This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
WP:ASSERTWP:ASSERT WP:ASFWP:ASF What is the difference between asserting a fact and asserting an opinion? The text of Wikipedia articles should assert facts...
Click to read more »"it is compelling" is not enough to assert something is relevant. Arguing "it is endangered" is not enough to assert something is relevant. Arguing "it...
Click to read more »of NPOV called "A simple formulation" said, "Assert facts, including facts about opinions—but don't assert opinions themselves." WP:MORALIZE, let the facts...
Click to read more »of NPOV called "A simple formulation" said, "Assert facts, including facts about opinions—but don't assert opinions themselves." WP:LTRD, Don't consider...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. —Nikki311 20:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC) Delete No notability asserted. The only reference is a link to the article itself, WP:V. ——Ryan | t •...
Click to read more »don't see how he is notable. The career section is lacking and doesn't assert notability. It doesn't talk about his training or anything like that. It...
Click to read more »WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC and/or WP:PORNBIO permitting. If an article does not assert or demonstrate notability, try to improve it by one of the following methods:...
Click to read more »fall within the scope of other extant projects, and will not attempt to assert any sort of control over them. We will however seek to add appropriate content...
Click to read more »"An article about a musician or music group that does not assert having released at least one album, nor having had media coverage, nor having...
Click to read more »clearly. Consider the following exceptionally short article: Notability is asserted, but what about context? How are we to know anything further about this...
Click to read more »endless "edit wars" in which one person asserts that p, whereupon the next person changes the text so that it asserts that not-p? A solution is that we accept...
Click to read more »discussions. —iMatthew 2008 16:03, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Comment If anything asserts notability for this wrestler, it is in this article. Is this sufficient...
Click to read more »self-editing and vanity page creation." Also, criterion A7, which deals with asserting notability, was expanded to include "companies" and "web sites, blogs...
Click to read more »that doesn't mean it can't be referenced. And this other article doesn't assert notability - that doesn't mean its subject isn't notable. So assume good...
Click to read more »truth. A long-standing summary of NPOV was "Assert facts, including facts about opinions—but don't assert opinions themselves.". A "fact" is something...
Click to read more »applied to controversial subjects or to living people, could be misused to assert a specific point of view. This essay has been drafted to provide some general...
Click to read more »To identify when perspectives and opinions in Wikipedia are asserted without stating whose they are, an [attribution needed] flag may be inserted. Example...
Click to read more »around a block of fellow administrator Hesperian by Physchim62. Other users assert that Physchim62 has misused his administrative tools in the past. John Buscema:...
Click to read more »independent sources, never mind any reliable ones. Also, article doesn't assert notability. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 23:28, 27 April 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom...
Click to read more »a "no consensus" edit summary is just plain lazy. A reverting editor asserting a lack of consensus has the responsibility to show a prior consensus or...
Click to read more »does not assert notability, or is unreferenced, it should be added to the category "Articles about to be deleted because they do not assert notability'...
Click to read more »watch. Useful ways to avoid advocacy include: Assert facts, including facts about opinions, but do not assert the opinions themselves. Attribute claims to...
Click to read more »translate or interpret (even incorrectly) as legal threats. For example, if you assert that another editor's comments are "defamatory" or "libelous", that editor...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Doesn't assert notability. Fails WP:BIO. No references provided. On the other side Contribs|@...
Click to read more »D-Generation X. I don't think anything can be done to this article to help it assert even a bit of notability. GaryColemanFan (talk) 03:07, 9 September 2009...
Click to read more »and psychoanalysis erroneously labeled a "science". The proposer further asserted that, in giving this guidance, Arbcom has exceeded its remit by straying...
Click to read more »Many articles assert notability by claiming that the subject has received an award. Oftentimes the award is also used in a secondary manner, with the award...
Click to read more »Cybercobra (talk) 23:51, 5 September 2009 (UTC) Delete - Article does not assert notability; google (web, book, scholar, and news) searches turn up no reliable...
Click to read more »improvement. There are still too many instances out there of editors trying to assert undue control over content, ignoring community consensus or process, or...
Click to read more »F.C. All players and managers associated with the club It also aims to assert notability to non-notable ones. Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Manchester...
Click to read more »important for editors who create articles to cite reliable sources and assert significance. However, newcomers often need help. Experienced Wikipedians...
Click to read more »public policy, is an actual virtue. To reject the advice of experts is to assert autonomy, a way for Americans to insulate their increasingly fragile egos...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:24, 6 August 2018 (UTC) What does "assert itself as" mean, as in the sentence "Seoul has asserted itself as a music hotspot."? Thank you! -- 14:54...
Click to read more »a website that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. An article about a company that does not assert the importance or significance...
Click to read more »explained. Note that none of these were nominated by admins. ...that does not assert significance Toddy Lee Matthew Wright (redirected since another person by...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Doesn't appear to assert independent notability, but there's clearly some material out there about...
Click to read more »Arbitration Committee were originally appointed by Wales, and he at one time asserted the right to overrule or even dissolve the Committee. When it was founded...
Click to read more »Negative claims are statements that assert the non-existence or exclusion of something. Negative claims are assumed to be true so long as no evidence is...
Click to read more »around a block of fellow administrator Hesperian by Physchim62. Other users assert that Physchim62 has misused his administrative tools in the past. A remedy...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) article fails to assert why this radio personality is notable. Lacks 3rd party verifiable references...
Click to read more »premier institutions on the West coast..." Assert facts, including facts about opinions, but do not assert the opinions themselves. Editors should not...
Click to read more »title isn't recognized. Comment Dream Focus, what links can you provide to assert that this event(s) are notable? A lot of wrestler have wrestled in front...
Click to read more »it makes sense for all editors to admit their own fallibility when they assert that they "know" something to be true. Don't report what you know (or think...
Click to read more »assistance. WikiProjects are not rule-making organizations, nor can they assert ownership of articles within a specific topic area. WikiProjects have no...
Click to read more »adhere to Wikipedia's policy on Verifiability; it is not enough to simply assert that a school meets a criterion without substantiating that claim with reliable...
Click to read more »the photograph, and the actual art itself. The Reiss Engelhorn Museum asserts that copyright applies to these particular images because the museum hired...
Click to read more »one of many schools added by same user without any sort of notability asserted. Seinfreak37 14:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Delete and Merge pertinent information...
Click to read more »such a biography should assert the character's fictionality in their biography and should not be written in a manner that asserts that the events happened...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This program does not assert any sort of notability. The details are extremely trivial and the most the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's rules, such as major newspaper and peer-reviewed scholarly journals, assert that they have a neutral stance. Despite these protestations of neutrality...
Click to read more »Japanese ones, to be more precise). I'm not really sure if this is enough to assert notability per WP:BIO and WP:ENTERTAINER, considering that the basic assertion...
Click to read more »possible to locate any and all information. However, Pokémon contributors assert that an encyclopedic article can be written about any Pokémon, and have...
Click to read more »with the recent changes. iMatthew 20:51, 13 January 2008 (UTC) Keep - asserts notability. D.M.N. (talk) 18:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC) Keep - Information...
Click to read more »are all from Wikipedia pages, not reliable third party sources. Does not assert notability. William Adama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...
Click to read more »Speedy Delete Article does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. CSD A7. It would be impossible to assert a subject's importance if it's...
Click to read more »outlining its interpretation and advice on that tension. The statement asserted that the WMF's role is merely advisory; it also clarified that the privacy...
Click to read more »applied to controversial subjects or to living people, could be misused to assert a specific point of view. This guideline has been drafted to provide some...
Click to read more »the websites like YouTube, Dailymotion, etc. (DarkSword) Delete doesn't assert notability per WP:NSONGS, no coverage in reliable sources (YouTube and Dailymotion...
Click to read more »reliable potential sources) agree with their word preferences, and they assert that this policy compels us to do likewise. This misleadingly elevates that...
Click to read more »the reasonability rule as it would be unreasonable for the community to assert consensus when none is present. Unfortunately, instances of editors violating...
Click to read more »by the Huffington Post's United Kingdom edition, writer Thomas Church asserts that the new VisualEditor will change history, literally. It says that...
