Redirect to:
that became global hits on multiple occasions. Shortcut WP:BADCHARTSWP:BADCHARTS Amazon: Charts pertaining to only one specific retailer should not be...
Click to read more »information, and especially not a WP:BADCHART archive. Stifle (talk) 16:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC) Delete, per WP:BADCHARTS and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United...
Click to read more »another article based on the United World Chart, a chart listed on WP:BADCHARTS. By the creator of Best selling albums in 2009, which is going down in...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC) Tagged as CSD G4 repost Obviously a WP:BADCHART with very little authority in Brazil. Nate • (chatter) 21:46, 31 May 2009...
Click to read more »cited to support them isn't actually Billboard -- it's an unreliable WP:BADCHART provider called Alphacharts, which is not accepted as a notability-conferring...
Click to read more »Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts, a consensus was reached that the chart is a WP:BADCHART due to a dubious chart methodology which does not pass both logic and validity...
Click to read more »until 1988), and has been specifically discouraged as a source per WP:BADCHART. No real sources or discussion of where the numbers came from at all. Nate...
Click to read more »whether it just uses its own random process to compile a self-created BADCHART -- and so there can be no automatic presumption of notability, just because...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per WP:BADCHARTS - RD (Talk) 17:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC) Strong delete Chile doesn't have an official chart. WP:BADCHARTS says it all. Ten...
Click to read more »notability claims here are charting #102 on Canada's campus radio charts (a WP:BADCHART that cannot establish musical notability, as it isn't IFPI-certified),...
Click to read more »review could carry GNG. But earshot has since been deprecated as a WP:BADCHART because it's not IFPI-certified, one album review in one publication isn't...
Click to read more »support it. The strongest notability claim here is charting on Spotify, a BADCHART that cannot count toward passing the charting criterion at all -- and apart...
Click to read more »press releases distributed by newswire service Relaxnews. Possible WP:BADCHART candidate. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 04:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »tree. This is based on the United World Chart, which is listed at WP:BADCHARTS and was deleted per WP:Articles for deletion/United World Chart. An article...
Click to read more »tied to campus radio, meaning !earshot, meaning non-IFPI-certified WP:BADCHART — and nothing else here, neither in the substance nor in the sourcing,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts, the Rolling Stone chart has been deemed a WP:BADCHART due to faulty methodology. Since that chart has been deemed unreliable...
Click to read more »topping a genre chart in !earshot, but earshot is a non-IFPI-certified WP:BADCHART that does not count toward NMUSIC's charting criterion. The only other...
Click to read more »musician is a song that charted on Beatport, but that's a single-vendor WP:BADCHART that does not pass NMUSIC #2 (which requires national charts on the order...
Click to read more »charting but checking what U.S. is linked to we can see it is reverbnation, a badchart. A bunch of links have been dumped into the page but none good, shops,...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable chart without any known methodology, fails WP:BADCHARTS. Should be deleted and pinging Kww who has a better knowledge. —Indian:BIO...
Click to read more »(note that Radio Disney is not a valid chart per WP:Record charts and WP:BADCHARTS). "Sources" are one PR interview on MTV, one passing mention in a tour...
Click to read more »appear on any major music charts". Charts shown are those listed on WP:BADCHARTS. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 18:08, 1 May 2011 (UTC) That may...
Click to read more »charting claim doesn't pass NMUSIC #2, as it rests on an uncertified WP:BADCHART (Mediabase) rather than Canada's real notability-making pop charts (Billboard)...
Click to read more »notable on its own. JJL (talk) 00:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC) Delete The WP:BADCHARTS list shows that charts formed by viewer feedback via texts and phone calls...
Click to read more »chart included (which would be the saving grace) is disallowed per WP:BADCHARTS. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 14:58, 30 September 2012 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NMUSIC...
Click to read more »track listing or a reddit. fails WP:GNG. Beatport is considered as a WP:BADCHARTS and should not be used ofr notability purposes. Domdeparis (talk) 15:03...
Click to read more »only chart they are on is one that is listed on WP:BADCHARTS. I'm not certain that the WP:BADCHARTS listing is justifiable, but I do know that no one has...
Click to read more »sources rather than genuinely reliable ones. iTunes is a single-vendor WP:BADCHART, not a record chart that confers notability under NMUSIC #2, so topping...
Click to read more »non-primary, reliable or notable sources listed. Only notability is one non-WP:BADCHART. Potential WP:AUTO. Lazz_R 20:40, 12 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »UK's Official Charts Company, and not on the basis of just any randoid WP:BADCHART you can find — which means nothing stated here passes WP:NMUSIC, and the...
Click to read more »could verify the chart placement, it's actually a non-IFPI-certified WP:BADCHART that doesn't count toward getting an album or an artist over NMUSIC's charting...
Click to read more »of the charts at the Russian Wikipedia satisfy chart requirements (WP:BADCHARTS discourages Apple Music and Spotify charts, because they are not record...
Click to read more »for deletion/MYX Hit Chart. The MYX chart has since been listed at WP:BADCHARTS, and it obviously violates WP:SINGLENETWORK. —Kww(talk) 22:36, 4 November...
Click to read more »discussions. North America1000 10:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC) Delete It's a WP:BADCHARTS and always will be. Nate • (chatter) 16:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »charting on CBC Radio 3, but that's now much more clearly deprecated as a WP:BADCHART that cannot get a band over NMUSIC #2 by itself anymore, and they haven't...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:SINGLENETWORK chart failing WP:BADCHARTS which violate WP:NOT#PROMOTION Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:29, 15 July 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Comment - That might be true. But the chart that's used is listed on Wp:BADCHARTS, so is automatically discounted. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What...
Click to read more »Cashbox or other RS charts, but in absence of a source that rules out WP:BADCHART, there's nothing that backs up the claim. Her own website states the song...
Click to read more »NMUSIC #8, and the chart success claims derive from an uncertified WP:BADCHART (Mediabase), not from the publication (Billboard) that actually qualifies...
Click to read more »March 2009 (UTC) Delete: unofficial non-notable chart, may qualify as WP:BADCHARTS. JamesBurns (talk) 01:06, 15 March 2009 (UTC) Delete as not notable --Boston...
Click to read more »The attempted notability claim here is that the song charted on a WP:BADCHART that does not pass NMUSIC's charting criterion (which is looking for IFPI-certified...
Click to read more »chart included (which would be the saving grace) is disallowed per WP:BADCHARTS. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 14:58, 30 September 2012 (UTC) Redirect to Nicole...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS Passportguy (talk) 15:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Delete and add to WP:BADCHARTS, the site from which this is sourced is a forum. Ten Pound Hammer, his...
Click to read more »mill song which only charted on the Billboard Twitter Real-Time (on WP:BADCHARTS) and made it to 90 on the TurnTable Top 100 for Nigeria (not on WP:GOODCHARTS)...
Click to read more »number-ones of a dubious and unreliable Media Traffic chart, also listed at WP:BADCHARTS. Widr (talk) 13:08, 29 August 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »number-ones of a dubious and unreliable Media Traffic chart, also listed at WP:BADCHARTS. Widr (talk) 13:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Some assertations of notability, but all the charts mentioned are on WP:BADCHARTS (Australian Country Tracks). The awards won do not seem to be notable...
Click to read more »charts such as Latvia and the Polish National Charts, both listed on WP:BADCHARTS, but, since neither chart is permitted, it doesn't count as a chart. References...
Click to read more »countries, the majority of which have been disallowed on Wikipedia per WP:BADCHARTS Paul75 (talk) 03:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Merge with the album Super...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Single network chart failing WP:BADCHARTS. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 08:30, 3 March 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »chart, which is considered a WP:SINGLENETWORK chart and listed at WP:BADCHARTS. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:08, 17 July 2015 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) Jeodin has been edit-warring WP:BADCHARTS into Lass uns laufen for some time. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. This finally...
