Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Shortcuts WP:OUTCOMESWP:OUTCOMES WP:AFDPWP:AFDP WP:AFDCOWP:AFDCO...
Click to read more »October 2006 (UTC) Delete as insufficiently notable song per precedent at WP:AFDP#Music. Info should be included in Therion (band) article. --Satori Son 04:01...
Click to read more »area to shop or dine." but WP:NOT a local shopping and dining guide. WP:AFDP currently holds that shopping malls aren't inherently notable, and this particular...
Click to read more »lists several reliable, third-party sources including the BBC and, per WP:AFDP#Education, all verifiable high schools are notable. -- Collectonian (talk ·...
Click to read more »guidelines, not WP:AFDP, come from general discussions about what our coverage should include, and only actual guidelines, not WP:AFDP, reflect actual consensus...
Click to read more »myspace link. Delete --Aranda 56 19:23, 4 December 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:AFDP states that minor companies are generally not notable. -- Saikiri~ 19:58...
Click to read more »WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. Could alternatively be redirected to artist article per WP:AFDP#Music. Can in any case be rewritten if and when the notability guidelines...
Click to read more »wants to figure out a better way of merging. Not notable. Guideline at WP:AFDP#Literature says "Characters from books should be compiled to lists per book...
Click to read more »are directly related to the filmmaker talking about his film. Based on WP:AFDP guidelines, this appears to be a non-notable fan-made film. Also a vanity...
Click to read more »WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. Could alternatively be redirected to artist article per WP:AFDP#Music. Can in any case be rewritten if and when the notability guidelines...
Click to read more »15:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC) Redirect to artist article for now per WP:AFDP#Music. Can be rewritten if and when the notability guidelines for recordings...
Click to read more »21:45, 19 November 2006 (UTC) Yes, they are automatically notable, per WP:AFDP. All other Ohio State Highways have articles. Speedy keep Tubezone 22:49...
Click to read more »no notability here. Denni talk 20:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC) Keep per WP:AFDP, subway stations are notable. There are thousands of station articles and...
Click to read more »know? [T]/[C] AfD? 15:37, 29 December 2005 (UTC) Delete seems to fit in WP:AFDP#Education as nn. Unless he made important contributions elsewhere, but I...
Click to read more »Municipal politician who does not meet WP:BIO given the precedents at WP:AFDP. His video blogging activities do not make him notable. Pfainuk 14:54, 26...
Click to read more »guidelines for Internet Radio, as listed in Articles for Deletion precedents (WP:AFDP). Prod tag removed by anon. JRHorse 01:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC) Delete -...
Click to read more »Merge to Bryan Leaf. Besides being the brother of Leaf, non-notable. Per WP:AFDP, family members of celebrities should be merged to the actual celebrity's...
Click to read more »sources are usually unbiased. However, there was nothing else. And per WP:AFDP "Bars, pubs, cafes and hotels should be listed on WikiTravel" --Marriedtofilm...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy keep, railway stations are always kept per precedent, see WP:AFDP. This one should stay, just like Winchester railway station. Kodai Road station...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) Delete. Normally I would say Redirect to artist article per WP:AFDP#Music until the notability guideline for recordings is met and an article...
Click to read more »Finally, it's an accredited/degree granting educational institution, so per WP:AFDP it is to be kept. -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 16:24, 25 August 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »01:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC) Keep - It seems like a lake should stay. Per WP:AFDP, "Landmarks (i.e. lakes, mountains, etc.) are notable." And since the the...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable per WP:AFDP#Parts_of_schools_and_school-related_organizations and WP:NOT#DIR. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)...
Click to read more »Delete or alternatively Redirect to artist article Conelrad (band) per WP:AFDP#Music, nothing indicates the notability guideline for songs is met. -- Sam...
Click to read more »listed now. DumbBOT 15:42, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Speedy Keep - as per WP:AFDP precedents, Cities and villages are notable, regardless of size -- Whpq 18:57...
