Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
standards that the community has decided, and not otherwise. Shortcuts WP:ANOT#TROPHYWP:ANOT#TROPHY WP:TROPHYWP:TROPHY Being an administrator does not place you...
Click to read more »send to cleanup or Attention; otherwise delete. If it's a real gate but anot a real battle, there could probably stand to be an architectural article...
Click to read more »like the subject here seems to be doing. Futher reading: WP:TROPHY, and WP:ANOT#ENTITLEMENT. —usernamekiran (talk) 17:15, 25 January 2020 (UTC) ? Neither...
Click to read more »adminship too hard as it will easily lead to oppositions with reference to WP:ANOT. The rule of AWB states that should not "edit too fast; consider opening...
Click to read more »& WP:LASTING. DgwTalk 01:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC) Delete Trivial event. ANOT NEWS is the best reason. DGG ( talk ) 01:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC) Weak Keep...
Click to read more »adminship." will immediately result in oppose votes by users on your RFA per WP:ANOT (which you attempted 10 days ago). I think that is your only problem right...
Click to read more »that it might not give a diploma is irrelevan, and that the people may anot actually go to college is irrelevant. 10th grade is the usual high school...
Click to read more »WP:ANOT. Please also be aware that one does not require administrative privileges to revert. Avriette 00:49, 31 January 2006 (UTC) For the record, ANOT is...
Click to read more »administrators, to help with that stuff? Or, is it a trophy, even if WP:ANOT says otherwise? Bushcarrot (Talk·Guestbook) 01:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC) Banning...
Click to read more »that those questions have been thoroughly addressed and those that were anot verifiable-deleted. I would ask that this person's information remains in...
Click to read more »activities mentioned do not require administrative rights. Please see WP:ANOT. Avriette 01:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC) Oppose. Per Talk:e (mathematical...
Click to read more »(such as difficult moves and the like), I'll happily support. See also WP:ANOT. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Avriette (talk • contribs)...
Click to read more »are and images are very very different....containing the same logo does anot affect that. North8000 (talk) 17:24, 14 February 2018 (UTC) The ensign is...
Click to read more »know the language Z and never heard words XXX and YYY before. Your actions? ANot being familiar with the words in question, I would place a notice on Administrators'...
Click to read more »fact: the other day, he accused Raul of Admin Abuse, stating "lessee... WP:ANOT: "[When you are an administrator you don't just block and unblock who you...
Click to read more »detailed research being conducted to determine correct version to revert to. ANot reverts. --Robdurbar 12:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC) Three-revert rule violation...
Click to read more »March 2006 (UTC) oppose. adminship is not a prize for being a good user. WP:ANOT. ... aa:talk 20:59, 7 March 2006 (UTC) Oppose, SlimVirgin's comments and...
Click to read more »be problematic.)DGG (talk) 14:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC) Support to quote WP:ANOT They do not need to know how "everything works". They need to know enough...
Click to read more »see below) --Deathphoenix 16:04, 25 January 2006 (UTC) I think we need WP:ANOT (what adminship is not). It is not an honor. It is not a reward for a job...
Click to read more »--Richmeistertalk 07:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC) Longevity in wikipedia is anot a criteria for inclusion. "Notable for many reasons" is not a valid criteria...
Click to read more »relevant title. --A.Garnet 10:58, 22 October 2006 (UTC) Comment: per WP:ANOT: an admin is just a normal user with a mop and a bucket, not an expert or...
Click to read more »getting promoted solely due to WP:ITIS. All of this is making me doubt WP:ANOT#Adminship_is_not_an_entitlement. Based on the number of supports, I can only...
Click to read more »that those questions have been thoroughly addressed and those that were anot verifiable-deleted. I would ask that this person's information remains in...
Click to read more »methodology if flawed. For one thing, having articles in many Wikipedias is anot a reliable indicator that someone is a "top scientist", which is why I mentioned...
Click to read more »that it might not give a diploma is irrelevan, and that the people may anot actually go to college is irrelevant. 10th grade is the usual high school...
Click to read more »& WP:LASTING. DgwTalk 01:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC) Delete Trivial event. ANOT NEWS is the best reason. DGG ( talk ) 01:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC) Weak Keep...
Click to read more »like the subject here seems to be doing. Futher reading: WP:TROPHY, and WP:ANOT#ENTITLEMENT. —usernamekiran (talk) 17:15, 25 January 2020 (UTC) ? Neither...
Click to read more »manageable than AmLibs. More particularly, I think we'll find that having one anot the other will draw the sort of arguments we're seeing here--accusations...
Click to read more »necessary to aid Wikipedia," something found among other relevant points at WP:ANOT. Finally, the candidate's statements of regaining interest after "all the...
Click to read more »are valuable yet don't "have the proper temperament to be admins" (see WP:ANOT#ENTITLEMENT) OhanaUnitedTalk page 06:15, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Support, though...
Click to read more »methodology if flawed. For one thing, having articles in many Wikipedias is anot a reliable indicator that someone is a "top scientist", which is why I mentioned...
Click to read more »support the permanent semi-protection of all BLPs? If so, why, if not, why? ANot really. I think most bits of BLP vandalism get reverted bloody quickly anyway...
Click to read more »below, where focuses on the contributor and not the content: please see WP:ANOT and links re: administrator abuse. The idea is to provide the most accurate...
Click to read more »Nutiketaiel (talk) 20:28, 10 March 2010 (UTC) LOL and support. Good one for WP:ANOT. Kayau Voting IS evil 09:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC) Strong Support - MMS2013...
Click to read more »soon, at Lebron James' request. Apparently, Lebron can't handle the idea of anot...') 06:13, 3 Nov 2003 Minesweeper deleted "George bush" (content was: 'George...
Click to read more »relevant title. --A.Garnet 10:58, 22 October 2006 (UTC) Comment: per WP:ANOT: an admin is just a normal user with a mop and a bucket, not an expert or...
Click to read more »example. But please read the policy on WP:EL and remember that wikipedia is anot an external linkfarm. GeorgeMoney (talk) 19:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC) I put...
Click to read more »--Richmeistertalk 07:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC) Longevity in wikipedia is anot a criteria for inclusion. "Notable for many reasons" is not a valid criteria...
Click to read more »they would to any other user – if not more so: Adminship is not a game WP:ANOT#GAME and I state this with the full knowledge that all administrators make...
Click to read more »MapleStory. Though it is unknown whether the letter was foolproof issued by Nexon anot, official OdinMs developers had decided not to risk their financial futures...
Click to read more »says we give admin closures more weight. Indeed, per WP:NOBIGDEAL and WP:ANOT, being an admin doesn't give anyone special authority over content decisions...
Click to read more »that unique Japanese could also have Cyrillic version but I do not know anot nothing about the usage. Hungarian alphabet is not so unique, it use Latin...
Click to read more »