This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Shortcuts WP:ARBINDWP:ARBIND WP:ARBPAKWP:ARBPAK WP:ARBIPWP:ARBIP Case opened on 21:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC) Case closed on 21:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »aware that India and Pakistan are subject to discretionary sanctions and WP:ARBIP because of persistent disruptive editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:53,...
Click to read more »(ev / t) (w / t) (pd / t) Clauses to which an amendment is requested WP:ARBIP#Remedies List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation...
Click to read more »15:47, 29 November 2014 (UTC) Result: User:Md iet is topic banned under WP:ARBIP from anything to do with the Dawoodi Bohra, on all pages of Wikipedia. He...
Click to read more »incorporating this community sanction into the existing ArbCom-imposed WP:ARBIP sanctions regime under the new standardised rules, to reduce red tape and...
Click to read more »account to restore POV content. Since this article is in the domain of WP:ARBIP discretionary sanction, I would like the closing admin to please at least...
Click to read more »protection enforcement at administrator discretion continues under the ARBIP regime. Mixed martial arts AN discussion (WP:GS/MMA) All pages within the...
Click to read more »inappropriate behavior will lead to sanctions. This warning will be logged to WP:ARBIP. Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:01, 28 November 2013 (UTC) The following discussion...
Click to read more »sections above. Please note that I have added Rape in Kashmir Insurgency to ARBIP/Ds. But while it is now subject to 1RR, it wasn't at the time this report...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBIP Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »template? The topic ban was issued according to discretionary sanctions for WP:ARBIP. Mathsci (talk) 09:18, 22 June 2013 (UTC) Discretionary sanctions may also...
Click to read more »15 November 2014 (UTC) Correct and article was always under Wikipedia:ARBIP because it has WikiProject-India. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:21, 15 November...
Click to read more »akin to slapping on, say, the {{WikiProject India}} template across the WP:ARBIP pages. More broadly: right now we only have a how-to place guideline about...
Click to read more »note that he had been warned about possible discretionary sanctions in WP:ARBIP territory. De728631 (talk) 20:04, 10 August 2014 (UTC) It's no excuse for...
Click to read more »WP:Requests for page protection/Decrease - we're getting a flood of WP:ARBIP drive-by partisans spamming requests for The Kashmir Files on those two...
Click to read more »Israeli topics so need to be removed from them. I'll impose a topic ban from ARBIP topics in around 24 hours so others (including Avaya1) can comment. Callanecc...
Click to read more »in South Asia), WP:GS/IPAK (covers the India-Pakistan conflict), and WP:ARBIP (covers the entire countries). That really could use some reform and narrowing...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBIP Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBIP Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBIP : Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »disharmony". The page is also under two separate administrative sanctions, WP:ARBIP and WP:GS/CASTE. Chariotrider555 (talk) 03:41, 4 May 2021 (UTC) There was...
Click to read more »sections above. I guess I'm struggling to figure out a connection to WP:ARBIP — that article is not under (any) discretionary sanctions El_C 19:13, 18...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced Wikipedia:ARBIP Diffs and explanations of problem User:Darkness Shines completely transformed...
Click to read more »AcidSnow and Khabboos are notified of discretionary sanctions (Wikipedia:ARBIP#Standard_discretionary_sanctions). ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 18:20, 14...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced Wikipedia:ARBIP : Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »and I have made a decision. I am therefore enacting a topic ban under WP:ARBIP with respect to you and the article Ahmad Shah Massoud and contents of other...
Click to read more »there is significant concern re: !Vote stacking and hounding TG in the WP:ARBIP area for me to raise an eyebrow. Furthermore the interaction issue between...
Click to read more »C[37]. --regentspark (comment) 17:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC) I also added ARBIP/Ds to Kashmir, Jammu and Kashmir, Azad Kashmir, Insurgency in Jammu and...
Click to read more »arbitration enforcement, whose resources are needed in areas such as WP:ARBIP. Third, the ArbCom can use Remedy 1, knowing that Roger Davies can take...
Click to read more »"suitable candidate for ArbCom". ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ Are you aware about WP:ARBIP? India-Pakistan conflict related topics are few of most sensitive areas...
