Search Results: Wikipedia:ARCHISEEK


Wikipedia:New pages patrol source guide
Sabtu, 2026-08-22 13:43:13

reliable for pop culture coverage per a September 2025 RSN discussion. Archiseek [1,184], small consensus that the author is a subject-matter expert for...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 October 30
Senin, 2023-02-27 23:04:45

2011 (UTC) Frederick William Stevens (history · last edit) from http://archiseek.com/2010/1886-great-indian-peninsular-railway-terminus-administrative...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Winnipeg/archive1
Rabu, 2008-02-20 18:45:41

does it mean that Winnipeg has “supported” Hollywood films? ”See also: Archiseek: Winnipeg” should be a proper footnote or in the external links section...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/retratoiberico.com
Kamis, 2008-04-24 19:31:56

retratoiberico.com/galeria/gallery.asp?categoryid=5337 (42, 4, 1, 1) spain.archiseek.com/catalunya/barcelona/index.html (42, 1, 1, 1) www.bcn.cat/ (42, 8,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/portal.unesco.org
Rabu, 2008-04-23 19:31:45

1) www.panorama-cities.net/berlin/berlin.html (922, 7, 1, 1) germany.archiseek.com/brandenburg/berlin/index.html (922, 3, 1, 1) www.exberliner.com (922...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/maps.google.com
Rabu, 2022-12-07 14:00:06

1) www.panorama-cities.net/berlin/berlin.html (922, 7, 1, 1) germany.archiseek.com/brandenburg/berlin/index.html (922, 3, 1, 1) www.exberliner.com (922...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/links.jstor.org
Kamis, 2022-12-08 02:55:56

1) vancouverhistory.ca/archives_rattenbury.htm (784, 13, 8, 1) canada.archiseek.com/british_columbia/vancouver/marine_building.html (784, 8, 2, 1) discovervancouver...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/vpl.ca
Kamis, 2022-10-06 20:55:44

discovervancouver.com/gvb/notable-buildings.asp (-1, 208, X, X R/X/L) canada.archiseek.com/british_columbia/vancouver/marine_building.html (-1, 61, X, X R/X/L)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/COIReports/2009, Jun 6
Minggu, 2009-06-07 06:54:50

(redirectsite) ireland.archiseek.com/buildings_ir on domain ireland.archiseek.com is a redirectsite for www.archiseek.com/404.html on archiseek.com 14:22:33, Sat...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 March
Rabu, 2011-03-23 06:56:05

article by the way). I have requested explanations from a website named archiseek where many conversations about the issue were raised. The conversations...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request/Archive 178
Sabtu, 2026-06-06 13:54:43

copy of the image reproduced with watermark and at low resolution, on Archiseek. Please can someone provide that image or, preferably, the set of missing...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 March 24
Senin, 2022-03-21 21:18:57

article by the way). I have requested explanations from a website named archiseek where many conversations about the issue were raised. The conversations...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 514
Selasa, 2026-05-12 00:42:07

WP:EXPERTSPS. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 21:05, 4 May 2026 (UTC) Is Archiseek considered reliable? I've seen it on countless articles (Eg. Ireland ref...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Historical archive/Logs/Deletion log/June 2004 (3)
Minggu, 2026-03-01 23:30:35

Jimregan deleted "Ciutadella" (content was: '{{copyvio1}}http://spain.archiseek.com/balearics/menorca/ciudadela/index.html{{copyvio2}}[[User:Francs2000|Graham...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Historical archive/Logs/Deletion log/June 2004 (2)
Senin, 2026-06-15 17:49:01

deleted "Ciutadella" (content was: '== External Links ==*[http://spain.archiseek.com/balearics/menorca/ciudadela/index.html Architecture of Ciudadela]')...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/January 2007
Kamis, 2008-05-22 05:33:22

does it mean that Winnipeg has “supported” Hollywood films? ”See also: Archiseek: Winnipeg” should be a proper footnote or in the external links section...

Click to read more »