WP:BROCHUREWP:BROCHURE WP:ADMASQWP:ADMASQ WP:SPAMPAGEWP:SPAMPAGE WP:ARTSPAMWP:ARTSPAM Articles considered advertisements include those that are solicitations...

We are drowning in promotional artspam: Wikipedia has been gravitating towards a vehicle for business and product promotion for too long. ← Back to Contents...

2018 (UTC) It appears to me to be SEO/linkspam style ARTSPAM as opposed to single topic artspam. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC) Weak...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 5 June 2013 (UTC) Delete Looks like WP:ARTSPAM. If there is a level of notability, add the material to the article with...

November 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete - WP:ARTSPAM Veryhuman (talk) 06:03, 17 November 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete - WP:ARTSPAM --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:25, 17...

"unambiguous advertising or promotion," this article is basically a WP:ARTSPAM-type promotion of a corporate event. Created and editing almost solely...

20:28, 20 January 2019 (UTC) DeleteARTSPAM. Even before the founder of the company got hold of it, it was artspam. Not eligible for A7 as prior decline...

Single-page Edition WP:POST/1 8 April 2015 Op-ed We are drowning in promotional artspam News and notes Advancement department to be created at the Foundation,...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Made-up word, obvious vehicle for WP:ARTSPAM of the company "Viscendo LLC," founded by Jody Basye. Borders (closely)...

July 2011 (UTC) Delete. No evidence of notability. A neologism and WP:ARTSPAM. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 11:28, 17 July 2011 (UTC) Delete - it's a non-notable...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 5 June 2013 (UTC) Delete Looks like WP:ARTSPAM. Can't find anything showing notability either for Meyer or for Perseus...

Archives View Latest Issue 8 April 2015 Op-ed We are drowning in promotional artspam Wikipedia has been gravitating towards a vehicle for business and product...

Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 04:27, 7 March 2012 (UTC) Delete I'd consider it WP:ARTSPAM unless author can establish WP:NOTABILITY —JmaJeremy talk contribs 04:38...

(Createspace); no coverage in the news or in the book trade. This is blatant ARTSPAM. Yunshui (talk) 13:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC) Delete Clearly fails WP:NBOOKS...

being advertisement without notable encyclopedic content, appears to be WP:ARTSPAM. Zhernovoi (talk) 17:20, 26 May 2010 (UTC) Strong Keep This page has been...

Op-ed: We are drowning in promotional artspam Wikipedia has been gravitating towards a vehicle for business and product promotion for too long. News and...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim of notability made. Also appears to be WP:ARTSPAM - one of the major contributors, User:Tindaleoliver, clearly has a vested...

disclose in any way. Orange Mike | Talk 03:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC) delete ARTSPAM sourced only from corporate and YouTube. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:58,...

scratch DGG ( talk ) 04:50, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Delete Speedy Delete G11 WP:ARTSPAM. Can we not WP:CSD#G11 articles in the DRAFT namespace? --Surturz (talk)...

September 2009 (UTC) Delete. As above, not notable product. This is WP: ARTSPAM. --Whoosit (talk) 07:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Delete: I can't find significant...

Russ Harris (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Draft is WP:ARTSPAM. Subject of article is clearly not notable. Article is written by subject...

• Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC) Delete - Looks like WP:ARTSPAM but I could be wrong. -      Hydroxonium (talk) 09:18, 1 October 2010 (UTC)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Straight up WP:ARTSPAM with little coverage, mostly WP:MILL and press releases. Praxidicae (talk)...

Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 20 February 2010 (UTC) Delete. No sources, WP:OR, WP:ARTSPAM. Pcap ping 14:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

comply with Neutral Point of View NPOV? Why didn't you tag as such WP:ARTSPAM if this is your main criterion for deletion? This could also be a helpful...

(UTC) Delete as not meeting notability guidelines. Content consists of WP:ARTSPAM w/o RS and w/o notability.12:52, 15 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

glance, you say, "wow, alright!" Then you look hard at the sourcing. WP:ARTSPAM.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:15, 25 July 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is...

Lambert (talk) 00:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC) Delete – run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM of non-notable subject. Article is single-purpose account who has made...

coverage. Article was written by two single-purpose users; this is WP:ARTSPAM. Haakon (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC) Delete - cannot find any third...

(UTC) delete lacks sufficient RS coverage to meet inclusion guidelines. Artspam. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC) Delete -- WP:TOOSOON / WP:ARTSPAM and mostly trivia as in: "As on April 26, 2017, the app has over 1 lakh...

can't find anything else that could establish his notability. Possible WP:ARTSPAM.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 08:28, 25 December 2009 (UTC) Delete There is no...

2 January 2018 (UTC) delete does not meet gng, anybio, lacks rs and is artspam. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten". Well written as ARTSPAM goes, but clearly G11. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)...

2010 (UTC) Delete This is just an advert for the product, violating WP:ARTSPAM. Creator account has been blocked. Geoff Who, me? 13:24, 30 October 2010...

of Tlön (talk) 18:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC) Strong delete. Obvious WP:ARTSPAM. Pcap ping 06:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Pure WP:ARTSPAM of a company that is "closely tied" to another company with no real in...

JSTOR · TWL) Recreation by a WP:SPA of an article previously deleted as WP:ARTSPAM with the same problem. The subject might well be notable, I didn't even...

interviews or financial coverage, none of which pass the test. Also WP:ARTSPAM. Praxidicae (talk) 15:38, 10 October 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

undisclosed paid editing org. GreenC 15:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC) *Delete as artspam and per nomination.. This is not a mainstream school. The major article...

January 2018 (UTC) delete does not meet notability requirements. promotional artspam. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

Promotional article. FITINDIA 01:38, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM for non notable person--Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:Artspam (about upcoming movie)inserted after posting created--Dlohcierekim (talk)...

& Salt Unable to find any reliable source coverage. Salt to prevent WP:ARTSPAM. --Cybercobra (talk) 04:52, 18 September 2009 (UTC) The above discussion...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced except from organization's web sites. WP:ARTSPAM going back to 2013. Non notable. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:20, 19 February...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PRiSM Widefox; talk 15:15, 12 June 2013 (UTC) Delete ARTSPAM. --Randykitty (talk) 15:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ARTSPAM. No indication of meeting WP:GNG. This is the stubbed version. The longer...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable wp:artspam. Sources are not significant coverage to meet notability. Was tagged for...

discussions. Cliff Smith 04:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC) Subject appears to fail WP:ARTSPAM and WP:CORP. References consist of alphabetical listing with trivial coverage...

June 2012 (UTC) Delete. Not just notability, also a case of WP:COI and WP:ARTSPAM. The creator seems to be on Wikipedia to promote his work, whether it be...

discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC) STRONG Delete Per WP:ARTSPAM (creator of article has identical username to subject's Twitter account...

volunteers like us to find some to support an article that's close to WP:ARTSPAM. Pcap ping 11:37, 18 January 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:ARTSPAM: written like an advert, does not appear to meet WP:GNG, huge banner image...

articles are just thinly disguised SPAM. See here for more on that WP:ARTSPAM. I try to spend at least one night a week on what I refer to as Wiki Crank...

00:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC) Delete per the above comments. Looks like WP:ARTSPAM and I haven't found any sources to establish notability. Giving an interview...

this is a copy paste from the subject's own website. Cannt even call it "artspam". Just "spam". -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:21, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Note:...

and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 16:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC) DELETE WP:ARTSPAM (not the worst I've seen) with promotional content not adequately sourced...

-- • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC) Delete - looks like WP:ARTSPAM to me. No Google news hits. Cocytus [»talk«] 02:28, 15 January 2010 (UTC)...

Delete - Judging by the creator's username, this is pretty blatant WP:ARTSPAM. The text is copied from the subject/creator's website (which is a piece...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nothing more than WP:ARTSPAM, non-notable film festival, absolutely no real coverage. Praxidicae (talk)...

of the deletion review. Deb (talk) 10:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Delete Artspam. Coverage is mostly from manufacturer. Lacks significant coverage to meet...

JSTOR · TWL) No significant claim of notability. Also appears to be WP:ARTSPAM - page creator, User:Kyleflaherty, has a vested interest - see [1] Bazonka...

requirements. Subject does not meet notability requirements. This reads like artspam to me. Not averse to someone honoring the CSD's already on page. -- Dlohcierekim...

barney barney (talk) 10:23, 21 April 2013 (UTC) Delete possibly speedily. Artspam - an apparent article whose only purpose is the link. (Interesting that...