Click to read more »one of the following options or similar: Oppose / Retain / No action - to assert that removal of adminship would be inappropriate in this instance. Advise...
Click to read more »04:42:39 (UTC): w:ko:User:애콜라이트 (t - c; 0) to w:ko:Assert.h (diff !top) - Link: c-p-p.net/c/assert.h/assert (R/Xmeta/L) 2016-12-05 06:57:17 (UTC): User Ramaksoud2000...
Click to read more »international system, disagreement persists over the nature of TNGO influence. Some assert that TNGOs are agents of change that use norms and ideas to transform world...
Click to read more »uninhabited islands are under the control of Japan, but China and Taiwan are asserting rival territorial claims. Tensions have risen of late—and not just in...
Click to read more »does automatically assert notability, thus why it should never have been a CSD candidate. THere is a distinction between asserting some sort of notability...
Click to read more »Special:MergeAccount. (bug 14300http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14300) The &assert= parameter now works on the API, as well as for normal edits. (r35472, bug...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was delete. Agree that there is nothing to assert the notability of this one episode in particular. As Hammersoft says, the...
Click to read more »Click here to view results "An article about a real person that does not assert that person's importance or significance - people such as college professors...
Click to read more »tendentious texts. For example, if the vast majority of reputable sources assert that there is no life on Mars and an article in a single journal by Dr....
Click to read more »Dbromage [Talk] 04:17, 20 August 2007 (UTC) Assert notability or delete - The article itself doesn't assert notability (from what I see). If Bridgeplayer...
Click to read more »but being a member of a professional football club is definately an assertation of importance/significance. Also there are likely hundreds of articles...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unremarkable film. Fails WP:GNG. Article does not assert notability. — Richard BB 10:56, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »applies in disagreements and arguments, both to content and sources. Asserting something without explanation or demonstration is known as an empty assertion...
Click to read more »the show, no notability asserted. Joshua Peacock - 3 hits on Google News, all in passing, 5 years old, no notability asserted. Amber Kalirai - 3 hits...
Click to read more »adhere to Wikipedia's policy on verifiability; it is not enough to simply assert that a play meets a criterion without substantiating that claim with reliable...
Click to read more »This allows people to check your facts with Find a Grave, but does not assert that the fact has a reliable source. If you don't enter any material, or...
Click to read more »two bilateral agreements exist, one cannot assert that this relationship will never likely be able to assert notability in the future. Wikipedia's policy...
Click to read more »2011 deleted page Instagram (Speedy deleted, importance/significance not asserted.) iPhone 04:11, 6 December 2006 deleted page IPhone (still rumored, improper...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Delete did not assert notability, in addition to COI, SOCK & other concerns. SkierRMH (talk) 20:47...
Click to read more »to assert notability, a good copyedit, and a general clean up. List of Mega Man characters – As a recent merge target, it needs sources to assert notability...
Click to read more »self promotional autobiography, poorly formatted unreferenced does not assert notability Troyster87 (talk) 02:11, 2 March 2009 (UTC) Keep and tag for...
Click to read more »lacking sufficient context, articles in defined areas that do not credibly assert the importance of the topic, and pages on topics already covered under another...
Click to read more »result was delete. Article at the moment fails to assert WP:GNG. No prejudice to recreation if it can assert any kind of notability. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk)...
Click to read more »TWL) Was prodded with the following rationale: "Unsourced, importance not asserted, could not find sources that cover the subject in any depth." Can't add...
Click to read more »I'm disappointed that no-one chose to discuss the fact that the article assert that the artist has three or four albums on a label called Bite Records...
Click to read more »of self-proclaimed experts who cannot produce their sources, trying to assert their own authority instead, which is equivalent to original research. The...
Click to read more »page to assert that notability. One sentence, a couple of external links, an infobox and an author's link does not feel suficient to assert notability...
Click to read more »Driven by "Wikipedia's purpose" and " What is an article?", separatist assert that stand-alone articles are easier to find for our readership and will...
Click to read more »Fails WP:WEB. Very few independent references. Article does not really assert notability and seems to verge on violation of WP:Spam. Hatch68 17:51, 2...
Click to read more »Mediran talk|contribs 05:06, 26 October 2012 (UTC) Comment the article doesn't assert its significance at all, I think it should be tagged with speedy deletion...
Click to read more »21:03, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Delete Fails to assert notability. if genuine sources were added which asserted notability, then it should be merged with main...
Click to read more »important enough to be included in an encyclopedia? Notability must be asserted bluntly and definitively. The best way to accomplish this is to back up...
Click to read more »assert notability strongly enough (which can and should be fixed). Bfigura (talk) 02:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC) What's up with this rash of "asserting...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Article does not assert notability. The references for this article do not qualify as WP:RS as most...
Click to read more »adhere to Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. It is not enough to simply assert that a book meets a criterion. Verifiable reliable sources that substantiate...
Click to read more »essential to communities and masses of individuals in their own way. It is asserted that the articles have a right to exist, even if they are not the "subject...
Click to read more »might be intrigued, but the things you assert are the same things that disruptive editors have tried to assert at this site since its inception. It appears...
Click to read more »should be given. A single local newspaper article is probably not enough to assert notability, but national mention with some details or multiple local sources...
Click to read more »unreferenced, does not assert notability. Girolamo Savonarola 05:49, 20 October 2007 (UTC) Delete -- a future film, no sources asserting the production itself...
Click to read more »have been involved in. —mako๛ 03:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Weak keep as it asserts notability, and he seems notable from the text, but has some unverified...
Click to read more »--Dhartung | Talk 01:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC) Delete: article fails to assert any notability WP:N about the website and appears to have been written as...
Click to read more »among some of the other 16,500 results on a google search) is enough to assert notability. Heck Flex magazine even ran stories about her workout routine...
Click to read more »thinks that notability is asserted. -- RHaworth 05:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC) Delete Where in the article is notability asserted? This is borderline speedy...
Click to read more »does appear to have sources and assert notability. Edward321 02:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Keep. The article asserts notability, and it has at least...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete No WP:RS, does not assert WP:N, not notable Bstone (talk) 17:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC) Keep. The article...
Click to read more »14th and 15th centuries, geo-political forces at work elsewhere began to assert their influence in European affairs beginning with the Crusades, which had...
Click to read more »sources about this topic. In fact, I believe that the company does not assert notability and fails A7. The speedy was declined by Protonk (talk · contribs)...
Click to read more »themselves. This applies both to experts and to house cleaners, editors who assert facts and editors who check facts. Appeal to emotion Appeal to spite I-message...
Click to read more »does not assert its importance. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 01:14, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete Delete. Not only does it not assert notability-...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) No assertation of notability. Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro Wrestling...
Click to read more »views) (delete) – (View log) unreferences article on article that does not assert notability SuperSuperBoi (talk) 06:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC) Weak delete Well...
Click to read more »to assert notability, could be speedied. Henning Makholm 17:14, 19 March 2006 (UTC) Week keep. Nominator has repeatedly reverted attempts to assert notability...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn - notability asserted (non-admin closure) Off2riorob (talk) 23:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC) Desmond...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - spammy, fails to assert notability. MER-C 05:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC) Delete. Doesn't attempt to assert notability. — Saxifrage ✎ 07:47...
Click to read more »of Florida. Article fails to assert notability. Included references that mention the subject's work also fail to assert notability. Millbrooky (talk)...
Click to read more »correct for that article. To pick an alphabetic sequence of articles and assert that none of them can be referenced is wanton destruction. DGG (talk) 00:26...
Click to read more »delete. The "keep" opinions assert that sources exist, but do not cite them, which makes it impossible to assess the asserted notability of the topic. Sandstein...
Click to read more »extensive and collaborative edit histories. For example, drive-by editors who assert sexual orientation without support should not be extended the same benefit...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Language/2018 August 5 Why Mien Language never heard of assert itself as Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Language/2018 August 6 Arabic...
Click to read more »PROD, article does not assert notability. — xaosflux Talk 13:53, 23 December 2014 (UTC) Delete - IMDB is not enough to assert notability. Not enough worthwhile...
Click to read more »the many thousands of TV stations around the world. Unless notability is asserted, we can't have a list of everyone of them. Article was PRODded and an IP...