Click to read more »says that real places (ie towns, mountains, lakes, etc) are notable (see WP:AFDP). --Daniel Olsen 06:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC) Yes, but this mountain is a...
Click to read more »September 2006 (UTC) Comment - not sure about this one. According to WP:AFDP and WP:BAND, "Bands ... are notable if they have released two albums on a...
Click to read more »noq (talk) 17:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC) Keep. Normally I'd say per WP:AFDP, but in this case there are significant articles about the school in The...
Click to read more »Akihabara about what WP:AFDP actually means in regard to radio stations is fascinating but irrelevant. It's irrelevant because WP:AFDP is a description of...
Click to read more »guideline for recordings. I'm open for redirecting to the artist article per WP:AFDP#Music if anybody believes it can be rewritten at a later point in time. Sam...
Click to read more »WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. Could alternatively be redirected to artist article per WP:AFDP#Music. Can in any case be rewritten if and when the notability guidelines...
Click to read more »15:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC) Redirect to artist article for now per WP:AFDP#Music. Can be rewritten if and when the notability guidelines for recordings...
Click to read more »station? Alan.ca 02:15, 22 December 2006 (UTC) The appropriate passage in WP:AFDP just says it's under discussion, and the discussion seems unlikely to result...
Click to read more »This show has done both, and there are sources backing this up. See WP:AFDP#Broadcast media and WP:TVSHOW for more details. Prhdbt [talk] 23:45, 1 November...
Click to read more »WP:GNG. It could alternatively be redirected to the artist article per WP:AFDP#Music, and both I and TheLongTone (talk · contribs) have edited towards such...
Click to read more »look at my changes? SolidPlaid 06:41, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Weak keep, WP:AFDP. Solid enough article; no point in deleting. — xDanielx T/C 06:53, 14 October...
Click to read more »requirements of WP:V and insufficiently notable per AfD precedent summarized at WP:AFDP#Music. --Satori Son 04:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC) Delete, I think wikipedia...
Click to read more »guidelines, the bio should be in a list of Labour party candidates, per WP:AFDP. I don't think such a page is yet in existence though. LNWWatcher (talk)...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep It's a real township in Ohio with over 2,000 people and per WP:AFDP, "Cities and villages are notable, regardless of size." Just by their existence...
Click to read more »unusual degree of publicity, the leaders of villages are not notable. WP:AFDP#Politicians states the following: Municipal politicians are not inherently...
Click to read more »valid keep reason. Seraphimblade 14:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC) Keep Per WP:AFDP, all rail stations are notable. There's no reason for this one to be singled...
Click to read more »nominator (i.e. me) *did* reveiew WP:DEL and WP:BEFORE. I also reviewd WP:AFDP#Transportation and WP:STATION. Until I posted the AfD, the article had no...
Click to read more »that? Thanks! Warrah (talk) 22:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC) He might mean WP:AFDP not really a policy though. Stupidstudent (talk) 06:02, 3 November 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »- 1. It's a real town in Portugal [2] with over 1,000 people and per WP:AFDP, "Cities and villages are notable, regardless of size." Just by their existence...
Click to read more »be kept. Sam Blacketer 09:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC) Weak keep based on WP:AFDP. — xDanielx T/C 01:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC) You do realize that that is...
Click to read more »good luck trying). Bearcat 03:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:AFDP. Songs are not notable. Mention on the album page and/or redirect. Stifle...
Click to read more »WP:EVENT or a similar notability guideline. I looked at WP:EVENT and WP:AFDP but did not see anything specifically about elections, just candidates. Crisco...
Click to read more »938), no big achievements outside of the field, so fails notability (see WP:AFDP). Punkmorten 23:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. Jonathan 01:56...
Click to read more »-- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 08:51, 13 April 2012 (UTC) WP:N, WP:AFDP. You nominated this page knowing it passes WP guidelines/policies and therefore...