 JUJUTACULAR  04:39, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Delete. Ugh. As above + WP: ARTSPAM. --Whoosit (talk) 07:06, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete - unsourced...

sixtynine • whaddya want? • 15:56, 2 November 2022 (UTC) Make it so WP:ARTSPAM lacking coverage to meet inclusion requirements. Per above-- Deepfriedokra...

discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 05:10, 16 August 2015 (UTC) Delete. Looks like artspam. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:23, 16 August 2015 (UTC) Unfortunately delete...

mentions, interviews or otherwise not independent, in depth coverage. Also WP:ARTSPAM. Praxidicae (talk) 17:42, 23 March 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

and independent or in depth enough to meet inclusion criteria. And it is artspam.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:33, 27 June 2018 (UTC) Delete as promotional...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Artspam. Lacks sufficient coverage in reliable sources to meet GNG or notability...

Delete Maybe even Speedy Delete. This appears to be a promotional piece. WP:ARTSPAM --Jersey92 (talk) 03:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Ritzman (talk) 02:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable WP: ARTSPAM. --Whoosit (talk) 07:54, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete It may be...

22:17, 11 June 2013 (UTC) Delete Lacks notability. Article reads like WP:ARTSPAM. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 13:19, 8 September 2013 (UTC) Delete, per WP:ARTSPAM - DonCalo (talk) 14:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

don't feel that it passes WP:N. Simply put the article is very much WP:ARTSPAM. There is also some WP:OR in some areas where I highly doubt that there...

purposes, as was the article for his company, LendInvest. Run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM masquerading as encyclopedia articles. Undisclosed COI editing is prohibited...

Kudpung (talk · contribs) as G11: "Unambiguous advertising or promotion: G11 - artspam" (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 19:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC) Luciano...

coverage from reliable sources. Does not meet notability requirements. Just Artspam.Dlohcierekim's sock User talk:Dlohcierekim 04:58, 28 May 2018 (UTC) The...

well. . DGG ( talk ) 17:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Delete Article is clear WP:ARTSPAM and fails notability as per WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. A Google turned up...

subscribers but there's nothing to back it up. Nothing more than corp/WP:ARTSPAM that lacks in any in depth, meaningful coverage in English or Arabic (I...

WER 01:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC) Delete - It appears to be unambiguous WP:ARTSPAM. The reliable sources listed only briefly mention Mr. Chewy in passing...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is nothing more than covert artspam for reactivex and is specific only to this, basically a neologism and rife...

coverage in reliable sources. Article cites only the website itself. Pure WP:ARTSPAM. --Cybercobra (talk) 05:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC) Comment. Here's another...

16:17, 13 August 2014 (UTC) Delete Not encyclopaedic. Looks possibly like artspam, but I can't say what for - perhaps the link never got posted. Otherwise...

Legacypac (talk) 04:43, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Delete As fairly hopeless WP:Artspam. The sources that treat in depth are simply rehashings of how wonderful...

understanding the characterization of the article as advertising or promotion. WP:ARTSPAM states, "Articles considered advertisements include those that are solicitations...

Strong delete. The topic might be notable, but this article is just WP:ARTSPAM, just check links. I've removed one that had no contents whatsoever besides...

Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Delete informercial per WP:ARTSPAM. Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:28, 27 February 2013 (UTC) The above discussion...

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Delete Unambiguous WP:ARTSPAM. Fails notability as per WP:GNG and WP:BK. And while we are on the subject...

It's at best a violation of WP:ENT and at worst WP:SELFPROMOTE and/or WP:ARTSPAM. A few things that jumped out at me: "He is known for his androgynous presentation...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is some covert WP:ARTSPAM for a term that, as far as I can tell, isn't notable, widely used or covered...

evidence of notability. SpinningSpark 18:47, 7 June 2018 (UTC) Delete: WP:ARTSPAM with no effort to have provided even a modicum of sources. K.e.coffman...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ARTSPAM sourced to subject and press releases, mostly. Other sources do not treat...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ARTSPAM moved from Draft's by coi creator. Tagged for CSD for G11 but CSD "declined"...

stretch, only one hit in google news, and zero in books. Basically, WP:ARTSPAM. Pcap ping 06:18, 15 May 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...

meet [[WP:NCORP]] and [[WP:CORPDEPTH]]. In any case, it is discreet WP:ARTSPAM. Sam Sailor 18:51, 6 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

SwisterTwister talk 07:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC) Delete - appears to be WP:ARTSPAM created by single-purpose account. Citobun (talk) 07:26, 16 November 2015...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ARTSPAM about company lacking significant coverage in reliable sources independent...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article seems a classic case of WP:ARTSPAM - I have looked and can't find any evidence that it is inherently notable...

(talk) 01:45, 13 April 2012 (UTC) Delete per nom, WP:NOT, WP:MILL, and WP:ARTSPAM. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC) Keep and...

HrafnTalkStalk(P) 08:40, 30 December 2010 (UTC) Delete - Seems like WP:ARTSPAM. Afro (Talk) 17:40, 30 December 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

11:03, 25 November 2020 (UTC) Delete Does not meet WP:N in any variant. WP:ARTSPAM. Nominator sums things up well. Does meet my criteria for WP:G11, but as...

Unreferenced. No evidence of any notability . Fails WP:CORP. Looks like WP:ARTSPAM.  Velella  Velella Talk   21:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC) Delete per nom...

overly promotional at present, but I don't think it's unsalvageable. Per WP:ARTSPAM, it could be salvaged by rewriting it in a neutral point of view, including...

not a thing of any consequence or reliability. Good (bad?) example of WP:ARTSPAM. No merits at all.  Velella  Velella Talk   14:55, 8 March 2012 (UTC) Delete...

notable. Lacks sufficient in depth coverage. Trimmed down to stub from artspam.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:02, 23 March 2018 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NMUSIC...

Only listed source is a promo website which makes me think this is WP:ARTSPAM. The article makes no clear claim to notability and a quick glance at Google...

(talk) 13:22, 16 November 2011 (UTC) Speedy Delete . Clear case of WP:ARTSPAM. Have added new tag. Veryhuman (talk) 06:00, 17 November 2011 (UTC) Was...

Dusti*Let's talk!* 00:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC) Delete - per WP:BLP, WP:ARTSPAM and WP:SYNTH. Most of the article is not only a PR puff piece, but is synthesized...

Wikipedia with the Yellow Pages or a trade directory. Fails WP:ORG and is WP:ARTSPAM for a typical high street cram school for languages. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)...

is salvageable — Frankie (talk) 17:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC) Delete Probably artspam attempt. When there's a title and a site that matches the title, that's...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC) Delete Possible artspam. Definitely a list of apparently non-notable companies. There is currently...

00:40, 11 November 2014 (UTC) Delete - It is pretty blatant WP:ARTSPAM. As the nominator has noted, the related Jamcracker article has been relentlessly...

WP:RS. -- Y not? 17:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Delete Both Clearly case of WP:ARTSPAM. Fails Notability as per WP:GNG, WP:FILMMAKER and WP:ANYBIO. -Ad Orientem...

a comprehensive failure of WP:NMUSICIAN and comes across a lot like WP:ARTSPAM. Besides the two hagiographies cited as the article's only sources, online...

visible to Google searches. 220 of Borg 08:49, 19 April 2015 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM. User has made no other edits than to this promotional page. --Surturz...

(talk) 23:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC) Delete. Clearly violates WP:NOTE and WP:ARTSPAM. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 23:59, 28 January 2011 (UTC) Keep. While the tone...

since I can't even see any claims of notability. Definitely breaks WP:ARTSPAM. Jonobennett (talk) 15:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC) Claiming to represent...

discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:58, 7 January 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:ARTSPAM. No independent coverage whatsoever, at least in English - fails WP:COMPANY...

results with no indepth coverage in secondary sources. Run-of-the-mill WP:ARTSPAM. Citobun (talk) 10:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

01:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC) Delete - non-notable, run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM by editor with undeclared conflict of interest. Undisclosed paid editing...

discussions. —RadioFan (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC) Delete Blatant WP:ARTSPAM. --Cybercobra (talk) 20:03, 22 September 2009 (UTC) Delete all of these...

run. Just my .02. Star Mississippi 21:13, 21 March 2022 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM worthy of WP:G11. Does not meet sourcing requirement for notability requirements...

discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:19, 9 December 2014 (UTC) Delete: WP:ARTSPAM, WP:NOTESSAY. A strangely narrowly scoped essay promoting a product and...

DGG ( talk ) 02:10, 16 November 2015 (UTC) Delete - run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM masquerading as an encyclopedia article. Undisclosed paid editing is prohibited...

be unambiguous advertising. I nominate the article under, WP:CV and WP:ARTSPAM. Gsingh (talk) 17:13, 15 April 2012 (UTC) Sorry the correct source appears...

objectivity give credence to the nominator's assertion that this is WP:ARTSPAM. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 11:18, 20 November 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is...

JSTOR · TWL) Renominating for the same reason as prior. Straight up WP:ARTSPAM with little coverage, mostly WP:MILL and press releases. Praxidicae (talk)...

