This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
independent of the company or product (e.g. For Dummies). Shortcuts WP:AUDWP:AUD WP:LOCALCORPWP:LOCALCORP The source's audience must also be considered. Significant...
Click to read more »aud.edu: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en...
Click to read more »aud.edu: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en...
Click to read more »MarketWatch) satisfy WP:AUD. See my comment above for more information. All available sources do not have to satisfy AUD for AUD to be met. North America1000...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable, per WP:AUD. Seems to be of only local interest: refs are specialist or local refs, from...
Click to read more »WP:NSCHOOL. While the sourcing here would indeed fail NORG (particularly WP:AUD), the in-depth local press coverage is enough for GNG purposes. Extraordinary...
Click to read more »advocate: the page could be said not to pass WP:AUD because the coverage is all "local". However, WP:AUD is a garbage guideline that should be ignored -...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP: NCORP. In particular, fails WP:AUD because all sources are niche aviation industry publications. My own searching...
Click to read more », [2], [3]), but I'm not finding non-WP:ROUTINE coverage that clears WP:AUD requirements. Tagged for notability for over a decade. AleatoryPonderings...
Click to read more »org/faq/mp1-aud/mp1-aud.htm (157, 152, 146, 1) mpeg.chiariglione.org/technologies/mpeg-1/mp01-aud/index.htm (157, 152, 146, 1) mpeg.chiariglione.org/faq/mp1-aud/mp1-aud...
Click to read more »abbreviation AUD$ as AUD in the ISO 4217 standard already means "Australian dollar" which would make AUD$ redundant ("Australian dollar dollar"). The {{AUD}} template...
Click to read more »restaurant was open. The coverage is mostly local press which does not meet WP:AUD. A place of local notability, and that's it. Not sufficient to meet GNG....
Click to read more »content that is clearly independent This also fails AUD This - refer to first source This is another AUD failure and broadly another example of trivial coverage...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NORG, specifically does not meet WP:AUD since coverage in reliable sources is exclusively local. Previous discussion...
Click to read more »this page. The result was keep. Consensus is that when accounting for WP:AUD, the sources in the article are significant enough to meet GNG. (non-admin...
Click to read more »meet WP:CORP - coverage is limited in scope or in specialist sources (WP:AUD). SmartSE (talk) 16:00, 23 October 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »necessarily biased, but they're not very useful for judging notability. See WP:AUD. Vanamonde (talk) 06:35, 25 December 2018 (UTC) So this is only an urban...
Click to read more »Chronicle. (WP:AUD: Based in Georgia) "Tasters' choice: Willamette Valley Vineyards, Wild Horse wines - Wine Novice". The Sun. May 24, 2012. (WP:AUD: Based in...
Click to read more »TWL) Now closed restaurant that fails GNG. Coverage is all local as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 23:46, 20 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete, per WP:AUD. BD2412 T 18:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...
Click to read more »fails WP:AUD a significant component of NCORP. SK2242 (talk) 18:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC) Agreed the Commercial Motor + local newspapers fails WP:AUD Devokewater...
Click to read more »to Wikipedia:AUD, "at least one regional, national, or international source is necessary". So I believe the article complies with WP:AUD and WP:42. Also...
Click to read more »on the actual proposal and won't watch this discussion. According to WP:AUD, "Attention solely from local media (e.g., the weekly newspaper for a small...
Click to read more »WP:NCORP. All coverage is local and primarily routine announcements so fails WP:AUD and WP:CORPDEPTH. No in-depth NCORP-compliant coverage located on a search...
Click to read more »nature is no pass on WP:AUD for the purpose of establishing notability under WP:NORG. Graywalls (talk) 07:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC) WP:AUD says: The source's...
Click to read more »here, and here. It may be enough to be notable, not sure if it passes WP:AUD though --Tristario (talk) 00:07, 28 November 2022 (UTC) Keep. WP:GNG is met...
Click to read more »description. The other 22 sources combined easily pass WP:ORG, including WP:AUD. If there are inappropriate promotional statements, they should be trimmed...
Click to read more »written are Offentlighet (Public sphere), Offentlig rom (Public space), Aud Richter (Aud Richter) and Drammensbiblioteket (Drammen library). Wikipedia:Statistikk...
Click to read more »WP:AUD which says "attention solely from local media...is not an indication of notability" - Epinoia (talk) 03:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC) WP:AUD refers...
Click to read more »that only existed for 7 months. Fails GNG, coverage is only local as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 03:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Open-AudIT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »something pieces that fail WP:AUD and an article that doesn't appear to mention the company - overall no coverage meeting WP:AUD and WP:CORPDEPTH for meeting...
Click to read more »rought consensus to Keep. I recommend an policy talk page discussion on WP:AUD about regional vs. local coverage as it seems to be an issue that has come...
Click to read more »provincial, national, or international source is necessary" thing in WP:AUD wouldn't be a thing. It's not on me that you disagree with it and have some...
Click to read more »some routine local coverage of when they played in local venues [1], but WP:AUD applies. Albums release on a non-notable label is not enough for notability...
Click to read more »is available, use the following syntax (adding "AUD" and the filename): '''Bydgoszcz''' {{IPAc-pl|AUD|Pl-Bydgoszcz.ogg|'|b|y|d|g|o|sz|cz}} produces Bydgoszcz...
Click to read more »mentions." Thanks - Chetsford (talk) 14:55, 20 May 2021 (UTC) WP:NORG has an WP:AUD requirement. Two local articles on the club clearly don't demonstrate notability...
Click to read more »app used by the National University of Singapore. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:AUD, WP:ORGIND. I cannot see the notability of an application used by the students...
Click to read more »WP:NORG. All sources are either primary (press-releases) or come from WP:AUD sources (city/county level). Likewise, they have a bunch of awards, but they...
Click to read more »nothing from outside the region, meaning that the sourcing falls short of WP:AUD. It's likely that Tyree himself is notable, but the sourcing just isn't there...
Click to read more »the San Pedro Sun, but that is a local newspaper that doesn't meet the WP:AUD requirement. There are also some quick references to Moncho's in tourists'...
Click to read more »WW WP:AUD WP:SIGCOV Rushall (free lance local writer) / WW (I spent a night...): WP:AUD PSU Vanguard: very local, very limited audience. WP:AUD PQ Monthly:...
Click to read more »that only gets local coverage/reviews. Would need wider coverage as per WP:AUD to meet GNG or WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 03:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC) Keep per...
Click to read more »There is some good coverage of this organization in local papers, but WP:AUD is still a concern. I think coverage such as this from The Oregonian is enough...
Click to read more »criteria which is part of NCORP - such as AUD. SK2242 (talk) 14:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC) SK2242, on AUD, please see above. Moonraker (talk) 14:54,...
Click to read more »references in the article are 404 links, and even if they weren't would be WP:AUD fails as they are either only local coverage (i.e., they are purely city...
Click to read more »least in my opinion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC) WP:AUD is a WP:CORP guideline. WP:CORP explicitly excludes groups covered by other...
Click to read more »August 2020 (UTC) These are local sources, see WP:AUD--Rusf10 (talk) 00:29, 18 August 2020 (UTC) WP:AUD says "at least one regional, statewide, provincial...
Click to read more »difficult to find a regional source because the name is so generic. Per WP:AUD, public schools need only one regional or national reference. The references...
Click to read more »September 2016 (UTC) Delete -- coverage presented above does not meet WP:AUD and is strictly local and run-of-the-mill: "local company does well", not...
Click to read more »promotional content from the article. All the refs are local papers, so WP:AUD is relevant here. The refs from the local paper do provide in-depth coverage...
Click to read more »standards. which I agree with. Only independent coverage is local - per WP:AUD is insufficient. The Basketball League is a possible redirect target. power~enwiki...
Click to read more »is some press, it is all from the Houston area, which means it fails WP:AUD. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:47, 6 July 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »no consensus per sources presented by Northamerica1000 appear to pass WP:AUD. The strongest sources presented are Oxford University Press and The News...
Click to read more »cars in a book by a no-name publisher that you can pick up for AUD$ 2.50, marked down to AUD$ 1.00 at a cheap books stall in the Indro Shopping Town? Delete...
Click to read more »on the actual proposal and won't watch this discussion. According to WP:AUD, "Attention solely from local media (e.g., the weekly newspaper for a small...
Click to read more »earlier, but could not remember where it was. The relevant policy is WP:AUD, part of the notability requirement for firms, which says "attention solely...
Click to read more »Meets the GNG per a source review, and also meets WP:AUD having received national-level coverage (AUD examples: [1], [2], [3], [4] [3 ¶]. North America1000...
Click to read more »before we had WP:AUD (as far as I know) as a barometer of greater-than-local coverage. Anyway, it is on that basis -- failing WP:AUD -- that I renominate...
Click to read more »WP:AUD. Some of those contextless link drops in the page are about the founder, but not so much on the organization. The NBC Los Angeles lacks WP:AUD as...
Click to read more »delete the article per WP:AUD. Thanks for stopping by! —Unforgettableid (talk) 04:25, 19 February 2014 (UTC) Keep - Passes WP:AUD per Hoovers. The who, why...
Click to read more »documentary. I wonder: A) Does the TV documentary qualify as "non-local" per WP:AUD? B) WP:GNG says: "There is no fixed number of sources required since sources...
Click to read more »WP:ORGDEPTH per a review of available sources. The topic also passes WP:AUD, having received coverage in national news sources, such as Associated Press...
Click to read more »Spider) 22:40, 8 March 2021 (UTC) This is a local source, so it fails WP:AUD. Mottezen (talk) 22:43, 8 March 2021 (UTC) Keep as challenger of the soft...
Click to read more »notability. Ajf773 (talk) 19:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC) Delete. Fails the WP:AUD part of WP:NCORP, and potentially WP:NOTTRAVEL. SportingFlyer T·C 20:35,...
Click to read more »public usage. This is going to prevent that. It can be merged into the audism entry, but please don't delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by...
Click to read more »you added and, I'm sorry to say, they don't affect my opinion too much. WP:AUD says that attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest...
Click to read more »de L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:03, 17 May 2018 (UTC) Delete- doesn't clear WP:AUD requirement of WP:ORG--Rusf10 (talk) 14:46, 18 May 2018 (UTC) Keep Under...
Click to read more »fails WP:AUD and more fails WP:ORGIND as its a PR piece that involved the whole staff. It is not independent. Ref 2 [12] Non-rs. Fails WP:AUD and WP:SIRS...
Click to read more »local and in-depth reporting." So that would only count as a local per WP:AUD Graywalls (talk) 20:18, 13 September 2020 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »lot of problems with it. Esw01407 (talk) 20:00, 5 June 2020 (UTC) Ehhh, WP:AUD (part of NORG) leans away from using local sources. --Izno (talk) 20:47,...
Click to read more »more than "Company closed down" it still fails AUD per above. The Oldham source while also failing AUD is trivial coverage as described in NCORP - "a...
Click to read more »is entirely local and some of them are in sources which may not pass WP:AUD. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:10, 17 October 2016 (UTC) Keep Pioneers Press has...
Click to read more »regional and more than AUD requires. By citing AUD you're actually strengthening the case for keeping. If you'd like to change WP:AUD to exclude regional...
Click to read more »Fails WP:NCORP. Local coverage only. Would need wider coverage to meet WP:AUD. Fails WP:SIRS. scope_creepTalk 17:54, 9 July 2023 (UTC) Strong keep. IMO...
Click to read more »( talk ) 06:30, 26 December 2013 (UTC) Oppose. Meets WP:ORG and WP:AUD. Per WP:AUD: Evidence of attention by international or national, or at least regional...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:17, 20 November 2023 (UTC) Keep: had AUD meeting coverage in the book Shooting Star: The Definitive Story of Elliott...
Click to read more »me if I’m wrong. The bit in there that would help the delete case is WP:AUD, which requires coverage in one non-regional source. Looking carefully, bizjournals...
Click to read more »detail. There is one review in a local publication, but this doesn't pass WP:AUD - the fact this review claims the cafe is a local landmark isn't sufficient...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:02, 3 June 2021 (UTC) That's just local press coverage. Per WP:AUD, "attention solely from local media...is not an indication of notability...
Click to read more »count towards notability please? CT55555 (talk) 21:21, 30 May 2022 (UTC) WP:AUD discusses local-only coverage. It's difficult for sources like the NYT, which...
Click to read more »either local or gay interest magazines. Local sources do not satisfy WP:AUD and gay interest magazines would also be "media of limited interest" under...
Click to read more »the museum still seems to be extant. I think it meets WP:GNG but fails WP:AUD, for local only coverage. That could be the reef upon which it founders....
Click to read more »December 2021 (UTC) @Dialectric I don't think AUD is an issue if The EaterSF is considered regional (as in AUD says "at least one"), and I think that the...
Click to read more »discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:AUD. There's some coveranage from Lincoln, NE [1][2][3] but nothing else. Mach61...
Click to read more »it doesn't make it notable. As an organization schools have to meet WP:AUD--Rusf10 (talk) 16:52, 2 May 2021 (UTC) Rusf10, uour assertion thst schools...
Click to read more »roller hockey popularity when it was on prime time ESPN which easily meets WP:AUD. WP:SPORTCRIT is about players, not leagues or teams. -DJSasso (talk) 19:16...
Click to read more »and provides addresses and contact information for breweries. Keeping WP:AUD in mind for the English Wikipedia, I again question the notability of a small...
Click to read more »TWL) A closed restaurant that only gets coverage in local media as per WP:AUD and fails GNG. There is in fact a restaurant of the same name in New Jersey...
Click to read more »CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:11, 12 January 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:PRODUCTREV and WP:AUD (and as article creator, sure). Mama Lu's Dumpling House#References has multiple...
Click to read more »source for the purposes of establishing notability, and second, it fails WP:AUD as all the publications are local to the subject and therefore do not indicate...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails the WP:AUD requirement of WP:ORG since all sources are local. A truly notable organization...
Click to read more »based on 2 reviews of publications in the same city is not notable as per WP:AUD. Otherwise we'd be creating articles for every restaurant locally reviewed...
Click to read more »meet WP:AUD. https://apparelmagazine.co.nz/blog/charles-parsons-acquires-eclipse-textiles/ - news, not much about the company, and again WP:AUD. https://www...
Click to read more »anyway. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Please see WP:AUD on the Notability for Organizations guideline for local/regional orgs. This...
Click to read more »1946 Harbours Act 1996 Harbours Act Naomhóg Curragh/Currach Galway Hooker Aud Saint Brendan Jeanie Johnston Asgard Asgard II Dunbrody Helga/LÉ Muirchú...
Click to read more »local news story, so not providing significant coverage according to WP:AUD. Also the article is mainly about the hospital and the dogs, with the charity...
Click to read more »23 December 2024 (UTC) Comment. The nominator seems to be hinting at WP:AUD with the statement about coverage in its local municipality, which specifies...
Click to read more »arguing for deletion. While Northamerica1000 is correct when they say WP:AUD does not require certain kind of supra-local coverage and that "local" does...
Click to read more »subject is of exclusively local interest and significance. Currently WP:AUD does not allow articles that have no national-level sources, though I see...
Click to read more »the closest in terms of WP:SIGCOV, but then there's WP:AUD to consider and even ignoring WP:AUD we still need coverage in different publications. Such...
Click to read more »critical acclaim on a national level are not run of the mill as per WP:AUD: WP:AUD appears to allow significant coverage from regional reliable sources...
Click to read more »(UTC) Yes indeed. Locality is not part of WP:N. Scope may be thinking of WP:AUD or WP:GEOSCOPE. The former applies to organisations and adding it in for...
Click to read more »significant coverage, then don't the WP:AUD objections to the aviation-press references raised in the last AFD fall away? WP:AUD requires that at least one instance...
Click to read more »rationale "Local and "routine" coverage can be used; WP:AUD only applies to organizations," although AUD was not an element of the prod. Ravenswing 00:15, 29...
Click to read more »Did you? Local newspapers do not meet WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 03:34, 30 November 2024 (UTC) @LibStar, first, AUD only requires one (1) non-local newspaper...
Click to read more »been added here thus far, is usually not permitted for organizations per WP:AUD. Let'srun (talk) 18:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...
Click to read more »has no coverage in that language's market isn't promotional. Moreover, WP:AUD, part of WP:ORG, says that we need to consider the audience when considering...
Click to read more »Does not meet WP:AUD, it has not been covered by sources outside of Philadelphia.--Rusf10 (talk) 16:03, 10 August 2020 (UTC) WP:AUD says "at least one...
Click to read more »fails WP:CORP. There's coverage in strictly local sources, but this fails WP:AUD for lacking significant coverage in reliable sources outside the DC area...
Click to read more »considering the topic under GNG and AUD. AUD knocks out the other limited-audience refs from satisfying GNG. And, in addition, AUD says we need at least one ref...
Click to read more »actions can I take for this article to be accepted? AudLegasse (talk) 12:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC) AudLegasse (talk) 12:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC) I looked...
Click to read more »for this local organisation is not good for WP:AUD. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:27, 13 January 2025 (UTC) AUD does not apply to sports teams. BeanieFan11 (talk)...
Click to read more »interview (fails WP:ORGIND) and a story in a local business paper (fails WP:AUD), and I don't think KANAVA is an RS. ~ A412 talk! 00:44, 24 January 2024...
Click to read more »2025 (UTC) If the sources are so geographically limited would it meet WP:AUD? Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:15, 7 June 2025 (UTC) It had a few short pieces distributed...
Click to read more »delete; where there is policy-based disagreement (in this case about WP:AUD), numerical tilt comes into play. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:18, 4 September 2023...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORG. Coverage is mainly local and not wider as per WP:AUD. Only one article links to this. LibStar (talk) 01:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »are only two sources both of them local. This is an organization, so WP:AUD is applicable here, but even under WP:GNG, two sources is not enough. Why...
Click to read more »not require regional or national sources, but a requirement of ORG is WP:AUD. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 00:12, 22 April 2021 (UTC) Hold on. I think I was...
Click to read more »full aud.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by OperaJoeGreen (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). File:Vance Marune 02 aud.jpg...