Click to read more »Enochlau 12:22, 5 December 2005 (UTC) It is original research as defined by AFDP, Section 3 --Bchociej 21:32, 29 November 2005 (UTC) Delete yep, non verifyable...
Click to read more »least a portion of their programming schedule in their own studios." WP:AFDP Student TV and Radio, is based on original content, broadcasts it and has...
Click to read more »(Talk) 03:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC) Merge to Phish or Phish tours per WP:AFDP. Bands' tours generally do not merit articles of their own. Stifle 20:59...
Click to read more »nothing to do with Wikipedia guidelines, really, so it doesn't prevail over WP:AFDP per what Greswik said. No merge - if you have info, and are dissatisfied...
Click to read more »to have received more coverage than the founder himself. WP:BLP1E and WP:AFDP#Businesspeople both support this interpretation. If Zetech College is proven...
Click to read more »--BlueSquadronRaven 23:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC) Keep Real town. Per WP:AFDP, "Cities and villages are notable, regardless of size." No need to go against...
Click to read more »in. It is inherently notable. That's why WP:OUTCOMES (a successor to WP:AFDP, the "P" standing for "precedent) has always kept population centers. --Oakshade...
Click to read more »evidence available that this is a large enough neighborhood to fall under WP:AFDP. In the absence of any such verifiability from reliable sources this has...
Click to read more »essay, but keeping articles based on national cup appearances is also WP:AFDP – I can't recall an AfD on a club that passed this threshold being deleted...
Click to read more »here? Just zis Guy you know? 16:48, 21 March 2006 (UTC) Keep per PJM and WP:AFDP --David.Mestel 15:33, 21 March 2006 (UTC) Weak delete as per JzG, just barely...
Click to read more »Tokyo subway stations. Akihabara 23:29, 26 December 2006 (UTC) Keep per WP:AFDP. Discussion of inherent station inslusion is at User:Mangoe/Wikipedia is...
Click to read more »December 2005 (UTC) Keep Cities themselves are notable, regardless of size - WP:AFDP Lbbzman 04:37, 24 December 2005 (UTC) Extreme keep. All real places are notable...
Click to read more »prizes were won, no new literary schools were begun, etc. The guide at WP:AFDP#Literature indicates that "Books are notable if well-known, and should be...
Click to read more »notability is questionable and published papers do not provide notability per WP:AFDP. (Note: I nominated for speedy) If its kept I would only support a merge...
Click to read more »well as the social sciences. My belief is reinforced by section three of WP:AFDP none of the examples given seem to apply. Electricz 03:17, 15 November 2005...
Click to read more »(talk • contribs)) 18:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOT WP:WINAD WP:AFDP#words Wikipedia is not for lists of definitions or lists of quotes. Also...
Click to read more »reliable sources independent of the subject to write an article. Even WP:AFDP emphasizes that "This page is not policy." If people find arguments made...
Click to read more »If that is so why do we have a page that list some AFD precedent? (See WP:AFDP) ChrisLamb 16:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC) I defer to DGG, an administrator, on...
Click to read more »opinions should be discounted as at odds with community consensus. See also WP:AFDP#Oldest people, which notes: "Articles about people known only for being the...
Click to read more »I believe the current general consensus and precedent, per WP:BIO and WP:AFDP, is that losing candidates are not sufficiently notable absent additional...
Click to read more »and guidelines apply to the article under discussion here. Note that WP:AFDP emphasizes that "This page is not policy." Pan Dan 16:30, 2 February 2007...
Click to read more »or policy about large shopping centres/malls not being notable - just WP:AFDP which says that their notability is disputed. There is clear support in WikiProject...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) It's a good idea, but that battle's been had and lost. See WP:AFDP#Education. Whatever its merits, the precedent is on the side of keeping articles...
Click to read more »been kept for two years. That's a fairly strong precedent. Please see WP:AFDP (education section). Srose (talk) 20:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC) *Keep - on the...