Click to read more »parent album. The only chart I found it on was a depracated chart WP:BADCHARTS. The article is not likely to expand. Notability of the artist is also...
Click to read more »party notability or charting methodology and failing lists present at WP:BADCHARTS. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 08:28, 3 March 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »01:16, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Comment it could possibly be included on WP:BADCHARTS. It doesn't appear to be there already, unless I skipped over it somehow...
Click to read more »apply to Heart Surgery Isn't That Bad... since it was a charted song. WP:BADCHARTS suggests the chart is not reliable, but it still is a chart, it's something...
Click to read more »notability per WP:MUSIC. As an aside, the Aussie country singles charts are WP:BADCHARTS. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention)...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable musician. Claimed charting is BADCHARTS. Touring lacks coverage. Running three non notable businesses does not...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Dubious and unreliable Media Traffic chart, also listed at WP:BADCHARTS. Widr (talk) 13:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »claim with an independent reliable source (It would qualify under WP:BADCHARTS anyway as it appears to be a sourced from a "single vendor"). Does not...
Click to read more »peaked at #16 on the Canadian iTunes R&B Charts but iTunes doesn't pass WP:BADCHARTS. CBS527Talk 17:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC) Delete - non-notable WP:MUSICBIO...
Click to read more »reached No. 1 in the iTunes chart, this is considered unreliable under WP:BADCHARTS. The cited sources are standard press releases, and I cannot find any...
Click to read more »Chart performance for Aleyce Simmonds version is chart that's on WP:BADCHARTS. Neither McCann's nor Herndon's version charted, nor did any version receive...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) I would think that if the chart meets WP:BADCHARTS, then there's no reason to archive the #1 hits on it. Fails WP:RS. Ten...
Click to read more »him of manipulating iTunes sales to force a charting position, but WP:BADCHARTS discourages mention of iTunes and the sources didn't look 100% solid,...
Click to read more »WP:NMUSIC unremarkable band fails WP:GNG. Beatport is considered as a WP:BADCHARTS and should not be used for notability purposes.--MassiveYR ♠ 12:02, 16...
Click to read more »has charted only in the Bulgarian Top 40, a chart which is listed in WP:BADCHARTS. Since that chart is not valid, the song has effectively not charted at...
Click to read more »— Berean Hunter (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC) Weak delete per WP:BADCHART. I wouldn't say Spotify has become to the professional music world what...
Click to read more »July 2018 (UTC) @Ultimograph5: iTunes chart is not a valid factor WP:BADCHARTS. Only official charts. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 04:36, 3 July 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »there's almost nothing else of substance stated here, and other than the WP:BADCHARTS the only other reference here is an unrecoverable dead link from a shortlived...
Click to read more »suitable source, but of the article's other sources: Top40-Charts.com is WP:BADCHARTS; MTV is self-published; DRT is not WP:GOODCHARTS; Record World is a reprint...
Click to read more »number-ones of a dubious and unreliable Media Traffic chart, also listed at WP:BADCHARTS. Widr (talk) 13:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »published by Billboard Publications. top40-charts.com has been listed in WP:BADCHARTS and should not be used as a source. ARIA has end-of-year Australian charts...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:SINGLENETWORK chart failing WP:BADCHARTS which violate WP:NOT#PROMOTION Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:10, 15 July 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »all non-WP:RS sources, WP:SINGLEVENDOR unsuitable charts and other WP:BADCHARTS and Youtube view counts. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:10, 11 September...
Click to read more »grow beyond stub. Has only charted on Los 40 Principales, and, per WP:BADCHARTS, Los 40 Principales is not to be used. Previous efforts to redirect article...
Click to read more »Songwriter Chats" (the fact remains unreferenced) which is one of the WP:BADCHARTS. She has received scarce coverage and has not achieved anything notable...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable promo single. Claimed charting is BADCHARTS. No significant sales, no national rotation. Lacks coverage in Independent...
Click to read more »September 2018 (UTC) Delete or redirect. The Spanish article cites WP:BADCHARTS sources for the presumed #1 spots. Reliable sources are required instead...
Click to read more »the Bon Jovi discography any other information in unsourced and from WP:BADCHARTS. This article should be deleted and any valuable sourced information be...
Click to read more »Singles Chart (2nd nomination). The Israeli Singles Chart has been on WP:BADCHARTS for a similar length of time. It's a single-network voting playlist: essentially...
Click to read more »A consensus of editors also found the MYX charts unreliable (see WP:BADCHARTS and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MYX Hit Chart). Magnolia677 (talk)...
Click to read more »beyond the purely local scene. Chart success is on a non-IFPI certified WP:BADCHART, not on one that can confer notability per NMUSIC #2; appearing on local...
Click to read more »number-ones of a dubious and unreliable Media Traffic chart, also listed at WP:BADCHARTS. Widr (talk) 13:11, 29 August 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »sales charts". It has ranked 59 on Sverigetopplistan, which is not a WP:BADCHART. बिनोद थारू (talk) 05:05, 26 November 2023 (UTC) Per WP:NSINGLE: Has been...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:SINGLENETWORK chart failing WP:BADCHARTS which violate WP:NOT#PROMOTION Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:12, 15 July 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »chart for a national radio network it seems this completely avoids WP:BADCHARTS. Article has been improved and even if sourced by the network itself it's...
Click to read more »singles are on the Australian Country Tracks chart, which is listed at WP:BADCHARTS as an unreliable chart. There are claims of notability through awards...
Click to read more »either way. One one hand, platform-specific charts like iTunes fails WP:BADCHARTS, but that being said, usually something popular enough to top even a "bad...
Click to read more »not significant for inclusion, let alone establishing notability (WP:BADCHARTS). In any case, a stand-alone page is not justified because it can be covered...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:SINGLENETWORK chart failing WP:BADCHARTS which violate WP:NOT#PROMOTION Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:09, 15 July 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »longer allow links to this site to be added, thanks to a listing on WP:BADCHARTS, XlinxBot's revert list, and some diligent follow-up by human editors...
Click to read more »notability in and of itself -- and the charting claims are tied to WP:BADCHARTS like CMJ and FMQB, where NMUSIC requires IFPI-certified charts on the...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:SINGLENETWORK chart failing WP:BADCHARTS which violate WP:NOT#PROMOTION Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:12, 15 July 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »chart provider it's talking about. Since the world is filled with WP:BADCHARTS that aren't support for notability (iTunes, standalone radio stations...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:SINGLENETWORK chart failing WP:BADCHARTS which violate WP:NOT#PROMOTION Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:10, 15 July 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »contribs) 01:12, 17 June 2017 (UTC) As I wrote on your talk page, WP:BADCHARTS states that the iTunes Store is not a chart. They do not meet any notability...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BAND, charted on Radio Disney which is listed on WP:BADCHARTS. No other claims to fame, no secondary sources save one listing in the...
Click to read more »notability. Even if it were, there's no mention of the Taiwan charts at WP:BADCHARTS or WP:GOODCHARTS. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters...
Click to read more »User:Joesimnett —Preceding undated comment added 19:18, 4 December 2018 (UTC) WP:BADCHARTS The iTunes Store is not a chart. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:22, 4 December...
Click to read more »charts are unreliable for purposes of establishing notability; see WP:BADCHARTS. Otherwise this artist is only present in the typical social media and...
Click to read more »and the Portugese and Bulgarian charts are listed as unreliable at WP:BADCHARTS, which only leaves the Hot Dance Club Play chart position. The article...
Click to read more »but the iTunes UK singles chart, a deprecated chart according to WP:BADCHARTS. Independent coverage seems to be limited to local press articles. Best...
Click to read more »almost entirely unverifiable. Regardless of outcome, should be added to WP:BADCHARTS. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps •...
Click to read more »me confirm it. I've found no evidence of this particular chart in our badcharts list. - Mgm|(talk) 09:13, 3 December 2009 (UTC) If for some reason, I...
