Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
defer to Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research when actually applying the two to article content. Shortcuts WP:AWP:A WP:ATTWP:ATT...
Click to read more »This poll is now closed. Shortcut WP:ATT/PWP:ATT/P Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT) is an attempt to unite Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V) and Wikipedia:No...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link jeffdean2.home.att.net; 0 records. jeffdean2.home.att.net: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en -...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link motos.home.att.net; 0 records. motos.home.att.net: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr...
Click to read more »att-uverse-reviews.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...
Click to read more »result of the discussion was delete. MER-C 12:19, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Book:Att läsa mars1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Incomprehensible...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link farna.home.att.net; 2 records. farna.home.att.net: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link bmwmotorcycle.home.att.net; 0 records. bmwmotorcycle.home.att.net: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en...
Click to read more »att-uverse-reviews.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link magyar-att.hu; 1 records. magyar-att.hu: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link ftp.pwp.att.net; 0 records. ftp.pwp.att.net: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck...
Click to read more »from a non-notable person. PeterSymonds (talk) 08:19, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Att Will (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »Reporting statistics of link jeff.dean.home.att.net; 1 records. jeff.dean.home.att.net: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en -...
Click to read more »att-loginz.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...
Click to read more »essay attempts to summarize the arguments against merging policies into WP:ATT or against particular implementations. It contains points distilled from...
Click to read more »spbdiplomis-att.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...
Click to read more »This poll is now closed. Shortcut WP:ATT/PWP:ATT/P Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT) is an attempt to unite Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V) and Wikipedia:No...
Click to read more »http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/SIS-80 OrgNOCHandle: SUPPO-ARIN OrgNOCName: Support ATT Internet Services OrgNOCPhone: +1-800-648-1626 OrgNOCEmail: OrgNOCRef: http://whois...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:ATT/PWP:ATT/P Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT) is an attempt to unite Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V) and Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)...
Click to read more »finska, svenska, eller isländska) och har svårt att förstå debatten på en diskussionssida, eller har svårt att formulera ett svar, kontakta oss för assistans...
Click to read more »notable either. Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC) Känslan av att jorden krymper växer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...
Click to read more »March 2007 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:ATT. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 06:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:V, WP:N and WP:ATT besides WP:SPAM AlfPhotoman 14:51...
Click to read more »This poll is now closed. Shortcut WP:ATT/PWP:ATT/P Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT) is an attempt to unite Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V) and Wikipedia:No...
Click to read more »the date you tried to de-orphan it to the orphan tag using the att parameter. The "att" is an abbreviation for "attempt", as in "I attempted to de-orphan...
Click to read more »undo) - Link: www.llicamunt.cat/files/221.att. * Links added in this diff: www.llicamunt.cat/files/221.att (8, 9, 8, 2) 2009-08-17 02:56:44 (UTC): User...
Click to read more »- Link: 131.175.183.1:1801/webclient/DeliveryManager?pid=1855777&custom_att_2=simple_viewer&search_terms=DTL2&pds_handle= (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2013-07-28...
Click to read more »http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/SIS-80 OrgNOCHandle: SUPPO-ARIN OrgNOCName: Support ATT Internet Services OrgNOCPhone: +1-800-648-1626 OrgNOCEmail: OrgNOCRef: http://whois...
Click to read more »This poll is now closed. Shortcut WP:ATT/PWP:ATT/P Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT) is an attempt to unite Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V) and Wikipedia:No...
Click to read more »deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Vad livet har att ge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:ATT/PWP:ATT/P Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT) is an attempt to unite Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V) and Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)...
Click to read more »This poll is now closed. Shortcut WP:ATT/PWP:ATT/P Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT) is an attempt to unite Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V) and Wikipedia:No...
Click to read more »05:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC) Wikipedia is most lacking in a way to enforce WP:ATT. We say "Encyclopedic content must be attributable to a reliable source"...
Click to read more »section of ATT; the V and RS shortcuts redirected to the reliable sources section of ATT; and WP:SYN redirected to the synthesis section of ATT. This enabled...
Click to read more »community discussion about the merger of WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:RS into WP:ATT, please see the talk page: Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Community discussion...
Click to read more »arin.net/rest/org/SIS-80 OrgTechHandle: IPADM2-ARIN OrgTechName: IPAdmin ATT Internet Services OrgTechPhone: +1-800-648-1626 OrgTechEmail: OrgTechRef:...
Click to read more »long as doing so is consistent with the self-publication provision of WP:ATT, and the undue weight provision of WP:NPOV. Reliable sources are credible...
Click to read more »USGS employee took the photo, you can upload it. Additionally, Kim and Forest Starr have released all of their photos under the CC-Att. 3.0 license....
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:ATT. Looks like a game someone made up and is trying to popularize. There is...
Click to read more »Cabal closed cases|]][[Category:Wikipedia Mediation Cabal maintenance|]] WP:ATT should have {{Disputedpolicy}} on it. It is the perfect example of what that...
Click to read more »per WP:ATT (both Urban dictionary and Everything.com are wikilike). It exists, but it has no encyclopedic value, no notability. Fails WP:ATT for lack...
Click to read more »WP:ATT and WP:BIO. Edison 03:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Keep Multiple verifiable film appearances, multiple reliable sourcing. More than passes WP:ATT and...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete per nominator, WP:ATT WP:CRYSTAL /Blaxthos 06:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Delete as NN, fails WP:ATT. An indy game in beta for a year just...
Click to read more »log) Article is an amusing and interesting read but nevertheless fails WP:ATT and WP:OR. Related to a series of other gaming articles also up for deletion...
Click to read more »few months now. Doesn't cite sources, may as well be OR. Delete, per WP:ATT, WP:V and WP:N-K@ngiemeep! 01:32, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. Article...
Click to read more »02:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:ATT /Blaxthos 06:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Delete under a fallen star. Fails WP:ATT, WP:NOR, dicdef. There are no Google...
Click to read more »doesn't fullfil WP:BLP or WP:ATT. Darthgriz98 04:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per above, fails WP:BIO, WP:BLP, and WP:ATT --Miskwito 04:49, 7 March 2007...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per WP:NEO, WP:ATT, WP:DICDEF and Propaniac. EyeSereneTALK 16:41, 27 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEO, WP:ATT, WP:DICDEF and Propaniac. Geuiwogbil...
Click to read more »Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 01:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom, fails WP:ATT ⇒ SWATJester On Belay! 04:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC) Delete. When I see the...
Click to read more »2) www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?device=LG+INCITE&q_sku=sku3140220/ (16, 150, 4, 2) www.wireless.att...
Click to read more »(UTC) If you look, you will find that only the LMP3mgs is unsourced, so WP:ATT is no reason for deletion. Henchman 2000 18:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Delete, no matter how notable, fails WP:ATT AlfPhotoman 15:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Delete fails WP:BIO and WP:ATT, cannot be sourced. --Nick—Contact/Contribs...
Click to read more »indications of notability. Fram 20:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC) Delete fails WP:N and WP:ATT Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 21:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC) Delete per Mr.Z. -Panser Born- (talk)...
Click to read more »Ni nu kan erhallafor ett helt ar till halft pris eller endast $1.00 genom att benytta Er af vidfogade vinstandels-kupong. A den dollar, som NI salunda...
Click to read more »esteemed businessman with his family website as reference for failing WP:ATT AlfPhotoman 00:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Comment. In general, someone with a...
Click to read more »Lukiradom <-> radom.pl; diff)). Reports 11:09:18, Fri Dec 21, 2007 pl:user:Att <-> pr.radom.pl (27%/11.11%/2.9% - Added link: www.pr.radom.pl/art/display_article...
Click to read more »public.research.att.com/ (1524, 51, 3, 1) public.research.att.com/ (1524, 51, 3, 1) www.research.att.com/ (1524, 490, 6, 1) www.research.att.com/ (1524, 490...
Click to read more »Abashokobezi (1906-2006)(Gallo): “Ett oerhört pretentiöst album att döma av titeln och vad som går att läsa om det. Om man som jag saknar kunskaper i de flesta...
Click to read more »org/att/IRC/eCOPIES/UNCED/Niue.pdf#. * Links added in this diff: www.sprep.org/att/IRC/eCOPIES/UNCED/Niue.pdf# (937, 75, 7, 1) www.sprep.org/att/IRC/eCOPIES/UNCED/Niue...
Click to read more »Stepmania mix which has no reliable sources written about it, failing WP:ATT's source requirements. The only references are to the group's website. Delete...
Click to read more »See WP:N , WP:ATT and WP:ORG , as well as WP:MUSIC. Edison 14:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:MUSIC, WP:ORG and WP:N , WP:ATT Artaxiad 21:26,...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 15:29, 5 April 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:ATT, completely unsourced. RGTraynor 16:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC) Delete, per...
Click to read more »eventually be deleted. Please, please, please familiarize yourself with WP:ATT and WP:BIO before creating any new articles. Your local perception of notability...
Click to read more »contribs) 22:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT and probably WP:N AlfPhotoman 23:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC) WP:ATT is not a criteria for deletion. — Omegatron...
Click to read more »CrimeLine." That doesn't anywhere meet WP:ATT. Delete as lacking any secondary coverage and failing WP:ATT. (I haven't found any sources while googling...
Click to read more »response to question 2, should be merged into Wikipedia:Attribution. WP:ATT is not everywhere verbally identical with its sources. Its supporters assert...
Click to read more »no assertion of notability, reliable published sources nonexistant (WP:ATT noncompliance). Wikipedia is WP:NOT the place to promote your band. /Blaxthos...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. Assure that all homeopathy articles on Wikipedia conform to WP:ATT and WP:NPOV. Maintain an atmosphere consistent with WP:NPA and WP:AGF on...
