This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
be declined and the PNAC and related articles be placed under DS per WP:ARBAPDS. The continued issues (if any) could then be dealt with swiftly by normal...
Click to read more »atyourservice (three month topic ban ARBAPDS), Netoholic (no action) and Anythingyouwant (indef topic ban ARBAPDS). (Discuss this story) IN THE MEDIA Breitbart...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS : Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »article is twice under the auspices of ArbCom DS (WP:NEWBLPBAN and WP:ARBAPDS) the next step is to take it to WP:AE which is a more appropriate venue...
Click to read more »for this thread to be closed before someone unintentionally breaches WP:ARBAPDS. 199.66.69.67 (talk) 20:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC) The original question...
Click to read more »Comments: The article is subject to 1RR discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBAPDS. Malerooster made three reverts. There is a notice at the top of the talk...
Click to read more »entitled to mark them as minor edits. User is already alerted under WP:ARBAPDS. EdJohnston (talk) 04:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC) Page List of black NHL...
Click to read more »article talk page: [32] Comments: I imagine the user also knew about the WP:ARBAPDS 1RR restriction, having edited the article 13 times since the editnotice...
Click to read more »17:45, 3 September 2017 (UTC) The page should probably be tagged for WP:ARBAPDS. --Izno (talk) 14:26, 3 September 2017 (UTC) I disagree with Samsara's...
Click to read more »Arbitration Committee as involving post-1932 American politics (see WP:ARBAPDS), as are edits that add or remove information from infoboxes - exactly...
Click to read more »disruption? EvergreenFir (talk) 20:19, 6 August 2018 (UTC) This looks like a WP:ARBAPDS. It takes two to tango, and while it appears that an attempt to discuss...
Click to read more »plain violation of the article editing restrictions authorized under WP:ARBAPDS. - MrX 🖋 14:20, 9 January 2020 (UTC) As per EvergreenFir, an AP2 0RR may...
Click to read more »than discuss. Note that page is subject to discretionary sanctions (WP:ARBAPDS). Reporting rather than handling it myself per WP:INVOLVED—I wrote much...
Click to read more »isn’t.TonyBallioni (talk) 21:10, 3 October 2018 (UTC) TonyBallioni, unlike ARBAPDS, the unblock statement is all American politics; what about abolishing...
Click to read more »Tulasi */ comment" Comments: Article is under 1RR and 24 hour wait per WP:ARBAPDS - MrX 🖋 12:52, 30 October 2019 (UTC) Result: User:Samp4ngeles is warned...
Click to read more »(UTC) Cassianto - this article is under a 1RR restriction under the WP:ARBAPDS case. LavaBaron (talk) 08:47, 17 August 2016 (UTC) Fair enough. But EEng...
Click to read more »"/* Mother Jones not RS? */ comment" Comments: The article is under WP:ARBAPDS 1RR. IP has violated it twice, ignoring the prominent edit notice. - MrX...
Click to read more »editing restrictions"? Dana Loesch is notable post-1932 political figure WP:ARBAPDS says "Limit of one revert in 24 hours." DrFleischman and ViriiK are both...
Click to read more »That's 6 editors. DrFleischman and ViriiK are both at 2RR at the article. ARBAPDS says "Limit of one revert in 24 hours." A quick glance at Snooganssnoogans'...
Click to read more »mentioned "Article is under active remedies per ARBAPDS." above. There's a standard active remedy for ARBAPDS which includes 1RR (see {{2016 US Election AE}})...
Click to read more »Callanecc. VM also alerted of WP:ARBAPDS sanctions by Kelly Mvbw alerted of EE sanctions by EdJohnston. Aware of WP:ARBAPDS sanctions here. Both users are...
Click to read more »be declined and the PNAC and related articles be placed under DS per WP:ARBAPDS. The continued issues (if any) could then be dealt with swiftly by normal...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »overall WP:ARBAP2's standards of conduct. It was done under authority of WP:ARBAPDS which allow administrators the ability to apply sanctions at their discretion...
Click to read more »editors: reinstatement of the edit challenged by reversion is clearly an WP:ARBAPDS violation) 22:11, 5 February 2017 MelanieN comments on the article talk...
Click to read more »duck, and they've made multiple potentially-controversial edits to WP:ARBAPDS articles. I don't suspect them of being a sock of any specific editor (though...
Click to read more »use (along with blocks) per my discretion in the topic area, as per WP:ARBAPDS. This sanction is merely more of a severe warning, with one additional...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS : Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »doesn't appear to include anything contentious. While I appreciate WP:ARBAPDS technically covers "all pages relating to American politics", in practice...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »- Tom | Thomas.W talk 00:00, 4 February 2018 (UTC) Well, I've dropped that standard ARBAPDS warning, but I suspect that given stuff like this it probably won't be...
Click to read more »alerts) Brought a complaint at WP:AE for WP:ARBAPDS on 8 September 2020: [69] Given a logged warning in WP:ARBAPDS subject area as a result of this WP:AE request...