Click to read more »put out by American Idol Alumni." Idolwaves obviously falls under WP:BADCHARTS. If he actually appeared on the show rather than the audition rounds,...
Click to read more »with the exception of this one userfied article: the UWC is listed on WP:BADCHARTS, and all references to it are removed on sight.—Kww(talk) 16:13, 2 May...
Click to read more »time on the project as single-source chart are not minor, they're WP:BADCHARTS. A minor chart is one that is not one of the main charts. Walter Görlitz...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Previously deleted twice. Band's chart entries are on WP:BADCHARTS; awards do not appear to be notable; sources smell of WP:REFBOMBing. Doesn't...
Click to read more »sources. Also, I removed a listing of iTunes Charts, which are on WP:BADCHARTS. 3a. No sections on critical reception of their works. Also, I know Dia...
Click to read more »really a single-vendor chart like Spotify or iTunes instead, those are WP:BADCHARTs that cannot confer notability. The only "source" present here at all for...
Click to read more »Tyler is not a credited writer of that song. Claim of iTunes charting (a badchart anyway) is not supported by a source. A search found nothing good. duffbeerforme...
Click to read more »strongest things here are charting on iTunes, which is deprecated by WP:BADCHARTS as not satisfying NMUSIC's "charting hit" criterion (the hit has to be...
Click to read more »charts is considered reliable, and the chart is not inclued on the WP:BADCHARTS. Greenock125 (talk) 20:13, 29 April 2012 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:NSONG with...
Click to read more »opinion piece in the Minnesota Daily. @LilliamPumpernickl134: See WP:BADCHARTS which says "Spotify: Charts pertaining to only one specific retailer should...
Click to read more »hits that did not really chart (or which charted only on a non-notable WP:BADCHART) or nominations for awards that are not prominent enough to pass criterion...
Click to read more »(UTC) WP:BADCHARTS. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC) @Duffbeerforme: To be fair, Upcoming100.com is not on the WP:BADCHARTS list. Perhaps...
Click to read more »vendor chart (Anghami) that his songs have appeared on is considered a WP:BADCHART. The Top Naija Music Awards is not a credible award in my opinion. Versace1608 ...
Click to read more »singles, but according to discussion at Talk:2009 in country music and WP:BADCHARTS, the Aussie country charts don't count. The sources are either primary...
Click to read more »are not national. The charts for Rock 108 (which should not be used (WP:BADCHARTS)) suggest local rotation there but claim of 99x rotation is not verified...
Click to read more »information on obscure shopping malls that were demolished 20 years ago. WP:BADCHARTS exists specifically to thwart usage of charts whose positions cannot be...
Click to read more »Apart from top40-charts.com being listed as a website to avoid at WP:BADCHARTS, if you actually bothered looking at the source, you would see that it's...
Click to read more »Comment that billboard you refer to looks like something straight out of WP:BADCHARTS and hardly serves to demonstrate sufficient notability of this artist...
Click to read more »is not inherited. The iTune chart is specifically precluded under WP:BADCHARTS and I can't find anything else to demonstrate lasting notability. ~dom...
Click to read more »(UTC) Hi NMGS19, Unfortunately Beatport charts are considered to be WP:BADCHARTS Ceethekreator (talk) 16:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC) Hi Ceethekreator, thank...
Click to read more »delete. Listmeister (talk) 20:11, 12 April 2013 (UTC) Per Wikipedia:Badcharts#Deprecated_charts, a guideline, retailer-specific charts, including iTunes...
Click to read more »DrColePorter 03:42, 30 December 2010 (UTC) No it doesn't. iTunes is on WP:BADCHARTS. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention)...
Click to read more »music for a podcast -- and the "charting" claims here are all tied to WP:BADCHARTS rather than notability-conferring charts: notability because charting...
Click to read more »redirect have been thwarted by an IP under the misapprehension that WP:BADCHARTS is an exhaustive list of every bad chart. Given that I pretty much compiled...
Click to read more »non-notable radio airplay charts (referenced to a website to avoid per WP:BADCHARTS), links to user-generated content from iMDb and the like to prove the...
Click to read more »criteria, there is no evidence per my WP:BEFORE that any are met. WP:BADCHARTS applies to the claim that the band has charted. —Alalch E. 06:11, 7 December...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable musician. CMT are badcharts anf not sourced. She lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. A...
Click to read more »information; no reason to keep chart info related to a chart listed on WP:BADCHARTS. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention)...
Click to read more »methodology or claim to significance, so would appear to be a candidate for WP:BADCHARTS. The sources are: a link to a podcast episode about the album; an interview...
Click to read more »published by Billboard Publications. top40-charts.com has been listed in WP:BADCHARTS and should not be used as a source. ARIA has end-of-year Australian charts...
Click to read more »WP:Record charts. The list of charts to specifically avoid is located at WP:BADCHARTS, while a list of reliable sources for chart positions and certifications...
Click to read more »@Sockie16: the iTunes chart is not considered an important chart per WP:BADCHARTS. Social media such as Twitter and YouTube are not generally considered...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Parody group. Also iTunes is not a reliable chart per WP:BADCHARTS. Rockysmile11(talk) 21:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC) Keep there are an impressive...
Click to read more »hits that did not really chart (or which charted only on a non-notable WP:BADCHART) or nominations for awards that are not prominent enough to pass criterion...
Click to read more »combination of radio play and listener requests, so it would certainly be WP:BADCHARTS. Article is pure WP:PROMO. Richard3120 (talk) 21:02, 10 November 2016...
Click to read more »October 2016 (UTC) A note to this effect should probably be added to WP:BADCHARTS - David Gerard (talk) 05:27, 11 October 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Nominator covers the problems with the sources fairly well, as well as WP:BADCHARTS. Additional RS are only tangentially about the subject, or trivial namechecks...
Click to read more »December 2018 (UTC) Actually article is really poorly written. Per WP:BADCHARTS, I don't believe that charting on Highest Global Chart rank automatically...
Click to read more »any credibility at all, and, should we delete them and list them on WP:BADCHARTS, there will no charts for South America. An entire continent lost. Not...
Click to read more »if the chart is unverifiable and/or would otherwise be included on WP:BADCHARTS — there's some Mediabase chart AFD floating around right now with positions...
Click to read more »not confirm the statement, and even so, Beatport is unreliable per WP:BADCHARTS. Delete per WP:PROMOTION. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:18, 15 April...
Click to read more »used on quite a few song articles within wikipedia, and not listed as WP:BADCHARTS. Musicline is difficult to use for most editors as it's all in German...
Click to read more »territory. Album appearances, and soundtracks are unsourced. According to WP:BADCHARTS, Acharts should not be used if there is another available source for chartings...
Click to read more »For WP:MUSIC, Amazon and iTunes are not national music charts, see WP:BADCHARTS. I would think Side Effect is a non-notable film and nothing in the sources...
Click to read more »acharts.us was being used as a reference, a deprecated chart listed on WP:BADCHARTS Finally, I was trying to get in touch with the GA reviewer, but he or...
Click to read more »2409:4073:2105:B4E8:0:0:359:C8B1 (talk) 10:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC) IP, please see WP:BADCHARTS: "Charts pertaining to only one specific retailer should not be used."...
Click to read more »done back in 2016 to circumvent the fact that said charts were on WP:BADCHARTS due to their positions not being archived, which makes it a WP:NOTWEBHOST...
Click to read more »unfortunately, none of your changes meet the notability criteria. 1) Per WP:BADCHARTS, Beatport is not a recognised chart as it is a single vendor chart. 2)...
Click to read more »Archives of positions on the Canadian Country chart which is listed on WP:BADCHARTS. Editor has been absent since October, so there is no foreseeable use...
Click to read more »have charted, none of the charts are recognized by Wikipedia, per WP:BADCHARTS. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »World Albums Top 40/World Singles Top 40 For more information, see WP:BADCHARTS If you want to get involved in this project, please add your name with...