Click to read more »if you could point towards a policy like WP:NOT or an essay (maybe an WP:AFDP that you've seen?) that clarifies what kind of coverage you mean, it would...
Click to read more »company's products, which makes it even a stronger deletion candidate (see WP:AFDP#Companies). Didn't anything notable happen to the company or was caused by...
Click to read more »that consensus was already reached via WP:AFDP and that a consensus on this article is not needed. WP:AFDP is a guidline and not a policy. The official...
Click to read more »"most schools aren't notable" camp (feel free to disagree with this). WP:AFDP points out that most school AfDs result in no consensus. Will you be trying...
Click to read more »school related pages be familiar with WP:SPIP, WP:NOBILITY, WP:ROTM, and WP:AFDP#Education. A link on a disambiguation page is not an indiction that an article...
Click to read more »parishes and anything larger, but for smaller places it's much less clear. WP:AFDP#Places helps to a degree (all four of the places called Common End would...
Click to read more »logs) Hello. Comments made by editor K.e.coffman regarding the notability of AFDP Global have been taken on board. The notability guidelines require that 'each...
Click to read more »deletion/Old WP:AFDO Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes WP:AFDP Wikipedia:Backlog WP:BL, WP:BACK, WP:BACKLOG Wikipedia:Categories for discussion...
Click to read more »yes. While there is no accepted notability guideline for settlements, WP:AFDP#Places agrees with Bugs. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »station in my most recent talk archive.) Xoloz 15:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC) Per WP:AFDP, the criteria that radio stations have typically had to meet to survive here...
Click to read more »Akihabara about what WP:AFDP actually means in regard to radio stations is fascinating but irrelevant. It's irrelevant because WP:AFDP is a description of...
Click to read more »multiple times, and were subject to extensive genetic analyses. Also note in WP:AFDP#General notability guideline: "However, there is still a lot of debate on...
Click to read more »Bullshido.net article. I know, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but let's not forget WP:AFDP: "The fact that it's 'only' a common outcome is not sufficient grounds to...
Click to read more »how RfDs usually go, not to prescribe how they should go (compare to WP:AFDP). You are welcome to become an RfD regular too. We'd be happy to have you...
Click to read more »938), no big achievements outside of the field, so fails notability (see WP:AFDP). Punkmorten 23:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. Jonathan 01:56...
Click to read more »WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. Could alternatively be redirected to artist article per WP:AFDP#Music. Can in any case be rewritten if and when the notability guidelines...
Click to read more »nothing to do with Wikipedia guidelines, really, so it doesn't prevail over WP:AFDP per what Greswik said. No merge - if you have info, and are dissatisfied...
Click to read more »Bullshido.net article. I know, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but let's not forget WP:AFDP: "The fact that it's 'only' a common outcome is not sufficient grounds to...
Click to read more »Municipal politician who does not meet WP:BIO given the precedents at WP:AFDP. His video blogging activities do not make him notable. Pfainuk 14:54, 26...
Click to read more »2015 (UTC) Delete. Normally I would say Redirect to artist article per WP:AFDP#Music until the notability guideline for recordings is met and an article...
Click to read more »lists several reliable, third-party sources including the BBC and, per WP:AFDP#Education, all verifiable high schools are notable. -- Collectonian (talk ·...
Click to read more »and guidelines apply to the article under discussion here. Note that WP:AFDP emphasizes that "This page is not policy." Pan Dan 16:30, 2 February 2007...
Click to read more »reliable sources independent of the subject to write an article. Even WP:AFDP emphasizes that "This page is not policy." If people find arguments made...
Click to read more »multiple times, and were subject to extensive genetic analyses. Also note in WP:AFDP#General notability guideline: "However, there is still a lot of debate on...
Click to read more »articles (one featured!) to back up my argument. And now I will point you to WP:AFDP#Tips on dealing with other material. This can be refactored into an article...