Click to read more »article reads like a "what is happening this weekend" deal, which doesn't assert notability. The second one, I'll give you because it gives a little more...
Click to read more »Is asserting non-notability notable? I think not. --Xcali 03:05, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) Delete. Is not asserting non-notability non-notable assertably? --Barfooz...
Click to read more »sources to assert that this film passes GNG or Wikipedia:Notability (films). Although there may be Indonesian language references that could assert notability...
Click to read more »or aren't possible. Can notability be asserted? Did you attempt to find sources? Just because it doesn't assert notability now, doesn't mean adding one...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) This article is completely unsourced and does not assert notability nor provide any reliable sources or any sources at all. This...
Click to read more »Ragab and Ahmad Ragab don't seem to bring anything significative... I can't assert any notability so I bring this article to AfD. This article was tagged as...
Click to read more »middle school which does not have any notability nor those sources that assert it. Delete JForget 02:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Lots of edits -...
Click to read more »disputed as a speedy delete, but there is really nothing in this article that asserts any importance or significance. Google gets 128 hits, few of which are...
Click to read more »meet WP:BAND. Evil saltine (talk) 22:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC) A7 Doesn't assert notability. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters •...
Click to read more »closure). Article was speedily deleted per CSD A7 by Aleta because it didn't assert the importance or significance of the subject. WilliamH (talk) 12:06, 1...
Click to read more »log) Notability not asserted. —« ANIMUM » 15:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC) Delete, possibly even A7. Not even a single source, doesn't assert notability. Melsaran...
Click to read more »uploads | upload log). Unused image, lacking a description, Image does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)...
Click to read more »remarks which insinuate misconduct on the part of others without actually asserting it openly. He has also made on-wiki allegations that other editors may...
Click to read more »claims that the AGC is an extraterrestrial organisation, whose existence is asserted by certain people. To make such a claim, it must be backed up with verifiable...
Click to read more »existed for just five years locally, and the external links do nothing to assert true notability. Shalom Hello 02:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Delete There doesn't...
Click to read more »especially among Facebook users, and the article needs to be improved to assert notability, by introducing sources and related collateral. Reyrefran (talk)...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) An unsourced article describing a drinking game. It doesn't assert any notability. Prod was removed without comment. I am also nominating the...
Click to read more »WP:CORP and WP:MUSIC. Non notable artists. No third party links. Nothing to assert notability. Undeath (talk) 17:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) An online video game. Doesn't assert notability, and doesn't appear to meet our notability standards. Lawrence...
Click to read more »speedy delete under A7 speedy criterion. Specifically, the website doesn't assert any real notability. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 02:01, 31 August...
Click to read more »administrator Physchim62's block of fellow administrator Hesperian. Other users asserted that Physchim62 had misused his administrative tools in the past. After...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) Contested PROD - Wife of rapper Snoop Dogg. Does not assert individual notability; Par the guidelines related people should be included...
Click to read more »(B), and then arrived at a synthesis (A+B=C), in which the editor would assert that the company had violated its mission statement. Only an independent...
Click to read more »(UTC) Neither of those are reasons to delete. But the article fails to assert notability, which gets into the realm of speedy-deletion. Needs minimal...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Biologycruft of a mammal that doesn't assert notability beyond that it used to exist. Voretus (talk) 12:54, 22 May 2008...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete, asserts no notability. Sr13 is almost Singularity 04:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »was caught in the middle. Again it doesn't assert the 700 as notable. [8] is the only article that asserts the 700 as a notable route - but it's an opinion...
Click to read more »—Twenty Years 15:41, 21 October 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete as the article asserts no notability. CRGreathouse (t | c) 18:09, 21 October 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 21:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC) A7 Doesn't assert notability. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Non-notable school, does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. Seinfreak37 15:19, 21 February...
Click to read more »specific fictional Pokémon species were merged into lists of Pokémon. It asserted that an article on a subject should be kept because it was at least as...
Click to read more »WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. Fails to assert notability per WP:BIO Gordonofcartoon 03:52, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Speedy Delete Article doesn't even assert notability. faithless...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) does not assert notability. Article provides no third party sources asserting notability βcommand 01:18, 2 July 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Does not assert notability with reliable sources, and is part of a flood of articles created...
Click to read more »PROD removed without addressing notability concerns. Article does not even assert notability. Pontificalibus (talk) 21:08, 14 June 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »(talk) 14:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC) Delete The only third-party source does not assert Notability. Boardgamegeek is a self-proclaimed "database" of board games...
Click to read more »an article that is not about the subject. Does not assert notability. newsweek.com: Does not assert notability.Very fleeting mention in a very long and...
Click to read more »Doesn't assert notability. --On the other side Contribs|@ 15:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Delete Completely notable - no references to assert notability...
Click to read more »made changes due to Wikipedia, including a 2005 report from Nature that asserted Wikipedia is almost as reliable as Britannica in terms of accuracy despite...
Click to read more »nom. Punkmorten 09:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC) Delete This school fails to assert notability. It is also difficult to verify the contents of this article...
Click to read more »talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Does not assert notability standard of WP:CORP ~ BigrTex 21:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC) Comment...
Click to read more »of coverage, but barely any about the man. Fails to assert WP:BIO and subsequently fails to assert TRUE for WP:GNG. scope_creep (talk) 19:19, 8 January...
Click to read more »rather informal "Although he asserted that he did not know what devout Muslims would think of Holland's arguments, he did assert that they did not have "a...
Click to read more »have copyright to a film. That publishers assert copyright on their own suggests that the hospital did not assert copyright, so we have that as a pretty...
Click to read more »non-notable wrestler. JuJube 01:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC) Delete Notability not asserted. --Charlene 02:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC) Speedy Close - This article was...
Click to read more »contribs) who said that it wasn't a candidate - I don't see how the page asserts, let alone establishes notability, but since she suggested this venue,...
Click to read more »adhere to Wikipedia's policy on attribution; it is not enough to simply assert that an article meets a criterion without substantiating that claim with...
Click to read more »specifically, an editor's use of the term listcruft generally indicates they are asserting that one or more of the following are true: The list is of interest to...
Click to read more »– (View log) Notability not asserted or evident Decoratrix 17:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC) Strong Keep Notability not asserted? Played at the highest level...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) The IRC client does not assert notability (has not been mentioned in any reliable sources). Searches on...
Click to read more »Fails WP:NF and does not assert notability. Girolamo Savonarola 03:41, 17 October 2007 (UTC) Delete as the article does not assert the topic's notability...
Click to read more »creator (who seems to be a SPA) made no effort to assert notability simply because there isn't any to assert. Google finds only 6 hits for this book [1] under...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result of the debate was delete per failure to assert notability. —Cleared as filed. 04:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC) A pointless...
Click to read more »close-to-notable among the movies is Shadows of the Mind—the article doesn't assert it, but IMDb notes that it won an award at a film festival, but not clear...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No reliable sources to assert notability. Gaura79 (talk) 11:57, 22 October 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »organization in the article. Añoranza: A case involving Añoranza. Users asserted that Añoranza had been incivil, and had filed a retaliatory request for...
Click to read more »enough to make unsourced or poorly sourced claims in the article, or to assert a band's importance on a talk page or AfD page – the article itself must...
Click to read more »previously speedied as advertisement. Does not assert notability. Could not find any sources that assert notability. Fails WP:ANYBIO criteria. -- œ™ 02:11...
Click to read more »isn't deleted. Hello32020 19:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC) Delete Fails to assert notability. Not even encyclopedic.--Húsönd 19:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Article does not assert notability. As an aside, the article has also been unreferenced since November...
Click to read more »legs. Many of the most dedicated proponents of the five-leg school will assert that fivelegism is as valid a view as fourlegism, and that fourlegism is...
Click to read more »by many editors for keeping it."[78] (2) "Revert per WP:BRD. No one has asserted there is consensus to remove this longstanding image. Many reasons were...
Click to read more »assert notability. Don't understand how this can be considered fancruft though Ydam 12:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete. Bio that does not assert...
Click to read more »country's equivalent of a "major film studio". Articles on such a film should assert that the film in question was notable for something more than merely having...