~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:53, 16 May 2018 (UTC) delete carefully crafted WP:artspam. The cites and ref's are superficially misleading. One must delve deeper...

paradox. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM. Fails WP:GNG. Honestly, not saying it is, but if this is the product of...

report Auto-generated every hour. Editor interaction utility Adding artspam WP:ARTSPAM such as The Export of Low Cost Brewery Equipment, Goat semen, TMR...

with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." Also, it is WP:ARTSPAM. While it does not meet my threshold for deleting under WP:G11, I would...

discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC) delete veiled WP:artspam. Lacks WP:RS. Possibly WP:CSD#A11--Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:45, 28 March...

hallmarks of a commissioned work. It's quite obviously (to me at least) artspam - advertorial for a fashion firm masquerading as a Wikipedia BLP. All the...

Federation′. --Gpkp (u • t • c) 04:01, 5 October 2018 (UTC) Delete this is WP:ARTSPAM and grossly fails WP:GNG. None of the sources have in depth coverage and...

JD Sports. Not notable enough for a standalone article and clearly WP:ARTSPAM created by single-purpose account. Citobun (talk) 10:14, 17 November 2015...

from press releases created by the same account that created all the WP:ARTSPAM at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dragon_View_(software). Pcap ping 16:28...

16:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC) Delete per nom and as wholly promotional WP:ARTSPAM. I tagged for WP:CSD#G11. No, it is not notable. It cannot and should not...

sandbox version per WP:G11. WP:A7 also looks defensible. Delete as WP:ARTSPAM about a subject who does not meet WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG, or WP:NMUSIC. The...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) More WP:ARTSPAM from the producer of Dragon View (software). The claimed IDC paper is actually...

notability guideline which may or may not apply. Additionally, violates WP:ARTSPAM; the only content contributor is User:SpencerDouglass (talk), who is listed...

Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC) Delete, per WP:ARTSPAM, hardly any coverage in mainstream sources. - DonCalo (talk) 14:53, 8 September...

manipulate the results. aeschyIus (talk) 02:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM promoting a non notable member of a political youth organization. As mentioned...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ARTSPAM that serves only to promote the subject. Subject does not meet notability...

Celestina007 (talk) 19:28, 7 May 2021 (UTC) Delete: per nom, indeed looks like WP:ARTSPAM, WP:BEFORE does not show up sigcov at all CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:26...

Please do consider my arguments seriously. (unsigned by anon) DELETE per WP:ARTSPAM. --Redtigerxyz Talk 09:32, 3 March 2015 (UTC) Advice - What do you think...

been written by the subject of the article himself, thus violating WP:ARTSPAM and WP:COI in style. He has also uploaded a lot of pictures seemingly just...

a reliable source talking about subject. Fails Notability, possible WP:ARTSPAM Evano1van (talk) 07:40, 19 April 2013 (UTC) Delete: Clearly fails WP:NOTABILITY...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not-notable subject, WP:ARTSPAM. Citobun (talk) 16:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC) Well, Category:Hotels and...

standard. The nom sort of accused you of Artspam, which is unfair. I believe you wrote the article (way before any Artspam problem) in good faith. The issue...

WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 13:57, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Delete, subtle WP:ARTSPAM. A sentence like "claiming to fill a major gap in building operational...

enthusiastic student. It could even be by someone working for the ACA - artspam can come from normally respectable organisations. Whoever it's by, and...

Bearcat (talk) 12:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC) Delete Poorly sourced WP:ARTSPAM does not meet any inclusion criteria one might name-- Deepfriedokra (talk)...

the only purpose this article serves at this point is as a coatrack for artspam. It contains no information that can't readily be found via Google, no...

nothing to allow us to establish notability. It's also little more than WP:ARTSPAM. Pol430 talk to me 10:08, 7 May 2012 (UTC) Hello, there are no independent...

claimants are product vendors, article gives the appearance of being WP:ARTSPAM. 24.177.123.74 (talk) 04:17, 29 January 2011 (UTC) Completing nomination...

require a complete rewrite to turn into a encyclopaedic article. See WP:ARTSPAM. If someone wants to completely rewrite it, then I may reconsider. -- Mattinbgn\talk...

(UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE — MarkH21talk 15:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM that fails to meet WP:GNG inclusion requirements including WP:ANYBIO --Deepfriedokra...

04:03, 11 November 2015 (UTC) Delete - non-notable, run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM by editor with undeclared conflict of interest. Undisclosed paid editing...

timed 16:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Delete, it's advertising. WP:ARTSPAM. Haakon (talk) 16:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Delete No sources provided...

notable. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC) delete non notable. artspam. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Delete Agree with nom...

puppetry -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:22, 2 June 2025 (UTC) Delete Unsourced WP:ARTSPAM. per nomination rationale.---- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:19, 2 June 2025...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ARTSPAM ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 11:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC) speedy under...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This appears to be WP:ARTSPAM. I wasn't able to find significant secondary coverage of this software...

worth, being go glowingly featured in 4th place google search on beer. WP:ARTSPAM is absolutely obvious here as well as who primarily benefit from this article...

Reads like an advertisement and the company is not notable enough. See WP:ARTSPAM. » Gommeh (he/him) 13:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC) Keep/Ignore. “Reads like and...

12:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per nominator. Run-of-the-mill WP:ARTSPAM by conflict of interest editor. Subject lacks in-depth coverage in a breadth...

(UTC) Delete Per norm. Not notable. looks like part of a PR campaign WP:ARTSPAM, subtle, but there.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:43, 15 July 2019 (UTC) The...

Oaktree b (talk) 02:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC) Delete: per nom. Legacy WP:ARTSPAM that does not meet inclusion requirements.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:59...

lottery", notability is not evident and the article is promotional WP:ARTSPAM. Previously deleted on 2018-04-09 under G11. Sam Sailor 08:23, 25 September...

meet WP:N, though the article seems to be basically an advertisement WP:ARTSPAM. Assuming the article is accurate, they might well provide a service that...

and dearth of coverage in secondary reliable sources. Run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM by single-edit, single-purpose account. Citobun (talk) 10:23, 17 November...

JSTOR · TWL) I think this is a case of WP:TOOSOON and a massive case of WP:ARTSPAM. There is a fair amount of hyper local coverage but little in the way of...

15:22, 27 June 2012 (UTC) Delete per nom — full of WP:WIKIPUFFERY and WP:ARTSPAM. —JmaJeremyTALKCONTRIBS 19:58, 27 June 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...

article are painfully obvious. Suggested reading: WP:NOTPROMOTION, WP:ARTSPAM, WP:NPOV. The article could easily have been speedily deleted for blatant...

in-depth about the book, I agree that this article has issues with WP:ARTSPAM/WP:COATRACK and should be deleted. Smmurphy(Talk) 16:30, 31 March 2017...

Rosguill talk 17:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC) Wikipedia:ARTSPAMWikipedia:ARTSPAM → Wikipedia:Spam#Advertisements masquerading as articles  (talk · links ·...

(talk) 18:24, 3 May 2021 (UTC) Delete: fails to satisfy WP:NCORP, indeed WP:ARTSPAM CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC) Merge to Gartner, the...

17:53, 26 March 2018 (UTC) Delete does not meet WP:GNG requirements. WP:artspam. Creator did a good job of creating native advertising. If only we could...

that it exists and organizes conferences. Highly POV style which fails WP:ARTSPAM. Not notable  Velella  Velella Talk   11:30, 5 December 2012 (UTC) Weak...

e-cigarettes. Piotrus followed with an op-ed "We are drowning in promotional artspam". Then the news broke that "Sony emails reveal corporate practices and...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:ARTSPAM. How considerate of the article, it even gives us two links in the references...

subject of an encyclopaedia article. Specifically it fails WP:ORG, WP:ARTSPAM Andyjsmith (talk) 22:39, 24 September 2015 (UTC) Comment. I agree that...

otherwise.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:43, 13 July 2021 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM piling on after coming from renamer queue. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:39...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Rejected at AfC as WP:ARTSPAM,moved into mainspace by main contributor. Reads like an advertisement,...

discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:15, 15 August 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:ARTSPAM. Reads like promotional material, and no evidence of notability. Dominus...

itself? No. --Calton | Talk 23:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC) Delete – more WP:ARTSPAM by WP:COI accounts in spite of our policies on what Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia...

possibly be eligible but cleary fails WP:GNG. Deliberately created as artspam and has slipped throgh the net ever since. The only sources/links are still...

Draft:Government People Group (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​ WP:ARTSPAM created by subject's communications person. Sourced mostly to company and...

context of this op-ed as advertisements masquerading as articles (in short, artspam) rather than external links spamming. The latter is more easily identifiable...

this is an autobiography and almost certainly an advertisement - cf WP:ARTSPAM.  Velella  Velella Talk   19:18, 7 November 2011 (UTC) Delete No evidence...

promotional article about a non-notable sport, failing policies at WP:ARTSPAM, WP:VER and WP:N. Googling "Guided chaos" and eliminating blogs, wikis...