Click to read more »bars, but not all of them seem to be really notable. This one fails the WP:AUD (audience) test, as the sources are all local, and most of them not very...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) It appears that the subject is non-notable due to WP:AUD. "Well," you might argue, "we should merge this article into the article...
Click to read more »susceptibility of companies/organizations article to public relations editing. WP:AUD specifically calls that at least one of the sources providing significant...
Click to read more »North America1000 03:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC) Delete – Does not meet WP:AUD. The company has received local coverage, but source searches are only providing...
Click to read more »18:59, 22 August 2019 (UTC) Delete as there are no non-local sources, per WP:AUD — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sam-2727 (talk • contribs) 01:28, 24...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORP. Coverage is only local as per WP:AUD. Created by a single purpose editor so possible WP:PROMO. LibStar (talk)...
Click to read more »in-depth coverage of the school, and they're all local news anyway (see WP:AUD). AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 01:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC) I don't think...
Click to read more »significant coverage. The coverage provided includes local newspapers, as per WP:AUD, wider coverage is required. LibStar (talk) 23:36, 27 November 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »independent, reliable sourcesWP:ORGIND and WP:ORGDEPTH with adequate readership WP:AUD Graywalls (talk) 20:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC) Keep meets WP:ORG. WaPo has...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP. The Per WP:AUD, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation...
Click to read more »Chicago media back in 2012, but not really anything significant, and WP:AUD applies anyways. -Apocheir (talk) 03:16, 6 May 2022 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »articles), and a paragraph in the NYT, but not enough to satisfactorily pass WP:AUD. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 11:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC) Keep - Here's the...
Click to read more »I found in a gnews search is local Seattle coverage. Fails GNG due to WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 03:43, 14 July 2023 (UTC) Please stop targeting me. ---Another...
Click to read more »closed restaurant that fails GNG. Coverage is almost all local as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 23:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »criteria to be met is WP:AUD. None of the sources you referenced meet AUD. At least one must, but preferably multiple sources meet WP:AUD and WP:SIGCOV together...
Click to read more »affiliate. schetm (talk) 22:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC) I do not believe that WP:AUD applies to churches and other such historic buildings. Cbl62 (talk) 23:10...
Click to read more »of the sources you found are local and we need wider coverage as per WP:AUD. I would caution using youtube as a source as per Wikipedia:Reliable_sou...
Click to read more »independent, third-party coverage in reliable sources amounts to none. Fails WP:AUD, WP:ORGIND and WP:ORGDEPTH. — fortunavelut luna 11:33, 31 August 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »in 2013) but it never received any attention outside of local news, so WP:AUD applies. GBooks doesn't turn up anything helpful, and neither do GNews and...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No coverage outside of local news (see WP:AUD) - fails WP:NCORP. SK2242 (talk) 23:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC) do you know @BeanieFan11 whether WP:AUD relates to Biographies as well as N:ORG. While Ohio State has a national...
Click to read more »line launch, sale, change, or discontinuance" Both sources also fail WP:AUD for being only of local reach. I could not find sources that meet the NCORP...
Click to read more »Ganesha811 (talk) 04:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC) Keep. The article passes WP:AUD, which states that at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national...
Click to read more »trivial), [2], [3], [4], [5]/[6], [7], [8]. I know these have a local WP:AUD but as the world's second largest maker of gummy bears and the largest non-chocolate...
Click to read more »which does not suggest encyclopedic notability per WP:AUD. --Kinu t/c 06:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC) WP:AUD is for companies and organisations not people, Atlantic306...
Click to read more »Fails WP:NOTNEWS. Most of the sources are local media, so fails WP:AUD (yes, I know AUD is listed under WP:NCORP, but the same logic applies here) and WP:MILL...
Click to read more »chiariglione.org/technologies/mpeg-2/mp02-aud/index.htm (157, 167, 146, 1) mpeg.chiariglione.org/faq/mp1-aud/mp1-aud.htm (157, 167, 146, 1) 2010-02-09 15:23:34...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per source searches, does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:AUD. North America1000 02:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »September 2022 (UTC) In my opinion the coverage of the school falls foul of WP:AUD ... "attention solely from local media ... is not an indication of notability...
Click to read more »holidays! Babymissfortune 14:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:AUD if nothing else - no sources outside of colorado. Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:46...
Click to read more »coverage passes WP:AUD here. Allan Nonymous (talk) 04:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC) Aren't sports teams exempt from WP:ORG (and thus exempt from AUD)? The second sentence...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Only routine coverage and listings like Inc 5000, and WP:AUD and WP:ORGIND failing interviews, bizjournal coverage, and such. Nothing...
Click to read more »WP:MILL. -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:06, 10 June 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:AUD. I tried to expand the article, but reliable, non-trivial, non-local sources...
Click to read more »Nevada-based firm. But it doesn't seem to meet WP:COMPANY or more specifically WP:AUD just yet. Most of the coverage of the Lopiccolos and their firm appears to...
Click to read more »that very limited scope. If it had been incorporated by analogy with WP:AUD it would be the narrow circulation of the newspaper, not whether the person...
Click to read more »and other industry coverage is also not independent and doesn't meet WP:AUD. I'm not seeing any sources that meet GNG, or anything else supporting NAUTHOR...
Click to read more »WP:CORPDEPTH per a review of available sources. The company also passes WP:AUD because it has received national news coverage, and furthermore, such coverage...
Click to read more »coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Per WP:AUD, "attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation...
Click to read more »coffman (talk) 00:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC) Delete -- sources do not meet WP:AUD and WP:CORPDEPTH; just an unremarkable travel agency going about its business...
Click to read more »the last AfD someone argued that the article passes WP:NORG. However, WP:AUD, which is part of NORG, states that attention solely from local media (e...
Click to read more »(RAIC) and the AIA Canada Society—meets WP:AUD. However, Save Max Sports Centre is not required to meet WP:AUD. Save Max Sports Centre is a building. The...
Click to read more »if independent sources could be found, they'd still be local and fail WP:AUD. -- Netoholic @ 07:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:AUD. While I considered merge into Robert Duncan as altenative to deletion, it...
Click to read more »multiple significant coverage sources, of which at least one should meet WP:AUD requirements. SK2242 (talk) 13:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »law firm. Other coverage is in Rochester, New York–area press so fails WP:AUD. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »there are two independent sources, it is not clear whether they satisfy WP:AUD or if they are too limited in audience (one being local and the other a specialized...
Click to read more »person who wrote WP:AUD ~17 years ago, Rollinginhisgrave has the correct interpretation. Anyone who wants to learn more about AUD may find Wikipedia:Notability...
Click to read more »(WP:AUD). The thing is, a populated place like Winterbury is not an organization / company. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC) WP:AUD might...
Click to read more »North America1000 20:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC) Keep – Meets WP:GNG and WP:AUD, and was formerly a Michelin-starred restaurant. See source examples below;...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:AUD I included an article from the The Oregonian which is a statewide publication; with the addition of this it should appease Wikipedia:AUD.Alecpalm...
Click to read more »doesn't matter, since non-profits are not required to meet WP:NORG or WP:AUD. Here's the WP:GNG description of the notability requirement for significant...
Click to read more »68, 66, 1) currate.com/ (75, 68, 66, 1) currate.com/basic.php?amt=1&from=aud&to= (75, 68, 66, 1) currate.com/basic.php?amt=1&from=cad&to= (75, 68, 66...
Click to read more »are purely what the company's people say about themselves, and fail WP:AUD Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »could find. Given the extreme narrowness of their audience, I feel like WP:AUD is important here: "attention solely from local media, or media of limited...
Click to read more »sources with narrow audiences, such as TechCrunch and Network World (WP:AUD). No national media could be found other than short articles about a fundraising...
Click to read more »SIGCOV source outside of local/specialist publications then it fails WP:AUD, a component of NCORP. SK2242 (talk) 13:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited. WP:AUD also states that significant coverage by international or national, or at...
Click to read more »Further, it seems odd that this page is receiving objection if WP:AUD is considered. WP:AUD states: “The source's audience must also be considered. Evidence...
Click to read more »promotional puff-piece; fails WP:ORG- only limited local references, fails WP:AUD. — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 12:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »because of one self ref. Fails WP:CORP, WP:CORPDEPTH no WP:SIGCOV and WP:AUD. No even mention in any reliable sources. Ammarpad (talk) 16:33, 28 October...
Click to read more »funding, and its board of directors—then it seems to fail notability under WP:AUD: "[A]ttention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's general notability guidelines and WP:NORG. Coverage fails WP:AUD. JbhTalk 00:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Ahem Jbhunley, were you aware you voted...
Click to read more »at all, certainly nothing outside the Pittsburgh area (necessary for WP:AUD). We can't hang a whole article on one local-focus magazine. ♠PMC♠ (talk)...
Click to read more »Shooting of Jamal and Muhammad al-Durrah Template:AfC batch warning Template:AUD/testcases Template:Bots/doc Template:CAD/testcases Template:Copyvio Template:DYK...
Click to read more »in paying attention to the instructions toward regional notability at WP:AUD. Yes, the article has issues, but guidelines tells us an organization is...
Click to read more »that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements. Per WP:AUD, the sources include national/regional news outlets such as CNN, the Los...
