WP:ALLORNOTHINGWP:ALLORNOTHING WP:AONWP:AON Examples: Keep If you delete this you will have to delete everything in Category:Wikipedia articles about X. AllOrNothing (talk)...

motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Note - WP:ALLORNOTHING is actually an argument against bundling...

notability guideline provided. See also WP:ALLORNOTHING. Hmlarson (talk) 17:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING do not apply here, now I know that you...

(which have yet to be demonstrated) or "importance". I don't like the WP:ALLORNOTHING claims that I have seen in other related AfDs and the removal of prods...

5 March 2017 (UTC) Again with the WP:ALLORNOTHING. I read WP:ALLORNOTHING and I understand [[WP:ALLORNOTHING, I just don't agree with it. It's an essay...

opinion. However, I would like to say that here is a situation where WP:ALLORNOTHING might come up. So remember not to use that line. --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδιτоr...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a reason for keeping an article, and the keep argument fails to...

government sites). To the IP who posted above: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:ALLORNOTHING are not valid arguments for either keeping or deleting. B.Wind (talk)...

WKRN, and on CNN. Also, deleters argument seems to be falling into WP:ALLORNOTHING. - Smashville 16:42, 1 September 2007 (UTC) Keep or merge and redirect...

Scotland. As for the previous AfD on consulates in different cities, see WP:ALLORNOTHING. --Oakshade (talk) 16:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC) Can you demonstrate...

with WP:JNN, and due to the motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

gotta keep.Deltopia 04:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC) WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS and WP:ALLORNOTHING are relevant here. -- Kesh 04:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC) These are references...

by Randybenn (talk • contribs) So you're arguing WP:OSE, WP:LOSE, WP:ALLORNOTHING. Nice. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One...

176 (talk • contribs) 21:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Have a look at WP:ALLORNOTHING. PhilKnight (talk) 23:06, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Keep Genuine reference...

(talk) 20:42, 6 May 2021 (UTC) So now you're shifted to pushing a WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. The existence of the other articles are irrelevant. We are...

with WP:JNN, and due to the motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

--Agamemnon2 (talk) 19:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Please note Wikipedia:ALLORNOTHING. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 19:29...

with WP:JNN, and due to the motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

Vegaswikian 07:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC) Perhaps you should have a look at WP:ALLORNOTHING, WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, WP:EPISODES, and CSD A1 first. --Calton | Talk 01:42...

purposeful disruption to make a point. DarkAudit 12:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING seems to be what applies here. Morgan Wick 18:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Delete...

with WP:JNN, and due to the motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

Currently the nom is running into issues with WP:JNN, WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING due to the motivations for deletion. HatlessAtless (talk) 17:41, 10 July...

Protonk (talk) 23:37, 22 April 2008 (UTC) Avala, may I direct you to WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:POINT? I've removed your mega-block of text. Be careful, that...

with WP:JNN, and due to the motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:15, 3 March 2008 (UTC) Keep. At the risk of WP:ALLORNOTHING, just about all the suburbs of Melbourne, where I live, have their own...

argument that other pages need to be deleted doesn't help this one; see WP:ALLORNOTHING. §everal⇒|Times 16:41, 14 October 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

with WP:JNN, and due to the motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

Smartyllama (talk) 12:28, 6 July 2017 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ALLORNOTHING. I strongly contest that every country in the world's records are notable...

November 2007 (UTC) You remembered WP:WAX, but you may have forgotten WP:ALLORNOTHING. We don't have to deal with all of the problem articles at once. One...

and not of the nominator? Ajf773 (talk) 08:37, 4 May 2021 (UTC) see WP:ALLORNOTHING--Rusf10 (talk) 22:32, 5 May 2021 (UTC) Delete As per WP:NOTTRAVEL. Usefulness...

with WP:JNN, and due to the motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Comment: This one isn't...

there are! GiantSnowman (talk) 11:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Comment: WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a useful argument. Stifle (talk) 15:24, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Comment...

one should not be deleted but rather that the others should be (cf. WP:ALLORNOTHING). --Flex (talk|contribs) 03:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC) Delete though perhaps...

any different? Titan50 (talk) 19:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Please see WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:OTHERSTUFF. Wisdom89 (T / C) 20:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Redirect...

(Emperor (talk) 15:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC)) Also worth bearing in mind: WP:ALLORNOTHING--Mike Cline (talk) 17:39, 8 March 2010 (UTC) Keep useful list of characters...

which features two members of Eve 6?. Look, Wikipedia isn't a game of WP:ALLORNOTHING, the fact is your band simply doesn't meet WP:MUSIC, "it's only a matter...

son's memoir clearly is not independent. Your second argument is WP:ALLORNOTHING. Maybe there are other articles that should be deleted (or maybe not)...

HerrHeulsuse (talk) 05:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC) This seems to be like a WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. Population lists are not WP:NOTDB unless it lists down an entire...

others are as well. BostonMensa (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING. LibStar (talk) 22:22, 26 March 2023 (UTC) Delete - not enough in-depth...

--HanzoHattori 18:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC) Excellent use of WP:ALLORNOTHING. Crazysuit 04:13, 24 October 2007 (UTC) Delete. List the few notable...

think the other AfD's result is irrelevant to this discussion, as per WP:ALLORNOTHING. And for the sake of debate, why would a program broadcast on a national...

I know nothing of the WoW portal deletion, and furthermore, per WP:ALLORNOTHING it doesn't matter if a similar page is deleted, each page is discussed...

under that category should be deleted as well. Gururaj 007 (talk) WP:ALLORNOTHING. - Vianello (talk) 21:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

December 2008 (UTC) This isn't the place for that kind of thing. See WP:ALLORNOTHING, WP:WAX, and WP:ITSA. flaminglawyerc 16:40, 27 December 2008 (UTC) Actually...

de los Ojos Tristes Martin (di?) 22:23, May 5, 2021 (UTC) That's WP:ALLORNOTHING. Why does this article specifically meet WP:GNG?--Rusf10 (talk) 22:56...

fictional topics - nothing non-notable should be on Wikipedia. Also, see WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:OTHERSTUFF. Doctorfluffy (talk) 08:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)...

(talk) 02:15, 5 February 2026 (UTC) Comment: Seem to be a case of WP:ALLORNOTHING. But in this case there seem to be enough secondary sources suggesting...

category, in this case schools, is not a basis for delete decisions. See WP:ALLORNOTHING. Valerius 02:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC) So you're saying it should be...

Speedy keep. The nominator seems not to have read WP:DEL#REASON or WP:ALLORNOTHING. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 20:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Speedy keep. Notable...

nominate it for deletion. LibStar (talk) 04:37, 2 November 2022 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING applies here too to your reasoning. LibStar (talk) 04:41, 2 November...

these individually. Your argument seems like a classic example of WP:ALLORNOTHING, which in general, is not very strong. I agree that a large number of...

my vote. Thank you.KellyAna (talk) 18:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC) See WP:ALLORNOTHING. – sgeureka t•c 18:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC) And your point? Did you bother...

with WP:JNN, and due to the motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC) That seems fair. I did...

nominations should be avoided in these cases as many users will employ an WP:ALLORNOTHING approach. Frank Anchor 15:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC) Delete season articles...

2022 (EST) Same as my comment at the AfD of Anthony Phillips: NB WP:ALLORNOTHING, at a minimum need to demonstrate satisfying the GNG here. Regards, --Goldsztajn...

That is generally a bad argument to make. See WP:OTHERSTUFF, and WP:ALLORNOTHING. VG ☎ 17:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC) We'll gladly look at those for deletion...

Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (specifically WP:ALLORNOTHING). With apologies for contradicting you we're not required to cover every...

consensus can change and 2) such an argument is essentially Wikipedia:ALLORNOTHING anyway. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 16:07, 11...

any fault in keeping these articles. P.S I'm not trying to reason WP:ALLORNOTHING! --Zayeem (talk) 08:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not...

with WP:JNN, and due to the motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

keep side to state how this article meets WP:NOTABILITY. To quote WP:ALLORNOTHING "The status of articles on other similar topics has no necessary bearing...

with WP:JNN, and due to the motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

should go too. Nigej (talk) 14:33, 1 April 2018 (UTC) Please see WP:ALLORNOTHING. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC) My point...

fail to see the difference between this userbox and other boxes. Not to ALLORNOTHING, but what's the difference between this and, say, {{User:UBX/chess}}...

independent media to support WP:N. A reminder to one of the prior posters: WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a valid argument for either deleting or keeping an article. B...

but still. Simon Bar Sinister (talk) 06:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC) See WP:ALLORNOTHING; another possibility is if we consider this article individually and...