Click to read more »find any reliable sources to assert notability. Chzz ► 10:16, 8 May 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete, the article doesn't assert notability and neither does...
Click to read more »album, which is enough to assert notability. It's not exactly the in-depth coverage that I typically like, but it's enough to assert notability for NALBUMS...
Click to read more »generally by showing a positive record of actions and attitude. Don't just assert that you'll find the tool useful; give evidence of why you need the tool...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Delete: Article does not nearly assert notability as it stands now. I had speedied the article but restored it...
Click to read more »withdrawn; Nomination for article was based on this state, but creator quickly asserted notability after AFD warning. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 19:46, 7 December...
Click to read more »Delete. Doesn't seem to assert notability. If the Obazo National Convention is that assertion, then there is no notability to assert. 9Nak (talk) 15:21, 7...
Click to read more »kneejerk (the mass keep votes suggest that), and focus on the part where you assert notability. ++Lar: t/c 02:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC) Delete as unsourced...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Article does not assert why exactly the individual is notable. Also, sources cannot be verified...
Click to read more »guideline of independent coverage in reliable sources. No references exist to assert notability. Only sources about Ultima games in general. Thus fails WP:N...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete a7, does not assert notability. NawlinWiki 15:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC) Irish-American Student...
Click to read more »nonsense, does not assert significance of subjectGrzond 13:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete mostly nonsense, doesn't assert notability unless you...
Click to read more »contains no sources and has been tagged as such since January 2007. Doesn't assert notability. Seems to be entirely Original Research. Pdelongchamp (talk)...
Click to read more »assert notability. Sr13 (T|C) 09:26, 31 December 2006 (UTC) It's a song. Asserting notability is irrelevant for songs. And whether an article asserts...
Click to read more »Keep revissed article. DES (talk) 06:47, 21 August 2005 (UTC) Article asserts notability, although it is highly questionable. Still, it may fall under...
Click to read more »pablo :: ... hablo ... 08:35, 15 July 2007 (UTC) Delete. The article "does not assert the importance or significance of its subject". The subject of the article...
Click to read more »Image:1567051 101.jpeg.gif (history · last edit) from [unknown]; User does not assert authorship; image seems like a copyvio and user has had many previous problems...
Click to read more »Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as importance or significance not asserted Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion Wikipedia:Field guide to proper...
Click to read more »Delete for failure to assert notability. Biruitorul (talk) 15:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC) Comment - The article itself might fail to assert notability, but this...
Click to read more »about schools without having to assert any special notability. Kappa 23:35, 14 October 2005 (UTC) keep please it does assert notability it is an article about...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Non notable? Doesn't assert notability at any rate, nor does it seem particularly special. Chase me...
Click to read more »(View log) Apparently unremarkable or non-existent. No sources available to assert notability. Contested prod. BradV 06:41, 25 November 2008 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »answer a question, you must allow others to do so. By asking a question you assert that others have the right to ask questions. If you assume that you should...
Click to read more »but it is incorrect to assert that it does not encourage attribution. All it says on this matter is that we should (1) assert facts, but not opinions;...
Click to read more »March 2006 (UTC) A Brazilian craftsman. No notability evident or even asserted, so could even be speedied. However, it's a contested PROD, so let's hear...
Click to read more »removed a speedy tag yesterday ([1]) with the comment, "asserts importance. May or may not be, but asserts it, so not a speedy." That's why we have to go through...
Click to read more »was "Does not assert notability under WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN". The prod was then removed, with the explanation "certainly does assert notability - says...
Click to read more »nominator asserts that this page falls under the no idiosyncratic non-topics section of the deletion policy. {{vfd-int}}: The nominator asserts that the...
Click to read more »middle schoolers should be notable. The article fails to assert the notability. If redrafted to assert notability then it should remain Fiddle Faddle 06:42...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Biography of journalist which doesn't assert notability according to WP:GNG. I have only been able to locate this reference...
Click to read more »is listed now. DumbBOT 12:11, 29 September 2006 (UTC) Delete - fails to assert notability. Feel free to speedy it when CSD A7 is expanded. MER-C 12:29...
Click to read more »asserts that it is not various things, but it does not assert that it is not the yellow pages. Fg2 01:52, 22 April 2006 (UTC) Comment It does assert that...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (added by closing admin) Clearly does not assert notability, and is defiantly not in the tone expected of an encyclopedia...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Does not assert notability of the magazine - tagged for notability for past month. Article...
Click to read more »Wikipedia's General Notability Guideline. No reliable third-party sources to assert notability within the article, or were found via web search or news archive...
Click to read more »this page. The result was Speedy delete a7, no longer an ad, but doesn't assert notability. NawlinWiki 03:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC) Farsipraise (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »doesn't mean what you think it means, Vizzini ... to assert something, you actually do have to assert it; it can't be inferred from another statement. So...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) No reliable sources to assert notability, seems to be solely original research Sceptre (talk) 13:33, 12...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't assert why the subject is notable or suitable for inclusion Mifter (talk) 18:19...
Click to read more »app is notable. Reviews must be significant, from a reliable source, or assert notability. Common sense and an awareness of historical context should be...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) This doesn't assert notability independent of the main article. The only thing that could potentially assert notability is the character's...
Click to read more »show, high notability asserted, stub class information. Molly Compton -- 0 hits on Google, 3 years on show, high notability asserted, deletion has been considered...
Click to read more »--Zoupan 15:13, 19 February 2015 (UTC) Speedy Delete: A7 for failure to assert a claim of notability. I'm not opposed to userfying it pending Zoupan actually...
Click to read more »Lordjeff06 (talk) 17:02, 25 February 2008 (UTC) SD per A7, definitely. Does not assert importance. Wisdom89 (T / C) 17:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »WP:ATT is not everywhere verbally identical with its sources. Its supporters assert it makes no changes in policy, but is better phrased. [You can vote any...
Click to read more »assert the notability of the subject Fritzpoll (talk) 17:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC) Delete This opinion poll does not appear to have sources that assert...
Click to read more »15:42, 22 May 2010 (UTC) Delete I had a hard time determining if this asserted notability, mainly because I'm still not sure if the article is about a...
Click to read more »for deletion too if editors don't assert notability soon. Mereda 13:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC) Delete. Does not assert meeting WP:MUSIC. Vegaswikian 17:26...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was SPEEDY DELETE as notability was not asserted. But|seriously|folks 06:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC) Black Horse (edit |...
Click to read more »you came across the deletion discussion, if not (as my "bizarre theory" asserts) through your ongoing monitoring of WMC's talk page. A pattern of conduct...
Click to read more »(such as Wikipedia) and perform operations on them. assert / assertion Usually refers to mw:API:Assert, used to ensure a bot only edits while logged in....
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (added by closing admin) Does not assert notability; copyvio (text copied from [1]); probably spam. Schneelocke 14:25...
Click to read more »(fuddle me!) 17:29, 29 November 2005 (UTC) Does not meet WP:MUSIC, does not assert notability. Possible vanity page. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 17:23, 29 November 2005...
Click to read more »guideline while violating its spirit or underlying principles. Sometimes they assert that the technical interpretation of the policies and guidelines should...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was keep. Now referenced and asserts notability seicer | talk | contribs 16:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC) Birmingham...
Click to read more »are in the evidence phase. Añoranza: A case involving Añoranza. Users asserted that Añoranza had been incivil, and had filed a retaliatory request for...
Click to read more »20:55, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete all Absolutely no notability is asserted, partly because there's no notability to be found. Albums by non-notable...
Click to read more »unless notability is asserted before AFD closes. I also propose that Ali Kazmi be included in this AFD, since his article does not assert any notability outside...
Click to read more »(talk) 11:16, 18 April 2008 (UTC) Delete - unsourced article that doesn't assert notability. -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 12:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC) Delete as...
Click to read more »(View log) This is just a one sentence episode stub. Notability is not asserted or established. TTN (talk) 00:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC) I am also nominating...
Click to read more »04:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC) Delete. Doesn't attempt to assert notability, and I can't find a way to assert that for it. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:17...
Click to read more »since it doesn't even try to assert the subject's importance, and if the person who created the article can't assert it, no one else probably can either...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nothing to assert notability of this particular product. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 00:38, 14 September...