Click to read more »unreferenced article and a quick search returns only invalid sources per WP:AUD Headphase (talk) 00:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »the criteria for WP:NCORP Graywalls (talk) 22:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC) WP:AUD seems like the most relevant part of that guideline. But Action Wellness...
Click to read more »planning (See: 1 2 3 4 5 6). The Computer World article clears it over any WP:AUD concerns, this is not a BLP article so WP:1E doesn't apply, as such my conclusion...
Click to read more »are a few brief articles in the local press (e.g. [1] and [2]), but per WP:AUD some sort of sigcov from regional/national sources (at minimum) is needed...
Click to read more »([1]), and only newspaper coverage located appears to me local. No wider WP:AUD-compliant coverage located. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:02, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »very brief time (three single bits on WB, basically status updates). WP:AUD might be an issue for both pages' sources. I'm not especially confident either...
Click to read more »the Exeter University Student paper Exepose (perhaps not sufficient for WP:AUD?); "TheNationalStudent.com" whose reputation, audience and reliability is...
Click to read more »piercecountywa.org/pc/abtus/ourorg/aud/Elections/archives/gen06/results.htm (25, 15, 10, 1) www.piercecountywa.org/xml/abtus/ourorg/aud/Elections/Archives/gen06/Amendments2006...
Click to read more »coverage in independent reliable sources beyond a purely local audience WP:AUD. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:43, 14 May 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »Sunčana Glavak Rie de Boois Parbati Kumari Bisunkhe Anna Kochanowska - PIN Aud Blegen Svindland - PIN Alia Abu Tayeh - PIN Angelika Mertens Lara Wolters...
Click to read more »WP:NMEDIA in print and electronic media, and that for Nigeria, this meets WP:AUD notability for a national audience, i.e., his country. Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »itself is definitely newsworthy and there's significant WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:AUD to establish that. In other words, it meets both criteria specified in WP:NGO...
Click to read more »should be leniency when it comes to school boards if they don't meet WP:AUD. Also, per WP:GEOLAND, school districts are inherently notable because they...
Click to read more »WP:ORG currently (some local coverage may exist, but not sufficient per WP:AUD), however a redirect and mention would be suitable. Esquivalience t 22:10...
Click to read more »level of significant coverage of the chamber of commerce itself. Moreover WP:AUD applies here (though I personally don't think it's a good rule) meaning the...
Click to read more »required of WP:NCORP. In particular, the industry-only coverage fails WP:AUD. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:38, 2 October 2018 (UTC) Delete. I opened up six of...
Click to read more »of 0.017 mile between the mileage recorded by this company, 11.884 miles, aud the mileage, 11.867 miles, inventoried as of date of valuation. HISTORY OF...
Click to read more »small town of about 500 people. Only coverage is from the local newspaper.WP:AUD may be an issue here. Rusf10 (talk) 02:02, 3 April 2018 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »discussions. North America1000 01:36, 3 May 2017 (UTC) Keep – Meets WP:GNG and WP:AUD. Below are some source examples. The article would benefit from copy editing...
Click to read more »the org, and lawyers identified as part of it. Found nothing to satisfy WP:AUD, WP:ORGIND and WP:SIGCOV. Mottezen (talk) 18:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »discussions. North America1000 05:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC) Delete. Doesn't pass WP:AUD. No significant coverage other than local nor with secondary sources. Ajf773...
Click to read more »is a local human interest story and WP:TOOSOON. Also WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:AUD is not satisfied. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »think in this case they have a reach that is regional or statewide per WP:AUD since the topic is statewide and these are major sources for statewide news...
Click to read more »Graywalls (talk) 19:18, 1 June 2020 (UTC) reply you may wish to review WP:AUD requirements in WP:NORG All/most of the above are local coverage which do...
Click to read more »of press releases in industry press, thus failing WP:INDEPENDENT and WP:AUD. My own searching failed to find anything better. The editing history of...
Click to read more »campaign in Politico, a domestic-violence campaign in ABC13 (but consider WP:AUD), and Occupy in The Atlantic, Der Spiegel and HuffPost. Gets a general mention...
Click to read more »WP:NOPAY and WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Reason 2: ISTM that this product fails WP:AUD, which says that "attention solely from local media, or media of limited...
Click to read more »Nomination withdrawn. While they arguably may not satisfy WP:NORG (in terms of WP:AUD), User:Jweiss11 has provided sources that show enough notability to meet...
Click to read more »convincing as it does not meet WP:AUD. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC) Keep your vote, but actually read WP:AUD and follow the link there to...
Click to read more »under WP:ORGTRIV, and is aimed at either local or business audiences (WP:AUD). Pink Bee (talk) 20:03, 25 January 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »certainly don't claim to be an expert and am not sure if it applies here, but WP:AUD does exclude local media. Aŭstriano (talk) 14:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC) That...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable restaurant that fails to meet WP:NCORP/WP:AUD notability requirements. DEPRODed by user:Andrew Davidson without any explanation...
Click to read more »let's assume it's legit... the article fails WP:NCORP, and especially WP:AUD, requiring multiple independent, secondary, reliable regional and/or national...
Click to read more »article, most (Dallas Weekly and D Magazine) are purely local and fail WP:AUD. Of the two non-local sources, the first Columbia Journalism Review cite...
Click to read more »exception (not applicable here) is the WP:AUD limitation in WP:NCORP. A proposal in 2019 to extend WP:AUD more broadly to Wikipedia articles was rejected...
Click to read more »significant effect it has had. Fails to meet WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:AUD, and WP:ORG. Worldbruce (talk) 00:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »North America1000 04:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC) Keep – Passes WP:GNG and WP:AUD as per sources in the article. The article does not use promotional language...
Click to read more »roller hockey popularity when it was on prime time ESPN which easily meets WP:AUD. WP:SPORTCRIT is about players, not leagues or teams. -DJSasso (talk) 19:17...
Click to read more »but I'm not sure if that's enough per WP:CORPDEPTH or it it's still too WP:AUD. It probably would be a good idea to post a Template:Please see at Wikipedia...
Click to read more »I'm pretty convinced notability is asserted by the awarding of Australia's AUD$1 billion Coastwatch contract. As for notability, there are some possible...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Local organization that fails the WP:AUD test of notability (organizations and companies). Searches of the usual Google...
Click to read more »[1]), but they suffer from the same shortfalls. Another point is that WP:AUD doesn't seem to be satisfied: the only available sources appear to be "media...
Click to read more »very modest coverage in military blogs and sources with limited audience WP:AUD. There is two Newsweek articles where the CEO is quoted, and other articles...
Click to read more »Columbia. Coverage in reliable sources exists, but it's primarily local (see WP:AUD). NorthAmerica1000 23:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC) I could see a redirect. But...
Click to read more »not sure why when you say "A$60 million (1991 AUD)" you need to specify the year, what other year's AUD would they have been using in 1991? In response...
Click to read more »coverage such as [1], [2], [3], [4], in-depth coverage in local papers (WP:AUD does not apply to people though I sometimes wish it did), etc., etc. GNG...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) All the coverage I could find is local and thus does not meet WP:AUD and fails WP:ORG. The club does not play in the top tier competition in Australia...
Click to read more »significant coverage. Public schools are explicitly excluded from WP:NORG so WP:AUD does not apply. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:22, 29 July 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box]...
Click to read more »source is a human-interest fluff piece from a local ABC affiliate (see WP:AUD for why that's not a great indicator of notability). The rest are blogs,...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP. Per WP:AUD, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation...
Click to read more »independent reliable sources. A local newspaper isn't a reliable source (WP:AUD) so having only this source puts this shopping mall below the threshold of...
Click to read more »(UTC) Strong keep Significant conservation organisation (annual income = AUD$4.88 million per the ACNC website); frequent mentions in national media as...
Click to read more »roller hockey popularity when it was on prime time ESPN which easily meets WP:AUD. WP:SPORTCRIT is about players, not leagues or teams. -DJSasso (talk) 19:16...
Click to read more »13:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:ORG, and particularly its WP:AUD restrictions, something like this would need more than purely local media...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Keep – Meets WP:AUD and WP:GNG. Source examples include, but are not limited to: [1], [2], [3]...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:AUD: "Evidence of significant coverage by international or national, or at least...
Click to read more »coverage mentioned in the article seems to be strictly local, contrary to WP:AUD (although can't confirm because of link rot and improper citing. I don't...
Click to read more »indications of notability. The ones that aren't are hyper-local and fail WP:AUD. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »America1000 05:11, 30 July 2016 (UTC) Keep – Meets WP:ORGDEPTH. Also meets WP:AUD per non-local coverage, such as in BBC News and The Guardian. North America1000...
Click to read more »WP:ORG. No coverage beyond local small-town weekly papers, and thus fails WP:AUD. In examining the three links posted above, the first is a casual mention...
Click to read more »g. #98 in the National Retail Federation 2013 list), which fall under WP:AUD. Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH or wider WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:37, 28 November...
Click to read more »tribute page. Sources used in the article are either local, not meeting WP:AUD, or self-citations, failing WP:SPIP (LinkedIn; company's web site, etc)....
Click to read more »roller hockey popularity when it was on prime time ESPN which easily meets WP:AUD. WP:SPORTCRIT is about players, not leagues or teams. -DJSasso (talk) 19:15...