Worship Orange, we should delete them all. Perhaps you too could read WP:ALLORNOTHING. At very least, if the individual albums do not merit inclusion (which...

its own article.Lukeno94 (talk) 17:42, 8 November 2012 (UTC) Per WP:ALLORNOTHING, "The status of articles on other similar topics has no necessary bearing...

their respective fates were known. While I'm not trying to argue WP:ALLORNOTHING or WP:DELETEALL, I think any discussion about whether interpretating...

win people to your side. Also, I feel it prudent to refer you to WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - just because of the abducted children (which...

similar topics has no necessary bearing on a particular article" (WP:ALLORNOTHING). Guoguo12--Talk--  17:57, 30 December 2010 (UTC) Keep. WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST...

with WP:JNN, and due to the motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

NYC, London, or any other place else besides the above stations. WP:ALLORNOTHING is generally not a valid argument in AfD. Also, Whether articles already...

for it? FrozenPurpleCube 19:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC) In other words, WP:ALLORNOTHING. In all honesty, yes, all of those should go. I have frequently removed...

campaigns prior to Top Model. Also, please read WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ALLORNOTHING. WereWolf (talk) 15:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete purely highly...

or no other edits outside this topic. Please see WP:WHATABOUT, and WP:ALLORNOTHING. You're welcome to add WP:Reliable sources about him, if you can find...

2013 (UTC) FYI, your comment is not a valid argumentation as per WP:ALLORNOTHING and so it will be ignored by the admins. Please, provide independent...

21 March 2007 (UTC) I believe the policy you are looking for is WP:ALLORNOTHING. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 01:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC) So you do agree...

given names should not be mentioned at all in MOS:DAB; similarly, WP:ALLORNOTHING is being implied here, yet this is not a valid reason for either keeping...

doesn't mean this one necessarily should be. The nom sounds a lot like WP:ALLORNOTHING. If there are independent reliable sources for the game, especially 3...

~ Wikihermit 20:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC) Nice, two in one: WP:JUSTAVOTE and WP:ALLORNOTHING.--WaltCip 20:07, 21 July 2007 (UTC) Well, nobody's really citing policies...

doesn't even has any 'site notice' nor an author of the review read WP:ALLORNOTHING ('urban dead' related) mabdul 22:04, 21 November 2011 (UTC) Oh and the...

Reyes is simply running for office, there's a difference. It isn't an WP:ALLORNOTHING situation, each article is assessed on its own merits. - SudoGhost 02:35...

should be gone too. --Howard the Duck 15:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING. The status of articles on other similar topics has no bearing on a particular...

given names should not be mentioned at all in MOS:DAB; similarly, WP:ALLORNOTHING is being implied here, yet this is not a valid reason for either keeping...

should be deleted." A412 (Talk * C) 03:11, 31 January 2012 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING Mythpage88 (talk) 04:54, 31 January 2012 (UTC) Keep all. After some reflection...

deleted. Flickerd (talk) 09:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC) Are you aware that WP:ALLORNOTHING is not an argument to use at AfD? Chris Troutman (talk) 09:46, 11 April...

12 December 2014 (UTC) User:G-13114, please, read this carefully: WP:ALLORNOTHING. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC) Many of the Metrolink...

isn't worthy of this article, please read the guideline entitled WP:ALLORNOTHING. • Freechild'sup? 04:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC) It's ok for a category to...

etc. --Adi Sinaga (talk) 08:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC) Comment See WP:ALLORNOTHING. Arguing that this is not a notable missing persons topic is certainly...

Please try to read WP:N, WP:V, and WP:VG/S. While you're at it, read WP:ALLORNOTHING regarding the other thousands of Wiki game articles. MuZemike (talk)...

exist (as well as a template); this is a bad argument (a variation of WP:ALLORNOTHING or WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS). Otherwise, the nominator could win the AfD and...

(UTC) Comment while just an essay, you might want to have a look at WP:ALLORNOTHING. Got any reliable sources to back up that claim? It's still a weak claim...

--Fbifriday (talk) 07:20, 10 March 2013 (UTC) I think you meant WP:ALLORNOTHING, AnemoneProjectors. ;-) --GentlemanGhost (talk) 02:56, 15 March 2013...

Talk ! 10:03, 7 December 2022 (EST) I would encourage reading WP:ALLORNOTHING. If a subject/person etc cannot demonstrate notability based of this...

rationale. Also, this paragraph is essentially OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and ALLORNOTHING which doesn't usually fly at AfDs for the reasons discussed on those...

coverage in her own right, she meets WP:BIO. the nominator is using a WP:ALLORNOTHING argument which should be avoided. yes initially it was because of her...

dab pages! ∞ΣɛÞ² (τ|c) 03:00, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Please refer to WP:ALLORNOTHING. Note that the disambig is very recent, but doesn't seem to be in line...

deleted in the past means this library article must be deleted? Curious WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. There are more secondary sources on this library than the NYT...

nominated. Also the inclusion of Vortex in this nom is borderline WP:ALLORNOTHING The rest should be deleted or redirected to a minor character list per...

dedicated to them" is not an argument to keep this specific article WP:ALLORNOTHING. And I would also be in favor of deleting Iniga von Thurn und Taxis for...

the mood of shoving WP:ITSNOTABLE in our faces, yet clearly ignore WP:ALLORNOTHING on the same page. SashaNein (talk) 15:44, 25 September 2008 (UTC) "Klonoa"...

arguments here have boiled down to WP:ILIKEIT, WP:ABOUTEVERYTHING, and WP:ALLORNOTHING. I can see how a fan of the series would find this list helpful, and...

this out there. StringTheory11 (t • c) 04:01, 8 November 2012 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING, and besides I would support deletion of those articles as well for the...

Comment I strongly suggest that you read WP:POINT, WP:SOURCES, and WP:ALLORNOTHING. In particular relation to your use of articles to verify related but...

individual characters are not. --T-rex 15:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 15:12...

day. PamD (talk) 19:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC) It sounds good, except WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a valid reason to keep or delete a redirect. This is a case in...

(talk) 20:32, 7 August 2014 (UTC) Precedent's not a good word, per WP:ALLORNOTHING. And yes, getting input from other editors would definitely have to take...

treatment. ImmortalWizard(chat) 21:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC) See WP:ALLORNOTHING. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC) '@ChrisTheDude:...

this information"? You're saying that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and it's WP:ALLORNOTHING. But we're discussing this list article, not similar ones. The Mario...

given names should not be mentioned at all in MOS:DAB; similarly, WP:ALLORNOTHING is being implied here, yet this is not a valid reason for either keeping...

Richard☺Decal (talk) 14:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC) Richard WP:OTHERSTUFF , WP:ALLORNOTHING , WP:ARBITRARY (top 100 coins) are arguments to avoid at AfD. Labelled...

15:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC) An interesting mix of WP:ITSNOTABLE, WP:ALLORNOTHING and "Other shit exists" in other words? ╟─TreasuryTag►person of reasonable...

First, Wikipedia cannot be a source for articles. Second, please see WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:WHATABOUT. Third, big tent parties generally exist in pluralistic...

in Utah. Lugnuts (talk) 09:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC) Per WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING, the sole fact that there are other similar articles is not a valid keep...

my recommendation above), but I am also obliged to point out that WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a valid reason for either keeping or deleting (never mind midget...

October 2021 (UTC) @Yetanotherkiwi, please see WP:WHATABOUTX and WP:ALLORNOTHING in regards to consistency and drawing comparisons to other articles....

— kikichugirl inquire 07:58, 14 December 2014 (UTC) Quidster4040, WP:ALLORNOTHING isn't a valid argument. Tchaliburton (talk) 08:33, 14 December 2014 (UTC)...

argument to avoid in deletion discussions—for the reasons noted at WP:ALLORNOTHING. I am not arguing that all the cast of Survivor 2 ought to have articles...

articles. --NickPenguin(contribs) 01:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC) See WP:ALLORNOTHING. No one here is suggesting that we create 40,000 "Fooians in Barland"...

concerned. 23skidoo (talk) 18:05, 6 February 2008 (UTC) Neither is WP:ALLORNOTHING. The status of articles on other similar topics has no bearing on a particular...

Phalle's article or her works, it is about Kit Carson Park. Also, WP:ALLORNOTHING - it's about the individual merit of the park, not the merit of the park...

presuming notability of this article. Also read WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ALLORNOTHING, so you can avoid your above kind of argument in a deletion discussion...

diffrent moderators for diffrent languages english should accept too. WP:ALLORNOTHING so if you delete this article you have to delete every single mod or...

biography pages on wikipedia.--Hack 00:52, 12 March 2007 (UTC) See WP:ALLORNOTHING on why this is not a valid argument. meshach 01:48, 12 March 2007 (UTC)...

capitalization.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 00:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a valid argument for either keeping or deleting a redirect. WP:RFD#KEEP...

this article needs to fulfill WP:PRODUCT. Also, of course you used WP:ALLORNOTHING as an argument (why else would you write it here, then?) and statements...

16:49, 23 October 2007 (UTC) Delete. These arguments are WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING. --Thinboy00 talk/contribs 20:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC) Comment Furthermore...

Comment Please do not present the WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument or the WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. There is no possibility of simultaneously nominating for deletion...

possibility of the main article's being deleted is a variation of WP:ALLORNOTHING and is not convincing. WP:NOT#IINFO is policy, as is WP:NOT#DIR; WP:CRUFT...

Karma-AH (talk) 14:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ALLORNOTHING make it that your arguments don't make a valid rationale to keep the...

classic example of an argument to avoid in deletion discussions. See WP:ALLORNOTHING. —Granger (talk · contribs) 20:45, 22 October 2014 (UTC) Yep. But for...