Click to read more »Wikipedia mirrors or apparently taken from this article (ie [1]). Fails WP:ATT and WP:V. Saikokira 05:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC) Comment.I did the same things...
Click to read more »consensus. CitiCat ♫ 03:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC) violates WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:ATT, WP:RS, WP:MADEUP, WP:NEO, etc. Misterdiscreet 03:26, 21 July 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »reliable sources, no assertion of the notability of the comic, so delete per WP:ATT, WP:V and WP:N-K@ngiemeep! 01:45, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Strong keep.A series...
Click to read more »creating "ATT" exclusive computer sock puppets (it is nice ATT has less than 100 customers, so one can certify with certainty that any ATT computer used...
Click to read more »sources. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:ATT, WP:BAND. Only 21 hits on UK Google [1], several of which aren't relevant...
Click to read more »recommendation. Anyone who played a major or vocal role in developing either ATT or the poll is barred from the closing committee for neutrality reasons....
Click to read more »begin with "Unprotection of WP:RS", "{{Disputedpolicy}} on WP:ATT", and "Protection of WP:ATT without {{Protected}} tag". The advice I'm seeking is whether...
Click to read more »articles as failing WP:ATT, although if those articles are attributed they'd pass. Delete on Flaxman as NN, fails WP:BIO and WP:ATT. Speedy Delete on all...
Click to read more »website makes no mention of anything in this article. To summarize WP:N and WP:ATT are simply not met. i kan reed 01:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC) Delete Ghits 12...
Click to read more »call... I'll do it. Sancho (talk) 05:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT. Might as well not exist per [1], [2] [3]. --Tikiwont 13:29, 16 March 2007...
Click to read more »The tone of the article is none too encyclopedic either. Delete, per WP:ATT and WP:N-K@ngiemeep! 00:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Keep - on the assumption...
Click to read more »admin, does not have a good understanding of a basic Wikipedia Attribute WP:ATT policy. He is publishing original research on Wikipedia. When another user...
Click to read more »it only lists rules of thumb, anyway. However, it really seems to fail WP:ATT and WP:V, and the article should certainly have been tagged for a major cleanup...
Click to read more »http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/SIS-80 OrgNOCHandle: SUPPO-ARIN OrgNOCName: Support ATT Internet Services OrgNOCPhone: +1-888-510-5545 OrgNOCEmail: OrgNOCRef: http://whois...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete, as is article fails WP:ATT AlfPhotoman 15:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Delete Doesn't meet BIO, ATT. - Denny 18:05, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »and WP:ATT (its own statistics page says it has "19 pages that are probably legitimate content". PROD was removed by anon. Delete as failing WP:ATT and WP:WEB...
Click to read more »se/blackjack-information/att-rakna-kort-i-blackjack-del-1/. * Links added in this diff: www.spelacasino.se/blackjack-information/att-rakna-kort-i-blackjack-del-1/...
Click to read more »posting editor. No references and has been challenged. References meeting WP:ATT and Notability would change my vote. Jeepday 03:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »August 2007 (UTC) Weak delete per lack of independent coverage to meet WP:ATT. This Google search shows that very little has yet been published about this...
Click to read more »Chopper bikes are here on AFD. None are notable. All articles violate WP:ATT and WP:NOR. Delete Junior's Dream Bike (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »maturity, as well as of poor knowledge of Wikipedia rules, specifically WP:ATT. Instead of realising your edits were maybe not very well thought through...
Click to read more »Black Falcon, and that it seems to pass WP:ATT.—Carolfrog 05:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC) Keep, passes WP:ATT, WP:BIO. That aside, I take "the subject asked...
Click to read more »detailed WHOIS. WHOIS report Summarized WHOIS report: AT&T Services, Inc. ATT (NET-12-0-0-0-1) 12.0.0.0 - 12.255.255.255 REGION 14 EDUCATION SERVICE CENT...
Click to read more »unlikely the article will ever satisfy the verifiability requirements of WP:ATT, and it is also unlikely that the article will ever meet the sourcing requirements...
Click to read more »kr/handler/Model-ProductList?modelCd=LG-KU2000/ (16, 5, 4, 2) www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?device=LG+INCITE&q_sku=sku3140220/...
Click to read more »com/lg/lg-expo-gw820-windows-phone-att/. * Links added in this diff: mobilephone5.com/lg/lg-expo-gw820-windows-phone-att/ (10, 15, 7, 1) 2010-05-13 02:22:49...
Click to read more »University dissertation from 2007: Pernilla Liedgren Dobronravoff, Att bli, att vara och att ha varit : om ingångar i och utgångar ur Jehovas vittnen i Sverige...
Click to read more »höjdpunkt under renässansen. Människor har i alla tider avsätt onsdagen till att hedra ett av historiens mest populära plagg, skjortan. Det har inte varit...
Click to read more »the protection as well. When it can be demonstrated that this can pass WP:ATT and not just WP:N then perhaps the protection can be removed but not now...
Click to read more »is subject's website Parsleyjones 10:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT and WP:BLP AlfPhotoman 15:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. NBeale 21:32...
Click to read more »at all. Realkyhick 21:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC) Delete fails WP:CORP and WP:ATT. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 21:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »hundred Google hits) TML 05:11, 7 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, per WP:BLP, WP:ATT and WP:N and per: if you can't show a spree like Bonnie and Clyde you are...
Click to read more »logs | views) – (View log) A mailing list that doesn't really seem to meet WP:ATT. I can't find any secondary published sources about this mailing list. Most...
Click to read more »logs | views) – (View log) My original PROD read "Non-notable, fails WP:ATT, Special:Statistics page unimpressive as well". It was removed by an anon...
Click to read more »a homeopath to justify this list. Plus it is in breach of WP:NPOV and WP:ATT. It asserts that these homeopaths are "important" which is a subjective decision...
Click to read more »1&disp=vahi&view=att&th=11fe812c3afe113e" (14, 1752, 2, -3) mail.google.com/a/vcat.cvcc.edu/?name=ccf32a38c42f1f28.jpg&attid=0.1&disp=vahi&view=att&th=11fe812c3afe113e"...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy delete CSD A7 - Non-notable football club. Fails WP:ORG, WP:ATT. Caknuck 04:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Non-notable web comic of some type. Article fails WP:ATT Nv8200p talk 02:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. JuJube 02:54, 29...
Click to read more »the technicality of peer reviewed journal publication.) It also fails WP:ATT due to the total lack of any independent primary or secondary sources. --EMS...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:WINAD, WP:ATT. Unattributed dictionary definition of a term, likely a neologism. Recreated...
Click to read more »06:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC) Strong Delete per WP:COI, WP:BIO, WP:NPOV and WP:ATT. Worst case of vanity I've ever seen... --KZ Talk • Vandal • Contrib 07:10...
Click to read more »WP:NOT as well). There is no out of universe information (which is against WP:ATT) and likely no chance for this (I doubt there are developer interviews geared...
Click to read more »disputes about the future of WP:ATT have nothing to do with whether the policies and guidelines that were melded to create WP:ATT, and which have been officially...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Speedy delete makes no claim to meeting WP:MUSIC and fails WP:ATT. Nuttah68 10:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »March 2007 (UTC) Delete fails WP:BIO (he was never elected to office), WP:ATT. Flyguy649talkcontribs 07:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC) delete per above. /Blaxthos...
Click to read more »11 May 2007 (UTC) Delete. Completely WP:NOT#CRYSTALBALL, void of any WP:ATT. Murghdisc. 12:18, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Delete as cancelled vaporware where...
Click to read more »any significant secondary or independent sources. This seems to violate WP:ATT in that self-published and potentially biased sources should not be the basis...
Click to read more »for notability for two months, has no external independent sources (per WP:ATT) to indicate such notability. However, it may of course be that amongst the...
Click to read more »and affiliate content. Kmsiever 19:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - per WP:ATT: completely unsourced, which we can't have, and probable original research...
Click to read more »established. Davewild 21:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC) Comment Any source that meets WP:ATT is in the context of conservapedia, pages should redirect there. He does...
Click to read more »March 2007 (UTC) Delete - appears to be 100% OR and cannot possibly meet WP:ATT --Haemo 00:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, but I think it can be sourced...
Click to read more »entirely fictitious, concocted to impugn some unknown by this name. It fails WP:ATT and probably WP:HOAX and WP:ATTACK. Deranged bulbasaur 08:22, 12 March 2007...
Click to read more »article, not the largest mall in its area. No statement of GLA. Fails WP:ATT by not having multiple independent sources with substantial coverage. Edison...
Click to read more »(talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Dwaynefelix (t · c) 23 May 2026 – Draft:Att Will (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by ~2026-30915-38 (t · c)...
Click to read more »Delete - possibly a hoax and explcitly states there are no sources. Fails WP:ATT. -- Whpq 15:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an...
Click to read more »Delete as not being verifiable through reliable sources. Totally fails WP:ATT and WP:MUSIC. NeoFreak 23:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Not notable....
Click to read more »(View log) Independent production with no third party coverage. Fails WP:ATT. Nv8200p talk 18:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC) Delete. Probably non-notable...
Click to read more »qualifier for deletion, but if it cannot be verified at all then it fails WP:ATT. Hesitant to !vote delete since i am unfamiliar with the subject and sources...
Click to read more »(View log) Unsourced list, no references, appears to fail WP:NOT and WP:ATT. Dragomiloff 20:20, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Delete pirate stations with callsigns...