(UTC) Addendum Creator asked me to look again at article. It's still WP:ARTSPAM and the added ref's do not cover the subject in significant depth. --Deepfriedokra...

Iskandar323 (talk) 10:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC) (edit conflict)Delete WP:ARTSPAM Does not meet inclusion criteria. Preys, purposefully or not, on the anguish...

in the sources. Kleuske (talk) 16:13, 26 November 2016 (UTC) Delete as artspam. Full of peacock terms and PoV. The article was developed by a team of...

08:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per nominator. Run-of-the-mill WP:ARTSPAM with little to no encyclopedic value once you strip away the puffery. Lacks...

WP:GNG. WP:RS insufficient to support content or establish notability. WP:ARTSPAM--Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC) Hi Chrissy, I shared a...

business. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:32, 12 May 2018 (UTC) Delete tedious WP:ARTSPAM, supposedly written by the company's now former PR Manager. Feel free to...

// have a cup // beans // 00:28, 25 March 2015 (UTC) Delete: obvious WP:ARTSPAM ("...simplify network processes, increase flexibility and control from...

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-04-08/Op-ed "We are drowning in promotional artspam" Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-10-07/Op-ed "Walled gardens of corruption"...

of BLPs of relatively unknown subjects. Possibly also deletable as WP:ARTSPAM with WP:COATRACKed sourcing. Per discussion here and...

think this passes, but barely. RayTalk 16:42, 20 April 2011 (UTC) Keep. WP:ARTSPAM content has been rewritten in accordance to WP:NPOV, and his other accomplishments...

COI/UPE? COI admitted but UPE denied by one sock. Had they not created WP:ARTSPAM, would we care? Noting for transparency that I came here from the unblock...

that.--Collingwood (talk) 11:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOT, WP:ARTSPAM and WP:COI. Wikipedia is NOT a "vehicle for advertising".--Hu12 (talk)...

the article should be rewritten to be less likely to be flagged under WP:ARTSPAM, as said by rburk41, it has enough third party verifiable references that...

delete. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM that I came close to deleting under WP:G11, but it is not "totally promotional...

veteran, fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG, looked more to me like some kind of WP:ARTSPAM for his book. WP:BEFORE gave me nothing of independent sigcov. CommanderWaterford...

Donald1659 (talk) 02:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC) Strong delete per others. WP:ARTSPAM by COI editors. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a marketing platform...

without all the corpspam. SITH (talk) 09:58, 29 May 2019 (UTC) delete all artspam. Vast number if newly created accounts participating is noted. DlohCierekim...

value of digitization 2015-04-08, Op-ed: We are drowning in promotional artspam 2015-05-13, Op-ed: What made Wikipedia lose its reputation? 2015-06-17...

October 2011 (UTC) Delete as with this user's other creations, this is WP:ARTSPAM. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PROMOTION. Yunshui 雲水 12:43, 28 October 2011 (UTC)...

not shown that she is a remotely notable person, and this seems like WP:ARTSPAM.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 06:17, 3 January 2010 (UTC) Jedlicka is a known expert...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This appears to be wp:artspam for Rock the Post's new “Startup Investing” program. See the external link...

of WP:GS/Crypto. MER-C 20:25, 7 June 2018 (UTC) Delete. Weakly sourced ARTSPAM, fails NCORP/GNG, delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 21:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC)...

October 2011 (UTC) Which part of WP:SPAM is being referred to? Is it WP:ARTSPAM? If so, how is the article considered in your opinion to be an advertisement...

The references were mentioned. The Draft may be a "Stub" but can't be an ARTSPAM i.e. an advertisement. Couldn't understand the logic behind calling it...

should not have survived in the mainspace for three weeks. This is pure WP:ARTSPAM – that is, it is promotional in nature but disguised as a legitimate article...

CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) New account pursuing same WP:ARTSPAM-esque edits to same articles, created a day after the puppet master and...

is merely advertising masquerading as encyclopaedic content. Fails WP:ARTSPAM. Kb.au (talk) 11:08, 6 March 2018 (UTC) Delete The article reads like a...

notability as required by WP:CORP. Much is is highly promotion and fails is WP:ARTSPAM  Velella  Velella Talk   20:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

clearly too much, and with the coverage being very uneven, including wp:ARTSPAM (articles that are merely spam). So that implies Piotrus is willing to...

the same reason without improvements, it was rejected. Maybe reading WP:ARTSPAM and WP:NPOV may help in cleaning up the article. Best, Taewangkorea (talk)...

minor memes. --Falcadore (talk) 12:32, 22 March 2011 (UTC) Delete, per WP:ARTSPAM. TheChrisD Rants•Edits 13:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC) Delete This isn't even...

you have an actual reason to do so - you voted "provisional keep" for WP:ARTSPAM for no reason except you thought the others (who were correct) were espousing...

article in toto is purely promotional, and it falls within the guideline WP:ARTSPAM as a "public relations piece[] designed to promote a[n] ... individual...

Juliancolton | Talk 18:44, 14 November 2015 (UTC) Delete - run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM masquerading as an encyclopedia article. Undisclosed paid editing is prohibited...

is public domain, given that the resulting article violates WP:NPOV, WP:ARTSPAM and WP:PEACOCK. Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:07, 26 October 2012 (UTC) Addressed...

Migperez1 (talk) 12:35, 26 January 2011 (UTC) Come back when you've read WP:ARTSPAM. -Cntras (talk) 12:36, 26 January 2011 (UTC) I've altered some of the article...

blatant enough and is the Ref Desk "article enough" to delink it per WP:ARTSPAM? Might be best before archiving (we're not an SEO technique), but to leave...

Prod expired, last edit was September 2009 User:Mdupont/FreeSB2010 WP:ARTSPAM - promotion of an annual event User:Mdupont/JamesMDuPont Stale draft of...

rewrite Endel ( company) article, regarding submission comments about ARTSPAM, but I don't understand, how should I rewrite page, to make it more clear...

really reliable material. DGG ( talk ) 10:31, 17 July 2016 (UTC) Delete.. Artspam and/or vanity. Many thanks to Voceditenore for her meticulous investigation...

--Gwern (contribs) 19:56 10 January 2010 (GMT) UC4 is not FOSS, but it's WP:ARTSPAM written from press releases, by a well-known spammer. It just goes to show...

Northamerica1000(talk) 22:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC) Delete, per WP:ARTSPAM. - DonCalo (talk) 14:27, 8 September 2013 (UTC) The tone of the article...

but it certainly fails WP:GNG, which is more than enough. Probably WP:ARTSPAM too. Andyjsmith (talk) 15:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

speedy deletion itself are questionable here. See the proposed procedure WP:ARTSPAM: „Blatant examples of advertising masquerading as articles can be speedily...

then and now is that this is some sort (never before saw the like) of WP:ARTSPAM. (Ah, well there it is in the deletion nomination. I knew there was a WP:COI...

deletion discussions. North America1000 10:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC) Delete. ARTSPAM sourced with NEWSPRIMARY, does not meet [[WP:NCORP]]/[[WP:CORPDEPTH]]....

present, the article is highly promotional, and not neutral in tone. See WP:ARTSPAM and WP:TONE for more information. Even if the tone is substantially improved...

a reliable source talking about subject. Fails Notability, possible WP:ARTSPAM Evano1van (talk) 07:41, 19 April 2013 (UTC) Delete: Clearly a non-notable...

article over and over. casualdejekyll 18:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM about subject lacking sufficient coverage in reliable, independent sources...

(talk) 09:16, 2 April 2018 (UTC) Delete I believe the G11 was appropriate. artspam.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC) PS fails Wikipedia:Notability...

contribs) My draft submission was rejeced for failing to meet WP:GNG and WP:ARTSPAM. The tone of the draft could be altered, but Luton Today (source for 3...

notable when noticed by the general marketplace, but for now I suspect WP:ARTSPAM. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Delete Same...

says that your submission reads like an advertisement. Please read WP:ARTSPAM for more. JTP (talk • contribs) 22:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC) User:NotTheFakeJTP...

it - they are taught it for their MBA. Wikipedia is not the venue for artspam and advertorial. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC) Delete...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 5 June 2013 (UTC) Delete Looks like WP:ARTSPAM. Can't find anything showing notability either for Meyer or for Perseus...

rights. –xenotalk 21:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC) Has anyone else noticed the artspam masquerading as economy driving tips etc, and recently even hair and skin...

because you have failed to explain how the article is WP:PROMO or WP:ARTSPAM. The onus is on you. TheKaphox T 21:54, 16 October 2016 (UTC) You read...

and visitor flow to my site.[101]" which is where the WP:SPAM (See: WP:ARTSPAM) comes into play. Bidgee (talk) 12:28, 10 December 2010 (UTC) I accidently...

