Redirect to:
Autopatrolled is a user right given to prolific creators of clean articles and pages in order to reduce the workload of the new pages patrol process on...
Click to read more »always checks the presence of autoreview for any automatic review, and possibly other restrictions on top of it, so 'autoreview' cannot be removed from autoconfirmed...
Click to read more »qualify for autoreview *at the time of the bot run*, the extension only autoreviews if *at the time of the edit* the user qualified for autoreview The first...
Click to read more »$wgGroupPermissions['sysop']['movestable'] = true; # Give bots autoreview $wgGroupPermissions['bot']['autoreview'] = true; # Give admins the ability to add/remove...
Click to read more »$wgGroupPermissions['reviewer']['review'] = true; $wgGroupPermissions['reviewer']['autoreview'] = true; $wgGroupPermissions['reviewer']['autoconfirmed'] = true;...
Click to read more »consensus by others has been made. Reviews When one has been granted autoreview, review, and rollback rights, it can be seen as a good sign, and from...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) There is no such group named "autoreview". It may have been removed. Eyesnore (pc) 17:09, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »this instance, among other things, users with questions about any new autoreview functionality might be assisted in knowing whom they might ask. Newyorkbrad...
Click to read more »specific version of a page by a user that has been granted the "review" or "autoreview" right that then sets that version of the page to the lowest level "stable"...
Click to read more »this only saves an actual reviewer a few seconds, it allows users with autoreview but not review rights to have their edits shown immediately. A similar...
Click to read more »talkpages and other namespaces Currently some Wikipedias use bots to autoreview based on time or rules. e.g., fiwiki: Stabilizerbot and PendingChangesBot...
Click to read more »flagged protection with reviewer usergroup and option to deactivate autoreview, is currently enabled on the testing site and fairly stable. For some...
Click to read more »certainly will be. Anonymous Dissident Utter 02:45, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Autoreview by mcginnly The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic...
Click to read more »severely limited. Wikipedia:Timed flagged revisions, a proposal to add timed autoreview to Pending Changes, to function as a softer(broader) protection tool....
Click to read more »want to allow autoreview on PC2 without review, then we need to create another userright for it, e.g. "super-autoreview", but "autoreview" cannot be used...
Click to read more »qbtarget); (428, 52, 5, 1) rupp.de/cgi-bin/wp-autoreview.pl?l=de&lemma='+pesctitle,'ar',qbtarget,'autoreview'); (428, 17, 1, 1) www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~krohn/wscan...
Click to read more »Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:22, 4 September 2014 (UTC) Perhaps 'autoreview' would be a better userright to add. At the moment pending changes level...
Click to read more »to have a single one deleted yet. Without requesting them, I was given Autoreview rights by an Admin I'd never encountered before, merely because he'd been...
Click to read more »problem (tentative delete) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User autoreview (keep) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Åland (delete) Wikipedia:Miscellany...
Click to read more »Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions...
Click to read more »-3) www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,354437,00.html (23, 19346, 0, 0) www.autoreview.ru/news/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=15956 (23, 100, 1, 1) findarticles...
Click to read more »taste. Kind regards. --Mcginnly | Natter 16:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC) Autoreview by Andyz Script The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic...
Click to read more »acting strange Finding anon user contribs Opening MIDI files in Wikipedia Autoreview In-N-Out Burger article Page size white space at top of article because...
Click to read more »15, 1, 1) agmotor.narod.ru/articles/corvette_ex.htm (8, 1, 1, 1) www.autoreview.ru/archive/2008/05/corvette/ (8, 64, 1, 1) 2009-04-17 12:55:43 (UTC):...
Click to read more »anonymous and new users. The proposed reviewing guidelines are located here. Autoreview may be deactivated for non-reviewers on a certain page to handle persistent...
Click to read more »summarised and referenced. best regards. Anlace 15:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC) Autoreview from AndyZ script The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic...
Click to read more »13 May 2010 (UTC) I think he has article experience, since he has the autoreview tool. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ message • changes) 23:13, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Oops...
Click to read more »this bot for autoreview requests is twofold: First, autoreview is relatively obscure compared to administratorship. Second, autoreview requests are a...
Click to read more »Reviewer permission, the Autoreview permission is extremely misleading. Even if it is eventually removed altogether, the Autoreview permission should be renamed...
Click to read more »identical to the autoreview user group that comes with the FlaggedRevs extension - current, autopatrolled users are a part of the "autoreview" user group)...
