This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
ties to a topic and Retaining existing format. Shortcuts MOS:ARTCONMOS:ARTCON MOS:CONSISTENTMOS:CONSISTENT The conventions of a particular variety of...
Click to read more Ȥ Consistency within articles (MOS:CONSISTENTMOS:CONSISTENT, MOS:ARTCONMOS:ARTCON), on using a consistent variety of English within an article Wikipedia:Manual...
Click to read more »main body dates to fit British English in line with rest of article (MOS:ARTCON and MOS:DATETIES) Removed "Other theatre awards in London:" from see also...
Click to read more »reasonable approach may be to follow MOS:ENGVAR, particularly its aspects MOS:ARTCON, which holds that the spelling within a single article must be consistent...
Click to read more »inconsistencies, common sense has to wade through a world where WP:RETAIN, WP:ARTCON, WP:DATERET, and WP:STRONGNAT do not provide a consistent course of action...
Click to read more »article used lunar without initial capital, and they ought to know. MOS:ARTCON says the subject's own style should be followed, which is not helpful as...
Click to read more »particular MOS:RETAIN? (Your argument could be seen as a variation of MOS:ARTCON, except that strictly speaking isn't relevant here, since the name of a...
Click to read more »occasionally, in any context, but especially in formal contexts; thus WP:ARTCON. It won't bother me if you want to revert some of my edits back to "United...
Click to read more »MOS? -DePiep (talk) 09:02, 30 September 2019 (UTC) There's already MOS:ARTCON for MOS:CONSISTENCY (National varieties of English:Consistency within articles)...
Click to read more »17:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC) Then again, Jaguar, I do see where the WP:ARTCON subsection of WP:ENGVAR can be taken to mean that everything except the...
Click to read more »2602:24A:DE47:BB20:50DE:F402:42A6:A17D (talk) 21:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC) MOS:ARTCON, however, states quite explicitly: "Within a given article the conventions...
Click to read more »"articles". And we use ART to mean "article" in various other shortcuts (WP:ARTCON, etc.). So, ARTSPAM and SPAMART are entirely reasonable shortcuts, given...
Click to read more »capitalized and the other not, in the same article/category/list/context (see MOS:ARTCON, WP:CONSISTENT). The main argument for capitalizing both is that they are...
Click to read more »against, which were untrue (demonstrably so) as well as irrelevant (WP:ARTCON). Second, I've never witnessed any admin reverting a closure by a non-admin...
Click to read more »constitency Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Not so! See MOS:ARTCON. The MOS does not support consistency between articles: If it did then all...
Click to read more »03:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC) It's there because of WP:ENGVAR and MOS:ARTCON. I write in Canadian English, and try to standardize the articles I write...
Click to read more »be done in cases like this? Kdammers (talk) 15:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC) WP:ARTCON, follow one variety consistently. Use the spelling/variety used in the article...
Click to read more »Especially because it might conflict with MOS:ENGVAR and specifically MOS:ARTCON and MOS:TIES. The sport of association football is referred to as "football"...
Click to read more »WP:DELETE; however, you should also take a look at WP:BEFORE, WP:NEXIST and WP:ARTCON before doing so. You might also want to post a query on the talk page of...
Click to read more »little digging to figure out. Regardless of which format/variety is used, WP:ARTCON (at least within the particular article and then perhaps to some degree...
Click to read more »{{1970s-litnovel-stub}} {{AfricanUnion-stub}} Category:Antibiotic stubs {{artcon-stub}} {{Australia-athletics-bio-stub}} Category:Australian composer stubs...
Click to read more »there's pretty much only one type of "finger picked". Changed favorite per WP:ARTCON. GeraldWL 04:11, 29 August 2023 (UTC) 5: OKish. 6: Not much from this source...
Click to read more »has the word "utilising", but has American English here. To satisfy MOS:ARTCON, one national variety should be used. As this is an American program, my...
Click to read more »day! Maineartists (talk) 11:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC) In keeping with WP:ARTCON, we should either always use "Luftwaffe" for the air force of 1935-1945...
Click to read more »This is an archive page for Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub Sorting. Please move completed August discussions to this page as they occur, add discussion headers...
Click to read more »Jackpaulryan (talk) 00:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Hello again, Jackpaulryan. MOS:ARTCON says While Wikipedia does not prefer any national variety of English, within...
Click to read more »warring – Discussion as to whether this article should be an exception to WP:ARTCON is at Talk:Driver's license#Spelling/terminology consensus. Please protect...
Click to read more »03:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC) It's there because of WP:ENGVAR and MOS:ARTCON. I write in Canadian English, and try to standardize the articles I write...
Click to read more »17:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC) Then again, Jaguar, I do see where the WP:ARTCON subsection of WP:ENGVAR can be taken to mean that everything except the...
Click to read more »have smaller wing bones than flying birds of similar size. Spelling (MOS:ARTCON) Write titles/quotes as given in the source. For proper names, use the subject's...
Click to read more »occasionally, in any context, but especially in formal contexts; thus WP:ARTCON. It won't bother me if you want to revert some of my edits back to "United...
Click to read more »MOS:SO, MOS:HEAD) No particular advice. English variant (MOS:ENGVAR, MOS:ARTCON, MOS:COMMONALITY, MOS:TIES, MOS:RETAIN) Use Belizean English consistently...
Click to read more »has the word "utilising", but has American English here. To satisfy MOS:ARTCON, one national variety should be used. As this is an American program, my...
Click to read more »better. The second of the bullet-points above is frankly daft; we have MOS:ARTCON for a reason, and this bullet would force Dicklyon to violate it. I warned...
Click to read more »null 21 May 2026 MOS talk null Editor sought clarification on ENGVAR or ARTCON 17 Apr 2026 TfD delete {{Ugandan English}} Nominated because {{Use Ugandan...
Click to read more »contributor to an article. In-article consistency is important per things per WP:ARTCON and WP:DATEUNIFY, but simply changing a previously established style just...
Click to read more »Ragasa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Reason: editwarring over WP:ARTCON and unsourced changes. Borgenland (talk) 14:28, 23 September 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »MOS:SO, MOS:HEAD) No particular advice. English variant (MOS:ENGVAR, MOS:ARTCON, MOS:COMMONALITY, MOS:TIES, MOS:RETAIN) Use Belizean English consistently...
Click to read more »there's pretty much only one type of "finger picked". Changed favorite per WP:ARTCON. GeraldWL 04:11, 29 August 2023 (UTC) 5: OKish. 6: Not much from this source...
Click to read more »