Click to read more »Jammy Simpson | Talk | 20:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:BLP and WP:ATT besides WP:V and so on AlfPhotoman 23:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Delete as non-notable...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) This fails WP:ATT. There is no TV junkyard I can find. Nv8200p talk 13:16, 21 July 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »--Elonka 18:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Delete Non-notable, will not pass WP:ATT. Only 4 ghits, the Wikipedia article and 3 on one blog. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review...
Click to read more »page for a supposed secret society of media personalities. Fails WP:NFT, WP:ATT, at least. Speedy deletion tag removed by an anon. Resolute 23:56, 26 March...
Click to read more »sources and the plain text of WP:ATT states that such sources are unacceptable. The article has no sources that meet WP:ATT Otto4711 12:57, 13 March 2007...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT. WP:ATT. The most important terms could be mentioned in Blade: The Series, because...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom Tnomad 13:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:ATT - fanmade games that don't appear to have received any media. Wickethewok...
Click to read more »research.att.com (-1, 122, X, X R/X/L) public.research.att.com (-1, 122, X, X R/X/L) www.research.att.com (-1, 1010, X, X R/X/L) www.research.att.com (-1...
Click to read more »No sources and no evidence it's anything but a name on Google. Fails wp:att. Goodnightmush 16:04, 8 April 2007 (UTC) Delete Seems like a hoax and it...
Click to read more »2 July 2018 (UTC) WP:GNG has a general definition, whereas sv:Wikipedia:Att_skriva_om_sport#Idrottsföreningar is more specific. Wikipedia:Notability...
Click to read more »08:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC) Delete: no assertion of notability, fails WP:ATT. RGTraynor 20:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, no evidence of notability....
Click to read more »Delete for lacking verifiability for much of its content and for failing WP:ATT. Wickethewok 20:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC) Delete both per nom as being a league...
Click to read more »not just this working group. Policies and guidelines we are working on: WP:ATT WP:ATTFAQ WP:NOR WP:RS WP:V Proposals to find a community consensus: Wikipedia...
Click to read more »me. --Haemo 06:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC) Delete Violates WP:OR and fails WP:ATT. Edison 17:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOR and WP:V. No reliable...
Click to read more »involving the actions of various users, especially as regards WP:NPOV and WP:ATT, on "articles on paranormal and pseudoscientific topics", such as parapsychology...
Click to read more »failing WP:MUSIC. The article reads like spam, offers no sources so fails WP:ATT and on searching there are no obvious sources. Nuttah68 09:21, 7 March 2007...
Click to read more »requirements. ↪Lakes (Talk) 10:10, 9 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:BIO and WP:ATT, various combinations of Carl Williamson chaos only pulls a few ghits. MER-C...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Non-notable person does not seem to meet WP:BIO or WP:ATT. Appears to be some guy who's just a local volunteer. The "sources" are all...
Click to read more »Can't find any WP:RS sources indicating there would be anything for WP:ATT, which a notable MMORPG ought to have. Murghdisc. 12:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »just it. If you want to keep this article, then ensure that it meets WP:ATT - don't toss the burden onto other people. Furthermore, you still aren't...
Click to read more »log) No assertion of notability per WP:CORP. It is also hard to meet WP:ATT Nv8200p talk 17:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Keep a known and famous food chain...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Non-notable band. fails WP:ATT for attribution, has weak sources and valid CSDa7 Leonardobonanni 09:30,...
Click to read more »with its sources. - eo 20:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC) Delete fails WP:WEB and WP:ATT. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 20:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete per nom. Thewinchester...
Click to read more »Z-mantalk¢Review! 22:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:V, WP:N and WP:ATT AlfPhotoman 00:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC) Delete. Unsourced; fails WP:BLP. —Carolfrog...
Click to read more »article fails the guidlines for notability per WP:BIO. The article fails WP:ATT. Nv8200p talk 01:55, 29 April 2007 (UTC) Delete conflicts of interest, vanity...
Click to read more »sources on it and none are provided in the article. Delete as failing WP:ATT. Wickethewok 01:01, 17 March 2007 (UTC) Delete No sources + no assertion...
Click to read more »It has also been previously deleted as "nn/spam". Delete as failing WP:ATT. Wickethewok 00:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC) Delete Due to a lack of third party...
Click to read more »accepted. Primary issues (added by the filing party) ATTS Original Research ATTS Unreliable source ATTS tests dog breed temperament based on breed specific...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Unreferenced neologism, WP:ATT, WP:DICTDEF, WP:NEO; prod was removed by original author without addressing...
Click to read more »which has been documented in reliable sources enough for attribution per WP:ATT. No claim in the article or coverage found in Google searching shows anything...
Click to read more »WP:MADEUP. --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδιτоr 19:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:ATT with no references, and there doesn't seem to be any sources to be had, judging...
Click to read more »com/technical-articles.html (3204, 14, 3, 1) www.3dreplicators.com (3204, 6, 1, 1) home.att.net/ (3204, 759, 2, 1) www.rapidprototypinghomepage.com (3204, 7, 1, 1) technology...
Click to read more »Wikipedia does not prohibit the sourcing of information from blogs per se. WP:ATT only calls for Reliable Sourcing. WP:RS which is only a guideline, not a...
Click to read more »nomination, and merge any substantive material. (That's per ATD-R and WP:ATT.) ——Serial # 12:47, 26 May 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »requesting deletion, thus AFD is the wrong forum. This should be discussed att eh article's talk page if controversial, or just boldly redirected. -- Whpq...
Click to read more »MER-C 05:52, 20 October 2007 (UTC) Delete MER you are not alone, fails WP:ATT sounds like a WP:HOAX. Carlosguitar 10:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) No independent references WP:ATT or assertion of notability. Prod was put up 29th March with these concerns...
Click to read more »log) Contested prod. Non-notable independent wrestler, fails WP:BIO and WP:ATT One Night In Hackney303 18:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. Even by...
Click to read more »DINAMO BATUMI 0-4 - att: 500 SABURTALO VS TORPEDO KUTAISI 4-4 - att: 500 SHUKURA VS DINAMO TBILISI 1-3 - att: 500 ZUGDIDI VS DILA 1-1 - att: 400 These are...
Click to read more »silly idea to try making that into a mass AfD. Secondly, to further quote WP:ATT#Reliable_sources, "Edits that rely on primary sources should only make descriptive...
Click to read more »this even exists. Xyzzyplugh 13:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:ATT. There are zero hits on Google Scholar [1], and something just raises my...
Click to read more »entry for this one either. MER-C 09:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT and WP:NEO. Carlosguitar 10:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC) Delete Notwithstanding...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Article egregiously violates core content policies WP:ATT and WP:NOR, with no hope of redemption. Article has been previously deleted...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) This subject does not meet WP:ATT. No significant third party coverage. Article looks like a promo by the distributor...
Click to read more »seems to be an original research advertisment for investment that fails WP:ATT and WP:NOT. NeoFreak 16:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC) Delete as original research...
Click to read more »the source OF the joke is attributed, there is nothing compatible with WP:ATT which would support its notability or importance to be contained in WP. Slavlin...
Click to read more »band that makes no claim to notability and provides no sources. Fails WP:ATT and WP:MUSIC Nuttah68 21:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Speedy Delete per nom. Reywas92Talk...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Yet another page about an "up-and-coming". Fails WP:ATT and runs afoul of WP:COI, has already been speedied as "band vanity". Primary...
Click to read more »previous AfD.) Crazysuit 03:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC) Stong delete. Fails WP:ATT and WP:V, which are core policies. Also fails WP:RS. No sources have been...
Click to read more »pointed out above peristently fails to be referenced and does not satisfy WP:ATT. If it really is that notable then sourcing should be easy - that it's gone...
Click to read more »Speedy delete Notability not established, seriously fails WP:SOAP, fails WP:ATT... EyeSereneTALK 19:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »contents like [1] Soman 14:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:ATT. I haven't seen too many legit political parties with homepages on GeoCities...
Click to read more »involving the actions of various users, especially as regards WP:NPOV and WP:ATT, on "articles on paranormal and pseudoscientific topics", such as parapsychology...
Click to read more »in general, of the US. --MBHiii 18:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT and quite possibly WP:HOAX. Superficially this article looks extremely well...
Click to read more »(UTC) I'm fine with stubs, school stubs included, as long as they pass WP:ATT. I have a problem with stubs that do not show notability, regardless of the...
Click to read more »Seicer (talk) (contribs) 19:38, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:BLP and WP:ATT AlfPhotoman 22:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »An article on a non notable church that is unsourced. Fails WP:ORG, WP:ATT Nuttah68 15:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - there's nothing evident to make...
Click to read more »att/8a2171000000493s.pdfï¼PDFãã¡ã¤ã«ï¼. * Links added in this diff: www.shudo-u.ac.jp/information/9q879900000005yr-att/8a2171000000493s...
Click to read more »added by 24.5.171.112 (talk • contribs) Delete as advertising, as well as WP:ATT and WP:N EliminatorJR Talk 23:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Though this is hardly...
Click to read more »att-data-plans.html. * Links added in this diff: www.itechdiary.com/apple-launched-ipad-tablet-price-range-499-629-with-att-data-plans.html...
Click to read more »skriver detta meddelande för att informera dig om att det pågår en diskussion om att ta bort EMC. Normalt hade jag tyckt att detta var skrattretande, men...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 08:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:ATT; also note what links to it. (Or, rather, doesn't.) Abeg92contribs 15:07...
Click to read more »May 2007 (UTC) Delete Article describing vaporware with no chance of WP:ATT Murghdisc. 12:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Delete as lacking sources and notability...