Click to read more »deleting the Cash Box positions from other articles and adding it to WP:BADCHARTS since the positions can't be verified. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and...
Click to read more »charts is considered reliable, and the chart is not inclued on the WP:BADCHARTS. Greenock125 (talk) 19:51, 29 April 2012 (UTC) Keep. Significant coverage...
Click to read more »charts mentioned in the article are from iTunes, which is listed at WP:BADCHARTS. The only coverage I could find that came close to being significant was...
Click to read more »stations which just air American artists and call it a day). It's not a WP:BADCHARTS...because it isn't even a chart. It's just a carousel article which exists...
Click to read more »us here to check the hits. I have and I only found one, that being a WP:BADCHART. Someone else managed to find one other ref to a better chart. That's it...
Click to read more »"guideline"? The majority of my edits are music and I was thinking of:- WP:BADCHARTS - Deprecated Charts - "This is a list of charts which should not be included...
Click to read more »charing on Apple Music music chart. However, this chart is considered a WP:BADCHART. References 2, 4, and 10 are unreliable promotional references. References...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:SINGLENETWORK chart failing WP:BADCHARTS which violate WP:NOT#PROMOTION Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:29, 15 July 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »does not have a searchable database. Charts that are listed under WP:BADCHARTS should not be used. Argentina CAPIF (albums only): Official website Mirror...
Click to read more »Delete: not compelling argument for keep. Fails WP:MUSIC. Last fm is a BADCHART under WP:MUSIC. Googled the man and very little came up. How this article...
Click to read more »22:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Comment The iTunes charts are listed on WP:BADCHARTS, and should not be viewed as qualifying as "charts" in order to satisfy...
Click to read more »just noticed, several of the charts they were listed as topping were WP:BADCHARTS. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:00, 26 April 2014 (UTC) I guess you are talking...
Click to read more »"GLBT Hall of Fame" doesn't assist notability, and non-IFPI certified WP:BADCHARTS that don't count as notability for the purposes of clearing WP:NMUSIC's...
Click to read more »the United World chart (a chart deleted from Wikipedia, listed at WP:BADCHARTS, listed in XlinkBot's revert list ... just the worst of the worst). He...
Click to read more »Colombian, and min-skirt. Done. Per WP:BADCHARTS, removed information about video countdowns. WP:BADCHARTS says nothing about video countdowns. I believe...
Click to read more »information, and especially not a WP:BADCHART archive. Stifle (talk) 16:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC) Delete, per WP:BADCHARTS and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United...
Click to read more »for edit warring and I have warned 89.155.180.224 about violating WP:BADCHARTS. He hasn't listened. I recommend 72 hours for 89 and a week for Connie...
Click to read more »tsort.info to list international chart positions?!!!! That violates WP:BADCHARTS! You seriously need to check harder if the aritcle entirely meets 1(c)...
Click to read more »several warnings of being told not to add charts that are listed under WP:BADCHARTS (charts that are prohibited in music articles), the user stopped editing...
Click to read more »block log) was blocked for constantly inserting the charts that fail WP:BADCHARTS into Celestial (RBD album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »consolidated list of charts to be avoided, which ultimately resulted in WP:BADCHARTS. I produced the bulk of WP:Record charts/sourcing guide, aka WP:GOODCHARTS...
Click to read more »WP:GOODCHARTS. Please help the ongoing addition of erroneous content and WP:BADCHARTS. --Legolas (talk2me) 05:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC) He is from Canada that...
Click to read more »have been inserting information that violates WP:Record charts and WP:BADCHARTS into articles related to the group 30 Seconds to Mars. Neon White and...
Click to read more »block log) has been blocked twice for adding Brazilian charts (which fail WP:BADCHARTS into articles related to RBD, as have his socks Blandinocm (talk · contribs ·...
Click to read more »Also re: bubbling under, see WP:BADCHARTS. Nikthestunned 16:44, 22 October 2016 (UTC) I'm very familiar with WP:BADCHARTS and nowhere on that page does...
Click to read more »content, additional of unreliable sources and repeated addition of WP:BADCHARTS requires some sort of administrator intervention. Lil-unique1 (talk) 16:14...
Click to read more »some of it is a bit convoluted at time (there's WP:GOODCHARTS and WP:BADCHARTS stuff to know, for example.) But the problem isn't just "not knowing"...
Click to read more »coverage. The long-deleted United World Chart and various other charts at WP:BADCHARTS went through the same thing: people were citing the positions here and...
Click to read more »Billboard glitches, those peaks will not show up on the site and from WP:BADCHARTS, acharts.us can be used as an alternate source. Since I don't know that...
Click to read more »I assume the myriad citations to chart positions don't contain any WP:BADCHARTS violations? Oppose until issues are cleaned up. I'll need to run through...
Click to read more »version of the article, AngusWOOF explained that you should look at WP:BADCHARTS. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC) Thank you for the help...
Click to read more »Charts in France and Aficia. I believe Zobble.de, as explained at WP:BADCHARTS, is licensed by the Official Charts Company-licensed Hit Music magazine...
Click to read more »has a few bad archives: Italian, Portugese and Worldwide Single (see WP:BADCHARTS). But the rest are fine.--12345abcxyz20082009 (talk) 11:17, 9 September...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC) Internet charts are not reliable per WP:BADCHARTS. If he were on the main Country Breakout chart from Music Row, then maybe...
Click to read more »when it comes to reliability. Why are they now reliable? aCharts: WP:BADCHARTS states that aCharts is not reliable only for some countries like Italy...
Click to read more »→ "in August 2014" Done iTunes rankings shouldn't be included per WP:BADCHARTS Done The "M" in AllMusic should be capitalized Done Only "Billboard"...
Click to read more »reliable (see WP:CHARTS) Done No sources in this article are listed in WP:BADCHARTS. EditorEat ma talk page up, scotty! 18:33, 16 July 2013 (UTC) British...
Click to read more »Charts in France and Aficia. I believe Zobble.de, as explained at WP:BADCHARTS, is licensed by the Official Charts Company-licensed Hit Music magazine...
Click to read more »consolidated list of charts to be avoided, which ultimately resulted in WP:BADCHARTS. I produced the bulk of WP:Record charts/sourcing guide, aka WP:GOODCHARTS...
Click to read more »has been deemed as a non-notable chart with dubious methodology (see WP:BADCHARTS). Out of all the songs in the category, only two come from a reliable...
Click to read more »chart" as including campus radio charts. List of record charts and WP:BADCHARTS might help with this discussion. Fences&Windows 22:11, 1 December 2009...
Click to read more »tied to campus radio, meaning !earshot, meaning non-IFPI-certified WP:BADCHART — and nothing else here, neither in the substance nor in the sourcing,...
Click to read more »makes the band notable under WP:BAND. R&R is not listed in either WP:BADCHARTS or WP:GOODCHARTS, so whether Windows meets criterion 2 is debatable. As...
Click to read more »WP:NSONGS, because none of the charts are notable charts (some on WP:BADCHARTS, others just plain unsourced or non-notable). Article has fake references...
Click to read more »Billboard glitches, those peaks will not show up on the site and from WP:BADCHARTS, acharts.us can be used as an alternate source. Since I don't know that...
Click to read more »(UTC) We have a list of charts that have been deemed unreliable in WP:BADCHARTS. Unfortunately, we are having to take care of enforcement manually, and...
Click to read more »cited to support them isn't actually Billboard -- it's an unreliable WP:BADCHART provider called Alphacharts, which is not accepted as a notability-conferring...
Click to read more »tree. This is based on the United World Chart, which is listed at WP:BADCHARTS and was deleted per WP:Articles for deletion/United World Chart. An article...
Click to read more »Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts, the Rolling Stone chart has been deemed a WP:BADCHART due to faulty methodology. Since that chart has been deemed unreliable...