Necrothesp (talk) 11:25, 15 February 2023 (UTC) WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:ALLORNOTHING. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:18, 15 February 2023 (UTC) It makes absolutely...

January 2017 (UTC) Sounds like a combination of WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ALLORNOTHING. Is the only argument that this template is "important"?—Bagumba (talk)...

care of by creating the appropriate redirect as needed (note that WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a valid reason for either deleting or keeping an article or redirect)...

so should the other one.--SefringleTalk 04:17, 26 June 2007 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING? Why shouldn't each be considered on its own merits, especially since...

BenjaminHomerBoyd (talk) 12:09, 19 April 2019 (UTC) Add WP:BIG, WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:ADHOM to the list. It doesn't matter how many festivals his work...

applied in all cases. Superstevegs (talk) 23:47, 22 May 2010 (UTC) See WP:ALLORNOTHING. If someone nominates Lace Market Theatre for deletion, I would probably...

reason for deletion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:58, 4 December 2015 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING comes under arguments to avoid in a deletion discussion. There is a consensus...

--G-Dett 16:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING Kla'quot 17:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC) Comment - WP:ALLORNOTHING is at best a slogan, but certainly isn't...

either. Since this discussion has already started, I'm not going WP:ALLORNOTHING here. Tuxide 00:56, 27 September 2007 (UTC) Weak delete Going with WP:RUBBISH...

satisfactory and the arguments against all seem to be the weak argument of WP:ALLORNOTHING. Colonel Warden (talk) 14:36, 25 December 2009 (UTC) Delete. Very junior...

couple of points for the delete !votes: please remember WP:NTEMP, WP:ALLORNOTHING and AfD is not clean up. Some RSs all of which discuss religious (sectarian)...

than Star trek and Star Wars. Furthermore, it's best to not do a WP:ALLORNOTHING here.64.180.83.71 00:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Sorry, that's my IP addr...

Deletion/retention of other articles relating to music charts has no bearing (WP:ALLORNOTHING). ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 20:49, 13 September 2011 (UTC) Keep Google 12 links...

NYC, London, or any other place else besides the above stations. WP:ALLORNOTHING is generally not a valid argument in AfD. Also, Whether articles already...

Nurg (talk) 02:45, 1 September 2021 (UTC) @Nurg: The solution to the WP:ALLORNOTHING (which is not a convincing argument why this shouldn't be deleted) is...

15:42, 4 October 2010 (UTC) Comment Nominator appears to be arguing WP:ALLORNOTHING. I do agree with those who request unbundling, as there are several champions...

certainly the case for the list we discuss here and so we're good. Per WP:ALLORNOTHING, we are not required to sort models into some universal and uniform scheme...

notable? Moreover, IZAK, in regard to your (a) point I urge you to view WP:ALLORNOTHING which states, "The status of articles on other similar topics has no...

time carried his name.  Frank  |  talk  20:04, 26 October 2009 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a valid argument for either keeping or deleting redirects. Your...

"best of" subjects in order to defend this one (see WP:OTHERCRAP, WP:ALLORNOTHING, and straw man), I would imagine "best song" would also fit that bill...

5 March 2017 (UTC) Again with the WP:ALLORNOTHING. I read WP:ALLORNOTHING and I understand [[WP:ALLORNOTHING, I just don't agree with it. It's an essay...

5 September 2007 (UTC) Comment Could you please avoid WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING. Kwsn(Ni!) 16:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC) My bad. All I'm really trying...

literally a copy-paste job, and instead is trying to cling on to WP:ALLORNOTHING. It's already here, and there's no reason to think that WP:BURDEN fell...

United States on Alexa and #11,519 most popular site in the world. WP:ALLORNOTHING The article is consistent with articles in the Category:Automotive_p...

talk – evidence   19:15, 12 July 2009 (UTC) Hmm, guess we have to WP:ALLORNOTHING {{Infobox Simpsons episode}} too? ViperSnake151  Talk  22:58, 14 July...

as there is of the others, eg. not much. Without getting into an WP:ALLORNOTHING situation, I think we need to be conscious of precedent. My position...

to be scientifically useful. As for other objectors, please recall WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:OTHERSTUFF. Even if each and every one of those earthquakes is...

--Agamemnon2 (talk) 22:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC) Please note WP:PERNOM and WP:ALLORNOTHING. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 04:23...

at the arguments, rather than how the editors are voting. See also WP:ALLORNOTHING. But actually, FYI, the material was not completely removed from global...

individual basis. The level of notability can vary from play to play so an WP:ALLORNOTHING nomination does not seem appropriate here. Some of these plays directly...

the deletion of the articles pertaining to Glover or Dowding. See WP:ALLORNOTHING for that. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)...

notability. The creator will please stop using arguments such as WP:ALLORNOTHING as well as canvassing for votes. --Dhartung | Talk 06:29, 15 January...

couple of weeks ago by a small group of bored people. Argumentation by WP:ALLORNOTHING is not helpful. If you have problems with sections of Hide and seek please...

--Balloholic (talk) 22:42, 20 December 2008 (UTC) You seem to have an WP:ALLORNOTHING mentality. Well, if you believe major historic thoroughfares in major...

TerriersFan (talk) 03:46, 21 March 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ALLORNOTHING. Please address this specific article.--Atlantima (talk) 15:29, 21 March...

category was hurled into a chaotic AfD with an apparent disregard for WP:ALLORNOTHING.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:47, 20 January 2019 (UTC) Keep all and...

EXIST for that matter) is not relevant to this discussion. See also WP:ALLORNOTHING. --Pontificalibus (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2011 (UTC) To repeat, Wikipedia:Notability...

composers have discographys doesn’t make this one less important. (WP:ALLORNOTHING) It’s not inconceivable that this list could one day be complete. There...

they should never be considered to have zero cost. (I recognize that WP:ALLORNOTHING apples to these individual decisions, but there should be a coherent...

article. Janus303 (talk) 04:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC) Comment This is the WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. If any of the other 2010 flight diversions have been the subject...

(talk) 16:44, 10 December 2017 (UTC) What a moronic argument. See WP:ALLORNOTHING. (And when did The New York Times become "the local press"?) — Malik...

WP:USEFUL, WP:INTERESTING, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:ALLORNOTHING, whereas the delete were mainly based around WP:NOT#INFO and WP:N. The...

presence of other such articles has no bearing on having this one: WP:ALLORNOTHING. Other deletion arguments about notability of specific individuals listed...

Comment And thus we see the problem with using WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:ALLORNOTHING as a rationale for keeping an article - somebody may take you seriously...

reasoning aside from historical purposes is that of WP:IDONTLIKEIT or WP:ALLORNOTHING, which are not valid reasons to delete redirects (or articles in general)...

because you want to use the WP:OTHERSTUFF claim to justify this set. WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a valid argument. And I stand corrected, you only created one...

doesn't mean this one necessarily should be. The nom sounds a lot like WP:ALLORNOTHING. If there are independent reliable sources for the game, then this game...

editors. MuZemike (talk) 17:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC) It is not an WP:ALLORNOTHING choice. The status of other articles has no bearing on this article....

--BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:30, 17 August 2013 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a reason for keeping. It has been explained above that enclave...

as there is no mention of the character in the target (side note: WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a viable reason for deletion, however. Should the name be re-inserted...

relevant to this discussion as per WP:ALLORNOTHING Bardcom (talk) 18:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC) The WP:ALLORNOTHING rule is created to prevent discussions...

HerrHeulsuse (talk) 05:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC) This seems to be like a WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. Population lists are not WP:NOTDB unless it lists down an entire...

single userbox that expresses a personal opinion or we keep them. See WP:ALLORNOTHING for an explanation as to why your reasoning is less than valid. That...

size of the nom, if I had only nominated a few, we'd then be hearing WP:ALLORNOTHING... - jc37 18:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 'Fictional boxers' is no more of...

IP templates, but that's not at issue here; see WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ALLORNOTHING. I'm pleased to discuss this template with you, but could you explain...

(UTC) Urthogie is absolutely right, Mowsbury. This is a WP:POINT and WP:ALLORNOTHING hostage-type situation. The editors creating these articles don't believe...

Montevideo-related topics. --Góngora (Talk) 17:42, 25 May 2011 (UTC) WP:MERCY and WP:ALLORNOTHING are not reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 08:20, 30 May 2011 (UTC) Speedy...

--Balloholic (talk) 22:42, 20 December 2008 (UTC) You seem to have an WP:ALLORNOTHING mentality. Well, if you believe major historic thoroughfares in major...

HerrHeulsuse (talk) 05:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC) This seems to be like a WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. Population lists are not WP:NOTDB unless it lists down an entire...

--Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 12:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC) Basicly WP:ALLORNOTHING. FWIW most articles in that category probably should also be merged or...

contribs) 14:20, 24 December 2009 (UTC) I would point out the essay WP:ALLORNOTHING suggests that this is considered a poor argument. Stifle (talk) 15:08...