Click to read more »strange sources. Virtual Cowboy 12:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:ATT and is at best questionable under WP:NOR. Without evidence that this is a...
Click to read more »violating WP:NPOV, WP:OR, unless that cannot be fixed (Please remember that WP:ATT is superceded by WP:NPOV). As far as I can see, there are valid multiple...
Click to read more »1 April 2007 (UTC) Delete Totally fails the mandatory requirements of WP:ATT not to mention having no reliable sources and being unverifiable. Wikipedia...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:ATT. There is no reliable third party coverage of the product to support its...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Notability of the subject of the article does not meet WP:ATT. Nv8200p talk 01:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC) This AfD nomination was incomplete...
Click to read more »involving the actions of various users, especially as regards WP:NPOV and WP:ATT, on "articles on paranormal and pseudoscientific topics", such as parapsychology...
Click to read more »00:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC) Delete: WP:CRYSTAL. No Reliable Sources (WP:ATT) - fails notability criteria. Wisdom89 (talk) 03:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »this AfD. Due to the total lack of secondary sources this article fails WP:ATT AlfPhotoman 23:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »11:41, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - Doesn't seem to be verifiable or meet WP:ATT. Wickethewok 21:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Restore Redirect. Outright deletion...
Click to read more »breath) WP:MUSIC (they're "signed" to their own self-produced label?), WP:ATT (only sources are to their own website and their own Myspace page), WP:N...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC) Delete - I'm seeing a total failure of WP:ATT here, which makes this whole article look like WP:OR. --Haemo 20:29, 8 April...
Click to read more »article. ●DanMS • Talk 01:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete, fails WP:ATT and WP:BLP, let alone WP:PORNBIO. -- Dhartung | Talk 02:52, 10 March 2007...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Consensus to delete per WP:ATT and WP:NOT. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 17:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC) List of...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:ATT. I am having trouble verifying any of the claims. If verified, the subject...
Click to read more »Article doesn't do much along the lines of satisfying notability and WP:ATT guidelines, and contains numerous OR sections such as "Flaw", and "How to...
Click to read more »not a directory and lack of attributable sources per the basic policy WP:ATT. The Geocaching article needs one paragraph about geocaching software (not...
Click to read more »what's in the the list. When someone wants to write an article that meets WP:ATT and WP:WAF, then it can be split out again. Until then, a list is the best...
Click to read more »of these items have received specific third-party notice pursuant to WP:ATT and WP:CORP. --Charlene 00:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Delete all -- The brands...
Click to read more »passing WP:BAND. Caknuck 14:50, 26 May 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:BAND and WP:ATT /Blaxthos 17:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC) Delete as per Blaxthos Nswinton\talk 17:45...
Click to read more »that nothing. Neitherday 21:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Delete Article fails WP:ATT and WP:BIO. No independent reliable sources to show notability. Edison 22:05...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) No WP:ATT sources, its pretty much an advertisement piece, doesn't meet any notability...
Click to read more »phrase _The Great Equalizer_, appears to fail the attribution test of WP:ATT, and fails the reliable sources test of WP:RS, and appears to be in violation...
Click to read more »and the material which is not probably shouldn't be included). NOT#IINFO, ATT and WAF refer. When someone wants to write about the character in a way which...
Click to read more »listed now. DumbBOT 13:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Delete fails WP:CORP and WP:ATT. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 22:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...
Click to read more »Regardless, this article doesn't have attributable information (see WP:ATT), which is a policy. It seems that you understand this, though. Sancho (talk)...
Click to read more »URLs, several make no mention of ATTS, and two are self-published ATTS documents. Zero provide in-depth coverage of ATTS. Some WP:SUMMARY-style information...
Click to read more »April 2006. Per WP:BLP it should be deleted unless references satisfying WP:ATT can be found and added. Blanked the content temporarily. Edison 20:37, 13...
Click to read more »field. Guy (Help!) 10:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC) Delete - per nom: fails WP:ATT by a mile, no sources, little assertion of encyclopedic notability, no indication...
Click to read more »yet strong delete - while I find the article quite amusing, it fails WP:ATT, having no reliable sources provided for the article. Delete per nom-EMP...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) The subject of the article fails WP:ATT. Nv8200p talk 11:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC) delete Not notable or sourced. Reywas92Talk...
Click to read more »article to the other was performed, so it must be preserved to maintain the WP:ATT history. Tag it with a {{R from merge}} to clarify such. -- 2pou (talk) 15:42...
Click to read more »Delete - no indication she passes PORNBIO provided, ditto WP:N. Fails WP:ATT. Moreschi Talk 17:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. For now, there's...
Click to read more »now. DumbBOT 14:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Delete fails both WP:OR and WP:ATT. Wikipedia is not a place for essays or orginal concepts. NeoFreak 14:52...
Click to read more »venue for symphony orchestras and respected chamber orchestras. Satisfies WP:ATT. Clearly one of the most important churches in the U.S. Edison 15:00, 10...
Click to read more »com/artists/az/page_jimmy/bio.jhtml www.modernguitars.com/archives/003340.html home.att.net/ www.led-zeppelin.com/news-pageint12-99.html www.thethamesboat. 2007-12-11...
Click to read more »set out in WP:Music. A1octopus 14:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:ATT totally AlfPhotoman 17:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Crossmr 14:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Delete reluctantly, fails WP:BIO, WP:ATT, etc. There have been blurbs in defunct dot-com era magazines like Yahoo...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete no claims to meeting WP:BIO, no reliable sources to meet WP:ATT. Nuttah68 17:53, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Delete obviously non-notable. /Blaxthos...
Click to read more »The article does not establish notability per WP:NOTE, and also fails WP:ATT - the only vaguely notable fact is already mentioned in Bug Juice. EyeSereneTALK...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Unverifiable, probably hoax, but certainly fails WP:ATT. The claim that Longstaff died when taking the picture seems hardly believable...
Click to read more »while also streamlining Wikipedia:Reliable sources into a simpler FAQ at WP:ATT/FAQ" was a big mistake, and the result is completely incoherent. This needs...
Click to read more »salvageable here. Hesperian 06:05, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:ATT. Flyguy649talkcontribs 06:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Delete Core policies are...
Click to read more »provides none. Deli nk 11:43, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Delete Without anything for WP:ATT there is no justification for article keep. Murghdisc. 12:42, 11 May 2007...
Click to read more »perhaps more a copyedit than a delete. More importantly the article fails WP:ATT and does not establish notability. EyeSereneTALK 08:46, 3 August 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Delete. This is nothing but a dicdef with an added WP:OR definition. Fails WP:ATT as well. --Charlene 17:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC) Delete-per nom ChrisLamb 02:30...
Click to read more »once and only includes birth date and birth location, not really a great WP:ATT source either. Catherine Kosarek, Medical Student, Marries Andrew L. Schlafly...
Click to read more »every reason why you need to use sources. Please take some time to read WP:ATT. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Isotope23 (talk • contribs)...
Click to read more »this notice. Thanks, Chaser - T 09:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:ATT, exhaustive googling turns up nothing, candidate cited took fewest votes...
Click to read more »Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:ATT. Even if it referred to pancake, it would not be a likeley misspelling. --Tikiwont...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete nonsense. JJL 22:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT, WP:N and WP:MADEUP. Carlosguitar 21:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »was tagged for lack of sources 2 months ago but still has none. Fails WP:ATT, WP:V, WP:RS. Not that notable either. (And possibly a copyright violation...
Click to read more »meets WP:N and the current version of the article mostly complies with WP:ATT and WP:NPOV. -- Black Falcon 20:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Notability not established or sourced per WP:WEB, WP:ATT. RJASE1 Talk 03:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Keep - I admit the attribution part...
Click to read more »nonnotable amateur web films. NawlinWiki 16:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT, WP:V and WP:N AlfPhotoman 17:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Article fails WP:BIO and WP:ATT. Nv8200p talk 04:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC) Delete as likely hoax. If Shon Holloway...
Click to read more »April 2007 (UTC) Delete - fails multiple policies, notably WP:NOTE and WP:ATT --Haemo 20:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC) delete. . Mukadderat 17:44, 13 April 2007...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:ATT only other sources I could find were sponsor press pages and article cites...
Click to read more »sources. –- kungming·2 (Talk)07:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - unsourced, WP:ATT is policy, and dictionary definitions are better off at Wiktionary. Moreschi...
Click to read more »p2pfoundation.net/user:jonawbrey (904, 42, 30, 14) www.research.att.com/ (904, 366, 30, 14) www.research.att.com/ (904, 366, 30, 14) www.mathweb.org/wiki/user_talk:jon_awbrey...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 08:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:ATT. The Ghits I find are not from reliable sources. (PS Pon Zi?) --Charlene...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) Unreferenced & unverifiable article (WP:ATT), non-notable fictional personality (WP:N), unresolved POV issues (WP:NPOV)...
Click to read more »involving the actions of various users, especially as regards WP:NPOV and WP:ATT, on "articles on paranormal and pseudoscientific topics", such as parapsychology...
Click to read more »unsourced neologism.--Wafulz 21:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOR and WP:ATT. If somehow it gets kept, it needs to be renamed following standard WP naming...
Click to read more »engelskspråkiga Wikipedias ambassad! Denna sida är till för att diskutera flerspråkig samordning som har att göra med Wikipedia. Om du har några nyheter eller frågor...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom. Seems like an indiscriminate list,WP:NOT#IINFO, WP:ATT refer. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »fan-fiction [2]. cab 03:47, 10 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom; seriously fails WP:ATT, lacks content, is original research... EyeSereneTALK 17:37, 10 July 2007...