Click to read more »June 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:N, as notability is not even asserted, and WP:V, as no asserted facts are cited to WP:RS. It can always be re-created if someone...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC) Delete No multiple, reliable sources that assert this competition apart from the official websites. Spellcast 17:58, 5 August...
Click to read more »(talk) 02:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC) A7 Not even close to meeting WP:MUSIC. No assertation whatsoever. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter...
Click to read more »Bridger), would be kind enough to actually add the sources to the article that assert (reliably) that she has "often been cited", I would be happy to withdraw...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Fails N and no sources exist. Does not assert notability, nor could it ever credibly assert it right now. Whatever 'sources' exist for this person...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) Non-notable company, per WP:ORG. Does not assert notability. Reads like an advertisement of sorts. thadius856talk|airports|neutrality...
Click to read more »"sport"), most of the article reads like the back of a trading card. He is asserted to have been involved with a somewhat high profile arrest, but even if...
Click to read more »log) Appears to be a very ordinary school, notability not meaningfully asserted, no third party sources other than a Govt report. Ohconfucius 09:48, 6...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Speedy delete a7, does not assert notability. NawlinWiki 19:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Taffi Rosen (edit |...
Click to read more »Fails WP:BIO. Arguably the article doesn't assert importance because there is, as of yet, no importance to assert. RayTalk 22:06, 8 October 2010 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was Speedy deleted under A7 (fails to assert notability). ★MESSEDROCKER★ 14:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC) Asia Exhibition...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Article does not assert notability. Autobiography. pppswing 01:44, 17 August 2007 (UTC) Delete Does...
Click to read more » The result was nomination withdrawn. Sufficient notability has been asserted. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) (receiver, archives) 21:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Does not assert notability. Crabapplecove 21:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC) Speedily Delete Article about a club that does not attempt to assert its notability...
Click to read more »notable and should have their own articles. It is, however, important to assert each highway's individual notability (historical significance, press coverage...
Click to read more »here instead of speedying it for several reasons: (1) the church doesn't assert copyright on its website, (2) on the expectation that an inexperienced user...
Click to read more »log) google and google news searches return hits, however none seem to assert any notability. Yes, the fair has attracted a number of name performers...
Click to read more »fails to produce in-depth established media coverage or reliable sources to assert notability per WP:ORG. Further research has remained unproductive. Kudpung...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:WEB does not assert the notability of WeekendScout.com and even if it did, it would fail WP:NOTINHERITED...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. However, by asserting how non-notable this 15-minute famer is, it actually seems to assert some notability. Boarderline {{db-attack}}...
Click to read more »nom was declined by DGG (talk · contribs) because the article "seems to assert notabity" (edit summary). I contest this. Two publications were deemed notable...
Click to read more »sources found. Freefall + webcomic on Gnews turns up absolutely nothing. Asserts notability with one Web Cartoonist's Choice award, but that alone is insufficient...
Click to read more »this page. The result was speedy redirected since band article does not assert notability. the wub "?!" 13:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC) No Quarter (edit |...
Click to read more »content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. -Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 00:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC) It asserts it, though I strongly...
Click to read more »Notability not asserted (subject of a prank call - how is that notable for an encyclopedia article?). Cannot find enough Ghits to even assert that the call...
Click to read more »January 2006 (UTC) This was tagged for speedy deletion as a bio that doesn't assert notability (WP:CSD#A7). I don't agree with that, so I'm listing it here...
Click to read more »support of three arbitrators. Añoranza: A case involving Añoranza. Users asserted that Añoranza had been incivil, and had filed a retaliatory request for...
Click to read more »(View log) Does not assert notability RogueNinjatalk 15:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC) Strong Keep A gazetted National Monument does not assert notability? This...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Totally non-notable by not asserting its notability. Removal of PROD was just an unexplained one by the creator...
Click to read more »notability asserted. Previous prod was contested, hence this nomination. BPMullins | Talk 03:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC) Speedy Delete per A7 - does not assert notability...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A poor article without sources to assert notability or even an attempt to assert notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 08:03, 20 January 2011...
Click to read more »(View log) This is a short stub about a local office complex. It does not assert notability (compare with the rejected guideline of WP:MALL). Shalom (Hello...
Click to read more »to/remove this from this article, it is vandalism." "You are trying to assert ownership of this article." "This must be a sock puppet account." "You obviously...
Click to read more »exercising Your rights under this License, You may not implicitly or explicitly assert or imply any connection with, sponsorship or endorsement by the Original...
Click to read more »about an artist, does not assert importance. — BRIAN0918 • 2006-09-21 08:08Z Speedy delete - CSD:A7 no notability asserted. Thryduulf 09:58, 21 September...
Click to read more »notability. Carlossuarez46 20:59, 20 October 2007 (UTC) Delete Nothing to assert notability, nor any real evidence of significant third-party coverage. Tx17777...
Click to read more »debate was speedy delete. Royboycrashfan 01:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC) fails to assert notability, vanity page? Almost no information. Adambiswanger1 01:06, 6...
Click to read more »February 2008 (UTC) Close to the margins of speedyable, it does (just) assert notability by the mention of the MC. Not enough information to avoid deletion...
Click to read more »does not assert notability. Crabapplecove 21:29, 1 August 2006 (UTC) Speedily Delete Article about a club that does not attempt to assert its notability...
Click to read more »Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC) Article about a website that does not assert notability. MER-C 11:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as per nom. Onebravemonkey...
Click to read more »7 March 2006 (UTC) Vanity article, created by User:Mikeabundo. Barely asserts notability. Coffee 10:30, 28 February 2006 (UTC) Delete or userify. Google...
Click to read more »test_format_days() { assert_eq!("33 years and 300 days", &format_days(12345)); assert_eq!("1 year and 2 days", &format_days(367)); assert_eq!("1 year and 1...
Click to read more »result of the debate was keep all. --Ezeu 04:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Does not assert sufficient notability. Whether the band is actually sufficiently notable...
Click to read more »role as nominator to review the subject; it's the role of the editors to assert notability and provide some references. The article as it was when I tagged...
Click to read more »reliable source. If meeting of the GNG is the sole reason being used to assert a notability, then yes... those sources being used for showing notability...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) PROD'ed, does not assert notability. Shawnc (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC) Delete Doesn't assert notability in any way; hasn't received...
Click to read more »BOVINEBOY2008 :) 00:58, 26 February 2010 (UTC) Delete Article does not assert the subject's notability. RadManCF (talk) 01:13, 26 February 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »alternative formulation of the non-bias policy: assert facts, including facts about opinions — but don't assert opinions themselves. There is a difference...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) Speedy Delete A7 - this article about an organisation does not assert notability. Nothing here lifts it above WP:MILL. (I realise the speedy delete...
Click to read more »TWL) There is no reliable third person information to assert notability and does not pertain to assert notability Dwanyewest (talk) 20:48, 28 August 2010...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails to assert notability. A google search for "Flapper! Francoeur" (the composer's last...
Click to read more »article that doesn't assert notabilityRackabello 06:47, 30 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:N (notability not shown) and WP:V (no asserted facts are cited to...
Click to read more »faction renewed support in faculties worldwide. Apple representatives have asserted in response that these allegations are nothing more than an Orangist smear...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Non-notable bus company - fails to assert notability of any kind. TheIslander 00:26, 18 August 2007 (UTC) Weak keep...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Article does not assert notability. Musical has achieved no professional performances. — MusicMaker...
Click to read more »--Pjacobi 20:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Delete Fails to assert notability. scope_creep Delete Fails to assert notability. --A. B. 06:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »"Speedy deleted per CSD A7, was an article about a real person that didn't assert the importance or significance of its subject." Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBriTalk...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Does not assert notability. Prior to my wiki-bonked episode, I expressed notability concern...
Click to read more »views) (delete) – (View log) Contested prod. Musical group that does not assert notability per WP:BAND - no coverage, no albums released yet, no charting...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Does not assert notability. Delete. Horselover Frost (talk) 00:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Notability not asserted, sources are suspect. Reads like a "biography" for the band by one of its...