Click to read more »15:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC) Redirect to artist article for now per WP:AFDP#Music. Can be rewritten if and when the notability guidelines for recordings...
Click to read more »This show has done both, and there are sources backing this up. See WP:AFDP#Broadcast media and WP:TVSHOW for more details. Prhdbt [talk] 23:45, 1 November...
Click to read more »in. It is inherently notable. That's why WP:OUTCOMES (a successor to WP:AFDP, the "P" standing for "precedent) has always kept population centers. --Oakshade...
Click to read more »essay, but keeping articles based on national cup appearances is also WP:AFDP – I can't recall an AfD on a club that passed this threshold being deleted...
Click to read more »WP:GNG. It could alternatively be redirected to the artist article per WP:AFDP#Music, and both I and TheLongTone (talk · contribs) have edited towards such...
Click to read more »I believe the current general consensus and precedent, per WP:BIO and WP:AFDP, is that losing candidates are not sufficiently notable absent additional...
Click to read more »If that is so why do we have a page that list some AFD precedent? (See WP:AFDP) ChrisLamb 16:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC) I defer to DGG, an administrator, on...
Click to read more »parishes and anything larger, but for smaller places it's much less clear. WP:AFDP#Places helps to a degree (all four of the places called Common End would...
Click to read more »look at my changes? SolidPlaid 06:41, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Weak keep, WP:AFDP. Solid enough article; no point in deleting. — xDanielx T/C 06:53, 14 October...
Click to read more »station in my most recent talk archive.) Xoloz 15:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC) Per WP:AFDP, the criteria that radio stations have typically had to meet to survive here...
Click to read more »be kept. Sam Blacketer 09:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC) Weak keep based on WP:AFDP. — xDanielx T/C 01:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC) You do realize that that is...
Click to read more »guidelines, the bio should be in a list of Labour party candidates, per WP:AFDP. I don't think such a page is yet in existence though. LNWWatcher (talk)...
Click to read more »nominator (i.e. me) *did* reveiew WP:DEL and WP:BEFORE. I also reviewd WP:AFDP#Transportation and WP:STATION. Until I posted the AfD, the article had no...
Click to read more »coverage" arguments) and deleting. If your argument was actually included in WP:AFDP, then it's valid to cite that argument as such and even in that case it would...
Click to read more »guideline for recordings. I'm open for redirecting to the artist article per WP:AFDP#Music if anybody believes it can be rewritten at a later point in time. Sam...
Click to read more »noq (talk) 17:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC) Keep. Normally I'd say per WP:AFDP, but in this case there are significant articles about the school in The...
Click to read more »evidence available that this is a large enough neighborhood to fall under WP:AFDP. In the absence of any such verifiability from reliable sources this has...
Click to read more »to have received more coverage than the founder himself. WP:BLP1E and WP:AFDP#Businesspeople both support this interpretation. If Zetech College is proven...
Click to read more »that? Thanks! Warrah (talk) 22:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC) He might mean WP:AFDP not really a policy though. Stupidstudent (talk) 06:02, 3 November 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Delete or alternatively Redirect to artist article Conelrad (band) per WP:AFDP#Music, nothing indicates the notability guideline for songs is met. -- Sam...
Click to read more »The only reason I've ever seen or been given for this is because of WP:AFDP. So, we don't delete high school articles because we don't delete high school...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable per WP:AFDP#Parts_of_schools_and_school-related_organizations and WP:NOT#DIR. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)...
Click to read more »school related pages be familiar with WP:SPIP, WP:NOBILITY, WP:ROTM, and WP:AFDP#Education. A link on a disambiguation page is not an indiction that an article...
Click to read more »that's all to common on AfD. WilyD 19:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC) Per WP:AFDP (an organized list of precedents), all towns and cities are notable. All...
Click to read more »if you could point towards a policy like WP:NOT or an essay (maybe an WP:AFDP that you've seen?) that clarifies what kind of coverage you mean, it would...