"blip" on WP. Huge media opportunities have been turned down: really? WP:ARTSPAM must have been brought up before. I'd say there's a pretty serious admitted...

reflect. And as for afd, it's never a waste of time to try to clear out artspam that is poorly sourced. DlohCierekim 16:30, 7 May 2019 (UTC) I concur and...

the other hand, this looks like conflated, inflated, and overrated WP:ARTSPAM, if anyone not as deletionist as I could look at it.-- Deepfriedokra 07:50...

multiple accounts have been known to participate at WP:AFC -- ouch. WP:ARTSPAM is an on-going problem, unfortunately, and banning a contributor in this...

Notwithstanding nom's somewhat intemperate wording this is a clear case of WP:ARTSPAM. Subject fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:AUTHOR, WP:BASIC, WP:BLP and WP:RS...

114.150 (talk) 18:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC) Delete - run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM by single-purpose account. Undisclosed paid editing is prohibited by our...

is so urgent that it needs to be published immediately - not even the artspam bios for political candidates shortly before ele3ctions or soccer player...

be able to identify copyright violations Must be able to recognise WP:ARTSPAM and blatant hoaxes Must demonstrate a sound understanding of notability...

13 September 2015 (UTC) Delete. Yet another article in the series of artspam for Joel Comm. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC) Weak...

106.207.189.201 (talk) 00:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC) Please review WP:ARTSPAM and WP:GNG to begin. Snowycats (talk) 02:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC) Piete Brooks (talk ·...

September 2009 (UTC) Delete. As above, not notable product. This is WP: ARTSPAM. --Whoosit (talk) 07:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Delete: I can't find significant...

(talk) 09:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC) WP:ARTSPAM: User Zhernovoi has claimed that the article appears to be WP:ARTSPAM (Advertising Spam). Wikipedia expalins...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) More WP:ARTSPAM from the producer of Dragon View (software). The claimed IDC paper is actually...

WP:GNG. WP:RS insufficient to support content or establish notability. WP:ARTSPAM--Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC) Hi Chrissy, I shared a...

an English encyclopedia. Delete per Wikipedia:Notability (music) and WP:ARTSPAM. Greg L (talk) 22:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC) He is not comparable to a Mongolian...

rewrite Endel ( company) article, regarding submission comments about ARTSPAM, but I don't understand, how should I rewrite page, to make it more clear...

submission also citing WP:COI, but with WP:ADV in the edit summary and WP:ARTSPAM on my talk page, so I have tried to address these concerns and resubmitted...

apart, having checked the sources I also am of the opinion that this is artspam. Multiple sources all saying more or less the same thing, multiple cites...

can often be salvaged by rewriting it in a neutral point of view." WP:ARTSPAM I think there is room for compromise here. @Wikicology: If the sources...

-- • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC) Delete - looks like WP:ARTSPAM to me. No Google news hits. Cocytus [»talk«] 02:28, 15 January 2010 (UTC)...

It's at best a violation of WP:ENT and at worst WP:SELFPROMOTE and/or WP:ARTSPAM. A few things that jumped out at me: "He is known for his androgynous presentation...

was (and largely still is) about a theory in a self-published book WP:ARTSPAM , so the guideline says it can be speedy deleted. It may help to checkout...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ARTSPAM. No indication of meeting WP:GNG. This is the stubbed version. The longer...

also has not. The numerous single-purpose accounts and promotional WP:ARTSPAM pages surrounding him smells of a case of using Wikipedia for advertising...

04:03, 11 November 2015 (UTC) Delete - non-notable, run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM by editor with undeclared conflict of interest. Undisclosed paid editing...

"unambiguous advertising or promotion," this article is basically a WP:ARTSPAM-type promotion of a corporate event. Created and editing almost solely...

from press releases created by the same account that created all the WP:ARTSPAM at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dragon_View_(software). Pcap ping 16:28...

editor who declined your article did a good job pointing you towards WP:ARTSPAM, which I suggest you take a look at. You may have a better chance of your...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Made-up word, obvious vehicle for WP:ARTSPAM of the company "Viscendo LLC," founded by Jody Basye. Borders (closely)...

January 2018 (UTC) delete does not meet notability requirements. promotional artspam. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

disqualified because they were all nude. Op-ed: We are drowning in promotional artspam Wikipedia has been gravitating towards a vehicle for business and product...

is salvageable — Frankie (talk) 17:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC) Delete Probably artspam attempt. When there's a title and a site that matches the title, that's...

Juliancolton | Talk 18:44, 14 November 2015 (UTC) Delete - run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM masquerading as an encyclopedia article. Undisclosed paid editing is prohibited...

Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC) Delete, per WP:ARTSPAM, hardly any coverage in mainstream sources. - DonCalo (talk) 14:53, 8 September...

don't feel that it passes WP:N. Simply put the article is very much WP:ARTSPAM. There is also some WP:OR in some areas where I highly doubt that there...

not shown that she is a remotely notable person, and this seems like WP:ARTSPAM.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 06:17, 3 January 2010 (UTC) Jedlicka is a known expert...

itself? No. --Calton | Talk 23:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC) Delete – more WP:ARTSPAM by WP:COI accounts in spite of our policies on what Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ARTSPAM, does fail WP:BIO and WP:GNG, looks further like COI Editing, had been...

Wikipedia with the Yellow Pages or a trade directory. Fails WP:ORG and is WP:ARTSPAM for a typical high street cram school for languages. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)...

articles are just thinly disguised SPAM. See here for more on that WP:ARTSPAM. I try to spend at least one night a week on what I refer to as Wiki Crank...

November 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete - WP:ARTSPAM Veryhuman (talk) 06:03, 17 November 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete - WP:ARTSPAM --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:25, 17...

comply with Neutral Point of View NPOV? Why didn't you tag as such WP:ARTSPAM if this is your main criterion for deletion? This could also be a helpful...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:ARTSPAM. How considerate of the article, it even gives us two links in the references...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No claim of notability made. Also appears to be WP:ARTSPAM - one of the major contributors, User:Tindaleoliver, clearly has a vested...

(UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE — MarkH21talk 15:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM that fails to meet WP:GNG inclusion requirements including WP:ANYBIO --Deepfriedokra...

article in toto is purely promotional, and it falls within the guideline WP:ARTSPAM as a "public relations piece[] designed to promote a[n] ... individual...

2 January 2018 (UTC) delete does not meet gng, anybio, lacks rs and is artspam. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 5 June 2013 (UTC) Delete Looks like WP:ARTSPAM. If there is a level of notability, add the material to the article with...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nothing more than WP:ARTSPAM, non-notable film festival, absolutely no real coverage. Praxidicae (talk)...

companies)#Special_note: advertising and promotion suggests some steps to follow. WP:ARTSPAM, unfortunately, isn't really illuminating as to what constitutes "advertisement...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ARTSPAM that serves only to promote the subject. Subject does not meet notability...

an English encyclopedia. Delete per Wikipedia:Notability (music) and WP:ARTSPAM. Greg L (talk) 22:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC) He is not comparable to a Mongolian...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Rejected at AfC as WP:ARTSPAM,moved into mainspace by main contributor. Reads like an advertisement,...

July 2011 (UTC) Delete. No evidence of notability. A neologism and WP:ARTSPAM. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 11:28, 17 July 2011 (UTC) Delete - it's a non-notable...

standard. The nom sort of accused you of Artspam, which is unfair. I believe you wrote the article (way before any Artspam problem) in good faith. The issue...

in the sources. Kleuske (talk) 16:13, 26 November 2016 (UTC) Delete as artspam. Full of peacock terms and PoV. The article was developed by a team of...

possibly be eligible but cleary fails WP:GNG. Deliberately created as artspam and has slipped throgh the net ever since. The only sources/links are still...

discussions. —RadioFan (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC) Delete Blatant WP:ARTSPAM. --Cybercobra (talk) 20:03, 22 September 2009 (UTC) Delete all of these...

Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 20 February 2010 (UTC) Delete. No sources, WP:OR, WP:ARTSPAM. Pcap ping 14:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

of WP:GS/Crypto. MER-C 20:25, 7 June 2018 (UTC) Delete. Weakly sourced ARTSPAM, fails NCORP/GNG, delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 21:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC)...

16:17, 13 August 2014 (UTC) Delete Not encyclopaedic. Looks possibly like artspam, but I can't say what for - perhaps the link never got posted. Otherwise...

is merely advertising masquerading as encyclopaedic content. Fails WP:ARTSPAM. Kb.au (talk) 11:08, 6 March 2018 (UTC) Delete The article reads like a...

2010 (UTC) Delete This is just an advert for the product, violating WP:ARTSPAM. Creator account has been blocked. Geoff Who, me? 13:24, 30 October 2010...

business. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:32, 12 May 2018 (UTC) Delete tedious WP:ARTSPAM, supposedly written by the company's now former PR Manager. Feel free to...

Advertising." I concur with the nominator, that the article qualifies as WP:ARTSPAM. It's nothing personal; just policy. Cindamuse (talk) 05:23, 18 August...

(talk) 18:24, 3 May 2021 (UTC) Delete: fails to satisfy WP:NCORP, indeed WP:ARTSPAM CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC) Merge to Gartner, the...

(talk) 09:16, 2 April 2018 (UTC) Delete I believe the G11 was appropriate. artspam.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC) PS fails Wikipedia:Notability...

should not have survived in the mainspace for three weeks. This is pure WP:ARTSPAM – that is, it is promotional in nature but disguised as a legitimate article...

was (and largely still is) about a theory in a self-published book WP:ARTSPAM , so the guideline says it can be speedy deleted. It may help to checkout...

Donald1659 (talk) 02:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC) Strong delete per others. WP:ARTSPAM by COI editors. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a marketing platform...

17:53, 26 March 2018 (UTC) Delete does not meet WP:GNG requirements. WP:artspam. Creator did a good job of creating native advertising. If only we could...

in-depth about the book, I agree that this article has issues with WP:ARTSPAM/WP:COATRACK and should be deleted. Smmurphy(Talk) 16:30, 31 March 2017...

of the deletion review. Deb (talk) 10:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Delete Artspam. Coverage is mostly from manufacturer. Lacks significant coverage to meet...

apart, having checked the sources I also am of the opinion that this is artspam. Multiple sources all saying more or less the same thing, multiple cites...

and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 16:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC) DELETE WP:ARTSPAM (not the worst I've seen) with promotional content not adequately sourced...

16:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC) Delete per nom and as wholly promotional WP:ARTSPAM. I tagged for WP:CSD#G11. No, it is not notable. It cannot and should not...

but it certainly fails WP:GNG, which is more than enough. Probably WP:ARTSPAM too. Andyjsmith (talk) 15:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

then and now is that this is some sort (never before saw the like) of WP:ARTSPAM. (Ah, well there it is in the deletion nomination. I knew there was a WP:COI...

Strong delete. The topic might be notable, but this article is just WP:ARTSPAM, just check links. I've removed one that had no contents whatsoever besides...

really reliable material. DGG ( talk ) 10:31, 17 July 2016 (UTC) Delete.. Artspam and/or vanity. Many thanks to Voceditenore for her meticulous investigation...

purposes, as was the article for his company, LendInvest. Run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM masquerading as encyclopedia articles. Undisclosed COI editing is prohibited...

delete. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM that I came close to deleting under WP:G11, but it is not "totally promotional...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:Artspam (about upcoming movie)inserted after posting created--Dlohcierekim (talk)...

discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC) delete veiled WP:artspam. Lacks WP:RS. Possibly WP:CSD#A11--Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:45, 28 March...

promotional article about a non-notable sport, failing policies at WP:ARTSPAM, WP:VER and WP:N. Googling "Guided chaos" and eliminating blogs, wikis...

October 2011 (UTC) Delete as with this user's other creations, this is WP:ARTSPAM. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PROMOTION. Yunshui 雲水 12:43, 28 October 2011 (UTC)...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC) Delete -- WP:TOOSOON / WP:ARTSPAM and mostly trivia as in: "As on April 26, 2017, the app has over 1 lakh...

speedy deletion itself are questionable here. See the proposed procedure WP:ARTSPAM: „Blatant examples of advertising masquerading as articles can be speedily...

run. Just my .02. Star Mississippi 21:13, 21 March 2022 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM worthy of WP:G11. Does not meet sourcing requirement for notability requirements...

Promotional article. FITINDIA 01:38, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM for non notable person--Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)...

timed 16:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Delete, it's advertising. WP:ARTSPAM. Haakon (talk) 16:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Delete No sources provided...

glance, you say, "wow, alright!" Then you look hard at the sourcing. WP:ARTSPAM.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:15, 25 July 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is...

think this passes, but barely. RayTalk 16:42, 20 April 2011 (UTC) Keep. WP:ARTSPAM content has been rewritten in accordance to WP:NPOV, and his other accomplishments...

(UTC) Addendum Creator asked me to look again at article. It's still WP:ARTSPAM and the added ref's do not cover the subject in significant depth. --Deepfriedokra...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ARTSPAM, does fail WP:BIO and WP:GNG, looks further like COI Editing, had been...

12:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC) Delete per nominator. Run-of-the-mill WP:ARTSPAM by conflict of interest editor. Subject lacks in-depth coverage in a breadth...

notable when noticed by the general marketplace, but for now I suspect WP:ARTSPAM. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Delete Same...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This appears to be wp:artspam for Rock the Post's new “Startup Investing” program. See the external link...

--Gwern (contribs) 19:56 10 January 2010 (GMT) UC4 is not FOSS, but it's WP:ARTSPAM written from press releases, by a well-known spammer. It just goes to show...

discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:58, 7 January 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:ARTSPAM. No independent coverage whatsoever, at least in English - fails WP:COMPANY...

require a complete rewrite to turn into a encyclopaedic article. See WP:ARTSPAM. If someone wants to completely rewrite it, then I may reconsider. -- Mattinbgn\talk...

claimants are product vendors, article gives the appearance of being WP:ARTSPAM. 24.177.123.74 (talk) 04:17, 29 January 2011 (UTC) Completing nomination...

and independent or in depth enough to meet inclusion criteria. And it is artspam.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:33, 27 June 2018 (UTC) Delete as promotional...

otherwise.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:43, 13 July 2021 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM piling on after coming from renamer queue. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:39...

JD Sports. Not notable enough for a standalone article and clearly WP:ARTSPAM created by single-purpose account. Citobun (talk) 10:14, 17 November 2015...

with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." Also, it is WP:ARTSPAM. While it does not meet my threshold for deleting under WP:G11, I would...

11:03, 25 November 2020 (UTC) Delete Does not meet WP:N in any variant. WP:ARTSPAM. Nominator sums things up well. Does meet my criteria for WP:G11, but as...

(talk) 13:22, 16 November 2011 (UTC) Speedy Delete . Clear case of WP:ARTSPAM. Have added new tag. Veryhuman (talk) 06:00, 17 November 2011 (UTC) Was...

manipulate the results. aeschyIus (talk) 02:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM promoting a non notable member of a political youth organization. As mentioned...

you have an actual reason to do so - you voted "provisional keep" for WP:ARTSPAM for no reason except you thought the others (who were correct) were espousing...

(talk) 01:45, 13 April 2012 (UTC) Delete per nom, WP:NOT, WP:MILL, and WP:ARTSPAM. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC) Keep and...

Unreferenced. No evidence of any notability . Fails WP:CORP. Looks like WP:ARTSPAM.  Velella  Velella Talk   21:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC) Delete per nom...

article are painfully obvious. Suggested reading: WP:NOTPROMOTION, WP:ARTSPAM, WP:NPOV. The article could easily have been speedily deleted for blatant...

00:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC) Delete per the above comments. Looks like WP:ARTSPAM and I haven't found any sources to establish notability. Giving an interview...

Delete - Judging by the creator's username, this is pretty blatant WP:ARTSPAM. The text is copied from the subject/creator's website (which is a piece...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Pure WP:ARTSPAM of a company that is "closely tied" to another company with no real in...

(UTC) delete lacks sufficient RS coverage to meet inclusion guidelines. Artspam. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

objectivity give credence to the nominator's assertion that this is WP:ARTSPAM. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 11:18, 20 November 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is...

be unambiguous advertising. I nominate the article under, WP:CV and WP:ARTSPAM. Gsingh (talk) 17:13, 15 April 2012 (UTC) Sorry the correct source appears...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is nothing more than covert artspam for reactivex and is specific only to this, basically a neologism and rife...

WER 01:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC) Delete - It appears to be unambiguous WP:ARTSPAM. The reliable sources listed only briefly mention Mr. Chewy in passing...

JSTOR · TWL) Renominating for the same reason as prior. Straight up WP:ARTSPAM with little coverage, mostly WP:MILL and press releases. Praxidicae (talk)...

paradox. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM. Fails WP:GNG. Honestly, not saying it is, but if this is the product of...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is some covert WP:ARTSPAM for a term that, as far as I can tell, isn't notable, widely used or covered...

JSTOR · TWL) No significant claim of notability. Also appears to be WP:ARTSPAM - page creator, User:Kyleflaherty, has a vested interest - see [12] Bazonka...

lottery", notability is not evident and the article is promotional WP:ARTSPAM. Previously deleted on 2018-04-09 under G11. Sam Sailor 08:23, 25 September...

minor memes. --Falcadore (talk) 12:32, 22 March 2011 (UTC) Delete, per WP:ARTSPAM. TheChrisD Rants•Edits 13:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC) Delete This isn't even...

JSTOR · TWL) Recreation by a WP:SPA of an article previously deleted as WP:ARTSPAM with the same problem. The subject might well be notable, I didn't even...

veteran, fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG, looked more to me like some kind of WP:ARTSPAM for his book. WP:BEFORE gave me nothing of independent sigcov. CommanderWaterford...