Click to read more »time on the project as single-source chart are not minor, they're WP:BADCHARTS. A minor chart is one that is not one of the main charts. Walter Görlitz...
Click to read more »sources. Has not charted on a countries national chart, Beatport charts are BADCHARTS. duffbeerforme (talk) 02:19, 20 August 2014 (UTC) No pass on WP:MUSIC#5...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per WP:BADCHARTS - RD (Talk) 17:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC) Strong delete Chile doesn't have an official chart. WP:BADCHARTS says it all. Ten...
Click to read more »that a song did well on the iTunes charts, but that's a single-vendor WP:BADCHART that does not pass NMUSIC's charting criterion -- notability because charting...
Click to read more »and WP:MUSICBIO. No awards. Billboard charts are deprecated, per WP:BADCHARTS. Sources cited in article are primary sources (interviews) or trivial...
Click to read more »of the charts at the Russian Wikipedia satisfy chart requirements (WP:BADCHARTS discourages Apple Music and Spotify charts, because they are not record...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:BAND, charted on Radio Disney which is listed on WP:BADCHARTS. No other claims to fame, no secondary sources save one listing in the...
Click to read more »notability claims here are charting #102 on Canada's campus radio charts (a WP:BADCHART that cannot establish musical notability, as it isn't IFPI-certified),...
Click to read more »put out by American Idol Alumni." Idolwaves obviously falls under WP:BADCHARTS. If he actually appeared on the show rather than the audition rounds,...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Per WP:BADCHARTS and this AFD, the Canadian country music charts published by R&R/Nielsen...
Click to read more »has a few bad archives: Italian, Portugese and Worldwide Single (see WP:BADCHARTS). But the rest are fine.--12345abcxyz20082009 (talk) 11:17, 9 September...
Click to read more »WP:NMUSIC unremarkable band fails WP:GNG. Beatport is considered as a WP:BADCHARTS and should not be used for notability purposes.--MassiveYR ♠ 12:02, 16...
Click to read more »May 2018 (UTC) RecoChoku is listed as one of deprecated charts in WP:BADCHARTS. You need to show that it has charted in one of the accepted Japanese...
Click to read more »candidates to be added to the WP:BADCHARTS list. For those that don't get involved in the song articles, being listed on WP:BADCHARTS makes all references to that...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable chart without any known methodology, fails WP:BADCHARTS. Should be deleted and pinging Kww who has a better knowledge. —Indian:BIO...
Click to read more »chart included (which would be the saving grace) is disallowed per WP:BADCHARTS. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 14:58, 30 September 2012 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NMUSIC...
Click to read more »Comment - That might be true. But the chart that's used is listed on Wp:BADCHARTS, so is automatically discounted. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What...
Click to read more »22:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Comment The iTunes charts are listed on WP:BADCHARTS, and should not be viewed as qualifying as "charts" in order to satisfy...
Click to read more »notability in and of itself -- and the charting claims are tied to WP:BADCHARTS like CMJ and FMQB, where NMUSIC requires IFPI-certified charts on the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS Passportguy (talk) 15:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Delete and add to WP:BADCHARTS, the site from which this is sourced is a forum. Ten Pound Hammer, his...
Click to read more »(UTC) WP:BADCHARTS. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC) @Duffbeerforme: To be fair, Upcoming100.com is not on the WP:BADCHARTS list. Perhaps...
Click to read more »another article based on the United World Chart, a chart listed on WP:BADCHARTS. By the creator of Best selling albums in 2009, which is going down in...
Click to read more »(UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Casshums (talk • contribs) WP:BADCHARTS. Neither iTunes nor Amazon are charts. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:47, 20...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC) Tagged as CSD G4 repost Obviously a WP:BADCHART with very little authority in Brazil. Nate • (chatter) 21:46, 31 May 2009...
Click to read more »Talk 04:37, 28 August 2021 (UTC) I kinda wonder if we'd consider it a WP:BADCHARTS nowadays - the Flavour of NZ source states Not sales based music charts;...
Click to read more »and the Portugese and Bulgarian charts are listed as unreliable at WP:BADCHARTS, which only leaves the Hot Dance Club Play chart position. The article...
Click to read more »is not inherited. The iTune chart is specifically precluded under WP:BADCHARTS and I can't find anything else to demonstrate lasting notability. ~dom...
Click to read more »notable on its own. JJL (talk) 00:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC) Delete The WP:BADCHARTS list shows that charts formed by viewer feedback via texts and phone calls...
Click to read more »(note that Radio Disney is not a valid chart per WP:Record charts and WP:BADCHARTS). "Sources" are one PR interview on MTV, one passing mention in a tour...
Click to read more »suitable source, but of the article's other sources: Top40-Charts.com is WP:BADCHARTS; MTV is self-published; DRT is not WP:GOODCHARTS; Record World is a reprint...
Click to read more »number-ones of a dubious and unreliable Media Traffic chart, also listed at WP:BADCHARTS. Widr (talk) 13:11, 29 August 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »apply to Heart Surgery Isn't That Bad... since it was a charted song. WP:BADCHARTS suggests the chart is not reliable, but it still is a chart, it's something...
Click to read more »support it. The strongest notability claim here is charting on Spotify, a BADCHART that cannot count toward passing the charting criterion at all -- and apart...
Click to read more »used on quite a few song articles within wikipedia, and not listed as WP:BADCHARTS. Musicline is difficult to use for most editors as it's all in German...
Click to read more »if the chart is unverifiable and/or would otherwise be included on WP:BADCHARTS — there's some Mediabase chart AFD floating around right now with positions...
Click to read more »there's almost nothing else of substance stated here, and other than the WP:BADCHARTS the only other reference here is an unrecoverable dead link from a shortlived...
Click to read more »singles, but according to discussion at Talk:2009 in country music and WP:BADCHARTS, the Aussie country charts don't count. The sources are either primary...
Click to read more »review could carry GNG. But earshot has since been deprecated as a WP:BADCHART because it's not IFPI-certified, one album review in one publication isn't...
Click to read more »Delete: not compelling argument for keep. Fails WP:MUSIC. Last fm is a BADCHART under WP:MUSIC. Googled the man and very little came up. How this article...
Click to read more »information; no reason to keep chart info related to a chart listed on WP:BADCHARTS. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention)...
Click to read more »Apart from top40-charts.com being listed as a website to avoid at WP:BADCHARTS, if you actually bothered looking at the source, you would see that it's...
Click to read more »For WP:MUSIC, Amazon and iTunes are not national music charts, see WP:BADCHARTS. I would think Side Effect is a non-notable film and nothing in the sources...
Click to read more »topping a genre chart in !earshot, but earshot is a non-IFPI-certified WP:BADCHART that does not count toward NMUSIC's charting criterion. The only other...
Click to read more »chart for a national radio network it seems this completely avoids WP:BADCHARTS. Article has been improved and even if sourced by the network itself it's...
Click to read more »described in their website) is considered serious, others you will find in WP:BADCHARTS not. Second point, yes, the Romanian branch of MF (www.mediaforest.ro)...
Click to read more »consolidated list of charts to be avoided, which ultimately resulted in WP:BADCHARTS. I produced the bulk of WP:Record charts/sourcing guide, aka WP:GOODCHARTS...
Click to read more »has charted only in the Bulgarian Top 40, a chart which is listed in WP:BADCHARTS. Since that chart is not valid, the song has effectively not charted at...
Click to read more »sources rather than genuinely reliable ones. iTunes is a single-vendor WP:BADCHART, not a record chart that confers notability under NMUSIC #2, so topping...
Click to read more »almost entirely unverifiable. Regardless of outcome, should be added to WP:BADCHARTS. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps •...
Click to read more »the Bon Jovi discography any other information in unsourced and from WP:BADCHARTS. This article should be deleted and any valuable sourced information be...
Click to read more »whether it just uses its own random process to compile a self-created BADCHART -- and so there can be no automatic presumption of notability, just because...
Click to read more »September 2018 (UTC) Delete or redirect. The Spanish article cites WP:BADCHARTS sources for the presumed #1 spots. Reliable sources are required instead...
Click to read more »information on obscure shopping malls that were demolished 20 years ago. WP:BADCHARTS exists specifically to thwart usage of charts whose positions cannot be...
Click to read more »July 2018 (UTC) @Ultimograph5: iTunes chart is not a valid factor WP:BADCHARTS. Only official charts. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 04:36, 3 July 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »claim with an independent reliable source (It would qualify under WP:BADCHARTS anyway as it appears to be a sourced from a "single vendor"). Does not...
Click to read more »countries, the majority of which have been disallowed on Wikipedia per WP:BADCHARTS Paul75 (talk) 03:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Merge with the album Super...
Click to read more »him of manipulating iTunes sales to force a charting position, but WP:BADCHARTS discourages mention of iTunes and the sources didn't look 100% solid,...
Click to read more »any credibility at all, and, should we delete them and list them on WP:BADCHARTS, there will no charts for South America. An entire continent lost. Not...
Click to read more »track listing or a reddit. fails WP:GNG. Beatport is considered as a WP:BADCHARTS and should not be used ofr notability purposes. Domdeparis (talk) 15:03...
Click to read more »A consensus of editors also found the MYX charts unreliable (see WP:BADCHARTS and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MYX Hit Chart). Magnolia677 (talk)...
Click to read more »non-primary, reliable or notable sources listed. Only notability is one non-WP:BADCHART. Potential WP:AUTO. Lazz_R 20:40, 12 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »"guideline"? The majority of my edits are music and I was thinking of:- WP:BADCHARTS - Deprecated Charts - "This is a list of charts which should not be included...
Click to read more »contribs) 01:12, 17 June 2017 (UTC) As I wrote on your talk page, WP:BADCHARTS states that the iTunes Store is not a chart. They do not meet any notability...
Click to read more »appear on any major music charts". Charts shown are those listed on WP:BADCHARTS. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 18:08, 1 May 2011 (UTC) That may...
Click to read more »charts is considered reliable, and the chart is not inclued on the WP:BADCHARTS. Greenock125 (talk) 20:13, 29 April 2012 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:NSONG with...
Click to read more »music for a podcast -- and the "charting" claims here are all tied to WP:BADCHARTS rather than notability-conferring charts: notability because charting...
Click to read more »charting claim doesn't pass NMUSIC #2, as it rests on an uncertified WP:BADCHART (Mediabase) rather than Canada's real notability-making pop charts (Billboard)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Parody group. Also iTunes is not a reliable chart per WP:BADCHARTS. Rockysmile11(talk) 21:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC) Keep there are an impressive...
Click to read more »Chart performance for Aleyce Simmonds version is chart that's on WP:BADCHARTS. Neither McCann's nor Herndon's version charted, nor did any version receive...
Click to read more »hits that did not really chart (or which charted only on a non-notable WP:BADCHART) or nominations for awards that are not prominent enough to pass criterion...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable musician. CMT are badcharts anf not sourced. She lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. A...
Click to read more »— Berean Hunter (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC) Weak delete per WP:BADCHART. I wouldn't say Spotify has become to the professional music world what...
Click to read more »number-ones of a dubious and unreliable Media Traffic chart, also listed at WP:BADCHARTS. Widr (talk) 13:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »reached No. 1 in the iTunes chart, this is considered unreliable under WP:BADCHARTS. The cited sources are standard press releases, and I cannot find any...
Click to read more »for deletion/MYX Hit Chart. The MYX chart has since been listed at WP:BADCHARTS, and it obviously violates WP:SINGLENETWORK. —Kww(talk) 22:36, 4 November...
Click to read more »parent album. The only chart I found it on was a depracated chart WP:BADCHARTS. The article is not likely to expand. Notability of the artist is also...
Click to read more »Comment that billboard you refer to looks like something straight out of WP:BADCHARTS and hardly serves to demonstrate sufficient notability of this artist...
Click to read more »NMUSIC #8, and the chart success claims derive from an uncertified WP:BADCHART (Mediabase), not from the publication (Billboard) that actually qualifies...
Click to read more »chart, which is considered a WP:SINGLENETWORK chart and listed at WP:BADCHARTS. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:08, 17 July 2015 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »all non-WP:RS sources, WP:SINGLEVENDOR unsuitable charts and other WP:BADCHARTS and Youtube view counts. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:10, 11 September...
Click to read more »Remove the Argentinian chart, since Los 40 Principales is part of WP:BADCHARTS In the Composition and reception section: "The saxophone sound from "Mr...
Click to read more »us here to check the hits. I have and I only found one, that being a WP:BADCHART. Someone else managed to find one other ref to a better chart. That's it...
Click to read more »peaked at #16 on the Canadian iTunes R&B Charts but iTunes doesn't pass WP:BADCHARTS. CBS527Talk 17:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC) Delete - non-notable WP:MUSICBIO...
Click to read more »charts such as Latvia and the Polish National Charts, both listed on WP:BADCHARTS, but, since neither chart is permitted, it doesn't count as a chart. References...
Click to read more »could verify the chart placement, it's actually a non-IFPI-certified WP:BADCHART that doesn't count toward getting an album or an artist over NMUSIC's charting...
Click to read more »grow beyond stub. Has only charted on Los 40 Principales, and, per WP:BADCHARTS, Los 40 Principales is not to be used. Previous efforts to redirect article...
Click to read more »me confirm it. I've found no evidence of this particular chart in our badcharts list. - Mgm|(talk) 09:13, 3 December 2009 (UTC) If for some reason, I...
Click to read more »"GLBT Hall of Fame" doesn't assist notability, and non-IFPI certified WP:BADCHARTS that don't count as notability for the purposes of clearing WP:NMUSIC's...
Click to read more »observations: the year-end charts published by UKChartsPlus are listed at WP:BADCHARTS, and the release history table needs !scope="row"| for consistency with...
Click to read more »Some assertations of notability, but all the charts mentioned are on WP:BADCHARTS (Australian Country Tracks). The awards won do not seem to be notable...
Click to read more »really a single-vendor chart like Spotify or iTunes instead, those are WP:BADCHARTs that cannot confer notability. The only "source" present here at all for...
Click to read more »October 2016 (UTC) A note to this effect should probably be added to WP:BADCHARTS - David Gerard (talk) 05:27, 11 October 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »01:16, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Comment it could possibly be included on WP:BADCHARTS. It doesn't appear to be there already, unless I skipped over it somehow...
Click to read more »discussions. North America1000 10:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC) Delete It's a WP:BADCHARTS and always will be. Nate • (chatter) 16:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »Songwriter Chats" (the fact remains unreferenced) which is one of the WP:BADCHARTS. She has received scarce coverage and has not achieved anything notable...
Click to read more »singles are on the Australian Country Tracks chart, which is listed at WP:BADCHARTS as an unreliable chart. There are claims of notability through awards...
Click to read more »unfortunately, none of your changes meet the notability criteria. 1) Per WP:BADCHARTS, Beatport is not a recognised chart as it is a single vendor chart. 2)...
Click to read more »User:Joesimnett —Preceding undated comment added 19:18, 4 December 2018 (UTC) WP:BADCHARTS The iTunes Store is not a chart. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:22, 4 December...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Single network chart failing WP:BADCHARTS. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 08:30, 3 March 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »charts mentioned in the article are from iTunes, which is listed at WP:BADCHARTS. The only coverage I could find that came close to being significant was...
Click to read more »not confirm the statement, and even so, Beatport is unreliable per WP:BADCHARTS. Delete per WP:PROMOTION. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:18, 15 April...
Click to read more »@Sockie16: the iTunes chart is not considered an important chart per WP:BADCHARTS. Social media such as Twitter and YouTube are not generally considered...