Click to read more »-- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 08:51, 13 April 2012 (UTC) WP:N, WP:AFDP. You nominated this page knowing it passes WP guidelines/policies and therefore...
Click to read more »WP:EVENT or a similar notability guideline. I looked at WP:EVENT and WP:AFDP but did not see anything specifically about elections, just candidates. Crisco...
Click to read more »Finally, it's an accredited/degree granting educational institution, so per WP:AFDP it is to be kept. -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 16:24, 25 August 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »articles (one featured!) to back up my argument. And now I will point you to WP:AFDP#Tips on dealing with other material. This can be refactored into an article...
Click to read more »unusual degree of publicity, the leaders of villages are not notable. WP:AFDP#Politicians states the following: Municipal politicians are not inherently...
Click to read more »mentioned, and WP:SCHOOL was a failed proposal; there is a brief mention at WP:AFDP but that page is not a policy or guideline. Yet, try to bring a high school...
Click to read more »per WP:AFDP, nor convincing. Pan Dan 13:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 'Speedy keep Train and subway stations are automatic inclusions, per WP:AFDP, at least...
Click to read more »that consensus was already reached via WP:AFDP and that a consensus on this article is not needed. WP:AFDP is a guideline and not a policy. The official...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) Teeny little problem... WP:AFDP doesn't say that. -Amarkov blahedits 17:58, 22 December 2006 (UTC) WP:AFDP says "Subway and railway stations are...
Click to read more »that consensus was already reached via WP:AFDP and that a consensus on this article is not needed. WP:AFDP is a guideline and not a policy. The official...
Click to read more »that's all to common on AfD. WilyD 19:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC) Per WP:AFDP (an organized list of precedents), all towns and cities are notable. All...
Click to read more »Enochlau 12:22, 5 December 2005 (UTC) It is original research as defined by AFDP, Section 3 --Bchociej 21:32, 29 November 2005 (UTC) Delete yep, non verifyable...
Click to read more »wants to figure out a better way of merging. Not notable. Guideline at WP:AFDP#Literature says "Characters from books should be compiled to lists per book...
Click to read more »or policy about large shopping centres/malls not being notable - just WP:AFDP which says that their notability is disputed. There is clear support in WikiProject...
Click to read more »been kept for two years. That's a fairly strong precedent. Please see WP:AFDP (education section). Srose (talk) 20:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC) *Keep - on the...
Click to read more »sources are usually unbiased. However, there was nothing else. And per WP:AFDP "Bars, pubs, cafes and hotels should be listed on WikiTravel" --Marriedtofilm...
Click to read more »myspace link. Delete --Aranda 56 19:23, 4 December 2005 (UTC) Delete WP:AFDP states that minor companies are generally not notable. -- Saikiri~ 19:58...
Click to read more »area to shop or dine." but WP:NOT a local shopping and dining guide. WP:AFDP currently holds that shopping malls aren't inherently notable, and this particular...
Click to read more »December 2005 (UTC) Keep Cities themselves are notable, regardless of size - WP:AFDP Lbbzman 04:37, 24 December 2005 (UTC) Extreme keep. All real places are notable...
Click to read more »(UTC) Speedy keep, railway stations are always kept per precedent, see WP:AFDP. This one should stay, just like Winchester railway station. Kodai Road station...
Click to read more »good luck trying). Bearcat 03:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:AFDP. Songs are not notable. Mention on the album page and/or redirect. Stifle...
Click to read more »know? [T]/[C] AfD? 15:37, 29 December 2005 (UTC) Delete seems to fit in WP:AFDP#Education as nn. Unless he made important contributions elsewhere, but I...
Click to read more »once created the shortcut WP:LISTOUTCOMES to the relevant section on WP:AFDP, but it is not a mistake I expect from an admin candidate. Knowledge about...
Click to read more »21:45, 19 November 2006 (UTC) Yes, they are automatically notable, per WP:AFDP. All other Ohio State Highways have articles. Speedy keep Tubezone 22:49...
