking about hounding/IBANs in general without running...

agree with Salvio. NativeForeigner Talk 23:07, 3 July 2014 (UTC) Per WP:BANEX, reverting obvious vandalism is already an exception to a topic ban; that...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) IBANs, like other sanctions, should be designed...

that's not how judicial processes normally work. The WP:BMB even violates WP:BANEX, Because most administrators do not like the WP:ADMINACCT]]--Persian-iran...

entire "unless" condition. Only the usual exceptions to bans in general (WP:BANEX) apply. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC) I think the first...

something that specifically mentioned him. If that's not in the letter of BANEX, it certainly is in the spirit of it. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:37, 16...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) "What is your stance on two-way IBANs that...

policy on this? --Guy Macon (talk) 00:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC) Per WP:BANEX, if they're earnestly asking for clarification or appeal, then it's OK....

of the areas that we sometimes historically except restrictions, per WP:BANEX, I'd like to push that way as a general principle. Finally, there is the...

exception to that criteria. Tutelary (talk) 02:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC) WP:BANEX notes the following as a "normal exception" to a ban such as that which...

interaction ban is in place to prevent. I would suggest that the spirit of WP:BANEX does not allow editors appealing an interaction ban to throw around accusations...

Awilley thanks for your input and note to me earlier. Somewhat like WP:BANEX, I had expected that I was able to note the multiple shortcomings of admins'...

your latest question, read Wikipedia:Banning policy, particularly the WP:BANEX section. The first bullet point there makes it clear that you are allowed...

this subject seems to be in violation of that ban and isn't covered by WP:BANEX even here. I had to deal with another editor doing this at ARC about a week...

pages, though caution should be exercised in enforcing restrictions when WP:BANEX is arguable, in accordance with our procedures ("This procedure does not...

can't figure out why you think my February post to Thryduulf violates WP:BANEX is because you don't. 2) You consider asking about how topic bans work,...

Jytdog's GMO topic ban, David is violating their own GMO topic ban (not a WP:BANEX instance). Such dancing around restrictions (i.e., clear meaning while not...

Comments: @GorillaWarfare: would you accept an amendment that mentions WP:BANEX to resolve Courcelles's concerns (which I agree are legitimate)? LFaraone...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) Seeing the ongoing AE thread, I think it is...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) A two-way iban is not an appropriate response...

(UTC) If editor A and Editor B are interaction banned with each other. Per BANEX, Can editor A bring complaints about editor B that are not about the interaction...

accused the opportunity to defend themselves. The only issue is that WP:BANEX says that defending oneself in either a clarification or appeal setting...

Springee that they were correct that they could not engage. Not exactly a BANEX situation. I'm in agreement that I'd like to see, as HB has said, a sample...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) There are no perfect solutions. I don't agree...

portals, broadly construed; edits falling under the usual exceptions(WP:BANEX) and answers to questions about these edits that are directly addressed...

like WP:BLPTALK (severe BLP vios shouldn't be posted in any namespace), WP:BANEX (the vios can be removed even by topic banned editors), and the reverting...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) As I wrote above I'm not a fan of IBANs in...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) I had a long tangent about IBANs in my above...

the topic ban. (I cannot see a way in which it meets the allowances in WP:BANEX.) I'm somewhere between closing this without further review and blocking...

that three of the proposed parties are already TBANned. My reading of WP:BANEX #2 would include this process, but to avoid any doubt, I have included an...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) I know that you are talking at least partially...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) IBANs, like other sanctions, should be designed...

deny editors the opportunity to defend themselves in practice, because WP:BANEX says that Engaging in legitimate and necessary dispute resolution is an...

party in administrators' noticeboard discussion that was not covered under BANEX[116][117] and possibly colluding off-wiki with third parties to violate...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) "What is your stance on two-way IBANs that...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) That really depends on the situation. I've...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) I'm not a fan of two-way IBANs for one-way...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) I am not a fan of one way interaction bans...

violations of this ban will result in blocks, except where excepted by WP:BANEX. The topic ban may be appealed in 1 year. Any questions about whether an...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) I am not a fan of one way interaction bans...

today. And, i came across one thats not listed. Guaifenex, also known as: Banex,Duratex,Phenylfenesin i have a link to a Description on Drugs.com http://www...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) I know that you are talking at least partially...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) A two-way iban is not an appropriate response...

manner, I just went to WP:BAN and decided that I should have gone to WP:BANEX, so I have to retype the name instead of adding two letters. Alternately...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) There are no perfect solutions. I don't agree...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) As I wrote above I'm not a fan of IBANs in...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) That really depends on the situation. I've...

interacting with each other, subject to the usual exceptions as stated in WP:BANEX. This ban is only appealable to the community after a period of one year...

accused the opportunity to defend themselves. The only issue is that WP:BANEX says that defending oneself in either a clarification or appeal setting...

associated pages (including talk pages), subject to the normal exceptions of WP:BANEX. This may be appealed after 6 months to any administrator (if declined,...

explain the context, would you be open to repealing it? (I am assuming that BANEX applies to these questions.) I'm not a fan of two-way IBANs for one-way...

that three of the proposed parties are already TBANned. My reading of WP:BANEX #2 would include this process, but to avoid any doubt, I have included an...

police say that 21 people have been killed in an explosion at a crowded Banex Plaza shopping center in Abuja's Wuse 2 district. (Voice of America) Business...