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) Redirect to Cobb County School District. It seems to fail WP:AUD as the only source[1] I can find, other than incidental mentions of board...
Click to read more »existing essentially as an organization of sorts, this does not meet WP:AUD, at least per Google News and Books searches. North America1000 12:49, 15...
Click to read more »concensus of the community, as it fails WP:CORPDEPTH, but does it meet WP:AUD with significant enough coverage to remain in mainspace? Nick Moyes (talk)...
Click to read more »delete because it fails WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. (I suspect it also fails WP:AUD.) —Unforgettableid (talk) 01:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »was some non-local sources so that it could meet WP:ORG (specifically WP:AUD) by way of WP:NSCHOOL, but as WP:NSCHOOL specifically points out, meeting...
Click to read more »acknowledge your personal preference for "one regional or national story", per WP:AUD. However, that WP:NORG criterion does not apply to non-profit educational...
Click to read more »little in google news. Need wider coverage than local newpapers to meet WP:AUD and WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 23:07, 5 January 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »is a blog. 2nd is not sigcov and third is very local coverage as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 00:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »coverage is local press ie St Louis Post-Dispatch which doesn't meet WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 23:46, 17 December 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »sources: Pasadena Star-News, Pasadena Weekly, OC Register, Dread Central. WP:AUD discounts completely local coverage, but Dread Central is not local. The...
Click to read more »significant, multiple, independent sources in multiple articles of adequate WP:AUD Graywalls (talk) 22:41, 27 April 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...
Click to read more »and a well known phenomena. It likely fails WP:AUD. scope_creepTalk 10:54, 3 October 2024 (UTC) WP:AUD is reserved for companies and organisations, Atlantic306...
Click to read more »discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:16, 4 September 2020 (UTC) Weak delete per WP:AUD. Nearly all the coverage I found was local to Pittsburgh. Delete is weak...
Click to read more »Only 2 google news hits which are local press from Anchorage as per WP:AUD. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 16:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »little town. There are no sources outside of Massachussets, so it fails WP:AUD even if that fluff piece + trivial mentions were enough to squeak it over...
Click to read more »enough to meet GNG - it's true that they are local/semi-national, but WP:AUD only applies to organizations are far as I know. --Cerebellum (talk) 19:21...
Click to read more »to find indepth coverage, especially something outside Seattle as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »even pass it what to consider under WP:ORGCRIT/WP:NCORP/WP:CORPDEPTH/WP:AUD. If you can say something reasonable, I am willing to consider WP:ATD but...
Click to read more »spin-out of another article at AfD which fails WP:NCORP, specifically the WP:AUD prong (as do a lot of Oregon articles, which is why we have more articles...
Click to read more »few or no other edits outside this topic. Delete per WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:AUD. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Onel5969 TT me 13:05, 8 December 2015 (UTC)...
Click to read more »23:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NCORP. All coverage is local (WP:AUD requires coverage in at least one broader-scope publication for NCORP), in...
Click to read more »deleted. The sources provided are almost all local from Ealing thus failing WP:AUD to meet WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 15:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »specifically the requirement to demonstrate interest at a national level per WP:AUD? --nonsense ferret 13:54, 24 April 2015 (UTC) In practice, a single non-local...
Click to read more »could find more RS -- though those would be mainly local press, raising WP:AUD concerns. (RDS is not local. It's a national French-language sports network...
Click to read more »newly-opened restaurant whose sources are quite local (meaning they fail WP:AUD). All are written like advertisements, as is the article. This article was...
Click to read more »[1], [2]), and the topic doesn't appear to qualify for an article per WP:AUD. NorthAmerica1000 00:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC) A redirect is more appropriate...
Click to read more »Coverage is from local media, not helpful in establishing notability per WP:AUD. AusLondonder (talk) 23:04, 10 March 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:26, 13 January 2019 (UTC) KEEP WP:AUD is 1) only for organisations, 2) a guideline, 3) completely illogical garbage...
Click to read more »flow of 51 million AUD is almost nothing when compared to Australia's GDP of ~1.14 trillion AUD or even Uruguay's of ~53 billion AUD; and as for the fishing...
Click to read more »Waddles 🗩 🖉 00:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC) Delete - Local coverage only - fails WP:AUD. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC) Delete I agree. Non-notable...
Click to read more »discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:56, 26 April 2019 (UTC) Delete I concur. The WP:AUD of VPNCritic site is debatable and it doesn't have the general interest of...
Click to read more »article, so far. --doncram 12:19, 20 February 2014 (UTC) According to WP:AUD local only coverage is not sufficient for notability and this trial seems...
Click to read more »discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC) Delete Per nom, GNG, and WP:AUD. The sources listed just don't meet GNG and there aren't any non-trivial...
Click to read more »about writing for a global audience, not deletion. If you're thinking of WP:AUD, it doesn't apply here; other guidelines have no such requirement (otherwise...
Click to read more »comes up are either local or PR driven / non independent, not meeting WP:AUD & WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/ARosend with no other contributions...
Click to read more »Comte0 (talk) 23:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC) Keep – Meets WP:GNG and WP:AUD per a review of available sources. North America1000 02:42, 5 December 2017...
Click to read more »– Meets WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:AUD. Several additional sources are available that are not based upon fundraising. Per WP:AUD, "Evidence of significant coverage...
Click to read more »news, newspapers or books. Some of the sources provided are local as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 23:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »(UTC) That prevailing view comes from a combination of guidelines like WP:AUD and the nutshell of WP:N itself - "Wikipedia articles cover notable topics—those...
Click to read more »(talk) 06:46, 5 September 2018 (UTC) Delete. Local coverage only, fails WP:AUD (product/event). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:41...
Click to read more »below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 09:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC) Delete. WP:AUD is relevant here: "attention solely from local media...is not an indication...
Click to read more »But taken all together, I think the coverage meets WP:ORG as well as WP:AUD. Keep. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC) Tentative keep...
Click to read more »WP:ORG: plenty of non-trivial coverage in available sources. Also passes WP:AUD, with coverage from national and international sources, including The Guardian...
Click to read more »German automotive publications. I'd say it does just meet GNG including WP:AUD. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:53, 29 December 2015 (UTC) Keep per the media...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep – Per sources in the article, appears to meet WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:AUD, the latter per statewide coverage in The Oregonian. Most of the sources...
Click to read more »listed sources, and in search results. Fails WP:ORGCRIT given insufficient WP:AUD. Allan Nonymous (talk) 00:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC) Delete - no sign of sufficient...
Click to read more »interests) was a failed proposal. What policy are you basing this on, WP:AUD? I think that works in the WP's favor in this context.Vexations (talk) 18:53...
Click to read more »multiple sources required by WP:SECONDARY, and two sources comply with WP:AUD, if you accept that the New York Times is a national paper, not a local paper...
Click to read more »(UTC) It seems all the coverage is predominantly local from Austin as per WP:AUD. The only wider coverage I found is WSJ but it's a 1 line mention and not...
Click to read more »newspapers in South Carolina...), this makes the sources invalid per WP:AUD. Other sources have rotten away except [3] which is a classic example of...
Click to read more »(e.g. [1]), and the topic doesn't appear to qualify for an article per WP:AUD. NorthAmerica1000 00:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC) Agree as to the topic not meriting...
Click to read more »selective merge would put this content in better context. I do note that WP:AUD (about local sources) is part of WP:NCORP, which does not apply here. So...
Click to read more »not found. What's listed in the article does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH & WP:AUD. Has been previously deleted at AfD in 2011 and then recreated by a SPA account:...
Click to read more »20:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC) Delete. References fail WP:ORG in scope (WP:AUD) and depth. Text is promotional to the extent that WP:G11 probably applies...
Click to read more »March 2020 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:ORGCRIT as nom says, specifically WP:AUD. Levivich [dubious – discuss] 05:18, 15 March 2020 (UTC) Keep per DiamondRemley39's...
Click to read more »A search for sources in gnews yields almost all local sources failing WP:AUD. No significant coverage found in gbooks or Australian search engine Trove...
Click to read more »dedicated to this specific coffeeshop and to another one. Unfortunately, as WP:AUD reminds us, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Predominantly local coverage as per WP:AUD with 5 of 6 sources from San Antonio. Would need significant coverage in...
Click to read more »reliablility and for a specialist audience therefore not conferring notability (WP:AUD). Also seemingly created by an undisclosed paid editor. I suggest redirect...
Click to read more »WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Coverage is mainly travel listings or very local as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 23:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »L235 · t · c) 06:09, 18 December 2018 (UTC) Keep – Meets WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:AUD, as per a review of available sources. North America1000 00:13, 20 December...
Click to read more »from participating in this new AfD discussion. The company also meets WP:AUD in that it has received coverage outside of its local area, such as in Spain...
Click to read more »roller hockey popularity when it was on prime time ESPN which easily meets WP:AUD. WP:SPORTCRIT is about players, not leagues or teams. -DJSasso (talk) 19:14...
Click to read more »notable as of today, and, WP:ORGCRIT (not counting her sisters, ORGIND, AUD and ORGDEPTH), has no place in the encyclopaedia. >SerialNumber54129...speculates...