Click to read more »IMDB, seems to fail general notability guidelines, and specially fails to assert WP:BIO and WP:NACTOR. On the few films, on which she get a listing, she...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete. Fails to assert any notability. Vegaswikian 06:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC) Keep as rewritten, manages to assert notability now while attributing...
Click to read more »and this article seems to assert some. - Rjd0060 05:03, 20 October 2007 (UTC) Weak keep There is some notability asserted, but sourced only by one memorial...
Click to read more »bible camps. SirNuke 22:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete, does not assert notability. A quick google turns up only a bunch of wikipedia mirrors, as...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) This article does not assert notability and contains no reliable references. It would also be easier...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete Not enough to assert notability. Fails WP:V. Caknuck 15:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC) Delete Doesn't assert notability; fails WP:V. Hello32020...
Click to read more »ie generated by them - or only a mention in passing. Ways for a band to assert notability: Bands that have spent time in Grade 1 at any point in history...
Click to read more »June 2007 (UTC) Delete No assertation of Notability. -- Rehnn83 Talk 15:27, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Speedy D - Does not assert notability - fails to meet...
Click to read more »(explicitly) provide adequate context for the subject, does not (explicitly) assert notability, and is not written in prose. ( If the context and notability...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails to assert notability, not appropriate for a speedy deletion --RedHillian | Talk 20:58...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result was Speedy delete (A7 - band that fails to assert notability) by Orangemike.. Nonadmin close. Xymmax So let it be written...
Click to read more »the band and their work seems to be real, but I can't find anything to assert that "Talk About"/"Fenix" was a hit. I would say it fails WP:MUSIC. Lankiveil...
Click to read more »sufficiently notable, so I prodded. Deprodded by anon without comment accept to assert the right to do so on several PRODS. 34 UNIQUE Google hits. I still doubt...
Click to read more »for being an article about a real person or group of people that doesn't assert the importance of the subject. Articles not meeting the criteria for speedy...
Click to read more »log) This article does assert that the subject has won 'teacher of the year 2008' in his region, meaning that the article does assert notability. However...
Click to read more »band article would have been subject to speedy deletion for failing to assert notability. NawlinWiki 17:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Rockmelon (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »article advertises a Christian school and gives external links, but does not assert notability and does not address the topic from a neutral point of view....
Click to read more »page. The result was Speedy delete (A7 - group for which no notability asserted) by Tiptoety. Non-admin close. Xymmax (talk) 17:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Article asserts NN -- 9 professional performances in Germany. — MusicMaker 07:18, 20 June...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article does not really assert notability, and if it did, doesn't really show notability. Delete. --Nlu...
Click to read more »assert notability, has no references and is poorly written, Also shows some POV. DraxusD 09:45, 8 July 2007 (UTC) Keep, I cleaned it up. Does assert notability...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was speedy delete no notability asserted.--Kchase T 22:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC) Paul Eckdale (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »presently stands fails to assert real world notability, namely, through the lack of reliable, third party sources. It also fails to assert general notability...
Click to read more »(page - messages - contribs) 19:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC) Delete. Does not assert notability, no refs and reads like self-bigging-up. tomasz. 20:35, 31 May...
Click to read more »reliable coverage except two entries from The Hindu but still it fails to assert why the award is in itself notable. The NGO Ramineni Foundation and its...
Click to read more »article even assert the subject's importance? Lobbyists are a dime a dozen. RayAYang (talk) 06:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Delete as not asserting notability...
Click to read more »explicitly state fulfillment of at least one of the criteria from WP:MUSIC, or assert facts which obviously imply fulfillment of at least one of those criteria...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I've nominated this here because it plausibly asserts notability, even though to me it looks like a borderline blatant hoax....
Click to read more »logs | views) – (View log) This article has no references. It does not assert notability. The topic seems to be discussed on things like message boards...
Click to read more »Rankiri (talk) 16:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC) Delete Doesn't assert why it's notable. No references to assert notability. WP:A7 and fails WP:WEB. Mr. C.C.Hey yo...
Click to read more »- does not assert the importance or significance of its subject CIreland 04:47, 18 May 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete per CSD A7, does not assert why this website...
Click to read more »20:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Delete Fails to assert notability. if genuine sources were added which asserted notability, then it should be merged with main...
Click to read more »page. The result of the debate was Speedy Deleted (A-7 - person with no assertation of notability) by User:Jinian. -- Saberwyn 23:06, 14 April 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »promotions, primarily Empressa Mexicana de Lucha Libre but they did not assert an exclusive claim to the championship." -> "Over the following years the...
Click to read more »September 2006 (UTC) PROD removed without discussion. Ariticle does not assert importance or meeting WP:WEB. --W.marsh 00:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC) Delete;...
Click to read more »practice. Now if truth and accuracy is a goal, perhaps paramount, then I would assert dissenting agreement. To be colorful, and accurate, I would suggest "the...
Click to read more »a quite promotional way (which is easy to solve), the article fails to assert notability. PROD was added, but removed by another user. A Google search...
Click to read more »which assert notability proves easy when one makes the effort. Colonel Warden (talk) 22:59, 26 August 2009 (UTC) Neither of the sources assert any actual...
Click to read more »would consider mentions in two newspapers (see the references) a stab at asserting notability. Whether these assertions are true and valid is for AfD to...
Click to read more »not to pass WP:GNG, sources are all primary, no individual notability asserted. Normally would merge to character list, but no list appears to exist....
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable college, no notability is asserted, and the references don't assert much (if any) notability. -- Kethrus |talk to me 15:07...
Click to read more »Speedy keep per above, asserts notablity. Midorihana~いいですね? 02:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC) Comment How does this article assert notability out of universe...
Click to read more »organization in the article. Añoranza: A case involving Añoranza. Users asserted that Añoranza had been incivil, and had filed a retaliatory request for...
Click to read more »Deleted for not asserting notability. Tagged again for Speedy Deletion following recreation, but it has now been expanded to at least assert notability for...
Click to read more »Speedy deleted. -- Longhair\talk 03:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC) Does not assert notability per WP:WEB. Alexa ranking of 2,301,278 isn't promising. Prodded...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE does not assert importance/significance of subject. ~~ N (t/c) 03:10, 15 January 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »SD6-Agent 18:17, 4 August 2005 (UTC) Speedy Delete - article does not assert subject's notability -Satori 18:39, 4 August 2005 (UTC) Delete and associated...
Click to read more »sufficient context to identify the subject. Even asserts notability. An article can be short and still assert notability. <<sigh>> Dlohcierekim 13:20, 14 June...
Click to read more »notable. There are no secondary references on page. The article doesn't assert notability. Momo Hemo (talk) 00:57, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Speedy Delete per...
Click to read more »on the subject. Keilanatalk(recall) 04:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC) Wow, It asserts no notability but there are seemingly reliable sources. I honestly don't...
Click to read more »April 2009 (UTC) Speedy A7 - Not only does the article not even assert notability(or assert much of anything), but the only real source for it I can find...
Click to read more »– (View log) A stub about the CEO of a hospital in Singapore. Does not assert notability beyond things one would expect of someone in his position. Delete...
Click to read more »those slices are required to be shared and they wouldn't fail themselves to assert below from this position. Negotiation is breaking the slices evenly for...
Click to read more »although I'm not an expert either by any means. Notability still needs to be asserted. --Evb-wiki 20:19, 13 August 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete - Per above. Shabda...
Click to read more »universe. However, their importance within the work of fiction does not assert their importance to the real world, which is a crude definition of notability...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) It does not really assert notability, and doesn't cite sources. --Hojimachongtalk 02:53, 25 February...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) This article does not assert the notability of its subject and is an extensive plot summary. The article...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete as it does not assert notablity per WP:BIO --Roswell native 03:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC) Weak delete, it does assert notability of a sort, but...
Click to read more »not see how this public elementary is notable - there is nothing that asserts it, just like many other elementary school. The notability tag has been...
Click to read more »TWL) There is no reliable third person information to assert notability and does not pertain to assert notability Dwanyewest (talk) 20:49, 28 August 2010...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) The article doesn't assert much notability, and the only editor to date is User:Ediblecity - I suspect...