Click to read more »discretionary sanctions authorized by active arbitration remedies (see WP:ARBAPDS). An administrator has applied the following restrictions to this article:...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS on the biography of Huma Abedin Diffs of edits that violate this sanction...
Click to read more »it. --BDD (talk) 15:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC) Wikipedia:ARBAPDSWikipedia:ARBAPDS → Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics (links · history ·...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS, "banned for one month from all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Enforcement : WP:ARBAPDS Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Enforcement : WP:ARBAPDS Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »latest personal attack. Far from being off the deep end, according to WP:ARBAPDS, the Wikipedia article on American Sniper, as well as any other articles...
Click to read more »replace the red text under “Sanction or remedy to be enforced” to link to WP:ARBAPDS. Mr Ernie (talk) 20:29, 7 August 2022 (UTC) A possible reason why NadVolum...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS : Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »allegations in BLPs. (WP:ARBGG, WP:ARBBLP) Diffs 4 & 5 also fall under WP:ARBAPDS. The evidence shows highlights of a larger pattern of manipulation and...
Click to read more »see WP:ARBAP2, discretionary sanctions for post-1932 US politics, per WP:ARBAPDS :) ——SerialNumber54129 10:43, 5 December 2018 (UTC) Thanks. – Athaenara...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS Diffs before being aware of APDS 21 March 2018 – Asking for content about...
Click to read more »discretionary sanctions authorized by active arbitration remedies (see WP:ARBAPDS). An administrator has applied the following restrictions to this article"...
Click to read more »lifted it. I've left a note on their talk page, and I also left the WP:ARBAPDS sanctions alert for good measure. TonyBallioni's note suggests the user...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS : Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS, specifically Discretionary sanctions guidelines involving decorum and...
Click to read more »(UTC) That conduct is unnecessarily hostile. The article is subject to WP:ARBAPDS discretionary sanctions and Niteshift36 has been previously alerted. I...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS : Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »conflict) Softlavender, that just isn't true; the ruling in question (WP:ARBAPDS) explicitly says "all pages", not "all articles", so if one accepts that...
Click to read more »ECP there was declined). This whole area is likely to be worse than WP:ARBAPDS normally is for the next week, admins be warned: "Abandon all hope ye who...
Click to read more »"standard" topic bans in this area or to modify the 1932 cutoff for WP:ARBAPDS; other World War II-era figures such as Hitler are fine without discretionary...
Click to read more »personal attacks, and documented history of previous sanctions under WP:ARBAPDS, the more insidious issue is Thucydides411's polite but persistent horse...
Click to read more »Humanengr (talk) 13:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC) Since that page is under WP:ARBAPDS restrictions, namely, Consensus required: All editors must obtain consensus...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS "Wikipedia editors are expected to behave reasonably, calmly, and courteously...
Click to read more »23 December 2016 (UTC) US politics after 1932 and DS applies. See WP:ARBAPDS NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC) Please note that...
Click to read more »doubt, I based my warning on WP:AC/DS #guide.expect, as authorised by WP:ARBAPDS and arguably WP:NEWBLPBAN. Of course, the standard WP:BLP would certainly...
Click to read more »deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) under WP:ARBAPDS, or other appropriate admin action to prevent further disruption and WP:BLP...
Click to read more »genuinely uninvolved admin examine whether discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBAPDS should be applied. While the initial Signpost article may be thought to...
Click to read more »This kind of attack against a living person who is under the scope of ARBAPDS cannot be tolerated. Please delete the revision. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) ...
Click to read more »controversial topic; Some of the contributions fall directly under WP:ARBAPDS. Not an easy topic area to be editing. Mr rnddude (talk) 16:53, 16 April...
Click to read more »WP:AC/DS#sanctions.page. All of these post-1992 US politics articles are still under WP:ARBAPDS. What we are talking about here is the specific enforcement option to apply...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS : Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »parts of his work that are non-controversial. However, in the spirit of WP:ARBAPDS and {{2016 US Election AE}}, any edits that are contested by other editors...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS#Behavioral standards: 5) Wikipedia editors are expected to behave reasonably...
Click to read more »possible to bring Kirsten Gillibrand under the auspices of WP:ACDS (per WP:ARBAPDS), please? The article appears to be gaining prominence because of the subject's...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:1RR, WP:ARBAPDS Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »enforced Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/CASENAME#SECTION : Wikipedia:ARBAPDS Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »for talk page posts. TimothyJosephWood 00:16, 7 September 2016 (UTC) WP:ARBAPDS remedies are intended to address behavioral issues like edit warring, personal...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS; logged AE warning: "not to use administrative boards to further disputes...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS : Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS : Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »area using an ARCA request. Second, when I read the WP:ARBAP2 page or WP:ARBAPDS, it does not mention any such provision. Is the talk page template out...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS/WP:1RR: Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »TheTimesAreAChanging is indefinitely topic-banned from the WP:ARBAPDS topic area (post-1932 U.S. politics and closely related people), and may appeal...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Enforcement :WP:ARBAP2, WP:ARBAPDS Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS : Post-1932 American politics Diffs of edits that violate this sanction...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS / WP:1RR / Template:Editnotices/Page/Donald Trump Diffs of edits that violate...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS, {{American politics AE}} Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or...