Click to read more »2409:4073:2105:B4E8:0:0:359:C8B1 (talk) 10:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC) IP, please see WP:BADCHARTS: "Charts pertaining to only one specific retailer should not be used."...
Click to read more »DrColePorter 03:42, 30 December 2010 (UTC) No it doesn't. iTunes is on WP:BADCHARTS. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention)...
Click to read more »redirect have been thwarted by an IP under the misapprehension that WP:BADCHARTS is an exhaustive list of every bad chart. Given that I pretty much compiled...
Click to read more »May 2011 (UTC) iTunes charts are not to be mentioned in articles per WP:Badcharts.—Iknow23 (talk) 00:36, 12 May 2011 (UTC) Although this entry meets the...
Click to read more »beyond the purely local scene. Chart success is on a non-IFPI certified WP:BADCHART, not on one that can confer notability per NMUSIC #2; appearing on local...
Click to read more »charting on CBC Radio 3, but that's now much more clearly deprecated as a WP:BADCHART that cannot get a band over NMUSIC #2 by itself anymore, and they haven't...
Click to read more »only chart they are on is one that is listed on WP:BADCHARTS. I'm not certain that the WP:BADCHARTS listing is justifiable, but I do know that no one has...
Click to read more »charts are unreliable for purposes of establishing notability; see WP:BADCHARTS. Otherwise this artist is only present in the typical social media and...
Click to read more »Singles Chart (2nd nomination). The Israeli Singles Chart has been on WP:BADCHARTS for a similar length of time. It's a single-network voting playlist: essentially...
Click to read more »UK's Official Charts Company, and not on the basis of just any randoid WP:BADCHART you can find — which means nothing stated here passes WP:NMUSIC, and the...
Click to read more »press releases distributed by newswire service Relaxnews. Possible WP:BADCHART candidate. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 04:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Also, I believe the digital chart should be removed per WP:USCHART/WP:BADCHARTS. Lastly, for the chart section, chartings in different years should appear...
Click to read more »deleting the Cash Box positions from other articles and adding it to WP:BADCHARTS since the positions can't be verified. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and...
Click to read more »coverage. The long-deleted United World Chart and various other charts at WP:BADCHARTS went through the same thing: people were citing the positions here and...
Click to read more »not significant for inclusion, let alone establishing notability (WP:BADCHARTS). In any case, a stand-alone page is not justified because it can be covered...
Click to read more »delete. Listmeister (talk) 20:11, 12 April 2013 (UTC) Per Wikipedia:Badcharts#Deprecated_charts, a guideline, retailer-specific charts, including iTunes...
Click to read more »May 2011 (UTC) iTunes charts are not to be mentioned in articles per WP:Badcharts.—Iknow23 (talk) 00:36, 12 May 2011 (UTC) Although this entry meets the...
Click to read more »March 2009 (UTC) Delete: unofficial non-notable chart, may qualify as WP:BADCHARTS. JamesBurns (talk) 01:06, 15 March 2009 (UTC) Delete as not notable --Boston...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Previously deleted twice. Band's chart entries are on WP:BADCHARTS; awards do not appear to be notable; sources smell of WP:REFBOMBing. Doesn't...
Click to read more »and WP:MUSICBIO. No awards. Billboard charts are deprecated, per WP:BADCHARTS. Sources cited in article are primary sources (interviews) or trivial...
Click to read more »May 2018 (UTC) RecoChoku is listed as one of deprecated charts in WP:BADCHARTS. You need to show that it has charted in one of the accepted Japanese...
Click to read more »(talk) 05:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC) Internet charts are not reliable per WP:BADCHARTS. If he were on the main Country Breakout chart from Music Row, then maybe...
Click to read more »recently edited by Kww: Special:AbuseFilter/81 - 8,491 hits enforcing WP:BADCHARTS (edited but did not create) Special:AbuseFilter/517 - 0 hits, train station...
Click to read more »opinion piece in the Minnesota Daily. @LilliamPumpernickl134: See WP:BADCHARTS which says "Spotify: Charts pertaining to only one specific retailer should...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable promo single. Claimed charting is BADCHARTS. No significant sales, no national rotation. Lacks coverage in Independent...
Click to read more »chart provider it's talking about. Since the world is filled with WP:BADCHARTS that aren't support for notability (iTunes, standalone radio stations...
Click to read more »but the iTunes UK singles chart, a deprecated chart according to WP:BADCHARTS. Independent coverage seems to be limited to local press articles. Best...
Click to read more »hits that did not really chart (or which charted only on a non-notable WP:BADCHART) or nominations for awards that are not prominent enough to pass criterion...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Dubious and unreliable Media Traffic chart, also listed at WP:BADCHARTS. Widr (talk) 13:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »either way. One one hand, platform-specific charts like iTunes fails WP:BADCHARTS, but that being said, usually something popular enough to top even a "bad...
Click to read more »have charted, none of the charts are recognized by Wikipedia, per WP:BADCHARTS. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »non-notable radio airplay charts (referenced to a website to avoid per WP:BADCHARTS), links to user-generated content from iMDb and the like to prove the...
Click to read more »stations which just air American artists and call it a day). It's not a WP:BADCHARTS...because it isn't even a chart. It's just a carousel article which exists...
Click to read more »strongest things here are charting on iTunes, which is deprecated by WP:BADCHARTS as not satisfying NMUSIC's "charting hit" criterion (the hit has to be...
Click to read more »notability. Even if it were, there's no mention of the Taiwan charts at WP:BADCHARTS or WP:GOODCHARTS. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters...
Click to read more »(UTC) Hi NMGS19, Unfortunately Beatport charts are considered to be WP:BADCHARTS Ceethekreator (talk) 16:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC) Hi Ceethekreator, thank...
Click to read more »notability per WP:MUSIC. As an aside, the Aussie country singles charts are WP:BADCHARTS. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention)...
Click to read more »Cashbox or other RS charts, but in absence of a source that rules out WP:BADCHART, there's nothing that backs up the claim. Her own website states the song...
Click to read more »Tyler is not a credited writer of that song. Claim of iTunes charting (a badchart anyway) is not supported by a source. A search found nothing good. duffbeerforme...
Click to read more »December 2018 (UTC) Actually article is really poorly written. Per WP:BADCHARTS, I don't believe that charting on Highest Global Chart rank automatically...
Click to read more »musician is a song that charted on Beatport, but that's a single-vendor WP:BADCHART that does not pass NMUSIC #2 (which requires national charts on the order...
Click to read more »combination of radio play and listener requests, so it would certainly be WP:BADCHARTS. Article is pure WP:PROMO. Richard3120 (talk) 21:02, 10 November 2016...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable musician. Claimed charting is BADCHARTS. Touring lacks coverage. Running three non notable businesses does not...
Click to read more »just noticed, several of the charts they were listed as topping were WP:BADCHARTS. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:00, 26 April 2014 (UTC) I guess you are talking...
Click to read more »are not national. The charts for Rock 108 (which should not be used (WP:BADCHARTS)) suggest local rotation there but claim of 99x rotation is not verified...
Click to read more »Nominator covers the problems with the sources fairly well, as well as WP:BADCHARTS. Additional RS are only tangentially about the subject, or trivial namechecks...
Click to read more »described in their website) is considered serious, others you will find in WP:BADCHARTS not. Second point, yes, the Romanian branch of MF (www.mediaforest.ro)...
Click to read more »needs to be different, however: it needs to look for violations of WP:BADCHARTS ... edits whose effect has been to insert a chart that has been determined...
Click to read more »party notability or charting methodology and failing lists present at WP:BADCHARTS. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 08:28, 3 March 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »reference. Crowley Broadcast Analysis isnt discussed at WP:GOODCHARTS or WP:BADCHARTS. (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 00:20, 1 July 2010 (UTC) These recent edits to...