Click to read more »March 2007 (UTC) Delete and play taps over their grave. Fails WP:BAND, WP:ATT, WP:NN. I liked the "Drive-in era film actress, Regina Carrol made several...
Click to read more »March 2007 (UTC) Delete per whatever article inclusion guideline - and WP:ATT, WP:RS, WP:NPOV. Moreschi Request a recording? 13:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Strong Delete, no genuine assertion of notability, fails WP:NN, WP:ATT. I don't see any cultural significance either. RGTraynor 16:45, 12 April...
Click to read more »appears to be no references findable for this creature. The article fails WP:ATT. PROD was removed without any improvement. Whpq 19:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »specifically requested public poll to gauge thoughts/support on the idea of the ATT merger. As it has been stated that the Poll is "dead" per users such as User:WAS...
Click to read more »entry. --- Tito Pao 15:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per above, fails WP:ATT, WP:COI. Only 115 Google hits [1], some of which are broken links, and almost...
Click to read more »overlooked at time of deletion Chris 04:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:ATT. I wouldn't say it doesn't make any legitimate claims to notability -- it...
Click to read more »be added. Walton Vivat Regina! 20:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:ATT which is not acceptable i.a.w. WP:BLP AlfPhotoman 00:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Romania-Insider.com. 13 February 2026. "DN Debatt Repliker. 'Folkligt stöd saknas för att byta ut kronan mot euron'" [DN Debate Replicas. "There is no popular support...
Click to read more »ever present.--Fuhghettaboutit 19:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT. -- Satori Son 19:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Delete Couldn't find anything in...
Click to read more »evidence of notability NBeale 07:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC) Keep. Now passes WP:ATT. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 04:48, 17 March 2007 (UTC) Keep per improvements by Carolfrog...
Click to read more »OrgAbuseEmail: [email protected] OrgNOCHandle: CTI33-ARIN OrgNOCName: Tillman Charles OrgNOCPhone: 1-615-401-4146 OrgNOCEmail: [email protected] OrgTechHandle:...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:ORG and WP:ATT. No significant third party coverage of the subject. Having trouble locating...
Click to read more »23 March 2007 (UTC) Delete no assertion of notability or signs that WP:ATT could be fulfilled. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 04:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »March 2007 (UTC) Keep. There are probably 3-4 or more sources that meet WP:ATT of semi-substantial coverage, that normally pass WP:BIO. [2] [3] [4] the...
Click to read more »well have a home on Wikipedia, but this should not. Fails WP:NOTE and WP:ATT. --Charlene 06:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC) Delete Seems like an nonsense article...
Click to read more »be a mass of redlinks. Improbcat 15:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT. No sources in this article at all, lat alone any that identify any artist...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:ATT, no sources provided or could be found. Fails WP:WEB or WP:SOFTWARE, whichever...
Click to read more »contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Absurd or not, WP:ATT is not an optional extra. If you disgaree with it, take it up on the talk...
Click to read more »WP:MUSIC. Nv8200p talk 13:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom, fails WP:ATT. Going through the Google hits for him, I can't find anything either. The...
Click to read more »p2pfoundation.net/user:jonawbrey (904, 42, 30, 14) www.research.att.com/ (904, 366, 30, 14) www.research.att.com/ (904, 366, 30, 14) www.mathweb.org/wiki/user_talk:jon_awbrey...
Click to read more »07:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:BIO, fails WP:NOTE, fails WP:ATT. Otto4711 21:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Note main author blanked page. Smmurphy(Talk)...
Click to read more »Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 13:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NOTE and WP:ATT. Carlosguitar 16:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) Article has no sources (thereby failing WP:ATT), has no incoming links (suggesting it isn't a topic of encyclopedic value)...
Click to read more »currently stands it should be reduced to two lines at best. It fails WP:WEB, WP:ATT various other policies. --Fredrick day 08:09, 18 April 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Abeg92contribs 10:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC) Drown this article ... err, Delete. Fails WP:ATT, WP:MUSIC, WP:NN. Only 33 Google hits [1], each and every one of them a Myspace...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) PRODded, but tag was removed by anon IP. Fails WP:NOTE,WP:ATT EliminatorJR Talk 22:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC) Delete unless citations provided...
Click to read more »MLA 10:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. DTD(speak) Delete: fails WP:ATT, WP:N, WP:NOR and by asserting that there's a genuine martial arts technique...
Click to read more »Merge and redirect to 9/11 conspiracy theories. Current content fails WP:ATT and WP:NPOV, is clear original research, and is controversial enough that...
Click to read more »Delete per Guy. Scienter 13:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC) Strong Delete: fails WP:ATT, WP:COI, WP:N and almost certainly WP:HOAX. There are zero relevant hits...
Click to read more »for licensing of physical therapists, and so I question their meeting WP:ATT with respect to their criticisms of a medical doctor. They are the source...
Click to read more »of any kind from February 2006 until article prodded. Completely fails WP:ATT, fails WP:NN as well, no reason to believe that the article will ever be...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Subject of article fails WP:ATT and WP:BIO. Cannot find any independent significant sources and cannot find...
Click to read more »(talk) 14:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fails WP:OR, WP:V, and WP:ATT, with no WP:RS. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 16:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Delete all...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Delete, fails WP:ATT. If reliable sources can be found, please recreate with references. —Quarl...
Click to read more »unsourced. Ohconfucius 09:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC) Delete fails WP:RS, WP:V, WP:ATT, WP:N. Possibly not notable depending on anchor stores. Sounds more like...
Click to read more »as required by attribution. --Pak21 11:41, 9 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - WP:ATT, WP:RS, WP:NEO, WP:OR, WP:NFT, WP:BOLLOCKS. Fails the lot. Moreschi Request...
Click to read more »(diff !top) - Link: hitechanalogy.com/verizon-iphone-5-gsm-unlocked-works-att-tmobile-confirmed/ (R/Xmeta/L) User is in trusted groups sysop, rollbacker...
Click to read more »this page. The result was keep as substantially rewritten and meeting WP:ATT. - Mailer Diablo 10:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC) Parras Middle School (edit |...
Click to read more »Resurgent insurgent 06:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Speedy Del per WP:OR, WP:ATT and WP:V. --KZ Talk • Contrib 06:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per my removed...
Click to read more »an orphan tag but now have incoming links Find "\{\{ *orphan *(\| *(date|att) *= *(January|February|March|April|May|June|July|August|September|Octobe...
Click to read more »Spyke 06:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC) Delete as a violation of WP:POV, WP:OR, WP:ATT to name just a few ... Arkyan 15:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC) Delete indescriminate...
Click to read more »identified and attributed, the article would be fine. As is it fails WP:ATT. --Charlene 20:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC) Delete. I find no assertion of notability...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Article fails WP:ATT. No reliable independent secondary sources. Written like a resume or advertisement...
Click to read more »21 March 2007 (UTC) Delete and set the perps on fire. fails WP:NEO, WP:ATT. Christ on a crutch, who in the hell felt it necessary for there to be an...
Click to read more »Link: libdtlprd01.its.auckland.ac.nz/webclient/DeliveryManager?pid=678886&custom_att_2=simple_viewer/ (R/Xmeta/L- still there) Displayed all 1 additions....
Click to read more »p2pfoundation.net/user:jonawbrey (904, 42, 30, 14) www.research.att.com/ (904, 366, 30, 14) www.research.att.com/ (904, 366, 30, 14) www.mathweb.org/wiki/user_talk:jon_awbrey...
Click to read more »before, and it appears to fail WP:ATT Orderinchaos78 14:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the Australian perspective. WP:ATT isn't a deletion criteria; if...
Click to read more »(UTC) Weak delete, no indication found of meeting WP:WEB guideline or WP:ATT core policy. Suggest redirect to Tupelo as the most common misspelling. Barno...
Click to read more »management. ZayZayEM 03:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Delete Soapbox, fails WP:ATT. Information of this sort can probably be found in WP:RS (IIRC, at one point...
Click to read more »—KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 04:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:N and WP:ATT. A quick Google search suggests its not a hoax but all the hits appear to...
Click to read more »stronger than those for keeping. There was nothing presented to satisfy WP:ATT and WP:RS. --Coredesat 04:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC) The Filthy Truth (edit |...
Click to read more »kommunstyrelsen uppdraget att ta fram förslag till ett kommunvapen. Upprinnelsen var en motion av Pehter Hill vars motiv var att kommunen, vid det tillfället...
Click to read more »A7), but these are not supported by multiple independent sources per WP:ATT, and, as the nominator suggests, the claims may be spurious. Delete unless...
Click to read more »verifiable film appearances, multiple reliable sourcing. More than passes WP:ATT and WP:BIO. --Jmacsjmacs (talk) 22:07, 18 October 2008 (UTC) WP:V is not...
Click to read more »bad faith editing. What would you like to change about that? enforce WP:ATT policy and remove original research Dab is supposed to be an admin, but he...
Click to read more »Louisiana-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT. Notability of the band is not established; links to personal websites and...
Click to read more »15:52, 12 March 2007 (UTC) Delete as probable hoax until verified as per WP:ATT. Moreschi Request a recording? 16:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC) Delete perWP:A...
Click to read more »Pokemons claiming "inherent notability" in the absence of sources satisfying WP:ATT. The baronets or knights may have only a listing is a peerage book(a mere...
Click to read more »log) Unsourced, unverified, and un-claimsofnotabilitied. Delete, per WP:ATT and WP:N-K@ngiemeep! 23:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Keep This is a comic book...