Click to read more »presented here, what have most of the diffs presented here got to do with WP:ARBAPDS? Genuine question, I don't see how you can present a DS as the reason for...
Click to read more »block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAP2, WP:ARBAPDS Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS : Wikipedia editors are expected to behave reasonably, calmly, and courteously...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS on articles related to Hillary Clinton Diffs of edits that violate this...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »war [33] [34] [35]. More troubling, is that he has learned how to use WP:ARBAPDS as an implement to veto content that doesn't mesh with his point of view...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS, specifically Discretionary sanctions guidelines involving decorum and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Enforcement : WP:ARBAPDS Topic banned from "all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932...
Click to read more »block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:NEWBLPBAN WP:ARBAPDS Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »filter log · block user · block log) Sanction or remedy to be enforced WP:ARBAPDS Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation...
Click to read more »(initiator) Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request Regarding WP:ARBAPDS on Talk:Donald Trump it says Consensus required: All editors must obtain...
Click to read more »(ev / t) (w / t) (pd / t) Clauses to which an amendment is requested WP:ARBAPDS List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:AC/DS but, again :the case doesn't say that, or link there from Wikipedia:ARBAPDS. And the page doesn't have a section that defines what standard discretionary...
Click to read more »6 February 2018 (UTC) Brittany Pettibone is placed under WP:ECP per WP:ARBAPDS. This is a controversial BLP article that is frequented by new editors...
Click to read more »(ev / t) (w / t) (pd / t) Clauses to which an amendment is requested WP:ARBAPDS Link to the principle, finding, remedy, section, etc for which you are...
Click to read more »got sucked into Trumpian edit-wars and eventually got banned under WP:ARBAPDS. They appeal their ban, and the admin Bar agrees to unblock subject to...
Click to read more »(initiator) Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request Does the WP:ARBAPDS DS covering "post-1932 politics of the US" cover only narrowly "politics"...
Click to read more »controversial/hot areas a number of which are under DS (ARBPIA, BLPs, ARBAPDS) and have been able to engage with editors of all persuasions without significant...
Click to read more »temporary, to assist an RfC on a BLP matter. DS/1RR restrictions? WP:ARBAPDS, look at FA Hillary Clinton. It's rather disingenuous for editors to suggest...
Click to read more »want to be aware of special rules for American politics articles, see WP:ARBAPDS. 331dot (talk) 19:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC) Good afternoon, I have a couple...
Click to read more »editors of having a political motive behind their opinions. I feel that WP:ARBAPDS would apply here. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »that it was loosely connected to a situation at ANI that related to WP:ARBAPDS / WP:CIVIL. The two major issues we hear about the most at ARCA relate...
Click to read more »editors of having a political motive behind their opinions. I feel that WP:ARBAPDS would apply here. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »(talk) 18:37, 21 December 2021 (UTC) Semi-protected indefinitely. Per WP:ARBAPDS. clpo13(talk) 19:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC) Jack Ninte (record producer) (edit...
Click to read more »so I'd like to try pending changes. This article is already under an WP:ARBAPDS sanction. ― Tartan357 Talk 08:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC) Pending-changes...
Click to read more »nature of the topic, this article could have been put under a 1RR per WP:ARBAPDS with all that machinery but so far no admin has found it necessary. EdJohnston...
Click to read more »first "winner" mentioned has had his BLP ECPed above by Coffee, under WP:ARBAPDS. Perhaps we should at least place notices that Fake News Awards is under...
Click to read more »warring – At least two breaches of the 1RR restriction in place per WP:ARBAPDS, despite talk page discussion. clpo13(talk) 23:48, 25 August 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »that it was loosely connected to a situation at ANI that related to WP:ARBAPDS / WP:CIVIL. The two major issues we hear about the most at ARCA relate...
Click to read more »in effect. I was doing some cleanup, but the article was put under WP:ARBAPDS a week ago (though I can't find anything in WP:DSLOG) and now I can't do...
Click to read more »temporary, to assist an RfC on a BLP matter. DS/1RR restrictions? WP:ARBAPDS, look at FA Hillary Clinton. It's rather disingenuous for editors to suggest...
Click to read more »20220103182853 20240103182853 [[WP:AE|Arbitration enforcement]]: [[WP:ARBAPDS]] 247 Chowdhury HJ Mitchell 20220103203129 20250103203129 Persistent...
Click to read more »(talk) 01:20, 20 January 2017 (UTC) (edit conflict) Sanctions are from WP:ARBAPDS. Twitbookspacetube (talk) 01:22, 20 January 2017 (UTC) Resolved --JustBerry...
Click to read more »