Click to read more »Lada TCR with a Renault 1.8 engine and an ice super race in Togliatti]. autoreview.ru (in Russian). 14 January 2019. Retrieved 2019-01-15. "Volvo understood...
Click to read more »changes. Bot option: if the last editor is a reviewer, autoreview that version, otherwise autoreview the last revid that is by a reviewer, or leave it unreviewed;...
Click to read more »autopatrol Automatically mark all edits made by the user as patrolled AP, GR autoreview Automatically mark all revisions made by the user as "accepted" PCR bigdelete...
Click to read more »too, and none of my article have ever been deleted (that I can recall). Autoreview would help make less work for others if given to me. :) - —Charles...
Click to read more »is vandalising the page, but it goes unnoticed, and editor B, with an autoreview bit (but who does not care about it), is adding some info (and ignoring...
Click to read more »S!lVER M. (talk) 23:12, 12 April 2017 (UTC) I would have removed the autoreview right as well, because you're creating articles full of spelling and grammar...
Click to read more »(UTC) This would be for non-admins so that they can gain the autopatrol/autoreview ability without being a full admin, kind of like how rollback is handled...
Click to read more »non-admin closures, given to select individuals the way that Rollback and Autoreview are. Let's just say that you have acknowledged the mistakes now, you're...
Click to read more »(UTC) There's more than just the hat collecting, global lock and using autoreview that was paired with GR rights. We are forgetting the dubious crosswiki...
Click to read more »I have found MediaWiki:Group-autoreview. Such page is also present at the German Wikipedia (de:MediaWiki:Group-autoreview) for the user right "Passive...
Click to read more »(globalblock-whitelist) Have one's own revisions automatically marked as "accepted" (autoreview) Mark revisions as being "accepted" (review) Mark others' edits as patrolled...
Click to read more »(talk) 03:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC) Propose renaming Category:Wikipedia autoreview feature to Category:Wikipedia autopatrolled feature Nominator's rationale:...
Click to read more »says Have one's own revisions automatically marked as "accepted" (autoreview), but it's unclear if this applies just to Pending Changes Level 1, or...
Click to read more »Special:ListGroupRights: "Have one's own revisions automatically marked as 'accepted' (autoreview)". jcgoble3 (talk) 05:27, 12 December 2012 (UTC) Thanks! Hmm... doesn't...
Click to read more »follows: Create an "otrs-userright" on enwiki as well, that applies "autoreview" (same as what reviewers have to mark edits to pages under PC as reviewed...
Click to read more »(implied) autoconfirmed Edit semi-protected pages Yes Yes (implied) (implied) autoreview Have one's own edits automatically marked as "accepted" Yes Yes (implied)...
Click to read more »here and for a bot are bot, ipblock-exempt, autoconfirmed, autopatrol, autoreview, noratelimit, suppressredirect, nominornewtalk, skipcaptcha, apihighlimits...
Click to read more »(talk) 10:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC) This new user group is supposed to have 'autoreview' right? Ruslik (talk) 20:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC) In the flaggedrevs proposal...
Click to read more »// semi-protection level on 'arwiki' => array( '', 'autoconfirmed', 'autoreview', 'sysop' ), // bug 52109 'ckbwiki' => array( '', 'autoconfirmed', 'autopatrol'...
Click to read more »collectionsaveascommunitypage,autoconfirmed,editsemiprotected,movestable,autoreview,transcode-reset,skipcaptcha,flow-edit-post,mwoauthproposeconsumer...
Click to read more »autopatrol Automatically mark all edits made by the user as patrolled AP, GR autoreview Automatically mark all revisions made by the user as "accepted" PCR bigdelete...
Click to read more »being editable? I'm proposing that editsemiprotected, autoconfirmed, and autoreview be bundled with the extended confirmed user group. (and possibly the template...
Click to read more »· spi · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) I already have autoreview and rollback rights and have been on Wikipedia for 5 yrs, frequently reverting...
Click to read more »semi-protected $wgFlagRestrictions = array( 'status' => array( 'review' => 1, 'autoreview' => 1 ), ); # Restriction levels for auto-review/review rights...
Click to read more »since it already has admin rights). Should it do this for "move" and "autoreview" (pending changes) actions in addition to "edit"? Cyberbot II used to...
Click to read more »even have the autoreview right, so its reversion proves nothing. As for the defunct Autoreviewer group, that is different from the autoreview right. Anomie⚔...
Click to read more »experience, but I have a simple idea for a bot that will be able to churn out autoreview requests much faster than I can: Go through a list of editors with high...