SwisterTwister talk 07:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC) Delete - appears to be WP:ARTSPAM created by single-purpose account. Citobun (talk) 07:26, 16 November 2015...

(UTC) Delete as not meeting notability guidelines. Content consists of WP:ARTSPAM w/o RS and w/o notability.12:52, 15 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

JSTOR · TWL) I think this is a case of WP:TOOSOON and a massive case of WP:ARTSPAM. There is a fair amount of hyper local coverage but little in the way of...

companies)#Special_note: advertising and promotion suggests some steps to follow. WP:ARTSPAM, unfortunately, isn't really illuminating as to what constitutes "advertisement...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:ARTSPAM: written like an advert, does not appear to meet WP:GNG, huge banner image...

October 2011 (UTC) Which part of WP:SPAM is being referred to? Is it WP:ARTSPAM? If so, how is the article considered in your opinion to be an advertisement...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ARTSPAM ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 11:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC) speedy under...

(talk) 23:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC) Delete. Clearly violates WP:NOTE and WP:ARTSPAM. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 23:59, 28 January 2011 (UTC) Keep. While the tone...

• Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC) Delete - Looks like WP:ARTSPAM but I could be wrong. -      Hydroxonium (talk) 09:18, 1 October 2010 (UTC)...

coverage in reliable sources. Article cites only the website itself. Pure WP:ARTSPAM. --Cybercobra (talk) 05:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC) Comment. Here's another...

article over and over. casualdejekyll 18:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Delete WP:ARTSPAM about subject lacking sufficient coverage in reliable, independent sources...

hallmarks of a commissioned work. It's quite obviously (to me at least) artspam - advertorial for a fashion firm masquerading as a Wikipedia BLP. All the...

Lambert (talk) 00:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC) Delete – run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM of non-notable subject. Article is single-purpose account who has made...

since I can't even see any claims of notability. Definitely breaks WP:ARTSPAM. Jonobennett (talk) 15:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC) Claiming to represent...

discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:15, 15 August 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:ARTSPAM. Reads like promotional material, and no evidence of notability. Dominus...

// have a cup // beans // 00:28, 25 March 2015 (UTC) Delete: obvious WP:ARTSPAM ("...simplify network processes, increase flexibility and control from...

(Createspace); no coverage in the news or in the book trade. This is blatant ARTSPAM. Yunshui (talk) 13:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC) Delete Clearly fails WP:NBOOKS...

Please do consider my arguments seriously. (unsigned by anon) DELETE per WP:ARTSPAM. --Redtigerxyz Talk 09:32, 3 March 2015 (UTC) Advice - What do you think...

this is a copy paste from the subject's own website. Cannt even call it "artspam". Just "spam". -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:21, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Note:...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Straight up WP:ARTSPAM with little coverage, mostly WP:MILL and press releases. Praxidicae (talk)...

(UTC) Delete Per norm. Not notable. looks like part of a PR campaign WP:ARTSPAM, subtle, but there.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:43, 15 July 2019 (UTC) The...

discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 05:10, 16 August 2015 (UTC) Delete. Looks like artspam. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:23, 16 August 2015 (UTC) Unfortunately delete...

the article should be rewritten to be less likely to be flagged under WP:ARTSPAM, as said by rburk41, it has enough third party verifiable references that...

114.150 (talk) 18:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC) Delete - run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM by single-purpose account. Undisclosed paid editing is prohibited by our...

discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC) STRONG Delete Per WP:ARTSPAM (creator of article has identical username to subject's Twitter account...

notable. Lacks sufficient in depth coverage. Trimmed down to stub from artspam.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:02, 23 March 2018 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NMUSIC...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not-notable subject, WP:ARTSPAM. Citobun (talk) 16:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC) Well, Category:Hotels and...

notability guideline which may or may not apply. Additionally, violates WP:ARTSPAM; the only content contributor is User:SpencerDouglass (talk), who is listed...

Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Delete informercial per WP:ARTSPAM. Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:28, 27 February 2013 (UTC) The above discussion...

Delete Maybe even Speedy Delete. This appears to be a promotional piece. WP:ARTSPAM --Jersey92 (talk) 03:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

barney barney (talk) 10:23, 21 April 2013 (UTC) Delete possibly speedily. Artspam - an apparent article whose only purpose is the link. (Interesting that...

also has not. The numerous single-purpose accounts and promotional WP:ARTSPAM pages surrounding him smells of a case of using Wikipedia for advertising...

sixtynine • whaddya want? • 15:56, 2 November 2022 (UTC) Make it so WP:ARTSPAM lacking coverage to meet inclusion requirements. Per above-- Deepfriedokra...

requirements. Subject does not meet notability requirements. This reads like artspam to me. Not averse to someone honoring the CSD's already on page. -- Dlohcierekim...

results with no indepth coverage in secondary sources. Run-of-the-mill WP:ARTSPAM. Citobun (talk) 10:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

meet [[WP:NCORP]] and [[WP:CORPDEPTH]]. In any case, it is discreet WP:ARTSPAM. Sam Sailor 18:51, 6 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

01:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC) Delete - non-notable, run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM by editor with undeclared conflict of interest. Undisclosed paid editing...

that.--Collingwood (talk) 11:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOT, WP:ARTSPAM and WP:COI. Wikipedia is NOT a "vehicle for advertising".--Hu12 (talk)...

this is an autobiography and almost certainly an advertisement - cf WP:ARTSPAM.  Velella  Velella Talk   19:18, 7 November 2011 (UTC) Delete No evidence...

overly promotional at present, but I don't think it's unsalvageable. Per WP:ARTSPAM, it could be salvaged by rewriting it in a neutral point of view, including...

22:17, 11 June 2013 (UTC) Delete Lacks notability. Article reads like WP:ARTSPAM. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

Dusti*Let's talk!* 00:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC) Delete - per WP:BLP, WP:ARTSPAM and WP:SYNTH. Most of the article is not only a PR puff piece, but is synthesized...

Federation′. --Gpkp (u • t • c) 04:01, 5 October 2018 (UTC) Delete this is WP:ARTSPAM and grossly fails WP:GNG. None of the sources have in depth coverage and...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article seems a classic case of WP:ARTSPAM - I have looked and can't find any evidence that it is inherently notable...

submission also citing WP:COI, but with WP:ADV in the edit summary and WP:ARTSPAM on my talk page, so I have tried to address these concerns and resubmitted...

deletion discussions. North America1000 10:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC) Delete. ARTSPAM sourced with NEWSPRIMARY, does not meet [[WP:NCORP]]/[[WP:CORPDEPTH]]....

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC) Delete Possible artspam. Definitely a list of apparently non-notable companies. There is currently...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ARTSPAM about company lacking significant coverage in reliable sources independent...

that it exists and organizes conferences. Highly POV style which fails WP:ARTSPAM. Not notable  Velella  Velella Talk   11:30, 5 December 2012 (UTC) Weak...

Only listed source is a promo website which makes me think this is WP:ARTSPAM. The article makes no clear claim to notability and a quick glance at Google...

HrafnTalkStalk(P) 08:40, 30 December 2010 (UTC) Delete - Seems like WP:ARTSPAM. Afro (Talk) 17:40, 30 December 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

a reliable source talking about subject. Fails Notability, possible WP:ARTSPAM Evano1van (talk) 07:41, 19 April 2013 (UTC) Delete: Clearly a non-notable...

can often be salvaged by rewriting it in a neutral point of view." WP:ARTSPAM I think there is room for compromise here. @Wikicology: If the sources...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable wp:artspam. Sources are not significant coverage to meet notability. Was tagged for...

not a thing of any consequence or reliability. Good (bad?) example of WP:ARTSPAM. No merits at all.  Velella  Velella Talk   14:55, 8 March 2012 (UTC) Delete...

Kudpung (talk · contribs) as G11: "Unambiguous advertising or promotion: G11 - artspam" (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 19:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC) Luciano...

Celestina007 (talk) 19:28, 7 May 2021 (UTC) Delete: per nom, indeed looks like WP:ARTSPAM, WP:BEFORE does not show up sigcov at all CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:26...

discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:19, 9 December 2014 (UTC) Delete: WP:ARTSPAM, WP:NOTESSAY. A strangely narrowly scoped essay promoting a product and...

stretch, only one hit in google news, and zero in books. Basically, WP:ARTSPAM. Pcap ping 06:18, 15 May 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...

context of this op-ed as advertisements masquerading as articles (in short, artspam) rather than external links spamming. The latter is more easily identifiable...

