created an immediate need for additional arbitrators. Shortcut WP:ARBCONDWP:ARBCOND Arbitrators are expected to: Act with integrity and good faith at all times;...
Click to read more »harm. Paul August ☎ 19:42, 2 April 2021 (UTC) Largely per Iridescent. ARBCOND applies, sure, but there's no harm in specifying what type of conduct is...
Click to read more »of an administrator (WP:ADMINCOND, WP:ADMINACCT) and an arbitrator (WP:ARBCOND). Passed 11 to 0 at 03:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC) 7) The Arbitration Committee...
Click to read more »is beyond me. Either WP:ARBCOND means something or it does not. Either Gamaliel is removed from the committee or WP:ARBCOND is removed from ArbCom policy...
Click to read more »as both untruthful and vengeful, and is not the best reflection of WP:ARBCOND." "You may also want to remind your colleagues that ignoring ARCA entirely...
Click to read more »editors supposed to scrutinise your decision (per WP:ADMINACCT and WP:ARBCOND), if it is simultaneously treated as an "unofficial" channel that they...
Click to read more »authority. Not to mention each arb has access to OS/CU, and (notwithstanding ARBCOND) they can't/shouldn't really be the final community port of review of their...
Click to read more »by a case should require an arbitrator to recuse, in your opinion? WP:ARBCOND outlines the policy regarding recusals, and it is difficult to give more...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide_to_arbitration#Temporary_injunctions, WP:ARBCOND, and a few deadlines in WP:AC/P. Does that make my question clearer? --David...
Click to read more »accusation, as that is not the example of good faith as required by WP:ARBCOND, and comes off as rather ironic as we have only recently concluded another...
Click to read more »of an administrator (WP:ADMINCOND, WP:ADMINACCT) and an arbitrator (WP:ARBCOND). Support: I support in that there is enough material for me to indicate...
Click to read more »editors supposed to scrutinise your decision (per WP:ADMINACCT and WP:ARBCOND), if it is simultaneously treated as an "unofficial" channel that they...
Click to read more »think it is very unlikely an entire committee would go rogue and so WP:ARBCOND exists as a check and balance along with elections, interim elections,...
Click to read more »lives, do you think this is consistent with expectations described in WP:ARBCOND, and if not, do you have any suggestions in regards to this concern? Alex...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide_to_arbitration#Temporary_injunctions, WP:ARBCOND, and a few deadlines in WP:AC/P. Does that make my question clearer? --David...
Click to read more »lives, do you think this is consistent with expectations described in WP:ARBCOND, and if not, do you have any suggestions in regards to this concern? Alex...
Click to read more »think it is very unlikely an entire committee would go rogue and so WP:ARBCOND exists as a check and balance along with elections, interim elections,...
Click to read more »editors supposed to scrutinise your decision (per WP:ADMINACCT and WP:ARBCOND), if it is simultaneously treated as an "unofficial" channel that they...
Click to read more »ArbCom do about their arbitrator status? I see nothing at WP:ARBPOL, WP:ARBCOND, or WP:AC/P about what might happen in such a situation, hence why I'm...
Click to read more »answering that question in a satisfactory way may run afoul of point #4 of WP:ARBCOND. I'm not trying to avoid the question, but I want to make sure it's answered...
Click to read more »