deny editors the opportunity to defend themselves in practice, because WP:BANEX says that Engaging in legitimate and necessary dispute resolution is an...

certain protected actions (we might think of those as analogous to our WP:BANEX, like reverting obvious vandalism). It's reasonable in that it doesn't provide...

violation [88] NE Ent 19:57, 30 November 2014 (UTC) This qualifies under WP:BANEX, clarifying the topic ban itself and in essence, appealing it. Additionally...

violence. That is a BLP violation, please delete. This comment exercises my WP:BANEX rights and I do not intend to violate any sanctions by posting here. wumbolo...

this rather unfortunate clarification that seems to be at odds with WP:BANEX I'm a bit concerned that Springee is going to end up essentially handcuffed...

enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. Support: with WP:BANEX (allowing to participate in discussions about themselves) in mind. The examples...

made to this discussion. Can I ask for clarification about the Wikipedia:BANEX policy for potenial spam? Example re: User:Joelphotofix (owner of Photofix)...

of the policy on biographies of living persons". To be especially clear, BANEX permits reverting obvious vandalism; I would also permit blocking over obvious...

I saw that meatpuppets you'd banned in ARBTRANS returned, I asked under BANEX about if/how/where to report it because I was under the impression I was...

TLDR WP:BANEX @ScottishFinnishRadish: Not sure why there is overextension of ARBECR at ARCA, especially when my original concern was ARBECR overpolicing...

an extremely constructive edit to an article that is not covered by WP:BANEX we still treat this as a topic ban violation, although it's something much...

TheTranarchist to participate in this review notwithstanding their topic ban, per WP:BANEX. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:35, 6 May 2023 (UTC) The article is almost entirely...

come here was wise, as I don't think it meets the letter of the law at WP:BANEX, but I think it probably meets the spirit. I'd have no concerns. I assume...

ways, including edit requests. The only exceptions are those listed at WP:BANEX. Thryduulf (talk) 14:31, 11 March 2026 (UTC) I knew I should ask before...

more genocidal (a term I don't use lightly) is in no way covered by WP:BANEX, and it clearly falls within Gender-related disputes or controversies, broadly...

ancient i.e. historic Turkic or Iranian people in Asia. Also unless WP:BANEX applies, then edits in violation of a topic ban are inherently disruptive...

(UTC) The TA is right. I suggest you reread WP:IBAN especially the part WP:BANEX. While "e.g." is used, so technically there can be "legitimate and necessary...

Kalbajar District#Return to Azerbaijan) on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. WP:BANEX therefore clearly doesn't cut it. - LouisAragon (talk) 23:46, 3 April 2023...

permitted and would not have done it intentionally. It is my assumption that wp:banex allows me to reply to this immediate escalation. I will look into this further...

inadvertently pinged one time in a discussion clearly falling within WP:BANEX, I think it's reasonable to make this a two-way IBAN. As for your earlier...

Objections? Hesselp (talk) 18:19, 2 February 2025 (UTC) According to WP:BANEX, addressing a legitimate concern about the ban itself in an appropriate...

away from that topic anywhere on Wikipedia, with exceptions stated on WP:BANEX. After this answer to me, I admitted my mistake, but why is he writing to...

If you don't feel you can do that within the limitations described at WP:BANEX, feel free to email ArbComm and note that you have done so. But it should...

on-wiki assessment of Glaukopis as a good source from 2012 to 2022. (nb: WP:BANEX). This strikes me as the same "guilt by alleged association" ArbCom saw...

it here. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:07, 9 September 2025 (UTC) WP:BANEX permits banned users to engage in dispute resolution at appropriate noticeboards...

ban or otherwise discussing it as part of a ban appeal is allowed per WP:BANEX. signed, Rosguill talk 22:27, 10 February 2026 (UTC) I am not appealing...

comment on their behavior at my case (which I consider hounding) under WP:BANEX, and was also told no. I only bring this up because I believe Springee's...

TurboSuperA+[talk] 18:00, 30 May 2026 (UTC) I don't know your circumstances, but WP:BANEX is the policy about TBAN exceptions, complete with qualifications and footnotes...

I suggest picking one of the first two options. I'll also note that WP:BANEX is not an absolute entitlement to complain about someone you're IBANned...

it whatever they are citing. Maybe also to Foundations of Chemistry. WP:BANEX would apply of course. While I'm a strong believer that COI doesn't forbid...

PositivelyUncertain (talk) 02:06, 18 July 2026 (UTC) My reading of WP:BANEX is that it may allow Springree to defend themselves here. Although if I...

doesn't include them posting edit suggestions beyond those covered by WP:BANEX. They're free to start their own blog somewhere outside the English wikipedia...

CTOP they intend to edit in, I'd expect it to be equally poorly received. BANEX covers the limited exception of discussing a topic for the purpose of appealing...

just "mostly", the only reason to leave it unprotected would be for WP:BANEX which I'm not sure even applies to ARBECR, or to reduce work for admins...

participation in the ARCA / any resulting case. (Arguably already falls under WP:BANEX #2, but good to be clear.) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 13:38...

and not just the letter. The exceptions to the ban are explained at WP:BANEX. I am not minded to ease this to a logged warning (though please note, an...

decides to block me, ignoring the fact that if that were the case then WP:BANEX should apply.[410] 18:38, 3 August 2021 Ymblanter (admin) tries to block...