Click to read more »the candidate is nice to me, has never been blocked, has rollback, has autoreview, has over 50,000 edits, and has earned User:SMcCandlish#Wikawards. Sincerely...
Click to read more »any neutrals!); 2) user was trusted with rollback, account creator, and autoreview rights; 3) user is experienced with over 7,000 edits; 4) user is helpful...
Click to read more »org/reference/Bimmer-Beemer.aspx (270, 37, 1, 1) www.bangkokpost.com/auto/autoreview/24915/no-toupees-allowed (270, 3307, 1, -3) catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/3913069...
Click to read more »she is just confusing the Reviewer right (which Ks0stm has) with the Autoreview/Autopatrolled right (which he does not.) 28bytes (talk) 15:13, 8 September...
Click to read more »to have a single one deleted yet. Without requesting them, I was given Autoreview rights by an Admin I'd never encountered before, merely because he'd been...
Click to read more »contribs) to meta:Toolserver/New accounts (diff). Links: rupp.de/cgi-bin/WP-autoreview.pl de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benutzer_Diskussion:Rupp...
Click to read more »taste. Kind regards. --Mcginnly | Natter 16:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC) Autoreview by Andyz Script The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic...
Click to read more »was unsuccessful. While there, I realized that confirmed users lack the autoreview and movestable permissions that are associated with autoconfirmed. Is...
Click to read more »(autopatrol) Have one's own revisions automatically marked as "accepted" (autoreview) Import pages from other wikis (import) Manage Education Program courses...
Click to read more »that it only works for autoconfirmed users, since you would need the (autoreview) flag to have your changes automatically accepted by the software. Mz7...
Click to read more »Article (Edit|History) • Article talk (Edit|History) • Watch article • Watch peer review This peer review discussion has been closed. Hoping to give this...
Click to read more »under PC3 than under TP. So what you're suggesting is like a PC3 without autoreview? This would need development (and consensus beforehand, to motivate such...
Click to read more »appreciate you sourcing them now. In my view, having the autopatrolled/autoreview flag carries a responsibility not to create articles that, if a new editor...
Click to read more »including high-quality article work and sufficient WP edits, great Userboxen, autoreview rights, has a Barnstar, prolific article creator, etc. Recently came of...
Click to read more »cn, an3) (assign permissions) My content work isn't a problem. I have autoreview and rollback sts and would like to be able to use review sts as well so...
Click to read more »ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions) Experienced editor with rollback and autoreview tools already. shoy (reactions) 20:12, 14 June 2010 (UTC) Done –xenotalk...
Click to read more »and my deProdding that article. Giving him anti-vandalism tools and autoreview rights would be great, but please do not go crazy with the "delete" button...
Click to read more »lan=en&id=48 (199, 18, 1, 1) www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/automobiles/autoreviews/29AUTO.html&pagewanted=all (199, 133289, 0, 0) www.detnews...
Click to read more »certainly will be. Anonymous Dissident Utter 02:45, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Autoreview by mcginnly The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic...
Click to read more »with no third-party references. The whole point of the autopatrolled/autoreview flag, in my opinion, is that editors are trusted to perform new page patrol...
Click to read more »Article (Edit|History) • Article talk (Edit|History) • Watch article • Watch peer review Next in-line for the Ipswich Town drive for featured topic, I'd...
Click to read more »although it has some support. I suggested SPS exception or some sort of autoreview process. DG (and Amigao) want it all gone pronto. No front runner yet...
Click to read more »/100322033/ratings_jdpower.html (136, 1941, 0, 0) www.nola.com/autos/autoreviews/archive.ssf?lexusls430_06.html (136, 2796, 1, -3) www.lexus...
Click to read more »Article (Edit|History) • Article talk (Edit|History) • Watch article • Watch peer review This peer review discussion has been closed. Following the last...
Click to read more »(autoconfirmed) Have one's own revisions automatically marked as "accepted" (autoreview) Mark others' edits as patrolled (patrol) Move pages (move) Move pages...
Click to read more »summarised and referenced. best regards. Anlace 15:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC) Autoreview from AndyZ script The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic...
Click to read more »secondary sources suggests that we should also consider revoking his autoreview privileges. — Bdb484 (talk) 22:18, 11 January 2010 (UTC) We're probably...
Click to read more »<noinclude>{{pp-template|expiry=00:00 1 January 1970}}</noinclude> {{pp|action=autoreview}} → {{pp-pc1|expiry=00:00 1 January 1970}} on template page: {{pp-semi}}...