Click to read more »least a portion of their programming schedule in their own studios." WP:AFDP Student TV and Radio, is based on original content, broadcasts it and has...
Click to read more »October 2006 (UTC) Delete as insufficiently notable song per precedent at WP:AFDP#Music. Info should be included in Therion (band) article. --Satori Son 04:01...
Click to read more »notability is questionable and published papers do not provide notability per WP:AFDP. (Note: I nominated for speedy) If its kept I would only support a merge...
Click to read more »valid keep reason. Seraphimblade 14:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC) Keep Per WP:AFDP, all rail stations are notable. There's no reason for this one to be singled...
Click to read more »2006 (UTC) It's a good idea, but that battle's been had and lost. See WP:AFDP#Education. Whatever its merits, the precedent is on the side of keeping articles...
Click to read more »company's products, which makes it even a stronger deletion candidate (see WP:AFDP#Companies). Didn't anything notable happen to the company or was caused by...
Click to read more »listed now. DumbBOT 15:42, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Speedy Keep - as per WP:AFDP precedents, Cities and villages are notable, regardless of size -- Whpq 18:57...
Click to read more »guidelines for Internet Radio, as listed in Articles for Deletion precedents (WP:AFDP). Prod tag removed by anon. JRHorse 01:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC) Delete -...
Click to read more »- 1. It's a real town in Portugal [28] with over 1,000 people and per WP:AFDP, "Cities and villages are notable, regardless of size." Just by their existence...
Click to read more »says that real places (ie towns, mountains, lakes, etc) are notable (see WP:AFDP). --Daniel Olsen 06:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC) Yes, but this mountain is a...
Click to read more »(talk • contribs)) 18:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOT WP:WINAD WP:AFDP#words Wikipedia is not for lists of definitions or lists of quotes. Also...
Click to read more »September 2006 (UTC) Comment - not sure about this one. According to WP:AFDP and WP:BAND, "Bands ... are notable if they have released two albums on a...
Click to read more »requirements of WP:V and insufficiently notable per AfD precedent summarized at WP:AFDP#Music. --Satori Son 04:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC) Delete, I think wikipedia...
Click to read more »Tokyo subway stations. Akihabara 23:29, 26 December 2006 (UTC) Keep per WP:AFDP. Discussion of inherent station inslusion is at User:Mangoe/Wikipedia is...
Click to read more »(UTC) Keep It's a real township in Ohio with over 2,000 people and per WP:AFDP, "Cities and villages are notable, regardless of size." Just by their existence...
Click to read more »well as the social sciences. My belief is reinforced by section three of WP:AFDP none of the examples given seem to apply. Electricz 03:17, 15 November 2005...
Click to read more »01:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC) Keep - It seems like a lake should stay. Per WP:AFDP, "Landmarks (i.e. lakes, mountains, etc.) are notable." And since the the...
Click to read more »coverage" arguments) and deleting. If your argument was actually included in WP:AFDP, then it's valid to cite that argument as such and even in that case it would...
Click to read more »Template:WP:AFD/Old Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Precedents Template:WP:AFDP Wikipedia:Association of Member Investigations Template:WP:AMI Wikipedia:Association...
Click to read more »keep voters that rail and subway stations are inherently notable and per WP:AFDP ("Subway and railway stations are allowed, but notability is currently under...
Click to read more »here? Just zis Guy you know? 16:48, 21 March 2006 (UTC) Keep per PJM and WP:AFDP --David.Mestel 15:33, 21 March 2006 (UTC) Weak delete as per JzG, just barely...
Click to read more »keep voters that rail and subway stations are inherently notable and per WP:AFDP ("Subway and railway stations are allowed, but notability is currently under...
Click to read more »opinions should be discounted as at odds with community consensus. See also WP:AFDP#Oldest people, which notes: "Articles about people known only for being the...
Click to read more »