Click to read more »editing in that area, because it is subject to discretionary sanctions under ARBIP, and be sure not to engage in edit-warring or tendentious editing. If you...
Click to read more »Memon, thanks for your efforts on that article. That article was under WP:ARBIP. Are you willing to intervene in India-Pakistan conflict related topics...
Click to read more »Reason These switches are a very common low level breach of ARBPIA and ARBIP and not easy to spot. This would aid editors to spot possible breaches and...
Click to read more »"suitable candidate for ArbCom". ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ Are you aware about WP:ARBIP? India-Pakistan conflict related topics are few of most sensitive areas...
Click to read more »Reason These switches are a very common low level breach of ARBPIA and ARBIP and not easy to spot. This would aid editors to spot possible breaches and...
Click to read more »Memon, thanks for your efforts on that article. That article was under WP:ARBIP. Are you willing to intervene in India-Pakistan conflict related topics...
Click to read more »Temporary extended-confirmed protection: This article is currently under the WP:ARBIP discretionary sanctions. Since the Fall of Kabul (2021), it has attracted...
Click to read more »last PP and is not going away anytime soon, article is covered under WP:ARBIP. Asking for long-term ECP. Gotitbro (talk) 10:35, 5 December 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »watch | logs) Reason: Persistent disruption by IPs and new accounts on WP:ARBIP article. FDW777 (talk) 10:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC) Rather low edit rate (last...
Click to read more »Confirmed Protection seems to have run out. See also: Page history and WP:ARBIP. INDT (talk) 07:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC) Done. Logged AE action. El_C 11:22...
Click to read more »watch | logs) Extended confirmed protection: Reverts this year; also per WP:ARBIP (not to be confused with the other). George Ho (talk) 07:06, 25 December...
Click to read more »Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Related to both WP:ARBIP and WP:ARBPIA4. InvalidOS (talk) 15:42, 24 February 2020 (UTC) Declined...
Click to read more »Persistent disruptive edits by anon editors. The page is under the purview of ARBIP 1RR restriction. SMS Talk 09:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC) Semi-protected...
Click to read more »talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff top) - Link: gumroad.com/l/ArbIP (R/Xmeta/L) 2020-04-25 17:17:59 (UTC): User Zaripov999 t • c • dc • l •...
Click to read more »August 2020 (UTC) @NedFausa:, there is no need for squeezing this under ARBIP since BLP are already covered by authorized Discretionary Sanctions. If...
Click to read more »Aryan Valley and Talk:Aryan Valley per discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBIP, as noted in discussion. Daniel Case (talk) 20:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »partisan claims and little independent confirmation of the facts. Per WP:ARBIP, India/Pakistan is a controversial topic and so care and caution is required...
Click to read more »WP:ARBIP The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. Support - This is a major symbolic topic for Hindus and has been a major agenda...
Click to read more »user was blocked four times for similar behaviour and not abiding by WP:ARBIP. Their editing history and the talk page warnings and discussions is a testament...
Click to read more »(UTC) Which sanctions? Ymblanter (talk) 13:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC) WP:ARBIP. Daniel Case (talk) 21:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC) But these just introduce...
Click to read more »tried then WP:PERP per applies. And as this is a contentious topic per WP:ARBIP, we should not be jumping to conclusions and acting like we have all the...
Click to read more »"Ethnic conflicts in Western and Southern Asia" which would include WP:ARBIP, WP:AA2, WP:GS/AA, WP:KURDS, WP:ARBPIA4, WP:GS/ISIL, and possible WP:UYGHUR...
Click to read more »apathy towards Wikipedia rules and guidelines. A clear violation of WP:ARBIP and a serious case of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. While it started of as disregard...
Click to read more »after seeing that all of your edits are in contentious topics under WP:ARBIP. @Ivanvector: can you please check the replies Azmarai76 has so far made...
Click to read more »article is also subject to sockpuppetry/meatpuppetry and is part of WP:ARBIP. Nomian (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC). Nomian (talk) 00:28, 11 January...
Click to read more »people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Semi-protection: per WP:ARBIP. JayCubby 22:08, 23 December 2024 (UTC) Semi-protected for a period of 1...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBIP Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »