This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
themselves reflect negative assumptions about others. Shortcut WP:AOBFWP:AOBF Avoid accusing other editors of bad faith without clear evidence in the form...
Click to read more »closed yet Unscintillating (talk) 17:20, 23 June 2012 (UTC) Please Do not WP:AOBF the nominator. All the AFDs were valid at the time of nomination, They were...
Click to read more »February 2013 (UTC) Comment Hey Wolfowitz, please assume good faith! WP:AOBF IronKnuckle (talk) 04:45, 15 February 2013 (UTC) Keep Notable as a gun control...
Click to read more »RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 07:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) WP:AOBF. Let'srun (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »resolution, inaccurate colors) and does not deserve to be featured. Also WP:AOBF.--Craigboy (talk) 11:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC) It's not an exact duplicate; you...
Click to read more »February 2013 (UTC) Comment Hey Wolfowitz, please assume good faith! WP:AOBF How about you give a policy based reason to Keep(if you can find one, I cant...
Click to read more »it as you see it because maybe you do not see it clearly please read WP:AOBF. When i nominated the article there were no references whatsoever and just...
Click to read more »very first edit by this editor. Drmies (talk) 02:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC) WP:AOBF. Coal-fired power station (talk) 08:54, 7 July 2009 (UTC) Still, interesting...
Click to read more »reply on Marshall's talk page[2] to stick to the content and stop doing WP:AOBF. From what i See this is clear case of Lying by SMarshall opposite to WP:AGF--DBigXray...
Click to read more »destroy it. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:45, 28 December 2009 (UTC) Comment - See WP:AOBF, please desist from such accusations in future. Here is for discussing the...
Click to read more »people here not only fail to WP:HEAR but also don't mind indulging in blatant WP:AOBFs against community consensus.--DBigXray 10:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »appreciate this clear breach of WP:AOBF". I NEVER made any such claim. To say I did is a clear breach of WP:AOBF. If insider had his way, all controversy...
Click to read more »nominator-specific with the point of voting right at the end. Perhaps WP:AOBF is more direct? – The Grid (talk) 18:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »4 July 2015 (UTC) Human3015, that is pure accusation of bad faith / WP:AOBF, that too not based on action rather inaction of mine towards another sock...
Click to read more »Edison (talk) 18:36, 7 June 2012 (UTC) You missed the whole point of WP:AOBF. Don't think such is common, when some one adds a ref, you've to assume they've...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arguments_to_avoid_in_deletion_discussions#Arguments_to_the_person and WP:AOBF. I am not going to reply to your rant above for fear of derailing the discussion...
Click to read more »name change. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 15:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC) sed contra WP:AOBF--Jahaza (talk) 15:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC) Your bad faith is well substantiated...
Click to read more »Once their initial WP:AOBF was addressed, they either should have provided the evidence (sources) asked for, or stopped WP:AOBF. They did neither. —SridYO...
Click to read more »(talk) 07:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC) I shouldn't have to remind you of WP:AOBF. YM has been asked about this before, and failed to deal with the issue....
Click to read more »May 2020 (UTC) It is inflammatory to accuse an editor of bad faith. See WP:AOBF. I request you strike that comment and amend it to something civil before...
Click to read more »what needed work here and we are still trying to fix. Also please seeWP:AOBF and lets look at things on a case by case basis and if there are differences...
Click to read more »and of acting in bad faith – the appropriate guidelines were provided (WP:AOBF and WP:NPA), but User:Dervenagas continued to make accusations – User:Dervenagas...
Click to read more »editors have accused me of acting in of bad faith. Wiki policy states at WP:AOBF "Making accusations of bad faith can be inflammatory and hence these accusations...
Click to read more »to administrators for your disruptive attitude since you're trying to WP:AOBF me now." April 2019 "Clearly, you're a confused user." "As I told you before...
Click to read more »editwar whether you are discussing on talk or not. You should really read WP:AOBF. None of the diffs I gave were reverts to a sock I think. DBigXray has further...
Click to read more »then following up with evidence for it, is not personal attacks. See WP:AOBF I am still not wrong about you being a sock to Alaskalava and have provided...
Click to read more »proof. Please avoid bad faith claims. This is against Wikipedia policy WP:AOBF. I have been adding references for each and every statement that I add. As...
Click to read more »into trouble to support your case the way you should do according to WP:AOBF,-as I tried to do-, but you assumed bad faith from the beginning, and this...
Click to read more »toward improving an article...."), WP:Assume good faith (particularly WP:AOBF: "accusing other editors of bad faith without clear evidence in the form...
Click to read more »not be enough for sanctions, but I should be enough for a discussion. WP:AOBF "Without clear evidence that the action of another editor is actually in...
Click to read more »(talk) 14:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC) As referred from WP:Wikiquette_alerts#WP:AOBF_issue_with_IP_address_94.193.135.142. Rapido (talk) 18:18, 22 January 2010...
Click to read more »WP:DISRUPT, WP:HARASS, WP:UNDUE, WP:NPOV, WP:UNSOURCED, WP:CHALLENGE, WP:AOBF, WP:DISCUSSCONSENSUS, WP:NOTCSD, WP:PRESERVE. PLUS ULTRA CARLOS appears keep...
Click to read more »upset about that WP:PA, and instead am going to encourage you to read WP:AOBF. I've also responded to your second post to my talk page, but I (edit conflict)ed...
Click to read more »repeatedly alleging bad faith motives could be construed as a personal attack. WP:AOBF. These are basic stuff, didnt think I had to explain how that count as personal...
Click to read more »author Geo Swan had asked from CSD G7[50] started deletion review with WP:AOBF towards Bushranger for closing the discussion and deleting the article. After...
Click to read more »dangerously close to finding yourself the subject of a BOOMERANG thread, per WP:AOBF. You're also far too experienced an editor to think you can get anyone banned...
Click to read more »(UTC) I hope the admins will take a note of such propaganda editing, WP:AOBF and block-shopping by Mar4d --DBigXray 09:50, 2 August 2012 (UTC) You seem...
Click to read more »WP:AOBF. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC) The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. This is a bogus...
Click to read more »fear their influence will wane if this article is deleted. *eyeroll* See WP:AOBF. My reason for proposing an early close—which is to say, urging User:Nstock...
Click to read more »possible with references to reliable sources. See WP:RS. Also see WP:AGF and WP:AOBF. Corinne (talk) 03:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ashoka...
Click to read more »Suddenly after it, he came on my talk page and attacked me for bad faith by WP:AOBF and without any differences. He even called me that I am kneejerk reverting...
Click to read more »false accusations either an accusation of bad faith without evidence (WP:AOBF), or an attempt to Wp:SANCTIONGAME by mischaracterizing my actions; neither...
Click to read more »see as consistent before that good faith is assumed. If you're going to WP:AOBF, you need to show diffs that indicate *clear* evidence of bad faith. Nor...
Click to read more »discuss edits at all. Repeatedly calling other editors biased? That's not a WP:AOBF violation? Bacondrum (talk) 22:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC) Bacondrum, Most editors...
Click to read more »'having some kind of relations to the editors that I pinged' which is WP:AOBF and ad hominem and basically claiming, when they pinged some users for the...
Click to read more »wikihounded and I don't believe I should have to put up with it. From WP:AOBF, "repeatedly alleging bad faith motives could be construed as a personal...
Click to read more »actions and my honest motivations, warts and all. I'm tempted to cite WP:AOBF, but generally arguments of this nature aren't a good idea and defeat the...
Click to read more »Suddenly after it, he came on my talk page and attacked me for bad faith by WP:AOBF and without any differences. He even called me that I am kneejerk reverting...
Click to read more »non-action at another AE thread for you is not proof that Arcane, and again is an AoBF Reply to Further Bad faith Comments by DreamGuy: Your whole block of comments...
Click to read more »his block etc) but also towards another editor (WP:ASPERSIONS, WP:NPA, WP:AOBF). And oh please, spare me those nice words and tips. The fact that you're...
Click to read more »19 February 2025 (UTC) @The Bushranger: But that kind of thought is an WP:AOBF assumption, anything can happen, even to those that disagree with the message...
Click to read more »Grrahnbahr (talk) 21:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC) @Grrahnbahr, excuse me, but your WP:AOBF interpretation of my comment above demonstrates your ignorance of the subject...
Click to read more »nothing about bad faith there. If it's to be retargeted, it should be to WP:AOBF. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:20, 10 September 2019 (UTC) I disagree, that...
Click to read more »nominations. Unscintillating (talk) 00:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC) Please Do not WP:AOBF the nominator. All the AFDs were valid at the time of nomination, it was...
Click to read more »the trick. Qworty (talk) 22:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC) You might reread WP:AOBF:). I will assume good faith and give you a half-dozen, since you requested...
Click to read more »it as you see it because maybe you do not see it clearly please read WP:AOBF. When i nominated the article there were no references whatsoever and just...
Click to read more »bias shows a certain degree of predetermination as well. According to WP:AOBF, making unsupported accusations of bad faith can be seen as a personal attack...
Click to read more »February 2013 (UTC) Comment Hey Wolfowitz, please assume good faith! WP:AOBF IronKnuckle (talk) 04:45, 15 February 2013 (UTC) Keep Notable as a gun control...
Click to read more »closed yet Unscintillating (talk) 17:20, 23 June 2012 (UTC) Please Do not WP:AOBF the nominator. All the AFDs were valid at the time of nomination, They were...
Click to read more »May 2020 (UTC) It is inflammatory to accuse an editor of bad faith. See WP:AOBF. I request you strike that comment and amend it to something civil before...
Click to read more »very first edit by this editor. Drmies (talk) 02:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC) WP:AOBF. Coal-fired power station (talk) 08:54, 7 July 2009 (UTC) Still, interesting...
Click to read more »destroy it. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:45, 28 December 2009 (UTC) Comment - See WP:AOBF, please desist from such accusations in future. Here is for discussing the...
Click to read more »user, therefore, are not constructive. The continued claims of hoax and WP:AOBF are unhelpful and unneccessary. WP:AGF, WP:BITE--France2007 (talk) 02:18...
Click to read more »across this article, then? BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC) WP:AOBF. I also wasn't referring to that vote. Let'srun (talk) 21:02, 12 May 2024...
Click to read more »the trick. Qworty (talk) 22:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC) You might reread WP:AOBF:). I will assume good faith and give you a half-dozen, since you requested...
Click to read more »fear their influence will wane if this article is deleted. *eyeroll* See WP:AOBF. My reason for proposing an early close—which is to say, urging User:Nstock...
Click to read more »author Geo Swan had asked from CSD G7[2] started deletion review with WP:AOBF towards Bushranger for closing the discussion and deleting the article. After...
Click to read more »where I'm not following WP:AGF. I'm happy to provide more evidence per WP:AOBF regarding Ludwigs2. --Ronz (talk) 02:28, 27 October 2010 (UTC) Support. I...
Click to read more »nominator-specific with the point of voting right at the end. Perhaps WP:AOBF is more direct? – The Grid (talk) 18:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »bias shows a certain degree of predetermination as well. According to WP:AOBF, making unsupported accusations of bad faith can be seen as a personal attack...
Click to read more »way to read the above comment that is consistent with WP:GOODFAITH and WP:AOBF and not having much luck. Holzman-Tweed (talk) 19:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »resolution, inaccurate colors) and does not deserve to be featured. Also WP:AOBF.--Craigboy (talk) 11:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC) It's not an exact duplicate; you...
Click to read more »the break down of cooperative editing at this article. Note that per WP:AOBF "repeatedly alleging bad faith motives could be construed as a personal attack...
Click to read more »name change. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 15:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC) sed contra WP:AOBF--Jahaza (talk) 15:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC) Your bad faith is well substantiated...
Click to read more »user, therefore, are not constructive. The continued claims of hoax and WP:AOBF are unhelpful and unneccessary. WP:AGF, WP:BITE--France2007 (talk) 02:18...
Click to read more »Joefromrandb (talk) 21:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC) Please read WP:AGF (particularly WP:AOBF), you seem to have a critical misunderstanding of what "bad faith" means...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arguments_to_avoid_in_deletion_discussions#Arguments_to_the_person and WP:AOBF. I am not going to reply to your rant above for fear of derailing the discussion...
Click to read more »February 2013 (UTC) Comment Hey Wolfowitz, please assume good faith! WP:AOBF How about you give a policy based reason to Keep(if you can find one, I cant...
Click to read more »- this is despite a recent previous request for them not to WP:AOBF. Regarding User:Foetusized, edit summary: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index...
Click to read more »reply on Marshall's talk page[3] to stick to the content and stop doing WP:AOBF. From what i See this is clear case of Lying by SMarshall opposite to WP:AGF--DBigXray...
Click to read more »is hardly recent. —teb728 t c 00:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC) And please see WP:AOBF. —teb728 t c 06:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC) Also note that search engine optimization...
Click to read more »Joefromrandb (talk) 21:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC) Please read WP:AGF (particularly WP:AOBF), you seem to have a critical misunderstanding of what "bad faith" means...
Click to read more »can say the same about people having I capitalized. again, bad faith. WP:AOBF ″It can be seen as a personal attack if bad faith motives are alleged without...
Click to read more »responding to him this way. You should NOT jump to accusations of bad faith WP:AOBF. The user is simply upset and unfamiliar with Wikipedia policies. While long-time...
Click to read more »attack. Comment by Arbitrators: Comment by parties: Comment by others: WP:AOBF. 173.228.123.193 (talk) 04:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC) 3) TBD Comment by Arbitrators:...
Click to read more »Edison (talk) 18:36, 7 June 2012 (UTC) You missed the whole point of WP:AOBF. Don't think such is common, when some one adds a ref, you've to assume they've...
Click to read more »perceived as a fan of Donald Trump by any stretch of the imagination. Per WP:AOBF "Avoid accusing other editors of bad faith without clear evidence in the...
Click to read more »good faith. Pilaz (talk) 17:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC) Please note that WP:AOBF, as multiple editors have expressed was done by the appellant here, is also...
Click to read more »nominations. Unscintillating (talk) 00:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC) Please Do not WP:AOBF the nominator. All the AFDs were valid at the time of nomination, it was...
Click to read more »little strained to suggest Julian is manufacturing the work queues. The AoBF required to label as 'rude' his light hearted reference to a then current...
Click to read more »way to read the above comment that is consistent with WP:GOODFAITH and WP:AOBF and not having much luck. Holzman-Tweed (talk) 19:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Resolved – I would like to thank all those involved for taking such a mature attitude to this matter, particularly Queen, for being prepared to withdraw...
Click to read more »relevant to sock puppetry." Moksha88 (talk) 07:39, 6 October 2019 (UTC) Read WP:AOBF before accusing without proper evidence and directly calling someone as bad...
Click to read more »perceived as a fan of Donald Trump by any stretch of the imagination. Per WP:AOBF "Avoid accusing other editors of bad faith without clear evidence in the...
Click to read more »noidexing the stub and hiding any collected content. In light of this WP:AOBF-driven posting by Justlettersandnumbers, I will be pursuing mediation. Rgds...
Click to read more »good faith. Pilaz (talk) 17:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC) Please note that WP:AOBF, as multiple editors have expressed was done by the appellant here, is also...
Click to read more »aware that I have all right to blank my own page, and I chose to do so after AOBF and personal attacks from various parties. I would also be interested to...
Click to read more »shut people down and toss personal attacks at editors. In violation of WP:AOBF. You and Kzl55 view Wikipedia as a lanching pad for you own nationalistic...
Click to read more »when it can likely never be substantiated, it's just not helpful. see WP:AOBF. --neon white talk 05:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC) As this seems to be a long...
Click to read more »interventions were due to Andy Dingley's attacks on myself. A clear case of WP:AOBF. If someone were to look at edit histories, they would see Andy Dingley's...
Click to read more »not the form. Rd232 talk 02:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Relevant policy: WP:AOBF: "It can be seen as a personal attack if bad faith motives are alleged without...
Click to read more »what needed work here and we are still trying to fix. Also please seeWP:AOBF and lets look at things on a case by case basis and if there are differences...
Click to read more »1 September 2019 (UTC) Can you show I am acting in bad faith as per WP:AOBF? And for the record I have no user account but have edited Wikipedia previously...
Click to read more »here not only fail to WP:HEAR but also don't mind indulging in blatant WP:AOBFs against community consensus.--DBigXray 10:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC) Article...
Click to read more »not mean to be condescending. Grayfell (talk) 02:31, 21 July 2025 (UTC) WP:AOBF Czarking0 (talk) 02:36, 21 July 2025 (UTC) I honestly don't know what that...
Click to read more »against Wikipedia:Assume good faith, and I would point you to look at WP:AOBF by [posting] on their talk page Your edits on the page of Ry Armstrong indicate...
Click to read more »RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 07:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) WP:AOBF. Let'srun (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »accept... but to presume it was done in bad faith calls for support per WP:AOBF.--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC) agreed Buffs (talk)...
Click to read more »against other editors without evidence in the form of diffs, see e.g. WP:AOBF. I'm specifically referring to this part of your comment I believe that im...
Click to read more »across this article, then? BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC) WP:AOBF. I also wasn't referring to that vote. Let'srun (talk) 21:02, 12 May 2024...
Click to read more »...
Click to read more »to be civil? Brusquedandelion (talk) 07:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC) See WP:AOBF and WP:AAGF; accusing other editors of incivility or bad faith without clear...
Click to read more »attacked me twice during an RFC on a contentious topic, violating Wikipedia:AOBF in doing so, linked to those attacks here where plenty of Admins can see...
Click to read more »guys; work is not free. This accusation is WP:UNCIVIL, WP:ASPERSIONS, WP:AOBF. And this is not me what I am accusing, with my colleague editor AstrooKai...
Click to read more »interpreting my attempt of clarification as manipulation shows that you are WP:AOBF. Cukrakalnis (talk) 15:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC) @Cukrakalnis No really,...
Click to read more »distinct definitions and cannot be randomly mix-and-matched to win/punish. WP:AOBF's important here: Without clear evidence that the action of another editor...
Click to read more »