Canadian conversation!). Third, your argument along the lines of WP:ALLORNOTHING fails on a very simple premise - just because someone had the ambition...

October 2010 (UTC) Keep. (defective nom.) The nomination is a form of WP:ALLORNOTHING. This story has significance beyond immediate news and this article does...

WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC) Playing the WP:ALLORNOTHING card?—Bagumba (talk) 03:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

Similarly with something like this, you have something close to an Wikipedia:ALLORNOTHING. What is and is not "trivia" is really subjective; some might say that...

motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Note - WP:ALLORNOTHING is actually an argument against bundling...

nominated. Also the inclusion of Vortex in this nom is borderline WP:ALLORNOTHING The rest should be deleted or redirected to a minor character list per...

how this is defining was not explained, nor are WP:OTHERSTUFF or WP:ALLORNOTHING particularly strong arguments. Kbdank71 14:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC) Category:Herbert...

leagues in question. J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 02:19, 31 May 2011 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING seems relevant. Discuss this article on its own merits. —Bagumba (talk)...

HerrHeulsuse (talk) 05:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC) This seems to be like a WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. Population lists are not WP:NOTDB unless it lists down an entire...

the argument "should delete every other crypto article as well" is WP:ALLORNOTHING or WP:OTHERSTUFF, market cap (which varies by factors weekly) and rankings...

Keep as expression of a view, but appalled at the bandying about of WP:ALLORNOTHING! ck lostsword • T • C 11:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC) Keep Userspace doesn't...

your last sentence there is very much in the argument to avoid camp. WP:ALLORNOTHING. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:43, 31 December 2012 (UTC) WP:ATA...

not make it acceptable to break it (and 3RR) in others. Please see WP:ALLORNOTHING. "The status of articles on other similar topics has no necessary bearing...

Johnuniq (talk) 05:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC) Cdogsimmons, you're using an WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. LibStar (talk) 16:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC) I put it in those terms...

them. Nigej (talk) 18:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC) We wouldn't, as WP:ALLORNOTHING clearly states. Keeping one template of a kind doesn't mean a similar...

is actually posted in XfDs (like WP:SOFIXIT, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:ALLORNOTHING, WP:SLOBBERINGFANBOY, or WP:USEITORLOSEIT) as the abbreviation itself...

understanding, but please be aware that it is a form of WP:WAX or WP:ALLORNOTHING to say that because one article is kept, other similar articles should...

(talk) 15:40, 1 February 2018‎ Please avoid using WP:ALLORNOTHING as an argument for or against deletion.--WaltCip (talk) 15:48, 1 February...

portals because some are of poor quality or not well-maintained is an WP:ALLORNOTHING approach that throws out the baby with the bathwater. The focus should...

out of Chicago several times a year for perhaps the last 50 years." WP:ALLORNOTHING Are you arguing the nothing side wrt contracting in Chicago? Hugh (talk)...

did seem to exist to rename SCORCHEDEARTH, so I have done so, to WP:ALLORNOTHING. -- Renesis (talk) 19:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC) The essay Wikipedia:Arguments...

invoked the idea that "if this page goes, lots of others will too" (WP:ALLORNOTHING), I couldn't honestly suggest it here, since the authors and awards are...

be ignored for purely WP:ALLORNOTHING arguments. Mackan79 13:24, 1 August 2007 (UTC) Wrong, this is not "purely WP:ALLORNOTHING". The article Allegations...

troubling for the existence of this article. Still on the basis of WP:ALLORNOTHING, I would have to say that my decision would be a fairly week keep. Keep...

obligation to bring all articles that qualify for the same reason, WP:ALLORNOTHING. Jay32183 01:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Comment. Firstly, it satisfies...

Include If you remove this, you will have to remove the whole section. AllOrNothing (talk) 20:28, 14 August 2026 (UTC) Remove Article y doesn't mention this...

to write a well-referenced, neutral encyclopedia article," claims WP:ALLORNOTHING (essay). Guoguo12--Talk--  19:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC) You can quote...

grudge against Eyster. Moreover, anyone who tries to argue WP:OSE or WP:ALLORNOTHING in an AfD is usually informed fairly quickly that those are not valid...

intersections of ethnicity and nationality. (So I'll likely ignore cries of WP:ALLORNOTHING or WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.) This is just too vague. How far back do we go...

grounds of WP:IDONTLIKEIT and nothing else." Invoking WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ALLORNOTHING principles to refute arguments: "if there is a true difference even according...

notability. Your argument about every street in the world is debunked at WP:ALLORNOTHING. Colonel Warden (talk) 10:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC) Keep sufficient...

solved through normal editing. - 06:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC) Also see WP:ALLORNOTHING. When someone says, "If you delete X you will also need to delete Y"...

Bloomingdales locations (which is older), given that this is part of a WP:ALLORNOTHING motive. Tuxide 04:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC) Delete all. WP:NOT a directory...

unencyclopedic. Stifle (talk) 13:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Please note Wikipedia:ALLORNOTHING, WP:JNN, and WP:UNENCYC. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des...

April 2010 (UTC) This (3after3's comment) strikes me as a bit of an WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. It is not usually the case that we list all works of an academic...

times reliably sourced [3]. Edison (talk) 21:03, 18 July 2008 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a good argument. — Bellhalla (talk) 12:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)...

Wikipedia:Editing policy. Maybe you should look at WP:ABOUTEVERYTHING and WP:ALLORNOTHING for a clearer view on "preserving" everything. --PatrickD 21:01, 14 March...

but if they did exist we would judge them on their own merits per WP:ALLORNOTHING, also do we have articles that criticize George Bush, by the way someone...

Potts. You seem to be living in some weird alternate universe where WP:ALLORNOTHING is a legitimate deletion argument, at least in regard to TV characters...

Godknowme1 (talk) 01:25, 12 March 2025 (UTC) What you're saying is WP:ALLORNOTHING. Vestrian24Bio 02:51, 18 March 2025 (UTC) WP:OSE if you think other season...

evidence of third party sources to establish notability? Secondly WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 02:57, 3 July 2011 (UTC)...

(TALK) 09:10, 8 August 2009 (UTC) This is an argument to avoid per WP:ALLORNOTHING, "The status of articles on other similar topics has no bearing on a...

--WuTang94 (talk) 22:55, 3 April 2020 (UTC) That would be a WP:POINTY, WP:ALLORNOTHING argument.—Bagumba (talk) 16:01, 4 April 2020 (UTC) Do not delete. The...

deleting this article. Dogposter 15:31, 15 August 2009 (UTC) Please see WP:ALLORNOTHING. Most topics form a spectrum in which there are notable cases and then...

Chingachinga needs to read WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, WP:IDONTLIKEIT and WP:ALLORNOTHING not to mention that the rambling above sounds very much like a personal...

--G-Dett 16:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING Kla'quot 17:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC) Comment - WP:ALLORNOTHING is at best a slogan, but certainly isn't...

Kronnang Dunn (talk) 06:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC) That is kind of a WP:ALLORNOTHING falacy. Notability is not related to to people being interested in a...

WP:IDONTKNOWIT WP:UNKNOWNHERE WP:ITSA WP:NOTINHERITED WP:WAX WP:OTHERSTUFF WP:ALLORNOTHING WP:EVERYTHING WP:ABOUTEVERYTHING WP:LOSE WP:EFFORT WP:NOEFFORT WP:NOTCLEANUP...

will have 15,000 sister categories in short order' sound allot like WP:ALLORNOTHING. The fact is, we already have a large number of eponymous band categories...

under the same principle.Kagegod (talk) 01:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING. FatherJack92 (talk) 13:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC) All articles on fictional...

disclosed. S0091 (talk) 21:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC) Also see Wikipedia:ALLORNOTHING. ''Flux55'' (talk) 21:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC) If you want to use other...

(talk) 20:42, 6 May 2021 (UTC) So now you're shifted to pushing a WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. The existence of the other articles are irrelevant. We are...

notability guideline provided. See also WP:ALLORNOTHING. Hmlarson (talk) 17:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING do not apply here, now I know that you...

created precisely this template, and don't tell me I'm wrong for applying ALLORNOTHING when every single argument will be exactly like this because every single...

Worship Orange, we should delete them all. Perhaps you too could read WP:ALLORNOTHING. At very least, if the individual albums do not merit inclusion (which...

what you're getting at) is a pretty transparent appeal to WP:WAX/WP:ALLORNOTHING. Not going to win you any hearts and minds here. Skomorokh incite 23:42...

02:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC) I see your argument is equivalent to WP:ALLORNOTHING, which is invalid. Besides, the answer to your question is NO. Some idioms...

satisfy some purported conceptual consistency. So your WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING jeremiads about an endless flow of all possible subjective lists, because...

delete thousands of others. Zagalejo^^^ 02:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING. And, as for setting a precedent...that's fine with me, that's why I...

(talk) 07:28, 15 April 2013 (UTC) This should not be bundled as an WP:ALLORNOTHING proposition. This is about the need for standalone lists which enumerate...

administrator takes into account that many of the keep votes were WP:ALLORNOTHING strategic votes by Israeli focussed editors, thus obscuring the "consensus"...

then it should be removed in both articles: It's not necessarily WP:ALLORNOTHING. We need to evaluate this page on its own merits and context.—Bagumba...

because it was notable enough. We should avoid basing this decision on WP:ALLORNOTHING. --Parsifal Hello 21:51, 23 August 2007 (UTC) Keep - Subject seems to...

Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. See: WP:OLDARTICLE and WP:ALLORNOTHING. And >90% of software articles here do establish notability, e.g., CERN...

(UTC) Urthogie is absolutely right, Mowsbury. This is a WP:POINT and WP:ALLORNOTHING hostage-type situation. The editors creating these articles don't believe...

(which have yet to be demonstrated) or "importance". I don't like the WP:ALLORNOTHING claims that I have seen in other related AfDs and the removal of prods...

notable? Moreover, IZAK, in regard to your (a) point I urge you to view WP:ALLORNOTHING which states, "The status of articles on other similar topics has no...

be ignored for purely WP:ALLORNOTHING arguments. Mackan79 13:24, 1 August 2007 (UTC) Wrong, this is not "purely WP:ALLORNOTHING". The article Allegations...

win people to your side. Also, I feel it prudent to refer you to WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - just because of the abducted children (which...

--Agamemnon2 (talk) 19:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Please note Wikipedia:ALLORNOTHING. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 19:29...

gotta keep.Deltopia 04:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC) WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS and WP:ALLORNOTHING are relevant here. -- Kesh 04:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC) These are references...

unencyclopedic. Stifle (talk) 13:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Please note Wikipedia:ALLORNOTHING, WP:JNN, and WP:UNENCYC. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des...

LeilaniLad (talk) 01:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Hmm, then, I hate to make WP:ALLORNOTHING but you're invoking WP:OTHERSTUFF, and there's an awful lot you'd have...

content dispute. He further accuses our voting as being based on WP:ALLORNOTHING (which is neither a policy or guideline, but rather an essay), despite...

under the same principle.Kagegod (talk) 01:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING. FatherJack92 (talk) 13:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC) All articles on fictional...

which features two members of Eve 6?. Look, Wikipedia isn't a game of WP:ALLORNOTHING, the fact is your band simply doesn't meet WP:MUSIC, "it's only a matter...

WKRN, and on CNN. Also, deleters argument seems to be falling into WP:ALLORNOTHING. - Smashville 16:42, 1 September 2007 (UTC) Keep or merge and redirect...

understanding, but please be aware that it is a form of WP:WAX or WP:ALLORNOTHING to say that because one article is kept, other similar articles should...

there are issues that open-up systemic-wide violations of NPOV, the allornothing essay does not apply. It is the responsibility of editors to protect...

obligation to bring all articles that qualify for the same reason, WP:ALLORNOTHING. Jay32183 01:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Comment. Firstly, it satisfies...

should go too. Nigej (talk) 14:33, 1 April 2018 (UTC) Please see WP:ALLORNOTHING. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC) My point...

Majin Gojira 12:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC) Comment WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:ALLORNOTHING -- IslaySolomon | talk 12:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC) Response Second inapplicable...

composers have discographys doesn’t make this one less important. (WP:ALLORNOTHING) It’s not inconceivable that this list could one day be complete. There...

Scotland. As for the previous AfD on consulates in different cities, see WP:ALLORNOTHING. --Oakshade (talk) 16:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC) Can you demonstrate...

notability. The creator will please stop using arguments such as WP:ALLORNOTHING as well as canvassing for votes. --Dhartung | Talk 06:29, 15 January...

presence of other such articles has no bearing on having this one: WP:ALLORNOTHING. Other deletion arguments about notability of specific individuals listed...

so should the other one.--SefringleTalk 04:17, 26 June 2007 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING? Why shouldn't each be considered on its own merits, especially since...

intersections of ethnicity and nationality. (So I'll likely ignore cries of WP:ALLORNOTHING or WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.) This is just too vague. How far back do we go...

on wikipedia.Wild ste 09:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC) Try to avoid WP:ALLORNOTHING, though it does add to the rather impressive amount of policy discussed...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a reason for keeping an article, and the keep argument fails to...

certainly the case for the list we discuss here and so we're good. Per WP:ALLORNOTHING, we are not required to sort models into some universal and uniform scheme...

and the number of notable alumni are in my view irrelevant (as is WP:ALLORNOTHING, which is about articles). -- roundhouse0 (talk) 00:55, 22 April 2008...

Keep to the following: WP:LOSE, WP:EFFORT, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, and WP:ALLORNOTHING. Most of the arguments being made in support seem to fall under one or...

from WP:ATA a combination of - WP:LOSE, WP:OTHERSTUFF, WP:USEFUL, WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:PROBLEM, without providing a clear explanation as to why it should...

do it a few at a time, then we can and should. (As opposed to an WP:ALLORNOTHING argument.) - jc37 23:45, 31 August 2008 (UTC) Rename all per nom and...

15:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC) It most certainly is WP:WAX, as well as WP:ALLORNOTHING, which is equally invalid. Your concern may be shared among a subset...

doesn't mean this one necessarily should be. The nom sounds a lot like WP:ALLORNOTHING. If there are independent reliable sources for the game, especially 3...

(UTC) I'm glad that you agee with me, Jtalledo, but that's a bit WP:ALLORNOTHING or WP:WHATABOUTX. I think getting rid of a couple of those (for instance...

diffrent moderators for diffrent languages english should accept too. WP:ALLORNOTHING so if you delete this article you have to delete every single mod or...

LeilaniLad (talk) 01:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Hmm, then, I hate to make WP:ALLORNOTHING but you're invoking WP:OTHERSTUFF, and there's an awful lot you'd have...

opinion. However, I would like to say that here is a situation where WP:ALLORNOTHING might come up. So remember not to use that line. --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδιτоr...

relevant to this discussion as per WP:ALLORNOTHING Bardcom (talk) 18:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC) The WP:ALLORNOTHING rule is created to prevent discussions...

given names should not be mentioned at all in MOS:DAB; similarly, WP:ALLORNOTHING is being implied here, yet this is not a valid reason for either keeping...

but if they did exist we would judge them on their own merits per WP:ALLORNOTHING, also do we have articles that criticize George Bush, by the way someone...

Dragon 2, and Delta Force: Angel Falls should be deleted (WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING). However, as mentioned before, we are not talking about other articles...

every article of the same type for deletion to get a page deleted, WP:ALLORNOTHING. Jay32183 05:02, 26 July 2007 (UTC) I declare Ignore all rules. This...

2007 (UTC) Keep per DGG and invalid deletion rationale (similar to WP:ALLORNOTHING or WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). Ben Hocking (talk|contribs) —Preceding comment...

--Balloholic (talk) 22:42, 20 December 2008 (UTC) You seem to have an WP:ALLORNOTHING mentality. Well, if you believe major historic thoroughfares in major...

Dragon 2, and Delta Force: Angel Falls should be deleted (WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING). However, as mentioned before, we are not talking about other articles...

Chingachinga needs to read WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, WP:IDONTLIKEIT and WP:ALLORNOTHING not to mention that the rambling above sounds very much like a personal...

category, in this case schools, is not a basis for delete decisions. See WP:ALLORNOTHING. Valerius 02:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC) So you're saying it should be...

Ericoides (talk) 19:06, 29 February 2012 (UTC) Ah, our old friend the WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. If this thing does indeed lead to the other thing, there will...

WP:NOT#PLOT. However, that also doesn't mean one should go on an WP:ALLORNOTHING campaign to have every article about a book, movie, anime, or manga....

Protonk (talk) 23:37, 22 April 2008 (UTC) Avala, may I direct you to WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:POINT? I've removed your mega-block of text. Be careful, that...

Keep to the following: WP:LOSE, WP:EFFORT, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, and WP:ALLORNOTHING. Most of the arguments being made in support seem to fall under one or...

ahead and nominate them. --Wassermann 09:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC) See WP:ALLORNOTHING. utcursch | talk 15:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC) Your criteria for keeping...

main article. Also, precedence is more along the lines of WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING. Let's stick to policy, okay? McKay 17:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Did you...

SparsityProblem 05:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC) Comment This is an WP:ALLORNOTHING argument, which is discouraged in deletion discussions. The other examples...

needed in this discussion: Before editors leap in and accuse me of WP:ALLORNOTHING or WP:CRAP, perhaps consider that my argument is more based on precedent...

Vegaswikian 07:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC) Perhaps you should have a look at WP:ALLORNOTHING, WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, WP:EPISODES, and CSD A1 first. --Calton | Talk 01:42...

subject of this article, not of any WP:OTHERSTUFF and especially not WP:ALLORNOTHING. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 19:09, 15 March 2025 (UTC) @Rushtheeditor:...

because you want to use the WP:OTHERSTUFF claim to justify this set. WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a valid argument. And I stand corrected, you only created one...

banned, then so should most other bands" is not a valid argument per WP:ALLORNOTHING. When PRP! does release an album and it turns out to be even mildly successful...