Click to read more »meeting WP:N. JJL (talk) Merge with Stellenbosch University - article does assert some notability (Africa's oldest university men's residence, 1903), but...
Click to read more »sources providing evidence of WP:MUSIC notability criteria; article barely asserts notability. Prod was disputed. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »without qualification in the NPOV neutral voice; for example, it cannot be asserted without qualification that a place is "in Samaria". Any uses of the terms...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:NF and does not assert notability. Girolamo Savonarola 04:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC) Keeep: Sourced...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) Are notable how, exactly? Article does not assert notability, and they do not actually seem to have done anything. Google...
Click to read more »Non-notable weekday daytime student radio station, with no notability asserted Ohconfucius 02:55, 3 May 2007 (UTC) Delete NN student activity in a single...
Click to read more »the article does not assert any notability. -- lucasbfr talk 15:36, 12 May 2007 (UTC) Speedy Delete per A7. No notability asserted. Tagged as such. DarkAudit...
Click to read more »debates over Harry Potter stem largely from religious conservatives who assert that the Harry Potter stories contain occult or even Satanic subtexts. This...
Click to read more »pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 10:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC) Weak Delete Hard to assert noteability though the article is reasonably well written and referenced...
Click to read more »September 2006 (UTC) Delete - fails to assert notability. MER-C 08:57, 22 September 2006 (UTC) Delete Does not assert notability, consider speedy deletion...
Click to read more »A7: not even enough context to know whether it's a character who doesn't assert notability relative to a book or movie or whatever (that also isn't obviously...
Click to read more »--/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 03:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete - no notability asserted, no info given beyond promotion.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:59, 24 June 2008...
Click to read more »both recreation of previously deleted content and a group which does not assert notability (since it's not even due to be formed for another two years)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. The topic area itself may be notable, though the article does not assert this in a meaningful way. WP:TNT feels appropriate. At the very least it...
Click to read more »Christmas! Babymissfortune 11:21, 11 December 2017 (UTC) Delete. The article asserts notability strictly via inheritance. The sources are all internet junk...
Click to read more »spotted! This article is a good speedy delete candidate. Article does not assert notability, and posted by a single purpose user so probably a conflict of...
Click to read more »17:36, 10 April 2009 (UTC) Delete as original prodder. The article does not assert notability and cannot be expanded to notable form. Tavix | Talk 16:38...
Click to read more »do not assert significance or importance of subject (the actual test, as explicitly stated in A7); notability does not appear to be asserted, as "appeared"...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) This article has no chance of asserting notability. It is filled with NOTHING but in-universe information. It...
Click to read more »Mailer Diablo 15:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC) Article on a website that fails to assert notability. MER-C 10:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom. So much...
Click to read more »doesn't assert notability. The only references listed are to a Family Search Website which is a genealogy research website. Which does not help assert notability...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Delete, no references arose to assert anything --Steve (Stephen) talk 06:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Bugnux (edit |...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Asserts no notability at all. Sr13 03:01, 26 May 2007 (UTC) Life Mein Kabhie Kabhiee...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't assert notability with reliable sources. ❤ Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 00:38...
Click to read more »sources to assert any type of notability. Delete Undeath (talk) 01:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete A7, so tagged -- I see no assertation of notability...
Click to read more »does not assert notability, is unreferenced. Girolamo Savonarola 01:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC) Delete -- a future film, no sources asserting the production...
Click to read more »Redfarmer (talk) 13:16, 7 January 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete A7, clearly doesn't assert notability in any way. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken...
Click to read more »article doesn't assert notability Esurnir 16:53, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Delete no reliable sources therefore notability cannot be asserted or assessed. JodyB...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Article contains no references to assert WP:Notability. Ozgod 01:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC) Keep: He's been featured...
Click to read more »words seems to indicate an intent to spam; at any rate, there's not much to assert notability. Shalom Hello 01:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC) Delete. No independent...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) This article asserts no notability for the subject which is essentially the same as its notable...
Click to read more »Norman Lowell SandyDancer 11:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC) Delete - fails to assert notability. MER-C 12:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTABLE....
Click to read more »David Slater[citation needed] over the monkey selfies (December 5). PETA asserts that Naruto, the monkey named in their complaint, actually holds the rights...
Click to read more »Talk 19:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC) Keep Sources added since AfD was started now assert notability. GaryColemanFan (talk) 00:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Keep as it is...
Click to read more »to show or assert verified notability to the levels outlined by WP:WEB. Also CSD A7 an article about a group of people that does not assert the importance...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) There are no reliable sources asserting that this is a notable topic. The one reference just supports features...
Click to read more »WP articles) and not explicitly asserting notability. Then in Feb 2007 someone slapped a CSD on it for not asserting notability, and it was duly shortly...
Click to read more »individual doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO, and I have found no sources that assert the notability of the subject. SunStar Net 20:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Article does not assert the notability of this convicted murderer. Gilliam 05:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Delete this doesn't assert any importance. They appear to have some publications and patents... if the article could be rewritten to assert importance, I'd...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Delete - fails to assert notability. MER-C 09:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:WEB, does not assert notability. Michael Billington...
Click to read more »Philippines that Filipino Wikipedians have a hard time finding references to assert notability because the Internet presence of Filipino media is scarce (Inq7...
Click to read more »to WP:CSD it is. I quote 'An article about a real person that does not assert that person's importance or significance - people such as college professors...
Click to read more »00:36, 22 October 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete A7 (also possibly G11). Does not assert notability (unless you think that "a leading value-added resellers. and...
Click to read more »WP:N, as the article fails to even assert notability. --Butseriouslyfolks 08:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC) Keep, asserts notablity as public school serving a...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) Potentially notable subject, but the article doesn't ASSERT this notability, and I can find no sources, other than those on commercial...
Click to read more »Delete, no sources currently in article to assert notability. I can't find any reliable sources to add to assert notability. ~~ GB fan ~~ talk 00:30, 20...
Click to read more »per Traynor. YechielMan 18:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Delete as it does not assert notablity per Wikipedia:Notability (music). --Roswell native 03:51, 22 March...
Click to read more »Article does not assert notability and cites no independent sources. Deadly∀ssassin 21:29, 22 April 2008 (UTC) A7 No notability asserted – and given the...
Click to read more »Band, importance not asserted. Q T C 06:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete A7 - fails WP:MUSIC entirely, and doesn't assert any notability whatsoever...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete - Article fails to assert notability. Article makes very unspecific claims to notability without references...
Click to read more »Delete these can be speedied now, right? Since it doesn't assert notability (in this case, asserts nothing aside from existence). Tuf-Kat 08:22, 13 September...
Click to read more »Starblind 23:34, 16 September 2010 (UTC) Delete Notability is neither asserted nor shown. Edward321 (talk) 00:14, 18 September 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »not assert notability of its subject. Crabapplecove 21:38, 1 August 2006 (UTC) Speedy Delete As WP:CSD A7, article that does not attempt to assert the...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Does not assert notability and most of the information anyways is in the article Clanton...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was keep. Now referenced and asserts notability seicer | talk | contribs 16:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC) Birmingham...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Biography that does not assert the importance of the individual; speedy delete declined. --Mr. Vernon (talk)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy Delete - Speedy dlete on A7, Non notable group that fails to assert notability. Chris Kreider 12:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete - csd...
Click to read more »articles just because they might be notable. They either have sources that assert notability or they don't. Trusilver 04:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC) Delete No...
Click to read more »Meuuhh. The article facts proving is badly done as none of the references assert anything. Not that accurate & reliable sources don't exist, just that the...
Click to read more »assert the importance of the group of people or organization it describes. —Caesura(t) 16:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC) Delete (or speedy) Doesn't assert...
Click to read more »organization in the article. Añoranza: A case involving Añoranza. Users asserted that Añoranza had been incivil, and had filed a retaliatory request for...
Click to read more »policy called "A simple formulation" said, "Assert facts, including facts about opinions—but don't assert opinions themselves." What does this mean? Writing...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:NF, no notability asserted, and article was recreated less than 24 hours after a speedy deletion on...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) The notability of the subject is not adequately asserted. The article seems to be autobiographical. The article is written in a...
