Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Shortcut WP:ARBGGWP:ARBGG Main case page (talk) — Evidence (talk) — Workshop (talk) — Proposed decision (talk) Case clerks: Ks0stm (talk) & Sphilbrick...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:ARBGGWP:ARBGG Main case page (talk) — Evidence (talk) — Workshop (talk) — Proposed decision (talk) Case clerks: Ks0stm (talk) & Sphilbrick...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:ARBGGWP:ARBGG Main case page (talk) — Evidence (talk) — Workshop (talk) — Proposed decision (talk) Case clerks: Ks0stm (talk) & Sphilbrick...
Click to read more »that topic at this stage. Please fix this. You were given the tools at WP:ARBGG. --TS 01:53, 25 February 2015 (UTC) As I read this, the issue here is primarily...
Click to read more »Arbitration Committee sanctions, see this page. For the specific Committee decision that rescinded or modified these community sanctions, see WP:ARBGG....
Click to read more »by far the most active, including scores of edits at the contentious WP:ARBGG case.[1]. Through lengthy discussion it's clear that this user has a familiarity...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:ARBGGWP:ARBGG Main case page (talk) — Evidence (talk) — Workshop (talk) — Proposed decision (talk) Case clerks: Ks0stm (talk) & Sphilbrick...
Click to read more »I've had cause to visit AN/I since. That last one related to Wikipedia:ARBGG and yes, it was stressful at the time. When challenged, as I was, I will...
Click to read more »repeated BLP violations requiring suppression; logged under both NEWBLPBAN and ARBGG. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »Canens (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2015 (UTC) That's interesting, because WP:ARBGG##Sanctions available, point vii, says "Discretionary sanctions permit full...
Click to read more »(pd / t) Clauses to which an amendment is requested WP:ARBGG#Parties topic-banned by the community WP:ARBGG#ArmyLine, DungeonSiegeAddict510, and Xander756 topic-banned...
Click to read more »boards" (up to and including ArbCom with recent rulings in WP:ARBGGTF, WP:ARBGG, WP:ARBAE2, and the earlier PFC Manning naming dispute). Indeed, at the...
Click to read more »supporters don't like. Warmly received at RationalWiki following Wikipedia's ARBGG case, you seem to have made something of a home for yourself there. At a...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) User:The Devil's Advocate is restricted per the remedies of WP:ARBGG: 8.4) Subject to the usual exceptions, The Devil's Advocate is indefinitely...
Click to read more »2016 (UTC) Support The 500/30 restriction has already been applied to WP:ARBGG and WP:ARBPIA topics and it has very successful at reducing disruption....
Click to read more »supporters don't like. Warmly received at RationalWiki following Wikipedia's ARBGG case, you seem to have made something of a home for yourself there. At a...
Click to read more »change. While I admit that I have not recently been monitoring behavior on ARBGG-related articles, this looks like a normal BRD cycle to me. Certainly 1RR...
Click to read more »bizarre. PetertheFourth's absence of substantial contributions outside the WP:ARBGG discretionary sanctions topic space should also be noted. - Ryk72 'c.s.n...
Click to read more »decide if this article should be placed under Gamergate restrictions per WP:ARBGG#Remedies. EdJohnston (talk) 04:23, 19 May 2015 (UTC) GamerGate restrictions...
Click to read more »political reasons. [101] Already blocked by SarekOfVulcan. I think an WP:ARBGG topic ban is also in order here. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:06, 27 July...
Click to read more »reconsideration after not less than three months. HJ Mitchell Upon closure of WP:ARBGG Loganmac 02 January 2015 Caution Cautioned against making personally directed...
Click to read more »all occurred since he was notified of ARBGG on 13 February. So in my opinion this is a valid complaint under ARBGG. EdJohnston (talk) 16:58, 24 February...
Click to read more »July 2015 (UTC) Hi Tom Harrison, This is an excellent question. Under WP:ARBGG, The Devil's Advocate is indeed indefinitely prohibited from editing any...
Click to read more »the Gamergate restrictions that are now codified in WP:ARBGG. While I concur that the WP:ARBGG decision was intended to address a number of problematic...
Click to read more »either topic closely, this protection framework has proven effective in WP:ARBGG and WP:ARBPIA, two of our most heated topic areas. It makes sense that this...
Click to read more »LGBT rights in Europe and LGBT rights in South Korea, noting obcious WP:ARBGG facets, but otherwise an un-logged action. El_C 21:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »apologized, and he was given a pass on that basis. 4. An ArbCom case (WP:ARBGG) was requested regarding the whole GamerGate fiasco on November 9th, and...
Click to read more »subject. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC) While I think WP:ARBGG discretionary sanctions encompass the MRMPS, I think we would need an WP:...
Click to read more »editnotice cautioning any editors seeking to make changes, and standard ARBGG discretionary sanctions notices for the editors in the listed group. If...
Click to read more »Gamergate controversy and related articles including biographies (see WP:ARBGG FoF #1). I don't think Fae's point that the GG arbitration case superseded...