Click to read more »roller hockey popularity when it was on prime time ESPN which easily meets WP:AUD. WP:SPORTCRIT is about players, not leagues or teams. -DJSasso (talk) 19:16...
Click to read more »members and rumour. They don't provide anything for the reader, failing WP:AUD as they duplicate what the film site. It is a listing with no encyclopedic...
Click to read more »WP:NONPROFIT . It has to pass NCORP with AUD in mind. So, @4meter4:, which source satisfies SIGCOV, WP:ORGIND, and WP:AUD? Graywalls (talk) 22:51, 6 February...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Faips WP:GNG. Coverage seems to be very local as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 11:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Heymann - TW, PIN Anna Kochanowska - PIN Peredrij Ganna Romanivna - PIN Aud Blegen Svindland - PIN Alia Abu Tayeh - PIN Ravilja Salimova Montserrat Soliva...
Click to read more »covers BioTech-specific industry product and finance information. Per WP:AUD, such coverage does not contribute to notability in and of itself. This is...
Click to read more »-- a 100+ yo brand, with evidence of cult following. USA Today meets WP:AUD, while a local magazine provides additional information: link. Both sources...
Click to read more »roller hockey popularity when it was on prime time ESPN which easily meets WP:AUD. WP:SPORTCRIT is about players, not leagues or teams. -DJSasso (talk) 19:16...
Click to read more »roller hockey popularity when it was on prime time ESPN which easily meets WP:AUD. WP:SPORTCRIT is about players, not leagues or teams. -DJSasso (talk) 19:17...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Comment Also WP:AUD applies in this case. LibStar (talk) 09:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »18 April 2023 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:ORG. Coverage is very local as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 04:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »is an acceptable source but it is a local one, a local newsletter. Per WP:AUD local coverage is not evidence of notability for an organisation. Again,...
Click to read more »WP:NORG criteria. Style Weekly is a local source. The books don't pass WP:AUD, so on. Graywalls (talk) 01:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC) Delete Subject fails WP:GNG...
Click to read more »thank Cunard for digging up these articles; unfortunately, they fail WP:AUD. Regards, James(talk/contribs) 06:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC) Additionally, source...
Click to read more »be either local or trade press coverage, which is insufficient to meet WP:AUD or WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:28, 10 August 2016 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »News & Observer. – The above source demonstrates that the topic meets WP:AUD. The News & Observer is published in another state, in Raleigh, North Carolina...
Click to read more »Non-notable restaurant whose sources are quite local (meaning they fail WP:AUD). All are written promotionally, as is the article. There's no evidence that...
Click to read more »clear delete. Every single source is a local source which doesn't satisfy WP:AUD. There is literally no claim of significance here either. I mean stuff like...
Click to read more »least one of those should not be local or of limited interest to satisfy WP:AUD, a component of NCORP. SK2242 (talk) 04:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC) Keep per...
Click to read more »Related/non-independent sources do not count towards notability. And WP:AUD says "attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and...
Click to read more »provided constitute significant coverage for WP:ORG (especially considering WP:AUD as this is a regional team for Mississauga/Toronto), but the article in its...
Click to read more »article as written, companies have the added burden of having to pass WP:AUD — which requires the coverage to expand beyond the strictly local — before...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC) Beccaynr Yes it does. Per policy at WP:AUD we can reasonably infer that local coverage isn't notable precisely because...
Click to read more »other sources I found were short pieces in local newspapers that fail WP:AUD. I'm happy to email full text to anyone who is interested, but they really...
Click to read more »Commercial organization, not a school, per WP:NSCHOOL. WP:ORGCRITE, including WP:AUD, applies. Local sources are also permitted for companies, but they must contain...
Click to read more »that satisfy WP:GNG. Obviously a company in both India and UK satisfies WP:AUD. If there were any problem with advertising or promotion, this would show...
Click to read more »Mrngcuegee Mrngcuegee (talk) 04:57, 8 August 2017 (UTC) Hi Mrngcuegee. WP:AUD states that, for organizations, attention solely from local media is not...
Click to read more »than just in northern New Jersey. Note, however, that the wording of WP:AUD has changed in the last few days after a discussion of whether The Star-Ledger...
Click to read more »despite considerable recent page views. The coverage in media passing WP:AUD is a line item or a brief passing. It's coverage is limited to mention as...
Click to read more »WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Coverage is mainly travel listings or very local as per WP:AUD. Also searched by previous name. LibStar (talk) 23:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2 December 2025 (UTC) Delete. Yeah I'm not sure most of these would met AUD. The HuffPost is a contributor (non-RS). Don't really know about How To Spend...
Click to read more »closed and not convinced it meets GNG as most sources are local as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 04:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »newspaper which clearly falls below the level of coverage required by WP:AUD. Rusf10 (talk) 01:28, 20 April 2018 (UTC) Very weak conditional keep. The...
Click to read more »local audience (lots in the High Country Press), thus not satisfying WP:AUD. Even coverage about the flooding is all exclusively local [1][2]. There...
Click to read more »block-evading sockpuppet. Additionally, the article's subject appears to fail WP:AUD inasmuch as the sources are all quite local. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:25...
Click to read more »most often uses. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:59, 12 October 2022 (UTC) Keep. WP:AUD states that while only local sources are not an indication of notability...
Click to read more »delete. The topic does not appear to have received enough coverage per WP:AUD to qualify for an article. North America1000 02:14, 2 July 2016 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »entirely to local media rather than national coverage that would satisfy WP:AUD, the little bit of sourcing that is nationalized isn't substantive but merely...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) Keep – Meets WP:GNG and also qualifies for an article as per WP:AUD, which states, "Evidence of attention by international or national, or at...
Click to read more »more than a very brief, incomplete stub about the organization, and per WP:AUD, there is significant coverage by international or national, or at least...
Click to read more »sources presented above, here is another source, further verifying that WP:AUD is met: article. North America1000 05:48, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Keep --...
Click to read more »Non-notable restaurant whose sources are quite local (meaning they fail WP:AUD). All are written promotionally, as is the article. There's no indication...
Click to read more »only DGG ( talk ) 02:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC) Keep – Meets WP:GNG and WP:AUD. See sources in the article for starters, and additional source searches...
Click to read more »news of installation of a parking system. This fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:AUD. In addition, one of the references used [1] does not backup the claim "MotoParking...
Click to read more »its ISO country codes). Another option is the standardized abbreviation "AUD" (used without "$"). In either case, use the {{Abbr}} template to indicate...
Click to read more »roller hockey popularity when it was on prime time ESPN which easily meets WP:AUD. WP:SPORTCRIT is about players, not leagues or teams. -DJSasso (talk) 19:14...
Click to read more »that have been published in independent, reliable sources. Also passes WP:AUD per national-level news coverage. The article would benefit from copy editing...
Click to read more »a lot of substantial coverage in national media outlets. In addition, WP:AUD states evidence of significant coverage by international or national, or...
Click to read more »significant, and from a reliable source, and provided that WP:AUD is met. Please note that WP:AUD is part of the Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)...
Click to read more »May 2018 (UTC) Delete- with all local sources, coverage does not meet WP:AUD requirement of WP:ORG. The last AfD was four years ago, it is not unreasonable...
Click to read more »a band have to do this before they are notable? I was concerned about WP:AUD, but note coverage outside of their region with this, and others. I also...
Click to read more »org, but they are registered with the ACNC[1]. 34% of their reported $496k AUD income in 2014 was spent visiting a single conference! (Not that that has...
Click to read more »and "MakeTechEasier") are what I would consider a large source and as WP:AUD points out, "at least one regional, national, or international source is...
Click to read more »industry/specialist media outlets of dubious independence (see WP:ORGIND and WP:AUD). FOARP (talk) 16:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »07:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC) Keep – Meets WP:ORGDEPTH. The topic also passes WP:AUD, having received non-local coverage in book sources. The organization has...
Click to read more »might apply here. Your citatations of WP:AUD and WP:ORGIND amount to similarly lazy drive-by complaints. WP:AUD asks that the sources be national or international...
Click to read more »not considered significant. Please familiarize with WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:AUD. Graywalls (talk) 03:42, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Delete NCORP fail. ThatMontrealIP...
Click to read more »WP:NCORP. Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:39, 8 January 2018 (UTC) Or if you wish, WP:AUD. I actually missed over Philippine Prudential Life: Great at 48 source, but...
Click to read more »sell these things, blogs or other WP:UGC, or niche sources which fail WP:AUD. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:12, 11 October 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »roller hockey popularity when it was on prime time ESPN which easily meets WP:AUD. WP:SPORTCRIT is about players, not leagues or teams. -DJSasso (talk) 19:14...
Click to read more »some part of the sources. While the news is of a national scope (see WP:AUD), the subject is based in Ireland's capital, meaning that it is more likely...
Click to read more »restaurant, but as it was published in a local paper I don't think it meets WP:AUD. Hut 8.5 14:07, 5 November 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »like the Portland Mercury and Willamette Week are not able to satisfy WP:AUD. Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia. Some local organizations of importance...
Click to read more »near the UBC campus, but meaningless for notability. Have you looked at AUD in WP:ORGDEPTH? Also articles that extensively quote long quotes of "the...
Click to read more »quick source analysis: WP:ROUTINE local news coverage that fails the WP:AUD test: [1], [2],[3], [4][5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Mentions...
Click to read more »[1]), so this doesn't appear to qualify for a standalone article per WP:AUD. NorthAmerica1000 23:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Selective merge to Victoria,...
Click to read more »but not enough to fulfill WP:AUD. Even locally, it is mostly passing mentions. Esquivalience t 13:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC) AUD is a mess, has been under discussion...
Click to read more »coverage in multiple reliable sources to justify that. Also consider WP:AUD: "attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation...
Click to read more »the company from Dayton, Ohio sources which fails WP:CORP, including WP:AUD. SL93 (talk) 23:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »coverage ever since. The San Francisco Chronicle source is local as per WP:AUD.LibStar (talk) 14:55, 8 November 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »be the local university source KPBS Public Media which falls short of WP:AUD. Probable UPE. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »these types of sources would seem to equally demonstrate the WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:AUD and WP:ORGIND criteria for sources establishing ORG notability. Perhaps additional...
Click to read more »14:25, 8 October 2016 (UTC) Delete As it doesn't satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:AUD. Almost all sources are local. Every single source I found is either a passing...
Click to read more »narrow, industry focused publication The Manufacturer US, which fails WP:AUD. The articles in Wood & Wood Products and Tooling & Production are dead links...
Click to read more »November 2017 (UTC) Selective Merge to Milwaukee § Cuisine. Doesn't meet WP:AUD per source searches in Gbooks and Gnews, but per sources, this is an "iconic"...
Click to read more »by serveral national sources is enough. See WP:AUD--180.155.72.174 (talk) 02:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC) WP:AUD deals all different organizations and products...
Click to read more »http://www.amazon.co.uk/Apocalyptophilia-T-Modell/dp/B00CF9P57M/ref=sr_1_18_bnp_1_aud?ie=UTF8&qid=1378076149&sr=8-18&keywords=a.t.m%C3%B6dell). Information about...
Click to read more »establish notability. What sources are there are local; not enough to meet WP:AUD. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC) Redirect to Broughton Rangers...
Click to read more »coverage not found. Sources are passing mentions, local sources not meeting WP:AUD and / or of WP:SPIP nature. Fail WP:NORG / WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk)...
Click to read more »entirely Oxford-based. On a search, I only found Oxford sources, which per WP:AUD is insufficient. The one national-level source I found mentioning OCW is...
Click to read more »airport on the basis of stories such as "County declines airport grant" per WP:AUD or trivial coverage such as "County renews Shingletown airport lease", I...
Click to read more »Delete. Sources presented above are all local to the subject, which fails WP:AUD. Absent a delete close, I wouldn't object to a very selective merge to Tower...
Click to read more »roller hockey popularity when it was on prime time ESPN which easily meets WP:AUD. WP:SPORTCRIT is about players, not leagues or teams. -DJSasso (talk) 19:17...
Click to read more »grounds other than WP:AUD, as well as the four I accepted as legitimate—would in my judgment qualify as at least regional, not local. WP:AUD doesn't really define...
Click to read more »04:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC) As an American living in Australia, I watch the AUD/USD exchange rate carefully. Presumably in response to Trump's new tariffs...
Click to read more »September 2018 (UTC) Keep – Appears to meet WP:GNG / WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:AUD having received regional level, independent news coverage that appears to...
Click to read more »of the subject. Left guide (talk) 09:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC) As per WP:AUD we would need wider coverage than local news sources. LibStar (talk) 22:40...
Click to read more »year [2]. It meets at least WP:CORPDEPTH for such a small company since. WP:AUD is the real decision here, it has had national/international coverage in...
Click to read more »Delete. Sources are all to military industry niche publications, so fails WP:AUD. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:49, 25 August 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »WP:ORGING in multiple sources with at least one being widely circulated WP:AUD. These plays are taking place, the venue is opening, and such do not count...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:AUD, the local coverage this attraction has received is not sufficient to achieve...
Click to read more »WP:BEFORE didn't find sources suggesting WP:NORG is met, in particular WP:AUD. A lot of local regions have local trade organizations. This doesn't particularly...
Click to read more »7 November 2019 (UTC) Keep - Based on The Mirror Cracked's sources. WP:AUD continues to cause problems. If this were a WP:CORP article then it would...
Click to read more »newspaper writing about a local business, exactly the sort of coverage WP:AUD excludes from notability considerations. These sources are so flimsy I am...
Click to read more »Thanks, Yunshui 雲水 11:50, 18 June 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:AUD as the company is covered only in local media and largely by one news outlet...
Click to read more »ABOUTSELF). We don't need AUD for that. So that is not a valid analogy. James500 (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2015 (UTC) And since AUD only requires at most some...
Click to read more »butt up against WP:ORGTRIV (an example of something being discussed) and WP:AUD. The one national source is AdWeek and as a weekly WP:TRADES, an interview...
Click to read more »WP:CORPDEPTH in independent reliable coverage in publications with high level of WP:AUD is not met. Graywalls (talk) 05:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »27 September 2020 (UTC) Delete vanity church. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:AUD as it lacks serious coverage in traditional general audience media. Graywalls...
Click to read more »Houston Chronicle[1], which is a statewide newspaper and is enough for the WP:AUD part of WP:NCORP, this should be enough for politicians. Also, there is local...
Click to read more »needs to pass WP:CORP, which is failed due to only local coverage (see WP:AUD). I did consider whether the fire might be a pass for WP:NEVENT but it appears...
Click to read more »nothing else on a search that meets CORPDEPTH (particularly keeping in mind WP:AUD, which requires topics to have garnered attention in general-audience media...
Click to read more »law firm's legal woes (WP:ILLCON), reported only in industry sources (WP:AUD) can make this organisation notable. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 13:30, 1 January...
Click to read more »(talk) 02:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC) No local newspapers aren't good enough, WP:AUD applies. If allowed them to establish notability, every mom and pop business...
Click to read more »multiple qualifying sources. See also AfDs for its software NMIS and Open-AudIT (all created by the same obvious COI editor LoCrow (talk · contribs))....
Click to read more »a look at those. They are all in niche industry publications (failing WP:AUD) and every one looks like a slightly warmed-over press release (not WP:INDEPENDENT)...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:AUD. While there is some local significant coverage, there is no regional significant...
Click to read more »cited by a good portion of 4,600 results in Google Scholar. So much for AUD Delete per the first nomination. ArcAngel (talk) ) 15:02, 1 August 2014...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. Note that WP:AUD currently applies only to organizations, so local coverage of a politician...
Click to read more »North America1000 05:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC) Delete – doesn't meet WP:AUD. North America1000 17:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC) Struck my !vote above. May...
Click to read more »sources, which are not local; several have national distribution. As such, WP:AUD is also met. See sources below and descriptions of those sources (bold emphasis...
Click to read more »coverage outside its area (or even outside one publication!) it badly flunks WP:AUD. There for sure isn't enough here for an WP:NCORP pass. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:55...
Click to read more »pass for WP:NORG since at least regional/national coverage is needed per WP:AUD. FOARP (talk) 13:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC) Several sources have been added...
Click to read more »SIGCOV source outside of local/specialist publications then it fails WP:AUD, a component of NCORP. SK2242 (talk) 13:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »(e.g., the biggest daily newspaper in any US state)" as required per WP:AUD. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »his above reasoning, I don't think the article passes WP:CORPDEPTH nor WP:AUD. The only references I could find mentioned the company in passing. Company...
Click to read more »SIGCOV with proper WP:ORGDEPTH, only one available source has appropriate WP:AUD, so also lacks WP:MULTSOURCES. —BrechtBro (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »"local coverage" don't contribute much towards notability per WP:NORG and WP:AUD. Graywalls (talk) 12:05, 19 December 2019 (UTC) I do not think merely visiting...
Click to read more »advertisement/communications related publication also limits the span of WP:AUD. Also, if it opened in 2002 and closed in 2016 and it's no longer talked...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:18, 22 March 2014 (UTC) Keep - The topic passes WP:GNG and WP:AUD per national coverage in QSR Magazine and regional coverage in the Orange...
Click to read more »hockey when it was playing games on prime time ESPN which easily meets WP:AUD. Clearly notable. Secondly WP:SPORTCRIT is for players not leagues and teams...
Click to read more »anyway, since it would hardly be preventing ongoing disruption? Just my 0.50 AUD. Mako001 (C) (T) 13:12, 3 February 2022 (UTC) Confirmed, No sleepers immediately...
Click to read more »Poughkeepsie Journal (although by itself it wouldn't establish GNG), as WP:AUD has never been extended to WP:NPERSON (despite proposals to do so). I'd consider...
Click to read more »worth at least AUD $35 million in today's currency via direct inflation. As purchasing power, this equates to something more like AUD $276 million. It...
Click to read more »This topic does not appear to meet notability criteria, specifically WP:AUD. Based on my searches, coverage appears to be limited to local news outlets...
Click to read more »reviewed the available sources, they're very much local coverage failing WP:AUD, with one of them being in the first person and likely not independent. The...
Click to read more »collection of information - it's a bus route of local interest only - WP:AUD says "attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and...
Click to read more »removed prod. Fails WP:NCORP. Defunct company. No lasting notability. Fails WP:AUD, WP:DEL14. scope_creepTalk 18:26, 18 December 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »com/forum/viewforum.php?f=21&mforum=4x www.digital-synthesizer.info/VA_Charts_US_Home_AUD.htm www.digital-synthesizer.info/US_05.htm. 2007-10-02 12:00:44: User ko:피첼...
Click to read more »only through profitable way. That is why it is passing WP: GNG, WP:RS, WP:AUD and WP:MULTSOURCES. Deletion is not the thing, but to Improve the article...
Click to read more »03:05, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Strong Keep - passes WP:GNG, WP:ORGIND and WP: AUD is met here. Enough industry specific sources -- CBcleaner (talk) 17:10,...
Click to read more »supermarket weekly, and that reference is a plain press release. In any event, WP:AUD holds that "On the other hand, attention solely from local media, or media...
Click to read more »one of the Top 20 markets in the United States" which is regional per WP:AUD. The linked article notes some fairly high profile speakers ("Past guest...
Click to read more »sources are NOT required for notability of organizations, per WP:ORG and WP:AUD: "Evidence of significant coverage by international or national, or at least...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Lord Roem ~ (talk) 15:12, 20 November 2019 (UTC) Comment - WP:AUD doesn't apply to schools as it is part of WP:CORP which explicitly excludes...
Click to read more »coverage of Aud Oudt is a single paragraph, stating The most important man behind the production of the reports on the 1968 Olympics is the swimmer Aud Oudt...
Click to read more »Corvus cornixtalk 21:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Delete -- with a budget of a mere AUD$1000 and a handful of unknown actors, I suspect this is just some amateur...
Click to read more »the WP:BEFORE source research by Cunard, passes both WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:AUD, which qualifies Kechara for an article on English Wikipedia. North America1000...
Click to read more »16:48:57 (UTC): User 216.211.251.208 t • c • dc • l • ef • b • bl; (4) to Audism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: frankpadams...
Click to read more »coverage, and searches did not turn up anything else. Fails WP:GNG and WP:AUD. Onel5969 TT me 15:00, 7 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »the company from Dayton, Ohio sources which fails WP:CORP, including WP:AUD. A company that performs there is at AfD as well - Human Race Theatre Company...
Click to read more »specifically WP:AUD. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:59, 19 September 2019 (UTC) Keep - it's true that this hasn't been covered outside of Maryland, but WP:AUD does actually...
Click to read more »roller hockey popularity when it was on prime time ESPN which easily meets WP:AUD. WP:SPORTCRIT is about players, not leagues or teams. -DJSasso (talk) 19:15...
Click to read more »notability four references (3, 6, 7, 12) are to local news sites. Per WP:AUD, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation...
Click to read more »roller hockey popularity when it was on prime time ESPN which easily meets WP:AUD. WP:SPORTCRIT is about players, not leagues or teams. -DJSasso (talk) 19:17...
Click to read more »article Blog Decent review that passes the review criteria, but fails WP:AUD. Is also a blog 1 paragraph review 1 paragraph about the app. The rest is...
Click to read more »here. A$—I'd link first time only, and A is enough (once it was AU, once AUD). Unless it's unclear, after the first time, you don't need the letter: it's...
Click to read more »Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:48, 6 September 2022 (UTC) Weak Delete As per WP:AUD it should be deleted. But it is well documented and so I can see why it would...
Click to read more »roller hockey popularity when it was on prime time ESPN which easily meets WP:AUD. WP:SPORTCRIT is about players, not leagues or teams. -DJSasso (talk) 19:13...
Click to read more »on an unremarkable private business. Significant RS coverage to meet WP:AUD & WP:CORPDEPTH not found. Sources include a non-independent corp directory...
Click to read more »15:53, 14 October 2007 (UTC) You are not using the word "famous" correctly. Aud Schønemann was born on that date. She was very famous as an actress, in Norway...
Click to read more »FloridaArmy (talk) 17:09, 29 December 2017 (UTC) Keep – Comfortably passes WP:AUD and WP:GNG. Source examples include, but are not limited to [1], [2], [3]...
Click to read more »which I had trimmed a bit. Even now, most of the sources wouldn't pass WP:AUD. For companies, COPRDEPTH needs to be satisfied and over here most of the...
Click to read more »26 November 2016 (UTC) Delete In addition to the above, it also fails WP:AUD. The media relevant to the topic is clearly of very limited interest. It's...
Click to read more »#2, a local interest puff piece about their CEO. This falls short of WP:AUD. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:15, 19 June 2014...
Click to read more »disproportionately deemed notable. This seems to me exactly why we have WP:AUD. – Teratix ₵ 07:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC) Aaron Liu, I'm not sure if this is...
Click to read more »in Montreal (talk) 02:09, 4 September 2017 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fails WP:AUD. The National Post non-local ref is because the restaurant defied the province's...
Click to read more »listings. It's lacking WP:SIGCOV (significant coverage with depth) in WP:AUD (regionally or greater circulated) independent reliable source that is expected...
Click to read more »prod. Only a handful of gnews hits and mostly from local press as per WP:AUD. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 08:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Keep – Meets WP:GNG and also WP:AUD, having received national-level news coverage in Newsweek, Maxim and CNET...
Click to read more »19:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC) Delete. Not notable since it doesn't satisfy WP:AUD. All of the SIGCOV is by publications named "Waste News 360" or similar....
Click to read more »participated in no nationally or internationally notable events or activities. WP:AUD - according to Wikipedian standards "attention solely from local media, or...
Click to read more »about a company, so the standard to be met is WP:CORP. I'm not sure how WP:AUD is met here. Looking through the sources that, judging by the titles, are...
Click to read more »29 July 2014 (UTC) Comment We need at least one regional source per WP:AUD.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 08:22, 29 July 2014 (UTC) That reference is from...
Click to read more »a business directory. So I think it is meeting WP:ORGDEPTH, and also WP:AUD, and WP:ORGIND, so I would say keep (though the downward trajectory of the...
Click to read more »Entities need more than local sources to establish notability as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 00:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC) That's a special guideline that...
Click to read more »basic WP:GNG, companies have the added burden of also having to pass WP:AUD on the basis of media coverage expanding significantly beyond the purely...
Click to read more »the restaurant of course. Generic old routine local reviews fall under WP:AUD and don't establish notability. Reywas92Talk 15:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2019 (UTC) "regional" or "local" coverage is not a factor in WP:BASIC. WP:AUD is for organisations (and is a garbage guideline), WP:GEOSCOPE is for events...
Click to read more »purely on that basis. It still needs to meet WP:ORG and for that matter, WP:AUD, too. For countless local restaurants and cafes garner purely local coverage...
Click to read more »as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability." and WP:AUD indicates: "Evidence of attention by international or national, or at least...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Google News only has [1] which is limited circulation, WP:AUD. There are COI tags on the article but I am not going to evaluate that allegation...
Click to read more »Comper |b|1864| Margarito Bautista |b|1878| Edward Everett Hale |d|1909| Aud Blegen Svindland |b|1923| Theo Sommer |b|1930|João Gilberto |b|1931| Preston...
Click to read more »Pretty much all the news articles seem to me to be local news, failing WP:AUD. The sources which may be regional apear to be about employment issues and...
Click to read more »WP:AUD. GNG requirements are definitely met. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 19:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC) I agree that site is annoying. I was unaware that WP:AUD...
Click to read more »obviously they are more awkward for others to verify. However please note WP:AUD. AllyD (talk) 09:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC) Would a scan of these clippings be...
Click to read more »that fails WP:SIGCOV: [10]. Local news coverage that fails the test of WP:AUD: [11], [12], (these sources also appears to be based mostly on an interview...
Click to read more »or permission. Cleaned. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:35, 7 May 2009 (UTC) Audism (history · last edit) from http://library.gallaudet...
Click to read more »mention the company and a [profile in a local Omaha publication that fails WP:AUD and that promises that Articles are positive. Basically, not a single source...
Click to read more »is the stanard to be met. "obscure publication" would likely not pass WP:AUD Graywalls (talk) 23:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »WP:ORGCRIT for notability, and is there significant coverage to meet WP:AUD? Below in green are the notability guidelines that apply, and below those...
Click to read more »regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source" for WP:AUD, and there is definitely also significant coverage, in sources that are reliable...
Click to read more »notability but does not seem to suggest this is required (it appears WP:ORG/WP:AUD is stricter) - from my view, it is the nature of what is being reported that...
Click to read more »local cultural interest, but it's unclear how much weight to give that. WP:AUD is part of WP:NCORP, but it's not a part of WP:NBIO. Ultimately, I don't...
Click to read more »be worth keeping. Notability is marginal at best; sources do not meet WP:AUD / WP:CORPDEPTH. Wikipedia is not a promotional vehicle for unremarkable businesses...
Click to read more »21 December 2017 (UTC) Delete -- sourcing does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:AUD. Bloomberg is a routine coverage of potential business transaction; Raleigh's...
Click to read more »sects, and sports teams. Non-profit schools are not required to meet WP:AUD, which is part of NORG. Instead, they meet WP:GNG, where the requirement...
Click to read more »