Click to read more »the organisation is non-notable and I cannot find any secondary sources asserting its notability, there is also a conflict of interest issue Declan Clam...
Click to read more »applications that should be on there that are not. Plus the article doesn't assert notability and why it is relevant. It just seems like it is riding the coat...
Click to read more »appear arbitrary. (aeropagitica) 12:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC) does not assert significance. While obviously tragic, Siam's death is no more significant...
Click to read more »the content wasn't appropriate (such as BLP's where the article didn't assert notability), so I attempted to explain to the article author why the article...
Click to read more »the secondary sources and assert notability. MastCell Talk 19:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC) Delete. The article does not assert notability, though it could...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) notability not asserted; reads like promotional material. Along with Dominic Davies article forms...
Click to read more » The result was keep, article has been improved and camera notability asserted. Canley (talk) 05:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Minolta TC-1 (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »notability is not asserted and verified. For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) No references, reads like publicity material, does not assert notability, only one other article page links to it, very limited editing...
Click to read more »unreferenced, no notability asserted Girolamo Savonarola 06:36, 20 October 2007 (UTC) Delete as the article fails to assert notability either for a film...
Click to read more »unreferenced, and no notability asserted. Girolamo Savonarola 06:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC) Delete as the article fails to assert notability either for a film...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result was delete. No arguments were made to assert or establish the subject's notability. ✗plicit 11:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to be an autobiography, no context in its current form, no references to assert notability CatcherStorm talk 08:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC) Delete Could...
Click to read more »watch | logs) Page Moses Jacob Storm deleted A7 in mainspace for failing to assert importance 6 months ago. This draft dates to abou the same time as that...
Click to read more »Jersey." This fails to assert notability. Full Blown Chaos is similar, both from 24.61.134.62. Heaven Shall Burn also fails to assert notability (specifically...
Click to read more »article was speedy-tagged as CSD A7. It doesn't have sources, but it does assert that Mr. Ng is the head of a Singaporean political party. It is left to...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Article does not assert the notability of its topic. Written primarily with in-universe, Church...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#A7 (articles about real people that do not assert the importance or significance of their subject can be speedily deleted)...
Click to read more »owner) asserts the studio is well known but nothing major comes up on Google other than apartment rentals and their own publicity. They assert that they...
Click to read more »00:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Delete, possibly speedy A7 per WP:WEB. It doesn't assert that the operating system is notable. Kesac (talk) 02:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »other enthusiast organizations, but doesn't assert notability. There are no reliable external sources asserting the club's notability - repeated references...
Click to read more »lack of credibility. None of the members of the band or albums produced assert any notability, and the bands they have toured with also lack importance;...
Click to read more »(aeropagitica) (talk) 21:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC) Non-notable structure, doesn't assert its importance apart from being old, which doesn't really count on its own...
Click to read more »July 2007 (UTC) Strong delete, possibly an A7 candidate. No notability asserted, no reliable sources to be found online. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) The article does not assert notability. Furthermore, the article is in violation of WP:OR. This reads...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete, asserts no notability. Singularity 07:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC) ALC (Another Lost...
Click to read more »October 2005 (UTC) Delete. Not only does this article fail to assert notability, it actually asserts non-notability. It's borderline speedy. --A D Monroe III...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) No notability asserted. No notable items found during customary search spryde | talk 15:20, 12...
Click to read more »administrator at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After consensus has been reached asserting that the permissions have been misused (e.g. at Wikipedia:Administrators'...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep Not speedy-able under A7, asserting expert status on a topic in major broadcast media certainly is "asserting notability". Don't be fooled by the...
Click to read more »[1]. Hal peridol (talk) 18:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete - does not assert why the subject is notable. ~ mazca talk 19:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC) Speedy...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Noteablilty not asserted in article. --Latebird (talk) 08:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Keep Its a charity...
Click to read more »notability asserted for a fictional character. Tarc (talk) 02:17, 10 September 2010 (UTC) Delete A little better than some of these, it doesn't assert notability...
Click to read more »seemingly both times by the owner or an employee of Wicked Cow, and it doesn't assert it's notability as an encyclopedia article. Bmg916 Speak to Me 03:55, 11...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Contested prod, future game release, no notability asserted Acroterion (talk) 01:29, 24 December 2007 (UTC) Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL...
Click to read more »The result was keep. W.marsh 16:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC) Comic fails to assert notability. Fails WP:WEB. Comes close to WP:CSD#A7. --Brad Beattie (talk)...
Click to read more »views) (delete) – (View log) Delete as per WP:NEO, very small population to assert notability of the group. No references at all. May be madeup. Hitro 05:58...
Click to read more »article.Lomedae talk 23:22, August 2, 2006 (UTC) Strong Delete — Fails to assert the importance of this blog. I got 984 google hits, which is not very many...
Click to read more »Church Talk 13:44, 5 October 2005 (UTC) Speedy delete. Notability is not asserted. Delete, not notable. See comment below. --Ashenai (talk) 14:55, 5 October...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Non-notable who briefly was on Ken Starr's staff. The article asserts no reason why he should be included in wikipedia. More arlaming, it is...
Click to read more »without discussion. Article doesn't assert meeting WP:WEB or WP:SOFTWARE which both could apply, doesn't assert any importance in general. --W.marsh...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Article makes no attempt to assert notability of subject. It fails WP:BIO, as he doesn't seem in any way notable...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7 as failing to assert notability nancy (talk) 13:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC) Dare 2 Ask (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »HeLLboy2HeLL (talk) 10:54, 1 August 2008 (UTC) Delete The article doesn't assert notability and a few web searches from me couldn't find anything. -- Darth...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This page does not assert notability either by the GNGs or WP:ENTERTAINER, as most of Yasuda's roles...
Click to read more »consensus. Multiple editors assert that this is a pure dictionary definition and should be deleted as such. Others assert that it is not, and contains...
Click to read more »February 2007 (UTC) Delete fails to assert or prove notability.--John Lake 01:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC) It asserts notability via the record label they...
Click to read more »TWL) The subject fails to assert notability, along with any references or in-line citations both to back up just an assertation, along with other claims...
Click to read more »being described in an article, and a substantial portion of the links asserted to be ambiguous are instances or examples of that concept or type, then...
Click to read more »biography - WP:COI - originator of article is Kycheung. Article does not assert importance or notable - does not meet requirements for WP:Notability. Ozgod...
Click to read more »the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 04:45, 14 October 2005 (UTC) Doesn't assert notability. KeithD (talk) 15:26, 3 October 2005 (UTC) Speedy A1 Dlyons493...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) OK, so she's apparently a real font designer. Nothing asserts why she is more notable than any other font designer. A promotional article...
Click to read more »good with an AFD. Kww (talk) 22:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC) A7 and salt. No assertation of notability, no reliable sources. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Article asserts notability therefore not a candidate for speedy deletion. Zero Ghits or...
Click to read more »odometer) 21:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:MUSIC. The article fails to assert his notability, and a Google search returned several myspace hits in the...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) While the article is interesting, the introduction fails to assert how the band is notable and worthy for inclusion as a Wikipedia article...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't assert notability sufficiently Monni (talk) 11:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »this article neither asserts notability nor has it. Accounting4Taste 04:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete If it doesn't assert notability, then it...
Click to read more »be not sufficiently reliable. No reliable sources found per WP:RS that assert notability criteria at WP:CREATIVE for creative professionals. --Kudpung...
Click to read more »to make of this. It was previously deleted as WP:CSD#A7. I think it does assert significance, though it looks like a soapbox to me. The thing was recreated...
Click to read more »deletion on the grounds that it does not assert notability. JYolkowski removed the speedy tag, saying it does assert notability. All the article says about...
Click to read more »look the same way, and include the same information. Episodes that do not assert notability by including significant coverage in reliable sources should...
Click to read more »namespace. --- RockMFR 07:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC) keep articles should not assert notability, notability should be obvious from the article, this one seems...
Click to read more »source. --BradBeattie 04:57, 19 October 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete - fails to assert notability. So tagged. MER-C 11:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »that information. It is important to assume good faith by an editor who asserts ipso facto notability, and check out whether that argument is substantiated...
Click to read more »