Click to read more »and reviewers Template editors and reviewers Administrators Of course, autoreview will have auto-accept perms regardless of these settings, and review will...
Click to read more »$wgGroupPermissions['sysop']['validate'] = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysop']['autoreview'] = true; $wgGroupPermissions['sysop']['unreviewedpages'] = true;...
Click to read more »Montenegrin. I didn´t reverted those edits, what shall I do, since I have the autoreview right for some of the articles? FkpCascais (talk) 23:49, 14 January 2010...
Click to read more »If I edit the last section of Talk:Apollo_program_missing_tapes, it shows a paragraph that was added a few hours ago ("truth be told...") but it does not...
Click to read more »certainly will be. Anonymous Dissident Utter 02:45, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Autoreview by mcginnly The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic...
Click to read more »This page contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, have become...
Click to read more »lan=en&id=48 (199, 22, 1, 1) www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/automobiles/autoreviews/29AUTO.html&pagewanted=all (199, 209264, 0, 0) www.detnews...
Click to read more »MediaWiki:revreview-visibility3 MediaWiki:Revreview-visibility3 MediaWiki:right-autoreview Have one's own revisions automatically marked as "accepted" MediaWiki:right-movestable...
Click to read more »January 21 Category:Wikimedia Nepal delete. January 11 Category:Wikipedia autoreview feature rename January 5 Category:Wikipedia expand-section box with explanation...
Click to read more »MediaWiki:revreview-visibility3 MediaWiki:Revreview-visibility3 MediaWiki:right-autoreview Have one's own revisions automatically marked as "accepted" MediaWiki:right-movestable...
Click to read more »(sa) Daniel Case Zunaid Ahmed Palak added pending changes protection (autoreview=autoconfirmed, expires 02:11, 11 January 2026) per RFPP; will also log...
Click to read more »Daniel Case Theories of Pashtun origin added pending changes protection (autoreview=autoconfirmed, expires indefinite) what was requested; will log at CTOPS...
Click to read more »Persons (blp) Rsjaffe Martine Rothblatt added pending changes protection (autoreview=autoconfirmed, expires 03:10, 10 September 2026) Persistent disruptive...
Click to read more »(blp) The Bushranger Ashvir Singh Johal added pending changes protection (autoreview=autoconfirmed, expires indefinite) Persistent disruptive editing - long-term...
Click to read more »Bushranger María Antonieta de las Nieves added pending changes protection (autoreview=autoconfirmed, expires 04:41, 02 December 2026) Persistent disruptive...
Click to read more »States Department of Homeland Security added pending changes protection (autoreview=autoconfirmed, expires indefinite) Persistent disruptive editing - WP:CT/AP;...
Click to read more »Persons (blp) Daniel Case Leonardo Neiva added pending changes protection (autoreview=autoconfirmed, expires indefinite) Violations of the biographies of living...
Click to read more »Daniel Case Drake–Kendrick Lamar feud added pending changes protection (autoreview=autoconfirmed, expires 18:10, 06 October 2025) Violations of the biographies...
Click to read more »sexuality (gg) Daniel Case LGBTQ people added pending changes protection (autoreview=autoconfirmed, expires indefinite) Persistent vandalism: per RFPP; will...
Click to read more »monitoring deletions and something monitoring review status, which could be autoreview, NPP review through the toolset, or other possibilities. What Is less...
Click to read more »United States presidential election added pending changes protection (autoreview=autoconfirmed, expires indefinite) Persistent disruptive editing - WP:CT/AP;...
Click to read more »right now.) I kind of wish we had pending changes settings that only autoreview for ECP. Awesome Aasim 17:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC) And if you cannot do...
Click to read more »Rsjaffe Prince George, Duke of Kent added pending changes protection (autoreview=autoconfirmed, expires indefinite) Violations of the biographies of living...
Click to read more »(ap) Ahecht Statue of George Floyd added pending changes protection (autoreview=autoconfirmed, expires indefinite) Persistent disruptive editing, WP:CTOP...
Click to read more »(ap) Curbon7 Jennifer Siebel Newsom added pending changes protection (autoreview=autoconfirmed, expires 01:54, 12 September 2026) Persistent disruptive...
Click to read more »Persons (blp) Daniel Case Shaggy (musician) changed pending changes level (autoreview=autoconfirmed, expires 18:04, 19 August 2026) Violations of the biographies...
Click to read more »