Click to read more »att-5-billion-for-network-access-amid-feud-with-t-mobile/ https://www.theverge.com/2021/7/19/22583799/dish-network-att-mvno-t-mobile-5g-4g...
Click to read more »References https://www.aftonbladet.se/svenskahjaltar/a/rAGm63/luca-16-att-radda-djur-ar-att-radda-oss-sjalva https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/skane/15-ari...
Click to read more »independent, credible reviews, we can't cover this topic while meeting WP:ATT and WP:NPOV. Maybe in the future, but when we can, it's a different story...
Click to read more »Nate1481 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC). Delete per nom. Fails WP:ATT and WP:NN, and unlikely given the usual standard for middle school articles...
Click to read more »Delete per nom. Rulesdoc 22:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Delete - per nom. Fails WP:ATT. Morenooso 23:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »whom no verifiable or attributable information is available, failing WP:ATT/WP:V. Searching google for the phrases "tony tran" and "dj mystik" yields...
Click to read more »passes WP:ATT and WP:BIO. — Krimpet (talk/review) 20:52, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Keep article is well-sourced, clearly meets WP:BIO and WP:ATT. What part...
Click to read more »WP:PORNBIO. Flyguy649talkcontribs 04:56, 7 April 2007 (UTC) Delete fails WP:ATT and WP:PORNBIO. --KZTalk• Contribs 10:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »11:59, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Delete, one would assume there are chances of WP:ATT once this game is actually released, but until then it is based on 1st source...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (added by closing admin) (copyvio) Fails WP:ATT. Cannot find reliable third party references to verify the information in...
Click to read more »but there is not one text citation to back them up. It utterly fails WP:ATT. Note to the deletion sorting team: please tell our Indian friends so that...
Click to read more »csWP article to translate for expansion. Absurdly unjustified nomination. Att he time of the nomination, the interwiki link was present--and checking the...
Click to read more »BenRG (talk) 23:30, 15 April 2011 (UTC) I have hundreds of e-mails in my ATT account which I would like to forward to my new gmail account. Is there a...
Click to read more »March 2007 (UTC) keep. Lampman 16:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Keep. Passes WP:ATT. The inventor himself may be only slightly notable, but I can't see how the...
Click to read more »changed. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:ATT, WP:ORG with flying colors. "Organizations whose activities are local in...
Click to read more »primarysources tag has been here since Februrary. Suggest deletion on basis of WP:ATT and WP:SOFTWARE (That's WP:V and WP:N now). Prod contest reason was that...
Click to read more »the most skillful researcher in the world, but as is, the article fails WP:ATT. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 03:31, 30 April 2007 (UTC) Delete Per nomination. Useless...
Click to read more »vandalised at 01:35 GMT; reverted cab 02:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT and Irene Ringworm. cab 02:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC) Delete. Just like everybody...
Click to read more »revealed soon......)??? Tellyaddict 16:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, non-WP:ATT--Slp1 21:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC) Delete for about a half dozen reasons, including...
Click to read more »health information. Address:[email protected] Phone: Google search [email protected] by Martin Edit to definition on alternative medicine...
Click to read more »Delete Not one of the seven listed references meets the standards of WP:ATT. Two are from Myspace, three are from blogs, one is from an Ottawa Senators...
Click to read more »several Wikipedia-related hits. It really doesn't seem like this meets WP:ATT, as the only sources available seem to be primary and no secondary sources...
Click to read more »deletions. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 17:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:ATT, WP:NOR, WP:NN. Why do we need an article doing nothing more than listing...
Click to read more »shortcuts to notability in the disputed WP:PORNBIO but does not meet WP:ATT WP:BIO or WP:N. Edison 22:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Keep clearly meets WP:PORNBIO...
Click to read more »—SparklingWiggleGet a job! 20:44, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - Doesn't seem to meet WP:ATT, no references. I don't know why SparklingWiggle says WP:BAND. Wickethewok...
Click to read more »WP:BIO, it appears that this person's magazines are noted enough to pass WP:ATT, but the person is not. It does appear to be a WP:COI situation. Barno 17:19...
Click to read more »artículos de Wikipedia en su propio idioma. Swedish: Använd en QR-läsare för att läsa Wikipedia-artiklar på ditt eget språk. Thanks so much :) Mrjohncummings...
Click to read more »violates WP:BIO --Mhking 15:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Strong Delete, fails WP:ATT, WP:HOAX. Heaven knows why, but take a look at that posted "Times" jpg. It...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) No assertion of notability in the article. Fails WP:ATT. No reliable third party media coverage. Nv8200p talk 01:05, 29 June 2007...
Click to read more »already. As for the article, careful pruning will bring it back inline with WP:ATT.hateless 21:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC) Strong Keep. The article needs a cleanup...
Click to read more »there is coverage of this book out there. I found one book that talks about ATT heavily and two in-depth articles about it, and I'm just getting started...
Click to read more »following traceroute: 7 tbr2-cl15.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.10.54) 30.276 ms 30.708 ms 32.286 ms 8 tbr1-cl17.attga.ip.att.net (12.122.10.70) 32.849 ms 32.056...
Click to read more »this one.--Sethacus 16:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC) Delete my motto: fails WP:ATT and WP:N. Probably a WP:HOAX. Carlosguitar 18:43, 18 October 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »logs | views) – (View log) subject doesn't meet WP:BIO, article fails WP:ATT, requests for third-party references and to establish notability have simply...
Click to read more »searches) likely unattributable. At best, both expressions fail WP:NEO and WP:ATT. --Charlene 19:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC) Delete - not for things made up .....
Click to read more »in mind that blogs aren't normally considered reliable publishers (see WP:ATT) and the only references I found for the phrase "365 days photo" appear to...
Click to read more »per everyone else. Acalamari 17:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - per WP:ATT, no sourcing to back up the claims made. As such is not encyclopedic content...
Click to read more »little-known (outside certain circles) operating system. No sources, fails WP:ATT. -- Dhartung | Talk 05:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC) Delete non-notable mailing...
Click to read more »absolutely no sources. Fails WP:BIO, WP:NOT a directory/gazeteer and WP:ATT. Nuttah68 08:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Delete The information in the article...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) NN comic book writer, unverified stub. Delete per WP:ATT and WP:N K@ngiemeep! 21:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC) Weak Delete. I had placed...
Click to read more »silversmed, anlitades ofta av för att rita främst kartor. Hon var också en hängiven spelare. – Man måste komma ihåg att det här var långt innan datorerna...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT crystal ball, WP:ATT, WP:V. Complete speculation about a film that has not been confirmed, or...
Click to read more »and youtube) there are no significant mentions of the event that pass WP:ATT. Fails all elements of WP:BIO and should mearly be a line in the Pot Luck...
Click to read more »Thanks, Mailer Diablo 15:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC) Strong Delete, fails WP:ATT, WP:NN, WP:HOAX, and WP:BULLSHIT. There are zero Google hits for this person...
Click to read more »se/arkiv/familj/fotograf-med-egen-profil/) says it all: "man kan utan vidare påstå att Kary Lasch var en legendar". Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 16:43, 13 October...
Click to read more »about your credentials Wikipedia:Credential ban This proposed addition to WP:ATT which begins "Editors should not make claims about their professional expertise...
Click to read more »series of scholarly documentation on the church. This satisfies WP:V and WP:ATT and its influence as a national church denomination satisfies WP:ORG. Content...
Click to read more »16:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Keep. With sources added to article, passes WP:ATT. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 23:55, 18 March 2007 (UTC) Keep, now that multiple sources...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Information in article fails WP:ATT. Even then I think subject would not meet guidelines in WP:BIO. Nv8200p talk...
Click to read more »record.--Anthony.bradbury 11:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC) Delete; NN, fails WP:ATT, WP:COI and probably WP:BULLSHIT into the bargain. What in the heck is this...
Click to read more »et al where such an expression is used - let alone bring sources per WP:ATT that show or name any of these "Turkish settlement". The title has WP:OR...
Click to read more »sources, which makes this look a lot like original research. Article fails WP:ATT. Fram 07:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Second attempt Fram has already attempted...
Click to read more »of this AfD, I might change my mind. But for now, this article fails WP:ATT, and seems to be a non-notable neologism to boot. Given the number of chatroom...
Click to read more »meet criteria for WP:BIO. Appleworm 14:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT AlfPhotoman 15:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Delete. The "Newington College Show"...
Click to read more »Original research, per nomination Nyttend 12:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:ATT. /Blaxthos 16:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Delete Do we have a guideline for "something...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Notability not established per WP:ORG, and unsourced (per WP:ATT). An advocacy group with possibly notable members, but the group itself seems...
Click to read more »March 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete as above. This person fails WP:BIO and WP:ATT, so would not survive in any case. --Dhartung | Talk 23:00, 4 March 2007...
Click to read more »below this notice. Thanks, Sancho 05:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT, WP:NOTE etc. The notability of the subject is not established by the article...
Click to read more »argument. No credential is a substitute for content policies such as WP:ATT and WP:NPOV. Verifing credentials threatens to split the community into two...
Click to read more »18? and sv:Wikipedia:Bybrunnen#Föreslagen nedstängning av Wikipedia för att stoppa amerikanskt lagförslag. ta.wikipedia.org - banner with links to...
Click to read more »is unsourced, thereby failing WP:ATT. Picaroon 17:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Delete Agree with Picaroon. WP:NOT and WP:ATT. Adm58 22:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete' Blatant OR full of personal opinions. Fails WP:N, WP:ATT, and WP:SCI. Even the statement this this could become popular is a personal...