Lundse 21:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Comment: Inappropriate use of WP:ALLORNOTHING supposition. Also, the anon provides no supporting evidence for the assertion...

possibility of the main article's being deleted is a variation of WP:ALLORNOTHING and is not convincing. WP:NOT#IINFO is policy, as is WP:NOT#DIR; WP:CRUFT...

government sites). To the IP who posted above: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:ALLORNOTHING are not valid arguments for either keeping or deleting. B.Wind (talk)...

21 March 2007 (UTC) I believe the policy you are looking for is WP:ALLORNOTHING. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 01:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC) So you do agree...

Comment Please do not present the WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument or the WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. There is no possibility of simultaneously nominating for deletion...

son's memoir clearly is not independent. Your second argument is WP:ALLORNOTHING. Maybe there are other articles that should be deleted (or maybe not)...

they'd oppose the group nom, and if you nominate a few then it's WP:ALLORNOTHING. I think the nominator's points are well taken. I don't think that this...

176 (talk • contribs) 21:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Have a look at WP:ALLORNOTHING. PhilKnight (talk) 23:06, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Keep Genuine reference...

individual characters are not. --T-rex 15:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 15:12...

article. Janus303 (talk) 04:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC) Comment This is the WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. If any of the other 2010 flight diversions have been the subject...

case basis, and I strongly oppose deletion because I feel that is a WP:ALLORNOTHING. MMetro (talk) 22:39, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Delete Not everyone in a...

Majin Gojira 12:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC) Comment WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:ALLORNOTHING -- IslaySolomon | talk 12:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC) Response Second inapplicable...

notability. Your argument about every street in the world is debunked at WP:ALLORNOTHING. Colonel Warden (talk) 10:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC) Keep sufficient...

my vote. Thank you.KellyAna (talk) 18:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC) See WP:ALLORNOTHING. – sgeureka t•c 18:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC) And your point? Did you bother...

WP:USEFUL, WP:INTERESTING, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:ALLORNOTHING, whereas the delete were mainly based around WP:NOT#INFO and WP:N. The...

Lundse 21:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Comment: Inappropriate use of WP:ALLORNOTHING supposition. Also, the anon provides no supporting evidence for the assertion...

(UTC) Comment while just an essay, you might want to have a look at WP:ALLORNOTHING. Got any reliable sources to back up that claim? It's still a weak claim...

dab pages! ∞ΣɛÞ² (τ|c) 03:00, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Please refer to WP:ALLORNOTHING. Note that the disambig is very recent, but doesn't seem to be in line...

independent media to support WP:N. A reminder to one of the prior posters: WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a valid argument for either deleting or keeping an article. B...

coverage in her own right, she meets WP:BIO. the nominator is using a WP:ALLORNOTHING argument which should be avoided. yes initially it was because of her...

Talk ! 10:03, 7 December 2022 (EST) I would encourage reading WP:ALLORNOTHING. If a subject/person etc cannot demonstrate notability based of this...

for it? FrozenPurpleCube 19:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC) In other words, WP:ALLORNOTHING. In all honesty, yes, all of those should go. I have frequently removed...

to be scientifically useful. As for other objectors, please recall WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:OTHERSTUFF. Even if each and every one of those earthquakes is...

isn't worthy of this article, please read the guideline entitled WP:ALLORNOTHING. • Freechild'sup? 04:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC) It's ok for a category to...

troubling for the existence of this article. Still on the basis of WP:ALLORNOTHING, I would have to say that my decision would be a fairly week keep. Keep...

purposeful disruption to make a point. DarkAudit 12:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING seems to be what applies here. Morgan Wick 18:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Delete...

either. Since this discussion has already started, I'm not going WP:ALLORNOTHING here. Tuxide 00:56, 27 September 2007 (UTC) Weak delete Going with WP:RUBBISH...

rationale. Also, this paragraph is essentially OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and ALLORNOTHING which doesn't usually fly at AfDs for the reasons discussed on those...

WP:CLN? Alansohn (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2009 (UTC) This appeal to WP:ALLORNOTHING is so tiresome. Otto4711 (talk) 18:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC) For those...

although this is not an argument against deletion (see WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ALLORNOTHING), this is one of the better sourced articles in the Category:Hospitality...

05:18, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Linked to from the WP:PRECEDENT page are WP:ALLORNOTHING, WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, WP:LOSE, and WP:EVERYTHING. And also, WP:Pokémon...

made few or no other edits outside this topic. Delete per WP:NPA, WP:ALLORNOTHING. I did a check on some of the references - at least one of the URLs for...

Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:15, 3 March 2008 (UTC) Keep. At the risk of WP:ALLORNOTHING, just about all the suburbs of Melbourne, where I live, have their own...

Montevideo-related topics. --Góngora (Talk) 17:42, 25 May 2011 (UTC) WP:MERCY and WP:ALLORNOTHING are not reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 08:20, 30 May 2011 (UTC) Speedy...

deleted in the past means this library article must be deleted? Curious WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. There are more secondary sources on this library than the NYT...

in Utah. Lugnuts (talk) 09:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC) Per WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING, the sole fact that there are other similar articles is not a valid keep...

this article needs to fulfill WP:PRODUCT. Also, of course you used WP:ALLORNOTHING as an argument (why else would you write it here, then?) and statements...

applied in all cases. Superstevegs (talk) 23:47, 22 May 2010 (UTC) See WP:ALLORNOTHING. If someone nominates Lace Market Theatre for deletion, I would probably...

couple of weeks ago by a small group of bored people. Argumentation by WP:ALLORNOTHING is not helpful. If you have problems with sections of Hide and seek please...

Johnuniq (talk) 05:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC) Cdogsimmons, you're using an WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. LibStar (talk) 16:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC) I put it in those terms...

November 2007 (UTC) You remembered WP:WAX, but you may have forgotten WP:ALLORNOTHING. We don't have to deal with all of the problem articles at once. One...

Wikipedia:Editing policy. Maybe you should look at WP:ABOUTEVERYTHING and WP:ALLORNOTHING for a clearer view on "preserving" everything. --PatrickD 21:01, 14 March...

consensus can change and 2) such an argument is essentially Wikipedia:ALLORNOTHING anyway. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 16:07, 11...

Bloomingdales locations (which is older), given that this is part of a WP:ALLORNOTHING motive. Tuxide 04:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC) Delete all. WP:NOT a directory...

--HanzoHattori 18:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC) Excellent use of WP:ALLORNOTHING. Crazysuit 04:13, 24 October 2007 (UTC) Delete. List the few notable...

portion of that essay that applies to the delete and merge arguments is WP:ALLORNOTHING. The points the essay Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions...

for deletion? — DIEGO talk 19:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC) That is an WP:ALLORNOTHING comment. But I'll try to answer anyway. It's been argued that even though...

We get it with the Natalie Holloway reference. Repeating the same WP:ALLORNOTHING argument over and over and over and over doesn't make it any more valid...

there are! GiantSnowman (talk) 11:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Comment: WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a useful argument. Stifle (talk) 15:24, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Comment...

one should not be deleted but rather that the others should be (cf. WP:ALLORNOTHING). --Flex (talk|contribs) 03:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC) Delete though perhaps...

editors. MuZemike (talk) 17:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC) It is not an WP:ALLORNOTHING choice. The status of other articles has no bearing on this article....

campaigns prior to Top Model. Also, please read WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ALLORNOTHING. WereWolf (talk) 15:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete purely highly...

15:42, 4 October 2010 (UTC) Comment Nominator appears to be arguing WP:ALLORNOTHING. I do agree with those who request unbundling, as there are several champions...

5 September 2007 (UTC) Comment Could you please avoid WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING. Kwsn(Ni!) 16:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC) My bad. All I'm really trying...

or no other edits outside this topic. Please see WP:WHATABOUT, and WP:ALLORNOTHING. You're welcome to add WP:Reliable sources about him, if you can find...

under that category should be deleted as well. Gururaj 007 (talk) WP:ALLORNOTHING. - Vianello (talk) 21:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

2008 (UTC+1) And again, you are trying to use the WP:WAX as well as WP:ALLORNOTHING deletion argument pitfalls. The article has needed a complete rewrite...

that the other article should be deleted as well. See WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING for more information. ttonyb (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC) Comment...

should be deleted." A412 (Talk * C) 03:11, 31 January 2012 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING Mythpage88 (talk) 04:54, 31 January 2012 (UTC) Keep all. After some reflection...

case basis, and I strongly oppose deletion because I feel that is a WP:ALLORNOTHING. MMetro (talk) 22:39, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Delete Not everyone in a...

biography pages on wikipedia.--Hack 00:52, 12 March 2007 (UTC) See WP:ALLORNOTHING on why this is not a valid argument. meshach 01:48, 12 March 2007 (UTC)...

Comment And thus we see the problem with using WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:ALLORNOTHING as a rationale for keeping an article - somebody may take you seriously...

NYC, London, or any other place else besides the above stations. WP:ALLORNOTHING is generally not a valid argument in AfD. Also, Whether articles already...

notable. I make my case here: User:Noroton/opinions. Surely, per WP:ALLORNOTHING, this cannot be the case. Many high school (secondary schools in the...