Click to read more »(talk) 13:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC) Girth Summit, it is already covered by WP:ARBGG, so you are already authorized to apply the discretionary sanctions as you...
Click to read more »am more inclined to serve you both a no-fault interaction ban under WP:ARBGG in the interest of allowing other interested editors to edit these topics...
Click to read more »Irreversible Damage which deals with transgender topics (and thus falls under ARBGG per Manning naming dispute). As laid out at guide.expect, editors are expected...
Click to read more »them, but that is not possible in practice. Off-wiki campaigning (and WP:ARBGG) has trained activists in how to be civil in the hope of provoking sanctionable...
Click to read more »diffs relate to content about sexual misconduct allegations in BLPs. (WP:ARBGG, WP:ARBBLP) Diffs 4 & 5 also fall under WP:ARBAPDS. The evidence shows highlights...
Click to read more »complaining again. ArmyLine is under an indefinite topic ban from gamergate (WP:ARBGG Remedies), and TyTyMang is yet another returned user who focuses on drama...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBGG the bit about discretionary sanctions: Diffs of edits that violate this...
Click to read more »as a matter of WP:ARBIPA discretionary sanctions, and possibly under WP:ARBGG discretionary sanctions too. On the civility side alone, I'm finding a 72h...
Click to read more »be Arbitration Enforcement under the gender-related sanctions under WP:ARBGG. But I suggest that mediation be tried. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:06, 17...
Click to read more »should have blocked editors whose only interested was to participate in the ARBGG drama. And indeed, this is a gender-related topic, with its discretionary...
Click to read more »regardless, so it is independently subject to the expanded scope of WP:ARBGG (including sexuality and gender, broadly), and Fæ is subject to those DS...
Click to read more »been closed. Please do not modify it. Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBGG Margot (activist) is the article for a Polish non-binary LGBTQIA activist...
Click to read more »I continue to believe that this article is not within the scope of WP:ARBGG, except for the snippets dealing with allegations of gender bias. The WordsmithTalk...
Click to read more »User:Itsmeront has done a cut-and-paste from an unrelated posting about ARBGG at WP:AE#Roscelese and brought it here. Unless Itsmeront is willing to revert...
Click to read more »that the block should stand as it's clear that the "campaign to neuter the ARBGG decision of anything that is directed to GG supporters" is clearly underway...
Click to read more »date." And rape-related articles do appear to be within the scope of WP:ARBGG per this clarification request here: Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Request...
Click to read more »is not eligible. Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:21, 17 April 2016 (UTC) WP:ARBGG did not authorise a blanket 30/500 restriction as in WP:ARBPIA. However...
Click to read more »the edits to anything related to gender politics are problematic. Per WP:ARBGG I think we are into final warning before topic ban territory; I placed a...
Click to read more »been given. Arbcom voted 12���nil to indefinitely topic-ban ArmyLine (see ARBGG). A topic ban includes the fact that the editor must not launch ANI reports...
Click to read more »ban from abortion (WP:ARBAB) and gender politics including GamerGate (WP:ARBGG), and a one-way interaction ban from Beyond My Ken. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits)...
Click to read more »the topic of Female genital mutilation is now understood to fall under WP:ARBGG, per this October 2018 ban of Muffizainu. In that AE thread, the closing...
Click to read more »(UTC) The article in question is one of a series of contentious pages (WP:ARBGG) where each comma is fought over. In a case like that, it is unacceptable...
Click to read more »having read the background content, I'm wondering if a brandishing the ARBGG Discretionary Sanctions might restore some order and let others have their...
Click to read more »all are trolling/vandalism on topics under discretionary sanctions per WP:ARBGG and WP:ARBAP2 respectively. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:08, 24 March 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »to this discussion. I have indefinitely topic banned Awoma from the WP:ARBGG (likely soon to be re-named "Gender and sexuality") topic area, broadly...
Click to read more »would have worked long ago.' 14:32, 24 January 2020 – Ivanvector warns of ARBGG I-ban, and "WanderingWanda, this is your opportunity to disengage. I would...
Click to read more »accusing the person of harassment) but they are not all related to the ARBGG topic area. @Miacek: I actually found your Beta provider article while compiling...
Click to read more »variety WP:CIV and WP:NPA type complaints, not obviously specific to WP:ARBGG editing. I'm not saying one way or the other whether or not the behavior...
Click to read more »discretion to include specific talk pages). Wording should be the same as the ARBGG 500/30 rule if that is possible. For comparison, here is the scope of the...
Click to read more »controversy and gender issues is clearly there[81][82]. Anyone banned under ARBGG's ruling should not be making these kinds of edits--Cailil talk 22:17, 12...
Click to read more »editors here claiming they are 'new', but were probably topic banned by ARBGG, not to mention the 1,000 edit 1 year conditions. That is all. Dave Dial...
Click to read more »Apokrif (talk) 21:44, 29 November 2018 (UTC) I've just created a redirect. WP:ARBGG redirects there, so it should be appropriate. wumbolo ^^^ 21:46, 29 November...