Click to read more »March - South Lanarkshire Libraries digital team meeting presentation (15 att) 1hr Wednesday 7 March - Inverclyde Editathon (1-5) Tuesday 13 March - South...
Click to read more »are reliable (meeting WP:ATT and which have coverage which goes into depth about the school. Does not appear to satisfy WP:ATT, WP:N or WP:AI. (Would it...
Click to read more »Keep It appears notable as such a large mall would likely meet WP:N and WP:ATT if propely researched. I would keep and tag for sources. --Kevin Murray 01:55...
Click to read more »that this article violates the following policies: WP:ATT, WP:N, WP:V, WP:NEO, WP:SYN, WP:RS, ATT/RS. While the development of content in relation to the...
Click to read more »form av halmbalar - utan att det riktigt framgår om det är de betande korna eller deras medialisering som är "poängen", för att säga det på skånska. En...
Click to read more »amazed my prod was deleted... fails WP:BAND, smells like WP:HOAX, fails WP:ATT.Garrie 05:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an...
Click to read more »this. 23skidoo 14:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - completely unsourced, WP:ATT is policy, and probably inherently POV. Moreschi Request a recording? 14:54...
Click to read more »in disguise as an article). This not to mention WP:POV, WP:OR, WP:NOT, WP:ATT and probably more policy pages that it violates. The Filmaker 15:56, 16 May...
Click to read more »best this deserves no more than a Merge and Delete. Non-notable, fails WP:ATT, WP:BULLSHIT. Yay for "random article." (Mind you, I can get behind a micronation...
Click to read more »Template:Infobox Country School Olympics and Template:Country flag IOC alias ATT. I'm not sure what speedy category could be used for these, if any, but considering...
Click to read more »Kauper and one of his successors, William F. Baxter, for their roles in the ATT breakup. Link.. Here's another link, this one from a book describing Kauper...
Click to read more »bit and cited RSSSF to remove poor citations Made numerous fixes in the att. and venue columns per sources Conducted a lengthy review of each match,...
Click to read more »de.a.cce.s.s.c.s.e.v@[email protected]@[email protected]@www.med.nu.ac.th: Linksearch en...
Click to read more »anything. Noth that there's any information beyond a title anyways. Fails WP:ATT. -- Whpq 15:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an...
Click to read more »nominator that the current article is unsalvageably POV and largely fails WP:ATT. Delete unless substantially rewritten and sourced by the end of this AfD...
Click to read more »their content, which is not acceptable per WP:V et al, or per the new WP:ATT proposal. Exegesis must be derived from secondary sources. Angus McLellan...
Click to read more »• User compare report Auto-generated every hour. All, except IP, blocked att frwiki per sock investigation at fr:Wikipédia:Vérificateur d'adresses IP/Requêtes#Horcujet...
Click to read more »p2pfoundation.net/user:jonawbrey (609, 32, 20, 10) www.research.att.com/ (609, 355, 20, 10) www.research.att.com/ (609, 355, 20, 10) www.mathweb.org/wiki/user_talk:jon_awbrey...
Click to read more »not meet the primary notability criteria for articles, not to mention WP:ATT/WP:V, and as such, should be deleted. Xtifr tälk 21:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »cite the article. Will change my decesion if it can be proven to meet WP:ATT Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 19:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC) Delete - fails notability...
Click to read more »a virtually uncontested 1972 congressional election. And according to WP:ATT, the burden of proof, with regard to whether there are adequate sources,...
Click to read more »WooyiTalk, Editor review 03:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:BIO, WP:ATT. WP:SPAM and WP:COI come into play too, since the creator User:Nangellini...
Click to read more »Could have been a speedy.Merkinsmum 11:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:ATT - unattributable per Google search and possibly WP:SPAM. --Charlene 18:59...
Click to read more »odour of hoax about it. --Folantin 15:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - per WP:ATT, completely unsourced. 9 ghits hardly gives any impression of notability...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete. How can this article pass WP:MUSIC if it doesn't pass WP:ATT? The sources don't look good enough to me. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 04:29, 2 July...
Click to read more »06:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC) Keep pending copyedit to better comply with WP:ATT (using the sources above given by Chubbles would be an excellent start)....
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.apextm.com/att-phone-number/ (R/Xmeta/L- removed) Flagged for COI: (overlap) Username overlaps...
Click to read more »Love Indoctrination, then you can pinpoint the rather obvious WP:COI and WP:ATT issues with accuracy. Prods removed by author. JuJube 08:27, 7 March 2007...
Click to read more »-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 17:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT etc. Totally subjective. EyeSereneTALK 18:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC) Delete clearly...
Click to read more »film and movie series, clear violation of numerous policies. Such as WP:ATT WP:CRYSTAL. Creator has removed numerous speedy delete tags. My advice make...
Click to read more »remarkably hoaxy to me. --Folantin 15:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - per WP:ATT, completely unsourced. Moreschi Request a recording? 15:42, 1 March 2007...
Click to read more »notability. /Blaxthos 06:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:N and WP:ATT and per nom. Orderinchaos78 15:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per the above...
Click to read more »Russian editors can verify the story; else it should be deleted for failing WP:ATT. YechielMan 18:43, 16 March 2007 (UTC) Delete Even if it did take place,...
Click to read more »it smells rather hoaxy. Arkyan 15:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT - There are twice as many Google hits for "Thrakmas," a made-up holiday in...
Click to read more »16:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per various criteria inc WP:NOT#DICT and WP:ATT EyeSereneTALK 08:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC) Delete or move to Wikitionary this...
Click to read more »www.jet-engine.net/miltfspec.html caea.free.fr/fr/coll/mirage5.html home.att.net/ www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Society_&_Culture/lavi.html home...
Click to read more »removal notwithstanding. /Blaxthos 06:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:ATT, WP:NFT. I can't see grounds for a speedy, but this is just another insignificant...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Neologism I can't find in a real dictionary; thus WP:ATT/WP:NOR --Clay Collier 05:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Delete, along with Agendist...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) Non-notable. Indiscriminate information. WP:ATT. Etc. Saikokira 02:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC) Delete - Per nom. Fails WP:NOT...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Keep. The policy concern, WP:ATT, has been addressed, and it appears to pass WP:NOTE's standard as well. Shimeru...
Click to read more »Gets few hits other than his blogsite which is not the best link per WP:ATT and WP:EL. Fails WP:N. Morenooso 03:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per above...
Click to read more »--ZayZayEM 07:24, 16 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - unsourced, delete per WP:ATT, little assertion of meaningful notability. Moreschi Request a recording...
Click to read more »--Haemo 19:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC) Strong Delete - Fails WP:SCIENCE and WP:ATT. No evidence of notability, no attribution, and strong evidence of personal...
Click to read more »often created first and expanded and sourced later. The meaning behind WP:ATT is to delete articles that cannot be sourced, not those that are not sourced...
Click to read more »(daaaaah!) 20:29, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - Original research, can't meet WP:ATT. Wickethewok 21:09, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Strong delete - Another list that...
Click to read more »languages) or access. Still needs more cleanup, but I think it meets WP:ATT. —Carolfrog 03:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Delete as hoax. --Lockley 21:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Delete as lacking WP:ATT, which could be because it is a hoax. I have notified User:Lilidor of this...
Click to read more »material written on Michelangelo by art historians - use it! (see WP:RS and WP:ATT). Awadewit 07:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC) Oppose Needs more sources, I didn;t...
Click to read more »assertion of notability is a big number. Unsourced beyond fansites. Fails WP:ATT, WP:RS, WP:V, WP:N and WP:WEB. DarkSaber2k 12:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC) Don't...
Click to read more »similar and written from personal experience or primary sources. Fails WP:ATT. -- Dhartung | Talk 05:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC) Delete as NN, WP:OR, possible...
Click to read more »up. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-24 15:11Z Delete - definitely fails WP:ATT. The only non-trivial reference is not a reliable source. Unless someone...
Click to read more »of WP:ORG. RJASE1 Talk 00:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Delete fails WP:ORG, WP:ATT, and contains weasel words. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 00:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »19:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC) Keep, it has a CNN story, appears to meet WP:ATT. Abeg92contribs 19:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC) Keep per reasons given so far...
Click to read more »has had 6 issues, not making it particularly long-running. Delete per WP:ATT and WP:N K@ngiemeep! 05:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Delete This article has been...
Click to read more »multiple, independent third-party sources can be found (i.e. meeting the WP:ATT policy). My 20 minute web search didn't turn up any such sources, but maybe...
Click to read more »into Negativland - not enough content to be worth an article. Also fails WP:ATT and WP:BIO. EyeSereneTALK 18:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC) Merge and redirect to...
Click to read more »till Svenska Dagbladet. Tyvärr har något hänt som gör att sidan inte kan visas. Klicka här för att försöka ladda SvD på nytt. Aktuell driftinformation....
Click to read more »self-promotion) that exists in this article, there is scant that is actually WP:ATT from what I can see. Such a "world famous" songwriter with a series of major...
Click to read more »14 September 2007 (UTC) Delete and redirect per Zetawoof. Also fails WP:ATT and WP:N. Carlosguitar 18:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »do! Mike 17:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Delete article under WP:BLP failing WP:ATT AlfPhotoman 18:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Delete: Non-notable and it seems more...
Click to read more »NickelShoe (Talk) 20:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:ATT, WP:N, WP:BIO, or WP:MUSIC as of yet. WP:NOT#CRYSTAL, furthermore. Moreschi...
Click to read more »be established because the article lacks primary/secondary sources per WP:ATT. Google search didn't turn up much. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 07:05, 6 March...