That is generally a bad argument to make. See WP:OTHERSTUFF, and WP:ALLORNOTHING. VG ☎ 17:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC) We'll gladly look at those for deletion...

because it was notable enough. We should avoid basing this decision on WP:ALLORNOTHING. --Parsifal Hello 21:51, 23 August 2007 (UTC) Keep - Subject seems to...

We get it with the Natalie Holloway reference. Repeating the same WP:ALLORNOTHING argument over and over and over and over doesn't make it any more valid...

deletion-argument fallacy. Your argument about proportion is close to WP:ALLORNOTHING or WP:OTHERSTUFF, although neither quite captures it. It isn't our duty...

December 2008 (UTC) This isn't the place for that kind of thing. See WP:ALLORNOTHING, WP:WAX, and WP:ITSA. flaminglawyerc 16:40, 27 December 2008 (UTC) Actually...

EXIST for that matter) is not relevant to this discussion. See also WP:ALLORNOTHING. --Pontificalibus (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2011 (UTC) To repeat, Wikipedia:Notability...

this information"? You're saying that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and it's WP:ALLORNOTHING. But we're discussing this list article, not similar ones. The Mario...

02:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC) I see your argument is equivalent to WP:ALLORNOTHING, which is invalid. Besides, the answer to your question is NO. Some idioms...

this would "set a precedent," so I feel obligated to direct you to WP:ALLORNOTHING. (If you get to cite WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, then...

by Randybenn (talk • contribs) So you're arguing WP:OSE, WP:LOSE, WP:ALLORNOTHING. Nice. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One...

1 March 2017 (UTC) @Inlinetext: Please look at WP:WAX, WP:MASK, WP:ALLORNOTHING, WP:POPULARITY, and WP:INN. Just because one article exists on a major...

Richard☺Decal (talk) 14:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC) Richard WP:OTHERSTUFF , WP:ALLORNOTHING , WP:ARBITRARY (top 100 coins) are arguments to avoid at AfD. Labelled...

but still. Simon Bar Sinister (talk) 06:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC) See WP:ALLORNOTHING; another possibility is if we consider this article individually and...

this article to the Tuvalu election would pretty much constitute WP:ALLORNOTHING which is the argument that Barts1a is making near the end of the page...

satisfactory and the arguments against all seem to be the weak argument of WP:ALLORNOTHING. Colonel Warden (talk) 14:36, 25 December 2009 (UTC) Delete. Very junior...

given names should not be mentioned at all in MOS:DAB; similarly, WP:ALLORNOTHING is being implied here, yet this is not a valid reason for either keeping...

your last sentence there is very much in the argument to avoid camp. WP:ALLORNOTHING. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:43, 31 December 2012 (UTC) WP:ATA...

all of the above keep votes as WP:USEFUL, WP:ILIKEIT, WP:HARMLESS, WP:ALLORNOTHING, WP:JUSTAVOTE, and WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS.--WaltCip 04:52, 6 August 2007...

Surely an exaggeration on his part, but an illustrative one (see also WP:ALLORNOTHING) As an example of seriously problematic editing, this [9] is a doozy...

different animal back then). You may want to review WP:NOTAGAIN and WP:ALLORNOTHING. I'm not recommending deletion of any of those articles. Stay focused...

de los Ojos Tristes Martin (di?) 22:23, May 5, 2021 (UTC) That's WP:ALLORNOTHING. Why does this article specifically meet WP:GNG?--Rusf10 (talk) 22:56...

fictional topics - nothing non-notable should be on Wikipedia. Also, see WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:OTHERSTUFF. Doctorfluffy (talk) 08:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)...

Kronnang Dunn (talk) 06:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC) That is kind of a WP:ALLORNOTHING falacy. Notability is not related to to people being interested in a...

banned, then so should most other bands" is not a valid argument per WP:ALLORNOTHING. When PRP! does release an album and it turns out to be even mildly successful...

literally a copy-paste job, and instead is trying to cling on to WP:ALLORNOTHING. It's already here, and there's no reason to think that WP:BURDEN fell...

Please try to read WP:N, WP:V, and WP:VG/S. While you're at it, read WP:ALLORNOTHING regarding the other thousands of Wiki game articles. MuZemike (talk)...

05:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC) Comment (Grins at the idea of suggesting WP:ALLORNOTHING - See the top of my talk page) - Actually, the point here is that non-amercian...

delete thousands of others. Zagalejo^^^ 02:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING. And, as for setting a precedent...that's fine with me, that's why I...

deleted. Flickerd (talk) 09:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC) Are you aware that WP:ALLORNOTHING is not an argument to use at AfD? Chris Troutman (talk) 09:46, 11 April...

the mood of shoving WP:ITSNOTABLE in our faces, yet clearly ignore WP:ALLORNOTHING on the same page. SashaNein (talk) 15:44, 25 September 2008 (UTC) "Klonoa"...

deleting this article. Dogposter 15:31, 15 August 2009 (UTC) Please see WP:ALLORNOTHING. Most topics form a spectrum in which there are notable cases and then...

nominate it for deletion. LibStar (talk) 04:37, 2 November 2022 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING applies here too to your reasoning. LibStar (talk) 04:41, 2 November...

12 December 2014 (UTC) User:G-13114, please, read this carefully: WP:ALLORNOTHING. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC) Many of the Metrolink...

presuming notability of this article. Also read WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ALLORNOTHING, so you can avoid your above kind of argument in a deletion discussion...

(Emperor (talk) 15:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC)) Also worth bearing in mind: WP:ALLORNOTHING--Mike Cline (talk) 17:39, 8 March 2010 (UTC) Keep useful list of characters...

articles. --NickPenguin(contribs) 01:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC) See WP:ALLORNOTHING. No one here is suggesting that we create 40,000 "Fooians in Barland"...

out of Chicago several times a year for perhaps the last 50 years." WP:ALLORNOTHING Are you arguing the nothing side wrt contracting in Chicago? Hugh (talk)...

— kikichugirl inquire 07:58, 14 December 2014 (UTC) Quidster4040, WP:ALLORNOTHING isn't a valid argument. Tchaliburton (talk) 08:33, 14 December 2014 (UTC)...

the deletion of the articles pertaining to Glover or Dowding. See WP:ALLORNOTHING for that. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)...

keep side to state how this article meets WP:NOTABILITY. To quote WP:ALLORNOTHING "The status of articles on other similar topics has no necessary bearing...

individual basis. The level of notability can vary from play to play so an WP:ALLORNOTHING nomination does not seem appropriate here. Some of these plays directly...

its own article.Lukeno94 (talk) 17:42, 8 November 2012 (UTC) Per WP:ALLORNOTHING, "The status of articles on other similar topics has no necessary bearing...

couple of points for the delete !votes: please remember WP:NTEMP, WP:ALLORNOTHING and AfD is not clean up. Some RSs all of which discuss religious (sectarian)...

reason for deletion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:58, 4 December 2015 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING comes under arguments to avoid in a deletion discussion. There is a consensus...

Logan The Master (talk) 15:38, 11 June 2011 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF (nor WP:ALLORNOTHING) is not a very compelling reason either. Those articles have been a)...

think the other AfD's result is irrelevant to this discussion, as per WP:ALLORNOTHING. And for the sake of debate, why would a program broadcast on a national...

Comment I strongly suggest that you read WP:POINT, WP:SOURCES, and WP:ALLORNOTHING. In particular relation to your use of articles to verify related but...

United States on Alexa and #11,519 most popular site in the world. WP:ALLORNOTHING The article is consistent with articles in the Category:Automotive_p...

(talk) 15:40, 1 February 2018‎ Please avoid using WP:ALLORNOTHING as an argument for or against deletion.--WaltCip (talk) 15:48, 1 February...

the argument "should delete every other crypto article as well" is WP:ALLORNOTHING or WP:OTHERSTUFF, market cap (which varies by factors weekly) and rankings...

(talk) 16:44, 10 December 2017 (UTC) What a moronic argument. See WP:ALLORNOTHING. (And when did The New York Times become "the local press"?) — Malik...

15:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC) It most certainly is WP:WAX, as well as WP:ALLORNOTHING, which is equally invalid. Your concern may be shared among a subset...

exist in the template space. And while my argument may sound like WP:ALLORNOTHING, I believe I still have a point - that this userbox is no worse than...

portion of that essay that applies to the delete and merge arguments is WP:ALLORNOTHING. The points the essay Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions...

doesn't even has any 'site notice' nor an author of the review read WP:ALLORNOTHING ('urban dead' related) mabdul 22:04, 21 November 2011 (UTC) Oh and the...

Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. See: WP:OLDARTICLE and WP:ALLORNOTHING. And >90% of software articles here do establish notability, e.g., CERN...

created precisely this template, and don't tell me I'm wrong for applying ALLORNOTHING when every single argument will be exactly like this because every single...

any fault in keeping these articles. P.S I'm not trying to reason WP:ALLORNOTHING! --Zayeem (talk) 08:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not...

solved through normal editing. - 06:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC) Also see WP:ALLORNOTHING. When someone says, "If you delete X you will also need to delete Y"...

October 2010 (UTC) Keep. (defective nom.) The nomination is a form of WP:ALLORNOTHING. This story has significance beyond immediate news and this article does...