Click to read more »other agenda. In fact, I posted words of support for Gamaliel during WP:ARBGG [11] and have prevously petitioned for deletion of attack pages I stumbled...
Click to read more »for a period of 30 days. An exception is made for participating at WP:ARBGG (on 06 December 2014 per enforcement request) The Wordsmith. Kitsunedawn...
Click to read more »intentions", and however well intentioned the lobbying to reduce the scope of the ARBGG bans it's missing the point. The GG fiasco was due to the complete lack...
Click to read more »editors here claiming they are 'new', but were probably topic banned by ARBGG, not to mention the 1,000 edit 1 year conditions. That is all. Dave Dial...
Click to read more »time. These cases are exceedingly rare; the last one I can think of was ARBGG. In these cases, topic ban are sometimes warranted if the behavior of new...
Click to read more »biographies of living persons), ARBPS (as amended to cover all fringe matters), ARBGG (originally GamerGate, but since scope-expanded in actual application to...
Click to read more »all trans people which, if continued, would warrant sanctions under WP:ARBGG. The issue of whether mentioning a "trans ideology" among off-wiki activists...
Click to read more »time. These cases are exceedingly rare; the last one I can think of was ARBGG. In these cases, topic ban are sometimes warranted if the behavior of new...
Click to read more »Xilo (talk) 22:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC) Done. Logged AE action. Wow, WP:ARBGG at WP:GENSEX, for once. El_C 23:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC) Lekë Dukagjini (edit...
Click to read more »ones who'd be able to immediately parse this request due to the recent WP:ARBGG rename. El_C 15:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC) Just to note, I've made the edits...
Click to read more »WP:ARBSAQ, it's for an unrelated issue. This would be something like WP:ARBGG, if anything, but I don't think it applies or I'd have requested a babysitter...
Click to read more »standards, I blocked an admin during the mess that was GamerGate (cf. WP:ARBGG, think Arab-Israeli dispute but everyone involved is computer literate and...
Click to read more »In case of further trouble the page is covered by WP:ARBBLP and WP:ARBGG. EdJohnston (talk) 23:22, 17 March 2018 (UTC) Daniel Biss (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »since become WP:INVOLVED in editing the page. This is covered by the WP:ARBGG discretionary sanctions, and when this was last protected five days ago...
Click to read more »standards, I blocked an admin during the mess that was GamerGate (cf. WP:ARBGG, think Arab-Israeli dispute but everyone involved is computer literate and...
Click to read more »actually settles the matter. As this matter crosses both WP:ARBMOS and WP:ARBGG discretionary sanctions lines, we should err on the side of stopping further...
Click to read more »Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Under WP:ARBGG - this article concerns the BLP subject J. K. Rowling, who has recently...
Click to read more »protected. Am I wrong? Peter Sam Fan 18:31, 21 April 2016 (UTC) Yes. WP:ARBGG did not authorise a blanket 30/500 restriction as in WP:ARBPIA3. BethNaught...
Click to read more »Nothing in that wording suggests that it only applies to off-WP politics. WP:ARBGG: "Use of the site to pursue feuds and quarrels is extremely disruptive,...
Click to read more »biographies of living persons), ARBPS (as amended to cover all fringe matters), ARBGG (originally GamerGate, but since scope-expanded in actual application to...
Click to read more »for a period of 30 days. An exception is made for participating at WP:ARBGG. The WordsmithTalk to me 20:35, 6 December 2014 (UTC) @DHeyward: and @The...
Click to read more »light of the case. Comments by arbitrators: Comments by parties: From WP:ARBGG Lightbreather (talk) 16:32, 21 August 2026 (UTC) Comments by others: Endorse...
Click to read more »to be or self-identifying as transgender In 2015, the Gamergate case (WP:ARBGG) authorized discretionary sanctions stating Any editor subject to a topic-ban...
Click to read more »2021-09-24 Arbitration enforcement: GG, everyone! See what I did there? WP:ARBGG we hardly knew ye Kirk Hammett El C 2021-09-25 Violations of the biographies...
Click to read more »guide reminds me. One of those occasions was just over four years ago, was ARBGG-related, started with a damning indictment and discussions about just what...
Click to read more »I've had cause to visit AN/I since. That last one related to Wikipedia:ARBGG and yes, it was stressful at the time. When challenged, as I was, I will...
Click to read more »01:51, 28 January 2023 (UTC) Do we know if that was protected under WP:ARBGG (which would still make it an arbitration enforcement action even with GG...
Click to read more »it did in fact function as a softer 1RR, was subsequently expanded under ARBGG, and WP:ECP2016, long before ARPIA3 more rigorously formalized its application...
Click to read more »standards, I blocked an admin during the mess that was GamerGate (cf. WP:ARBGG, think Arab-Israeli dispute but everyone involved is computer literate and...
Click to read more »courage has brought up a ton of paggies (WP:LOCALCON, WP:SYNC, WP:SS, WP:ARBGG etc)... but not given an explanation of what any of this stuff has to do...
Click to read more »