20:28, 20 January 2019 (UTC) DeleteARTSPAM. Even before the founder of the company got hold of it, it was artspam. Not eligible for A7 as prior decline...

subject of an encyclopaedia article. Specifically it fails WP:ORG, WP:ARTSPAM Andyjsmith (talk) 22:39, 24 September 2015 (UTC) Comment. I agree that...

clearly too much, and with the coverage being very uneven, including wp:ARTSPAM (articles that are merely spam). So that implies Piotrus is willing to...

interviews or financial coverage, none of which pass the test. Also WP:ARTSPAM. Praxidicae (talk) 15:38, 10 October 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

undisclosed paid editing org. GreenC 15:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC) *Delete as artspam and per nomination.. This is not a mainstream school. The major article...

can't find anything else that could establish his notability. Possible WP:ARTSPAM.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 08:28, 25 December 2009 (UTC) Delete There is no...

subscribers but there's nothing to back it up. Nothing more than corp/WP:ARTSPAM that lacks in any in depth, meaningful coverage in English or Arabic (I...

00:40, 11 November 2014 (UTC) Delete - It is pretty blatant WP:ARTSPAM. As the nominator has noted, the related Jamcracker article has been relentlessly...

~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:53, 16 May 2018 (UTC) delete carefully crafted WP:artspam. The cites and ref's are superficially misleading. One must delve deeper...

Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 13:19, 8 September 2013 (UTC) Delete, per WP:ARTSPAM - DonCalo (talk) 14:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

notable. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:13, 9 January 2018 (UTC) delete non notable. artspam. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Delete Agree with nom...

a reliable source talking about subject. Fails Notability, possible WP:ARTSPAM Evano1van (talk) 07:40, 19 April 2013 (UTC) Delete: Clearly fails WP:NOTABILITY...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ARTSPAM moved from Draft's by coi creator. Tagged for CSD for G11 but CSD "declined"...

15:22, 27 June 2012 (UTC) Delete per nom — full of WP:WIKIPUFFERY and WP:ARTSPAM. —JmaJeremyTALKCONTRIBS 19:58, 27 June 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...

because you have failed to explain how the article is WP:PROMO or WP:ARTSPAM. The onus is on you. TheKaphox T 21:54, 16 October 2016 (UTC) You read...

sandbox version per WP:G11. WP:A7 also looks defensible. Delete as WP:ARTSPAM about a subject who does not meet WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG, or WP:NMUSIC. The...

meet WP:N, though the article seems to be basically an advertisement WP:ARTSPAM. Assuming the article is accurate, they might well provide a service that...

Advertising." I concur with the nominator, that the article qualifies as WP:ARTSPAM. It's nothing personal; just policy. Cindamuse (talk) 05:23, 18 August...

tracks; the major problem now is one of educating the reviewers to recognise artspam and paid editing which for all intents and purposes look like legitimate...

coverage from reliable sources. Does not meet notability requirements. Just Artspam.Dlohcierekim's sock User talk:Dlohcierekim 04:58, 28 May 2018 (UTC) The...

purpose that would be great. SMC (talk) 14:16, 7 December 2009 (UTC) {{WP:ARTSPAM}} was stuffed in there, causing it to transclude the guideline. I would...

the only purpose this article serves at this point is as a coatrack for artspam. It contains no information that can't readily be found via Google, no...

13 September 2015 (UTC) Delete. Yet another article in the series of artspam for Joel Comm. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC) Weak...

discussions. Cliff Smith 04:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC) Subject appears to fail WP:ARTSPAM and WP:CORP. References consist of alphabetical listing with trivial coverage...

interest, such as military history. Op-ed We are drowning in promotional artspam 2015-04-08 Wikipedia has been gravitating towards a vehicle for business...

notability as required by WP:CORP. Much is is highly promotion and fails is WP:ARTSPAM  Velella  Velella Talk   20:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

enthusiastic student. It could even be by someone working for the ACA - artspam can come from normally respectable organisations. Whoever it's by, and...

June 2012 (UTC) Delete. Not just notability, also a case of WP:COI and WP:ARTSPAM. The creator seems to be on Wikipedia to promote his work, whether it be...

mentions, interviews or otherwise not independent, in depth coverage. Also WP:ARTSPAM. Praxidicae (talk) 17:42, 23 March 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

The first !vote states that the article qualifies for deletion as per WP:ARTSPAM, which is part of the Spam content guideline page. This essentially corresponds...

Wikipedia articles?", if not our 2015 Op-ed, "We are drowning in promotional artspam". Or maybe it was 2012 thing 1 thing 2 thing 3? In any case, we don't call...

f_interest_and_promotion_.5BJUNE_2009.5D. I believe this history of WP:ARTSPAM is not acceptable. LibStar (talk) 23:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC) Spiral Dynamics...

a misapplication of G11; a case could be made that this article was WP:ARTSPAM at AfD, but was it "unambiguous advertising"? Looking at the cached version...

sourced to absolute garbage masquerading as legitimate journalism. See WP:ARTSPAM. Now please enlighten me about this COI you've accused me and other editors...

(Contact Me, My Contribs) 17:09, 30 July 2009 (UTC) Take a look at the WP:ARTSPAM section - at the moment it looks like an article promoting NAPO and its...

purely for promoting the company talked about within the article (see WP:ARTSPAM and WP:NOTPROMO), as well as policies regarding conflicts of interest (see...

sourced to absolute garbage masquerading as legitimate journalism. See WP:ARTSPAM. Now please enlighten me about this COI you've accused me and other editors...

your draft read to much like an advertisement, and pointed to Wikipedia:ARTSPAM, the second rejection explained that the article was not suitable for an...

WP:ADVERTISEMENT, but that is a "disambiguation" of sorts. I think WP:ARTSPAM ("article spam") is more appropriate in these cases. Anon126 (talk - contribs)...

COI) 20:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC) Appears there has been an ongoing WP:ARTSPAM campaign intended to Seed wikipedia WP with numerous Non-Notable PrismTech...

links | watch | logs | views) is not so much a BLP as an almost blatant artspam for Elance/Upwork. Obviously written for and about themselves. This is...

vandalism. Ryeaasra (talk) 12:56, 7 September 2022 (UTC) Note: Unsoursced WP:ARTSPAM moved back to draft after creator moved to article space -- Deepfriedokra...

cannot be tracked or identified. Op-ed We are drowning in promotional artspam 2015-04-08 Wikipedia has been gravitating towards a vehicle for business...

talk:Deepfriedokra 02:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC) Note: Looks like WP:ARTSPAM. I've seen better sourced ARTSPAM. Looks like it fails WP:NCORP --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra...

and this. Some background. This article has a long history of COI, NPOV, ARTSPAM, and SOCK problems. The article was originally an advertisement that survived...

Permanently banned user Doctorlaw has come back with new sock puppets to push WP:ARTSPAM and is now continuing to edit and make legal threats through IPs. This...

(talk) 05:21, 16 March 2010 (UTC) I was the PRODder - it appears to be WP:ARTSPAM although I wasn't sure if it was blatant enough for CSD G11. Most of the...

paid for something... Smartse (talk) 01:52, 15 August 2009 (UTC) See WP:ARTSPAM which talks about advertisements masquerading as articles. The edits by...

be the same person) which is promotional in tone and a violation of WP:ARTSPAM. I have tried initiating discussion on both talkpages, as well as on the...

a misapplication of G11; a case could be made that this article was WP:ARTSPAM at AfD, but was it "unambiguous advertising"? Looking at the cached version...

revert to. GMGtalk 18:56, 4 September 2019 (UTC) Great Ghu! It's one big ARTSPAM. The first link is dead. This may or may not meet notability.-- Deepfriedokra...

of Chiropractic Credentials, etc.). To me, these look like blatant WP:ARTSPAM, places to list one's own company's designations. (I was drawn into this...

their user pages and sub-pages, and even their talk pages for posting artspam and their commercial links. Perhaps Cenarium's concerns about <div...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - looks like either WP:ARTSPAM or WP:BOOKSPAM (love the bit of text " says Freeman, a laughing, vigorous...

Wikipedia articles?", if not our 2015 Op-ed, "We are drowning in promotional artspam". Or maybe it was 2012 thing 1 thing 2 thing 3? In any case, we don't call...

Oaktree b (talk) 02:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC) Delete: per nom. Legacy WP:ARTSPAM that does not meet inclusion requirements.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:59...

Iskandar323 (talk) 10:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC) (edit conflict)Delete WP:ARTSPAM Does not meet inclusion criteria. Preys, purposefully or not, on the anguish...

puppetry -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:22, 2 June 2025 (UTC) Delete Unsourced WP:ARTSPAM. per nomination rationale.---- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:19, 2 June 2025...

COI/UPE? COI admitted but UPE denied by one sock. Had they not created WP:ARTSPAM, would we care? Noting for transparency that I came here from the unblock...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ARTSPAM sourced to subject and press releases, mostly. Other sources do not treat...

Bearcat (talk) 12:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC) Delete Poorly sourced WP:ARTSPAM does not meet any inclusion criteria one might name-- Deepfriedokra (talk)...