1 March 2017 (UTC) @Inlinetext: Please look at WP:WAX, WP:MASK, WP:ALLORNOTHING, WP:POPULARITY, and WP:INN. Just because one article exists on a major...

the second keep states that yes, this is trivial and then invokes WP:ALLORNOTHING. A quick look through the category shows that only one of the articles...

classic example of an argument to avoid in deletion discussions. See WP:ALLORNOTHING. —Granger (talk · contribs) 20:45, 22 October 2014 (UTC) Yep. But for...

--Fbifriday (talk) 07:20, 10 March 2013 (UTC) I think you meant WP:ALLORNOTHING, AnemoneProjectors. ;-) --GentlemanGhost (talk) 02:56, 15 March 2013...

First, Wikipedia cannot be a source for articles. Second, please see WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:WHATABOUT. Third, big tent parties generally exist in pluralistic...

similar topics has no necessary bearing on a particular article" (WP:ALLORNOTHING). Guoguo12--Talk--  17:57, 30 December 2010 (UTC) Keep. WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST...

(TALK) 09:10, 8 August 2009 (UTC) This is an argument to avoid per WP:ALLORNOTHING, "The status of articles on other similar topics has no bearing on a...

are kept, otherwise we're facing discrimination that DOES call for WP:ALLORNOTHING, per above keep vote.--WaltCip 14:37, 20 July 2007 (UTC) Strong delete...

Deletion/retention of other articles relating to music charts has no bearing (WP:ALLORNOTHING). ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 20:49, 13 September 2011 (UTC) Keep Google 12 links...

2013 (UTC) FYI, your comment is not a valid argumentation as per WP:ALLORNOTHING and so it will be ignored by the admins. Please, provide independent...

argument that other pages need to be deleted doesn't help this one; see WP:ALLORNOTHING. §everal⇒|Times 16:41, 14 October 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

for me"? See also WP:VALINFO, WP:LOCALFAME, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:ALLORNOTHING — shall I go on? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:23, 4 April 2011 (UTC)...

arguments here have boiled down to WP:ILIKEIT, WP:ABOUTEVERYTHING, and WP:ALLORNOTHING. I can see how a fan of the series would find this list helpful, and...

October 2021 (UTC) @Yetanotherkiwi, please see WP:WHATABOUTX and WP:ALLORNOTHING in regards to consistency and drawing comparisons to other articles....

Nurg (talk) 02:45, 1 September 2021 (UTC) @Nurg: The solution to the WP:ALLORNOTHING (which is not a convincing argument why this shouldn't be deleted) is...

don't like it, It's interesting, It looks good, notability inheritance, allornothing... What I'm after is a discussion which encompasses people who aren;t...

Reyes is simply running for office, there's a difference. It isn't an WP:ALLORNOTHING situation, each article is assessed on its own merits. - SudoGhost 02:35...

invoked the idea that "if this page goes, lots of others will too" (WP:ALLORNOTHING), I couldn't honestly suggest it here, since the authors and awards are...

different animal back then). You may want to review WP:NOTAGAIN and WP:ALLORNOTHING. I'm not recommending deletion of any of those articles. Stay focused...

15:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC) An interesting mix of WP:ITSNOTABLE, WP:ALLORNOTHING and "Other shit exists" in other words? ╟─TreasuryTag►person of reasonable...

this article to the Tuvalu election would pretty much constitute WP:ALLORNOTHING which is the argument that Barts1a is making near the end of the page...

significant aspects should - and must - be presented. Repeated stating of WP:ALLORNOTHING does not help the cause on either side; should the root cause of "Fix...

what you're getting at) is a pretty transparent appeal to WP:WAX/WP:ALLORNOTHING. Not going to win you any hearts and minds here. Skomorokh incite 23:42...

July 2009 (UTC) Comment Further to my vote: While noting the raising of ALLORNOTHING, I will also say that a look at TWiT also shows a paucity of verifiable...

Karma-AH (talk) 14:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ALLORNOTHING make it that your arguments don't make a valid rationale to keep the...

these individually. Your argument seems like a classic example of WP:ALLORNOTHING, which in general, is not very strong. I agree that a large number of...

how other organizations don't have VP categories is an assertion of WP:AllORNOTHING, Just because we don't have the other non-related categories you mentioned...

Ichiko_Hashimoto_(musician) Idolmaster:_Xenoglossia Ijuin_Gorō Ikoma_Ienaga Image:Allornothing.jpg Image:BkIII.JPG Image:Boris_Message.gif Image:Brainpowerd-jp.gif...

Phalle's article or her works, it is about Kit Carson Park. Also, WP:ALLORNOTHING - it's about the individual merit of the park, not the merit of the park...

to write a well-referenced, neutral encyclopedia article," claims WP:ALLORNOTHING (essay). Guoguo12--Talk--  19:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC) You can quote...

evidence of third party sources to establish notability? Secondly WP:ALLORNOTHING is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 02:57, 3 July 2011 (UTC)...

Smartyllama (talk) 12:28, 6 July 2017 (UTC) See WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ALLORNOTHING. I strongly contest that every country in the world's records are notable...

nominations should be avoided in these cases as many users will employ an WP:ALLORNOTHING approach. Frank Anchor 15:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC) Delete season articles...

05:18, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Linked to from the WP:PRECEDENT page are WP:ALLORNOTHING, WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, WP:LOSE, and WP:EVERYTHING. And also, WP:Pokémon...

BenjaminHomerBoyd (talk) 12:09, 19 April 2019 (UTC) Add WP:BIG, WP:ALLORNOTHING and WP:ADHOM to the list. It doesn't matter how many festivals his work...

exist (as well as a template); this is a bad argument (a variation of WP:ALLORNOTHING or WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS). Otherwise, the nominator could win the AfD and...

July 2009 (UTC) Comment Further to my vote: While noting the raising of ALLORNOTHING, I will also say that a look at TWiT also shows a paucity of verifiable...

Speedy keep. The nominator seems not to have read WP:DEL#REASON or WP:ALLORNOTHING. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 20:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Speedy keep. Notable...

"best of" subjects in order to defend this one (see WP:OTHERCRAP, WP:ALLORNOTHING, and straw man), I would imagine "best song" would also fit that bill...

TerriersFan (talk) 03:46, 21 March 2013 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:ALLORNOTHING. Please address this specific article.--Atlantima (talk) 15:29, 21 March...

leagues in question. J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 02:19, 31 May 2011 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING seems relevant. Discuss this article on its own merits. —Bagumba (talk)...

as there is of the others, eg. not much. Without getting into an WP:ALLORNOTHING situation, I think we need to be conscious of precedent. My position...

(talk) 20:32, 7 August 2014 (UTC) Precedent's not a good word, per WP:ALLORNOTHING. And yes, getting input from other editors would definitely have to take...

main article. Also, precedence is more along the lines of WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING. Let's stick to policy, okay? McKay 17:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Did you...

place) rather than just cherry-picking Hawaii off. I know, I know, WP:ALLORNOTHING, but if we're gonna do it, let's do it. If there's consensus to delete...

believe Jewish mathematicians is comparable to that? And please no WP:ALLORNOTHING requests. All or nothing nominations will get overturned as this one...

notable. I make my case here: User:Noroton/opinions. Surely, per WP:ALLORNOTHING, this cannot be the case. Many high school (secondary schools in the...

don't like it, It's interesting, It looks good, notability inheritance, allornothing... What I'm after is a discussion which encompasses people who aren;t...

category was hurled into a chaotic AfD with an apparent disregard for WP:ALLORNOTHING.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:47, 20 January 2019 (UTC) Keep all and...

meaningless content. Of course, one can say that my argument is a form of WP:ALLORNOTHING, but if you keep List of actors who have played animated characters and...

that the other article should be deleted as well. See WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING for more information. ttonyb (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC) Comment...

personally and keep your head on what is currently being discussed. See WP:ALLORNOTHING (that means no If you delete this you will have to delete this arguments...

every article of the same type for deletion to get a page deleted, WP:ALLORNOTHING. Jay32183 05:02, 26 July 2007 (UTC) I declare Ignore all rules. This...

HerrHeulsuse (talk) 05:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC) This seems to be like a WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. Population lists are not WP:NOTDB unless it lists down an entire...

meaningless content. Of course, one can say that my argument is a form of WP:ALLORNOTHING, but if you keep List of actors who have played animated characters and...

case in a merge. As well, the "mass nomination" style encourages WP:ALLORNOTHING !votes, which should be avoided. Fifth, "@Ajf773:'s suggestion above...

--Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 12:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC) Basicly WP:ALLORNOTHING. FWIW most articles in that category probably should also be merged or...

then it should be removed in both articles: It's not necessarily WP:ALLORNOTHING. We need to evaluate this page on its own merits and context.—Bagumba...

2008 (UTC+1) And again, you are trying to use the WP:WAX as well as WP:ALLORNOTHING deletion argument pitfalls. The article has needed a complete rewrite...

this out there. StringTheory11 (t • c) 04:01, 8 November 2012 (UTC) WP:ALLORNOTHING, and besides I would support deletion of those articles as well for the...