Click to read more »dump, & many of the sources listed are simply other wikipedia pages. WP:ATT/WP:N: Claims of grandeur without attribution. No reliable sources to verify...
Click to read more »information. Given no reliable (or any other kind of) attributions per WP:ATT, it's not possible to determine if this there is any such thing as this supposed...
Click to read more »Schools-related deletions. Camaron1 | Chris 17:14, 9 April 2007 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:ATT, WP:NN. I'd be interested in the basis upon which User:Piccadilly believes...
Click to read more »the largest TV channel Svenskarna är dåliga på att göra backup på sina datorer. Finns det risk för att vår historia (the video in not online anymore)...
Click to read more »mean Guy. One Night In Hackney303 12:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:ATT. --Charlene 12:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC) I once read about a time about the middle...
Click to read more »about it in Göteborgs-Posten from the same year, "Lerumskvinna har chans att bli årets företagare". Beyond that, I can only find passing mentions. /Julle...
Click to read more »provides useful insight into that aspect of the culture. Per proposal at WP:ATT it could probably be sourced with less reliable sources than we would require...
Click to read more »anything that isn't is still unsourced. Looks to me like a failure of WP:ATT. GoodnightmushTalk 01:34, 27 April 2007 (UTC) AFAIK, "per nom" indicates...
Click to read more »edits made since then and infobox likely out of date. Completely fails WP:ATT, fails WP:NN, no assertion of notability, no reason to believe this article...
Click to read more »This page details a process used within WikiProject Scouting. Shortcut WP:S-ATTWP:S-ATT...
Click to read more »Delete - virtually empty, no assertion of notability, WP:NOT#IINFO, fails WP:ATT, WP:RS, WP:N, the usual. Moreschi Request a recording? 17:01, 29 March 2007...
Click to read more »your posts. FiggyBee 00:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, fails completely WP:ATT. --Tikiwont 11:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, unfunny hoax. Pavel Vozenilek...
Click to read more »article in Nationalencyklopedin, at Nordisk familjebok and books such as Att tolka Svitjod and sv:Svitjods undergång och Sveriges födelse, which are directly...
Click to read more »independent sources at all, and thus should be deleted because it fails WP:ATT and WP:N. Edison 16:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC) WP:PORNBIO is an established...
Click to read more »evidence provided that this article can be built on solid sources as WP:ATT asks us to do. Pascal.Tesson 22:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »blah 11:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC) As to the charges of violating WP:NOT, WP:ATT, and others, I find this article guilty on all counts. Delete EyeSereneTALK...
Click to read more »google and found one other source aside from the NyTeknik one (Drömmen om att ha roligt, 2009-01-21, TT Spektra) but it's mostly an interview. I did find...
Click to read more »--Selket Talk 07:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOT#IINFO, fails WP:ATT/WP:RS by a long way. Moreschi Request a recording? 13:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »attributed (confirmed through the use of reliable, published sources - WP:ATT proposed core policy merger). -- saberwyn 01:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC) Not...
Click to read more »more than another internet meme that lacks notability per WP:WEB, fails WP:ATT, could be called OR, yadda yadda. Arkyan • (talk) 19:03, 26 March 2007...
Click to read more »8 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, no sources given, no sources found, fails WP:ATT. Tikiwont 14:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:V, WP:BOLLOCKS and...
Click to read more »Thanks, Nick—Contact/Contribs 00:30, 11 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:ATT, as there are no sources to verify notability. Nor was there anything relevant...
Click to read more »resolution of the Commons discussion. --BDD (talk) 17:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC) C:ATT → Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages (links to redirect...
Click to read more »MSJapan 21:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - Article has serious issues with WP:ATT. Without citations to verify what it says much of this article has to count...
Click to read more »StuffOfInterest 22:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC) Weak Delete, for lack of WP:ATT and little hope of attaining it. For people who treat WP:N as policy: barely...
Click to read more ») 09:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Delete due to lack of sources to satisfy WP:ATT. Tram stops are no more inherently notable than mailboxes, especially future...
Click to read more »WegianWarrior 07:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - It definitely has problems with WP:ATT (which has relpaced WP:V and WP:OR) - There is not a single citation to show...
Click to read more »get-out-of-jail-free card for unsourced info. What part of WP:NOR and WP:ATT are people having problems with. No WP:RS, no info, no arguments. Simple...
Click to read more »was Delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:52, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Fails WP:HOAX, WP:ATT, WP:MUSIC and probably WP:BULLSHIT as well. An article created by a single-purpose...
Click to read more »added a Slate article. -- Whpq 17:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Keep. Passes WP:ATT now. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 10:01, 18 March 2007 (UTC) Keep per the coverage...
Click to read more »for his expertise, but I think we need to merge the history here per WP:ATT. --Doug Mehus T·C 23:57, 18 January 2020 (UTC) History merge with or redirect...
Click to read more »I'm uncertain whether a couple of the words may be proper nouns. Would "att" before the name of a person make sense, near the end of a message? --NorwegianBlue talk...
Click to read more »to grow, its like a spinning a spider webb, you dont get the whole webb att once. :) People will start contribution more and more to those as time goes...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete, only source cited is a blog, I can find no others. Fails WP:ATT (information based solely on an unreliable source). Seraphimblade Talk to...
Click to read more »is it - one out of a hundred thousand in the past year?) does not pass WP:ATT. --Charlene 02:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC) Comment millions of dollars for a TV...
Click to read more »exists and b) the club meets notability requirements. Have a read of WP:ATT for further details ChrisTheDude 10:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Comment. As described...
Click to read more »couple of reviews, but they can't be considered reliable. Delete per WP:ATT and WP:N-K@ngiemeep! 23:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »article is a hoax. Versageek 03:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC) Delete fails WP:ATT and WP:N, probably a WP:HOAX. Carlosguitar 04:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC) delete...
Click to read more »from the Baltic Sea 00:02, 12 March 2007 (UTC) Yeah, see, the thing is WP:ATT is policy. But I guess policy arguments don't actually matter. Otto4711 02:12...
Click to read more »fails WP:N though more importantly lacks any sources and does not satisfy WP:ATT. NOt to mention the fact that it is self-contradicting. Is it or is it not...
Click to read more »stands on its own, and nothing I can recognize as WP:RS is to be found for WP:ATT. Murghdisc. 13:57, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Delete, weakly. Agree with Murgh. Also...
Click to read more »modified, without any substantiation. It currently fails WP:N and WP:V (or WP:ATT) Tyrenius 21:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:CORP—no verifiable sources...
Click to read more »Chinese people. SISLEY 09:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC) Delete. This article fails WP:ATT, WP:NN, is just about the shortest possible stub, hasn't been touched in...
Click to read more »the article has been tagged as unreferenced since June 2006 (failing WP:ATT), and exists to define a term (failing WP:NOT#DICT). Due to the lack of suitable...
Click to read more »Delete - virtually empty, no assertion of notability, WP:NOT#IINFO, fails WP:ATT, WP:RS, WP:N, the usual. Moreschi Request a recording? 17:01, 29 March 2007...
Click to read more »(WP:AS) – Article size ATP (WP:ATP) – Attack page ATP – Article talk page ATT (WP:ATT) – Attribution Back to contents B (WP:B) – Bots BA (WP:BA) – List of...
Click to read more »some people but haven't been covered by reliable sources enough to meet WP:ATT. Can you show that any of the websites has a fact-checking staff and any...
Click to read more »sources, and are less likely to be "reliable" under the definition used in WP:ATT. If this musician's network is notable locally in Australia, please provide...
Click to read more »broadcasted on Atlantic Broadband (channel 80), and we will be on Comcast, ATT, Direct Tv and some OTT platfom soon. You can also check the website www...
Click to read more »could change my vote by someone who does. As is it fails WP:MUSIC and WP:ATT. NeoFreak 02:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC) Delete based on no reliable sources to...
Click to read more »things that have already gotten interest from third parties. Fails the WP:ATT and WP:N policies. --Charlene 10:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC) Delete The issue isn't...
Click to read more »Anyway, I believe this, and each of the following articles, do not meet WP:ATT or WP:MUSIC. Soldier Side (Showstoppa single) (edit | talk | history | protect |...
Click to read more »WP:WAF, WP:ATT... Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete — has no place on the encyclopedia per WP:NOT, WP:WAF, WP:ATT, and so...
Click to read more »Delete - virtually empty, no assertion of notability, WP:NOT#IINFO, fails WP:ATT, WP:RS, WP:N, the usual. Moreschi Request a recording? 17:02, 29 March 2007...
Click to read more »Delete - no references that support notability, and article does not meet WP:ATT. Fails two key Wikipedia policies - unless someone can produce references...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Non-Notable Schools. All Fail WP:NOTE, WP:SCHOOL, and WP:ATT. --TREYWiki 23:46, 12 May 2007 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related...
Click to read more »but that's for another time. Cruft-filled and bloated, fails WP:NOT, WP:ATT and whatever the game guidelines are that I simply cannot be bothered to...
Click to read more »of secondary coverage of it, its current incarnation appears to fail WP:ATT on original research grounds. Orderinchaos78 12:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »neither can I (outside of blogs and forums). This is clearly not enough for WP:ATT. Although I'm personally sympathetic to the inherent difficulties that prevent...
Click to read more »future product (WP:CRYSTAL) -- until it exist, and can be compliant with WP:ATT (no self-referencing/self-published sources), it doesn't merit inclusion...
Click to read more »Deranged bulbasaur 05:16, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per nominator (RS/ATT/N). /Blaxthos 09:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Weak keep Normally I'm very wary...
Click to read more »