Click to read more »Talk 04:37, 28 August 2021 (UTC) I kinda wonder if we'd consider it a WP:BADCHARTS nowadays - the Flavour of NZ source states Not sales based music charts;...
Click to read more »should be blocked, with a warning message that points the editor at WP:BADCHARTS. Reason:This would block addition of the most commonly added bogus charts...
Click to read more »sources (history)? I think it's a good practice. WP:GOODCHARTS and WP:BADCHARTS are the parallels in the music area, and I'm the primary author of them...
Click to read more »failed WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO because the chart failed WP:BADCHARTS (as argued by Magnolia677) and the article was promotional, had excessive...
Click to read more »insistence on adding charts that are either unsourced or are listed on WP:BADCHARTS. When I revert his edits, 83.109.100.230 comes to the rescue. Another...
Click to read more »sources (history)? I think it's a good practice. WP:GOODCHARTS and WP:BADCHARTS are the parallels in the music area, and I'm the primary author of them...
Click to read more »of adding unreliable sources, despite repeatedly being pointed to WP:BADCHARTS.[Talk:Cheap_Thrills_(song)#Colombia.5CCosta_Rica] (note: the IP is SalemHanna...
Click to read more »charts in articles (particularly song and album articles). Currently WP:BADCHARTS specifically disallows use of iTunes charts the discussion is on whether...
Click to read more »everyhit.com/ and the other three charts references. I don't much about WP:BADCHARTS or whatever. Are they all reliable sources for charting? Used in Californication...
Click to read more »(UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Casshums (talk • contribs) WP:BADCHARTS. Neither iTunes nor Amazon are charts. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:47, 20...
Click to read more »WP:MUSIC. John Nagle (talk) 22:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC) Nope, that's a WP:BADCHART. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC) United Family of Anomaly...
Click to read more »when it comes to reliability. Why are they now reliable? aCharts: WP:BADCHARTS states that aCharts is not reliable only for some countries like Italy...
Click to read more »with whose source I am deeply familiar with (especially as far as WP:BADCHARTS is concerned). What kind of source are "Columbia Records (2021). 30 (Media...
Click to read more »TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 14:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC) @TheGreatestLuvofAll: per WP:BADCHARTS, iTunes does not qualify, and in any case that source doesn't seem too...
Click to read more »discussions at WT:Record charts over the years, and it was listed on WP:BADCHARTS since the beginning) but I added the edit notice as just a portion of...
Click to read more »hits that did not really chart (or which charted only on a non-notable WP:BADCHART) or nominations for awards that are not prominent enough to pass criterion...
Click to read more »failed WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO because the chart failed WP:BADCHARTS (as argued by Magnolia677) and the article was promotional, had excessive...
Click to read more »on the article adding charts they have been told not to add before (WP:BADCHARTS). If the article is not protected, they will continue adding these charts...
Click to read more »Albums Chart. When i pointed out that the rules as WP:GOODCHARTS, WP:BADCHARTS and WP:record charts but the response from the user was "Im french, i...
Click to read more »observations: the year-end charts published by UKChartsPlus are listed at WP:BADCHARTS, and the release history table needs !scope="row"| for consistency with...
Click to read more »I assume the myriad citations to chart positions don't contain any WP:BADCHARTS violations? Oppose until issues are cleaned up. I'll need to run through...
Click to read more »acharts.us was being used as a reference, a deprecated chart listed on WP:BADCHARTS Finally, I was trying to get in touch with the GA reviewer, but he or...
Click to read more »reliable (see WP:CHARTS) Done No sources in this article are listed in WP:BADCHARTS. EditorEat ma talk page up, scotty! 18:33, 16 July 2013 (UTC) British...
Click to read more »sources. Also, I removed a listing of iTunes Charts, which are on WP:BADCHARTS. 3a. No sections on critical reception of their works. Also, I know Dia...
Click to read more »September 2010 (UTC) Since TenPoundHammer also listed the chart on WP:BADCHARTS (see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Manual_of_St...
Click to read more »→ "in August 2014" Done iTunes rankings shouldn't be included per WP:BADCHARTS Done The "M" in AllMusic should be capitalized Done Only "Billboard"...
Click to read more »81. Since it was released, the following charts have been added to WP:BADCHARTS: Australia Country Tracks Chile Singles Chart Chilean Singles Chart Columbia...
Click to read more »tsort.info to list international chart positions?!!!! That violates WP:BADCHARTS! You seriously need to check harder if the aritcle entirely meets 1(c)...
Click to read more »mill song which only charted on the Billboard Twitter Real-Time (on WP:BADCHARTS) and made it to 90 on the TurnTable Top 100 for Nigeria (not on WP:GOODCHARTS)...
Click to read more »everyhit.com/ and the other three charts references. I don't much about WP:BADCHARTS or whatever. Are they all reliable sources for charting? Used in Californication...
Click to read more »Colombian, and min-skirt. Done. Per WP:BADCHARTS, removed information about video countdowns. WP:BADCHARTS says nothing about video countdowns. I believe...
Click to read more »territory. Album appearances, and soundtracks are unsourced. According to WP:BADCHARTS, Acharts should not be used if there is another available source for chartings...
Click to read more »rationale: Per WP:OCAT this could be categorised as WP:TOPTEN, and also per WP:BADCHARTS, Spotify chart is NOT an official record chart in music-related articles...
Click to read more »Also, I believe the digital chart should be removed per WP:USCHART/WP:BADCHARTS. Lastly, for the chart section, chartings in different years should appear...
Click to read more »territory. Album appearances, and soundtracks are unsourced. According to WP:BADCHARTS, Acharts should not be used if there is another available source for chartings...
Click to read more »Remove the Argentinian chart, since Los 40 Principales is part of WP:BADCHARTS In the Composition and reception section: "The saxophone sound from "Mr...
Click to read more »be on WP:BADCHARTS due to a lack of an accessible archive, but the existence of worldradiohistory was enough to get them taken off WP:BADCHARTS. How else...
Click to read more »makes the band notable under WP:BAND. R&R is not listed in either WP:BADCHARTS or WP:GOODCHARTS, so whether Windows meets criterion 2 is debatable. As...
Click to read more »that a song did well on the iTunes charts, but that's a single-vendor WP:BADCHART that does not pass NMUSIC's charting criterion -- notability because charting...
Click to read more »hits that did not really chart (or which charted only on a non-notable WP:BADCHART) or nominations for awards that are not prominent enough to pass criterion...
Click to read more »vendor chart (Anghami) that his songs have appeared on is considered a WP:BADCHART. The Top Naija Music Awards is not a credible award in my opinion. Versace1608 ...
Click to read more »sales charts". It has ranked 59 on Sverigetopplistan, which is not a WP:BADCHART. बिनोद थारू (talk) 05:05, 26 November 2023 (UTC) Per WP:NSINGLE: Has been...
Click to read more »The attempted notability claim here is that the song charted on a WP:BADCHART that does not pass NMUSIC's charting criterion (which is looking for IFPI-certified...
Click to read more »charing on Apple Music music chart. However, this chart is considered a WP:BADCHART. References 2, 4, and 10 are unreliable promotional references. References...
Click to read more »criteria, there is no evidence per my WP:BEFORE that any are met. WP:BADCHARTS applies to the claim that the band has charted. —Alalch E. 06:11, 7 December...
Click to read more »methodology or claim to significance, so would appear to be a candidate for WP:BADCHARTS. The sources are: a link to a podcast episode about the album; an interview...
Click to read more »Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring over WP:BADCHARTS. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:11, 2 October 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »with whose source I am deeply familiar with (especially as far as WP:BADCHARTS is concerned). What kind of source are "Columbia Records (2021). 30 (Media...
Click to read more »to remove retailer-specific charts that are explicitly banned per WP:BADCHARTS - if you look through my editing history, music is a big interest of mine)...
Click to read more »